[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64806-64808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32212]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-559-001]
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review:
Certain Refrigeration Compressors From the Republic of Singapore
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 9, 1997.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Bolling or Rick Johnson, Office
of Antidumping/Countervailing Duty Enforcement, Group III, Office IX,
Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 1874, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone
(202) 482-3434, or 482-0165, respectively.
SUMMARY: In response to requests by the Government of the Republic of
Singapore (GOS), Matsushita Refrigeration Industries (Singapore) Pte.
Ltd. (MARIS), Asia Matsushita Electric (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (AMS), and
the petitioner, Tecumseh Products Company (Tecumseh), the Department of
Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the
agreement suspending the countervailing duty investigation on certain
refrigeration compressors from the Republic of Singapore. This review
covers the GOS, MARIS, and AMS. AMS was the sole exporter of the
subject merchandise to the United States during the period April 1,
1995, through March 31, 1996, the period of review (POR). We
preliminarily determine that the signatories have complied with the
terms of the suspension agreement during the POR.
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary
results. Parties who submit arguments in this proceeding are requested
to submit with their argument (1) a statement of the issue and (2) a
brief summary of the argument.
Applicable Statute
Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute and to the
Department's regulations are in reference to the provisions as they
existed on or after January 1, 1995, the effective date of the
amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Tariff Act) in
accordance with the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 18, 1996, the GOS, MARIS, and AMS, requested an
administrative review of the agreement suspending the countervailing
duty investigation on certain refrigeration compressors from the
Republic of Singapore (Certain Refrigeration Compressors from the
Republic of Singapore: Suspension of Countervailing Duty Investigation,
(``Refrigeration Compressors'') 48 FR 51167, 51170 (November 7, 1983)).
On November 19, 1996, petitioner also requested an administrative
review of the agreement suspending the countervailing duty
investigation on certain refrigeration compressors from the Republic of
Singapore. We initiated the review on December 16, 1996 (Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 61 FR
66017, (December 16, 1996)). The Department is now
[[Page 64807]]
conducting this review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act
and 19 CFR 355.22. The Department issued a questionnaire on April 9,
1997, and received a joint questionnaire response from the GOS, MARIS,
and AMS, on May 27, 1997. On May 27, 1997, the Department extended the
time limit for completing these preliminary results until December 2,
1997 (Extension of Time Limit for Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, 62 FR 28672, (May 27, 1997)). Subsequently, the Department sent
out a supplemental questionnaire on September 23, 1997 and received a
joint supplemental questionnaire response on October 7, 1997. We
conducted verification in Singapore of the questionnaire responses of
the GOS, MARIS, and AMS on October 29 and 31, 1997.
Scope of the Review
Imports covered by this review are shipments of hermetic
refrigeration compressors rated not over one-quarter horsepower from
Singapore. This merchandise is currently classified under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule (HTS) item number 8414.30.40. The HTS item number is
provided for convenience and Customs purposes. The written description
remains dispositive.
The review period is April 1, 1995 through March 31, 1996, and
includes 2 programs. The review covers one producer and one exporter of
the subject merchandise, MARIS and AMS, respectively. These two
companies, along with the GOS, are the signatories to the suspension
agreement.
Under the terms of the suspension agreement, the GOS agrees to
offset completely the amount of the net bounty or grant determined to
exist by the Department in this proceeding with respect to the subject
merchandise. The offset entails the collection by the GOS of an export
charge applicable to the subject merchandise exported on or after the
effective date of the agreement. See Refrigeration Compressors, 48 FR
51167, 51170 (November 7, 1983).
Analysis of Programs
(1) The Economic Expansion Incentives Act--Part VI
The Production for Export Programme under Part VI of the Economic
Expansion Incentives Act allows a 90-percent tax exemption on a
company's export profit if the GOS designates a company as an export
enterprise. In the investigation, the Department preliminarily found
this program to be countervailable because ``this tax exemption is
provided only to certified export enterprises.'' See Preliminary
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Refrigeration
Compressors from the Republic of Singapore, 48 FR 39109, 39110 (August
29, 1983). MARIS is designated as an export enterprise and used this
tax exemption during the period of review. AMS was not designated an
export enterprise under Part VI of the Economic Expansion Incentives
Act for the period of review.
According to the Export Enterprise Certificate awarded to MARIS in
a letter dated May 12, 1981, MARIS is to receive this benefit on the
production of compressors, electrical parts and accessories for
refrigerators, and plastic refrigerators. To calculate the benefit, we
divided the tax savings claimed by MARIS under this program by the
f.o.b. value of total exports of products receiving the benefit for the
period of review.
MARIS' response to the Department's countervailing duty
questionnaire for this review, which we confirmed at verification,
shows that MARIS deducted export charges levied pursuant to the
suspension agreement in arriving at an adjusted profit figure, which
was then used to calculate exempt export profit for the review period.
In the 90-91 administrative review, the Department determined that the
amount of the export charge deduction must be added ``back to MARIS'
export profit in calculating MARIS' tax savings in order to offset the
deduction of the export charges in the review period.'' See Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty Review: Certain Refrigeration
Compressors from Singapore, 57 FR 31175 (July 14, 1992), affirmed in
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Review: Certain Refrigeration
Compressors from Singapore, 57 FR 46539 (October 9, 1992). Therefore,
as the Department did in the 92-93 administrative review, in
calculating the benefit from this program, we have added back this
deduction. On this basis, we preliminarily determine the benefit from
this program during the review period to be 0.23 percent of the f.o.b.
value of the merchandise.
(2) Financing Through the Monetary Authority of Singapore
Under the terms of the suspension agreement, MARIS and AMS agreed
not to apply for or receive any financing provided by the rediscount
facility of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for shipments of
the subject merchandise to the United States. At verification, we
confirmed that, during the period of review neither MARIS nor AMS
received any financing through the MAS on subject merchandise exported
to the United States. Therefore, we preliminarily determine that both
companies have complied with this clause of the agreement.
Preliminary Results of Review
The suspension agreement states that the GOS will offset completely
with an export charge the net bounty or grant calculated by the
Department. We preliminarily determine that the signatories have
complied with the terms of the suspension agreement, including the
payment of the provisional export charges in effect for the period
April 1, 1995 through March 31, 1996. We also preliminarily determine
the net bounty or grant to be 0.23 percent of the f.o.b. value of the
merchandise for the April 1, 1995 through March 31, 1996 review period.
Following the methodology outlined in section B.4 of the agreement,
the Department preliminarily determines that, for the period April 1,
1995 through March 31, 1996, a negative adjustment may be made to the
provisional export charge rate in effect. The adjustments will equal
the difference between the provisional rate in effect during the review
period and the rate determined in this review, plus interest. The
provisional rate, established in the notice of the final results of the
90-91 administrative reviews of the suspension agreement (See Certain
Refrigeration Compressors from the Republic of Singapore: Final Results
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR 46539, 46540
(October 9, 1992)) was 5.52 percent. This rate was in effect from April
1, 1995 through March 12, 1996. On March 13, 1996, the Department
established in the notice of the final results of the 92-93
administrative review of the suspension agreement a new provisional
rate of 3.00 percent (See Certain Refrigeration Compressors from the
Republic of Singapore: Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 61 FR 10315 (March 13, 1996)). If the
Department's preliminary results do not change in the final, we will
notify the GOS that it may refund or credit, in accordance with section
B.4.c of the agreement, the difference between the above amounts and
the 0.23 percent, plus interest, calculated in accordance with section
778(b) of the Tariff Act, within 30 days of notification by the
Department. The Department will notify the GOS of these adjustments
after publication of the final results of this review.
Furthermore, if the final results of this review remain the same as
these
[[Page 64808]]
preliminary results, the Department intends to notify the GOS that the
provisional export charge rate on all exports to the United States with
Outward Declarations filed on or after the date of publication of the
final results of this administrative review shall be 0.23 percent of
the f.o.b. value of the merchandise.
The agreement can remain in force only as long as shipments from
the signatories account for at least 85 percent of imports of the
subject refrigeration compressors into the United States. Our
information indicates that the two signatory companies accounted for
100 percent of imports into the United States from Singapore of this
merchandise during the review period.
Parties to the proceeding may request disclosure within 5 days of
the date of publication of this notice. Any interested party may
request a hearing within 10 days of publication. Case briefs and/or
written comments from interested parties may be submitted no later than
30 days after the date of publication. Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals to
written comments, limited to issues raised in the case briefs and
comments, may be filed not later than 37 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Any hearing, if requested, will be held 44
days after the date of publication, or the first workday thereafter.
The Department will publish the final results of this administrative
review including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any
such written comments or at a hearing.
These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
publication of the final results of the next administrative review.
This administrative review and this notice are in accordance with
section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 353.22.
Dated: December 2, 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-32212 Filed 12-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P