[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5513-5515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-2537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-99-000]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare 
an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed DLP Dighton Project and 
Request for Comments on Environmental Issues

January 28, 1998.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or 
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will 
discuss the environmental impacts of the construction and operation of 
the facilities, about 1.5 miles of 12-inch-diameter loop, horsepower 
modifications at two existing compressor stations, a new meter station, 
and appurtenant facilities, proposed in the DLP Dighton Project.\1\

[[Page 5514]]

This EA will be used by the Commission in its decision-making process 
to determine whether the project is in the public convenience and 
necessity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Algonquin Gas Transmission Company's application was filed 
with the Commission under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 
157 of the Commission's regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of the Proposed Project

    Algonquin Gas Transmission Company (Algonquin) proposes to expand 
the capacity of its facilities to transport an additional 33,000 
dekatherms per day of natural gas to the approved Dighton Power 
Associates Limited Partnership (DLP) power plant. Algonquin seeks 
authority to construct and operate:
     1.5 miles of 12-inch-diameter loop in the towns of Norwich 
and Montville, Connecticut;
     Upgrade two compressor units at its Southeast Compressor 
Station from 4,250 horsepower (hp) to 4,700 hp each in Putnam County, 
New York;
     Upgrade two compressor units at its Burrillville 
Compression Station from 5,500 hp to 5,700 hp each in Providence 
County, Rhode Island;
     A new Dighton Meter Station and appurtenances at the 
approved DLP power plant in Dighton, Massachusetts;
     New tap valves on its G-1 Line and G-1 Loop and 40 feet of 
8-inch-diameter connecting pipeline between the new valves and proposed 
Dighton Meter Station; and
     Modifications to its existing Salem Turnpike and Montville 
Meter Stations in Norwich and Montville, Connecticut, respectively.
    DLP is currently constructing a 170 megawatt power plant and 
appurtenances in Dighton. The Dighton Meter Station and appurtenances 
would be constructed within the non jurisdictional power plant site.
    The location of the project facilities is shown in appendix 1.\2\ 
If you are interested in obtaining procedural information, please write 
to the Secretary of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being 
printed in the Federal Register. Copies are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, or call (202) 208-1371. 
Copies of the appendices were sent to all those receiving this 
notice in the mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction of the proposed facilities would require about 14.3 
acres of land (including 5.5 acres of existing pipeline right-of-way). 
Following construction, about 3.4 acres would be maintained as new 
permanent pipeline right-of-way. The remaining 5.4 acres of land would 
be restored and allowed to revert to its former use.

The EA Process

    The national Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the 
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could 
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a 
Certificate of Public Conveniences and Necessity. NEPA also requires us 
to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals. 
We call this ``scoping.'' The main goal of the scoping process is to 
focus the analysis in the EA on the important environmental issues. By 
this Notice of Intent, the Commission requests public comments on the 
scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All comments received 
are considered during the preparation of the EA. State and local 
government representatives are encouraged to notify their constituents 
of this proposed action and encourage them to comment on their areas of 
concern.
    The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the 
construction and operation of the proposed project under these general 
headings:
     Geology and soils.
     Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands.
     Vegetation and wildlife.
     Endangered and threatened species.
     Public safety.
     Land use.
     Cultural resources.
     Air quality and noise.
     Hazardous waste.
    We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project 
or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen 
or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
    Our independent analysis of the issues will be in the EA. Depending 
on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA may be 
published and mailed to Federal, state, and local agencies, public 
interest groups, interested individuals, affected landowners, 
newspapers, libraries, and the Commission's official service list for 
this proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA 
is published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we make 
our recommendations to the Commission.

Currently Identified Environmental Issues

    We have already identified several issues that we think deserve 
attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and 
the environmental information provided by Algonquin. This preliminary 
list of issues may be changed based on your comments and our analysis.
     Potential effect on Trading Cove Brook and Stony Brook 
during crossing by the dry-ditch method.
     The permanent conversion of about 0.25 acre of wooded 
wetland to open wetland.
    Also, we have made a preliminary decision to not address the impact 
of the nonjurisdictional facility. We will briefly describe its 
location and status in the EA.

Public Participation

    You can make a difference by sending a letter addressing your 
specific comments or concerns about the project. You should focus on 
the potential environmental effects of the proposal, alternatives to 
the proposal (including alternative routes), and measures to avoid or 
lessen environmental impact. The more specific your comments, the more 
useful they will be. Please follow the instructions below to ensure 
that your comments are received and properly recorded:
     Send two copies of your letter to: Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., N.E., Room 1A, Washington, 
DC 20426;
     Label one copy of the comments for the attention of the 
Environmental Review and Compliance Branch, PR-11.2;
     Reference Docket No. CP98-99-000; and
     Mail your comments so that they will be received in 
Washington, DC on or before March 2, 1998.
    If you are interested in obtaining procedural information please 
write to the Secretary of the Commission.

Becoming an Intervenor

    In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want 
to become an official party to the proceeding or become an 
``intervenor.'' Among other things, intervenors have the right to 
receive copies of case-related Commission documents and filings by 
other intervenors. Likewise, each intervenor must provide copies of its 
filings to all other parties. If you want to become an intervenor you 
must file a motion to intervene according to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) (see 
appendix 2).
    The date for filing timely motions to intervene in this proceeding 
has passed. Therefore, parties now seeking to file late interventions 
must show good cause, as required by section 385.214(b)(3), why this 
time limitation should be waived. Environmental issues

[[Page 5515]]

have been viewed as good cause for late intervention.
    You do not need intervenor status to have your comments considered.
Lindwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-2537 Filed 2-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M