[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 158 (Monday, August 17, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43898-43900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-22059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[FRL-6146-1]


National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; 
National Priorities List

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of intent for partial deletion of Source Areas 1, 2, 3, 
7, 8, 9 and 10 from the Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination Superfund 
Site, Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina, from the National 
Priorities List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 
Region IV, announces its intent to delete Source Areas 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 
9, and 10 from the Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination (Bypass 601) 
National Priorities List (NPL) Site, located in Concord, Cabarrus 
County, North Carolina, and requests public comment on this proposed 
action. The NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which is the 
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 
promulgated by EPA, pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 
1980, as amended. EPA and the State of North Carolina Department of 
Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR) have determined that Source 
Areas 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10 pose no significant threat to public 
health or the environment and, therefore, additional CERCLA remedial 
measures are not appropriate.
    This notice of intent to delete pertains to both soil and 
groundwater at the seven (7) source areas mentioned above. The 
contamination, which was a result of the disposal practices of the 
Martin Scrap Recycling (MSR) Facility, has been remediated. The 
remainder of the source areas are being addressed by ongoing CERCLA 
activities.

DATES: EPA will accept comments concerning its partial deletion 
proposal until September 16, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Giezelle S. Bennett, US EPA, 
Region IV, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, GA 30303.
    Comprehensive information on this Site is available through the EPA 
Region IV public docket, which is located at EPA's Region IV office and 
is available for viewing by appointment from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Requests for appointments or 
copies of the background information from the regional public docket 
should be directed to the EPA Region IV docket office.
    The address for the regional docket office is Ms. Debbie Jourdan, 
US EPA, Region IV, 61 Forsyth St, SW, Atlanta, GA 30303. The telephone 
number is 404-562-8862. Background information from the regional public 
docket is also available for viewing at the Site information repository 
located at the Charles A. Cannon Memorial Library, 27 Union Street, 
North, Concord, NC 28025. The telephone number is 704-788-3167.

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact either Giezelle Bennett or 
Diane Barrett at 1-800-435-9233, US EPA Region IV, 61 Forsyth St, SW, 
Atlanta, GA 30303.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Intended Source Area Deletions

I. Introduction

    This document is to announce EPA's intent to delete Source Areas 1, 
2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the Bypass 601 Site from the NPL. It also 
serves to request public comments on the partial deletion proposal.
    EPA identifies sites that appear to present a significant risk to 
public health, welfare, or environment and maintains the NPL as the 
list of these sites. Sites on the NPL qualify for remedial responses 
financed by the Hazardous Substances Response Trust Fund (Fund). As 
described in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL 
remain eligible for Fund-financed remedial actions in the unlikely 
event that conditions at the Site warrant such actions. EPA accepts 
comments on the proposal to delete a Site from the NPL for thirty (30) 
days after publication of this document in the Federal Register.

II. NPL Deletion Criteria

    The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites or 
delete parts of sites from the NPL. In accordance with Sec. 300.425(e) 
of the NCP, sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response 
is appropriate. In making this determination, EPA, in consultation with 
the State, considers whether the site has met any of the following 
critieria for site deletion:
    (1) Responsible or other parties have implemented all appropriate 
response actions required.
    (2) All appropriate response actions under CERCLA have been 
implemented and no further response actions are deemed necessary.
    (3) Remedial investigation has determined that the release poses no 
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore, 
no remedial action is appropriate.

III. Deletion Procedures

    EPA Region IV will accept and evaluate public comments before 
making a final decision to delete. Comments from the local community

[[Page 43899]]

may be the most pertinent to deletion decisions. The following 
procedures were used for the intended deletion of Source Areas 1, 2, 3, 
7, 8, 9, and 10 from the Bypass 601 Site:
    (1) EPA Region IV has recommended deletion and has prepared the 
relevant documents.
    (2) The State has concurred with the decision to delete Source 
Areas 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10.
    (3) Concurrent with this announcement, a notice has been published 
in the local newspaper and has been distributed to appropriate federal, 
state, and local officials announcing the commencement of a 30-day 
public comment period on the Notice of Intent of Partial Deletion.
    (4) EPA has made all relevant documents available for public review 
at the information repository and in the Regional Office.
    Partial deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, 
alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations. The NPL is 
designed primarily for information purposes and to assist EPA 
management. As mentioned earlier, Sec. 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states 
that deletion of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility of 
the site for future Fund-financed response actions.
    For the deletion of these Source Areas from the Site, EPA will 
accept and evaluate public comments on this Notice of Intent of Partial 
Deletion before finalizing the decision. The Agency will prepare a 
Responsiveness Summary to address any significant public comments 
received during the comment period. The deletion is finalized after the 
Regional Administrator places a Notice of Deletion in the Federal 
Register.
    The NPL will reflect any deletions in the next publication of the 
final rule. Public notices and copies of the Responsiveness Summary 
will be made available to local residents by Region IV.

IV. Basis for Intended Source Area Deletions

    The following Site summary provides the Agency's rationale for the 
proposed intent for partial deletion of specific source areas of this 
Site from the NPL.
    The Bypass 601 Site is defined as an area located on the western 
edge of Concord, North Carolina in which groundwater is contaminated by 
multiple sources. The Martin Scrap Recycling (MSR) facility, which 
operated as a battery salvage and recycling facility from approximately 
1966 to 1986, is one of the major sources of contamination. Ten other 
source areas of contamination related to battery disposal were 
identified in the area. They are:
     Source Area 1 is located adjacent to Unnamed Stream #1, 
west of Bypass 601. This area is located in a heavily wooded steep 
terrain behind an auto sales dealership (proposed for deletion). All 
soil and debris containing contaminants above the soil cleanup levels 
(SCLs) has been removed from this Source Area. Groundwater is not 
contaminated.
     Source Area 2 is located south of Montford Avenue and west 
of Bypass 601. A mobile trailer is currently on this property (proposed 
for deletion). All soil and debris containing contaminants above the 
SCLs has been removed from this Source Area. Groundwater is not 
contaminated.
     Source Area 3 is located at 72 Sumner Avenue. A mobile 
trailer is currently on the property (proposed for deletion). All soil 
and debris containing contaminants above the SCLs has been removed from 
this Source Area. Groundwater is not contaminated.
     Source Area 4 consists of the commercial property occupied 
by an abandoned flea market and is located north and adjacent to the 
MSR facility (not proposed for deletion). Contaminants at this Source 
Area are being addressed through an ongoing remedial action.
     Source Area 5 is located at a private landfill along the 
eastern boundary of the MSR facility (not proposed for deletion). 
Contaminants at this Source Area are being addressed through an ongoing 
remedial action.
     Source Area 6 is located behind a tire store on the corner 
of McGill and Bypass 601 (not proposed for deletion). Contaminants at 
this Source Area will be addressed through institutional controls.
     Source Area 7 is the radio tower site located 
approximately \1/4\-mile north of the MSR facility (proposed for 
deletion). No soil or debris containing contaminants above the SCLs 
were found at this Source Area. Groundwater is not contaminated.
     Source Area 8 consists of the floodplain area south of 
Unnamed Stream #1 (proposed for deletion). All soil and debris 
containing contaminants above the SCLs has been removed from this 
Source Area. Groundwater is not contaminated.
     Source Area 9 is located south of Montford Avenue and lies 
southeast of Source Area 2 (proposed for deletion). All soil and debris 
containing contaminants above the SCLs has been removed from this 
Source Area. Groundwater is not contaminated.
     Source Area 10, located adjacent to Unnamed Stream #2, is 
bordered to the north, west, and south by Barnhardt Avenue, Groff 
Street, and Montford Avenue, respectively (proposed for deletion). All 
soil and debris containing contaminants above the SCLs has been removed 
from this Source Area. Groundwater is not contaminated.
    The MSR facility dealt in the recovery of scrap metal, most notably 
lead, which was recovered from scrap vehicle batteries. The batteries 
were ``cracked'' by sawing off the tops with an electric saw. Lead 
plates were then removed from the batteries for reclamation. The waste 
from this operation consisted of the sulfuric acid (contaminated with 
lead) from the batteries, and battery casings. Lead and other heavy 
metals were found in the soil; lead and three volatile organic 
compounds (VOCs) (1,2-dichloroethene, carbon tetrachloride, and 
benzene) were found in the groundwater at some of the Source Areas. The 
facility reportedly operated from 1966 to 1986. The ten other source 
areas were discovered during the Remedial Investigation. Source Areas 2 
and 6 were also reported to have been used for reclamation operations 
by Mr. Martin prior to the MSR's present location.
    The Bypass 601 Site was added to the National Priorities List (NPL) 
in June 1986.
    A Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) completed in 
1990, identified metal contamination of soils throughout the MSR 
facility (Operable Unit #1). A second RI/FS was completed in 1993 on 
the ten source areas and the groundwater (Operable Unit #2). During the 
second RI/FS, a removal was conducted by EPA on four of the Source 
Areas (1, 2, 9, and 10) that presented an immediate risk to human 
health. Approximately 14,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil and 
debris were excavated from these source areas and then stockpiled at 
the MSR facility. This material was subsequently covered with a 20-mil 
liner.
    In the April 1993 Record of Decision (ROD), contaminated soil and 
debris found in Source Areas 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 were slated for removal. 
These source areas are located in residential areas and the residents 
expressed a desire for the cleanup to occur as soon as possible. 
Therefore, in September 1996, during the Remedial Design phase, the 
Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) initiated the removal of soil 
from these outlying areas. An estimated 16, 750 cubic yards of 
contaminated soil and debris were removed. Post-excavation sampling 
confirmed that all contaminants remaining in the Source

[[Page 43900]]

Area soils were below the SCLs identified in the ROD. The soils were 
transported to the MSR facility and stockpiled. The MSR facility, and 
Source Areas 4 and 5 are currently being capped with a multi-layer cap.
    Currently, all stockpiled materials (from both removals) have been 
solidified/stabilized as part of the ongoing remedial action. In 
addition, as a result of the ongoing remedial action, monitoring wells 
were removed from the outlying source areas in June 1998.
    There are no institutional controls for Source Areas 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 
9, and 10. A five-year review will not be conducted at these Source 
Areas due to the fact that soil and groundwater contaminants are below 
the SCLs. The concentrations found in the samples taken do not present 
a current or future threat to public health or the environment.
    EPA, with concurrence of the State of North Carolina, has 
determined that all appropriate responses under CERCLA for Source Areas 
1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10 have been completed, and that no further 
activities by responsible parties are deemed necessary. Therefore, EPA 
proposes to delete these Source Areas from the NPL.

    Dated: August 5, 1998.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Deputy Regional Adminstrator, Region IV.
[FR Doc. 98-22059 Filed 8-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P