[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 48584-48585] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 97-24567] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary 14 CFR Part 260 [Docket No. OST-97-2622] Truth in Airfares AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT. ACTION: Request for comments, petition for rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Department is inviting interested persons to comment on a petition for rulemaking filed by Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. (``CU'') on June 16, 1997. The petition asks the Department to establish a ``Truth in Airfares'' regulation that would require commercial passenger carriers to disclose directly to consumers the most recently available average fare and lowest fare charged by the carrier for the route and class of service quoted to an inquiring party. CU also requests that the Department require the carriers to make this fare information available to computer reservations system vendors as well. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 17, 1997. Reply comments must be submitted on or before December 15, 1997. ADDRESSES: Comments must be filed in Room PL-401, Docket OST-97-2622, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Late filed comments will be considered to the extent possible. To facilitate consideration of comments, each commenter should file eight copies of its comments. Comments filed prior to the publication of this notice will also be considered. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Craun, Director of the Office of Aviation and International Economics, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh St. SW., [[Page 48585]] Washington, DC 20590 at (202) 366-1032 or (202) 366-7638 (FAX). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In its petition, CU stated that airfares have dropped during the past 15 years. As measured on an inflation- adjusted basis, average fares have decreased from 12.7 cents per mile in 1981 to eight cents per mile today, according to CU. CU also indicated that more than 550 million passengers traveled on commercial flights on U.S. airlines in 1996 and many of these trips were made possible because of the lower fares. Despite the large number of airline passengers and the increase in passenger travel 1 since airline deregulation, however, CU claims that it is almost impossible for passengers to determine whether they are getting a good, fair, or poor value, because of the way in which many airlines set their ticket prices. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\To quantify CU's statement regarding the increase in passenger travel, the Department notes that there were approximately 250 million domestic passengers traveling on U.S. airlines in 1978. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In support of its claim, CU cited a study of more than three million discount airline tickets purchased on 34 of the most heavily traveled domestic routes in 1996. (CU published an article on the study in the July 1997 issue of Consumer Reports and attached a copy of the article as part of this petition.) Based on an analysis of the average restricted coach class fares on each route, CU concluded that airline ticket prices for a given class of service between two points can vary by hundreds of dollars depending upon the availability of a wide range of fares, with availability determined not so much by the number of seats actually physically available but by how many seats the airline-- in its sole discretion--chooses to supply at each price. CU also asserts that, at any time, sale fares that are available in limited quantities can suddenly appear and disappear. According to CU, these constant fare changes confuse customers and effectively remove price information that helps consumers assess the value of the transportation. CU claims that the lack of reliable ``fair market price'' or ``going rate'' information available to the consumer at the time of ticket purchase establishes a barrier to effective comparison shopping and price-based bargaining by the ordinary consumer. This barrier gives an unfair advantage to a number of airlines (including the very largest airlines) in the buyer-seller transaction. The airlines can allegedly engage in opportunistic pricing practices because the consumer lacks the information needed to counter these practices. CU stated that consumers cannot rely on travel agents to solve the problem and cited, in support, an unsourced consumer test conducted by representatives of several state public interest research groups. In the test, fourteen phone calls were made to nine travel agents and airlines requesting the ``lowest'' advance-purchase round-trip fare from Boston to Houston on specified travel dates and at specified times. The requests netted ten different fare quotes ranging from $504 to $1,323.68 with six of the ten different fare quotes coming from travel agents. CU's Petition In order to address these issues, CU has filed a petition that asks the Department to adopt a regulation which would require airlines, their agents, and computer reservations system (CRS) vendors to disclose the average and lowest fares an airline charges for each class of service on a route to any person to whom they quote fares for a specific class of service on that route. The petitioner also requests that the Department require that airlines make this information available to CRSs and that the information be based on the latest available quarterly fare data in Databank #1 of the Department's Origin-Destination Survey of Airline Passenger Traffic. (Presumably, CU's petition applies to fares in domestic markets only since the Department is prohibited by regulation from publicly disclosing international fare data in the Origin-Destination Survey of Airline Passenger Traffic.) CU also asks that the Department either supply to each carrier the data to be disclosed or allow each carrier to calculate the data to be disclosed according to calculation standards prescribed by us and based on the information the carrier submits to the Department for inclusion in Databank1 of the Origin- Destination Survey of Airline Passenger Traffic. CU states that its petition provides the substance and the elements of the rule it is seeking but not a proposed text for a rule. However, since the purpose of its request is to give consumers bargaining power by increasing consumer information, the petitioner considers it important that a final rule cover as many consumer transactions as practicable and that neither the scope nor the specific provisions of the rule be so narrow as to limit the effectiveness of the rule. CU stated that by knowing both the average fare and the lowest fare charged by route, by airline, and by class of service, consumers would be armed with two key benchmarks of value that are critical to making an informed purchase decision. These two pieces of information, used together, would show the relevant range of prices with the average fare providing a broad indication of the relative value available by airline and the lowest fare indicating the market-clearing price. According to the petitioner, easy access to this information would enhance comparison shopping, informed consumer negotiation, price competition and market efficiency. Request for Comments In response to an increasing number of inquiries from consumers about domestic airline prices, the Department recently published the first edition of a report entitled Domestic Airline Fares Consumer Report. This report provides information about average prices being paid by consumers in the 1,000 largest domestic city-pair markets for the third quarter of 1996. In addition to the Department's commitment to provide fare information to consumers in this report, we have decided to consider further the issues raised by CU. We invite interested persons to comment on all aspects of the petition including, but not limited to, whether such a rule should be adopted and, if so, should the rule apply only to airlines, or to airlines as well as travel agents and discount travel brokers, such as consolidators. We will decide after reviewing those comments whether we should propose a rule as requested by CU. To the extent that commenters provide quantified estimates of the value or cost of implementing such a regulation, we ask that they provide specific supporting details regarding the methodologies used in determining these benefits and costs. We also encourage commenters to provide information on other possible alternatives for accomplishing the goals sought by CU in this petition. Issued in Washington, DC on September 8, 1997. Charles A. Hunnicutt, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. [FR Doc. 97-24567 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-62-P