[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6691-6698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-3316]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 372
[OPPTS-400122; FRL-5760-2]
Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know; Section 313,
Toxic Release Inventory Reporting; Notice of Receipt of Petition
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
[[Page 6692]]
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the receipt of a petition from the
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Defenders of Wildlife,
National Audubon Society and the Humane Society of the United States,
requesting EPA to initiate rulemaking to add Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) Code 45, Transportation by Air, to the list of
facilities required to report releases under section 313 of the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and section
6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (PPA). The petition was
submitted pursuant to section 313(b)(1)(B) of EPCRA and sections 553(e)
and 555(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Also, as part of
this notice, EPA, as requested by the petitioners, is publishing the
petition in its entirety. Finally, EPA is seeking comments from
interested or potentially affected parties concerning issues associated
with adding airports to the list of facilities that must report under
section 313 of EPCRA and section 6607 of the PPA, and the motor vehicle
exemption under 40 CFR 372.38(c).
DATES: Written comments in response to this request for comments must
be received on or before April 13, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Each comment must bear the docket control number ``OPPTS-
400122.'' All comments should be sent in triplicate to: OPPT Document
Control Officer (7407), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Room G-099, East
Tower, Washington, DC 20460.
Comments and data may also be submitted electronically to: oppt.
[email protected]. Follow the instructions under Unit IV. of this
document. No Confidential Business Information (CBI) should be
submitted through e-mail.
All comments which contain information claimed as CBI must be
clearly marked as such. Three sanitized copies of any comments
containing information claimed as CBI must also be submitted and will
be placed in the public record for this action. Persons submitting
information on any portion of which they believe is entitled to
treatment as CBI by EPA must assert a business confidentiality claim in
accordance with 40 CFR 2.203(b) for each such portion. This claim must
be made at the time that the information is submitted to EPA. If a
submitter does not assert a confidentiality claim at the time of
submission, EPA will consider this as a waiver of any confidentiality
claim and the information may be made available to the public by EPA
without further notice to the submitter.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicki Anderson at (202) 260-3544, e-
mail: [email protected]. for specific information
regarding this notice. For further information on EPCRA section 313,
contact the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Hotline,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Stop 5101, 401 M St., SW.,
Washington, DC 20460, Toll-free: 1-800-535-0202, in Virginia and
Alaska: 703-412-9877 or Toll free TDD: 800-553-7672.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On April 16, 1997, the EPA received a petition from the Natural
Resources Defense Council, Defenders of Wildlife, National Audubon
Society, and the Humane Society of the United States, requesting EPA to
initiate rulemaking to add Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
Code 45, Transportation by Air, to the list of facilities required to
report releases under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act and section 6607 of the PPA. The
petitioners also requested that the petition be printed in the Federal
Register. The following is the complete text of the petition:
II. The Petition
April 16, 1997
The Honorable Carol Browner
Administrator
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street SW
Washington, D.C. 20460
Re: Petition to Add Standard Industrial Classification Code 45,
Transportation By Air, to the List of Facilities Required to Report
Releases of Chemicals
Dear Administrator Browner:
Pursuant to section 313(b)(1)(B) of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) 42 U.S.C. Sec. 11023(b)(1)(B),
and sections 553(e) and 555(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act,
5 U.S.C. Secs. 553(e), the undersigned groups hereby petition the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to initiate
rulemaking to add Standard Industrial Code (SIC) 45, Transportation
by Air, which includes airports, airline terminals, and aircraft
maintenance facilities, to the list of facilities required to report
releases of toxic chemicals listed on the Toxic Release Inventory
(TRI). We also request that EPA immediately publish this petition in
the Federal Register.
SIC Code 45 facilities are responsible for the release of
millions of pounds of toxic chemicals into the environment each
year. Nevertheless, EPA eliminated SIC Code 45 from its first
industry expansion rulemaking, despite EPA's own findings that show
SIC Code 45 facilities release more toxic chemicals than do most of
the facilities currently proposed for reporting.
For over three years, EPA analyses have shown that SIC Code 45
facilities should be required to report TRI chemical releases. SIC
Code 45 was a ``Primary Candidate'' for inclusion in EPA's industry
expansion rulemaking based on volume of TRI chemicals
released.1 In fact, SIC Code 45 ranked third among 25 SIC
codes considered for inclusion in the rule. While SIC Code 45
facilities use TRI-listed chemicals for a variety of purposes,
ethylene glycol is the TRI chemical used in the greatest quantities
at these facilities. According to EPA's own estimates, during icing
conditions at the 17 busiest airports in the United States, some 58
million pounds of ethylene glycol are released to the environment
each year.2 Thus, SIC Code 45 facilities clearly warrant
listing.
The undersigned (Natural Resources Defense Council, Defenders of
Wildlife, National Audubon Society, and the Humane Society of the
United States), represent a group of environmental, wildlife, and
humane organizations. The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
is an environmental advocacy organization with over 350,000 members
and contributors nationwide. Since 1970, NRDC's scientists and
attorneys have been key players in virtually every critical
environmental issue. Defenders of Wildlife, representing 200,000
members, is one of the leading national organizations fighting to
preserve America's endangered species and biological diversity.
National Audubon Society, representing 550,000 members works to
conserve and restore natural ecosystems, focusing on birds and other
wildlife for the benefit of humanity and the earth's biological
diversity. The Humane Society of the United States, with 4.4 million
members and constituents, is the largest animal protection
organization in the United States. Collectively, the undersigned
groups represent over 5 million members and constituents.
I. Introduction
The fundamental purposes of EPCRA are to inform citizens of
toxic chemical use in their neighborhoods and to encourage industry
to reduce toxic chemical use. Since its enactment in 1986, EPCRA has
successfully achieved a significant reduction in toxic chemical use.
As Administrator, you have noted, ``the success of the program comes
from the public's and industry's use of this information to motivate
and empower initiatives at all levels; from facility teams, to
community groups, to trade associations, and state and local
government.''3 EPA's failure to include SIC Code 45 in
its facility expansion rule has achieved the opposite result; recent
data demonstrates that ethylene glycol use at SIC Code 45 facilities
is increasing. Because ethylene glycol is cheaper than less toxic
alternatives, EPA's failure to include SIC Code 45 facilities in the
facility expansion rule has eliminated a critical incentive for
these facilities to use less toxic chemicals.
In order to fulfill EPCRA's source reduction and public
information objectives, EPA must act to carry out its original
intention to require SIC Code 45 facilities to
[[Page 6693]]
report TRI releases. As demonstrated below, adding SIC Code 45 to
the list of industries required to report TRI releases achieves
EPCRA's statutory purposes and satisfies EPA's decisional criteria
for adding facilities under EPCRA.
II. SIC Code 45 Meets EPA's Criteria for Addition to the List of
Facilities Required to Report TRI Releases
Under EPCRA section 313(b)(1)(B), EPA may add industry groups to
the list of facilities required to report TRI releases where EPA
determines that adding an industry to the list furthers the purposes
of EPCRA.4 EPA established three criteria or factors for
adding facilities under EPCRA section 313(b)(1)(B) in its first
facility expansion rulemaking: (1) the ``chemical'' factor; (2) the
``activity'' factor ; (3) the ``information'' factor. SIC Code 45
facilities satisfy each of these criteria and therefore should be
required to report TRI releases.
A. The Chemical Factor
In addressing whether the chemical factor is met, EPA considers
evidence that facilities within an industry group are reasonably
anticipated to use one or more EPCRA 313 listed chemicals as part of
its routine operations.5 There can be little question
that substantial amounts of TRI chemicals are present at SIC Code 45
facilities. In its industry profile, EPA determined that toxic
chemicals used by SIC Code 45 facilities include ethylene glycol,
trichloroethylene, methylene chloride, acetone, chloroform, methyl
ethyl ketone, isopropyl alcohol, glycol ethers, toluene, xylene, and
other petroleum distillates.6
1. Ethylene Glycol is Toxic to Humans and Wildlife
The quantities of ethylene glycol used at SIC Code 45 facilities
pose significant risks to humans, companion animals, and wildlife.
Requiring airports to report ethylene glycol releases will encourage
more extensive use of less toxic alternatives and will therefore
reduce human and wildlife exposure to a toxic substance.
The acute oral toxicity of ethylene glycol in humans is well
documented. Initially, ethylene glycol causes impairment of the
nervous system, followed by cardiopulmonary toxicity and severe
metabolic acidosis (i.e., the blood becomes unacceptably acidic).
Kidney failure, major neurological disruption, and death can
follow.7 The lethal dose of ingested ethylene glycol in
humans is approximately 1.57g/kg body weight.8 For a 155
pound person, this dose is approximately equal to three ounces. In
1994, 4,792 cases of ethylene glycol ingestion were reported to
poison control centers throughout the United States.9 Of
these exposures, 106 cases were life-threatening or resulted in
significant residual disability, and 34 cases resulted in
death.10
Chronic effects from ethylene glycol ingestion include
reproductive, developmental, and renal effects. Ethylene glycol was
found to cause birth defects in mice.11 EPA has
recognized the heightened chronic toxicity of ethylene glycol by
establishing Reference Doses (RfDs)12 and long-term
Drinking Water Health Advisories. The RfD of ethylene glycol is 2.0
mg/kg/day.13 The Drinking Water Health Advisory for
ethylene glycol is 5.5 mg/L for children and 19.25 mg/L for
adults.14 The FDA has stated that drugs containing
ethylene glycol are considered dangerous to health and are
misbranded15 and that ``under no circumstances [is
ethylene glycol] to be used in any product, whether food, drug, or
cosmetic that is likely to be taken internally or otherwise absorbed
by external application.''16
Ethylene glycol has also been shown to be toxic by
inhalation. Inhalation, of course, is the likely exposure pathway
for airport users such as passenger and flight crew as well as
airport ground crews. Exposure to as little as 3 to 67 mg/m3
of ethylene glycol for a thirty-day period caused throat irritation
and headaches in humans.17 Levels above 140 mg/m3
caused pronounced respiratory irritation, and subjects could not
tolerate levels of 200 mg/m3.18 In animals
ethylene glycol has been shown to cause irritation of the eyes and
respiratory tract, as well as the intestine and lymph nodes.
Further, inhalation of ethylene glycol has been shown to cause birth
defects in laboratory experiments.19
Ethylene glycol is also extremely toxic to animals.
Moreover, since it has a sweet taste, it is attractive to both wild
animals and companion animals, thus increasing the likelihood of
ingestion. A recent study of small practice veterinarians throughout
the United States found that more than 90,000 dogs and cats die each
year from ingesting ethylene glycol antifreeze.20 Another
study estimated that almost 30 percent of all documented dog and cat
poisonings were due to ethylene glycol.21 Endangered
species have also been poisoned. In 1992, a California Condor drank
antifreeze and died.22 Migratory birds and large, as well
as small animals have succumbed. In 1989, the remains of a polar
bear were found on an Alaskan island; ethylene glycol was present in
the soil under the carcass. The polar bear apparently ingested an
ethylene glycol mixture that was used to mark the centerline of
roads and runways covered with snow and ice.23
2. Health Effects of Other Toxic Substances Used at Many
Airports
While ethylene glycol appears to be the most prevalent toxic
substance used at airports, maintenance facilities at many airports
apply chemicals including trichloroethylene, toluene, methylene
chloride, chloroform and glycol ethers, which can have serious human
health implications. For example, breathing large amounts of
methylene chloride for even short periods adversely affects the
human nervous system and the heart, and repeated exposure to
methylene chloride causes kidney and liver damage and cancer in
laboratory tests--repeat exposure may likewise cause cancer in
humans.24 Very high levels of chloroform may result in
unconsciousness and death, and in moderate amounts chloroform
affected reproduction in animal studies. In addition, the Department
of Health and Human Services has determined that chloroform may
reasonably be anticipated to be a carcinogen.25 Low-to-
moderate levels of toluene from long-term exposure can cause memory
loss, nausea, loss of appetite, and hearing loss. Toluene also
affects the kidneys. Repeated exposure to high levels of toluene can
cause permanent brain and speech damage, vision and hearing
problems, memory loss and decreased mental ability.26
3. Significant Human and Wildlife Exposure Results From
Deicing Operations
Release of very large volumes of ethylene glycol during deicing
and anti-icing operations create the potential for human exposures
that may have significant health consequences for airline
passengers, employees, and other service personnel.27 For
example, ethylene glycol has been measured during deicing operations
at levels up to 18 mg/L in ambient air.28 One study
showed that an airline deicing employee could be exposed to 104 mg/
m3 of ethylene glycol through a saturated mask,29
which would exceed the concentration of 100 mg/m330 in
the current ACGIH TLV if the employee sprayed for eight hours.
Ethylene glycol has also been measured inside aircraft during
deicing operations at levels close to 2 mg/L.31
A recent survey found that 45 of the 50 busiest airports
in the United States were located within three miles of an ocean,
bay, lake, reservoir, river, wetland or stream.32
Ethylene glycol has the potential to enter drinking water supplies
through discharges to surface waters or releases to ground water.
Moreover, unless the ethylene glycol fluid is captured for
recycling, which does not appear to be a common airport practice in
the United States,33 the fluid may puddle on-site,
infiltrate soil, flow into creeks, streams, or rivers, or be
retained in on-site retention basins. Wildlife forage in these
environs. Migratory birds are particularly attracted to pooled
water. SIC Code 45 facilities may be located adjacent to or in the
vicinity of wildlife refuges. For example, John F. Kennedy
International Airport in New York borders on the Jamaica Bay
National Wildlife Refuge--a critical habitat for many species of
migratory birds, waterfowl, and wildlife. Denver's airport is near
the Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge.
Ethylene glycol has been measured in stormwater following
deicing operations in concentrations as high as 19,800 mg/L,34
and up to 13,200 mg/L in receiving waters.35 Ethylene
glycol in stormwater runoff at Salt Lake City International Airport
was measured at 19,000 mg/L.36 Levels of ethylene glycol
at Denver's Stapleton Airport ranged from zero to 5,050 mg/L, with
some later concentrations exceeding 100,000 mg/L.37 These
levels far exceed the EPA's one-day federal drinking water health
advisory for ethylene glycol of 18.86 mg/L for children.
Because most ethylene glycol releases at airports occur during
cold weather, significant concentrations of ethylene glycol will be
present downstream from airports. Glycols do not rapidly biodegrade
at low temperatures.38 Since biodegradation of ethylene
glycol occurs slowly at low temperatures, ethylene glycol travels
farther down river ecosystems or through the soil before any
biodegradation occurs. Further, biodegradation of ethylene glycol in
ground water proceeds at a slower rate than in surface water because
of the limited microbial populations and less available
[[Page 6694]]
oxygen in groundwater. Thus, there is a greater potential that
humans and wildlife will be exposed to a toxic chemical.
In addition, both ethylene glycol and a less toxic alternative,
propylene glycol, exert a strong biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) on
receiving waters. This contributes to eutrophication (oxygen
depletion), nuisance algal blooms, and fishery impacts.
Ethylene glycol releases are by no means the only threat to
surface and groundwater that result from operations at SIC Code 45
facilities. Leaking underground storage tanks and pipes are a
significant problem. For example, John F. Kennedy International,
Dallas-Fort Worth, Atlanta, Los Angeles International, San
Francisco, Cleveland, and Miami airports have all reported leaking
underground tanks.39 At John F. Kennedy International
there are two underground plumes of aviation fuel beneath the
airport, estimated to contain 3-5 million gallons of jet fuel, that
resulted from leaking underground pipes.40
B. The Activity Factor
Under the activity factor EPA considers evidence that facilities
within an industry group manufacture, process, or otherwise use one
or more TRI chemicals.41 EPA has determined that
facilities in SIC Code 45 may process or otherwise use TRI
chemicals, especially ethylene glycol, when conducting aircraft and
ground surface deicing or anti-icing operations and maintaining,
repairing, and cleaning aircraft.42
During icing conditions, SIC Code 45 facilities apply
ethylene glycol to aircraft using hand-held applicators that contain
a volume of fluid in a canister connected to a hose and spray
nozzle. In most cases, aircraft deicing is conducted at the terminal
gate just prior to take-off. At some facilities, aircraft deicing is
conducted away from the gate. Sometimes, if an aircraft is held too
long at or away from the gate, more than one application of ethylene
glycol will be required. Ethylene glycol use at SIC Code 45
facilities is probably unique among TRI chemical use in that its use
requires ethylene glycol to be deliberately sprayed into the
environment.
EPA determined that ethylene glycol was the chemical used in the
largest quantities by SIC Code 45 facilities. During winter months
when icy conditions exist, airports and airlines use deicing and
anti-icing fluids to ensure passenger safety. If an airplane is
covered with ice or snow, thousands of gallons of deicing solution
may be necessary to deice just one aircraft. Salt Lake City Airport
has reported using 175 to 600 gallons (1,300 to 4,460 pounds) per
aircraft.43 Depending on weather conditions, Detroit
Metropolitan Airport reported that deicing may require 1,000 to
3,000 gallons (7,400 to 22,300 pounds) of deicing fluid for a
commercial plane the size of a DC-8.44 In a ``worst-
case'' situation, as much as 4,000 gallons of a 50-50 mixture of
glycol and water has been used at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on a
large airplane when it was coated with one-half inch of ice.45
Up to 1,000 gallons (7,400 pounds) has often been used to deice a
single aircraft under severe weather conditions at Stapleton
International Airport in Denver.46
Per day and over a full season, airports use ethylene
glycol in staggering amounts. Based on information filed with its
NPDES permit, Chicago O'Hare International Airport reported that
from July 1975 to June 1981, its average annual use of ethylene
glycol deicing fluid was 348,500 gallons (almost 2.9 million
pounds).47 Assuming a 90 day de-icing season (undoubtedly
longer than reality), this amounts to an average of over 3,800
gallons (36,000 pounds) per day. Similarly, a study at Baltimore
Washington International Airport (BWI) estimated between 250,000 and
280,000 gallons (approximately 1,489,600 pounds) of ethylene glycol
are used per year.48 EPA reports that the 41st busiest
airport in the United States (based on numbers of departures),
Standiford Field in Louisville, Kentucky, used an average of 33,000
pounds of ethylene glycol per day in connection with its deicing
operations in December 1991 and January and February 1992.49
EPA also reports, based on a survey conducted by the Airports
Council International (ACI), that annual ethylene glycol use at 35
SIC Code 45 facilities ranged from 1,500 to 4,491,400 gallons
undiluted (13,965 to 41,814,934 pounds).50
The vast majority of the ethylene glycol used is released
directly into the environment as airport and runway runoff.
Consistent with these reported volumes of ethylene glycol used for
deicing operations, EPA's industry profile for SIC Code 45 estimated
that 58 million pounds of ethylene glycol would be released annually
during icing conditions at the 17 busiest airports in the United
States. If these facilities had been required to report ethylene
glycol releases in 1993, ethylene glycol would have ranked
approximately 12th out of the 316 TRI chemicals reporting TRI
release in 1993--outranking total reported releases of such TRI
chemicals as sulfuric acid, manganese compounds, and
trichloroethylene.51 If required to report, SIC Code 45
facilities would have ranked 9th in total volume of releases among
20 industries reporting under TRI.52
Ethylene glycol releases from airports are already
required to be reported in Canada and to some State agencies in the
U.S. Experience under the Canadian National Pollutant Release
Inventory (NPRI) generally confirms U.S. projections. The NPRI
indicates that over one-half of the facilities with the largest
releases of ethylene glycol were airports or aviation service
companies.53 In 1993, ethylene glycol ranked ninth in
volume of total releases among all reported chemicals in
Canada.54 Moreover, of the top 10 facilities reporting
ethylene glycol in 1993, six were airports, airbases, or aviation
service facilities. Ethylene glycol releases for these facilities
alone combined totaled 1,326 tons (2,652,000 pounds).55
Similarly, SIC Code 45 facilities in Minnesota and Massachusetts
report ethylene glycol use to state agencies.56 In
Minnesota, four facilities reported ethylene glycol use from 80,000
to 2.2 million pounds in 1993. In Massachusetts, one airline
reported using 276,000 pounds or gallons (the report did not specify
a unit) of ethylene glycol.57
In addition to ethylene glycol releases from aircraft
deicing, SIC Code 45 facilities use ethylene glycol to maintain
traction on runways during icy conditions. EPA reported, based on
the ACI survey, that 4,000 to 36,000 gallons (37,240 to 335,160
pounds) of ethylene glycol was used by one airport to deice airfield
surfaces each year.58 At Chicago O'Hare International
Airport 6.8 million pounds of a 60 percent ethylene glycol solution
was applied to runways during the period July 1975 to June
1981.59
Ethylene glycol is also a common base for automotive
antifreeze. Airport ground service equipment and rental car parking
lots may also release ethylene glycol.
Other airport operations use other toxic chemicals (see footnote
6). As EPA noted, cleaning is an essential process in the
maintenance and repair of commercial aircraft.60 Cleaning
removes contaminants and prepares parts for subsequent inspection,
repair, bonding, coating, and testing. Aircraft metals and
electronics are the primary focus of cleaning activities. Metal
cleaning removes oil, grease, and other contaminants from metal
parts, while electronics cleaning removes of flux residues that
remain after soldering operations and conducted. In both cases, SIC
Code 45 facilities use TRI listed solvents in cleaning operations.
C. The Information Factor
Under the information factor, EPA considers evidence regarding
whether requiring a candidate industry group to report is reasonably
anticipated to increase the information made available pursuant to
EPCRA section 313 or otherwise further the purposes of EPCRA section
313. In making this determination EPA considers evidence related to
one or more of the following: whether a significant portion of
facilities within the candidate industry group (1) are likely to
exceed the 313 reporting thresholds, (2) are likely to be subject to
an existing statutory or regulatory exemption, (3) are likely to
contain release and waste management data, or (4) whether a
significant portion of the facilities within the industry group are
expected to file a TRI certification statement.61
1. Requiring SIC Code 45 Facilities to Report Will Increase
the Information Made Available Pursuant to EPCRA section 313
EPA estimates that if SIC Code 45 facilities were required to
report TRI releases, 824 facilities would submit 984 reports.62
EPA further estimates that 748 of these reports would be submitted
based on ethylene glycol use in connection with deicing
operations.63 Given EPA estimates that ethylene glycol
use may exceed 58 million pounds per year, requiring SIC Code 45
facilities to report ethylene glycol releases unquestionably
increases the amount of information made available to the public
pursuant to EPCRA section 313.
The public has no other means by which to learn that huge
quantities of toxic ethylene glycol are being released in their
communities. While section 103(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C.Sec.
9603(a); requires any person in charge of a facility from which
CERCLA hazardous substances has been released in a quantity that
exceeds its reportable quantity (RQ) within a 24 hour period to
immediately
[[Page 6695]]
notify the National Response Center, few SIC Code 45 facilities have
complied with CERCLA's requirements. For those that do, reports are
not easily accessed by the pubic.
The Air Transport Association (ATA) reported to its members and
to the Federal aviation Administration that CERCLA section 103
reporting was not triggered by ethylene glycol use, because
``ethylene glycol is typically discharged via storm sewers to a
NPDES permitted outfall.''64 While it is true that CERCLA
section 103(a) reporting contains an exemption for federally
permitted releases, the ATA's analysis is nevertheless incorrect. To
be exempt from CERCLA release reporting, ethylene glycol must be in
stormwater discharged through an outfall and must either (1) comply
with the effluent limits prescribed in the permit, or (2) be treated
in an on-site treatment system as prescribed in the permit, or (3)
be a continuous or anticipated intermittent discharge that is
conveyed to a point source as provided in the permit or permit
application.65 Presently, not all SIC Code 45 facilities
have NPDES permits that provide for the management or treatment of
ethylene glycol. For those that do, the permit may not yet include
effluent limitations for ethylene glycol.66
Moreover, EPA's current permitting approach to airports,
the industrial storm water NPDES program, is not structured to yield
either consistent use and release data, or consistent pollution
prevention technology implementation. TRI does not have similar
exemptions and is therefore the most complete and accessible source
of information for the public on toxic chemical releases. EPA's
failure to require SIC Code 45 facilities to report toxic chemical
use negates TRI's public informational purpose.
The EPA has stated that TRI reporting not only increases the
public's knowledge of pollutants released to the environment, but
also improves public understanding of the health and environmental
risks of toxic chemicals, allows the public to make informed
decisions on where to work and live, enhances the ability of
corporate lenders and purchasers to more accurately gauge a
facility's potential liability, and assists federal, state, and
local authorities in making better decisions on acceptable levels of
toxics in communities.67 This is particularly important
where there exist acceptable alternatives as in the case of ethylene
glycol deicing. In light of this public informational purpose, EPA
should be more inclusive, rather than less, when considering
potential benefits of TRI reporting for particular industrial
sectors. Including SIC Code 45 facilities would serve this public
purpose by encouraging dissemination of information about releases
of toxic substances such as ethylene glycol.
2. Requiring SIC Code 45 Facilities to Report Furthers the Purposes
of EPCRA
When it appeared that EPA would require the reporting of
ethylene glycol, SIC Code 45 facilities significantly reduced their
use of ethylene glycol deicing fluids. Before ethylene glycol was
considered for placement on the TRI, it was the leading constituent
of deicing fluid. With the TRI listing, however, some product
substitution with less toxic alternatives occurred, although
alternative deicing fluids cost somewhat more than ethylene glycol.
As President Clinton recently stated, EPCRA is intended to ``provide
a strong incentive for businesses to find their own ways of
preventing pollution.''68 However this promising trend
has been reversed due to the exception of SIC code 45
facilities.69
Using available alternatives to ethylene glycol avoids
releases of TRI-listed toxic chemical without compromising aviation
safety and passenger protection. In addition, because less toxic
propylene glycol-based alternatives have a bitter taste, they are
not attractive to birds and wildlife. (As noted above, ethylene
glycol is sweet tasting and is attractive to birds and wildlife.) It
is important to note that all glycols are toxic to aquatic life, as
they place a high biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) on receiving
waters. Using infra-red heat from aircraft deicing is one promising
technique that offers the possibility of eliminating glycol use
altogether.70 Such less toxic alternatives are
``environmentally preferable'' to ethylene glycol fluids under
criteria set forth in the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (the
PPA).71 Encouraging product substitution achieves the
important goal of source reduction under both TRI and the
PPA.72
By failing to include SIC Code 45 facilities in the
proposed rule, EPA has sent the wrong message. The EPA has begun to
convey the message to stakeholders that it is no longer concerned
about ethylene glycol use at these facilities. Such a message
weakens the incentive for SIC Code 45 facilities to voluntarily
reduce ethylene glycol use. In order to continue decreasing the
amount of ethylene glycol that is released from airport deicing
operations, EPA must require airports to report ethylene glycol
releases on an annual basis.
3. EPA Misapplied the Motor Vehicle Exemption to Exclude SIC Code 45
Facilities From the Industry Expansion Rulemaking
Based on its third place ranking for volume of toxic chemical
releases, SIC Code 45 facilities were retained by EPA as a ``Primary
Candidate'' for inclusion in the proposed rule.73 Yet,
without explanation, the Agency removed SIC Code 45 facilities from
further consideration, asserting that operations at these facilities
fall within the motor vehicle exemption.74 There is no
basis in the administrative record for EPA's application of the
motor vehicle exemption. To the contrary, the record expressly
indicates that the motor vehicle exemption should not apply to SIC
Code 45 facilities because air transportation is the primary
economic function.
By applying the motor vehicle exemption to airport deicing
operations, EPA has misconstrued the purpose of the exemption. In
order to place some limitations on the definition of ``otherwise
use'' under section 313, EPA developed a list of certain exempt uses
of toxic chemicals including the ``use of products containing toxic
chemicals for the purpose of maintaining motor vehicles operated by
the facility.''75 The motor vehicle exemption is not a
statutory exemption under EPCRA.
In the proposed facility expansion rule, EPA explained that
``the use of materials containing listed section 313 chemicals for
the purpose of maintaining motor vehicles is believed by EPA to be
an incidental chemical use relative to the overall function of
facilities currently covered under section 313.76 The
spraying of vast quantities of deicing fluids on aircraft at
airports is neither a maintenance activity nor is it ``incidental''
to the overall function of airports.
The Air Transportation Association of America (ATAA) in comments
submitted to the Agency made clear that ``the use of deicing fluids
is an integral aspect of ensuring aviation safety and a required
component of FAA-approved airline deicing programs prescribed by FAA
regulations.''77 While ATAA argued that the motor
exemption should apply to the use of solvents in aircraft
maintenance operations, ATAA did not describe deicing operations as
part of those maintenance activities.78 We, however, urge
that all activities as SIC Code 45 facilities be listed. Consistent
with ATAA's position, EPA's own economic analysis assumed correctly
that the motor vehicle exemption would not apply to facilities at
which air transportation is the ``primary economic
function.''79 Nevertheless, the Agency eliminated SIC
Code 45 facilities from the proposed rule based on the motor vehicle
exemption, without any supporting reasoning, either in the rule or
in the documents supporting the rule.
IV. Conclusion
The undersigned organizations seek to make EPA aware of the
health and ecological risks associated with ethylene glycol use at
SIC Code 45 facilities and the need to require these facilities to
report their releases under the TRI. By this petition, we request
that EPA immediately initiate and promptly conclude rulemaking to
require SIC Code 45 facilities report their toxic chemical use under
the TRI. We also request that EPA immediately publish this petition
in the Federal Register.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Peter Lehner
Senior Attorney
Natural Resources Defense Council
/s/
Jennifer Stenzel
Research Associate
Natural Resources Defense Council
/s/
James K. Wyerman
Vice President for Program
Defenders of Wildlife
/s/
John D. Echeverria
General Council
National Audubon Society
/s/
Patricia Forkan
Executive Vice President
Humane Society of the United States
/s/
Leslie Sinclair, DVM
Director of Companion Animal Care
Humane Society of the United States
Footnotes
[[Page 6696]]
1Environmental Protection Agency, Development of SIC
Code Candidates: Screening Document (June 1996).
2 Science Applications International Corporation, SIC
Code Profile 45 Transportation By Air (1994).
3 EPA, Report to President Clinton, Expansion of
Community Right-to-Know Reporting to Include Chemical Use Data:
Phase III of the Toxics Release Inventory at 2.
4 61 Fed. Reg. 33588, 33593 (June 27, 1996).
5 Id. at 33594.
6 Science Applications International Corporation, SIC
Code Profile 45: Transportation by Air (1994). See also, EPA,
Economic Analysis of the Proposed Rule to Add Certain Industries to
EPCRA Section 313 (June 1996) at H-2 (facilities under SIC Code 45
are expected to report dicholormethane, ethylene glycol, methyl
ethyl ketone, sulfuric acid, toluene, 1,1,1-trichloroethene, and
trichloroethylene).
7 Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry,
Ethylene/Propylene Glycol: Case Studies in Environmental Medicine,
US Department of Health and Human Services, prepared by DeLima
Associates, San Rafael, California (Aug. 1992).
8 The estimate was derived from the lowest dose of
ethylene glycol reported to cause death in humans, which was 100 ml
of ethylene glycol. Laug, E.P., H.O. Calvery, H.J. Morris, and G.
Woodard (1939), The toxicology of some glycols and derivatives, 21
J. Ind. Hyd. Toxicol. 173. On a body weight basis, ethylene glycol
is more toxic in humans than animal species. Andrews, L.S. and R.
Snyder (1991), Toxic effects of solvents and vapors, in M.O. Amdur,
J. Doull and C.D. Klaasen, eds. Cassarett and Doull's Toxicology:
The Basic Science of Poisons 4th ed. Pergamon Press, New York.
9 Litovitz, T.L., L. Felberg, et al., 1994 Annual
Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers for
Toxic Exposure Surveillance System, reprinted in 13 Am. J. Emerg.
Med. 551 (1995).
10 In 1991, 19 deaths were reported; in 1992, eight
deaths were reported, and in 1993, 13 deaths were reported.
Litovitz, T.L., L.R. Clark, and R. A. Soloway, 1993 Annual Report of
The American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure
Surveillance System,,[sic] reprinted in 12 Am. J. Emerg. Med. 546
(1994); Litovitz, T.L., K.C. Holm, et al., 1992 Annual Report of the
American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure
Surveillance System, reprinted in 11 Am. J. Emerg. Med. 494 (1993);
Litovitz, T.L., K.C. Holm, et. al., 1991 Annual Report of the
American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure
Surveillance System, reprinted in 10 Am. J. Emerg. Med. 452 (1992).
11 Ethylene Glycol was found to cause birth defects
at doses of 1640 mg/kg/day. Lamb, J.C., R.R. Maronpot, D.K. Gulati,
V.S. Russell, L. Hommel-Barnes, P.S. Sabharwal, Reproductive and
developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol in the mouse, 81 Toxicol.
Appl. Pharmcol. 110-112 (1985).
12 An RfD is an estimate of the maximum lifetime
daily dose of a substance that will not cause noncarcinogenic
effects over a lifetime of ingestion.
13 The RfD is based on an oral feeding study in rats.
See Depass, L.R., R. H. Garman, M.D., Woodside, W.E., Giddons, R.R.
Maronpot, and C.S. Weil, Chronic toxicity and oncogenicity of
ethylene glycol in rats and mice, 7 Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 547 (1986).
14 Ethylene Glycol Health Advisory, US Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Drinking Water (Mar. 31, 1987).
15 FDA correspondence with industry, TC-389, Aug. 6,
194, reprinted in Kleinfeld, V.A. and C.W. Dunn, Federal Food Drug
and Cosmetic Act Judicial Administrative Record, 1938-1949, Food and
Drug Law Institute, Commerce Clearing House, Chicago (1978) (FDA
Trade Correspondence were pre-1946, informal opinions of the FDA
based on replies to day-to-day inquiries; since 1946, the FDA has
published Statements of General Policy or Interpretation in the
Federal Register).
16 FDA Correspondence with industry, TC-402, May 14,
1943, reprinted in Kleinfeld, V.A. and C.W. Dunn, Federal food [sic]
Drug and Cosmetic Act Judicial Administrative Record, 1936-1949,
Food and Drug Law Institute, Commerce Clearing House Chicago (1978).
Ethylene Glycol has limited approval as an indirect food additive.
It may only be used as a component of food packaging adhesives.
[sic] 21 C.F.R. Sec. 175.105 (1995) and in the manufacture of
various coatings and components of food contact surfaces. 21 C.F.R.
Sec. 175.390, 175.300, 175.320, 175.1200, 177.1630, 177.1680,
177.2420, 176.2105 and 176.300 (1995).
17 Wills, J.H., E.S. Coulston, E.S. Harris, E.W.
McChesney, J.C. Russell, and D.M. Serronne, Inhalation of
aerosolized ethylene glycol in man, 7 Clin. Toxicol. 463 (1974).
18 Id.
19 Tyl, R.W., B. Ballantyne, et al., Evaluation of
the developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol aerosol in CD-1 mice
by nose-only exposure. 27 Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 49 (1995).
20 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
Animals and Safe Brands (1996). LD50 values for ethylene
glycol range from 4.0 to 15.4 g/kg for rats, mice, and guinea pigs.
Bornmann, G., Grundwirkungen der Glykile und ihre Bedeutung fur die
Toxizata, 4 Arzenimittelforschung 643 (1954) (mice); Clark, C.R., et
al. Toxicolgical assessment of heath transfer fluids proposed for
use in solar energy applications, 51 Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 529
(1979) (rats); Smyth; H.F., Jr,. Et al., The single dose toxicity of
some glycols and derivatives, 23 J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 259 (1941)
(guinea pigs).
21 Rowland, J., Incidence of ethylene glycol
intoxication in dogs and cats seen at Colorado State University
Veterinary Teaching Hospital, 29 Vet. Hum Toxicol. 41 (1987). The
minimum lethal dose reported for ethylene glycol in rats is 3.8 g/kg
and 7.3 g/kg in dogs. Clark, Marshal et al., supra note 35 (rats);
Sanyer, J.L. et al. Systematic treatment of ethylene glycol
toxicosis in dogs, 34 J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc., 527 (1973), as
cited in National Toxicology Program, NTP Technical Report on the
Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Ethylene Glycol (CAS No.
107-21) in B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies) NIH Publication No. 93-3144,
US Department of Health and Human Services (Feb. 1993).
22 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 17 Endangered
Species Technical Bulletin 2 (1992). See also, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Services, Fact Sheet: California Condor, (Gymnogyps
Californianus) (undated).
23 S. Anstrup, C. Gardner, K. Myers, F. Oehme,
Ethylene Glycol (Antifreeze) Poisoning in a Free-Ranging Polar Bear,
31 Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 317 (1989).
24 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Chemicals in the Environment:
Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane) (CAS No. 75-09-2) (1994).
25 U. S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Fact Sheet on
Chloroform (1993).
26 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Fact Sheet on
Toluene (1995).
27 In 1995, a pilot of a commuter flight was doused
with deicer fluid while boarding the aircraft at Philadelphia
International Airport. The Philadelphia Inquirer (December 21,
1995).
28 Council of Environmentally Sound Deicing, Ethylene
Glycol: The Scientific Basis for Its Retention on EPA's Toxics
Release Inventory (Feb. 1996).
29 Montgomery, J.F., A Discussion of the
Toxicological and Biological Effects of Deicing Fluids, American
Airlines Environmental Department, at 15 (Sept. 28, 1994).
30 American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists, 1995-1996 Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances
and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs),
Cincinnati, Ohio at 21 (1995).
31 Council for Environmentally Sound Deicing,
Ethylene Glycol: The Scientific Basis for its Retention on EPA's
Toxics Release Inventory (Feb. 1996).
32 Natural Resources Defense Council, Flying Off
Course (1996) at 56.
33 Id. at 69.
34 MacDonald, D.D., I.D. Cuthbert, and P.M. Outridge,
Canadian Environmental Quality guidelines for Three Glycols Used in
Aircraft Deicing/Anti-icing Fluids: Ethylene Glycol; Diethylene
Glycol; and Propylene Glycol, EcoHealth Branch, Environment Canada,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, at 15, 76 (Table 10) (Sept. 1992).
35 Ethylene Glycol levels, based on indirect
measurements, reached peak concentrations as high as 59,360 mg/L.
Id. At 15, 78 (Table 12).
36 Sills, R.D., and P.A. Blakeslee, Environmental
Impact of Deicers in Airport Stormwater Runoff at 324 in F.M.
D'Irti, ed., Chemical Deicers in the Environment, Lewis Publishers,
Boca Raton, Fla. (1992).
37 U.S. EPA, Office of Water, Permits Division,
Contractor Report -- Guidance for Issuing NPDES Storm Water Permits
for Airports, at 2-8 (Sept. 28, 1990).
38 Klecka, G.M., C.L. Carpenter, B.D. Landenberger,
Biodegradation of aircraft deicing fluids in soil at low
temperatures, 25 Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 280-285 (1993).
39 NRDC, Flying Off Course (1996) at 57.
40 Id.
41 61 Fed. Reg. at 33594
[[Page 6697]]
42 EPA, Economic Analysis of the Proposed Rule to Add
Certain Industries to EPCRA Section 313 (June 1996) at H-1.
43 ERC Environmental and Energy Services Co., EPA
Contractor Report Guidance for Issuing NPDES Storm Water Permits for
Airports (1990) at 2-4.
44 Id. At 2-5.
45 Id.
46 Id.
47 Id.
48 Science Applications International Corporation,
SIC Code Profile 45: Transportation by Air (1994) at 7.
49 EPA, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances, Expanded Exposure Assessment for Ethylene Glycol In
Response to Delisting Petition (June 16, 1995).
50 EPA, Economic Analysis of the Proposed Rule to Add
Certain Industries to EPCRA Section 313 (June 1996) at H-4.
51 EPA, 1993 Toxics Release Inventory: Public Data
Release (1995) Document No. 745-R-95-010.
52 Id.
53 Twenty-seven airports reported ethylene glycol
releases in 1993 with ethylene glycol releases totaling 2166.7 tons
(4,333,400 pounds). This constituted 57 percent of all reported
ethylene glycol release. Environment Canada Summary Report of the
1993 National Pollutant Release Inventory at 28-29 (undated).
54 Id. At 11.
55 Id.
56 EPA, Economic Analysis of the Proposed Rule to Add
Certain Industries to EPCRA Section 313 (June 1996) at H-13.
57 Id. If the unit reported was gallons, ethylene
glycol releases exceeded 2.3 million pounds.
58 EPA, Economic Analysis of the Proposed Rule to Add
Certain Industries to EPCRA Section 313 (June 1996) at H-5.
59 ERC Environmental and Energy Services Co., EPA
Contractor Report Guidance for Issuing NPDES Storm Water Permits for
Airports (1990) at 2-6.
60 Science Applications International Corporation,
SIC Code Profile 45: Transportation By Air (1994) at 14.
61 61 Fed. Reg. at 33594.
62 EPA, Economic Analysis of the Proposed Rule to Add
Certain Industries to EPCRA Section 313 (June 1996) at H-18.
63 Id.
64 ATA, Summary Report to the Federal Aviation
Administration Regarding Environmental Issues Associated with
Aircraft Deicing and the Use of Glycol-Based Fluids (undated).
65 R. Van Voorhees and Green, C. EPA Clarifies
Reporting Requirements for Ethylene Glycol Releases from Airport De-
Icing Operations, BNA, Analysis Perspective (August 30, 1996).
66 See Buchholz v. Dayton International Airport et
al., (Magistrates Report and Recommendation), Case No. C-3-94-435
(S.D. Ohio, June 26, 1995) (citizen suit filed under the CWA and
RCRA against the airport by residents who use a creek receiving
airport deicing flows for drinking, bathing, washing clothes, and
dishes).
67 60 Fed. Reg. 59664 (Nov. 28 1995).
68 Report to President Clinton, Expansion of
Community Right-to-Know Reporting to Include Chemical Use Data:
Phase III of the Toxics Release Inventory (EPA Report to the
President) at 2 (undated).
69 The trend away from ethylene glycol use, however,
was superseded by an FAA safety rule in the early 1990's that
effectively mandated a doubling in the volume of de-icing products
applied at airports; thus we are still seeing the massive quantities
of ethylene glycol in use that was documented earlier in this
petition.
70 NRDC, Flying Off Course (1996) at 63.
71 42 U.S.C. Secs. 13101-09 (West 1995).
72 Section 6603(5)(A) defines ``source reduction'' as
any practice that reduces the amount of any hazard from any
hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant entering any waste
stream or otherwise released into the environment, including
substitution of raw materials. 42 U.S.C. Sec. 113102(5)(A).
73 EPA Development of SIC Code Candidates: Screening
Document (June 1996) at 13.
74 Id. at 17.
75 53 Fed. Reg. 4506 (Feb. 16, 1988).
76 61 Fed. Reg. 33596 (emphasis added).
77 ATAA Comments on EPA's Consideration of Airports
for Inclusion in the TRI Program, May 25, 1995 (Docket #400104, D3-
0010) at 4.
78 See Id. at 11-12. 79 EPA, Economic Analysis of the
Proposed Rule to Add Certain Industries to EPCRA Section 313 (June
1996) at H-1.
III. Issues
There are two issues that could potentially affect reporting by
airports: (1) Whether airports would be exempt from reporting the
majority of their toxic chemical releases because of the motor vehicle
exemption, and (2) whether airports fit within the definition of
facility under 40 CFR 372.1. In addition, there are issues relating to
the application of the motor vehicle exemption as it pertains to motor
vehicles used in industries recently added to the list of facilities
subject to EPCRA section 313 reporting requirements. In light of these
concerns, EPA is considering a modification in the motor vehicle
exemption. The Agency is interested in receiving comments regarding
these issues and other matters relevant to the petition and its
response from potentially affected or interested parties. The comments
will help EPA better understand relevant issues surrounding the
addition of airports to the list of facilities required to report
pursuant to section 313 of EPCRA, and the motor vehicle exemption in
general.
A. Motor Vehicle Exemption
EPA is seeking comments from potentially affected and interested
parties concerning whether the use of ethylene glycol and other EPCRA
section 313 chemicals at airports would or should be exempt under the
Motor Vehicle Maintenance Exemption, 40 CFR 372.38(c).
In the February 16, 1988 Final Rule implementing the reporting
requirements of EPCRA section 313 (53 FR 4500), EPA limited the
definition of ``otherwise use'' by exempting certain uses of toxic
chemicals. Section 372.38(c) states that if a toxic chemical is used at
a covered facility for a purpose described in paragraph (c), a person
is not required to consider the quantity of the toxic chemical used for
such purpose when determining whether an applicable threshold has been
met under Sec. 372.25 or when determining the amount of releases to be
reported under Sec. 372.30. 40 CFR 372.38(c)(4) further states that
``use of products containing toxic chemicals for the purpose of
maintaining motor vehicles operated by the facility'' are exempted from
reporting under 40 CFR 372.30.
In previous guidance, EPA has stated that airplanes are motor
vehicles and that this exemption applies to fuels and other products
containing toxic chemicals for the purpose of maintaining motor
vehicles (see Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Reporting Package for
1990, January 1991, EPA 560/4-91-001, p. A-5). In keeping with this
guidance, toxic chemicals found in gasoline, diesel fuel, brake and
transmission fluids, oils and lubricants, antifreeze, batteries,
cleaning solutions, and solvents in paints may be excluded from
reporting under Sec. 372.30 as long as a facility uses these products
to maintain its motor vehicles. While motor vehicle maintenance may be
an incidental activity at the facilities originally subject to EPCRA
section 313 reporting requirements (i.e., the manufacturing sector),
EPA believes that this is not the case at airports, where the
maintenance of vehicles is integral to the activities at the airport.
For example, use of ethylene glycol to de-ice planes and runways is
essential for the operation of airplanes when icy conditions and
inclement weather may hinder their safe operation. In such cases, the
use of ethylene glycol is in no way ``incidental'' to the operation of
airports. In addition, EPA believes that maintaining motor vehicles is
integral to activities that occur at some of the industry groups
recently added to the list of facilities subject to reporting under
EPCRA section 313 and PPA section 6607 (see 62 FR 23834, May 1, 1997).
For example, use of earth moving equipment is an integral part of the
mining industry and use of tanker trucks is an integral part of the
operation of bulk petroleum stations.
[[Page 6698]]
EPA, therefore, requests comments on a number of options to modify
or eliminate the motor vehicle exemption at 40 CFR 372.38(c)(4). These
options include:
1. Making no change to the motor vehicle exemption.
2. Not allowing certain industries, such as the transportation
industry, in which motor vehicle use is the industry's main activity,
to take the motor vehicle exemption. The motor vehicle exemption would
continue to apply to other covered industries.
3. For covered industries, narrowing the motor vehicle exemption so
that it would only apply to incidental motor vehicle use. It would not
apply to any activity that is process-related. For example: the motor
vehicle exemption would not apply to toxic chemicals used in jet fuel
while a jet is at an airport, deicing, and other vehicle maintenance
activities. As a second example, for covered industries such as metal
mining and bulk petroleum stations, the motor vehicle exemption would
no longer apply to vehicles used in processing activities (e.g., earth-
moving equipment or trucks and transport vehicles at petroleum
facilities which are maintained on-site), or
4. Eliminating the motor vehicle exemption entirely.
B. Definition of Facility under EPCRA
1. Definition of facility. Under EPCRA section 329(4) and 40 CFR
372.1, a ``facility'' means all buildings, equipment, structures and
other stationery items which are located on a single site or on
contiguous or adjacent sites and which are owned or operated by the
same person (or by any person which controls, is controlled by, or
under common control with such person). A facility may contain more
than one establishment.
2. Application of definition of facility to airports. Airports
typically operate under a single management organization known as the
airport ``authority'' which, in most cases is a public agency. Airline
carriers that have contracts with the airport authority to conduct
business on airport property are commonly known as ``tenants'' of the
airport. In order to comply with various state and Federal
environmental regulations, an airline may require (as part of a lease
agreement) a tenant to report its aggregate releases of toxic or
hazardous chemicals directly to the owners or operators of the airport
authority.
On the other hand, the Agency recognizes that if airports were
required to report under section 313 of EPCRA and section 6607 of the
PPA, there could be unique reporting issues associated with their
ownership, operation, and control. Therefore, the Agency is interested
in receiving comments or information concerning how airports operate
and the practical impacts of requiring airports to report under section
313 of EPCRA and section 6607 of the PPA. Information gathered from
commenters will be used by the agency to determine whether airports
fall within the definition of facility.
IV. Public Record and Electronic Submissions
The official record for this document, as well as the public
version, has been established for this rulemaking under docket control
number ``OPPTS-400122'' (including comments and data submitted
electronically as described below). A public version of this record,
including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does
not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection
from 12 noon to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The official record is located in the TSCA Nonconfidential
Information Center, Rm. NE-B607, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC.
Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
[email protected]
Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the
use of special characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data
will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1/6.1 or ASCII file
format. All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by
the docket control number ``OPPTS-400122.'' Electronic comments on this
document may be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 372
Environmental protection, Community right-to-know, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, and Toxic substances.
Dated: January 29, 1998.
Lynn R. Goldman,
Assistant Administrator for Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.
[FR Doc. 98-3316 Filed 2-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F