[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46814-46816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-23612]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, 
Washington, DC 20549.
Extension:
    Form N-2, SEC File No. 270-21, OMB Control No. 3235-0026
    Form N-5, SEC File No. 270-172, OMB Control No. 3235-0169
    Form N-8A, SEC File No. 270-135, OMB Control No. 3235-0175
    Rule 17f-5, SEC File No. 270-259, OMB Control No. 3235-0269

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
requests for extension of the previously approved collections of 
information discussed below.

Form N-2--Registration Statement of Closed-end Management Investment 
Companies

    Form N-2 is the form used by closed-end management investment 
companies (``closed-end funds'') to register as investment companies 
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 [15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.] 
(``Investment Company Act'') and to register their securities under the 
Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.] (``Securities Act''). 
Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77e] requires the filing of 
a registration statement prior to the offer of securities to the public 
and that the statement be effective before any securities are sold. The 
primary purpose of the registration process is to provide disclosure of 
financial and other information to investors and potential investors 
for the purpose of evaluating an investment in a security. Section 5(b) 
of the Securities Act requires that investors be provided with a 
prospectus containing the information required in a registration 
statement prior to the sale or at the time of confirmation or delivery 
of the securities.
    A closed-end fund is required to register as an investment company 
under Section 8(a) of the Investment Company Act [15 U.S.C. 80a-8(a)]. 
Form N-2 permits a closed-end fund to provide investors with a 
prospectus covering essential information about the fund when the fund 
makes an initial or additional offering of its securities. More 
detailed information is provided to interested investors in the 
Statement of Additional Information (``SAI''). The

[[Page 46815]]

SAI is provided to investors upon request and without charge.
    The Commission uses the information provided in Form N-2 
registration statements to determine whether closed-end funds have 
complied with the requirements of the Investment Company Act.
    We estimate that closed-end funds file 44 initial registration 
statements and 39 amendments to registration statements--a total of 83 
filings--on Form N-2 each year. Based on consultations with a sample of 
recent filers, we estimate that the hour burden to prepare and file an 
initial Form N-2 filing is 500 hours and the hour burden to prepare an 
amendment is 100 hours. The total hour burden for all closed-end funds 
filing Form N-2 is 25,900 hours per year.
    Filing a registration statement on Form N-2 is mandatory for 
closed-end funds before making a public offering. Responses will not be 
kept confidential.

Form N-5--Registration Statement of Small Business Investment Companies

    Form N-5 is the integrated registration statement form adopted by 
the Commission for use by a small business investment company which has 
been licensed as such under the Small Business Administration and has 
been notified by the Administration that the company may submit a 
license application, to register its securities under the Securities 
Act and to register as an investment company under section 8 of the 
Investment Company Act. The purpose of registration under the 
Securities Act is to ensure that investors are provided with material 
information concerning securities offered for public sale that will 
permit investors to make informed decisions regarding such securities. 
The Commission reviews the registration statements for the adequacy and 
accuracy of the disclosure contained therein. Without Form N-5, the 
Commission would be unable to carry out the requirements to the 
Securities Act and Investment Company Act for registration of small 
business investment companies. The respondents to the collection of 
information are small business investment companies seeking to register 
under the Investment Company Act and to register their securities for 
sale to the public under the Securities Act. The estimated number of 
respondents is two and the proposed frequency of response is annually. 
The estimate of the total annual reporting burden of the collection of 
information is approximately 352 hours per respondent, for a total of 
704 hours. Providing the information on Form N-5 is mandatory. 
Responses will not be kept confidential.

Form N-8A--Notification of Registration of Investment Companies

    Form N-8A is the form that investment companies file to notify the 
Commission of the existence of active investment companies. After an 
investment company has filed its notification of registration under 
section 8(a) of the Investment Company Act, the company is then subject 
to the provisions of the Act which govern certain aspects of its 
organization and activities, such as the composition of its board of 
directors and the issuance of senior securities. Form N-8A requires an 
investment company to provide its name, state of organization, form of 
organization, classification, if it is a management company, the name 
and address of each investment adviser of the investment company, the 
current value of its total assets and certain other information readily 
available to the investment company. If the investment company is 
filing simultaneously its notification of registration and registration 
statement, Form N-8A requires only that the registrant file the cover 
page (giving its name, address and agent for service of process) and 
sign the form in order to effect registration.
    The Commission uses the information provided in the notification on 
Form N-8A to determine the existence of active investment companies and 
to enable the Commission to administer the provisions of the 1940 Act 
with respect to those companies. Each year approximately 266 investment 
companies file a notification on Form N-8A, which is required to be 
filed only once by an investment company. The Commission estimates that 
preparing Form N-8A requires an investment company to spend 
approximately one hour so that the total burden of preparing Form N-8A 
for all affected investment companies is 266 hours.
    The collection of information on Form N-8A is mandatory. The 
information provided on Form N-8A is not kept confidential.

Rule 17f-5--Custody of Investment Company Assets Outside the United 
States

    Rule 17f-5 under the Investment Company Act permits registered 
management investment companies (``funds'') to maintain their assets in 
custody arrangements outside the United States. The Commission adopted 
comprehensive amendments to rule 17f-5 on May 12, 1997.\1\ The 
amendments became effective on June 16, 1997, but funds are not yet 
required to comply with most of the amendments.\2\ Funds may comply 
with either prior rule 17f-5 or with the rule as amended in 1997 until 
February 1, 1999.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Custody of Investment Company Assets Outside the United 
States, Investment Company Act Release No. 22658 (May 12, 1997) [62 
FR 26923 (May 16, 1997)].
    \2\ The original compliance date for the 1997 amendments was 
June 16, 1998. The Commission has extended this compliance date for 
most of the amendments to February 1, 1999. The extension does not 
apply to the amended definitions of ``eligible foreign custodian,'' 
``qualified foreign bank,'' and ``U.S. bank,'' for which the 
compliance date remains June 16, 1998.
    \3\ Certain amended definitions would apply under either version 
of the rule. See supra note 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Before rule 17f-5 was amended in 1997, the rule permitted funds to 
maintain their assets with certain foreign banks and securities 
depositories subject to certain conditions. The fund's board of 
directors had to approve (i) each country where fund assets were 
maintained, (ii) each foreign bank or depository that held the assets, 
and (iii) a written contract that had to contain specified provisions 
governing each foreign custody arrangement. Notes to the rule listed 
factors that the board was required to consider when investing assets 
in foreign countries and placing them with foreign custodians. The rule 
also required the fund board to monitor each foreign custody 
arrangement and to approve it at least annually.
    As amended in 1997, rule 17f-5 permits a fund's board of directors 
to play a more traditional oversight role by delegating its 
responsibilities for foreign custody arrangements to a U.S. or foreign 
bank custodian or the fund's investment adviser or officers 
(collectively with the board, the ``foreign custody manager''). The 
board can delegate different responsibilities to different persons. The 
board must find that it is reasonable to rely on each delegate it 
selects. The delegate must agree to exercise reasonable care, prudence, 
and diligence or to adhere to a higher standard of care in performing 
the delegated responsibilities. The board must require the delegate to 
provide, at times that the board deems reasonable and appropriate, 
written reports that notify the board when the fund's assets are placed 
with a particular foreign custodian and when any material change occurs 
in the fund's foreign custody arrangements.
    When the foreign custody manager selects a particular ``eligible 
foreign

[[Page 46816]]

custodian,'' \4\ the foreign custody manager must determine that, based 
on its consideration of specified factors, the fund's assets will be 
subject to reasonable care if maintained with that custodian. The 
foreign custody manager also must determine that, based on the same 
factors, the written contract that governs each custody arrangement 
with the foreign custodian (or the set of depository rules or practices 
or the combination of a contract and rules or practices) will provide 
reasonable care for fund assets. The written contract (or equivalent 
rules or practices) must contain either certain specified provisions, 
or other provisions that provide the same or a greater level of care 
for fund assets. In addition, the foreign custody manager must 
establish a system to monitor the contract that governs each custody 
arrangement and the appropriateness of maintaining the fund's assets 
with a particular foreign custodian.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ ``Eligible foreign custodians'' under the rule generally 
include foreign banks and trust companies, national or transnational 
securities depositories, and majority-owned subsidiaries of U.S. 
banks or bank holding companies. The compliance date for this 
amended definition of eligible foreign custodian remains June 16, 
1998.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The collections of information required under rule 17f-5 are 
intended to further the protection of fund assets held in foreign 
custody arrangements permitted under the rule, which are more flexible 
than the foreign custody arrangements permitted under the Act. The 
requirement that the fund board determine that it is reasonable to rely 
on each delegate is intended to ensure that the board considers 
carefully each delegate's qualifications to perform its 
responsibilities. The requirement that the delegate provide written 
reports to the board is intended to ensure that the delegate notifies 
the board of important developments concerning custody arrangements so 
that the board may exercise effective oversight.
    The requirement that each custody arrangement be governed by a 
written contract (or equivalent rules or practices) that contains 
specified provisions or other provisions that provide an equivalent 
level of care is intended to ensure that each arrangement is subject to 
certain minimal contractual safeguards.\5\ The requirement that the 
foreign custody manager establish a monitoring system is intended to 
ensure that the foreign custody manager periodically reviews each 
custody arrangement and takes any action necessary or appropriate when 
changes in circumstances could threaten fund assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The requirement that the foreign custody manager determine 
that the custody contract (or equivalent rules or practices) will 
provide reasonable care for fund assets is intended to ensure that 
the foreign custody manager weights the adequacy of contractual 
obligations when it determines whether the foreign custodian will 
maintain the fund's assets with reasonable care.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission estimates that during the first year when funds are 
required to comply with the 1997 amendments to rule 17f-5, the boards 
of directors of approximately 3,690 portfolios that use foreign custody 
arrangements will delegate responsibility for their arrangements to 
approximately 15 U.S. bank custodians and approximately 650 investment 
advisers.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Commission estimates that these 3,690 portfolios are 
divided among approximately 1,327 registered funds within 
approximately 650 fund complexes that may share the same board of 
directors, U.S. bank custodian, investment adviser, or all these 
entities. The board of directors and its foreign custody delegates 
for a fund complex could therefore meet rule 17f-5's requirements by 
making similar arrangements for an average of 6 portfolios at the 
same time. The Commission also estimates that each portfolio has 
foreign custody arrangements with an average of 10 foreign 
custodians (i.e., 1 bank and 1 securities depository in each of 5 
countries).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission estimates that the board of each portfolio will 
expend approximately 2 burden hours during the first year in 
determining that the board may reasonably rely on each of two delegates 
to evaluate the portfolio's foreign custody arrangements, for a total 
of 7,380 burden hours for all 3,690 portfolios. The Commission 
estimates that each U.S. custodian bank will expend approximately (i) 
400 burden hours in determining for some 250 portfolios that a written 
contract containing required terms governs each foreign custody 
arrangement and that each contract will provide reasonable care for 
fund assets; (ii) 96 burden hours in establishing a system for 
monitoring custody arrangements and contracts; and (iii) 400 burden 
hours in providing periodic reports to fund boards; for a total of 
13,440 burden hours for all 15 U.S. bank custodians. The Commission 
estimates that each investment adviser will expend approximately (i) 10 
burden hours in determining for some 6 portfolios that a written 
contract containing required terms governs each foreign custody 
arrangement and that each contract will provide reasonable care for 
fund assets; (ii) 24 burden hours in establishing a system for 
monitoring certain arrangements and contracts; and (iii) 10 burden 
hours in providing periodic reports to fund boards; for a total of 
28,600 burden hours for all 650 investment advisers.
    The total annual burden of the rule's paperwork requirements for 
all portfolios, U.S. bank custodians, and investment advisers therefore 
is estimated to be 49,420 hours. This estimate represents an increase 
of 40,680 hours from the prior estimate of 8,740 hours. Approximately 
30,680 hours of the increase are attributable to updated information 
about the number of affected portfolios and other entities, and to a 
more accurate calculation of the component parts of some information 
burdens. Approximately 10,000 hours of the increase are attributable to 
the adoption of rule amendments not fully addressed in the prior 
estimate.
    Compliance with the collection of information requirements of the 
rule is necessary to obtain the benefit of relying on the rule.
    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the 
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate is not derived 
from a comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the 
costs of Commission rules.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Written comments regarding the above information should be directed 
to following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Officer Building, 
Washington, D.C. 20503; and (ii) Michael E. Bartell, Associate 
Executive Director, Office of information Technology, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: August 25, 1998.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-23612 Filed 9-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M