[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 60296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-29419]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-39291]
Order Denying Exemption From Broker-Dealer Registration to
Investors Direct Empowerment Association, Inc.
November 3, 1997.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION: Denial of exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission is denying an exemption
from broker-dealer registration pursuant to Section 15(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to Investors Direct Empowerment
Association, Inc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine McGuire, Chief Counsel, or Lourdes Gonzalez, Special Counsel,
(202) 942-0073, Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Market Regulation,
Mail Stop 5-10, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20549.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Investors Direct Empowerment Association, Inc. (``IDEA''), a not-
for-profit corporation, has requested an exemption, pursuant to Section
15(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act''),
from the broker-dealer registration requirement of Section 15(a)(1) of
the Exchange Act.
Under IDEA's proposed program, IDEA would purchase one share of
stock from various corporations with dividend reinvestment and stock
purchase plans (``DRSPPs'') and then would join each corporation's
DRSPP. An investor interested in joining a corporation's DRSPP would
send funds to IDEA, made payable to an unaffiliated escrow agent, for
the purchase of specified securities. IDEA would aggregate investors'
funds, then forward them to the appropriate DRSPP to purchase shares of
that corporation in IDEA's name as nominee. IDEA then would allocate
the shares purchased among participating investors. IDEA would charge a
fee per order received.
IDEA maintains that its proposed program is similar to a program
operated since 1979 by another not-for-profit corporation, the National
Association of Investors Corporation (formerly the National Association
of Investment Clubs) (``NAIC''), for which the Commission granted an
exemption pursuant to Section 15(a)(2) of the Exchange Act. In granting
the NAIC's exemption in 1979, the Commission stated that ``it would be
in the public interest to grant the NAIC a conditional exemption with
respect to registration as a broker or dealer. The NAIC proposes to
offer brokerage services to a potentially large number of customers
through an unusual and novel program.'' \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Letter re the National Association of Investment Clubs
(June 1, 1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Discussion
The Commission cannot find that exempting IDEA from the broker-
dealer registration requirement would be consistent with the public
interest and the protection of investors. Although IDEA's goal of
providing small investors with a means of buying securities at fees
lower than those charged by broker-dealers is laudable, IDEA's proposed
program presents significant investor protection concerns. These
concerns are among the primary reasons the Exchange Act normally
requires broker-dealer registration. In particular, IDEA's control over
investors' funds and securities would expose investors to the same
types of risks as those inherent in dealing with a registered broker-
dealer. IDEA's status as a not-for-profit corporation does not mitigate
these concerns.
While only a limited number of DRSPPs currently permit direct
investment by first time investors, this number is increasing rapidly.
In response to investor concerns with respect to T+3 settlement, the
Commission took several steps in December 1994 to permit investors to
buy securities directly from issuers through ``open availability''
direct registration programs and to permit investors to leave these
securities with transfer agents.\2\ These initiatives were designed, in
part, to facilitate investors' access to issuer DRSPPs. IDEA's program,
therefore, is not so unusual or novel, and does not present any other
compelling justifications, as to mitigate the investor protection
concerns raised by IDEA's handling of investors' funds and securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35058 (December 1,
1994); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35040 (December 1, 1994);
Letter re: The Securities Transfer Association (December 1, 1994);
Letter re: First Chicago Trust Company of New York (December 1,
1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 15(a)(2) of the
Exchange Act, that IDEA's request for an exemption from broker-dealer
registration pursuant to Section 15(a)(1) of the Exchange Act is
denied.
By the Commission.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-29419 Filed 11-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M