[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 240 (Tuesday, December 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69128-69132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-33136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-40750; File No. SR-Phlx-98-54]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval to Proposed Rule Change by the 
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Instituting a One-Year Pilot Program 
to Return Phlx Dell Options to Trading on the Phlx Options Trading 
Floor Using Amex Technology

December 4, 1998.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on December 2, 1998, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. 
On December 4, 1998, the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 1 to the 
proposed rule change.\3\ The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons 
and to grant accelerated approval to the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See letter from Edith Hallahan, Deputy General Counsel, 
Phlx, to Michael Walinskas, Deputy Associate Director, Commission, 
dated December 3, 1998 (``Amendment No. 1''). In Amendment No. 1, 
the Exchange proposes Commentaries to Phlx Rules 1051-1055 to 
accommodate the use of Amex technology to trade Phlx Dell options. 
The remaining substance of Amendment No. 1 is incorporated into this 
notice and order granting accelerated approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Phlx proposes to institute a one-year pilot program to return 
Phlx Dell options to the Phlx trading floor from the American Stock 
Exchange, L.L.C. (``Amex'') trading floor using Amex technology on or 
about December 7, 1998. Amex technology would be used to enter, execute 
and process transactions on the Phlx trading floor in Phlx Dell 
options. Despite the use of Amex technology, the Phlx will continue to 
be responsible for surveillance of Phlx Dell options and Phlx 
transaction charges will continue to apply. Phlx rules will also 
continue to apply, except as outlined below.
    The Exchange notes that operational functions respecting these 
options will be handled by Amex systems, including quotation 
processing, booking orders, transaction processing, trade correction, 
and submission to clearing through The Options Clearing Corporation 
(``OCC'').
    The Exchange has re-addressed the application of certain Phlx rules 
that are impacted by Amex technology, determining that the following 
Phlx rules, as discussed below, would not apply or would require 
modification or interpretation: 1051, 1052, 1053, 1054, 1055, and 1080.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Office of 
the Secretary, Phlx and at the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to trade Phlx Dell 
options on the Phlx trading floor using Amex technology on a pilot 
basis for one-year. In addition, the Phlx proposes the ability to 
switch back from Amex to Phlx technology, with certain notification.

[[Page 69129]]

    Background. On June 12, 1998, the Phlx received Commission approval 
to relocate Phlx Dell options to the Amex trading floor on a temporary 
basis.\4\ As part of the relocation, Amex trading systems and 
technology are currently used on the Amex trading floor for automated 
order entry and execution, quotation processing, booking orders, 
transaction processing, trade correction, and clearing through OCC. The 
relocation proposal expires on December 12, 1998.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40088 (June 12, 
1998), 63 FR 33426 (June 18, 1998) (``June Dell options order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the relocation in June, trading in Phlx Dell options has 
significantly increased.\5\ The Exchange believes that the increase in 
volume is due in part to the perception among order flow providers that 
efficient customer order entry and executions have resulted from Amex 
systems. Thus, the Exchange proposes to continue to use Amex technology 
upon the return of Phlx Dell options to the Phlx trading floor. The 
Exchange believes that continuing to use Amex systems may limit 
customer confusion as well as continue to provide efficient order entry 
and executions, based upon the experience in trading Phlx Dell options 
on the Amex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Volume has increased 66% since June from 38,418 contracts 
per day before the move to 50,615 contracts per day after the move. 
Recently, daily volume has exceeded 55,000 contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange continues to implement technological improvements to 
its AUTOM \6\ System, such as upgrading the features of its electronic 
limit order book, the X-Station. Specifically, the Exchange is in the 
process of implementing the X-Station on a floor-wide basis, featuring 
improved cancellation order processing.\7\ The Phlx continues to 
believes that its improvements are benefiting AUTOM users. In addition, 
the Exchange intends to implement other system enhancements, such as 
the inclusion of market data on the X-Station and an alert for quote 
throughs. The Phlx also remains committed to continuing to address 
AUTOM users, including a focus on active options such as Dell. Despite 
the return of Phlx Dell options to the Phlx trading floor using Amex 
technology, all other Phlx options will continue to trade using Phlx 
technology, including the AUTOM System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Phlx Automated Options Market (AUTOM) System is the 
Exchange's electronic order delivery system, which provides 
automatic entry and routing of option orders to the Exchange trading 
floor, pursuant to Phlx Rule 1080.
    \7\ The Exchange notes that improved cancel-replace order 
processing was perceived as one reason to relocate Phlx Dell options 
to the Amex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Phlx Option. Because Phlx Dell options will be processed and 
cleared through Amex systems, a quotation in Phlx Dell options located 
on the Phlx will still appear as an Amex quote. For instance, vendor 
systems may indicate that Dell is an ``Amex'' option. Further, Phlx 
Dell options trades will appear in market data systems as Amex trades 
and may be cleared with other Amex trades. Accordingly, trades cleared 
by OCC may have Amex identifier codes on certain OCC reports. 
Nevertheless, Dell continues to be a Phlx option.\8\ OCC has previously 
advised its members that Phlx Dell options are registered, listed and 
traded under the rules of Phlx.\9\ Phlx Dell options volume will 
subsequently be attributed to the Phlx for various purposes, including 
the determination of Option Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') 
revenues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Exchange intends to seek interpretative relief from 
Commission Rule 10b-10 that representing that an options transaction 
took place on the Amex does not constitute a false statement by the 
broker-dealer issuing the transaction confirmation.
    \9\ Phlx Dell options are currently registered by OCC as 
securities listed on Phlx via a Form 8 amendment under the Act. 
Trading Phlx Dell options using Amex technology in no way suggests 
that these options are listed on the Amex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Due to the use of Amex technology to trade Phlx Dell options, the 
Phlx represents that Amex will be responsible for reporting system 
outages as well as other system events pursuant to the Commission's 
Automation Review Policy (``ARP'') and related regulatory review 
requirements \10\ Phlx also represents that Amex will also be 
responsible for communicating with its systems users regarding system 
outages and changes and other system-related events.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 27445 (Nov. 16, 
1989), 54 FR 48703 (Nov. 24, 1989); and 29185 (May 9, 1991), 56 FR 
22490 (May 15, 1991). ARP I and ARP II are Commission policy 
statements that provide guidelines for the review and assessment of 
information technology resources and supporting trading and 
information dissemination systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Amex Technology--Trade Processing. With respect to option trade 
processing, the Amex and Phlx systems operate differently, primarily 
because of the timing and method of submission of trade participant 
information. Phlx executions are reported as ``matched trades'' through 
the AUTOM System, including complete participant clearing information 
at the time of execution, for submission to OPRA. Also at that time, 
initial comparison has occurred.
    Amex verification and reconciliation, on the other hand, takes 
places throughout the day \11\ via the Intra-Day Clearing (``IDC'') 
system, separate from trade reporting functions. IDC provides an on-
line, input-driven correction facility between member firms and the IDC 
system. IDC terminals are operational throughout the trading day. 
Members with a password have the ability to access uncompared, 
advisory, rejected, and force match option trades. The IDC system 
allows clearing information to be input during the trading day rather 
than at the time of execution, separating and reducing the amount of 
information inputted at the time of execution for trade reporting 
purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Exchange notes that this pertains to manually executed 
orders, such as trades between two Registered Options Traders 
(``ROTs'') or trades manually executed by a floor broker. Orders 
executed through Amex's Auto-Ex system or by the specialist through 
Amex Options Display Book, however, are automatically entered upon 
execution into the IDC system as a compared traded similar to Phlx 
trades. See Amendment No. 1, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result of these differences in trade processing by Amex 
systems, Phlx Rules 1051-1055 are affected. Rule 1051, General 
Comparison and Clearance Rule, provides that all Exchange options 
transactions shall be reported to the Exchange at the time of execution 
for comparison of trade information at the specialist's post and all 
compared transactions shall be cleared through the OCC. Proposed 
Commentary .01 will clarify that utilizing Amex technology for Phlx 
Dell options results in the submission of some, but not all, trade 
information at the specialist's post, as clearing and detailed 
participant information would follow via IDC.
    Rule 1052, Responsibility Of Clearing Options Member For Exchange 
Options Transactions, places responsibility on clearing member 
organizations to clear Exchange options transactions. Proposed 
Commentary .01 will clarify that Phlx Dell options trading on Amex 
technology are ``Exchange'' transactions for this purpose as well.
    Phlx Rules 1053, Filing of Trade Information, and 1054, 
Verification Of Contracts and Reconciliation Of Uncompared Trades, 
require certain trade information should be supplied or verified at the 
time of execution.\12\ These rules also provide that such information 
should be in a form prescribed by the Exchange, and, respectively, in 
accordance with procedures established by the Exchange. The Phlx 
proposes that, with respect to an option trading using Amex

[[Page 69130]]

technology, some trade information (such as clearing and participant 
information) need not be reported at the time of execution at the 
specialist post and that these are Exchange transactions for the 
purposes of Rule 1053 and 1054.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Phlx Option Floor Procedure Advice F-2 will apply to Phlx 
Dell options trading using Amex technology, such that it is the duty 
of the largest participant to report the trade. In the event that 
there is only one buyer and seller, the seller is required to report 
the trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Phlx Rule 1055, Reporting Of Compared Trades To Options Clearing 
Corporation, will continue to apply to Dell options as it requires the 
Exchange to furnish OCC with a report of all compared trades based on a 
comparison service performed by the Exchange on that day, which will 
incorporate the IDC system described above. Proposed Commentary .01 
stats that Amex technology shall furnish the report and perform the 
comparison service referred to in this Rule. In addition, the proposal 
deletes a reference to Rule 1075 \13\ in Rule 1055.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The Commission notes that Phlx does not currently have a 
Rule 1075. As such, the deletion of this reference from Rule 1055 is 
not a substantive change.
    \14\ See Amendment No. 1, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Amex Technology--Automated Order Entry and Execution. Amex 
technology \15\ regarding automated options order routing occurs 
through the Common Message Switch (``CMS'').\16\ The Exchange shall 
provide prior written notice to the Exchange membership describing key 
elements of Amex technology and the resulting order routing 
implications. With respect to contra-side participation for 
automatically executed trades, Amex's Auto-Ex feature rotates among 
trading crowd participants (specialists and ROTs) separately for puts 
and calls, which differs from the single ```Wheel'' for each option in 
the AUTOM system. Thus, the Wheel provision of Phlx Rule 1080 and Floor 
Procedure Advice F-24 cannot apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ This is not intended to be a complete description of Amex 
technology regarding automated options order routing. This limited 
description is provided merely to identify the impact of trading 
Phlx Dell options using Amex technology on Phlx rules.
    \16\ The proposed rule change to temporarily relocate Phlx Dell 
options to the Amex referred to the Amex Order File and related sub-
systems such as the Amex Options Display Book (``AODB''), Touch 
Order Entry Terminal (``TOETS''), and Auto-ex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Advice F-24(e), the Phlx assigns contra party 
participation on the Wheel by assigning a certain number of contracts 
to each participant signed onto the Wheel per each order. Whereas the 
Amex Auto-Ex system distributes the entire order on a rotational basis 
to each participant. In addition, the rotation among participants is 
different, as specialist participation on the Phlx Wheel, as enumerated 
in Advice F-24, depends upon the Auto-Ex guarantee in that option. This 
aspect of Advice F-24(e) will not apply to Phlx Dell options.
    Liability.
    With respect to the liability provisions of Phlx By-Law Article 
XII, Section 12-11 as well as other liability-related provisions in 
Amex rules,\17\ the use of the facilities clearly includes Phlx Dell 
options trading on the Phlx, despite the use of Amex technology. Thus, 
non-liability for damages sustained by a member or member organization 
growing out of the use by such member organization of the facilities 
afforded by the Exchange for the conduct of their business should be 
extended to Amex systems. In trading Phlx Dell options using Amex 
technology, the Phlx, its members, member organizations and employees 
shall accept the same limitations on the liability of Amex, as provided 
in the Amex Constitution and Rules with respect to the use of Amex 
technology systems for the conduct of business, as such limitations 
apply to any Amex member, member organization or employee thereof.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See also Phlx Rule 1080(e)
    \18\ In the proposal, the Phlx codifies the limitation of Amex 
liability to Phlx members in proposed Commentary .03 to Phlx Rule 
1080. Proposed Commentary .03 also provides that Phlx members may 
not copy, modify, disclose, damage, improve or create derivative 
works from, sublease, assign or in any other way permit use by any 
other third party of such Amex technology. See Amendment No. 1, 
supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Other Phlx rule implications. Phlx Dell options will continue to be 
traded under Phlx rules, including minimum trading increments, strike 
price intervals, and position and exercise limits. Phlx Rule 1080 and 
Floor Procedure Advice F-24, regarding contra-side participation 
continue to apply to automated orders, to the extent its provisions 
conform to Amex technology and except as otherwise described herein. 
For instance, Amex parameters will apply regarding the maximum order 
size eligible for electronic delivery.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Currently, such maximum size is 50 contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Survelliance. although Phlx Dell options continue to be Phlx 
options, utilizing Amex technology necessitates that surveillance data 
be generated by the Amex and submitted to the Phlx on a next-day basis. 
The Phlx incorporates such data into its existing surveillance 
procedures and generates similar surveillance reports respecting Phlx 
Dell options. Certain surveillance data, such as block trades, may be 
forwarded to the Phlx in the form of reports depending upon technical 
and operational factors, and such data would then be incorporated into 
Phlx surveillance procedures. Other than the reliance on Amex for data 
and large block trade reports, surveillance of Phlx Dell options will 
remain the responsibility of Phlx.
    Transaction Fees. Phlx transaction fees will continue to apply to 
Phlx Dell options, thus, Phlx will be responsible for transaction fee 
billing and collection in accordance with such Phlx procedures. The 
Phlx anticipates that fees to the Phlx respecting Amex systems use will 
be determined by an agreement with the Amex. Similar to surveillance 
matters, data-sharing will be necessary in order for all such billing 
to be complete.
    Deputization of Amex floor brokers. When Phlx Dell options 
temporarily relocated to the Amex trading floor, another method for 
order entry was through a deputized Amex floor broker. Deputization 
involved a waiver of compliance with Phlx's rules governing floor 
brokers and the requirements for membership. However, with the return 
of Phlx Dell options to the Phlx trading floor, such deputization is no 
longer necessary; Phlx floor brokers will resume providing this 
additional method of order entry.
    Notification. Prior to the return of Phlx Dell options to the Phlx 
trading floor, the Exchange will also notify all member firms of the 
change in trading location, emphasizing the continuation of Amex 
technology. The Exchange has conducted training sessions for floor 
personnel regarding Amex systems. As stated above, the Exchange will 
also distribute memoranda regarding the differences in trade reporting 
and pre-clearing procedures between the Phlx Dell options trading on 
Amex technology and the Phlx options trading on Phlx technology 
throughout the Phlx trading floor. Because Phlx Dell options will 
continue to be traded using Amex technology, the larger system and 
order routing changes that were required upon initial relocation to the 
Amex in June should not result. Nevertheless, the Exchange plans to 
notify its members, as well OCC, of the return to the Phlx trading 
floor.
    The Exchange believes that using Amex systems for Phlx Dell options 
on the Phlx trading floor should provide consistency for members and 
investors as well as a continuation of efficient order execution. The 
Phlx also continues to improve upon its own technology for the 
remainder of the Phlx options floor, as discussed above. Termination of 
its technology arrangement with Amex, formal or informal, or the 
inability of Amex technology to function properly, as reasonably 
determined by the Exchange, would warrant a switch to Phlx technology. 
The Exchange would

[[Page 69131]]

provide prior written notice to the Commission, Phlx members, OCC and 
the Amex should such a switch be necessary.
2. Statutory Basis
    For the reasons discussed above, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6 of the Act in 
general, and in particular, with Section 6(b)(5), \20\ in that it is 
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster 
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system, as well as to protect investors and the public interest by 
maintaining consistency in the order entry and execution for Phlx Dell 
options trading on the Phlx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any inappropriate burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions 
should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also 
be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the 
Exchange. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-98-54 and 
should be submitted by January 5, 1999.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Commission finds that Phlx's proposal to institute a one-year 
pilot program to trade Phlx Dell options on the Phlx trading floor 
using Amex technology is consistent with the requirements of the Act 
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national 
securities exchange. Specifically, the Commission finds that the 
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) \21\ in that 
the arrangement between Phlx and Amex fosters cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in regulation, clearing, settling, 
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions 
in securities.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \22\ In approving this rule, the Commission has considered the 
proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital 
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to the proposed Commentaries to Exchange Rules 1051-
1055, the Commission believes that the proposed rule changes are 
reasonable and consistent with the Act as a temporary measure to 
conform Phlx rules with the use of Amex technology. Although the 
Commission believes that the proposed rule changes are necessary to 
allow Phlx Dell options to be traded on the Phlx trading floor using 
Amex technology, the Commission has concerns regarding a number of 
aspects of the proposal. The Commission recognizes that importing Amex 
technology to the Phlx is critical to the Phlx being able to properly 
handle trading of Dell options on their trading floor. We observe that 
the technology being used has not been tailored to permit trading of 
Dell options in a manner that would be consistent with existing Phlx 
rules.\23\ As noted above, the Exchange is committed to implementing 
technological improvements to its current electronic systems including 
its electronic limit order book, the X-Station.\24\ The Commission 
expects that the Exchange will endeavor to continue to improve its 
technology to enable Phlx Dell options to trade on Phlx in a manner 
consistent with existing Phlx Rules. The Commission believes that the 
existing proposal is not a desirable long-term solution for trading 
Phlx Dell options. The trading processing requirements and Wheel 
assignment rules applicable to Phlx-traded Dell options are being 
utilized out of necessity rather than by choice--they are embedded in 
the Amex technology that Phlx believes is necessary in order to 
maintain fair and orderly markets in Phlx Dell options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See supra Section II--Amex Technology--Trade Processing.
    \24\ See supra Section II--Background.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the filing, Phlx also proposed an amendment to Rule 1080, 
disclaiming Amex's liability to Phlx members for damages growing out of 
the use and enjoyment of Amex's technology and imposing liability on 
Phlx members for the misuse or damage of the Amex technology. In the 
June Dell options order, the Commission approved an interpretation of 
Phlx By-Law Article XII, Section 12-11, which disclaims Phlx's 
liability to Phlx members for damages growing out of the use and 
enjoyment of Phlx's facilities, extending that limitation of liability 
to the Amex.\25\ The Commission continues to believe that this 
limitation of liability of the Amex \26\ to Phlx members growing out of 
the use and enjoyment of the Amex technology is reasonable and 
consistent with the Act. This Commentary to Rule 1080 merely codifies 
the currently existing understanding between Phlx members and the Amex 
as stated in the June Dell options order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See June Phlx Dell options order, supra note 4.
    \26\ The Commission notes that, in the June Phlx Dell options 
order, the limitation of liability only involved the Amex where in 
this filing, the limitation of liability includes the National 
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD''). This is due to 
the recent merger of the Amex and the NASD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the proposal, the Exchange represents that the Amex will be 
responsible for reporting system outages as well as other systems 
events pursuant to the Commission's ARP policy and related regulatory 
review requirements.\27\ The Commission agrees that, because Amex 
technology is being used, the Amex may be in the best position to 
report system outages and other system events. Nonetheless, the 
Exchange is ultimately responsible for ensuring that such outages and 
system events are reported to the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See supra Section II--Phlx Option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Commission notes that, to minimize investor confusion 
in the trading of Phlx Dell options, Phlx has stated that it will 
provide adequate notice to its members to ensure that they and the 
investing public are aware that Phlx Dell options are listed, traded, 
and supervised according to Phlx rules, but are to be traded using Amex 
technology on the Phlx trading floor.
    The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule 
change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of 
notice thereof in the

[[Page 69132]]

Federal Register. Granting accelerated approval to the proposal will 
enable the Exchange to return Phlx Dell options to the Phlx options 
trading floor prior to the expiration of the Phlx Dell options order. 
Accordingly, the Commission believes that good cause exists, consistent 
with Section 6(b)(5) and Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, to grant 
accelerated approval to the proposed rule change.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5) and 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\29\ that the proposed one-year pilot program (SR-Phlx-98-54) is 
approved on an accelerated basis through December 6, 1999.

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-33136 Filed 12-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M