[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6228-6231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-2782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 207-0114a; FRL-6229-7]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; 
California State Implementation Plan Revision; Amador County Air 
Pollution Control District and Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution 
Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on revisions to the 
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions concern rules 
from the Amador County Air Pollution Control District (ACAPCD) and the 
Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District (NSCAPCD). This 
action will remove these rules from the federally approved SIP. The 
intended effect of this action is to remove rules from the SIP in 
accordance with the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). 
Thus, EPA is finalizing the removal of these rules from the California 
SIP under provisions of the CAA regarding EPA action on SIP submittals 
and SIPs for national primary and secondary ambient air quality 
standards.

DATES: This rule is effective on April 12, 1999, without further 
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by March 11, 1999. If EPA 
receives such comment, then it will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take 
effect.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted to Andrew Steckel at the Region 
IX office listed below. Copies of these rules, along with EPA's 
evaluation

[[Page 6229]]

report for each rule, are available for public inspection at EPA's 
Region IX office during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted 
requests for rescission are also available for inspection at the 
following locations:

Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' Street, 
SW, Washington, DC 20460.
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812.
Amador County Air Pollution Control District, 500 Argonaut Lane, 
Jackson, CA 95642.
Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District, 150 Matheson 
Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448-4908.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yvonne Fong, Rulemaking Office (AIR-
4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, Telephone: (415) 744-1199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Applicability

    The ACAPCD rules being removed from the California SIP are: Rule 
213.2, Organic Solvents; and Rule 213.3, Disposal and Evaporation of 
Solvents. The NSCAPCD rules being removed from the California SIP are: 
Rule 56, Sulfide Emission Standard; Rule 64, Organic Solvents; Rule 
64.1, Architectural Coatings; and Rule 64.2, Disposal and Evaporation 
of Solvents. The ACAPCD adopted Rules 213.2 and 213.3 on July 18, 1972 
and repealed them on June 16, 1981. The NSCAPCD adopted Rules 56, 64, 
64.1, and 64.2 on June 30, 1972 and repealed them on November 10, 1976. 
On September 30, 1997 and October 7, 1997, the ACAPCD and NSCAPCD's 
Boards of Directors respectively adopted resolutions requesting the 
removal of these rules from the California SIP. The California Air 
Resources Board (CARB) submitted to EPA both Districts' requests for 
removal of these rules from the SIP on March 10, 1998.

II. Background

    On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of the ozone and sulfur 
dioxide attainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as 
amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act). 43 FR 8964, 40 CFR 
81.305. The Amador County Area was included among the areas in 
attainment for ozone and the North Coast Air Basin Area, which 
encompasses Northern Sonoma County, was included among the areas in 
attainment for ozone and sulfur dioxide. The rules being addressed in 
this action were originally adopted by the ACAPCD and the NSCAPCD as 
part of their efforts to maintain the National Ambient Air Quality 
Standard (NAAQS) for ozone and sulfur dioxide. These rules were 
originally adopted to control volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions 
from organic solvents, architectural coatings, and the disposal and 
evaporation of solvents and to provide a sulfide emission standard. 
Because the Amador County and North Coast Air Basin Areas have never 
been classified as nonattainment pursuant to Section 107 of the Act for 
the pollutants listed above, these rules were not required by the Act. 
The ACAPCD and NSCAPCD removed these rules from their district rule 
books on June 16, 1981 and November 10, 1976, respectively. The ACAPCD 
and NSCAPCD have certified through resolutions adopted by their Boards 
of Directors on September 30, 1997 and October 7, 1997 that rescission 
of these rules will not result in emissions increases or otherwise 
interfere with any applicable provisions of the CAA.
    On March 10, 1998, ACAPCD and NSCAPCD submitted requests to EPA, 
through CARB, for the removal of ACAPCD Rules 213.2 and 213.3 and 
NSCAPCD Rules 56, 64, 64.1, and 64.2 from the California SIP.

III. EPA Action

    The following ACAPCD rules rescinded by today's action were 
previously approved into the California SIP by EPA:

--Rule 213.2, Organic Solvents, adopted July 18, 1972, approved January 
24, 1978 (43 FR 3275).
--Rule 213.3, Disposal and Evaporation of Solvents, adopted July 18, 
1972, approved January 24, 1978 (43 FR 3275).
    The following NSCAPCD rules rescinded by today's action were 
previously approved into the California SIP by EPA:

--Rule 56, Sulfide Emission Standard, adopted June 30, 1972, approved 
September 22, 1972 (37 FR 19812).
--Rule 64, Organic Solvents, adopted June 30, 1972, approved September 
22, 1972 (37 FR 19812).
--Rule 64.1, Architectural Coatings, adopted June 30, 1972, approved 
September 22, 1972 (37 FR 19812).
--Rule 64.2, Disposal and Evaporation of Solvents, adopted June 30, 
1972, approved September 22, 1972 (37 FR 19812).

    EPA is publishing this document without prior proposal because the 
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
adverse comments. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this 
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document 
that will serve as the proposal to approve these SIP revisions should 
adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective April 12, 1999, 
without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by 
March 11, 1999.
    If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document 
withdrawing this final rule and informing the public that the rule will 
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in 
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. If 
no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule 
will be effective on April 12, 1999 and no further action will be taken 
on the proposed rule.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this 
regulatory action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, Regulatory 
Planning and Review.

B. Executive Order 12875

    Under E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership, EPA 
may not issue a regulation that is not required by statute and that 
creates a mandate upon a state, local, or tribal government, unless the 
Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct 
compliance costs incurred by those governments, or EPA consults with 
those governments. If EPA complies by consulting, E.O. 12875 requires 
EPA to provide to the OMB a description of the extent of EPA's prior 
consultation with representatives of affected state, local, and tribal 
governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of any written 
communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the 
need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 12875 requires EPA to 
develop an effective process permitting elected officials and other 
representatives of state, local, and tribal governments ``to provide 
meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals 
containing significant unfunded mandates.''

[[Page 6230]]

    Today's rule does not create a mandate on state, local or tribal 
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these 
entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875 
do not apply to this rule.

C. Executive Order 13045

    Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is 
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O. 
12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA 
has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. 
If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate 
the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on 
children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other 
potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered 
by the Agency.
    This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does not involve 
decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or safety risks.

D. Executive Order 13084

    Under E.O. 13084, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not required by 
statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the communities of 
Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial direct 
compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal government 
provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance costs 
incurred by the tribal governments, or EPA consults with those 
governments. If EPA complies by consulting, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to 
provide to the OMB, in a separately identified section of the preamble 
to the rule, a description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation 
with representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the 
nature of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue 
the regulation. In addition, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to develop an 
effective process permitting elected and other representatives of 
Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in 
the development of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or 
uniquely affect their communities.''
    Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
communities of Indian tribal governments. Accordingly, the requirements 
of section 3(b) of E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency 
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies 
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small 
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental 
jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a 
substantial number of small entities, but will simply remove 
previously-approved SIP requirements that are no longer in effect. 
Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not create any new 
requirements, I certify that this action will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Moreover, 
due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the Clean Air 
Act, preparation of a flexibility analysis would constitute Federal 
inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air 
Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. 
Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 
7410(a)(2).

F. Unfunded Mandates

    Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; 
or to the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, 
EPA must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome 
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent 
with statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a 
plan for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
    EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not 
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of 
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in 
the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves 
pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new 
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or 
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.

G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

H. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 12, 1999. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds, 
Sulfur oxides.

    Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation 
Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the 
Federal Register on July 1, 1982.

    Dated: January 25, 1999.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

    2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(6)(xvi) and 
(c)(31)(xviii)(E) to read as follows:

[[Page 6231]]

Sec. 52.220  Identification of Plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (6) * * *
    (xvi) Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District.
    (A) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 and now deleted 
without replacement Rules 56, 64, 64.1 and 64.2.
* * * * *
    (31) * * *
    (xviii) * * *
    (E) Previously approved on January 24, 1978 and now deleted without 
replacement Rules 213.2 and 213.3.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 99-2782 Filed 2-8-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P