[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 34 (Monday, February 22, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8517-8523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-3520]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[IL175-1a; FRL-6232-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Illinois: Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving the remaining portions of a vehicle
inspection and maintenance (I/M) State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of Illinois on June 29, 1995, which
were conditionally approved by EPA on June 25, 1996. The final approval
of the conditionally approved portions of the plan is based on the
State's June 21, 1997, and December 9, 1998, submittals of additional
documentation addressing the requirements of EPA's conditional
approval. This revision provides for the adoption and implementation of
an enhanced I/M program in both the Chicago severe ozone nonattainment
area and the East St. Louis moderate ozone nonattainment area.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 23, 1999, unless EPA receives
adverse written comments by March 24, 1999. If adverse comment is
received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Written comment should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief,
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Copies of the State submittal are available
for inspection at the following address: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. (It is recommended that you
telephone Francisco Acevedo at (312) 886-6061 before visiting the
Region 5 Office.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francisco J. Acevedo, Environmental
Protection Specialist at (312) 886-6061.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Motor vehicles are significant contributors of volatile organic
compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxide
(NOx) emissions. The motor vehicle inspection and
maintenance program is an effective means of reducing these emissions.
Despite improvements in emission control technology in past years,
mobile sources in urban areas continue to remain responsible for
roughly half of the emissions of VOC causing ozone, and most of the
emissions of CO. They also emit substantial amounts of nitrogen oxides
(NOx) and air toxics. This is because the number of vehicle
miles traveled has doubled in the last 20 years to 2 trillion miles per
year, offsetting much of the technological progress in vehicle emission
control over the same period. Projections
[[Page 8518]]
indicate that the steady growth in vehicle miles will continue.
Under the Clean Air Act (the Act), the EPA is pursuing a three-
point strategy to achieve emission reductions from motor vehicles. The
development and commercialization of cleaner vehicles and cleaner fuels
represent the first two elements of the strategy. These developments
will take many years before cleaner vehicles and fuels dominate the
fleet and favorably impact the environment. This document deals with
the third element of the strategy, vehicle inspection and maintenance,
which is aimed at the reduction of emissions from the existing fleet by
ensuring that vehicles are maintained to meet the emission standards
established by EPA. Properly functioning emission controls are
necessary to keep pollution levels low. The driving public is often
unable to detect a malfunction of the emission control system. While
some minor malfunctions can increase emissions significantly, they do
not affect drivability and may go unnoticed for a long period of time.
Effective I/M programs can identify excessive emissions and assure
repairs. The EPA projects that sophisticated I/M programs such as the
one being approved in this rulemaking for Illinois will identify
emission related problems and prompt the vehicle owner to obtain timely
repairs thus reducing emissions. The Act requires that polluted cities
adopt either a ``basic'' or ``enhanced'' I/M program, depending on the
severity of the pollution and the population of the area. Moderate
ozone nonattainment areas, plus marginal ozone areas with existing or
previously required I/M programs in Census-defined urbanized areas,
fall under the ``basic'' I/M requirements. Basic and enhanced I/M
programs both achieve their objective by identifying vehicles that have
high emissions as a result of one or more malfunctions, and requiring
them to be repaired. An ``enhanced'' I/M program covers more vehicles
in operation in the fleet, employs inspection methods which are better
at finding high emitting vehicles, and has additional features to
better assure that all vehicles are tested properly and effectively
repaired. The Act directed EPA to establish a minimum performance
standard for enhanced I/M programs. The standard is based on the
performance achievable by annual inspections in a centralized test
program. States have flexibility to design their own programs if they
can show that their program is as effective as the model program used
in the performance standard. Naturally, the more effective the program
the more credit a State will get toward the emission reduction
requirement. An effective program will help to offset emissions
associated with growth in vehicle use and allow for industrial and/or
commercial growth.
The EPA and the States have learned a great deal about what makes
an I/M program effective since the Clean Air Act of 1977 first required
I/M programs for polluted areas. There are three major keys to an
effective program:
(1) Given the advanced state of current vehicle design and
anticipated technology changes, the ability to accurately fail problem
vehicles and pass clean ones requires improved test equipment and test
procedures;
(2) Comprehensive quality control and aggressive enforcement are
essential to assuring the testing is done properly; and,
(3) Skillful diagnostics and capable mechanics are important to
assure that failed cars are fixed properly.
These three factors are missing in most older I/M programs.
Specifically, the idle and 2500 RPM/idle short tests and anti-tamper
inspections used in current I/M programs are not as effective in
identifying and reducing in-use emissions from the types of vehicles in
the current and future fleet. Also, covert audits by EPA and State
agencies typically discover improper inspection and testing 50 percent
of the time in test-and-repair stations, indicating poor quality
control. Experience has shown that quality control at high-volume test
only stations is usually much better. And, finally, diagnostics and
mechanics training are often poor or nonexistent in most older I/M
programs.
On November 5, 1992 (57 FR 52950), EPA established a high-tech
emission test for high-tech cars. This I/M test, known as the IM240
test, is so effective that biennial test programs yield almost the same
emission reduction benefits as annual programs. The addition of the
evaporative test increases the benefit even more and results in lower
testing costs. In addition, EPA published changes to the I/M rule in
the Federal Register on October 18, 1995, (60 FR 48029) in order to
provide greater flexibility to States required to implement I/M
programs.
II. Background
The State of Illinois currently contains two ozone nonattainment
areas which are required to implement I/M programs in accordance with
the Act. The Chicago severe-17 ozone nonattainment area contains the
Chicago, Aurora, Crystal Lake, Elgin, Joliet, and Round Lake Beach-
McHenry urbanized areas. The Federal I/M rule requires the Chicago
urbanized area to implement an enhanced I/M program. Since the I/M rule
does not require enhanced I/M programs in severe urbanized areas with a
Census population of less than 200,000, the remaining five cities in
the Chicago nonattainment area were required to implement only a basic
I/M program based on their 1990 Census-defined urbanized area
populations. The East St. Louis moderate ozone nonattainment area
(Metro-East) contains the Illinois portion of the St. Louis and Alton
urbanized areas. Both areas were required to implement a Basic I/M
program in the nonattainment area. On June 29, 1995, the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted to EPA a SIP revision
for the implementation of an enhanced I/M program to cover both the
Chicago and the East St. Louis nonattainment areas. This submittal
includes the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995 (625 ILCS 5/13B)
(``Inspection Law''), which became effective January 18, 1994. That
statute provides authority for IEPA to implement an enhanced I/M
program and meet EPA's requirements for such a program. The Inspection
Law mandates enhanced I/M testing for the Metro-East and the Chicago
ozone nonattainment areas. The Illinois Pollution Control Board (Board)
is required by the Inspection Law to adopt the necessary vehicle
emissions standards, and IEPA is required to adopt equipment
requirements and all necessary procedures for the enhanced I/M testing
program. The standards were required to be adopted as amendments to 35
Illinois Administrative Code 240 (Part 240), and the procedures adopted
as amendments to 35 Illinois Administrative Code 276 (Part 276). The
Illinois submittal of June 21, 1997 included two separate amendments to
the Board I/M standards contained in Part 240 (Board docket numbers
R94-19 and R94-20) effective on December 14, 1994 and December 12,
1994, respectively (18 Ill. Reg. 18228 (December 30, 1994), and 18 Ill.
Reg. 18013 (December 23, 1994)). These amendments include emissions
standards based upon EPA's preferred IM240 loaded mode exhaust
emissions standard. For the Enhanced I/M Program, the IEPA adopted an
initial set of amendments to Agency procedures contained in Part 276
and they became effective on June 14, 1996 (20 Ill. Reg. 8456). On
April 22, 1996, IEPA submitted the State's Enhanced I/M Request-For-
Proposal as part of the Illinois SIP submittal.
[[Page 8519]]
In a proposed rule published in the Federal Register on May 10,
1996 (61 FR 21405), EPA proposed to approve portions of the Illinois
enhanced I/M submittal and to conditionally approve other portions. The
public comment period for the May 10, 1996, notice of proposed
rulemaking closed on June 10, 1996, and no comments were received. EPA
published a final rule approving portions of the Illinois enhanced I/M
submittal and conditionally approving other portions of the plan on
July 25, 1996.
On June 21, 1997, the IEPA submitted the final enhanced I/M
contract and supplemental information in support of the SIP as required
by EPA's July 25, 1996 conditional approval of the Illinois plan. On
December 9, 1998, the IEPA submitted recently adopted amendments to
Part 240 ((22 Ill. Reg. 13723), effective July 13, 1998, and 22 Ill.
Reg. 21120, effective July 13, 1998), and Part 276 ((22 Ill. Reg.
18867) effective September 28, 1998) as the final required elements in
support of the SIP revision. The adopted Board and IEPA agency
regulations and the legislation submitted by Illinois, change the
existing program from a basic I/M program to a fully enhanced I/M
program in both of Illinois' ozone nonattainment areas.
III. EPA's Analysis of Illinois' Enhanced I/M Program
As discussed above, section 182 of the Act requires that States
adopt and implement updated regulations for I/M programs in moderate
and above ozone nonattainment areas. The following sections of this
notice summarize the requirements of the Federal I/M regulations for
those areas that were conditionally approved by EPA on July 25, 1996
and address whether the elements of the State's submittal comply with
the Federal rule.
Network Type and Program Evaluation 40 CFR 51.353
Enhanced I/M programs shall be operated in a centralized test-only
format, unless the State can demonstrate that a decentralized program
is equally effective in achieving the enhanced I/M performance
standard. The enhanced program shall include an ongoing evaluation to
quantify the emission reduction benefits of the program and to
determine if the program is meeting the requirements of the Act and the
Federal I/M regulations. The SIP shall include details on the program
evaluation and a schedule for submittal of biennial evaluation reports,
data from a State monitored or administered mass emission test of at
least 0.1 percent of the vehicles subject to inspection each year,
description of the sampling methodology, the data collection and
analysis system and the legal authority enabling the evaluation
program.
The State legislative authority and the State I/M regulations
provide for a centralized, test-only network. Illinois' centralized,
test only network type is approvable. The submittal includes provisions
for on-going program evaluation to satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR
51.353. Specifically, the State's submittal includes a schedule for
program evaluations and methodologies by which this biennial program
evaluation will be carried out, as required by 40 CFR 51.353. In
addition, the State has committed to submit to EPA biennial program
evaluation reports meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 51.353 starting
at the end of the program's first biennial cycle in July 2001. EPA is
approving this section of the Illinois enhanced I/M SIP.
Vehicle Coverage 40 CFR 51.356
The performance standard for enhanced I/M programs assumes coverage
of all 1968 and newer model year light duty vehicles and light duty
trucks up to 8,500 pounds gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR), and
includes vehicles operating on all fuel types. Other levels of coverage
may be approved if the necessary emission reductions are achieved.
Vehicles registered or required to be registered within the I/M program
area boundaries, and fleets primarily operated within the I/M program
area boundaries belonging to the covered model years and vehicle
classes comprise the subject vehicles. Fleets may be officially
inspected outside the normal I/M program test facilities, if such
alternatives are approved by IEPA, but shall be subject to the same
test requirements using the same quality control standards as non-fleet
vehicles and shall be inspected in independent, test-only facilities,
according to the requirements of 40 CFR 51.353(a).
The Federal I/M regulation requires that the SIP shall include the
legal authority or rule necessary to implement and enforce the vehicle
coverage requirement, a detailed description of the number and types of
vehicles to be covered by the program and a plan for how those vehicles
are to be identified, including vehicles that are routinely operated in
the area but may not be registered in the area, and a description of
any special exemptions, including the percentage and number of vehicles
to be impacted by the exemption.
The Illinois Vehicle Inspection Law of 1995 requires coverage of
all 1968 and newer vehicles registered or required to be registered in
the I/M program area, except those vehicles which run on diesel or
exclusively by electricity. The modeling demonstration submitted with
the SIP includes vehicle coverage of light-duty gasoline vehicles
(LDGV), light-duty gasoline trucks 1 (LDGT1), and light-duty gasoline
trucks 2 (LDGT2). The Illinois legislation provides the legal authority
to implement and enforce the vehicle coverage. This level of coverage
is approvable because it provides the necessary emission reductions.
The State's June 21, 1997, SIP submittal adequately addresses fleet
testing requirements. The State described the extent of the exemption's
impact, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.356 and therefore EPA is approving
this section of the State submittal.
Test Procedures and Standards 40 CFR 51.357
Written test procedures and pass/fail standards are required to be
established and followed for each model year and vehicle type included
in the program. Federal test procedures and standards are found in 40
CFR 51.357 and in the EPA document entitled ``High-Tech I/M Test
Procedures, Equipment Standards, Quality Control Requirements, and
Equipment Specifications'', EPA-AA-EPSD-IM-93-1, finalized in April,
1994 and revised June 1996 and March 1998. 625 ILCS 5/13B provides the
State the authority to establish test procedures according to the needs
of the program. The Illinois submittal includes I/M regulations adopted
by the Board ((R94-19, and R94-20, and R98-24) effective December 14,
1994, December 12, 1994, and July 13, 1998, respectively), which
include emissions standards based upon EPA's preferred IM240 loaded
mode exhaust emissions standard. In 1996, Illinois EPA adopted some
administrative rules to implement many aspects of the Enhanced I/M
program, and these became effective on June 14, 1996 (amendments to 35
Illinois Administrative Code 276 (20 Ill. Reg. 8456) (``Part 276'')).
IEPA adopted the remaining necessary amendments to these rules this
fall, and they have an effectiveness date of September 28, 1998 (22
Ill. Reg. 18867). Therefore, EPA is approving this section of the SIP
based on IEPA's submittal of December 9, 1998 of the adopted and
effective amendments to the Part 240 Board rules, and the Part 276 IEPA
rules.
[[Page 8520]]
Test Equipment 40 CFR 51.358
The Federal regulation requires computerized test systems for
performing any measurement on subject vehicles. The Federal I/M
regulations requires that the State SIP submittal include written
technical specifications for all test equipment used in the program.
The specifications shall describe the emission analysis process, the
necessary test equipment, the required features and written acceptance
testing criteria and procedures.
625 ILCS 5/13B provides the general authority for the State to
establish the designation of official test equipment and testing
procedures. The Illinois submittal also includes I/M regulations which
include emissions standards based upon EPA's preferred IM240 loaded
mode exhaust emissions standard. IEPA has addressed the requirements of
this section in Chapter 4 (Technical Requirements) and Chapter 5
(Administrative Requirements) of the Enhanced I/M RFP and the
contractor's Technical Proposal. EPA is approving this section of the
SIP based on the State's June 21, 1997, submittal of the final signed
contract addressing the requirements of 40 CFR 51.358.
Quality Control 40 CFR 51.359
Quality control measures shall ensure that emission measurement
equipment are calibrated and maintained properly, and that inspection,
calibration records and control charts are accurately created, recorded
and maintained. The Illinois submittal contains general legal authority
in 625 ILCS 5/13B which requires IEPA to establish an enhanced program
containing procedures to assure the correct operation, maintenance and
calibration of test equipment, and also procedures for certifying test
results and for reporting and maintaining relevant data and records.
EPA is approving this section of the SIP based on the State's June 21,
1997, submittal of the final signed contract addressing the quality
control requirements of 40 CFR 51.359 in Chapter 4 (Technical
Requirements) and Chapter 5 (Administrative Requirements) of the
Enhanced I/M RFP and the contractor's Technical Proposal.
Motorist Compliance Enforcement Program Oversight 40 CFR 51.362
The Federal I/M regulation requires that the enforcement program
shall be audited regularly and shall follow effective program
management practices, including adjustments to improve operation when
necessary. The SIP shall include quality control and quality assurance
procedures to be used to insure the effective overall performance of
the enforcement system. An information management system shall be
established which will characterize, evaluate and enforce the program.
The legal authority for the implementation of an I/M program is found
in 625 ILCS 5/13B. This statute provides the authority necessary to
develop and implement the enforcement program oversight element of the
I/M program. The Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) will continue
to enforce the Vehicle Emission Inspection Law of 1995, which requires
SOS to ``suspend either the driving privileges or the vehicle
registration or both, of any vehicle owner who has not complied with
this chapter'' (625 ILCS 5/13B-55). EPA is approving this portion of
the State's plan based on the State's June 21, 1997, submittal of the
final signed I/M contract addressing the requirements of 40 CFR 51.362.
Quality Assurance 40 CFR 51.363
An ongoing quality assurance program shall be implemented to
discover, correct and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse in the program.
The program shall include covert and overt performance audits of the
inspectors, audits of station and inspector records, equipment audits,
and formal training of all state I/M enforcement officials and
auditors. The Illinois submittal contains a general provision under 625
ILCS 5/13B which requires that the State I/M program provide for
procedures to assure the correct operation, maintenance, and
calibration of test equipment. Illinois will continue to implement its
ongoing quality assurance program to discover, correct and prevent
fraud, waste and abuse in the enhanced I/M program. The program will
include both covert and overt performance audits of the inspectors,
audits of the stations and inspection records, equipment audits, and
formal training of all state I/M enforcement officials and auditors.
Chapter 4 (Technical Requirements) and Chapter 5 (Administrative
Requirements) of the Enhanced I/M RFP and the contractor's Technical
Proposal contain numerous provisions which will enable IEPA to continue
this program. EPA is approving this portion of the State's plan based
on IEPA's June 21, 1997, submittal of the final signed I/M contract
addressing the requirements of this section.
Enforcement Against Contractors, Stations and Inspectors 40 CFR 51.364
Enforcement against licensed stations or contractors and inspectors
shall include swift, sure, consistent penalties for violation of
program requirements. The Federal I/M regulation requires the
establishment of minimum penalties for violations of program rules and
procedures which can be imposed against stations, contractors and
inspectors. The legal authority for establishing and imposing
penalties, civil fines, license suspensions and revocations should be
included in the SIP. State quality assurance officials shall have the
authority to temporarily suspend station and/or inspector licenses
immediately upon finding a violation that directly affects emission
reduction benefits. The Illinois submittal includes the legal authority
to establish and impose penalties against station, contractors, and
inspectors. In addition, Chapter 6 (Implementation) of the enhanced I/M
RFP and the contractor's Technical Proposal contain detailed provisions
addressing the requirements of this section, including specific
monetary penalties established for violation of program rules and
procedures. EPA is approving this section of the SIP based on the
State's June 21, 1997, submittal of the final signed I/M contract
addressing such requirements.
Data Collection 40 CFR 51.365
In order to manage, evaluate, and enforce the program requirements,
an effective I/M program requires accurate data collection. The Federal
I/M regulation requires data to be gathered on each individual test
conducted and on the results of the quality control checks of test
equipment required under 40 CFR 51.359. The Illinois submittal contains
a general provision under 625 ILCS 5/13B which requires that the State
I/M program provide for procedures for certifying test results and for
reporting and maintaining relevant data and records. In addition,
Chapter 4 (Technical Requirements) of the Enhanced I/M RFP and the
contractor's Technical Proposal requires that the contractor submit to
IEPA, on a monthly basis, a file containing detailed data for each
vehicle test transaction conducted. The data collection requirements
specified in the final contract meet those specified in 40 CFR 51.365.
EPA is approving this section of the SIP based on the State's June 21,
1997, submittal of the final signed I/M contract addressing the
requirements of this section.
Data Analysis and Reporting 40 CFR 51.366
Data analysis and reporting are required in order to monitor and
evaluate the program by the State and
[[Page 8521]]
EPA. The Federal I/M rule requires annual reports to be submitted to
EPA that provide information and statistics and summarize activities
performed for each of the following programs: testing, quality
assurance, quality control and enforcement. These reports are to be
submitted by July of each year and shall provide statistics for the
period of January to December of the previous year. A biennial report
shall be submitted to EPA that addresses changes in the program design,
regulations, legal authority, program procedures, any weaknesses in the
program found during the previous two year period and how these
problems will be or were corrected. Chapter 4 (Technical Requirements)
of the Enhanced I/M RFP and the contractor's Technical Proposal
contains the necessary provisions addressing the requirements of this
section.
EPA is approving this section of the SIP based on the State's June
21, 1997, submittal of the final signed contract addressing the data
analysis and reporting requirements of 40 CFR 51.366.
Inspector Training and Licensing or Certification 40 CFR 51.367
The Federal I/M regulation requires all inspectors to be formally
trained and licensed or certified to conduct inspections. 625 ILCS 5/
13B requires all inspectors to be certified by IEPA after successfully
completing a course of training and successfully passing a written
test. Chapter 4 (Technical Requirements) of the Enhanced I/M RFP and
the contractor's Technical Proposal requires the contractor to develop
a detailed Management Plan for the implementation and operation of the
contracted elements of the Illinois enhanced I/M program. The
Management Plan must include as part of its elements, a description of
the Personnel Training and Certification Program as described in the I/
M contract. The final contract requires the Contractor to establish and
operate an on-going program to train and certify contractor and IEPA
personnel. EPA is approving this section of the SIP based on the
State's June 21, 1997, submittal of the final signed I/M contract
addressing such requirements.
Public Information and Consumer Protection 40 CFR 51.368
The Federal I/M regulation requires the SIP to include a public
information and consumer protection program. The submittal needs to
include a public information program, which educates the public on I/M,
State, and Federal regulations, air quality, the contribution of motor
vehicles to the air pollution problem, and other items as described in
the Federal rule. A consumer protection program, which includes
provisions for a challenge mechanism, protection of whistle blowers and
assistance to motorists in obtaining warranty covered repair, also
needs to be addressed. IEPA has prepared a comprehensive public
information program meeting the requirements of this section. The
Enhanced I/M contractor will be responsible for developing and
implementing the majority of the public information program according
to the Enhanced I/M contract. Chapter 5 of the Enhanced I/M Contract
requires the contractor to assist IEPA to inform motorists of the need
for emission testing and the benefits derived from regular maintenance
of their vehicles, and cooperate in distributing public information
brochures and/or leaflets to motorists in the inspection lanes. EPA is
approving this section of the Illinois plan.
Improving Repair Effectiveness 40 CFR 51.369
Effective repairs are the key to achieving program goals. The
Federal regulation requires States to take steps to ensure that the
capability exists in the repair industry to repair vehicles. The SIP
should include a description of the technical assistance program to be
implemented, a description of the procedures and criteria to be used in
meeting the performance monitoring requirements required in the Federal
regulation, and a description of the repair technician training
resources available in the community. The Enhanced I/M Contract
contains provisions for the contractor to develop a ``Repair Industry
Plan'' that will be developed and coordinated with IEPA to assist the
industry, especially during the beginning of the operating phase of the
Enhanced I/M program. The contractor will provide direct mailings
providing information on available training and certification. The
contractor will also prepare and distribute to the industry, on a
quarterly basis, a newsletter focusing on emissions-related repair
procedures, unusual or anomalous vehicles, and other information
related to diffusing beneficial repair information. The contractor has
also made arrangements for the repair industry to receive key repair
information from a third-party contractor for a fee. This telephone
service hotline will provide a variety of repair information and will
be linked to the Contractor's computer system to allow real-time access
to test record information. EPA is approving this section of the
Illinois plan.
Compliance With Recall Notices 40 CFR 51.370
States are required to establish a method to ensure that vehicles
subject to enhanced I/M and that are included in either a voluntary
emissions recall as defined at 40 CFR 85.1902(d), or in a remedial plan
determination made pursuant to section 207(c) of the Act, receive the
required repairs prior to completing the emission test or renewing the
vehicle registration. 625 ILCS 5/13B provides the legal authority to
require owners to comply with emission related recalls before
completing the emission test. The Illinois RFP requires that the
contractor provide and maintain as part of the data handling system a
means to identify vehicles with unresolved emissions recalls based upon
the data provided by EPA. At a minimum, the Contractor and IEPA will
have the capability to store, retrieve, and update recall data that
consists of the vehicle identification number, the number of the recall
campaign, and the date that the repairs were performed. The system is
to be capable of interactively updating vehicle and/or recall database
records based upon information supplied by vehicle owners indicating
that required repairs have been made. The system will also be capable
of updating appropriate records based upon updated data provided by
EPA. EPA is approving this section of the Illinois plan.
On-Road Testing 40 CFR 51.371
On-road testing is required in enhanced I/M areas. The use of
either remote sensing devices (RSD) or roadside pullovers including
tailpipe emission testing can be used to meet the Federal regulations.
The program must include on-road testing of 0.5 percent of the subject
fleet or 20,000 vehicles, whichever is less, in the nonattainment area
or the I/M program area. Motorists that have passed an emission test
and are found to be high emitters as a result of an on-road test shall
be required to pass an out-of-cycle test. 625 ILCS 5/13B requires on-
road testing through the use of remote sensing devices. The SIP
submittal requires the use of RSD to test at least 0.5 percent of the
subject fleet per year in the I/M program area. Chapter 4 (Technical
Requirements) of the Enhanced I/M RFP and the contractor's Technical
Proposal requires that the Contractor develop and maintain written on-
road inspection procedures to be approved by IEPA. In addition, the
Contractor is to provide and maintain as part of the system on-
[[Page 8522]]
road testing information containing vehicle and test results obtained
from the on-road testing program. The Contractor will be responsible
for evaluating all on-road emission data, including linking emissions
data with vehicle database records. EPA is approving this section of
the Illinois plan.
IV. Final Rulemaking Action
EPA is approving the sections addressed above as a revision to the
Illinois SIP for an enhanced I/M program. The sections discussed in
this notice were conditionally approved on July 25, 1996, and EPA is
approving them based on the State's June 21, 1997, and December 9,
1998, submittal of the final signed I/M contract and additional
documentation addressing the requirements of EPA's conditional
approval.
The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because EPA
views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal Register
publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the State Plan should
adverse written comments be filed. This rule will be effective without
further notice unless the Agency receives relevant adverse written
comment by March 24, 1999. Should the Agency receive such comments, it
will publish a final rule informing the public that this action will
not take effect. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this action will be effective on April 23, 1999.
V. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, entitled
``Regulatory Planning and Review.''
B. Executive Order 12875
Under E.O. 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not
required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a State, local or
tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those
governments. If the mandate is unfunded, EPA must provide to the Office
of Management and Budget a description of the extent of EPA's prior
consultation with representatives of affected State, local and tribal
governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of written
communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the
need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 12875 requires EPA to
develop an effective process permitting elected officials and other
representatives of State, local and tribal governments ``to provide
meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals
containing significant unfunded mandates.'' Today's rule does not
create a mandate on State, local or tribal governments. The rule does
not impose any enforceable duties on these entities. Accordingly, the
requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875 do not apply to this rule.
C. Executive Order 13045
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O.
12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA
has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children.
If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate
the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on
children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other
potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered
by the Agency. This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does
not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or
safety risks.
D. Executive Order 13084
Under E.O. 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not
required by statute, that significantly affects or uniquely affects the
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by the tribal governments. If the mandate is unfunded,
EPA must provide to the OMB, in a separately identified section of the
preamble to the rule, a description of the extent of EPA's prior
consultation with representatives of affected tribal governments, a
summary of the nature of their concerns, and a statement supporting the
need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to
develop an effective process permitting elected officials and other
representatives of tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and
timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters that
significantly or uniquely affect their communities.'' Today's rule does
not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal
governments. Accordingly, the requirements of section 3(b) of E.O.
13084 do not apply to this rule.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental
jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under
section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act (CAA) do not
create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements that the
State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval
does not create any new requirements, I certify that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship
under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility analysis would constitute
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State action. The
CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds.
Union Electric Co. V. EPA., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C.
7410(a)(2).
F. Unfunded Mandates
Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate;
or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule. EPA has determined that
the approval action promulgated does not include a Federal mandate that
may result in estimated
[[Page 8523]]
annual costs of $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal
action approves pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and
imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State,
local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from
this action.
G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
H. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 23, 1999. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review, nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen oxide, Ozone, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: January 28, 1999.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region V.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart O--Illinois
2. Section 52.720 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(147) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.720 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(147) On June 21, 1997, and December 9, 1998, the State of Illinois
submitted regulations adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board
and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and legislation
adopted by the General Assembly and signed by the Governor related to
Illinois' vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. The purpose
of these submittals was to change the existing program from a basic I/M
program to a fully enhanced I/M program. These changes modify the
program in both the Chicago and Saint Louis (Illinois Portion) Ozone
nonattainment areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental
Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control
Board, Subchapter k: Emission Standards and Limitations for Mobile
sources, Part 240 Mobile Sources, Except for Section 240. Table C.
Adopted at 22 Ill. Reg. 13723, effective July 13, 1998.
(B) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental
Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control
Board, Subchapter k: Emission Standards and Limitations for Mobile
sources, Part 240 Mobile Sources, Section 240. Table C. Corrected at 22
Ill. Reg. 21120, effective July 13, 1998.
(C) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental
Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter II: Environmental
Protection Agency, Part 276 Procedures to be Followed in the
Performance of Inspections of Motor Vehicle Emissions. Amended at 22
Ill. Reg. 18867, effective September 28, 1998.
(ii) Other materials.
(A) Transmittal letters dated June 21, 1997, and December 9, 1998.
(B) Public Act 90-475, effective August 17, 1997. This Act amends
the Illinois Environmental Protection Act by changing Sections 3.32,
3.78, 21, and 22.15 and adding Sections 3.78a and 22.38.
Sec. 52.726 [Revised]
3. Section 52.726 is revised by removing and reserving paragraph
(m).
[FR Doc. 99-3520 Filed 2-19-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P