[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 67 (Thursday, April 8, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17210-17214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-8569]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Federal Transit Administration
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century; Implementation
Information for the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Deployment
Program
AGENCIES: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit
Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document publishes implementation information on the
[[Page 17211]]
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Deployment Program described
in sections 5208 and 5209 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA-21), enacted on June 9, 1998. The notice identifies the
criteria for the two components of the ITS Deployment Program, namely
the ITS Integration Program and the Commercial Vehicle Intelligent
Transportation Infrastructure Deployment Program. Implementation
information on this program was issued to the FHWA Division and the FTA
Regional Offices on January 4, 1999, and is contained in this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For the ITS Integration component of
the ITS Deployment Program: Ms. Toni Wilbur, FHWA Office of Travel
Management, HOTM, (202) 366-2199; or Mr. Ron Boenau, FTA Office of
Mobility Innovation, TRI-11, (202) 366-0195; for the Commercial Vehicle
ITS Infrastructure Deployment component of the ITS Deployment Program:
Mr. Steve Crane, FHWA Office of Motor Carrier and Highway Safety, HMTE,
(202) 366-0950; for legal issues: Mr. Wilbert Baccus, HCC-32, FHWA
Office of the Chief Counsel (202) 366-0780; or Linda Sorkin, TCC-24,
FTA Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1936, 400 Seventh Street
SW., Washington, DC. 20590. FHWA office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to
4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FTA
office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded using a modem
and suitable communications software from the Government Printing
Office Electronic Bulletin Board Service at (202) 512-1661. Internet
users may reach the Federal Register's home page at: http://
www.nara.gov/fedreg and the Government Printing Office's database at:
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara.
Background
The TEA-21 (Pub. L. 105-178, 112 Stat. 107) implementation material
published in this notice is provided for informational purposes only.
Specific questions on any of the material published in this notice
should be directed to the contact persons named in the caption FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT for this program.
This implementation information applies to ITS projects in areas
designated in either the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681)
or in section 5208(g) of TEA-21. Although the locations and funding
amounts for the ITS Deployment Program have been designated by
Congress, specific projects must contribute to the integration and
interoperability of intelligent transportation systems, consistent with
the criteria set forth in TEA-21.
Section 5208 of TEA-21 establishes the ITS Integration Program to
accelerate the integration and interoperability of ITS systems in both
metropolitan and rural areas, and provides criteria for the selection
of projects that will support this goal. These criteria include the
demonstration of a strong commitment to cooperation among agencies,
jurisdictions, and the private sector, and a commitment to a
comprehensive plan of fully integrated intelligent transportation
system deployment in accordance with the national ITS architecture and
standards. Public-private partnerships are encouraged, including
arrangements that generate revenue to offset public investment costs
and minimize the relative percentage and amount of Federal ITS funding.
All ITS Integration Program projects must be part of approved plans and
programs developed under applicable statewide and metropolitan
transportation planning processes and applicable State air quality
implementation plans, as appropriate, at the time at which Federal
funds are sought. In addition, funding recipients must demonstrate a
commitment to the long-term operations, management and maintenance of
the system without continued reliance on Federal ITS funding.
The purpose of the Commercial Vehicle Intelligent Transportation
Infrastructure Deployment Program, as described in section 5209 of TEA-
21, is to improve the safety and productivity of commercial vehicles
and drivers, and to reduce the costs associated with commercial vehicle
operations and Federal and State commercial vehicle regulatory
requirements. TEA-21 establishes criteria for identifying priority
areas and encourages multistate cooperation and corridor development to
improve the safety of commercial vehicle operations. Activities funded
under the Commercial Vehicle Intelligent Transportation Infrastructure
Deployment Program should advance the use of technology to increase the
efficiency of the regulatory inspection processes, reduce
administrative burdens, facilitate commercial vehicle inspections, and
generally increase the effectiveness of enforcement efforts. Funds can
also be used to enhance the safe passage of commercial vehicles across
the United States and across international borders.
The FHWA and the FTA are publishing this notice to provide
information to the public on the activities and/or projects that are
eligible for funding under the ITS Deployment Program, the locations
and amounts of funding, and how the TEA-21 criteria will be met for the
candidate projects to be funded.
(Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; sec. 5208, Pub. L. 105-178, 112 Stat.
458, (23 U.S.C. 502 nt.); sec. 5209, Pub. L. 105-178, 112 Stat. 460,
(23 U.S.C. 502 nt.); 49 CFR 1.48).
Issued on: March 31, 1999.
Kenneth R. Wykle,
Federal Highway Administrator.
Gordon J. Linton,
Federal Transit Administrator.
The text of the FHWA and the FTA implementation guidelines
memorandum follows: January 4, 1999 (HTV-3, TOA-2)
ACTION: Notification of Participation in the TEA-21 ITS Deployment
Program, FHWA Deputy Administrator, FTA Deputy Administrator, FHWA
Division Administrators, FTA Regional Administrators, Motor Carrier
State Directors.
This is to notify you that areas within your State or region have
been identified to participate in the Intelligent Transportation
Systems (ITS) Deployment Program based on designations contained in
either the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental
Appropriations Act, 1999, or in Section 5208(g)(2) of the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21).
While the FY 1999 Appropriations Act specifies the locations and
amounts of funding, it does not designate specific projects to be
funded. Rather, the Conference Report accompanying the FY 1999
Appropriations Act specifies that projects selected for funding
``contribute to the integration and interoperability of intelligent
transportation systems consistent with the criteria set forth in TEA-
21.''
The ITS Deployment Program authorized in TEA-21 includes two
components. The ITS Integration component of the ITS Deployment Program
is described in section 5208 of TEA-21. This program provides Federal
ITS funding for the integration of multimodal ITS components in a
variety of settings, including large regional or multi-State areas,
metropolitan areas, and rural areas. Specific project
[[Page 17212]]
selection criteria are included in TEA-21.
The Commercial Vehicle Intelligent Transportation Infrastructure
Deployment component of the ITS Deployment Program is described in
section 5209 of TEA-21. This program provides Federal ITS funding to
support the goal Congress established in TEA-21 to complete deployment
of Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks (CVISN) in a
majority of States by September 30, 2003.
Progress towards this goal can only be achieved if those States
designated in the FY 99 Appropriations Act use all or some of their
funding to advance towards CVISN Level 1 Capabilities in their State.
Because this is a multimodal program, it will require close
cooperation among FHWA Federal-aid and Motor Carrier staff, FHWA
division offices and resource centers, FTA regional office staff and
the appropriate headquarters offices. Areas designated for ITS
Deployment Program funding will be required to submit project
descriptions specifying the proposed use of these funds and indicating
how the TEA-21 criteria will be met. We are finalizing guidance
materials to assist you in working with the State and local agencies to
implement the ITS Deployment Program. This material will be provided to
you in the near future. It should be shared and discussed with the
highway and transit officials in the State departments of
transportation, and the appropriate local highway, transit, and
metropolitan planning organizations as soon as possible after you
receive it.
Attached is a list of the areas and the congressionally designated
amounts contained in the FY 1999 Appropriations Act. As explained in
the attachment, the actual amounts of funding available are less than
the amount designated. This is due to the obligation limitation, the
fact that the total amount of appropriation and authorization earmarks
exceeds the TEA-21 program authorization, and the need to provide
funding for national evaluations as specified in TEA-21.
Thank you in advance for your assistance in this important
departmental initiative. If you have any questions about the ITS
Deployment Program, please call Ms. Toni Wilbur, Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), (202) 366-2199; Mr. Ron Boenau, Federal Transit
Administration (FTA), (202) 366-0195; or Mr. Steve Crane, FHWA Office
of Motor Carrier and Highway Safety, (202) 366-0950.
/s/ signed by:
Nuria I. Fernandez.
/s/ signed by:
Gloria J. Jeff.
Attachment 1
December 23, 1998
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
FY 1999 FUNDING FOR CONGRESSIONALLY DESIGNATED PROJECTS
Congressionally Designated Amounts Versus Amounts Authorized
FY 1999 Congressional designations against the ITS Deployment
Program total $114.8 million; $9.8 million in TEA-21, and $105 million
in the FY 1999 DOT Appropriation Act (see column 2 of the attached
worksheet). However, TEA-21 only authorizes $105 million for the ITS
Deployment Program in FY 1999. Thus, the $114.8 million in
Congressionally designated projects exceeds the FY 1999 available
amount of $105.0 billion by $9.8 million. To adjust the Congressionally
designated amounts downward to the authorized level, each
Congressionally designated project was necessarily reduced by
approximately 8.5% (see column 3 of the attached worksheet).
Reductions Required by Section 1102(f) of TEA-21
The ITS Program is not only subject to the overall obligation
limitation on Federal-aid Highways but is also subject to proportional
distribution of that limitation. In FY 1999, each State and/or program
subject to the distribution of the FY 1999 Obligation Limitation
receives an obligation limitation equal to 88.3% of the amounts
``authorized'' for FY 1999.
Basically, section 1102(f) states that any amounts for
``allocated'' programs which cannot be obligated within the distributed
obligation limitation will be taken away from these programs and
redistributed to the States. Implementation of this section will reduce
the ITS Deployment Program from $105 million to $92.715 million, a
reduction of 11.7%. This mandated 11.7% reduction ($12.285 million) has
been applied proportionately to each Congressionally designated project
as reflected in Column 5 of the attached worksheet.
Reductions for Project Evaluations
Section 5204(j) requires the Secretary to issue guidelines and
requirements to ensure that independent evaluations will be made on ITS
operational tests and deployment projects. This section also directs
the establishment of evaluation funding to ensure adequate evaluations
are carried out.
For fiscal year 1999, all ITS Deployment Program funding recipients
will be required to conduct an evaluation that is locally funded and
executed. Cross-cutting assessments of these local evaluations will be
conducted by the ITS Joint Program Office and will include gathering
data and disseminating results. More details on the scope of local
evaluations will be included in the forthcoming ITS Deployment Program
guidance materials.
In-depth, independent evaluations of selected projects of national
significance (as determined by the ITS Joint Program Office), will also
be required. Funding for the evaluations of significant projects will
be derived by pooling 2% of each project amount (see Column 7 of the
attached worksheet). Please note that projects III and IV on the
attached worksheet were funded from the ITS Deployment Program in TEA-
21, but are exempt from the evaluation requirement since they are
research projects, not ITS operational tests or deployments.
Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks (CVISN) (See Column
9)
In TEA-21 Congress established a goal to complete deployment of
CVISN in a majority of States by September 30, 2003. The FHWA's State
CVISN Level 1 deployment strategy consists of three key steps:
Planning, Design, and Implementation and Deployment. Our strategy for
States to achieve this goal will require the use of all or a portion of
1999 funds to complete at a minimum the next step. The first step,
Planning, includes participation in two ITS/CVO training courses and
the development of an ITS/CVO State business plan. This step is
essential to promote ITS/CVO awareness and coalition building among the
State agencies involved in CVO and with industry. This step is
estimated to require a minimum of $50 thousand of Federal ITS Funds.
The focus of the second step, Design, is for the State to establish its
CVISN project team, including at a minimum a CVISN project manager and
a system architect. Once these individuals have been selected, a State
can participate in the Understanding ITS/CVO Technology training course
and in three CVISN
[[Page 17213]]
workshops. These activities will assist the State in developing its
CVISN Project Plan and Top-Level Design. This step is estimated to
require at least $350 thousand of Federal ITS Funds. The final step is
the Implementation and Deployment of CVISN Level 1 Capabilities. The
total amount of Federal ITS Funds for the three steps is $3 million.
This represents the 50% ITS Federal share of the estimated $6 to $10
million total cost, based on CVISN project plans submitted by the
participating Pilot States. Column 9 lists the minimum amount of FY 99
funds that are needed to support the completion of the next step for
States identified in the Congressional designations. Note, the States
of Minnesota, Maryland, and Washington (in partnership with Oregon)
have already received Federal ITS deployment funding prior to FY 99.
The minimum amount available for the State of Minnesota is $2,000,000,
for the State of Maryland is $1,976,673.76, and for the State of
Washington is $1,582,939.02 to complete the third step.
Federal Highway Administration / Federal Transit Administration--Analysis of FY 1999 Its Deployment Program Funding
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column 2 Column 3 Column 5 Section Column 7 Column 10
Congressionally Designations Column 4 Total 1102(f) Column 6 Project Column 8 Column 9 Available for
Column 1 Project Designated Exceed Authorized Reduction Subtotal Evaluation Adjusted Total Minimum for Integration
Amounts Authorizations (11.7%) Reduction (2%) Available CVISN Projects
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEA--21 Earmarks: $9,800,000.00 ($836,585.37) $8,963,414.63 ($1,048,719.51) $7,914,695.12 ($113,067.07) $7,801,628.05 $0.00 $7,801,628.05
1. Great Lakes ITS 2,000,000.00 (170,731.71) 1,829,268.29 (214,024.39) 1,615,243.90 (32,304.88) 1,582,939.02 0.00 1,582,939.02
Implementation.................
2. Northeast ITS Implementation. 5,000,000.00 (426,829.27) 4,573,170.73 (535,060.98) 4,038,109.76 (80,762.20) 3,957,347.56 0.00 3,957,347.56
3. Haz. Mat. Monitoring Systems. 1,500,000.00 (128,048.78) 1,371,951.22 (160,518.29) 1,211,432.93 0.00 1,211,432.93 0.00 1,211,432.93
4. Translink--Texas Transp. Inst 1,300,000.00 (110,975.61) 1,189,024.39 (139,115.85) 1,049,908.54 0.00 1,049,908.54 0.00 1,049,908.54
FY 1999 Appropriation Act; 105,000,000.00 (8,963,414.63) 96,036,585.37 (11,236,280.49) 84,800,304.88 (1,696,006.10) 83,104,298.78 9,861,612.80 73,242,685.98
1. Amherst, Massachusetts....... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
2. Arlington County, Virginia... 750,000.00 (64,024.39) 685,975.61 (80,259.15) 605,716.46 (12,114.33) 593,602.13 0.00 593,602.13
3. Atlanta, Georgia............. 2,000,000.00 (170,731.71) 1,829,268.29 (214,024.39) 1,615,243.90 (32,304.88) 1,582,939.02 0.00 1,582,939.02
4. Brandon, Vermont............. 375,000.00 (32,012.20) 342,987.80 (40,129.57) 302,858.23 (6,057.16) 296,801.07 0.00 296,801.07
5. Buffalo, New York............ 500,000.00 (42,682.93) 457,317.07 (53,506.10) 403,810.98 (8,076.22) 395,734.76 0.00 395,734.76
6. Centre Valley, Pennsylvania.. 500,000.00 (42,682.93) 457,317.07 (53,506.10) 403,810.98 (8,076.22) 395,734.76 0.00 395,734.76
7. Cleveland, Ohio.............. 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
8. Columbus, Ohio............... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
9. Corpus Christi, Texas........ 900,000.00 (76,829.27) 823,170.73 (96,310.98) 726,859.76 (14,537.20) 712,322.56 0.00 712,322.56
10. Dade County, Florida........ 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
11. Del Rio, Texas.............. 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
12. Delaware River, Pennsylvania 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
13. Fairfield, California....... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
14. Fitchburg, Massachusetts.... 500,000.00 (42,682.93) 457,317.07 (53,506.10) 403,810.98 (8,076.22) 395,734.76 0.00 395,734.76
15. Greater Metro. Region--DC... 5,000,000.00 (426,829.27) 4,573,170.73 (535,060.98) 4,038,109.76 (80,762.20) 3,957,347.56 0.00 3,957,347.56
16. Hammond, Louisiana.......... 4,000,000.00 (341,463.41) 3,658,536.59 (428,048.78) 3,230,487.80 (64,609.76) 3,165,878.05 0.00 3,165,878.05
17. Houston, Texas.............. 2,000,000.00 (170,731.71) 1,829,268.29 (214,024.39) 1,615,243.90 (32,304.88) 1,582,939.02 0.00 1,582,939.02
18. Huntington Beach, California 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
19. Huntsville, Alabama......... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
20. Inglewood, California....... 1,500,000.00 (128,048.78) 1,371,951.22 (160,518.29) 1,211,432.93 (24,228.66) 1,187,204.27 0.00 1,187,204.27
21. Jackson, Mississippi........ 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
22. Kansas City, Missouri....... 500,000.00 (42,682.93) 457,317.07 (53,506.10) 403,810.98 (8,076.22) 395,734.76 0.00 395,734.76
23. Laredo, Texas............... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
24. Middlesboro, Kentucky....... 3,000,000.00 (256,097.56) 2,743,902.44 (321,036.59) 2,422,865.85 (48,457.32) 2,374,408.54 0.00 2,374,408.54
25. Mission Viejo, California... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
26. Mobile, Alabama............. 2,500,000.00 (213,414.63) 2,286,585.37 (267,530.49) 2,019,054.88 (40,381.10) 1,978,673.78 0.00 1,978,673.78
27. Monroe County, New York..... 400,000.00 (34,146.34) 365,853.66 (42,804.88) 323,048.78 (6,460.98) 316,587.80 0.00 316,587.80
28. Montgomery, Alabama......... 1,250,000.00 (106,707.32) 1,143,292.68 (133,765.24) 1,009,527.44 (20,190.55) 989,336.89 0.00 989,336.89
29. Nashville, Tennessee........ 500,000.00 (42,682.93) 457,317.07 (53,506.10) 403,810.98 (8,076.22) 395,734.76 0.00 395,734.76
30. New Orleans, Louisiana...... 1,500,000.00 (128,048.78) 1,371,951.22 (160,518.29) 1,211,432.93 (24,228.66) 1,187,204.27 0.00 1,187,204.27
31. New York City, New York..... 2,500,000.00 (213,414.63) 2,286,585.37 (267,530.49) 2,019,054.88 (40,381.10) 1,978,673.78 0.00 1,978,673.78
32. New York/Long Island, NY.... 2,300,000.00 (196,341.46) 2,103,658.54 (246,128.05) 1,857,530.49 (37,150.61) 1,820,379.88 0.00 1,820,379.88
33. Oakland County, Michigan.... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
34. Onandaga County, New York... 400,000.00 (34,146.34) 365,853.66 (42,804.88) 323,048.78 (6,460.98) 316,587.80 0.00 316,587.80
35. Port Angeles, Washington.... 500,000.00 (42,682.93) 457,317.07 (53,506.10) 403,810.98 (8,076.22) 395,734.76 0.00 395,734.76
36. Raleigh-Wake County, NC..... 2,000,000.00 (170,731.71) 1,829,268.29 (214,024.39) 1,615,243.90 (32,304.88) 1,582,939.02 0.00 1,582,939.02
37. Riverside, California....... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
38. San Francisco, California... 1,500,000.00 (128,048.78) 1,371,951.22 (160,518.29) 1,211,432.93 (24,228.66) 1,187,204.27 0.00 1,187,204.27
39. Scranton, Pennsylvania...... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
40. Silicon Valley, California.. 1,500,000.00 (128,048.78) 1,371,951.22 (160,518.29) 1,211,432.93 (24,228.66) 1,187,204.27 0.00 1,187,204.27
41. Spokane, Washington......... 450,000.00 (38,414.63) 411,585.37 (48,155.49) 363,429.88 (7,268.60) 356,161.28 0.00 356,161.28
42. Springfield, Virginia....... 500,000.00 (42,682.93) 457,317.07 (53,506.10) 403,810.98 (8,076.22) 395,734.76 0.00 395,734.76
43. St. Louis, Missouri......... 750,000.00 (64,024.39) 685,975.61 (80,259.15) 605,716.46 (12,114.33) 593,602.13 0.00 593,602.13
44. State of Alaska............. 1,500,000.00 (128,048.78) 1,371,951.22 (160,518.29) 1,211,432.93 (24,228.66) 1,187,204.27 350,000.00 837,204.27
45. State of Idaho.............. 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 350,000.00 441,469.51
46. State of Maryland........... 2,500,000.00 (213,414.63) 2,286,585.37 (267,530.49) 2,019,054.88 (40,381.10) 1,978,673.78 1,978,673.78 0.00
47. State of Minnesota.......... 7,100,000.00 (606,097.56) 6,493,902.44 (759,786.59) 5,734,115.85 (114,682.32) 5,619,433.54 2,000,000.00 3,619,433.54
48. State of Mississippi........ 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 350,000.00 441,469.51
49. State of Missouri........... 500,000.00 (42,682.93) 457,317.07 (53,506.10) 403,810.98 (8,076.22) 395,734.76 350,000.00 45,734.76
50. State of Montana............ 700,000.00 (59,756.10) 640,243.90 (74,908.54) 565,335.37 (11,306.71) 554,028.66 350,000.00 204,028.66
51. State of Nevada............. 575,000.00 (49,085.37) 525,914.63 (61,532.01) 464,382.62 (9,287.65) 455,094.97 350,000.00 105,094.97
52. State of New Jersey......... 3,000,000.00 (256,097.56) 2,743,902.44 (321,036.59) 2,422,865.85 (48,457.32) 2,374,408.54 350,000.00 2,024,408.54
53. State of New Mexico......... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 350,000.00 441,469.51
54. State of New York........... 2,500,000.00 (213,414.63) 2,286,585.37 (267,530.49) 2,019,054.88 (40,381.10) 1,978,673.78 350,000.00 1,628,673.78
55. State of North Dakota....... 1,450,000.00 (123,780.49) 1,326,219.51 (155,167.68) 1,171,051.83 (23,421.04) 1,147,630.79 50,000.00 1,097,630.79
56. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 14,000,000.00 (1,195,121.95) 12,804,878.05 (1,498,170.73) 11,306,707.32 (226,134.15) 11,080,573.17 350,000.00 10,730,573.17
57. State of Texas.............. 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 50,000.00 741,469.51
58. State of Utah............... 3,600,000.00 (307,317.07) 3,292,682.93 (385,243.90) 2,907,439.02 (58,148.78) 2,849,290.24 350,000.00 2,499,290.24
59. State of Washington......... 2,000,000.00 (170,731.71) 1,829,268.29 (214,024.39) 1,615,243.90 (32,304.88) 1,582,939.02 1,582,939.02 0.00
60. State of Wisconsin.......... 1,500,000.00 (128,048.78) 1,371,951.22 (160,518.29) 1,211,432.93 (24,228.66) 1,187,204.27 350,000.00 837,204.27
61. Temucula, California........ 250,000.00 (21,341.46) 228,658.54 (26,753.05) 201,905.49 (4,038.11) 197,867.38 0.00 197,867.38
62. Tucson, Arizona............. 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
63. Volusia County, Florida..... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
64. Warren County, Virginia..... 250,000.00 (21,341.46) 228,658.54 (26,753.05) 201,905.49 (4,038.11) 197,867.38 0.00 197,867.38
65. Wausau-Stevens Point, WI.... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.51 0.00 791,469.51
66. Westchester/Putnam Co., NY.. 500,000.00 (42,682.93) 457,317.07 (53,506.10) 403,810.98 (8,076.22) 395,734.76 0.00 395,734.76
67. White Plains, New York...... 1,000,000.00 (85,365.85) 914,634.15 (107,012.20) 807,621.95 (16,152.44) 791,469.52 0.00 791,469.52
Project Evaluations......... 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,809,073.17 1,809,073.17 0.00 1,809,073.17
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GRAND TOTAL................. $114,800,000.00 ($9,800,000.00) $105,000,004.00 ($12,285,000.00) $92,715,000.00 $0.00 $92,715,000.00 $9,861,612.80 $82,853,387.20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 17214]]
[FR Doc. 99-8569 Filed 4-7-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P