[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 173 (Tuesday, September 8, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47419-47423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-24016]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 173 / Tuesday, September 8, 1998 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 47419]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 51
[Docket No. 98-016-2]
Brucellosis; Increased Indemnity for Cattle and Bison
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final rule, with two changes, an interim
rule that amended the regulations governing Federal indemnity paid
under the brucellosis eradication program to increase the amount of
indemnity that may be paid for certain cattle and bison destroyed
because of brucellosis. The interim rule described two indemnity
methods--an appraisal method and a fixed-rate method--from which owners
of certain animals approved for destruction may choose. As amended by
this document, the rule now allows owners to receive Federal indemnity
for unweaned, neutered calves in herds approved for depopulation, and
the fixed-rate indemnity method now accounts for the higher value of
registered beef cattle and dairy cattle compared to nonregistered beef
cattle and bison. This action will provide sufficient financial
incentive for cattle and bison owners to depopulate brucellosis-
affected herds. The continued existence of these herds increases the
risk of disease spread and prolongs the eradication process.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 8, 1998.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Valerie Ragan, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, National Animal Health Programs Staff, VS, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 36, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231, (301) 734-3754.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in part 78 of title 9 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) govern the interstate movement of cattle, bison, and
swine to help prevent the interstate spread of brucellosis, a
contagious disease affecting animals and humans caused by bacteria of
the genus Brucella. In humans, brucellosis initially causes flulike
symptoms, but the disease may develop into a number of chronic
conditions, such as arthritis. In cattle and bison, brucellosis causes,
among other things, decreased milk production and loss of young through
abortion or birth of weak calves. Humans can be treated for brucellosis
with antibiotics; there is no feasible means of curing brucellosis in
food animals.
The regulations in part 78 are part of a cooperative Federal and
State program, administered by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), to eradicate
brucellosis from the United States. Program officials are striving to
eradicate the field strain of Brucella abortus from domestic cattle and
bison herds by the end of December 1998. Among other things, the
regulations in part 78 provide a system for classifying States or
portions of States (areas) according to the rate of B. abortus
infection present and the general effectiveness of the brucellosis
control and eradication program in the State or area. The
classifications are Class Free, Class A, Class B, Class C, and
quarantined States and areas, with Class Free States being those in
which there has been no finding of brucellosis in cattle or bison for
the 12 months preceding classification and quarantined States and areas
being those States and areas with the highest rates of brucellosis. As
of July 31, 1998, there were only 8 known affected cattle herds and 1
known affected bison herd, and APHIS had declared 43 States, Puerto
Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands free of the disease.
Brucellosis is commonly transmitted to susceptible animals by
direct contact with infected animals. The disease is also transmitted
to susceptible animals in contact with an environment that has been
contaminated by discharges from infected animals. Infected pregnant
cows may discharge billions of Brucella bacteria at calving or
abortion. Although it is not common, infected bulls can spread the
disease to cows during breeding. Because brucellosis is transmitted by
sexually intact animals, steers and spayed heifers do not pose a risk
of transmitting brucellosis.
The basic approach to brucellosis eradication in cattle and bison
has been to test cattle and bison for infection and send sexually
intact infected and exposed animals to slaughter. Brucellosis-exposed
cattle and brucellosis-exposed bison have a high probability of
contracting brucellosis, and may, in fact, be contagious before they
react to an official test for brucellosis. Because the continued
presence of brucellosis in a herd seriously threatens the health of
animals in that herd and other herds, the prompt destruction of
sexually intact brucellosis-affected cattle or bison is critical to the
success of the eradication program.
To encourage destruction of sexually intact cattle and bison that
are infected with or that have been exposed to brucellosis, USDA pays
Federal indemnity to owners of certain animals that are destroyed
because of brucellosis. The regulations governing indemnification under
the brucellosis eradication program are in 9 CFR part 51 (referred to
below as the regulations). Without sufficient financial incentive to
destroy exposed animals or depopulate affected herds, many owners
prefer to quarantine exposed animals or, when the exposed animals in a
herd cannot be isolated, the entire herd. Quarantining is a lengthy and
expensive process for both the owner and USDA. USDA has to pay to have
the quarantined herd tested periodically, until the herd is found to be
free of brucellosis, and the owner may not sell or move any animals
while they are under quarantine, except for slaughter, which provides
less revenue than sales for breeding purposes.
In an interim rule effective March 24, 1998, and published in the
Federal Register on March 31, 1998 (63 FR 15281-15284, Docket No. 98-
016-1), we amended the regulations to provide additional financial
incentive for owners to choose depopulation when USDA offers to pay
indemnity for destruction of a herd. We amended Sec. 51.3, ``Payment to
owners for animals destroyed,'' by changing the system of determining
the indemnity to be paid for all cattle and bison destroyed under
[[Page 47420]]
the program, except for individual reactors and sexually intact exposed
female calves that are not part of a whole-herd depopulation.
As a result of the interim rule, the Administrator may authorize
the payment of indemnity by USDA to any owner of the following animals
destroyed under the brucellosis eradication program: (1) Cattle and
bison identified as reactors as a result of a complete herd test and
any sexually intact exposed female calves (defined in Sec. 51.1 as ``a
female bovine less than 6 months of age that is nursed by a brucellosis
reactor at the time such reactor is condemned, and that has not been
altered to make it incapable of reproduction''), (2) cattle and bison
in a herd that has been approved by APHIS for depopulation, and (3)
brucellosis-exposed cattle and brucellosis-exposed bison that were
previously sold or traded from any herd that has, subsequent to the
sale or trade, been found to be affected with brucellosis.
For individual cattle and bison identified as reactors on a
complete herd test and for any sexually intact exposed female calves,
the interim rule provided a fixed indemnity rate: $250 for any
registered cattle and nonregistered dairy cattle and $50 for any bison,
nonregistered cattle other than dairy cattle, or sexually intact
exposed female calves. For cattle and bison herds that have been
approved for depopulation and for brucellosis-exposed cattle and
brucellosis-exposed bison that meet the conditions described above, the
interim rule allowed owners to choose an appraisal method or a fixed-
rate method for determining the indemnity amounts. As specified in the
interim rule, under the appraisal method, the indemnity is the
appraised market value of the animal minus the salvage value, and under
the fixed-rate method, the indemnity will not exceed $250 per animal.
The method chosen must be used for all animals to be destroyed.
According to the interim rule, owners have the option of having an
appraisal of their animals done prior to choosing the method used.
Appraisals are conducted by an independent appraiser selected by the
APHIS Administrator, and the cost of the appraisals is borne by APHIS.
In all cases, the amount of Federal indemnity is determined in
accordance with the regulations that were in effect on the date that
reactors were found or the date that depopulation or removal of
individual exposed animals was approved. Prior to payment of indemnity,
proof of destruction 1 must be furnished to the Veterinarian
in Charge. The Administrator shall authorize the maximum per-head
amount for animals approved for indemnity under the brucellosis
eradication program unless: (1) Sufficient funds are not available, (2)
the State or area in which the animal is located is under Federal
quarantine, (3) the State does not request payment of Federal
indemnity, or (4) the State requests a rate lower than the maximum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Veterinarian in Charge shall accept any of the following
documents as proof of destruction: (a) A postmortem report; (b) a
meat inspection certification of slaughter; (c) a written statement
by a State representative, APHIS representative, or accredited
veterinarian attesting to the destruction of the animal; (d) a
written, sworn statement by the owner or caretaker of the animal
attesting to the destruction of the animal; (e) a permit (VS Form 1-
27) consigning the animal from a farm or livestock market directly
to a recognized slaughtering establishment; or (f) in unique
situations where the documents listed above are not available, other
similarly reliable forms of proof of destruction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We solicited comments concerning the interim rule for 60 days
ending June 1, 1998. We received 14 comments by that date. The comments
were from cattle industry associations, State departments of
agriculture, and veterinary associations. All of the commenters were in
favor of the intent of the interim rule: Many stated that increased
indemnification is important for the rapid completion of the
brucellosis eradication program because some producers have been
reluctant to depopulate their affected herds. However, all but one of
the commenters requested changes to the provisions of the interim rule.
The suggestions made in the comments are discussed in detail below.
The comments primarily dealt with two concerns. The most prevalent
suggestion was to allow cows and nursing calves in herds approved for
depopulation to be appraised as a pair because these animals are
generally worth more as a unit than as individuals.
The second most prevalent suggestion was to allow indemnity to be
paid for all unweaned calves in herds approved for depopulation and to
exempt any neutered calves from ``B'' branding and slaughter
requirements. (Currently, the regulations allow for indemnity to be
paid for sexually intact calves of both sexes but not for spayed
heifers or steers, with the exception of work oxen, because neutered
animals do not present a threat of spreading brucellosis. However, a
common herd-management practice involves neutering nursing calves,
especially the males. Owners of herds approved for depopulation are
reluctant to slaughter cows with nursing calves that have been neutered
because these calves are not eligible for indemnity and feeding
unweaned calves is a labor-intensive and frequently unsuccessful
undertaking.) The commenters expressed concern that owners of herds
approved for depopulation may either delay depopulation until the
neutered calves can be weaned (generally at about 6 months of age) or
opt to test the herd with removal of reactors until the herd qualifies
for release from quarantine. In either case, the herd remains as a
potential source of disease transmission for an extended period of
time. Several commenters stated that herd owners whose management
practices include neutering of calves are ``seriously disadvantaged''
by the provisions in the interim rule.
One commenter stated that it is important to pay adequate indemnity
to the owners of cows with nursing bull calves. The commenter stated
that 4 to 6 months after weaning, the nursing bull calf becomes a
valuable steer worth approximately $500. Without being offered adequate
indemnity, owners of exposed cows with nursing bull calves may resist
depopulation. The commenter further stated that either ``an indemnity
option to encourage such owners to depopulate should be provided'' or
the Federal fixed indemnity should be increased by $100 and the States
should be permitted to apply State indemnity funds to address this
issue.
One commenter suggested several other changes to the regulations.
(1) State clearly that bull calves are eligible for indemnity. These
calves would include weaned and unweaned bull calves that are to be
used for breeding and unweaned bull calves that are not to be used for
breeding. (2) Require destruction of all sexually intact males and
females for which indemnity is paid. However, bull calves under 18
months of age for which indemnity is paid could be castrated and not
destroyed and exempted from reactor tagging and ``B'' branding
requirements. (3) For the purpose of herd depopulation, define a
``steer'' as a castrated male that has been weaned and a ``not weaned
steer'' as a castrated male that has not been weaned. Allow indemnity
to be paid for not weaned steer calves and exempt these calves from
reactor tagging, ``B'' branding, and slaughter.
One commenter ``encourages APHIS to continue to vigorously attack
the remaining vestiges of this contagious disease affecting animals and
humans.'' The commenter urged that, as the
[[Page 47421]]
eradication program winds down, APHIS continue adequate monitoring and
surveillance at first points of market concentration and/or slaughter
to prevent reinfection of the Nation's cattle herd from undetected
animals.
Our final rule incorporates some of the suggestions made in the
comments.
We agree with the comments about the increased value of cow--calf
pairs over individual animals, and the appraisals made under the
brucellosis program already take into account the increased value of
such pairs. We further believe that adequate indemnity is currently
offered for both weaned and unweaned bull calves and that no
clarification needs to be made to the regulations regarding the
eligibility of bull calves for indemnity. We also do not believe that
definitions of steer and bull calves need to be added to the
regulations. However, we will amend the regulations to allow for
payment of indemnity for certain neutered calves as explained below.
In regard to the suggestions regarding unweaned calves in herds
approved for depopulation, we recognize the problems described
previously for herd owners caused by slaughtering cows that have
nursing calves. We have decided to offer herd owners indemnity for
unweaned, neutered cattle and bison in herds approved for depopulation.
We are changing the regulations in paragraph (d) of Sec. 51.9, ``Claims
not allowed,'' to allow for such payment. However, for reasons
described below, we are not changing our regulations to incorporate the
suggestion to allow indemnity to be paid for these calves but not
require them to be destroyed.
As with all other animals for which Federal indemnity is provided
under the brucellosis eradication program, we will require that owners
of unweaned, neutered cattle and bison in herds approved for
depopulation send these unweaned calves to slaughter or otherwise
destroy them in accordance with the regulations in order to receive
indemnity for them. Although these animals do not pose a threat of
spreading brucellosis, we believe that it is important to require their
destruction because we do not want to establish a situation in which it
is financially beneficial for owners to have brucellosis infection in
their herds. By providing indemnity for these calves and then allowing
the owners to keep them, the possibility exists that the owners could
profit from this action if the animals are raised and then sold at a
later date. As stated previously, our goal in providing indemnification
to owners under the brucellosis eradication program is to provide
sufficient financial incentive to encourage destruction of infected and
exposed animals. Therefore, we are not amending the requirement in
Sec. 51.3 of the regulations that owners must provide proof of
destruction of their animals in order to collect Federal indemnity for
them. We are also not amending the requirements in Sec. 51.5, which
specifies methods of identification, including an option for ``B''
branding, for animals to be destroyed. Owners who choose to seek
Federal indemnity for unweaned, neutered calves in herds approved for
depopulation must identify and move these calves to slaughter in
accordance with Sec. 51.5 of the regulations and provide proof of
destruction for them in accordance with Sec. 51.3 of the regulations.
In regard to the comment concerning continued efforts by APHIS to
identify and eliminate the last vestiges of brucellosis, we recognize
the need to ensure adequate monitoring and surveillance to detect and
eliminate any newly discovered sources of the disease and are committed
to continuing efforts in this regard.
We are also making a change to the interim rule to correct an
inadvertent omission. As stated previously, the interim rule specifies
that, for owners of herds and individual exposed animals that qualify
for either the appraisal method or the fixed-rate method of indemnity,
the indemnity rate under the fixed-rate method shall not exceed $250
per animal. For reasons explained below, the interim rule should have
stated that, under the fixed-rate system, the indemnity shall not
exceed $250 per animal for bison and nonregistered cattle other than
dairy cattle and $750 per animal for registered cattle and
nonregistered dairy cattle. We are amending the language in Sec. 51.3
(a)(2)(ii)(B) accordingly.
Prior to publication of the interim rule, the indemnity regulations
for herd depopulation in States other than Class Free States took into
account the higher value of dairy cattle and registered beef cattle in
comparison with bison and nonregistered beef cattle. The former
regulations provided that, in States other than Class Free States, the
indemnity for animals in herds depopulated because of brucellosis would
not exceed $250 per animal for any bison and nonregistered cattle other
than dairy cattle and the lesser of 95 percent of appraised value minus
salvage value or $750 for any registered cattle or nonregistered dairy
cattle. The regulations essentially provided a fixed-rate system with
an appraisal component in States other than Class Free States: For
regulated animals with comparatively lower values (bison and
nonregistered beef cattle), the indemnity was capped at $250; for
regulated animals with comparatively higher values (registered beef
cattle and dairy cattle), the indemnity was capped at $750.
As stated previously, under the new indemnity system established by
the interim rule, owners of herds approved for depopulation must choose
one of the two methods (appraisal or fixed rate) for all of the animals
in the herd. While the appraisal method obviously accounts for
differences in value of animals, the fixed-rate method ($250 per
animal) does not account for any differences in value. In changing the
former indemnity regulations to the interim rule, we inadvertently
omitted under the fixed-rate method the higher rates (up to $750 per
animal) that had been in place under the former regulations for
registered animals and dairy cattle in States other than Class Free
States.
Under the interim rule, owners of nonregistered beef cattle herds
are expected to choose the fixed-rate method because the rate of $250
per animal plus salvage value is fair compensation for these animals;
owners of registered beef cattle herds are expected to choose the
appraisal method because $250 per animal plus salvage value is
inadequate compensation for such animals. Owners of beef cattle herds
with a mixture of registered and nonregistered animals would have to
choose the appraisal method to obtain adequate compensation for all
their animals. However, in certain situations, the fixed-rate method
can be advantageous to both APHIS and the owner, i.e., APHIS can avoid
the cost of conducting the appraisals, and the owner can receive the
indemnity money quickly. To make the fixed-rate method under the
interim rule commensurate with the former indemnity regulations, which
accounted for the higher value of registered beef cattle and dairy
cattle, we are splitting the fixed-rate method into the two levels
described above. This change in the fixed-rate method should not cause
a significant difference in program expenditures and will facilitate
depopulation of affected herds with a mixture of registered and
nonregistered animals.
Therefore, based on the rationale set forth in the interim rule and
in this document, we are adopting the provisions of the interim rule as
a final rule with the changes discussed in this document.
This final rule also affirms the information contained in the
interim rule concerning Executive Orders 12372
[[Page 47422]]
and 12988 and the Paperwork Reduction Act. Because the emergency nature
of the interim rule made compliance with section 603 and timely
compliance with section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.) impracticable, we are addressing the Regulatory
Flexibility Act in this document as set forth below.
Effective Date
This is a substantive rule that relieves restrictions concerning
the payment of indemnity for certain cattle and bison. Therefore,
pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, it may be made effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
In its effort to eradicate brucellosis, an infectious and
contagious bacterial disease affecting animals and humans, the Federal
Government offers indemnity payments to owners of cattle and bison
destroyed because of brucellosis in accordance with the regulations in
9 CFR part 51. As completion of the brucellosis eradication program
approaches, whole-herd depopulation of affected herds has become
critical. Program officials recently determined that the Federal
indemnity payments needed to be increased to provide sufficient
incentive for owners to agree to depopulate herds. When whole-herd
depopulation is necessary, producers incur costs related not only to
animal loss, but also to transactions, including expenses of gathering
and loading, transportation, and commission fees. Furthermore, with the
loss of an entire herd, producers suffer production losses; dairy
operations lose milk production, and beef operations lose calves.
Registered herds may experience the irretrievable loss of valuable
breeding characteristics.
In an interim rule published in the Federal Register on March 31,
1998, (63 FR 15281-15284, Docket No. 98-016-1), APHIS increased the
Federal indemnity payments under the brucellosis eradication program to
better reflect the appraised value, or fair market value, of certain
animals destroyed under the program. Program officials believe that the
increased payments will provide the necessary inducement for producers
to depopulate affected herds and replace slaughtered animals with
healthier ones. The continued existence of these herds increases the
risk of disease spread and prolongs the eradication process.
In 1997, the total number of cattle and bison in the United States
was approximately 101.2 million, valued at about $53 billion. Gross
income of the U.S. cattle industry was about $31 billion, and total
U.S. earnings from exports of live cattle, beef, and veal was
approximately $2.6 billion. More than 97 percent of the 1,167,910 U.S.
cattle and bison operations had gross cash values of less than
$500,000, which, according to standards for agricultural producers set
by the Small Business Administration, categorizes these operations as
small entities.
The number of brucellosis-affected herds varies over time.
According to an informal APHIS estimate, for each herd in quarantine,
program officials expect the possible existence of two potential
suspect herds. As of July 31, 1998, eight cattle herds and one bison
herd were under quarantine. However, only six herds (all owned by
persons considered to be small entities) were potential candidates for
depopulation. Five were nonregistered beef herds with a total of
approximately 1,367 head of cattle, and one was a registered beef herd
with about 155 head.
According to the indemnity regulations in place prior to
publication of the interim rule, the producers accepting herd
depopulation would have received $250 per head as indemnity payment for
bison and nonregistered beef cattle destroyed and the lesser of either
95 percent of appraised value minus salvage value or $750 for any
registered cattle or nonregistered dairy cattle. In addition to these
Federal indemnity payments, these owners would have received the
salvage value for each animal and possibly a State supplement to the
Federal indemnity payment.
In 1997, beef and cull dairy cows sold for slaughter brought an
average of $270 salvage value per 900-lb animal. The replacement cost
of a nonregistered beef cow with calf averaged $750, and a cow with no
calf, $500. A replacement cow from a registered beef herd averaged
$1,200. These figures show that, even before taking into account the
other costs, the total compensation (the sum of the salvage value and
the indemnity amounts in place at that time) paid to a nonregistered
herd owner still fell short of the replacement costs. Specifically, the
shortfall averaged $230 per nonregistered beef cow with calf. As a
result, many producers would not opt for whole-herd depopulation if
offered. The continued existence of affected herds can result in the
spread of brucellosis, hindering the eradication process and increasing
long-term costs.
Under this final rule, which gives producers of herds approved for
depopulation the option of receiving a fixed rate for their animals or
an amount based on an appraisal, it is anticipated that many producers
will choose the fixed-rate method for claiming indemnity for bison and
nonregistered beef cattle and the appraisal method for registered
cattle and nonregistered dairy cattle. For owners of bison and
nonregistered beef cattle, the value per animal would be about $520
(the fixed rate plus the estimated salvage value), which is very close
to the market value of the animals. Owners of registered cattle and
nonregistered dairy cattle would not incur a direct market loss because
the new indemnity payments would amount to the appraised market value
of the live animals minus the salvage value realized. Owners of herds
comprising registered and nonregistered beef cattle could choose either
indemnity method to receive adequate compensation for their animals as
a result of a change from the interim rule to the final rule that split
the flat rate into two levels--$250 for bison and nonregistered beef
cattle and $750 for registered beef cattle and dairy cattle. Another
change from the interim rule to the final rule is the inclusion in the
indemnity payment program of neutered calves that are nursing cows in
herds approved for depopulation. These calves were formerly excluded
from eligibility for indemnity. This change will have an additional
mitigating impact on the losses certain producers would incur through
herd depopulation.
The cost to APHIS for paying indemnity to the six eligible herd
owners if they had decided to participate in whole-herd depopulation
under the former indemnity regulations would have been approximately
$322,375; the cost to APHIS under the regulations created by the
interim and final rules would be approximately $352,450--a difference
of $30,075. (We estimate that $26,625 of that total is the result of
paying indemnity for the neutered calves.) Because keeping potentially
diseased animals or having a herd under quarantine creates a severe
competitive disadvantage, these producers can be expected to
participate in whole-herd depopulation if their losses are reasonably
reduced. These figures do not take into account any currently
unidentified affected herds for which APHIS may want to encourage
depopulation in the future. However, the total compensation that APHIS
will provide in fiscal year 1998 will be limited by available
appropriated
[[Page 47423]]
funding and will not exceed $3.41 million on a nationwide basis.
Compared with the value of the U.S. cattle industry and its
importance to the national economy, the actual costs of increased
indemnity for depopulating all animals in all brucellosis-affected
herds is small. Competitiveness in the international market depends
upon a reputation for producing high-quality, disease-free animals.
Both the actual product and the purchasers' perception of the product's
quality contribute to continued world market acceptance. While isolated
brucellosis outbreaks resulting in relatively small potential losses in
cattle production can reduce the confidence of importers and cause a
loss of trade, the damage that would result from a widespread
brucellosis infection would be extremely costly and harmful to U.S.
gross national income. Therefore, efforts to eradicate brucellosis and
secure the health of the cattle industry continue to serve the economic
interests of the Nation. The increased indemnity payments promulgated
by this rule are expected to provide a stronger incentive for whole-
herd depopulation of affected cattle. This rule should result in
savings to the eradication program because the rule will facilitate the
program's progress. The overall effect of this rule upon supply, price,
and competitiveness is expected to be minor or none.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 51
Animal diseases, Cattle, Hogs, Indemnity payments, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, we are amending 9 CFR part 51 as follows:
PART 51--ANIMALS DESTROYED BECAUSE OF BRUCELLOSIS
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 111-113, 114, 114a, 114a-1, 120, 121, 125,
and 134b; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d).
2. In Sec. 51.3, paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(B) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 51.3 Payment to owners for animals destroyed.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Fixed-rate method. The indemnity shall not exceed $250 per
animal for bison and nonregistered cattle other than dairy cattle and
$750 per animal for registered cattle and nonregistered dairy cattle.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 51.9, paragraph (d) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 51.9 Claims not allowed.
* * * * *
(d) If the animals are:
(1) Barrows or gilts maintained for feeding purposes; or
(2) Spayed heifers or steers, unless the steers are work oxen, or
unless the spayed heifers or steers are unweaned animals in a herd
approved for depopulation in accordance with Sec. 51.3 of this part.
* * * * *
Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of August, 1998.
Joan M. Arnoldi,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 98-24016 Filed 9-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P