[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52452-52469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26938]



[[Page 52451]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part IV





Office of Management and Budget





_______________________________________________________________________



Cancellation Pursuant to Line Item Veto Act; Military Construction 
Appropriations Act, 1998; Notice

  Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 / 
Notices  

[[Page 52452]]



OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Cancellation Pursuant to Line Item Veto Act; Military 
Construction Appropriations Act, 1998

October 6, 1997.
    One Special Message from the President under the Line Item Veto Act 
is published below. The President signed this message on October 6, 
1997. Under the Act, the message is required to be printed in the 
Federal Register (2 U.S.C. 691a(c)(2)).
Clarence C. Crawford,
Associate Director for Administration.
To the Congress of the United States:

    In accordance with the Line Item Veto Act, I hereby cancel the 
dollar amounts of discretionary budget authority, as specified in 
the attached reports, contained in the ``Military Construction 
Appropriations Act, 1998'' (Public Law 105-45; H.R. 2016). I have 
determined that the cancellation of these amounts will reduce the 
Federal budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government 
functions, and will not harm the national interest.

William J. Clinton.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
    October 6, 1997.
      

Cancellation No. 97-4

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $2,650 
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Live Fire Command 
and Control Facility, Fort Irwin, California'' on page 17 of House 
Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct a command and control facility to execute 
the tactical, administrative, and safety functions in brigade-level 
live fire operations. The project includes a helicopter landing pad, 
radio relay rooms, and supporting infrastructure. The project is being 
canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 
Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of 
military service members and their families; and (3) architectural and 
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely 
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without 
this project, Fort Irwin will be able to continue to operate and train 
using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal years:                                                           
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -1
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -0
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -3
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$2,650 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Live Fire Command 
and Control Facility, Fort Irwin (Military Construction, Army).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: California, 40th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: California: one; 40th 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-5

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $8,500 
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Rotational Wash 
Point, Fort Irwin, California'' on page 17 of House Report 105-247 
dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would provide a central, 24 bay wash facility for wheeled 
and tracked vehicles to supplement existing wash facilities. The 
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, Fort Irwin will be able to continue to 
operate using existing wash facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a

[[Page 52453]]

result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not increase, as 
specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on the Federal 
budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial effect on 
the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -3
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -9
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$8,500 thousand in FY 1998
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Irwin 
Rotational Wash Point (Military Construction, Army).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: California, 40th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: California: two; 40th 
District: two.

Cancellation No. 97-6

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1 (A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $10,100 
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project, ``Waterfront 
Operations Building, Coronado Naval Amphibious Base, California'' on 
page 17 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C), (E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct facilities for Explosive Ordnance Disposal 
Mobile Unit Three (EODMU THREE), including two buildings and a harbor 
area to provide protection for the Marine Mammal Program. The project 
is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's 
FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of 
life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, EODMU THREE will be able to continue to 
operate and train using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -4
    2000........................................................      -3
    2001........................................................      -2
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -10
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$10,100 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Coronado Naval 
Amphibious Base Waterfront Operations Building (Military Construction, 
Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: California, 49th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: California: three; 49th 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-7

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $6,690 
thousand for Military Construction, Naval Reserve project ``Marine 
Corps Reserve Center, Pasadena, California'' on page 17 of House Report 
105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct a new Marine Corps Reserve Center for the 
4th Light Anti-Air Defense (LAAD) Battalion and demolish existing 
facilities. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not 
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not 
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members 
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of 
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can 
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, the 4th 
LAAD Battalion will be able to continue to operate using existing 
facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -7
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$6,690 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.

[[Page 52454]]

    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Pasadena Marine 
Corps Reserve Center (Military Construction, Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: California, 27th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: California: four; 27th 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-8

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $16,000 
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Railyard Expansion 
(Phase I) Fort Carson, Colorado'' on page 17 of House Report 105-247 
dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would remove existing rail, turnouts and crossings and 
construct 26,400 feet of new track, including turnouts and crossings. 
The project would also construct a new remote loading facility, rail 
engine maintenance facility, warehouse and associated facilities. The 
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, Fort Carson will be able to continue to 
operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -3
    1999........................................................      -5
    2000........................................................      -4
    2001........................................................      -3
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -16
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$16,000 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Carson Railyard 
Expansion (Phase I) (Military Construction, Army).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Colorado, 5th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Colorado: one; 5th 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-9

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $17,940 
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Pier Improvements, 
Mayport Naval Station, Florida'' on page 18 of House Report 105-247 
dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would provide dredging and pier improvements to increase 
the number of larger berths for homeported and visiting ships. The 
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, Mayport Naval Station will be able to 
continue to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -8
    2000........................................................      -5
    2001........................................................      -3
    2002........................................................      -1
    2003........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -18
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$17,940 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Mayport Naval 
Station, Pier Improvements (Military Construction, Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Florida, 4th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Florida: one; 4th 
District: one.

[[Page 52455]]

Cancellation No. 97-10

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $1,300 
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Runway Upgrades, 
Whiting Field, Florida'' on page 18 of House Report 105-247, dated 
September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would extend one runway and acquire a clear zone for 
another. A longer runway and clear zone are required for the new Beech 
MKII training aircraft, scheduled to arrive in FY 2002. The project is 
being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 
1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life 
of military service members and their families; and (3) architectural 
and engineering design of this project has not started, making it 
unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. 
Without this project, Whiting Field will be able to continue to operate 
using existing runways.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal Year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -1
    2000........................................................      -0
    2001........................................................      -0
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -1
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$1,300 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Runway Upgrades, 
Whiting Field (Military Construction, Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Florida, 1st 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Florida: two; 1st 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-11

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $6,800 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``HH-60 Rescue 
Operations Facility, Moody Air Force Base (AFB), Georgia'' on page 18 
of House Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide a facility to support combat search and 
rescue training and pararescue training operations when this mission 
relocates from Patrick AFB. The project is being canceled because: (1) 
it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would 
not substantially improve the quality of life of military service 
members and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering 
design of this project has not started, making it unlikely that these 
funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Since this new 
mission has not yet relocated from Patrick AFB, cancellation of this 
project will not affect ongoing operations at Moody AFB.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -7
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$6,800 thousand in FY1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): HH-60 Rescue 
Operations Facility, Moody AFB (Military Construction, Air Force).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Georgia, 2nd 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Georgia: one; 2nd 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-12

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $9,500 
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Asian Pacific 
Center, Fort Derussey, Hawaii'' on page 19 of House Report 105-247, 
dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide new space for the Asian-Pacific Center for 
Security Studies. The

[[Page 52456]]

Center provides facilities and programs for national officials and 
military officers to explore pressing issues regarding the security 
environment of the Asian-Pacific region. The project is being canceled 
because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; 
(2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of military 
service members and their families; and (3) architectural and 
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely 
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without 
this project, the Navy will continue to be able to operate the Center 
in existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -4
    2000........................................................      -3
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -10
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$9,500 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Derussey Asian-
Pacific Center (Military Construction, Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Hawaii, 1st 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Hawaii: one; 1st District: 
one.

Cancellation No. 97-13

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $9,200 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``B-1B Avionics 
Building (Bldg), Mountain Home Air Force Base (AFB), Idaho'' on page 19 
of House Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide a new facility for Air Expeditionary Wing's 
avionics repair. The facility would be used for an electronic 
countermeasure pod shop, low altitude navigation and targeting infrared 
for night (LANTIRN) shop, and other avionics repair and test functions. 
The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, avionics functions at Mountain Home AFB 
will be able to continue to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -3
    2000........................................................      -3
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -9
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$9,200 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): B-1B Avionics 
Building Mountain Home AFB (Military Construction, Air Force).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Idaho, 2nd 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Idaho: one; 2nd District: 
one.

Cancellation No. 97-14

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $3,750 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``F-15C Squadron 
Operations Facility, Mountain Home Air Force Base (AFB), Idaho'' on 
page 19 of House Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide a facility to plan, brief and critique 
combat crews and to direct flight operations. The project also would 
demolish the existing operations facility, built in 1970. The project 
is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's 
FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of 
life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, F-15C squadrons at Mountain Home AFB 
will be able to

[[Page 52457]]

continue to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -1
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -4
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$3,750 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): F-15C Squadron 
Operations Facility Mountain Home AFB (Military Construction, Air 
Force).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Idaho, 2nd 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Idaho: two; 2nd District: 
two.

Cancellation No. 97-15

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,120 
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Chemical-Biological 
Warfare Detection Center, Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indiana'' 
on page 20 of House Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide a new maintenance, overhaul and engineering 
support facility for shipboard chemical/biological warfare detection 
devices, to replace a smaller, existing facility. The project is being 
canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 
Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of 
military service members and their families; and (3) architectural and 
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely 
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without 
this project, Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center will be able to 
continue to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -4
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$4,120 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Chemical-Biological 
Warfare Detection Center, Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center (Military 
Construction, Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Indiana, 8th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Indiana: one; 8th 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-16

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $8,913 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force Reserve project ``Base 
Civil Engineer Complex, Grissom Air Reserve Base, Indiana'' on page 20 
of House Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    (C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide a new base civil engineer complex to include 
maintenance shops, warehouse storage, and a roads and grounds facility. 
The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, Grissom Air Reserve Base will be able to 
continue to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -3
    2000........................................................      -3
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -9
                                                                        


[[Page 52458]]

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$8,913 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Grissom Air Reserve 
Base Civil Engineer Complex (Military Construction, Air Force Reserve).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Indiana, 5th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Indiana: two; 5th 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-17

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $2,850 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``Transportation 
Complex, McConnell Air Force Base (AFB), Kansas'' on page 20 of House 
Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide a new transportation complex, including a 
vehicle operations administration facility and vehicle parking 
facility. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not 
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not 
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members 
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of 
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can 
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, 
McConnell AFB will be able to continue to perform transportation 
functions using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -1
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -0
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -3
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$2,850 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): McConnell AFB 
Transportation Complex (Military Construction, Air Force).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Kansas, 4th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Kansas: one; 4th District: 
one.

Cancellation No. 97-18

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $9,900 
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Tactical Equipment 
Shop (Phase II), Fort Campbell, Kentucky'' on page 20 of House Report 
105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide a vehicle maintenance shop and storage for a 
forward support battalion and combat support hospital. The project also 
would demolish facilities currently used for vehicle maintenance. The 
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, Fort Campbell will be able to continue 
to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -2
    1999........................................................      -3
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -2
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -10
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits Budget

    Authority: -$9,900 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Campbell 
Tactical Equipment Shop (Phase II) (Military Construction, Army).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Kentucky, 1st 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Kentucky: one; 1st 
District: one.

[[Page 52459]]

Cancellation No. 97-19

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $7,200 
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Qualification 
Training Range (QTR), Fort Knox, Kentucky'' on page 20 of House Report 
105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would modernize Heins Rifle Range to a new standard 
Qualification Training Range with a total of 28 firing lanes. The 
project would construct three control towers, a headquarters building, 
two general instruction buildings, and other supporting facilities. The 
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, Fort Knox will be able to continue to 
operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -7
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$7,200 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Knox 
Qualification Training Range (Military Construction, Army).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Kentucky, 2nd 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Kentucky: two; 2nd 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-20

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $2,610 
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Maintenance Hangar, 
St. Inigoes Naval Electronic Systems Engineering Activity, Maryland'' 
on page 21 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would provide additional hangar space to support 
maintenance operations on unmanned air vehicles. The project is being 
canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 
Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of 
military service members and their families; and (3) architectural and 
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely 
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without 
this project, the St. Inigoes Naval Electronic Systems Engineering 
Activity will be able to continue to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -1
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -0
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -3
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$2,610 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Maintenance Hangar, 
St. Inigoes Naval Electronic Systems Engineering Activity, Maryland 
(Military Construction, Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Maryland, 5th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Maryland: Maryland one; 
5th District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-21

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,500 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project, ``Add/Alter 
Airmen Dining Facility, Malmstrom Air Force Base (AFB), Montana,'' on 
page 22 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any

[[Page 52460]]

essential Government functions, and will not harm the national 
interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would add dry and cold storage and alter the equipment and 
food preparation areas of the current facility. The project is being 
canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 
Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of 
military service members and their families; and (3) architectural and 
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely 
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without 
this project, Malmstrom AFB will be able to continue to operate using 
existing dining facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -5
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$4,500 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Addition/Alterations 
to the Airmen Dining Facility, Malmstrom AFB (Military Construction, 
Air Force).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Montana, 1st 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Montana: one; 1st 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-22

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $1,950 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``Munitions 
Maintenance Facility, Nellis Air Force Base (AFB), Nevada'' on page 22 
of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct a larger, replacement facility to support 
the inspection, assembly and testing of explosive munitions used by 
training aircraft. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was 
not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not 
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members 
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of 
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can 
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, Nellis 
AFB will be able to continue to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [in millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -1
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -0
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -2
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$1,950 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Nellis AFB Munitions 
Maintenance Facility (Military Construction, Air Force).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Nevada, 2nd 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Nevada: one; 2nd District: 
one.

Cancellation No. 97-23

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $6,900 
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Launch Complex 
Revitalization, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico'' on page 23 of 
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would repair launch facilities for the Patriot, Stinger, 
Chaparral and HAWK missiles, as well as for the Multiple Launch Rocket 
System (MLRS) and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS). The project 
would also construct a new personnel support area and test support 
facility. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not 
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not 
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members 
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of 
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can 
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, White 
Sands will be able to continue to operate in existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal

[[Page 52461]]

outlays will not increase, as specified below. This will have a 
commensurate effect on the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, 
will have a beneficial effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -7
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$6,900 thousand in fiscal year: 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): White Sands Missile 
Range Launch Complex Revitalization (Military Construction, Army).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: New Mexico, 2nd 
District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: New Mexico: one; 2nd 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-24

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $14,000 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``Flight 
Simulation Training Facility, Kirtland Air Force Base (AFB), New 
Mexico'' on page 23 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct a new theater air simulation facility to 
support command and control; weapons system research, development, 
testing and evaluation; and training. The project is being canceled 
because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; 
(2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of military 
service members and their families; and (3) architectural and 
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely 
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without 
this project, Kirtland AFB will be able to continue to operate and 
train using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [in millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -2
    1999........................................................      -5
    2000........................................................      -4
    2001........................................................      -2
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -14
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$14,000 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Kirtland AFB Flight 
Simulation Training Facility (Military Construction, Air Force).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: New Mexico, 1st 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: New Mexico: two; 1st 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-25

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $9,000 
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Aerial Gunnery Range 
(Phase I), Fort Drum, New York'' on page 23 of House Report 105-247 
dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would provide a target range for joint rotary and fixed 
wing operations, replacing the two existing ranges at Fort Drum. The 
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, units at Fort Drum will be able to 
continue to operate using the existing ranges.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -3
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -2
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -9
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$9,000 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.

[[Page 52462]]

    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Drum Aerial 
Gunnery Range. (Phase I) (Military Construction, Army).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: New York, 24th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: New York: two; 24th 
District: two.

Cancellation No. 97-26

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $2,100 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force Reserve project 
``Consolidated Training Facility, Niagara Falls IAP, New York'' on page 
23 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct one building to house the readiness office 
and combat arms training space. The facility would replace two older 
buildings. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not 
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not 
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members 
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of 
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can 
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, Niagara 
Falls units will be able to continue to operate and train using 
existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -1
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -0
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -2
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$2,100 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Niagara Falls IAP 
Consolidated Training Facility (Military Construction, Air Force 
Reserve).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: New York, 27th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: New York: three; 27th 
District: two.

Cancellation No. 97-27

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $7,900 
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Military Operations 
on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT) Training Complex (Phase I) Fort Bragg, 
North Carolina,'' on page 23 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 
1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct part of an MOUT training complex, 
consisting of 32 buildings with streets, parking, a bridge, and 
associated support facilities. The project is being canceled because: 
(1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it 
would not substantially improve the quality of life of military service 
members and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering 
design of this project has not started, making it unlikely that these 
funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this 
project, forces at Fort Bragg will be able to continue to train using 
existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [in millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:....................................................        
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -8
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$7,900 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Bragg, MOUT 
Training Complex (Phase I) (Military Construction, Army).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: North Carolina, 
7th Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: North Carolina: one; 7th 
District: one.

[[Page 52463]]

Cancellation No. 97-28

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $6,000 
thousand for Military Construction, Army Reserve project ``U.S. Army 
Reserve Center/Organizational Maintenance Shop (OMS)/Area Maintenance 
Support Activity (AMSA) (Phase I) Oakdale, Pennsylvania'' on page 24 of 
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct a new Army Reserve training facility to 
house multiple training missions, including communications security and 
deployable medical systems. The project is being canceled because: (1) 
it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would 
not substantially improve the quality of life of military service 
members and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering 
design of this project has not started, making it unlikely that these 
funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this 
project, Oakdale Army Reserve units will be able to continue to operate 
and train using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -3
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -6
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits Budget 
Authority: -$6,000 thousand in FY 1998 .

    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Oakdale, Army 
Reserve Center/ OMS/AMSA (Phase I) (Military Construction, Army 
Reserve).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Pennsylvania, 
20th Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Pennsylvania: one; 20th 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-29

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $13,980 
thousand for Military Construction, Naval Reserve project ``Reserve 
Hangar and Training Center, Johnstown, Pennsylvania'' on page 24 of 
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct a Marine Corps Reserve Training Center and 
an aircraft maintenance hangar to upgrade the current facilities. The 
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, units at the Johnstown Joint Reserve 
Facility will be able to continue to operate and train using existing 
facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -5
    2000........................................................      -4
    2001........................................................      -3
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -14
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$13,980 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Marine Corps Reserve 
Center and Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, Johnstown (Military 
Construction, Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Pennsylvania, 
12th Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Pennsylvania: two; 12th 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-30

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $3,823 
thousand for Military Construction, Army National Guard project 
``Regional Simulation Center, Leesburg Training Site (Eastover), South 
Carolina'' on page 25 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any

[[Page 52464]]

essential Government functions, and will not harm the national 
interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct a 48,000 sq. ft. battle simulation center 
to replace a 4,200 sq. ft. facility. The project is being canceled 
because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; 
(2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of military 
service members and their families; and (3) architectural and 
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely 
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without 
this project, area Army National Guard units will be able to continue 
to train using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -1
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -4
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$3,823 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments Upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Leesburg Regional 
Simulation Center (Military Construction, Army National Guard).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: South Carolina, 
2nd Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: South Carolina: one; 2nd 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-31

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016)
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $5,200 
thousand for Military Construction, Army National Guard project, 
``Aviation Support Facility, Rapid City, South Dakota,'' on page 25 of 
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would provide new hangar, administrative, maintenance, 
classroom, and other space to support UH-1 and C-12 aircraft used by 
the 1085th Medical Air Ambulance Company. The project is being canceled 
because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; 
(2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of military 
service members and their families; and (3) architectural and 
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely 
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without 
this project, the Rapid City Army National Guard will be able to 
continue to operate and train using existing maintenance facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [in millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -1
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -5
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$5,200 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Military Aviation 
Support Facility, Rapid City (Military Construction, Army National 
Guard).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: South Dakota, 
1st Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: South Dakota: one; 1st 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-32

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $9,900 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``Atmospheric Air 
Dryer Facility, Arnold Air Force Base (AFB), Tennessee,'' on page 25 of 
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct an air dryer facility to replace the 
existing facility. The new facility would support the mission of the 
Propulsion Wind Tunnel (PWT) facility for the F-22 and Joint Strike 
Fighter (JSF) next generation aircraft. The PWT performs aerodynamic 
testing which requires dry air for simulating flight conditions. The 
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, Arnold AFB will be able to continue to 
operate and test using existing dryer facilities.

[[Page 52465]]

    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -3
    2000........................................................      -3
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -10
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$9,900 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Atmospheric Air 
Dryer Facility, Arnold AFB (Military Construction, Air Force).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Tennessee, 4th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Tennessee: one; 4th 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-33

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $7,700 
thousand for Military Construction, Army project, ``Ammunition Supply 
Point Expansion (Phase II), Fort Bliss, Texas,'' on page 25 of House 
Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide 11 ammunition magazines, a surveillance 
workshop, inert storage facilities, an equipment storage and 
maintenance facility, and an above ground petroleum, oils and 
lubricants (POL) dispensing facility. This is phase two of a relocation 
of this function from the main post to McGregor Range. The project is 
being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 
1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life 
of military service members and their families; and (3) architectural 
and engineering design of this project has not started, making it 
unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. 
Without this project, Fort Bliss will be able to continue to operate 
using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -8
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$7,700 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Ammunition Supply 
Point Expansion (Phase II), Fort Bliss (Military Construction, Army).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Texas, 16th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Texas: one; 16th District: 
one.

Cancellation No. 97-34

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $10,000 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project, ``B-1 Squadron 
Operations(Ops)/Aircraft Maintenance Unit, Dyess Air Force Base (AFB), 
Texas,'' on page 25 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide a consolidated B-1B squadron operations 
facility, including space for flight operations, maintenance, storage 
and training functions. The 13th Bombardment Squadron(BS) is standing 
up at Dyess and will operate out of temporary facilities until a new 
facility is constructed. The 9th BS currently operates out of six 
buildings. The consolidated facility would house both squadrons. The 
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the 
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the 
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, squadrons at Dyess AFB will be able to 
continue to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -4

[[Page 52466]]

                                                                        
    2000........................................................      -3
    2001........................................................      -2
    2002........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -10
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$10,000 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Consolidated B-1B 
Squadron Operations and Aircraft Maintenance Facility, Dyess AFB 
(Military Construction, Air Force).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Texas, 17th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Texas: two; 17th District: 
one.

Cancellation No. 97-35

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,800 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project, ``Corrosion 
Control Facility, Laughlin Air Force Base (AFB), Texas,'' on page 25 of 
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide a new facility for painting T-1A, T-37 and 
T-38 aircraft. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not 
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not 
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members 
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of 
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can 
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, Laughlin 
AFB will be able to continue to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -5
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$4,800 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Corrosion Control 
Facility, Laughlin AFB (Military Construction, Air Force).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Texas, 23rd 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Texas: three; 23rd 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-36

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $12,714 
thousand for Military Construction, Army Reserve project ``U.S. Army 
Reserve Center (USARC), Organizational Maintenance Shop (OMS), Camp 
Williams, Utah,'' on page 26 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 
1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct a new Reserve Center, Organizational 
Maintenance Shop (OMS), and a warehouse to replace facilities that 
would be lost if a proposed 11 acre transfer of property to the 
University of Utah occurred. A new site for relocation has not yet been 
identified. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not 
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not 
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members 
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of 
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can 
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, Fort 
Douglas (Camp Williams) Army Reserve Units will be able to continue to 
operate and train using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -5
    2000........................................................      -3
    2001........................................................      -2
    2002........................................................      -2
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -13
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$12,714 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Douglas, U.S. 
Army

[[Page 52467]]

Reserve Center and OMS Relocation (Military Construction, Army 
Reserve).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Utah, 2nd 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Utah: one; 2nd District: 
one.

Cancellation No. 97-37

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,000 
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Air Operations 
Building, Norfolk Naval Air Station, Virginia'' on page 26 of House 
Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would provide a new air operations facility, including an 
air traffic control facility, radar tower and supporting 
infrastructure. The existing facility would be demolished. The project 
is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's 
FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of 
life of military service members and their families; and (3) 
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started, 
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during 
FY 1998. Without this project, Norfolk Naval Air Station will be able 
to continue to operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -4
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$4,000 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Norfolk Naval Air 
Station, Air Operations Facility (Military Construction, Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Virginia, 2nd 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Virginia: one; 2nd 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-38

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $19,910 
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Waterfront 
Improvements, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Virginia'' on page 26 of House 
Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would provide a new wharf for ship repair and demolish two 
abandoned shipbuilding ways and two buildings. The project is being 
canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 
Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of 
military service members and their families; and (3) architectural and 
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely 
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without 
this project, the Norfolk Naval Shipyard will be able to continue to 
operate using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -1
    1999........................................................      -8
    2000........................................................      -6
    2001........................................................      -3
    2002........................................................      -1
    2003........................................................      -1
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................     -20
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$19,910 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Waterfront 
Improvements, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Virginia (Military Construction, 
Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Virginia, 2nd 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Virginia: two; 2nd 
District: two.

Cancellation No. 97-39

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $3,290 
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project, ``Tomahawk Magazine, 
Yorktown Naval Weapons Station, Virginia,'' on page 26

[[Page 52468]]

of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs. 
This project would provide an earth covered magazine for storage of 
Tomahawk missiles. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was 
not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not 
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members 
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of 
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can 
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, Yorktown 
Naval Weapons Station will be able to continue to operate using 
existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -1
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -0
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -3
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$3,290 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Tomahawk Magazine, 
Yorktown Naval Weapons Station (Military Construction, Navy).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Virginia, 1st 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Virginia: three; 1st 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-40

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $6,828 
thousand for Military Construction, Army National Guard project ``Armed 
Forces Reserve Center, Camp Dawson, West Virginia'' on page 27 of House 
Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would provide an expanded facility for several Army 
National Guard units. The new, enlarged facility would provide 
administrative, training, exercise and storage space. The project is 
being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 
1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life 
of military service members and their families; and (3) architectural 
and engineering design of this project has not started, making it 
unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. 
Without this project, Army National Guard units at Camp Dawson will be 
able to continue to operate and train using existing facilities.
    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -2
    2001........................................................      -2
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -7
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$6,828 thousand in FY1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Armed Forces Reserve 
Center, Camp Dawson, West Virginia (Military Construction, Army 
National Guard).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: West Virginia, 
1st Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: West Virginia: one; 1st 
District: one.

Cancellation No. 97-41

CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY

Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130

    Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998'' 
(H.R. 2016).
    1(A). Dollar Amount Item of Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,200 
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force Reserve, project ``Aerial 
Port Training Facility, Mitchell Air Reserve Station (ARS)(Milwaukee), 
Wisconsin'' on page 27 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
    1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal 
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and 
will not harm the national interest.
    1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and 
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and 
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs: 
This project would construct an aerial port training facility to 
replace existing, smaller facilities. The project is being canceled 
because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; 
(2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of military 
service members and their families; and (3) architectural and 
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely 
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without 
this project, Mitchell ARS will be able to continue to provide training 
using existing facilities.

[[Page 52469]]

    1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of 
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not 
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on 
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial 
effect on the economy.

                             Outlay changes                             
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
Fiscal year:                                                            
    1998........................................................      -0
    1999........................................................      -2
    2000........................................................      -1
    2001........................................................      -1
    2002........................................................      -0
                                                                 -------
      Total.....................................................      -4
                                                                        

1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits

    Budget Authority: -$4,200 thousand in FY 1998.
    Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
    Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration 
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would 
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
    2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
    2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
    2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Aerial Port Training 
Facility, Mitchell Air Reserve Station (Military Construction, Air 
Force Reserve).
    2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Wisconsin, 4th 
Congressional District.
    2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session 
in each State and District identified above: Wisconsin: one; 4th 
District: one.

[FR Doc. 97-26938 Filed 10-6-97; 4:32pm]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P