[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29443-29459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14196]
[[Page 29443]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration
[Application No. D-10503, et al.]
Proposed Exemptions; Sanwa Bank California
AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Exemptions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains notices of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of proposed exemptions from
certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) and/or the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
Written Comments and Hearing Requests
All interested persons are invited to submit written comments or
request for a hearing on the pending exemptions, unless otherwise
stated in the Notice of Proposed Exemption, within 45 days from the
date of publication of this Federal Register Notice. Comments and
requests for a hearing should state: (1) the name, address, and
telephone number of the person making the comment or request, and (2)
the nature of the person's interest in the exemption and the manner in
which the person would be adversely affected by the exemption. A
request for a hearing must also state the issues to be addressed and
include a general description of the evidence to be presented at the
hearing.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and request for a hearing (at least
three copies) should be sent to the Pension and Welfare Benefits
Administration, Office of Exemption Determinations, Room N-5649, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20210. Attention: Application No. , stated in each Notice of Proposed
Exemption. The applications for exemption and the comments received
will be available for public inspection in the Public Documents Room of
Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of Labor,
Room N-5507, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions will be provided to all
interested persons in the manner agreed upon by the applicant and the
Department within 15 days of the date of publication in the Federal
Register. Such notice shall include a copy of the notice of proposed
exemption as published in the Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed exemptions were requested in
applications filed pursuant to section 408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4
of 1978 (43 FR 47713, October 17, 1978) transferred the authority of
the Secretary of the Treasury to issue exemptions of the type requested
to the Secretary of Labor. Therefore, these notices of proposed
exemption are issued solely by the Department.
The applications contain representations with regard to the
proposed exemptions which are summarized below. Interested persons are
referred to the applications on file with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and representations.
Sanwa Bank California (Sanwa Bank) Located in Los Angeles, CA
[Application No. D-10503]
Proposed Exemption
Section I. Proposed Exemption for the In-Kind Transfers of Assets
If the exemption is granted, the restrictions of section 406(a) and
section 406(b) of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (F) shall not apply, effective October 31, 1997,
to the purchase, by an employee benefit plan established and maintained
by parties other than Sanwa Bank (the Client Plan) or by Sanwa Bank
(the Bank Plan) 1 of shares of one or more open-end
management investment companies (the Fund or Funds), registered under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), in
exchange for assets of the Plan transferred in-kind to the Fund by a
collective investment fund (the CIF) maintained by Sanwa Bank, where
Sanwa Bank is the investment adviser and may provide other services to
the Fund (the Secondary Services), as defined in Section III(i), and
where Sanwa Bank is also a fiduciary of the Plan, in connection with
the termination of such CIFs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Unless otherwise noted, the Client Plans and the Bank Plans
are collectively referred to as the Plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposed exemption is subject to the following conditions:
(a) A fiduciary (the Second Fiduciary), as defined in Section
III(h), which is acting on behalf of each affected Plan and which is
independent of and unrelated to Sanwa Bank, receives advance written
notice of the in-kind transfer of assets of the CIFs in exchange for
shares of the Funds and full written disclosures of information
concerning the Funds which includes the following:
(1) A current prospectus for each Fund in which the Client Plan may
invest;
(2) A statement describing the fees for investment advisory or
other similar services, any fees for Secondary Services, as defined in
Section III(i), and all other fees to be charged to or paid by the
Client Plan and by such Funds to Sanwa Bank, including the nature and
extent of any differential between the rates of such fees;
(3) A statement of the reasons why Sanwa Bank may consider such
investment to be appropriate for the Client Plan;
(4) A statement of whether there are any limitations applicable to
Sanwa Bank with respect to which assets of a Client Plan may be
invested in Fund shares, and, if so, the nature of such limitations;
and
(5) A copy of the proposed exemption and/or a copy of the final
exemption upon the request of the Second Fiduciary.
(b) On the basis of the foregoing information, the Second Fiduciary
gives prior approval in writing for each purchase of Fund shares in
exchange for the Plan's assets transferred from the CIF, consistent
with the responsibilities, obligations and duties imposed on
fiduciaries by Part 4 of Title I of the Act. In addition, the Second
Fiduciary gives prior approval in writing of the receipt of
confirmation statements described in Section I(g) by facsimile or
electronic mail if the Second Fiduciary elects to receive such
statements in that form.
(c) No sales commissions or other fees are paid by the Plan in
connection with the purchase of Fund shares.
(d) All transferred assets are securities for which market
quotations are readily available, or cash.
(e) The transferred assets constitute a pro rata portion of all
assets of a Plan held in the CIF immediately prior to the transfer.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the allocation of fixed-income
securities held by a CIF among Plans on the basis of each Plan's pro
rata share of the aggregate value of such securities will not fail to
meet the requirements of this subsection if:
[[Page 29444]]
(1) The aggregate value of such securities does not exceed one (1)
percent of the total value of the assets held by the CIF immediately
prior to the transfer, in connection with the termination of such CIF;
and
(2) Such securities have the same coupon rate and maturity, and at
the time of the transfer, the same credit ratings from nationally
recognized statistical rating agencies.
(f) Each Plan receives Fund shares that have a total net asset
value equal to the value of the Plan's transferred assets on the date
of the transfer, as determined with respect to securities in a single
valuation performed in the same manner and at the close of business on
the same day in accordance with Rule 17a-7 (using sources independent
of Sanwa Bank and the Fund) and the procedures established by the Funds
pursuant to Rule 17a-7. Such procedures must require that all
securities for which a current market price cannot be obtained by
reference to the last sale price for transactions reported on a
recognized securities exchange or NASDAQ be valued based on an average
of the highest current independent bid and lowest current independent
offer, as of the close of business on the last business day prior to
the in-kind transfers, determined on the basis of reasonable inquiry
from at least three sources that are broker-dealers or pricing services
independent of Sanwa Bank.
(g) Sanwa Bank sends by regular mail or, if applicable, by
facsimile or electronic mail, to the Second Fiduciary of each affected
Plan that purchases Fund shares in connection with the in-kind
transfer, the following information:
(1) No later than 30 days after the completion of the purchase, a
written confirmation which contains--
(A) The identity of each transferred security that was valued for
purposes of the transaction in accordance with Rule 17a-7(b)(4);
(B) The current market price, as of the date of the in-kind
transfer, of each such security involved in the transaction; and
(C) The identity of each pricing service or market-maker consulted
in determining the current market price of such securities.
(2) No later than 105 days after the completion of each purchase, a
written confirmation which contains --
(A) The number of CIF units held by each affected Plan immediately
before the in-kind transfer, the related per unit value, and the total
dollar amount of such CIF units; and
(C) The number of shares in the Funds that are held by each
affected Plan immediately following the in-kind transfer, the related
per share net asset value and the total dollar amount of such shares.
(h) The conditions set forth in Sections II(d), (e), (n)(1), (o),
(p) and (q) are satisfied.
Section II. Proposed Exemption for the Receipt of fees From the
Funds
If the exemption is granted, the restrictions of section 406(a) and
section 406(b) of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (F) of the Code shall not apply, effective
October 31, 1997, to (1) the receipt of fees by Sanwa Bank from the
Funds for investment advisory services provided to the Funds; and (2)
the receipt or retention of fees by Sanwa Bank from the Funds for
acting as a custodian or shareholder serving agent to the Funds, as
well as for providing any other services to the Funds which are not
investment advisory services (i.e., the Secondary Services), as defined
in Section III(i), in connection with the investment of shares in the
Funds by the Client Plans for which Sanwa Bank acts as a
fiduciary,2 provided that the following conditions are met:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Sanwa Bank is not requesting an exemption for investments in
the Funds by the Bank Plans. Sanwa Bank represents that the Bank
Plans may acquire or sell shares of the Funds pursuant to Prohibited
Transaction Exemption (PTE) 77-3 (42 FR 18734, April 8, 1977). PTE
77-3 permits the acquisition or sale of shares of a registered,
open-end investment company by an employee benefit plan covering
only employees of such investment company, employees of the
investment adviser or principal underwriter for such investment
company, or employees of any affiliated person (as defined therein)
of such investment adviser or principal underwriter, provided
certain conditions are met. The Department expresses no opinion on
whether any transactions with the Funds by the Bank Plans would be
covered by PTE 77-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) No sales commissions are paid by the Client Plans in connection
with purchases or redemptions of shares of the Funds and no redemption
fees are paid in connection with the sale of such shares by the Client
Plans to the Funds.
(b) The price paid or received by the Client Plans for shares in
the Funds is the net asset value per share, as defined in Section
III(e), at the time of the transaction and is the same price which
would have been paid or received for the shares by any other investor
at that time.
(c) Sanwa Bank, any of its affiliates or their officers or
directors do not purchase from or sell to any of the Client Plans
shares of any of the Funds.
(d) For each Client Plan, the combined total of all fees received
by Sanwa Bank for the provision of services to such Plan, and in
connection with the provision of services to any of the Funds in which
the Client Plans may invest, is not in excess of ``reasonable
compensation'' within the meaning of section 408(b)(2) of the Act.
(e) Sanwa Bank does not receive any fees payable, pursuant to Rule
12b-1 (the 12b-1 Fees) under the 1940 Act in connection with the
transactions involving the Funds.
(f) A Second Fiduciary with respect to a Client Plan receives in
advance of the investment by the Client Plan in any of the Funds, a
full and detailed written disclosure of information concerning such
Fund including, but not limited to the disclosures described above in
Section I(a).
(g) On the basis of the foregoing information, the Second Fiduciary
authorizes in writing--
(1) The investment of assets of the Client Plan in shares of the
Fund;
(2) The Funds in which the assets of the Client Plan may be
invested; and
(3) The fees received by Sanwa Bank in connection with investment
advisory services and Secondary Services provided to the Funds, such
authorization by the Second Fiduciary to be consistent with the
responsibilities obligations, and duties imposed on fiduciaries by Part
4 of Title I of the Act.
(h) The authorization, described in Section II(g) is terminable at
will by the Second Fiduciary of a Client Plan, without penalty to such
Client Plan. Such termination will be effected by Sanwa Bank redeeming
the shares of the Funds held by the affected Client Plan within one
business day following receipt by Sanwa Bank, either by mail, hand
delivery, facsimile, or other available means at the option of the
Second Fiduciary, of written notice of termination (the Termination
Form), as defined in Section III(j); provided that if, due to
circumstances beyond the control of Sanwa Bank, the redemption cannot
be executed within one business day, Sanwa Bank shall have one
additional business day to complete such redemption.
(i) The Client Plans do not pay any Plan-level investment advisory
fees to Sanwa Bank with respect to any of the assets of such Client
Plans which are invested in shares of the Funds. This condition does
not preclude the payment of investment advisory fees by the Funds to
Sanwa Bank under the terms of an investment advisory agreement adopted
in accordance with section 15 of the 1940 Act or other agreement
between Sanwa Bank and the Funds or the retention by Sanwa Bank of fees
for Secondary Services paid to Sanwa Bank by the Funds.
[[Page 29445]]
(j) In the event of an increase in the rate of any fees paid by the
Funds to Sanwa Bank regarding investment advisory services that Sanwa
Bank provides to the Funds over an existing rate for such services that
had been authorized by a Second Fiduciary of a Client Plan, in
accordance with Section II(g), Sanwa Bank will, at least 30 days in
advance of the implementation of such increase, provide a written
notice (which may take the form of a proxy statement, letter, or
similar communication that is separate from the prospectus of the Fund
and which explains the nature and amount of the increase in fees) to
the Second Fiduciary of each Client Plan invested in a Fund which is
increasing such fees. Such notice shall be accompanied by the
Termination Form, as defined in Section III(j).
(k) In the event of an (1) addition of a Secondary Service, as
defined in Section III(i), provided by Sanwa Bank to the Funds for
which a fee is charged or (2) an increase in the rate of any fee paid
by the Funds to Sanwa Bank for any Secondary Service that results
either from an increase in the rate of such fee or from the decrease in
the number or kind of services performed by Sanwa Bank for such fee
over an existing rate for such Secondary Service which had been
authorized by the Secondary Fiduciary in accordance with Section II(g),
Sanwa Bank will, at least 30 days in advance of the implementation of
such Secondary Service or fee increase, provide a written notice (which
may take the form of a proxy statement, letter, or similar
communication that is separate from the prospectus of the Funds and
which explains the nature and amount of the additional Secondary
Service for which a fee is charged or the nature and amount of the
increase in fees) to the Second Fiduciary of each of the Client Plans
invested in a Fund which is adding a service or increasing fees. Such
notice shall be accompanied by the Termination Form, as defined in
Section III(j).
(l) The Second Fiduciary is supplied with a Termination Form at the
times specified in Sections II(j),(k) and (m), which expressly provides
an election to terminate the authorization, described above Section
II(g), with instructions regarding the use of such Termination Form
including statements that--
(1) The authorization is terminable at will by any of the Client
Plans, without penalty to such Plans. The termination will be effected
by Sanwa Bank redeeming shares of the Funds held by the Client Plans
requesting termination within the period of time specified by the
Client Plan, but not later than one business day following receipt by
Sanwa Bank from the Second Fiduciary of the Termination Form or any
written notice of termination; provided that if, due to circumstances
beyond the control of Sanwa Bank, the redemption of shares of such
Client Plan cannot be executed within one business day, Sanwa Bank
shall have one additional business day to complete such redemption; and
(2) Failure by the Second Fiduciary to return the Termination Form
on behalf of the Client Plan will be deemed to be an approval of the
additional Secondary Service for which a fee is charged or an increase
in the rate of any fees and will result in the continuation of the
authorization, as described in Section II(g), of Sanwa Bank to engage
in the transactions on behalf of the Client Plan;
(m) The Second Fiduciary is supplied with a Termination Form at
least once in each calendar year, beginning with the calendar year that
begins after the grant of this proposed exemption is published in the
Federal Register and continuing for each calendar year thereafter,
provided that the Termination Form need not be supplied to the Second
Fiduciary, pursuant to this paragraph, sooner than six months after
such Termination Form is supplied pursuant to Sections II(j) and (k),
except to the extent required by Sections II(j) and (k) to disclose an
additional Secondary Service for which a fee is charged or an increase
in fees.
(n)(1) With respect to each of the Funds in which a Client Plan
invests, Sanwa Bank will provide the Second Fiduciary of such Plan the
following information:
(A) At least annually, a copy of an updated prospectus of such
Fund; and
(B) Upon the request of the Second Fiduciary, a report or statement
(which may take the form of the most recent financial report, the
current statement of additional information, or some other written
statement) which contains a description of all fees paid by the Fund to
Sanwa Bank.
(2) With respect to each of the Funds in which a Client Plan
invests, in the event such Fund places brokerage transactions with
Sanwa Bank, Sanwa Bank will provide the Second Fiduciary of such Client
Plan at least annually with a statement specifying--
(A) The total, expressed in dollars, brokerage commissions of each
Fund that are paid to Sanwa Bank by such Fund;
(B) The total, expressed in dollars, brokerage commissions of each
Fund that are paid by such Fund to brokerage firms unrelated to Sanwa
Bank;
(C) The average brokerage commissions per share, expressed as cents
per share, paid to Sanwa Bank by each Fund; and
(D) The average brokerage commissions per share, expressed as cents
per share, paid by each Fund to brokerage firms unrelated to Sanwa
Bank.
(o) All dealings between the Client Plans and any of the Funds are
on a basis no less favorable to such Client Plans than dealings between
the Funds and other non-Plan shareholders holding the same class of
shares as the Client Plans.
(p) Sanwa Bank maintains for a period of 6 years, in a manner that
is accessible for audit and examination, the records necessary to
enable the persons, described in Section II(q), to determine whether
the conditions of this exemption have been met, except that--
(1) A prohibited transaction will not be considered to have
occurred if, due to circumstances beyond the control of Sanwa Bank, the
records are lost or destroyed prior to the end of the 6 year period;
and
(2) No party in interest, other than Sanwa Bank, shall be subject
to the civil penalty that may be assessed under section 502(i) of the
Act, or to the taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, if
the records are not maintained, or are not available for examination as
required by Section II(q).
(q)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (q)(2) of this Section II
and notwithstanding any provisions of subsection (a)(2) and (b) of
section 504 of the Act, the records referred to in Section II(p) are
unconditionally available at their customary location for examination
during normal business hours by--
(A) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department, the Internal Revenue Service (the Service) or the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC);
(B) Any fiduciary of each of the Client Plans who has authority to
acquire or dispose of shares of any of the Funds owned by such Client
Plan, or any duly authorized employee or representative of such
fiduciary; and
(C) Any participant or beneficiary of the Plans or duly authorized
employee or representative of such participant or beneficiary.
(2) None of the persons described in paragraph (q)(1)(B) and
(q)(1)(C) of Section II shall be authorized to examine trade secrets of
Sanwa Bank, or commercial or financial information which is privileged
or confidential.
[[Page 29446]]
Section III. Definitions
For purposes of this proposed exemption,
(a) The term ``Sanwa Bank'' means Sanwa Bank California and any
affiliate of Sanwa Bank, as defined in Section III(b).
(b) An ``affiliate'' of a person includes:
(1) Any person directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common control
with the person;
(2) Any officer, director, employee, relative, or partner in any
such person; and
(3) Any corporation or partnership of which such person is an
officer, director, partner, or employee.
(c) The term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or policies of a person other than an
individual;
(d) The terms ``Fund or Funds'' mean any open-end management
investment company or companies registered under the 1940 Act for which
Sanwa Bank serves as investment adviser and may also provide custodial
or other services, such as Secondary Services, as approved by such
Funds.
(e) The term ``net asset value'' means the amount for purposes of
pricing all purchases and redemptions calculated by dividing the value
of all securities, determined by a method as set forth in a Fund's
prospectus and statement of additional information, and other assets
belonging to each of the portfolios in such Fund, less the liabilities
charged to each portfolio, by the number of outstanding shares.
(f) The term ``Plan'' means a welfare plan described in 29 CFR
2510.3-1, as amended; a pension plan described in 29 CFR 2510.3-2, as
amended; a plan described in section 4975(e)(1) of the Code; and a
retirement plan qualified under section 401(a) of the Code with respect
to which Sanwa Bank serves or will serve as trustee, investment manager
or custodian, and which constitutes an ``employee benefit plan'' under
section 3(3) of the Act. The term ``Client Plan'' includes a Plan
maintained by an entity other than Sanwa Bank. The term ``Bank Plan''
includes a Plan maintained by Sanwa Bank, including, but not limited
to, the Sanwa Bank California Retirement Plan (the SBC Retirement Plan)
and the Sanwa Bank California Premiere Savings Plan (the SBC Savings
Plan).
(g) The term ``relative'' means a ``relative'' as that term is
defined in section 3(15) of the Act (or a ``member of the family'' as
that term is defined in section 4975(e)(6) of the Code), or a brother,
a sister, or a spouse of a brother or a sister.
(h) The term ``Second Fiduciary'' means a fiduciary of a plan who
is independent of and unrelated to Sanwa Bank. For purposes of this
exemption, the Second Fiduciary will not be deemed to be independent of
and unrelated to Sanwa Bank if--
(1) Such Second Fiduciary directly or indirectly controls, is
controlled by or is under common control with Sanwa Bank;
(2) Such Second Fiduciary, or any officer, director, partner,
employee or relative of such Second Fiduciary is an officer, director,
partner or employee of Sanwa Bank (or is a relative of such persons);
and
(3) Such Second Fiduciary directly or indirectly receives any
compensation or other consideration in connection with any transaction
described in this exemption; provided, however, that, with respect to
the Bank Plans, the Second Fiduciary may receive compensation from
Sanwa Bank in connection with the transactions contemplated herein, but
the amount or payment of such compensation may not be contingent upon
or in any way affected by the Second Fiduciary's ultimate decision
regarding whether the Bank Plans participate in the transactions and
may not exceed 5 percent of such Second Fiduciary's gross annual
revenues.
With respect to the Client Plans, if an officer, director, partner,
or employee of Sanwa Bank (or a relative of such persons), is a
director of such Second Fiduciary, and if he or she abstains from
participation in the choice of the Plan's investment manager/adviser,
the approval of any purchase or redemption by the Plan of shares of the
Funds, and the approval of any increase of fees, in connection with any
of the transactions described in Sections I and II, then Section
III(h)(2) shall not apply.
(i) The term ``Secondary Service'' means a service, other than an
investment advisory or similar service, which is provided by Sanwa Bank
to the Funds, including but not limited to, accounting, administrative,
brokerage or custodial services.
(j) The term ``Termination Form'' means the form supplied to the
Second Fiduciary of a Client Plan, at the times specified in Section
II(j), (k), and (m), which expressly provides an election to the Second
Fiduciary to terminate on behalf of the Plans the authorization,
described in Section II(g). Such Termination Form may be used at will
by the Second Fiduciary to terminate such authorization without penalty
to the Client Plan and to notify Sanwa Bank in writing to effect such
termination by redeeming shares of the Fund held by the Plans
requesting termination not later than one business day following
receipt by Sanwa Bank of written notice, either by mail, hand delivery,
facsimile or other available means at the option of the Second
Fiduciary, of such request for termination; provided that if, due to
circumstances beyond the control of Sanwa Bank, the redemption cannot
be executed within one business day, Sanwa Bank shall have one
additional business day to complete such redemption.
(k) The term ``fixed-income security'' means any interest-bearing
or discounted government or corporate security with a face amount of
$1,000 or more that obligates the issuer to pay the holder a specified
sum of money, at specific intervals, and to repay the principal amount
of the loan at maturity.
(l) The term ``security'' shall have the same meaning as defined in
section 2(36) of the 1940 Act, as amended, 15 USC 80a-2(36) (1996).
(m) The term ``business day'' means a banking day as defined by
federal or state banking regulations.
EFFECTIVE DATE: If granted, this proposed exemption will be effective
as of October 31, 1997.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. Description of the Parties
The parties involved in the subject transactions are described as
follows:
(a) Sanwa Bank, a California-chartered bank, is a wholly owned
subsidiary of The Sanwa Bank, Limited, which is headquartered in Japan.
Sanwa Bank provides trust and banking services to individuals,
corporations and institutions, both nationally and internationally.
Sanwa Bank serves as trustee, investment manager or custodian to the
Plans described herein and will serve as investment adviser to the
Funds described more fully below. As of December 31, 1997, Sanwa Bank
held total trust and fiduciary assets of approximately $10.2 billion.
(b) The Plans include welfare plans described in 29 CFR 2510.3-1,
as amended; pension plans described in 29 CFR 2510.3-2, as amended;
plans described in section 4975(e)(1) of the Code; and retirement plans
qualified under section 401(a) of the Code with respect to which Sanwa
Bank serves or will serve as trustee, investment manager or custodian,
and which constitute ``employee benefit plans'' under section 3(3) of
the Act. As of December 31, 1997, Sanwa Bank served
[[Page 29447]]
as trustee, investment manager or custodian for approximately 856
Client Plans with total assets of approximately $1.7 billion. In
addition, Sanwa Bank had investment responsibility with respect to
approximately $95 million in Client Plan assets, of which approximately
$25 million represented assets invested in converting CIFs. Whether any
Client Plan will participate in a conversion transaction will depend
solely on the decision of a fiduciary which is independent of Sanwa
Bank (i.e., a Second Fiduciary).3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Department is not proposing exemptive relief herein for
transactions afforded relief by section 404(c) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Plans also include certain Bank Plans that are maintained by
Sanwa Bank. Specifically, the Bank Plans presently include the SBC
Retirement Plan and SBC Savings Plan. As of December 31, 1997, the SBC
Retirement Plan and the SBC Savings Plan had total assets of
approximately $175 million and $68 million, respectively. As of August
28, 1997, the SBC Retirement Plan had 4,500 participants and the SBC
Savings Plan had 3,500 participants. Whether a Bank Plan may
participate in a conversion transaction will also be determined by a
Second Fiduciary which has been appointed to represent the interests of
the Bank Plans.
(c) The CIFs are separate investment funds maintained under a trust
known as ``The Sanwa Bank California Common Trust Fund.'' The CIFs that
were converted in the initial conversion transaction were the
following: 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Sanwa Bank maintains CIFs other than those involved in the
subject transactions. Some of these CIFs, which were converted
contemporaneously with the CIFs, do not hold Plan assets while
others do. As such, it is proposed that those CIFs holding plan
assets be covered by the requested exemption if and when they are
converted in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITS Asset Allocation Investment Fund, also known as
Balanced Fund J (the Asset Allocation Fund)
ITS Common Stock Investment Fund, also known as Equity
Fund D (the Equity Fund)
ITS Bond Investment Fund, also known as Fixed Income Fund
C (the Fixed Income Fund)
ITS International Common Stock Fund, also known as
International Equity Fund G (the International Equity Fund)
ITS Money Market Investment Fund, also known as Money
Market Fund E (the Money Market Fund)
The general investment policy and objective of these CIFs
correspond substantially to the Funds described below.
(d) The Funds, otherwise referred to as ``The Eureka Funds,''
constitute an open-end management investment company registered under
the 1940 Act, as amended. The Funds are and will be separate investment
portfolios or ``series'' of The Eureka Funds that will be offered to
investors at ``no-load.'' Therefore, Sanwa Bank requests that the
exemption apply both retroactively to the existing Funds and
prospectively to any similar Fund with respect to which Sanwa Bank or
its affiliates may provide services.
The Eureka Funds initially will consist of five Funds, each to be
offered and sold in compliance with SEC rules and regulations. These
five Funds are listed as follows:
The Eureka Global Asset Allocation Fund
The Eureka Equity Fund
The Eureka Investment Grade Bond Fund
The Eureka Prime Money Market Fund
The Eureka U.S. Treasury Obligations Fund 5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The U.S. Treasury Obligations Fund was not involved in the
conversion transaction described in this proposed exemption.
However, this Fund would be covered by the requested exemption to
the extent that a converting CIF were to transfer its assets to such
Fund or a Plan or Plans were to invest in this Fund in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sanwa Bank serves as investment adviser to the Funds. For such
services performed, Sanwa Bank will receive annualized investment
advisory fees currently ranging from 0.10 percent for the U.S. Treasury
Obligations Fund to 0.80 percent for the Global Asset Allocation Fund.
Although parties unrelated to Sanwa Bank will typically provide
custody, transfer agent, recordkeeping and other services (i.e.,
Secondary Services) to the Funds, it is possible that Sanwa Bank or an
affiliate may undertake to provide such services to a Fund in the
future.
(f) Actuarial Sciences Associates, Inc. (ASA) has been retained
temporarily by Sanwa Bank to serve as the Second Fiduciary for Bank
Plans investing in the Funds. ASA, which is located in Somerset, New
Jersey, is an affiliate of AT&T Investment Management Corporation
(ATTIMCO). ATTIMCO is a wholly owned subsidiary of AT&T and is a
registered investment adviser under the 1940 Act. As of November 1997,
ATTIMCO exercised discretionary authority with respect to over
approximately $40 billion in assets. ASA, ATTIMCO and their affiliates
are independent of and unrelated to Sanwa Bank and its affiliates. The
fees received by ASA from Sanwa Bank currently represent less than one-
tenth of one percent of the gross revenues of ASA and are not likely to
exceed 5 percent of ASA's gross revenues in the foreseeable future.
Description of the Transactions
2. Sanwa Bank requests exemptive relief with respect to the in-kind
transfer, of all or a pro rata portion of a Plan's assets that were
invested in the terminating CIFs (identified above) to the Funds, in
exchange for shares of the Funds. In addition, Sanwa Bank requests
exemptive relief for the receipt of fees from the Funds, in connection
with the investment of assets of Client Plans for which Sanwa Bank acts
as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian, in shares of the Funds
in instances where Sanwa Bank is an investment adviser, custodian, and
shareholder servicing agent for the Funds.6 The exemptive
relief provided for the receipt of fees would cover Client Plans of
Sanwa Bank only. If granted, the exemption would be effective as of
October 31, 1997 and would apply to similar transactions that may arise
in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ As previously noted, Sanwa Bank is not requesting an
exemption for investments in the Funds by the Bank Plans. Sanwa Bank
represents that the Bank Plans may acquire or sell shares of the
Funds pursuant to PTE 77-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In-Kind Transfers by the Plans
3. Sanwa Bank decided to terminate the aforementioned CIFs and
offer to the Plans participating therein the opportunity to acquire
shares in their corresponding Funds as alternative investments. Because
the interests in CIFs generally must be liquidated or withdrawn to
effect distributions, Sanwa Bank believes that the interests of the
Plans participating in the CIFs (and similar CIFs that may convert in
the future) would be better served by investment in shares of the
Funds, which can be distributed in-kind.
In addition, Sanwa Bank believes that the Funds may offer
advantages over the CIFs such as pooled investment vehicles in that
Plans, as shareholders of a Fund, will have the opportunity to exercise
voting and other shareholder rights. Plans, as shareholders of the
Funds, also will receive periodic disclosures concerning the Funds, as
mandated by the SEC, including a prospectus, which is updated at least
annually, an annual report containing audited financial statements of
the Funds and information regarding such Funds' performance (unless
such performance information is included in the prospectus of such
Funds), and a semiannual report containing unaudited financial
statements. Further, the Plans will be able to monitor the net asset
value of the
[[Page 29448]]
Funds daily from information available in newspapers of general
circulation.
Sanwa Bank believes that if the assets of a terminating CIF are
transferred in-kind to a corresponding Fund in exchange for shares of
such Fund, potentially large brokerage expenses can be avoided. These
consist mainly of expenses that otherwise would be incurred if the CIF
assets were liquidated and the proceeds used to purchase Fund shares
that are substantially identical to the CIFs. No brokerage commissions
or other fees (other than customary transfer charges paid to parties
other than Sanwa Bank or its affiliates) have been charged or will be
charged to the Plans or the CIFs with respect to the conversions or in
connection with any other acquisition or redemption of Fund shares by
the Plans. In addition, no Fund has paid or will pay any 12b-1 Fees to
Sanwa Bank or its affiliates.
It is represented that the in-kind transfers of CIF assets in
exchange for shares of the Funds are ministerial transactions performed
in accordance with pre-established objective procedures approved by the
Funds' board of trustees. Such procedures require that assets
transferred to a corresponding Fund (a) be consistent with the
investment objectives, policies and restrictions of the Fund, (b)
satisfy the applicable requirements of the 1940 Act and the Code and,
(c) have a readily ascertainable market value.
4. Except as indicated below with respect to the International
Equity CIF, on October 31, 1997, Sanwa Bank transferred Plan assets
held in the affected CIFs to the corresponding Funds as shown in the
table.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CIF portfolio Corresponding fund portfolio
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asset Allocation Fund..................... Global Asset Allocation
Fund.
Equity Fund............................... Equity Fund.
Fixed Income Fund......................... Investment Grade Bond Fund.
International Equity Fund................. Global Asset Allocation
Fund.
Money Market Fund......................... Prime Money Market Fund.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
With regard to the International Equity CIF, the participants, of
which include the SBC Retirement Plan, the SBC Savings Plan and a
number of Client Plans, the conversion of the CIF was processed as
follows:
(a) The SBC Savings Plan's interest in the International Equity CIF
was liquidated and reinvested in shares of a mutual fund investing
primarily in foreign securities sponsored and advised by a third party
unrelated to Sanwa Bank, which replaced the CIF as an investment option
under the SBC Savings Plan. SBC Savings Plan participants who did not
wish to invest in a new mutual fund were given the option of electing
instead to have their interest in the International Equity CIF
reinvested in another option under the Plan.7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In response to the Department's inquiry as to why the SBC
Savings Plan's interest in the CIF was liquidated and reinvested in
a third party fund or in another investment option offered under the
Plan, ASA states that none of the Funds offered to the SBC Savings
Plan had the same investment policies and objectives that had been
offered to participants of such Plan. In this regard, it was
determined that in light of the termination of the International
Equity CIF, it would be in the interest of participants in the SBC
Savings Plan to have monies previously invested in such CIF
transferred to a third-party, international equity fund managed by
Vanguard, which had objectives similar to the International Equity
CIF, rather than to the Global Asset Allocation Fund. According to
ASA, the Global Asset Allocation Fund is not solely an international
equity fund. Instead, it is a balanced fund with a portion of its
assets invested in United States investments. ASA states that the
fiduciary of the SBC Savings Plan thought it more appropriate to
invest that Plan's assets in an exclusively international equity
fund instead of in a balanced fund having some United States
investments. ASA further represents that it concurs with the
fiduciary's investment decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Subject to approval of the appropriate Second Fiduciaries, the
SBC Retirement Plan and the Client Plan participated in the conversion
of the International Equity CIF to Global Asset Allocation Fund, to the
extent of their respective interests therein.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ It is represented that Sanwa Bank was of the view that the
Global Asset Allocation Fund would be advantageous to current
participants in the International Equity CIF in that the Fund would
offer enhanced liquidity and economies of scale resulting from a
larger fund and an efficient method of diversifying among domestic
and international asset classes and reducing risks for participants
in the SBC Retirement Plan. In this regard, ASA states that the
fiduciary of the SBC Retirement Plan had rebalanced other portions
of that Plan's portfolio to reflect the United States and non-equity
investments found in the Global Asset Allocation Fund, thereby
making the conversion to the Global Asset Allocation Fund for the
SBC Retirement Plan an appropriate investment decision. ASA
represents that it concurs with this investment decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. The initial conversion was completed in a single transaction
occurring after the close of business on October 31, 1997 and prior to
the opening of business on November 3, 1997. The initial conversion was
accomplished by an in-kind transfer of all of the assets of the
converting CIF to the corresponding Fund, in exchange for an
appropriate number of shares of that Fund. The affected CIF was then
terminated and its assets, consisting of Fund shares, were distributed
in-kind to the Plans formerly participating in the CIF based on each
Plan's pro rata share of the CIF's assets on the date of the
conversion.9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Although different CIFs may be converted by Sanwa Bank in
the future on different dates, similar procedures will apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Prior to the conversion, the assets of each converting CIF were
reviewed to confirm that they were appropriate investments for the
receiving Fund. If any of the assets of a CIF were not appropriate for
its corresponding Fund, such assets were sold in the open market
through a brokerage firm unaffiliated with Sanwa Bank prior to the date
of the conversion.
7. Sanwa Bank provided to each affected Plan disclosures that
announced the termination of the CIF, summarized the transaction and
otherwise complied with the provisions of Section I of this proposed
exemption. Based on these disclosures, the Second Fiduciary for each
affected Plan approved, in writing, the conversion transaction,
including the fees that were to be paid by the Funds to Sanwa Bank and
its affiliates. A Plan electing not to participate in the conversion
transaction received a cash payment representing the Plan's pro rata
share of the assets of the converting CIF before the transaction
occurred.
8. In the case of the Bank Plans, ASA was required to make an
independent determination in its fiduciary capacity that participation
in the conversion transaction was in the best interest of the Bank
Plans, including the decision whether to participate therein. As part
of its written report setting out the conclusions discussed in
Representation 12 below, ASA was required to confirm both its
independence from Sanwa Bank and its qualifications to serve as the
Second Fiduciary for the Bank Plans. In addition, ASA represented that
it would not derive more than 5 percent of its gross annual revenues
from Sanwa Bank in connection with such in-kind transfers.
9. The assets transferred by a converting CIF to its corresponding
Fund consisted entirely of cash and securities for which market
quotations were readily available. For this purpose, the value of the
CIF's securities was determined based on the market value as of the
close of business on the business day prior to the in-kind transfer of
such securities to the corresponding Fund (the Valuation Date). The
value of the CIF assets on the Valuation Date was determined using the
valuation procedures described in SEC Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act. In
this regard, the ``current market price'' for specific types of
securities was determined as follows:
[[Page 29449]]
(a) If the security was a ``reported security'' as the term is
defined in Rule 11Aa3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(1934 Act), the last sale price with respect to such security
reported in the consolidated transaction reporting system (the
Consolidated System) for the Valuation Date; or if there were no
reported transactions in the Consolidated System that day, the
average of the highest current independent bid and the lowest
current independent offer for such security (reported pursuant to
Rule 11Ac1-1 under the 1934 Act), as of the close of business on the
Valuation Date.
(b) If the security was not a reported security, and the
principal market for such security was an exchange, then the last
sale on such exchange on the Valuation Date; or if there were no
reported transactions on such exchange that day, the average of the
highest current independent bid and lowest current independent offer
on such exchange as of the close of business on the Valuation Date.
(c) If the security was not a reported security and was quoted
in the NASDAQ system, then the average of the highest current
independent bid and lowest current independent offer reported on
NASDAQ as of the close of business on the Valuation Date.
(d) For all other securities, the average of the highest current
independent bid and lowest current independent offer as of the close
of business on the Valuation Date, determined on the basis of
reasonable inquiry. (For securities in this category, Sanwa Bank
represents that it obtained quotations from at least three sources
which were either broker-dealers or pricing services independent of
and unrelated to Sanwa Bank and, where more than one valid quotation
was available, used the average of the quotations to value the
securities, in conformance with interpretations by the SEC and
practice under Rule 17a-7.) 10
\10\ Securities of non-U.S. issuers may be traded on U.S.
exchanges or NASDAQ, directly or in the form of ADRs, or may be
traded on foreign exchanges or foreign over-the-counter markets. In
the latter case, valuation was performed in accordance with (d)
above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. The securities received by a corresponding Fund were valued by
such Fund for purposes of the in-kind transfer in the same manner and
as of the same day as such securities were valued by the CIF. The value
of the shares of each Fund issued to the CIF was based on the
corresponding Fund's then-current net asset value. Since the Funds did
not have assets in more than a nominal amount prior to the conversion,
each Fund's net asset value was expected to be equal to the value of
the assets received from the transferring CIF. Sanwa Bank represents
that the value of a Plan's investment in shares of each Fund as of the
opening of business was equal to the value of such Plan's investment in
each corresponding CIF as of the close of business on the business day
before the conversion.
11. Following the initial in-kind transfers, Sanwa Bank sent ASA,
as the Second Fiduciary for the Bank Plans, as well as the Second
Fiduciaries of the Client Plans, written confirmations of the
transactions. In this regard, no later than 30 days after the
completion of the conversion, Sanwa Bank sent by regular mail to the
Second Fiduciary written confirmation which contains (a) the identity
of each transferred security that was valued for purposes of the
conversion in accordance with Rule 17a-7(b)(4), as described above, (b)
the current market price, as of the Valuation Date, of each such
security involved in the conversion, and (c) the identity of each
pricing services or market maker consulted in determining the current
market price of such securities.11 In addition, no later
than 105 days after the completion of the conversion, Sanwa Bank sent
by regular mail a written confirmation to the Second Fiduciary of each
affected Plan showing (a) the number of CIF units held by the Plan
immediately before the conversion, (i) the related per unit value, (ii)
the total dollar amount of the units transferred; and (b) the number of
shares of the Funds that are held by such Plan following the
conversion, (i) the related per share net asset value, and (ii) the
total dollar amount of such shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The securities subject to valuation under Rule 17(a)-
7(b)(4) include all securities other than ``reported securities,''
as the term is defined in Rule 11Aa3-1 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, or those quoted on the NASDAQ system or for which the
principal market is an exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with the conditions under Section I of this proposed
exemption, similar procedures will be adopted upon any future in-kind
exchanges between CIFs maintained by Sanwa Bank and the
Funds.12
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Although not contemplated by the initial conversion
transaction, the requested exemption includes certain procedures
that are consistent with PTE 97-41 (62 FR 42830, August 8, 1997),
PTE 97-41 permits a client plan to purchase shares of a mutual fund
for which a bank or an investment adviser serves as a fiduciary to
the client plan, in exchange for plan assets transferred in-kind
from a CIF. Specifically, the procedures relate to the methods of
communicating the confirmations described above by personal
delivery, facsimile or electronic mail (see Section I(b) and (g) of
this proposed exemption).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Representations of the Second Fiduciary for the Bank Plans Regarding
the In-Kind Transfers
12. As stated above, Sanwa Bank retained ASA as the Second
Fiduciary for the limited purpose of overseeing the initial in-kind
transfers of CIF assets to the Funds as such transactions would affect
the Bank Plans. In such capacity, ASA represented that it consulted
with its own counsel regarding the fiduciary provisions of the Act and
stated that it understood and accepted the duties, responsibilities and
liabilities in acting as a fiduciary under the Act for the Bank Plans.
In a written report dated September 30, 1997, ASA stated that it
considered the effect of the in-kind transfer transactions on the Bank
Plans and the implications of such transactions for Plans invested in
the CIFs. Based on its review of fees to be charged by the Funds, the
investment guidelines for the Funds and the performance data available
on the CIFs, ASA concluded that the terms of the in-kind transfers were
fair to the participants of the Bank Plans and no less favorable than
the terms that would have been reached among unrelated parties.
13. Based on representations obtained from officers for Sanwa Bank
regarding the termination of the CIFs as well as considering the
effects of the in-kind transfers, ASA represented that the transactions
were in the best interest of the Bank Plans and their participants and
beneficiaries for the following reasons:
(a) In terms of the investment policies and objectives pursued, the
Funds have investment objectives comparable to the CIFs and satisfy the
stated investment policies of the Bank Plans. Thus, in terms of
investment policies and objectives, the impact of the in-kind transfer
transactions on the Bank Plans and their participants and beneficiaries
would be de minimus; 13
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Although the Bank Plans represent a larger portion of the
CIFs that were terminated as well as a larger portion of the Funds,
ASA does not believe the Bank Plans' percentage ownership of the
Funds immediately after the conversion is determinative of whether
the conversion was proper.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) The Funds will probably continue to experience relative
performance similar in nature to the CIFs given the comparability of
investment objectives and policies and the fact that the same portfolio
management personnel will provide portfolio management oversight;
(c) The in-kind transfers would not adversely affect the cash
flows, liquidity or investment diversification of the Bank Plans; and
(d) By investing in the Funds, the Bank Plans would receive a
larger investment base, cost savings to participants over time through
economies of scale, more choices for participants exercising investment
control, the ability to obtain investment information through readily
available sources and fees that would be reasonable and within industry
standards.
14. In forming an opinion as to the appropriateness of the in-kind
transfers, ASA conducted an overall review of the
[[Page 29450]]
Bank Plans, including the Bank Plan documents. ASA stated that it also
examined the investment portfolios of the Bank Plans to ascertain
whether or not the such Plans were in compliance with their investment
objectives and policies. Further, ASA stated that it examined the cash
flow and liquidity requirements of the Bank Plans and the
diversification provided by the investment portfolios of the Bank
Plans. Based on its review and analysis of the foregoing, ASA
represented that the in-kind transfer transactions would not adversely
affect the total investment portfolios of the Bank Plans, compliance by
such Plans with their stated investment objectives and policies, the
cash flows liquidity or diversification requirements of the Bank Plans.
15. As Second Fiduciary, ASA represented that Sanwa Bank would
provide it with any documents it considered necessary to perform its
duties as Second Fiduciary. In this regard, ASA was advised that within
30 days following the initial in-kind transfer transactions, Sanwa Bank
would provide it with the written confirmation statements described
herein. In addition, ASA stated that it would supplement its findings
following the review of the confirmation statements to verify whether
the in-kind transfer transactions had resulted in the receipt by the
Bank Plans of shares in the Funds that were equal in value to such
Plans' pro rata share of assets of the CIFs on the conversion date.
Further, ASA represented that it would take such actions as it deemed
necessary to safeguard the interests of the Bank Plans in the event the
confirmation statements did not verify the foregoing. Finally, ASA
explained that it would maintain, for a period of six years from the
time of the initial conversion transaction (and make available for
review), all relevant records with respect to the performance of its
duties as Second Fiduciary for the Bank Plans.
Receipt of Fees by Sanwa Bank
16. Under certain conditions, PTE 77-4 (42 FR 18732, April 8, 1977)
permits Client Plans of Sanwa Bank to engage in the purchase and sale
of shares of a registered, open-end investment company when Sanwa Bank,
a fiduciary with respect to such Client Plans, is also the investment
adviser for the investment company, provided (a) the Client Plan does
not pay any investment management, investment advisory or similar fees
for the assets of such Plan invested in shares of a Fund for the entire
period of the investment; or (b) where the Client Plan pays investment
management, investment advisory or similar fees to Sanwa Bank based on
the total assets of such Client Plan from which a credit has been
subtracted representing such Plan's pro rata share of such investment
advisory fees paid to Sanwa Bank by the Fund. As such, with respect to
the Client Plans, there may be two levels of fees--(a) those fees which
Sanwa Bank may charge to Client Plans for serving as trustee,
investment manager or custodian for such Plans (the Plan-level fees);
and (b) those fees which Sanwa Bank may charge to the Fund (the Fund-
level fees) for serving as an investment adviser for the Fund as well
as for being custodian of the Fund or for providing other Secondary
Services to the Fund.
17. Since October 31, 1997, Sanwa Bank no longer charges each
Client Plan a Plan-level fee for its services as trustee, investment
manager or custodian based on Sanwa Bank's standard fee schedules and
the terms of specific agreements negotiated between each Client Plan
and Sanwa Bank. Such Plan-level fees included asset-based charges that
were expressed as a percentage of Client Plan assets. Instead, as
permitted by PTE 77-4, for investment advisory services provided to the
Funds, Sanwa Bank is receiving Fund-level advisory fees from each of
the Funds. As stated above in Representation 1(d), these fees, which
are also expressed as a percentage of a Fund's assets currently range
from 0.10 percent to 0.80 percent per annum of the daily average assets
of the U.S. Treasury Obligations Fund and the Global Asset Allocation
Fund, respectively.14
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ It should be noted that Sanwa Bank has agreed to
temporarily waive the amount of its investment advisory fees through
the end of the Funds' initial fiscal year. Without the waiver, the
per annum investment advisory fees for the U.S. Treasury Obligations
Fund and the Global Asset Allocation Fund would range from 0.20
percent to 0.90 percent per annum of the Fund's daily average
assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to charging Fund-level investment advisory fees, Sanwa
Bank is charging Client Plans for Plan-level recordkeeping,
administrative, accounting and custodial services which do not involve
investment management, such as custody of plan assets, maintaining plan
records, preparing periodic reports of plan assets and participant
accounts, effecting participant investment directions, processing
participant loans and accounting for contributions, payments of
benefits and other receipts and distributions. Sanwa Bank's fees for
such Plan-level services will continue to be negotiated with each
Client Plan and its fees for such services for Bank Plans will continue
to be limited to the reimbursement of direct expenses properly and
actually incurred in the performance of the services.15
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Sanwa Bank represents that it is relying upon section
408(b)(2) with respect to its receipt of fees for such
administrative services. The Department expresses no opinion herein
on whether the provision of such services will satisfy section
408(b)(2) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At present, all services other than investment advisory services
are provided to the Funds or their distributor by unrelated parties.
However, as stated above, Sanwa Bank represents that the Funds may, in
the future, wish to contract with it or an affiliate to provide
administrative, custodial, transfer, accounting or similar services
(i.e., Secondary Services) to the Funds or their
distributor.16
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The fact that certain transactions and fee arrangements are
the subject of an administrative exemption does not relieve the
fiduciaries of the Client Plans from the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404 of the Act. Thus, the
Department cautions Second Fiduciaries of the Client Plans investing
in the Funds that they have an ongoing duty under section 404 of the
Act to monitor the services provided to such Plans to assure that
the fees paid by the Client Plans for such services are reasonable
in relation to the value of the services provided. These
responsibilities would include determinations that the services
provided are not duplicative and that the fees are reasonable in
light of the level of services provided.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Future Fee Changes and Client Plan Authorization Requirements
18. Sanwa Bank notes that one of the requirements of PTE 77-4 is
that any change in any of the rates of fees requires the prior written
approval by the Second Fiduciary of the Plans participating in the
Funds. Where many Plans participate in a Fund, Sanwa Bank observes that
the addition of a service or any good faith increase in fees could not
be implemented until written approval of such change is obtained from
every Second Fiduciary. As an alternative, Sanwa Bank proposes to
follow the ``negative consent'' procedure which it believes provides
the basic safeguards for the Plans and is more efficient, cost
effective and administratively feasible that required by PTE 77-4.
The negative consent procedure would apply in the following
circumstances: (a) an increase in the rate of any Fund-level investment
management, investment advisory or similar fees; (b) a proposal by
Sanwa Bank or an affiliate to provide a Secondary Service to a Fund for
a fee; and (c) an increase in the fee for a Secondary Service paid by a
Fund to Sanwa Bank or its affiliates over an existing rate that had
been authorized by the Second Fiduciary. In this regard, an increase in
fees for Secondary Services can result either from an increase in the
rate of such fee or from
[[Page 29451]]
a decrease in the number or kind of services performed by Sanwa Bank or
its affiliates for such fee over that which had been authorized by the
Second Fiduciary of a Client Plan. Under such circumstances, Sanwa Bank
will provide at least 30 days advance notice of the implementation of a
proposed fee increase to Client Plans invested in the affected Fund.
The notice will take the form of a proxy statement, letter or similar
communication which is separate from the Fund's prospectus and which
explains the nature and amount of the additional service or the nature
and amount of the fee increase.17
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The Department notes that an increase in the amount of a
fee for an existing investment advisory service or a Secondary
Service (other than through an increase in the value of the
underlying assets in the Funds), or the imposition of a fee for a
newly-established Secondary Service shall be considered an increase
in the rate of such fees. However, in the event an investment
advisory fee or a fee for a Secondary Service has already been
described in writing to the Second Fiduciary and the Second
Fiduciary has provided authorization for the amount of such fee, and
such fee has been waived, no further action by Sanwa Bank will be
required in order for Sanwa Bank to receive such fee at a later
time. Thus, for example, no further disclosure would be necessary if
Sanwa Bank has received authorization for a fee for custodial
services from a Client Plan investor and subsequently determined to
waive the fee for a period of time in order to attract new investors
but later charged the fee. However, reinstituting the fee at an
amount greater than previously disclosed would necessitate Sanwa
Bank providing notice of the fee increase and a Termination Form in
the manner described above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
19. The written notice of a fee increase or additional Secondary
Service for which a fee is charged will be accompanied by a Termination
Form. The Termination Form will enable the Second Fiduciary to
terminate any prior authorization to invest Client Plan assets in a
Fund or Funds without penalty to the affected Client Plan. In addition,
each Client Plan will be supplied with a Termination Form annually
during the first quarter of each calendar year, regardless of whether
there has been any fee increase or additional Secondary Service for
which a fee is charged. If, however, the Termination Form has been
provided to the Client Plan in connection with a fee increase or an
additional Secondary Service for which a fee is charged, the
Termination Form need not be provided again to the client Plan until at
least six months have elapsed, unless such Termination Form is required
to be sent sooner as a result of another fee increase or an addition of
such Secondary Services.
The Termination Form will be accompanied by instructions which
state that any relevant authorization previously given by the Second
Fiduciary is terminable at will be the Second Fiduciary, without
penalty to the Plan, and that failure to return the Form will be deemed
to be an approval of the fee increase or the additional Secondary
Service and will result in the continuation of such authorization.
Termination of an authorization to invest Client Plan assets in the
Funds will result in the redemption of shares of the Fund held by the
Plan by the close of business on the business day following the date of
receipt by Sanwa Bank of the Termination Form or any other written
notice of termination, either by mail, hand delivery, facsimile or
other available means of written communication at the option of the
Second Fiduciary. If, due to circumstances beyond the control of Sanwa
Bank, the redemption cannot be effected within one business day, Sanwa
Bank will have one additional business day to complete such redemption.
20. Although an investment in the Funds may result in an overall
cost increase to many of the Client Plans, the Second Fiduciary will be
obligated to take such impact into account in determining whether to
authorize the Plans' investment in the Funds. In any event, such
additional costs will be consistent with the costs of similar
alternative investments that will be available to the Plans upon the
termination of the CIFs. In this respect, Sanwa Bank believes that as
to each Plan, the combined total of all Plan-level and Fund-level fees
received by Sanwa Bank for the provision of services to the Client
Plans and to the Funds, respectively, will not be in excess of
``reasonable compensation'' within the meaning of section 408(b)(2) of
the Act.
21. The requested exemption will be subject to the satisfaction of
certain general conditions that will further protect the interests of
the Plans. For example, the transactions will be subject to the prior
authorization of a Second Fiduciary, acting on behalf of each Plan, who
has been provided with the written disclosures described above. The
Second Fiduciary generally will be the administrator, sponsor or a
committee appointed by the sponsor to act as a named fiduciary for a
Client Plan or, in the case of the Bank Plans, a qualified party
independent of Sanwa Bank.
22. With respect to disclosure, the Second Fiduciary of each Plan
will receive advance written notice of the in-kind transfer of assets
of the CIFs and written disclosure of information concerning the Funds
consistent with PTE 77-4 and PTE 97-41. Among the disclosures that will
be given to the Second Fiduciary include, but are not limited to, the
following: (a) a current prospectus for each portfolio of each of the
Funds in which the Client Plan may invest; (b) a statement describing
the fees for investment advisory or other similar services, any fees
for Secondary Services, and all other fees to be charged to or paid by
the Client Plan and by such Funds to Sanwa Bank, including the nature
and extent of any differential between the rates of such fees; (c) a
statement of the reasons why Sanwa Bank may consider such investment to
be appropriate for the Client Plan; (d) a statement of whether there
are any limitations applicable to Sanwa Bank with respect to which
assets of a Client Plan may be invested in Fund shares, and, if so, the
nature of such limitations; and (e) a copy of the proposed exemption
and/or a copy of the final exemption upon the request of the Second
Fiduciary.
On the basis of the disclosures, the Second Fiduciary must
authorize in writing the investment of Plan assets in shares of the
Fund in connection with the transactions described herein as well as
the compensation received by Sanwa Bank (or its affiliates) in
connection with its services to the Funds. Such written authorization
will extend to only those Funds with respect to which the Plan has
received the written disclosures referred to above and which are
specifically mentioned in such disclosures.
Having obtained the authorization of the Second Fiduciary, Sanwa
Bank will invest the assets of a Plan among the Funds, subject to
satisfaction of the other terms and conditions of the requested
exemption. Sanwa Bank will not, however, invest the assets of a Plan in
any Fund not specifically mentioned in the written disclosure and
authorization described above. If a new Fund were established, Sanwa
Bank would invest assets of a Plan in such new Fund under the requested
exemption only after providing the required disclosures and obtaining a
separate written authorization from the Second Fiduciary which
specifically mentions the new Fund.
23. In addition to the disclosures provided to the Plan prior to
investment in a Fund, Sanwa Bank will provide, at least annually to the
Second Fiduciary of each Client Plan, an updated prospectus of each
Fund in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act and applicable
SEC rules. Further, the Second Fiduciary will be supplied, upon
request, with a report or statement (which may take the form of the
most recent financial report of the Funds, the current statement of
additional information or some other written statement) containing a
description of
[[Page 29452]]
all fees paid by the Funds. Finally, all dealings by or between the
Client Plans and any Fund will be on a basis which is no less favorable
to such Plans than dealings between the Fund and other non-Plan
shareholders holding the same class of shares as the Client Plans.
Although it does not anticipate doing so initially, Sanwa Bank or
an affiliate may in the future execute securities brokerage
transactions for some or all of the Funds, as and to the extent
permitted by the 1940 Act and applicable SEC rules. If and when Sanwa
Bank proposes to provide brokerage services to any Fund for
compensation, Sanwa Bank will, at least 30 days in advance of the
implementation of such service, provide written notice to the Client
Plans explaining the nature of such brokerage services and the amount
of the fees to be paid therefor. Further, with respect to any Fund for
which Sanwa Bank provides brokerage services, Sanwa Bank will provide,
at least annually to each Client Plan that invests in such Fund a
written disclosure indicating (a) the total brokerage commissions paid
by the Fund to Sanwa Bank, expressed in dollars; (b) the total
brokerage commissions paid by the Fund to brokerage firms unrelated to
Sanwa Bank, expressed in dollars; (c) the average brokerage commissions
per share paid by the Fund to Sanwa Bank, expressed as cents per share;
and (d) the average brokerage commissions per share paid by the Fund to
brokerage firms unrelated to Sanwa Bank, expressed as cents per share.
24. In addition to the foregoing, the requested exemption will be
subject to the following requirements: (a) the Plans and other
investors will purchase or redeem Fund shares in accordance with
standard procedures described in the prospectus for each Fund; (b) no
Plan will pay a sales commission or redemption fee in connection with
the purchase or redemption of Fund shares; (c) Sanwa Bank will not
purchase from or sell to any Plan shares of the Fund; (d) the price
paid or received by the Plans for Fund shares will be the net asset
value per share at the time of such purchase or redemption and will be
the same price as any other investor would pay or receive for shares of
the same class.
25. In summary, it is represented that the transactions have
satisfied or will satisfy the statutory criteria for an exemption under
section 408(a) of the Act because:
(a) With respect to the in-kind transfer of the assets of a Plan
invested in a CIF in exchange for shares of a Fund, a Second Fiduciary
has authorized or will authorize in writing, such in-kind transfer
prior to the transaction only after receiving full written disclosure
of information concerning the Fund.
(b) Each Plan has received or will receive shares of the Funds in
connection with the transfer of assets of a terminating CIF which have
a total net asset value that is equal to the value of such Plan's pro
rata share of the CIF assets on the date of the transfer as determined
in a single valuation performed in the same manner and at the close of
the business day, using independent sources in accordance with
procedures established by the Funds which comply with Rule 17a-7 of the
1940 Act, as amended, and the procedures established by the Funds
pursuant to Rule 17a-7 for the valuation of such assets.
(c) Sanwa Bank has sent or will send by regular mail or personal
delivery, or, if applicable, by facsimile or electronic mail, no later
than 30 days after completion of each in-kind transfer of CIF assets in
exchange for shares of the Funds, a written confirmation containing the
following information: (1) the identity of each transferred security
that was valued for purposes of the transaction in accordance with Rule
17a-7(b)(4) of the 1940 Act; (2) the current market price, as of the
date of the in-kind transfer, of each such security involved in the
transaction; and (3) the identity of each pricing service or market
maker consulted in determining the current market price of such
securities.
(d) Sanwa Bank has sent or will send by regular mail, or personal
delivery, or, if applicable, by facsimile or electronic mail, no later
than 105 days after completion of each transfer, a written confirmation
that contains the following information: (1) the number of CIF units
held by a Plan immediately before the conversion (and the related per
unit value and the total dollar amount of such CIF units); and (2) the
number of shares in the Funds that are held by the Plan following the
conversion (and the related per share net asset value and the total
dollar amount of the shares received).
(e) The price that has been or will be paid or received by a Plan
for shares of the Funds is the net asset value per share at the time of
the transaction and is the same price for the shares which will be paid
or received by any other investor at that time.
(f) No sales commissions or redemption fees have been or will be
paid by a Plan or a CIF in connection with the in-kind transfer of
assets to the Fund, in exchange for shares of the Funds or in
connection with the purchase or redemption of Fund shares by a Plan.
(g) For each Client Plan, the combined total of all fees received
by Sanwa Bank for the provision of Plan-level services, and in
connection with the provision of investment advisory services or
Secondary Services to any of the Funds in which Plans may invest, is
not and will not be in excess of ``reasonable compensation'' within the
meaning of section 408(b)(2) of the Act.
(h) Sanwa Bank has not received and will not receive any 12b-1 Fees
in connection with the transactions.
(i) Any authorizations made by a Client Plan regarding investments
in the Funds and the fees paid to Sanwa Bank (including increases in
the contractual rates of fees for Secondary Services that are retained
by the Sanwa Bank) will be terminable at will by the Client Plan,
without penalty to the Client Plan and will be effected within one
business day following receipt by Sanwa Bank, from the Second
Fiduciary, of the Termination Form or any other written notice of
termination, unless circumstances beyond the control of Sanwa Bank
delay execution for no more than one additional business day.
(j) The Second Fiduciary will receive written notice accompanied by
the Termination Form with instructions on the use of the form at least
30 days in advance of the implementation of any increase in the rate of
any fees paid by the Funds to Sanwa Bank regarding investment advisory
services, fees for Secondary Services or an additional Secondary
Service for which a fee is charged which exceed the rates authorized
for Sanwa Bank by the Second Fiduciary.
(k) All dealings by or between the Client Plans and any Fund have
been and will remain on a basis which is no less favorable to such
Client Plans than dealings between the Fund and other non-Plan
shareholders holding the same class of shares as the Client Plans.
Notice to Interested Persons
Sanwa Bank proposes to provide notice of the proposed exemption to
the Second Fiduciary of the Bank Plans, active participants in the Bank
Plans and the Second Fiduciary of each affected Client Plan. Notice
will be provided to each Second Fiduciary by first class mail and to
active participants in the Bank Plans by posting at major job sites.
Such notice will be given to interested persons within 30 days
following the publication of the notice of pendency in the Federal
Register. The notice will include a copy of the notice of proposed
exemption as published in the Federal Register as
[[Page 29453]]
well as a supplemental statement, as required, pursuant to 29 CFR
2570.43(b)(2), which shall inform interested persons of their right to
comment on and/or to request a hearing. Comments and requests for a
public hearing are due within 60 days of the publication of the notice
of proposed exemption in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jan D. Broady of the Department,
telephone (202) 219-8881. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Plumbers and Pipe Fitters National Pension Fund (the Fund) Located
in Crofton, MD
[Exemption Application No. D-10514]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part
2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). If the exemption
is granted, the restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A), 406(a)(1)(B),
406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1), and 406(b)(2) of the Act and the sanctions
resulting from the application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason
of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code 18 shall
not apply, effective October 9, 1997, to the transfer to the Fund from
the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing
and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO (the
Union), a party in interest with respect to the Fund, of the Union's
limited partnership interests in Diplomat Properties, Limited
Partnership, (the Partnership), the sole asset of which is a certain
resort hotel and country club complex (the Property); and to the
transfer to the Fund of Union's holding of stock in Diplomat
Properties, Inc. (the Stock), the corporate general partner of such
Partnership, in consideration for a capital contribution by the Fund to
the Partnership in the amount of $40 million dollars, plus reasonable
costs incurred by the Union in purchasing the Property, and in
consideration for the release of a certain loan obligation (the Loan)
of the Partnership which was guaranteed by the Union and collateralized
by Union assets; provided that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ For purposes of this exemption, references to specific
provisions of Title I of the Act, unless otherwise specified, refer
also to the corresponding provisions of the Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) the transaction was a one-time transaction;
(2) an I/F which has the following qualifications acted on behalf
of the Fund:
(a) the I/F is an individual, group of individuals, or a business
entity which has substantial experience and expertise in the commercial
real estate field;
(b) neither the I/F nor any of its affiliates have any ownership or
other interest in the Union or its affiliates, nor does the Union or
any of its affiliates have any ownership interest in the I/F or its
affiliates; and
(c) neither the I/F nor its affiliates engages in any business
transactions with the Union or its affiliates.
(3) prior to the Fund entering the transaction, the I/F reviewed
and approved the terms of the transaction, determined that the
transaction was an appropriate investment for the Fund, that the amount
paid by the Fund to acquire ownership of the Property through the
Partnership was appropriate and fair, that the total costs incurred
were necessary for the acquisition of the Property and were reasonable,
and that the transaction was in the best interest of the Fund and its
participants and beneficiaries;
(4) the fair market value of the Property held by the Partnership
was determined by an independent, qualified appraiser, as of the date
of the transaction;
(5) the Fund paid no fees or commissions as a result of the
transaction; and
(6) the terms of the transaction were no less favorable to the Fund
than those it would have received under similar circumstances when
negotiated at arm's length with unrelated third parties.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. The Fund is a Taft-Hartley multi-employer defined benefit
pension fund, as defined in section 3(37) of the Act.19 The
Fund is funded solely by employer contributions negotiated under
collective bargaining agreements with the Union. As of January 1997, it
is represented that the Fund received contributions from 5,187 active
employers. As of October 3, 1997, there were estimated to be 97,988
participants and beneficiaries of the Fund. As of June 30, 1997, the
Fund had assets of approximately $3.166 billion. It is represented that
the transaction which is the subject of this proposed exemption
involved less than 2 percent (2%) of the total assets of the Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ It is represented that the Fund is the successor to the
former Sabine Area Pipefitters Local No. 195 Pension Trust Fund,
which was involved in the correction of a 1988 prohibited
transaction that had occurred before the former Local 195 Pension
Fund merged into the Fund in 1990. It is represented that the
correction of the prohibited transaction did not involve any assets
of the National Pension Fund except to the extent that the Local 195
Joint Apprenticeship Committee was assessed first tier excise taxes
under section 4975 of the Code for its use of assets of the former
Local 195 Pension Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Fund is administered from its offices in Crofton, MD by the
plan administrator. Six (6) individuals serve as members of the Board
of Trustees (the Trustees) of the Fund. Three of the Trustees are
appointed by employers who contribute to the Fund, and three of the
Trustees are appointed by the Union. The three Trustees selected by the
Union also serve as officers of the Union. As fiduciaries to the Fund,
the Trustees are parties in interest with respect to the Fund within
the meaning of section 3(14)(A) of the Act.
2. The Union is an employee organization some of whose members
participate in the Fund. As such, the Union is a party in interest with
respect to the Fund within the meaning of section 3(14) of the Act.
3. The Property, located in Hollywood and Hallandale, Florida, was
constructed in the late 1950's and consists of several parcels,
including a oceanfront hotel, a vacant parcel of oceanfront real
estate, a motel, a golf course, a clubhouse with tennis courts, and a
marina. The hotel consists of two towers containing a total of 655
rooms. The north tower is the older of the towers and is in poor
condition. The south tower has 256 rooms, large convention areas, and a
parking garage. It is represented that the hotel at one time operated
as a premier hotel and country club catering to the middle income
convention trade, but due to a decline in the market, the hotel has
been closed since 1992.
The vacant parcel, located on a 2.99-acre oceanfront site,
functions as a parking lot. The motel, located on the Intracoastal
Waterway and across the street from the hotel, has approximately 300
rooms, only 150 of which are operational. The golf course, containing
122.91 acres, is represented to be in relatively good shape and
continues to function as a low budget operation. It is represented that
the clubhouse and tennis courts are in need of upgrading. In the
alternative, the real estate underlying the clubhouse and tennis courts
could be re-zoned for residential use. The marina, the newest addition
to the Property, provides a 52-slip facility, offering a number of
finger piers, and a covered gazebo. It is represented that twelve (12)
of the boat slips are under annual leases, and that the marina is
subject to a long-term lease with a local yacht club.
4. The Union Labor Life Insurance Company (ULLICO) acquired,
through
[[Page 29454]]
foreclosure, ownership of the Property as a result of a default by an
unrelated third party on a mortgage loan. In this regard, in May 1991,
title to the Property was transferred to TNDL Limited (TNDL), a wholly-
owned subsidiary of ULLICO.
Early in 1997, TNDL placed the Property on the market for sale. It
is represented that as a result of this public solicitation, TNDL
received seven or eight bids from prospective purchasers, including the
Union and at least one from a well-known hotel chain.
It is represented that when the Property was offered for sale, the
Trustees of the Fund were interested in acquiring it as an investment
for the Fund. However, a non-negotiable condition in the sale offer by
TNDL excluded assets of any employee benefit fund subject to the Act
from being used to purchase the Property.
5. The successful bidder on the Property was the Union which
purchased the Property on October 1, 1997, for $40 million in cash,
plus expenses incurred by the Union in acquiring the Property. Upon the
advice of counsel, the Union chose to acquire and hold title to the
Property through its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Partnership, in order
to avoid state real property transfer taxes that would otherwise arise
upon any subsequent sale of the Property.
It is represented that the Partnership obtained the money to
purchase the Property from the proceeds of the Loan from the National
City Bank of Cleveland, Ohio (the Bank). It is represented that
repayment of the Loan by the Partnership was guaranteed by the Union.
The Loan was secured by cash, cash equivalents, and securities owned by
the Union and held by the Bank in a custodial account.
The term of the Loan was two (2) years with no prepayment penalty.
The payment schedule consisted of payments only of interest for 23
months with a balloon payment of the principal amount, plus accrued
interest in the 24th month. The interest rate on the Loan was the
Bank's 7-day money market rate, adjusted weekly. It is represented that
the $25,000 origination loan fee charged by the Bank on the Loan was
withheld from the $40 million dollar Loan made to the Partnership by
the Bank.
6. At the time the Partnership acquired the Property, an appraisal
of the Property was prepared by Bruce C. Roe (Mr. Roe), President, and
Zillah L. Tarkoe, Senior Analyst, of Roe Research, Inc., in Ft.
Lauderdale, Florida. It is represented that the appraisers are
qualified in that each is licensed by the State of Florida as a state-
certified general real estate appraiser. It is further represented that
Mr. Roe is a Member of the American Society of Real Estate Counselors
(CRE) and a Member of the Appraisal Institute (MAI).
It is represented that the appraisers are independent in that
neither has a present or prospective interest in the Property, nor has
either any personal interest or bias with respect to the parties
involved. Neither the employment nor the compensation of the appraisers
was conditioned upon the reporting of a predetermined value or
direction in value of the Property.
After physically inspecting the Property and reconciling the values
for the Property established by the cost approach, income approach, and
sales comparison approach, the appraisers established a separate value,
based on fee simple interest ``as is,'' for each of the parcels which
make up the Property, including the oceanfront hotel, the vacant
oceanfront parcel, the motel, the golf course and club house, and the
marina. The sum of these separate values for each of the parcels was
$44,350,000, as of August 8, 1997. Including a 10 percent (10%)
discount for a bulk sale of all of the parcels of the Property ``as
is'' to a single purchaser, the fair market value of the Property, was
determined by the appraisers to be $40 million, as of August 8, 1997.
7. It is represented that on October 9, 1997, the Union and the
Fund closed on the transaction that is the subject of this proposed
exemption. Accordingly, the Fund, as applicant, has requested a
retroactive exemption, effective October 9, 1997, to permit the past
transfer from the Union to the Fund of the Union's limited partnership
interests in the Partnership and the Stock in the corporate general
partner of the Partnership which was owned by the Union. In this
regard, it is represented that the Union owned 100 percent of the Stock
of the corporate general partner of the Partnership. As general
partner, the corporation owned one percent (1%) of the outstanding
interest in the Partnership. The other 99 percent (99%) of the
interests in the Partnership were owned by the Union, as limited
partner.
It is represented that at the time of the sale of the Property to
the Partnership, there existed no agreement pursuant to which the
Partnership was obligated to sell the Property to any third party or
pursuant to which any third party was obligated to buy the Property,
including the Fund. Further, at the time of the sale of the Property to
the Partnership, there existed no agreement pursuant to which the Union
was obligated to sell its interest in the Partnership to any third
party or pursuant to which a third party was obligated to buy the
Union's interest in the Partnership, including the Fund. Finally, there
never existed any agreement or understanding between TNDL and the Fund
with respect to the purchase of the Property by the Fund. In this
regard, it is represented that TNDL's representatives were unaware that
the Trustees of the Fund were contemplating purchasing the Property
after it was sold by TNDL to the Union.
It is represented that in consideration for the transfer by the
Union of the Stock and the limited partnership interests, the Fund made
a capital contribution to the Partnership in the amount of $40 million
dollars. In addition, the Fund agreed to reimburse the Union for the
following expenditures (totaling $367,605) which were incurred by the
Union in purchasing the Property: (a) attorney hourly fees, travel, and
other expenses ($215,756) paid to persons unrelated to the Fund; (b)
due diligence fees (e.g., geotechnical, evaluation, updated boundary
surveys, appraisal fees) ($42,643); (c) a letter of credit fee ($8,406)
paid to the issuer, NationsBank; and (d) earnest money deposit of
$100,000 paid into escrow and credited to the Partnership at closing,
plus $800 of interest accrued in escrow. It is represented that the
letter of credit fee resulted from a term in the sale contract with
TNDL, the seller of the Property, which required that the earnest money
deposit be in the form of a letter of credit. Further, some due
diligence and other fees not included in the amounts set forth above
were incurred by the Union prior to the establishment of the
Partnership. It is represented that these due diligence and other fees
include the following: (a) $647.50 custodian fee paid to National City
Bank; (b) $2,978 paid to CT Corporation for assistance in establishing
the Partnership and the corporate general partner of the Partnership;
and (c) $75,000 to the I/F for the initial opinion on the value of the
Property. It is represented that these amounts were paid by the
Partnership and/or the Fund subsequent to the closing on the Property
and the transfer of the ownership of the Partnership to the
Fund.20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The Department notes that the actions of the Trustees
relying on the advice of the I/F and acting on behalf of the Fund,
in connection with its consideration of the merits of the
acquisition of the limited partnership interests in the Partnership
and the Stock of the corporate general partner of the Partnership as
an investment for the Fund and the subsequent acquisition and
holding of the Property are governed by the fiduciary responsibility
requirements of part 4, subpart B, of Title I. The Department
expresses no opinion herein, as to whether any of the relevant
provisions of part 4, subpart B, of Title I have been violated
regarding the Fund's investment in the Partnership and subsequent
holding of the Property, and no exemption from such provisions is
proposed herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 29455]]
Because the Property was the sole asset of the Partnership, it is
represented that the economic effect of the transfer which is the
subject of this proposed exemption for all practical purposes was the
same as a sale of the Property by the Union to the Fund. Subsequent to
the transfer, it is represented that the capital contribution made by
the Fund to the Partnership was used to retire the Loan between the
Bank and the Partnership. In this regard, it is represented that on
October 10, 1997, the Fund transferred directly to the Bank sufficient
assets to pay off the Loan.
8. It is represented that the transaction which is the subject of
this proposed exemption was in the interest of the Fund, because it
provided a valuable investment opportunity to the Fund which it is
represented will result in a superior return.
Further, it is represented that the cities of Hollywood and
Hallandale support the redevelopment of the Property. In this regard,
it is represented that additional funding for the development of the
Property is under consideration by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development through a community development loan guarantee
program for projects that produce full time job opportunities for low
income residents. Additionally, it is represented that the Fund's
ownership of the Property through the limited partnership structure
will permit the Fund to avoid the liabilities associated with a more
direct ownership of real estate and will not threaten the tax exempt
status of the Fund.
9. In the opinion of the Trustees, an important safeguard in this
proposed exemption is that an I/F, acting on behalf of the Fund,
reviewed and approved the subject transaction, and that such I/F
concluded that the transaction was prudent and in the interests of the
participants and beneficiaries of the Fund. It is represented that, as
of September 22, 1997, Chadwick, Saylor & Co. Inc. (CSC) was retained
by the Trustees to act as I/F on behalf of the Fund. As a result, CSC
provided the Trustees with a report of its opinion of the subject
transaction, dated September 29, 1997, a supplemental report of the
same date, a subsequent report, dated December 15, 1997, and an
additional letter dated, May 11, 1998.
CSC has acknowledged that as I/F it was solely responsible to the
Fund. In this regard, it is represented that the fee of the I/F was
paid by the Fund. It is further represented that CSC is independent in
that there is no relationship between the Union and CSC, and that CSC
is not related to or affiliated with the Fund. Further, CSC represents
that it had no conflicts affecting its ability to serve as the I/F and
to provide an independent evaluation of the transaction which is the
subject of this proposed exemption.
CSC represents that it is an investment advisor registered under
the Investment Advisors Act of 1940; that it possesses substantial
expertise in the area of commercial real estate investments; and that
it is qualified to provide the independent fiduciary services required.
In this regard, either CSC or its principals have represented in excess
of forty (40) tax exempt institutional real estate investors (private
and public pensions, endowments and foundations) in a fiduciary
capacity.
In fulfilling its role as I/F, CSC received and reviewed the Fund's
policy statement and various reports, schedules, and other material
provided by the Fund's consultants, real estate managers, and various
professionals. Included in the information reviewed by CSC is the
following: (a) the sale and purchase agreement between the Union and
TNDL, and attachments and related correspondence; (b) documents, plans,
surveys, and maps pertaining to existing and anticipated improvements
on the Property; (c) documents, maps, and other correspondence
pertaining to the condition of title of the Property, including
encumbrances, taxes and other liens, and information on certain
adjacent sites; (d) ordinances and other information relating to zoning
and building codes; (e) the statement of value of the Property from the
independent appraisers; and (f) preliminary feasibility studies,
status, and condition reports related to the contemplated development
and redevelopment of the Property.
After reviewing the material listed above, CSC is of the opinion
that the Fund's investment in the Partnership represents a moderate
expenditure of capital (based on the Fund's overall investment
portfolio) to produce disproportionately high returns. In this regard,
CSC believes that the probable internal rate of return to the Fund will
be in excess of 15% from its investment in the Property and successful
conclusion of development and redevelopment efforts over the next
several years. It is further represented that this rate of return is
substantially greater than the overall rate of return experienced by
the Fund from its current real estate portfolio. Based on
diversification characteristics of the investment in the Partnership,
CSC believes that the Fund will enjoy a very competitive risk-adjusted
return from its investment.
With respect to diversification of the assets of the Fund, CSC
represents that allowing for the subject transaction, equity real
estate represents less than 6 percent (6%) of the Fund's total
investment portfolio. It is further represented that the total real
estate commitments of the Fund, including the 6% equity position and
non-equity debt type investments (e.g. loans, bonds, mortgages, and
mortgage-backed securities), were slightly in excess of 15 percent
(15%) of the Fund's total investment portfolio, as of June 30, 1997.
CSC recognized the degree of risk assumed by the acquisition of
properties which are generally unoccupied and are in need of
development or redevelopment to become occupied and to generate a
positive cash flow. Based on the risk/reward characteristics of the
subject transaction, CSC is of the opinion that the acquisition cost
(which represents approximately 1.2 percent (1.2%) of the Fund's total
investment portfolio, as of June 30, 1997) is an appropriate
expenditure and does not represent unwarranted risk.
With respect to the appraisal of the Property prepared by Roe
Research, Inc., CSC believes that the $40 million dollar value ascribed
to the Property is appropriate and fair. However, CSC did not subscribe
to the ``bulk sale discount'' for the Property, as set forth in the
appraisal report. In the opinion of CSC, the value of the unique
characteristics of the Property, offering a ``self-contained'' resort
complex, collectively could be greater than the value determined by
individual transactions on the various parcels which make up the
Property.
In the opinion of CSC, the amount (approximately $40 million
dollars, plus reasonable costs) paid by the Fund to acquire the
Property does not exceed the fair market value of such Property at the
time of acquisition, including consideration for miscellaneous costs,
presuming that such costs when fully identified are customary and
reasonable and do not exceed the costs incurred by the Union in its
purchase of the Property from TNDL. With regard to such costs, CSC in
May 1998, after reviewing the total acquisition cost schedule,
including financing related costs, legal fees, property specific
[[Page 29456]]
related costs, and the cost of the I/F's valuation, opined that all
enumerated acquisition costs were reasonable and that the costs that
were incurred were necessary for making a prudent decision on the
acquisition of the Property.
In the opinion of CSC, it is appropriate for the Fund to hold title
to the Property through the Partnership where the Fund owns 100 percent
(100%) of the Stock of the corporate general partner of such
Partnership. In this regard, it is CSC's assumption that the
Partnership may be restructured in the future to accommodate tax or
other issues, to sell a portion of the Property, or to accommodate co-
investor or lender capital funding. In this regard, it is represented
that such holding by the Fund will permit the Fund to avoid liabilities
associated with a more direct ownership of real estate and will not
threaten the tax-exempt status of the Fund.
CSC recognizes that certain aspects of the Fund's investment in the
Partnership could potentially cause unrelated business income tax
(UBTI) to the Fund. In this regard, CSC has been advised by counsel to
the Fund that the structuring of the Fund's ownership, operations, and
sales will be focused on minimizing any tax consequence to the Fund.
Based on this advice of counsel, it is CSC's opinion that the risk-
adjusted returns to the Fund, including consideration for potential
UBTI, fully justify the acquisition, and development/redevelopment
processes planned by the Fund for the Property.
In September 1997, when CSC issued its opinion, certain budgets,
cash flows, or schedules pertaining to the development, redevelopment,
operation and potential of the various components of the Property were
not available. In addition, CSC's opinions as to the fairness of the
transaction were based on certain assumptions related to functions yet
to be performed or completed and certain permits and approvals yet to
be received. Notwithstanding these facts, in the course of its review
of materials with respect to the subject transaction, it is represented
that nothing came to the attention of CSC that indicated that these
matters could not be favorably resolved, and in CSC's opinion, it is
reasonable for the Fund to assume that such matters will be favorable
resolved.
Therefore, based on all of the information CSC reviewed as of the
date of its initial opinion and affirmed in its subsequent report, CSC
concludes, solely on behalf of the Fund, that the acquisition price in
the amount of $40 million, plus reasonable costs is appropriate and
fair. Moreover, based on the foregoing, it is CSC opinion that the
transaction which is the subject of this exemption represents a prudent
investment for the Fund and is in the best interest of the participants
and beneficiaries of the Fund.
10. In summary, the applicant, represents that the proposed
transaction meets the statutory criteria for an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act because:
(1) The transaction was a one-time transaction;
(2) The I/F acted on behalf of the Fund;
(3) Prior to entering the transaction, the I/F reviewed approved
the terms of the transaction, determined that the transaction was an
appropriate investment for the Fund, that the amount paid by the Fund
to acquire ownership of the Property through the Partnership was fair
and reasonable, that the total costs incurred were necessary for the
acquisition of the Property and were reasonable, and that the
transaction was in the best interest of the Fund and its participants
and beneficiaries;
(4) The fair market value of the Property held by the Partnership
was determined by an independent, qualified appraiser;
(5) The Fund paid no fees or commissions as a result of the
transaction; and
(6) The terms of the transaction were no less favorable to the Fund
than those it would have received under similar circumstances when
negotiated at arm's length with unrelated third parties.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelena C. Le Blanc of the
Department, telephone (202) 219-8883 (This is not a toll-free number.)
Collection Bureau Services Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (the
Plan), Located in Missoula, MT
[Application No. D-10525]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part
2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). If the exemption
is granted, the restrictions of sections 406(a), 406(b)(1) and (b)(2)
of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the application of section
4975 of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1) (A) through (E) of
the Code, shall not apply to (1) the proposed lease (the Lease) by the
Plan of certain improved real property (the Property) to Collection
Bureau Services (the Employer), a party in interest with respect to the
Plan, and (2) the possible purchase of the Property by the Employer in
the future, pursuant to the Employer's option to purchase the Property
under the Lease.
This proposed exemption is subject to the following conditions:
(1) The Plan is represented for all purposes under the Lease by a
qualified, independent fiduciary;
(2) The terms and conditions of the Lease are at least as favorable
to the Plan as those the Plan could obtain in a comparable arm's length
transaction with an unrelated party;
(3) The rent paid to the Plan under the Lease is no less than the
fair market rental value of the Property, as established by a
qualified, independent appraiser;
(4) The rent is adjusted, at a minimum, every three years, based
upon an updated independent appraisal of the Property, but in no event
shall such adjustments result in the rent being less than the rental
amount for the Property existing for the preceding period;
(5) The Lease is triple net (with all expenses for maintenance,
taxes, and insurance to be borne by the Employer as the tenant);
(6) The independent fiduciary for the Plan (the I/F) reviews the
terms and conditions of the Lease on behalf of the Plan and determines
that the Lease is in the best interests of, and appropriate for, the
Plan;
(7) The I/F monitors and enforces compliance with all of the terms
and conditions of the Lease, and of the exemption (if granted),
throughout the duration of the Lease;
(8) The I/F expressly approves any improvements by the Employer to
the Property, any renewal of the Lease beyond the initial term, and any
sale of the Property to the Employer, pursuant to the Employer's option
to purchase the Property under the Lease;
(9) In the event that the Employer exercises its option to purchase
the Property under the Lease, the Employer pays the Plan an amount
which is the greater of either (a) the original acquisition cost of the
Property, plus holding expenses, or (b) the fair market value of the
Property, as of the date of the sale, as established by a qualified,
independent appraiser; and
(10) At all times throughout the duration of the Lease, the fair
market value of the Property represents no more than 25 percent of the
total assets of the Plan.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. The Plan is a defined contribution plan sponsored by the
Employer. The
[[Page 29457]]
Employer, a Montana corporation, is engaged in the collection and
credit reporting business. As of October 13, 1997, the Plan had
approximately 26 participants and beneficiaries. As of that date, the
Plan had total assets of $1,131,567. The trustees of the Plan are
Jeffrey J. Koch and Douglas N. Klein.
2. Among the assets of the Plan is the Property, which consists of
a single family residence located at 218 East Spruce, Missoula,
Montana, adjacent to the Employer's premises. The Property is a one
story, two bedroom, one bath structure. The Property was acquired by
the Plan in 1982 from an unrelated party for $32,500 and is not
mortgaged or otherwise subject to any debt. Since September 16, 1996,
the Property has been leased to an unrelated party at the rate of $550
per month.21 The Employer proposes to lease the Property
from the Plan and convert the Property to commercial office space, at
the Employer's own expense (at an estimated cost of approximately
$1,000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ From October 1, 1994 to September 16, 1996, the Plan leased
the Property to the Employer for commercial use. In an audit of the
Plan, the Department cited the prohibited lease, among other things,
in a letter dated December 17, 1996, as a violation of the Act. In a
letter dated February 26, 1997, the Department noted that the
Employer had taken all corrective action required by the Department,
including the payment, on January 24, 1997, of $2,585.50 in excise
taxes assessed by the Internal Revenue Service. Since that amount
exceeded the amount of the section 502(l) penalty assessed by the
Department, under the Department's regulations (see 29 CFR 2570.86),
no further payment was due, and the Department closed its
investigation of the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The Property was appraised in May, 1997, by Pamela A. Lundt and
Lonnie S. Warner of Professional Property Management, Inc. (PPMI). Ms.
Lundt and Ms. Warner (the Appraisers), the partners of PPMI, are both
real estate brokers licensed in the State of Montana. The applicant
represents that both of the Appraisers are highly experienced in
conducting comparative rental market analysis for residential and
commercial properties in Missoula, Montana and the surrounding area. In
addition, PPMI currently manages in excess of 700 residential and
commercial properties in Missoula and the surrounding area.
The Appraisers' valuation of the Property included an analysis of
four other leases of comparable properties in the local market area.
Based upon this market data, the Appraisers concluded that the Property
had a fair market rental value in the range of $575 to $600 per month,
if leased on a triple net basis, as of May 9, 1997.
4. PPMI has also been retained by the Employer to represent the
Plan as an independent fiduciary for the Plan (i.e., the I/F). PPMI
represents that it is unrelated to, and independent of, the Employer
and derives less than 1% of its annual income from the Employer. PPMI
states that it is knowledgeable as to the subject transactions. PPMI
also acknowledges and accepts its duties, responsibilities, and
liabilities in acting as a fiduciary under the Act with respect to the
Plan for purposes of the Lease.22
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ In this regard, PPMI will confer with legal counsel having
expertise with respect to the requirements of the Act, as needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. The Lease provides for a rental rate of $600 per month and an
initial term of one year, which may be renewed for additional one year
periods, up to a maximum total of 15 years, upon the express approval
of PPMI, as the I/F for the Plan. The Lease provides for rent
adjustments, at a minimum, every three years, based upon an updated
independent appraisal of the fair market rental value of the Property.
However, in no event shall such adjustments result in the rent being
less than the rental amount for the Property existing for the period
preceding the adjustment.
The Lease is triple net (with all expenses for maintenance, taxes,
and insurance to be borne by the Employer as the tenant). The Lease
permits the Employer to make improvements to the Property at the
Employer's expense, upon the express approval by the I/F. Any such
improvements to the Property will belong to the Plan upon termination
of the Lease. The Employer will indemnify and hold the Plan harmless
for all claims and demands arising from or in any way relating to the
Property.
6. The Lease grants the Employer the option to purchase the
Property from the Plan, subject to approval by PPMI. In this regard,
PPMI, as the I/F for the Plan, must determine that a sale of the
Property would be in the best interests of the Plan. Any such sale
would be a one-time transaction for cash, and the Plan would incur no
expenses relating to the sale.
If the Employer exercises its option, the Employer will purchase
the Property from the Plan for an amount which is the greater of either
(a) the original acquisition cost of the Property, plus holding
expenses, or (b) the fair market value of the Property as of the date
of the sale, as established by a qualified, independent appraiser. The
appraiser must take into account any possible special value that the
Property may have to the Employer, as a result of the Employer's
premises being located adjacent to the Property.
7. PPMI, acting as the I/F for the Plan, represents that it has
reviewed the terms and conditions of the Lease on behalf of the Plan
and determined that such terms and conditions are at least as favorable
to the Plan as those the Plan could obtain in a comparable arm's length
transaction with an unrelated party. PPMI represents that the Lease
would be in the best interests of, and appropriate for, the Plan. PPMI
states that the Lease will generate income for the Plan, and the
Employer will be a stable, long-term tenant. In this regard, PPMI
states that the Employer is capable of meeting its contractual
obligations under the Lease, based upon an examination of the
Employer's financial condition. Finally, PPMI will monitor and enforce
compliance with the terms and conditions of the Lease, and of the
exemption (if granted), throughout the duration of the Lease.
8. In summary, the applicant represents that the proposed
transactions satisfy the statutory criteria for an exemption under
section 408(a) of the Act for the following reasons: (1) the Plan will
be represented for all purposes under the Lease by PPMI, a qualified,
independent fiduciary; (2) the terms and conditions of the Lease will
be at least as favorable to the Plan as those the Plan could obtain in
a comparable arm's length transaction with an unrelated party; (3) the
rent charged by the Plan under the Lease will be no less than the fair
market rental value of the Property, as established by a qualified,
independent appraiser; (4) the rent will be adjusted, at a minimum,
every three years, based upon an updated independent appraisal of the
Property, but in no event shall such adjustments result in the rent
being less than the rental amount for the Property existing for the
preceding period; (5) the Lease will be triple net (with all expenses
for maintenance, taxes, and insurance to be borne by the Employer as
the tenant); (6) PPMI, as the I/F for the Plan has reviewed the terms
and conditions of the Lease on behalf of the Plan and determined the
Lease would be in the best interests of, and appropriate for, the Plan;
(7) PPMI will monitor and enforce compliance with the terms and
conditions of the Lease, and of the exemption (if granted), throughout
the duration of the Lease; (8) PPMI will expressly approve any
improvements by the Employer to the Property, any renewal of the Lease
beyond the initial term, and any sale of the Property to the Employer,
pursuant to the Employer's option to purchase the Property under the
Lease; (9) in the event that the Employer exercises its option to
[[Page 29458]]
purchase the Property under the Lease, the Employer will pay the Plan
an amount which is the greater of either (a) the original acquisition
cost of the Property, plus holding expenses, or (b) the fair market
value of the Property, as of the date of the sale, as established by a
qualified, independent appraiser; and (10) at all times throughout the
duration of the Lease, the fair market value of the Property will
represent no more than 25 percent of the total assets of the Plan.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemption shall be given to all interested
persons by first-class mail or by posting the required information at
the Employer's offices within 10 days of the date of publication of the
notice of pendency in the Federal Register. Such notice shall include a
copy of the notice of proposed exemption as published in the Federal
Register and shall inform interested persons of their right to comment
and/or request a hearing with respect to the proposed exemption.
Comments and requests for a hearing are due within 40 days of the date
of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karin Weng of the Department,
telephone (202) 219-8881. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Breland Investments, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (the Plan),
Located in Phoenix, Arizona
[Exemption Application No: D-10529]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering granting an exemption under the
authority of section 4975(c)(2) of the Code and in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836,
August 10, 1990). If the exemption is granted, the sanctions resulting
from the application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code, shall not apply to (1) the
proposed loan (the Loan) by the individually directed account (the
Account in the Plan \23\ of Dr. Albert E. Breland (Dr. Breland), to
Mesa Scholastic Enterprises (Mesa), a disqualified person with respect
to the Plan, and (2) the personal guarantee of the Loan by Dr. Breland,
a disqualified person with respect to the Plan, provided the following
conditions are satisfied:
(a) The terms of the Loan are at least as favorable to the Account
as those obtainable in an arm's length transaction with an unrelated
party;
(b) The amount of the Loan does not exceed 25% of the assets in the
Account;
(c) The Loan is secured by a first deed of trust on the commercial
real property (the Property), which has been appraised by a qualified
independent appraiser to have a fair market value not less than 150% of
the outstanding balance of the Loan throughout its duration;
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. The Plan is a profit sharing plan which provides its
participants with the opportunity to direct the investment of their
individual accounts. Currently it has one participant, Dr. Breland, and
one beneficiary, Mrs. Nancy V. Breland (Mrs. Breland), Dr. Breland's
wife. The aggregate fair market value of the Plan's, and the Account's,
assets as of June 30, 1997 was approximately $900,000. The Plan is
sponsored by Breland Investments, Inc., a corporation wholly owned by
Dr. and Mrs. Breland which manages various investments in real estate,
securities and other assets. The trustees of the Plan are Dr. and Mrs.
Breland.
2. Mesa is an Arizona General Partnership in which Dr. and Mrs.
Breland own a majority interest. Located in Mesa, Arizona, it is
engaged in leasing the Property to the Mesa Montessori Preschool. In
the past three years, Mesa has averaged annual revenues of
approximately $48,300, consisting primarily of the $4,000 per month
received in rent from the Mesa Montessori Preschool.
3. The Loan involves only the Account and is described by the
applicant as follows: An amount of $123,500 will be loaned by the
Account to Mesa for purposes of paying a balloon payment due on a prior
third-party loan related to the Property. The Loan will be repaid over
a 10 year period, with equal payments of principal and interest. The
interest rate will be 10% per annum, which was determined after
contacting three prominent commercial banks in the Phoenix metropolitan
area to survey the applicable interest rates for a similar transaction
between unrelated parties. The Loan will be secured by a first deed of
trust on the Property.\24\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Institution Rate Contact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harris Trust Bank of Arizona............ 3% over 10 year Treasury Bill Glenn Elstoen.
rate, plus an initial charge
of 2 points.
Northern Trust.......................... 8.5 to 9%, plus an initial Harold Dorenbecher.
charge of \1/2\ to 1 point.
Wells Fargo............................. 8.475, plus an initial charge Roy Miller.
of 1\1/2\ points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding Mesa's creditworthiness, the applicant represents that
all payments on past and present debt obligations have been paid in a
timely manner. In addition, because the monthly payments on the
proposed Loan will be less than those due under the current loan
related to the Property, and because two additional loans for which
Mesa pays approximately $1,095 per month will be paid off by September
1998, the applicant believes that Mesa will have ample income to ensure
payment of the proposed Loan. Finally, the Brelands, in their
individual capacity, will be responsible for repayment of the Loan in
the event of default by Mesa because of their status as general
partners in Mesa.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Because Dr. Breland is the only participant in the Plan,
there is no jurisdiction under 29 CFR 2510.3-3(b). However, there is
jurisdiction under Title II of the Act pursuant to section 4975 of
the Code.
\24\ The applicant contacted the Harris Trust Bank of Arizona,
Northern Trust, and Wells Fargo. The rates obtained were based on
the following information: A loan for commercial real property in
the Phoenix metropolitan area in the amount of $120,000 to $130,000
payable over a 10 year term, and secured by the property which has a
fair market value in excess of twice the loan amount. The following
provides the quoted rates:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. The Property consists of a .8469 acre parcel of real property
improved with a 3,243 square foot one-story preschool building located
at 2830 South Carriage Lane in Mesa, Arizona. The parcel was originally
transferred from the Brelands to Mesa in 1983.
5. On May 1, 1997, Mr. Gary E. Ringel (Mr. Ringel) and Mr. Carter
T. Froelich (Mr. Froelich), both employees of U.S.L. Valuation,
appraised the Property. Both Mr. Ringel and Mr. Froelich are State
Certified Real Estate Appraisers in Arizona, and represent that they
have no present or prospective interest in the Property, no personal
interest or bias with respect to the parties involved, and are
otherwise independent. After reviewing and analyzing the data related
to the Property, the appraisers determined that the Property is worth
$406,000, or 3.29 times the amount of the Loan.
In their appraisal, Mr. Ringel and Mr. Froelich relied on both the
sales comparison, or market, approach and
[[Page 29459]]
the income approach in reaching their conclusion as to the value of the
Property. Using the sales comparison approach, the appraisers analyzed
preschool building sales in the Phoenix area and compared those to the
Property with adjustments made for property rights, financing,
conditions of sale, market conditions, location and physical features,
and arrived at a fair market value of $405,000. With respect to the
income approach, Mr. Ringel and Mr. Froelich employed the direct
capitalization method, the preferred technique of preschool investors,
and estimated the value of the subject property to be $407,000. Giving
the two methods equal weight, the appraisers concluded the value of the
Property to be $406,000.
7. In summary, the applicant represents that the proposed
transaction satisfies the criteria of section 4975(c)(2) of the Code
for the following reasons: (a) the terms of the Loan are at least as
favorable to the Account as those obtainable in an arm's length
transaction with an unrelated party; (b) the amount of the Loan does
not exceed 25% of the assets in the Account; and (c) the Loan is
secured by a first deed of trust on the Property, which has been
appraised by a qualified independent appraiser to have a fair market
value not less than 150% of the outstanding balance of the Loan
throughout its duration.
Notice to Interested Persons
Because Dr. Overland is the only participant to be affected by the
proposed transaction, it has been determined that there is no need to
distribute the notice of proposed exemption (the Notice) to interested
persons. Comments and requests for a hearing are due thirty (30) days
after publication of the Notice in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Scott Frazier, telephone
(202) 219-8881. (This is not a toll-free number).
General Information
The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption
under section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code
does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest of disqualified
person from certain other provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including any prohibited transaction provisions to which the exemption
does not apply and the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of
section 404 of the Act, which among other things require a fiduciary to
discharge his duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of the
participants and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion in
accordance with section 404(a)(1)(b) of the act; nor does it affect the
requirement of section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must operate
for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) Before an exemption may be granted under section 408(a) of the
Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, the Department must find
that the exemption is administratively feasible, in the interests of
the plan and of its participants and beneficiaries and protective of
the rights of participants and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemptions, if granted, will be supplemental to,
and not in derogation of, any other provisions of the Act and/or the
Code, including statutory or administrative exemptions and transitional
rules. Furthermore, the fact that a transaction is subject to an
administrative or statutory exemption is not dispositive of whether the
transaction is in fact a prohibited transaction; and
(4) The proposed exemptions, if granted, will be subject to the
express condition that the material facts and representations contained
in each application are true and complete, and that each application
accurately describes all material terms of the transaction which is the
subject of the exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of May, 1998.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits
Administration, Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 98-14196 Filed 5-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P