[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 189 (Wednesday, September 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52275-52276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-26082]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. 98P-0425, 98P-0506, and 98P-0621]
Medical Devices; Exemptions From Premarket Notification; Class II
Devices
Agency: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of
petitions requesting exemption from the premarket notification
requirements for certain class II devices. FDA is publishing this
notice in order to obtain comments on these petitions in accordance
with procedures established by the Food and Drug Administration
Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA).
DATES: Written comments by October 30, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on this notice to the Dockets
Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather S. Rosecrans, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-404), Food and Drug
Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-594-
1190.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Background
Under section 513 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
act) (21 U.S.C. 360c), FDA must classify devices into one of three
regulatory classes: Class I, class II, or class III. FDA classification
of a device is determined by the amount of regulation necessary to
provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Under the
Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (the 1976 amendments (Pub. L. 94-
295)), as amended by the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (the SMDA
(Pub. L. 101-629)), devices are to be classified into Class I (general
controls) if there is information showing that the general controls of
the act are sufficient to assure safety and effectiveness; into class
II (special controls), if general controls, by themselves, are
insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls to provide such assurance; and into class III (premarket
approval), if there is insufficient information to support classifying
a device into class I or class II and the device is a life-sustaining
or life-supporting device or is for a use which is of substantial
importance in preventing impairment of human health, or presents a
potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury.
Most generic types of devices that were on the market before the
date of the 1976 amendments (May 28, 1976) generally referred to as
preamendment devices) have been classified by FDA under the procedures
set forth in section 513(c) and (d) of the act through the issuance of
classification regulations into one of these three regulatory classes.
Devices introduced into interstate commerce for the first time on or
after May 28, 1976 (generally referred to as postamendment devices) are
classified through the premarket notification process under section
510(k) of the act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)). Section 510(k) of the act and the
implementing regulations, 21 CFR part 807, require persons who intend
to market a new device to submit a premarket notification report
(510(k)) containing information that allows FDA to determine whether
the new device is ``substantially equivalent'' within the meaning of
section 513(i) of the act to a legally marketed device that does not
require premarket approval.
On November 21, 1997, the President signed into law FDAMA (Pub. L.
105-115). Section 206 of FDAMA, in part, added a new section 510(m)(1)
of the act which requires FDA, within 60 days after enactment of FDAMA,
to publish in the Federal Register a list of each type of class II
device that does not require a report under section 510(k) of the act
to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Section
510(m) of the act further provides that a 510(k) will no longer be
required for these devices upon the date of publication of the list in
the Federal Register. FDA published that list in the Federal Register
of January 21, 1998 (63 FR 3142).
Section 510(m)(2) of the act provides that, 1 day after the date of
publication of the list under section 510(m)(1), FDA may exempt a
device on its own initiative or upon petition of an interested person,
if FDA determines that a 510(k) is not necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. This section
requires FDA to publish in the Federal Register a notice of intent to
exempt a device, of the petition, and to provide a 30-day comment
period. Within 120 days of publication of this document, FDA must
publish in the Federal Register its final determination regarding the
exemption of the device that was the subject of the notice. If FDA
fails to respond to a petition under this section within 180 days of
receiving it, the petition shall be deemed granted.
II. Criteria for Exemption
There are a number of factors FDA may consider to determine whether
a 510(k) is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of a class II device. These factors are discussed in the
guidance the agency issued on February 19, 1998, entitled ``Procedures
for Class II Device Exemptions from Premarket Notification, Guidance
for Industry and CDRH Staff.'' That guidance can be obtained through
the World Wide Web on the CDRH Home Page at ``http://www.fda.gov/cdrh''
or by facsimile through CDRH Facts-on-Demand at 1-800-899-0381 or 301-
827-0111. Specify ``159'' when prompted for the document shelf number.
III. List of Petitions
FDA has received the following petitions requesting an exemption
from premarket notification for class II devices:
[[Page 52276]]
1. Abbott Laboratories, 21 CFR 862.1715 Triiodothyronine uptake
test system devices.
2. Radiological Imaging Technology, 21 CFR 892.5050, Film Dosimetry
System, a.k.a. Film Scanning System.
3. Getinge/Castle, Inc., 21 CFR 878.4580 Surgical Lamps.
IV. Comments
Interested persons may, on or before October 30, 1998, submit to
the Dockets Management Branch (address above) written comments
regarding this notice. Two copies of any comments are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be
identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. The petitions and received comments may be seen in the
office above between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: September 23, 1998.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-26082 Filed 9-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F