[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 195 (Thursday, October 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54106-54107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-27009]


 ========================================================================
 Notices
                                                 Federal Register
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
 or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
 and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
 delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
 statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
 appearing in this section.
 
 ========================================================================
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 195 / Thursday, October 8, 1998 / 
Notices  

[[Page 54106]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Genesis Placer Claim, Suction Dredging Nez Perce National Forest, 
Idaho County, ID

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; intent to prepare environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact 
statement (EIS) to analyze and disclose the environmental effects of 
dredging on the Genesis placer claim on Red River. The claimant has 
proposed using one eight-inch suction dredge and one five-inch suction 
dredge to remove possible gold deposits from the gravel and at bedrock 
in Red River. The operation is proposed for five years, to be operated 
when water and weather conditions allow. The Genesis placer claim is 
located in Section 6, T28N, R9E, BPM.

DATES: Written comments and suggestions should be received on or before 
November 9, 1998 to receive timely consideration in the preparation of 
the draft EIS.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments and suggestions on the proposed action 
or requests for a map of the proposed action or to be placed on the 
project mailing list to Michael R. McGee, Acting District Ranger, Red 
River Ranger District, P.O. Box 416, Elk City, Idaho 83525.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jo Ellis, District Geologist, Red River Ranger District, P.O. Box 416, 
Elk City, Idaho 83525, phone (208) 842-2245.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed action is proposed pursuant to 
the 1872 Mining Law, the Organic Administration Act of 1897 and Forest 
Service mining regulations, Title 36 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR), 
Part 228, Subpart A. The United States mining laws at 30 U.S.C. 21-54 
confer a statutory right to enter upon the public land to search for 
and remove certain minerals. The Forest Service has the responsibility 
to make sure that the activities are conducted so as to minimize 
adverse environmental impacts to National Forest System lands, 36 CFR, 
Part 228, Subpart A.
    The proposal involves processing 5,517 cubic yards of river gravel 
over a 1,590 length of Red River. A 25-foot wide section of the river, 
approximately three feet deep, would be worked. This work would take 
place over five years or more whenever water and weather conditions 
allow operations. The process involves utilizing high pressure water 
pumps driven by gasoline-powered motors which create suction in a 
flexible intake pipe. A mixture of streambed sediment and water is 
vacuumed into the intake pipe and passed over a sluice box mounted on a 
floating barge. Dense particles (including gold) are trapped in the 
sluice box. The remainder of the entrained material is discharged into 
the stream as tailings or spoils. A hole is created in the gravel so 
bedrock is exposed. Cracks in the bedrock are then cleaned with the 
suction. Large boulders or rootwads are moved by cables attached to a 
winch.
    The Forest Service will consider a range of alternatives to the 
proposed action. One of these will be the ``no action'' alternative, in 
which the Plan of Operations would not be approved. Additional 
alternatives will examine varying intensity and duration of the 
proposed activities, including restrictions on the size of equipment 
and length of seasonal operation, as well as respond to the issues and 
other resource values.
    Public participation is an important part of the project, 
commencing with the initial scoping process (40 CFR 1501.7), which 
starts with publication of this notice and continues for the next 30 
days. In addition, the public is encouraged to visit with Forest 
Service officials at any time during the analysis and prior to the 
decision. The Forest Service will be seeking information, comments, and 
assistance from Federal, State, and local agencies, the Nez Perce 
Tribe, and other individuals or organizations who may be interested in 
or affected by the proposed action.
    Comments from the public and other agencies will be used in 
preparation of the draft EIS. The scoping process will be used to:
    1. Identify potential issues;
    2. Identify major issues to be analyzed in depth;
    3. Eliminate minor issues or those which have been covered by a 
relevant previous environmental analysis, such as the Nez Perce 
National Forest Plan EIS;
    4. Identify alternatives to the proposed action;
    5. Identify potential environmental effects of the proposed action 
and alternatives (i.e., direct, indirect, and cumulative effects.
    While public participation in this analysis is welcome at any time, 
comments received within 30 days of this notice will be especially 
useful in the preparation of the draft EIS, which is expected to be 
filed with the Environmental Protection Agency and available for public 
review in January 1999. A 45-day comment period will follow publication 
of a Notice of Availability of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. 
The comments received will be analyzed and considered in preparation of 
a final EIS, which is expected to be filed in June 1999. A Record of 
Decision will be issued not less than 30 days after publication of a 
Notice of Availability of the final EIS in the Federal Register.
    The Forest Service believes it is important at this early stage to 
give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
draft EISs must structure their participation in the environmental 
review of the proposal in such a way that it is meaningful and alerts 
an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee 
Nuclear Power Corp v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 513 (1978). Also, 
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage 
but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS may be 
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 
1016, 1022 (9th Cir, 1986), and Wisconsin Heritages Inc. v. Harris, 490 
F.Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis., 1980). Because of these court rulings, 
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action 
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period in order that 
substantive comments and objections are available to the Forest Service 
at a

[[Page 54107]]

time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the 
final EIS. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering 
issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments should be as 
specific as possible. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on 
Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural 
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in 
addressing these points.
    Michael R. McGee is the responsible official for this environmental 
impact statement.

    Dated: September 28, 1998.
Michael R. McGee,
Acting District Ranger, Red River Ranger District, Nez Perce National 
Forest, P.O. Box 416, Elk City, ID 83525.
[FR Doc. 98-27009 Filed 10-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M