[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66275-66277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33027]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
29 CFR Part 1910
RIN 1218-AA95
Methylene Chloride; Partial Stay
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
Department of Labor.
ACTION: Final rule; partial stay of start-up dates for compliance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has
received a motion for reconsideration of certain provisions of its
standard regulating occupational exposure to methylene chloride, 62 FR
1494 (Jan. 10, 1997). The motion, filed jointly by the International
Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers
of America, UAW; the Halogenated Solvents Industry Alliance, Inc., and
others, requests, among other things, extensions of the current start-
up dates for installation of engineering controls and use of
respiratory protection for certain employers. It also requests an
interim stay of those compliance dates pending OSHA's ruling on the
motion for reconsideration.
OSHA has preliminarily evaluated the motion for reconsideration
and, based on that evaluation, finds good cause to grant in part the
movants' request for an interim stay of the start-up dates.
Accordingly, for those employers subject to the motion who would
otherwise need to use respiratory protection or install engineering
controls on or before April 10, 1998, OSHA is hereby delaying until
August 31, 1998 the requirement to use respiratory protection to
achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL, and to December 10, 1998 the requirement to
achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL and the STEL through engineering controls.
DATES: The effective date of this partial stay is December 18, 1997.
Under the stay, the start-up date for certain employers to use
respiratory protection to achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL is August 31,
1998, and the start-up date for certain employers to install
engineering controls is December 10, 1998.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bonnie Friedman, Director, OSHA Office of Public Affairs, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N3647, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20210, telephone (202) 219-8151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSHA published a new methylene chloride (MC)
standard on January 10, 1997 (62 FR 1494). The standard establishes an
8-hour time-weighted-average permissible exposure limit (8-hour TWA
PEL) for MC of 25 per million (ppm). It also sets a short term exposure
limit (STEL) of 125 ppm averaged over a 15 minute period. Employers
must achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL and the STEL, to the extent feasible,
by engineering and work practice controls. If such controls are unable
to achieve the exposure limits, and during the time they are being
implemented, employers must use respirators to protect employees
against excessive MC exposure.
The methylene chloride standard establishes different start-up
dates for employers in different size categories. It requires
compliance with the engineering control requirement by April 10, 2000
for employers with fewer than 20 employees; April 10, 1999 for
polyurethane foam manufacturers with 20 to 99 employees; and April 10,
1998 for all other employers. As originally published, compliance with
the requirement for respiratory protection was required by April 10,
1998 for employers with fewer than 20 employees; January 5, 1998 for
polyurethane foam manufacturers with 20 to 99 employees; and October 7,
1997 for all other employers. OSHA subsequently extended certain start-
up dates, including the requirement for all other employers to use
respiratory protection, to December 21, 1997. (62 FR 54382, Oct. 20,
1997).
On November 24, 1997, OSHA received a joint motion for
reconsideration of certain aspects of the standard from the
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural
Implement Workers of America, UAW; the Halogenated Solvents Industry
Alliance, Inc.; Benco Sales, Inc.; Brock Woodcraft; Masters Magic
Products, Inc.; Bassco Foam, Inc; and Tupelo Foam Sales, Inc. Among
other things, the movants ask that the compliance dates for
installation of engineering controls and use of respiratory protection
to achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL be extended for employers who use
methylene chloride in certain specific applications. Those applications
are polyurethane foam
[[Page 66276]]
manufacturing; foam fabrication; furniture refinishing; general
aviation aircraft stripping; formulation of products containing
methylene chloride; boat building and repair; recreational vehicle
manufacture; van conversion; upholstery; and use of methylene chloride
in construction work for restoration and preservation of buildings,
painting and paint removal, cabinet making and/or floor refinishing and
resurfacing.
The motion for reconsideration requests that the standard's current
final engineering control start-up date of April 10, 2000, which is now
limited to employers with fewer than 20 employees, also apply to
employers in the specified application groups with 20-49 employees and
foam fabricators with 20-149 employees. According to the parties,
employers in these size categories, like those with fewer than 20
employees, have limited resources with which to develop and implement
engineering controls and will be able to use those resources more
efficiently if given sufficient time to develop and install effective
controls and to take advantage of compliance assistance that OSHA plans
to offer. The motion requests shorter extensions of the engineering
control dates for larger employers in these application groups. The
parties further request that respirator use to achieve the 8-hour TWA
PEL not be required before the engineering control start-up dates for
the employers covered by the motion. The parties assert that it would
better protect workers to enable these employers to concentrate their
resources on implementation of effective engineering controls rather
than divert part of those resources to interim respiratory protection
that would no longer be needed once full compliance with the 8-hour TWA
PEL and STEL is achieved by engineering controls. Unlike for most
substances, inexpensive respirators do not protect against MC
exposures. Thus, the extensions of start-up dates the parties seek are
designed to allow employers to allocate their resources effectively in
developing permanent engineering solutions that will reduce worker MC
exposures to below the 8-hour TWA PEL and STEL.
OSHA generally agrees that worker protection against MC exposure
will best be achieved if employers develop and install effective
engineering controls as soon as practicable. The agency recognizes that
employers require a reasonable amount of time to develop and install
such controls. OSHA's preliminary evaluation of the motion for
reconsideration indicates that the parties have provided good cause for
the extensions they seek. However, the agency intends to further
evaluate the motion and to ask for public comment on it.
In their motion, the parties ask that OSHA temporarily stay the
start-up dates for which they request extensions until OSHA takes final
action on the motion. OSHA finds good cause to grant in part the
movants' request for an interim stay in order to avoid the need for
employers to meet start-up dates that would no longer apply if the
motion is granted. At present, certain start-up dates that would be
extended if the motion is granted take effect on or before April 10,
1998. These include: December 21, 1997 for employers with 20 or more
employees (except polyurethane foam manufacturers with 20-99 employees)
to use respiratory protection to achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL; January 5,
1998 for polyurethane foam manufacturers with 20-99 employees to use
respiratory protection to achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL; April 10, 1999
for employers with fewer than 20 employees to use respiratory
protection to achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL; and April 10, 1998 for
employers with 20 or more employees (except polyurethane foam
manufacturers with 20-99 employees) to install engineering controls to
achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL and STEL. The only start-up dates scheduled
to take effect on or after April 10, 1998 are: April 10, 1999 for
polyurethane foam manufacturers with 20-99 employees to use engineering
controls to achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL and STEL; and April 10, 2000 for
employers with fewer than 20 employees to use engineering controls to
achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL and STEL.
OSHA recognizes that employers should receive a reasonable amount
of notice before the start-up dates for installation of engineering
controls and use of respirators take effect. Accordingly, to assure
that employers who would receive extensions of the start-up dates if
the motion is granted have sufficient notice, OSHA concludes it is
appropriate to extend the start-up dates that would otherwise take
effect on or before April 10, 1998. Accordingly, the agency is (1)
extending the start-up date for all employers subject to the motion to
use respiratory protection to achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL to August 31,
1998; and (2) extending the start-up for employers with 20 or more
employees (except polyurethane foam manufacturers with 20-99 employees)
to install engineering controls to achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL and STEL
to December 10, 1998. To further assure that employers are afforded a
reasonable amount of notice of the date by which they must comply with
these provisions, OSHA may further extend these start-up dates if a
final ruling on the joint motion is not issued sufficiently far in
advance of the August 31, 1998 start-up date for use of respiratory
protection to achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL that is being established by
this partial stay.
The parties request extensions of compliance deadlines only for
installation of engineering controls and for use of respiratory
protection to meet the 8-hour TWA PEL. As their motion points out,
employees exposed to methylene chloride will still receive important
protection from other provisions of the standard even if their motion
is granted. Thus, during the period covered by this partial stay,
employers will, by the start-up dates currently established by the
standard be required to achieve the STEL (by either engineering
controls or respiratory protection, at their option), implement all
feasible work practice controls to reduce methylene chloride exposures,
and comply with all other provisions of the MC standard that are not
being stayed. Moreover, all employers must achieve the prior limits
specified in 29 CFR 1910.1000 Table Z-2 with feasible engineering
controls until the new exposure limits take effect.
OSHA further finds that there is good cause to issue this stay
without notice and public comment because following such procedures
would be impractical, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest in
this case.
Authority and Signature: This document was prepared under the
direction of Charles N. Jeffress, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1910
Chemicals, Hazardous Substances, Occupational safety and health.
Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of December 1997.
Charles N. Jeffress,
Assistant Secretary of Labor.
Part 1910 of title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 1910--[AMENDED]
1. The general authority citation for subpart Z of 29 CFR part 1910
continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: Sections 4, 6, and 8 of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 653, 655, and 657); Secretary of
Labor's Order No. 12-71 (36 FR 8754), 8-76
[[Page 66277]]
(41 FR 25059), 9-83 (48 FR 35736), 1-90 (55 FR 9033), or 6-96 (62 FR
111), as applicable; and 29 CFR Part 1911.
* * * * *
2. A note is added after paragraph (o) of Sec. 1910.1052 to read as
follows:
Sec. 1910.1052 Methylene Chloride.
* * * * *
[Note to paragraph (o): The requirement of 29 CFR
1910.1052(g)(1) to use respiratory protection whenever an employee's
exposure to methylene chloride exceeds or can reasonably be expected
to exceed the 8-hour TWA PEL is hereby stayed until August 31, 1998
for employers engaged in polyurethane foam manufacturing; foam
fabrication; furniture refinishing; general aviation aircraft
stripping; formulation of products containing methylene chloride;
boat building and repair; recreational vehicle manufacture; van
conversion; upholstery; and use of methylene chloride in
construction work for restoration and preservation of buildings,
painting and paint removal, cabinet making and/or floor refinishing
and resurfacing.
The requirement of 29 CFR 1910.1052(f)(1) to implement
engineering controls to achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL and STEL is
hereby stayed until December 10, 1998 for employers with more than
100 employees engaged in polyurethane foam manufacturing and for
employers with more than 20 employees engaged in foam fabrication;
furniture refinishing; general aviation aircraft stripping;
formulation of products containing methylene chloride; boat building
and repair; recreational vehicle manufacture; van conversion;
upholstery; and use of methylene chloride in construction work for
restoration and preservation of buildings, painting and paint
removal, cabinet making and/or floor refinishing and resurfacing.]
[FR Doc. 97-33027 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-M