[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 110 (Monday, June 9, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31341-31343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-14583]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IL 149-1a; FRL-5834-6]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 23, 1996, the State of Illinois submitted a site 
specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision request to revise 
Volatile Organic Material (VOM) Reasonably Available Control Technology 
(RACT) requirements for Chase Products Company in Broadview (Cook 
County), Illinois. VOM, as defined by the State of Illinois, is 
identical to ``volatile organic compounds'' (VOC), as defined by USEPA. 
Emissions of VOC react with other pollutants, such as oxides of 
nitrogen, on hot summer days to form ground-level ozone, commonly known 
as smog. Ozone pollution is of particular concern because of its 
harmful effects upon lung tissue and breathing passages.
    Chicago area RACT rules are intended to establish, for each 
particular major stationary source in the Chicago ozone nonattainment 
area, the lowest VOC emission limitation it is capable of meeting by 
the application of control technology that is reasonably available, 
considering technological and economic feasibility. RACT controls are a 
major component of the Chicago ozone nonattainment area's overall 
strategy to achieve and maintain attainment with the ozone standard. A 
direct final approval action is being taken because the submittal meets 
all pertinent Federal requirements.

DATES: The ``direct final'' is effective on August 8, 1997, unless 
USEPA receives adverse or critical comments by July 9, 1997. If the 
effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the 
Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the revision request are available for inspection 
at the following address: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604. (It is recommended that you telephone Ryan Bahr, 
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 353-4366 before visiting the Region 5 
Office.)
    Written comments should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Bahr at (312) 353-4366.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 182(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (Act) requires States with 
moderate and above ozone nonattainment areas to

[[Page 31342]]

adopt VOC RACT rules covering ``major'' sources not already covered by 
a Control Technique Guideline (CTG) for all areas designated 
nonattainment for ozone and classified as moderate or above. Under 
section 182(d), sources located in areas classified as ``severe'' are 
considered ``major'' sources if they have the potential to emit 25 tons 
per year or more of VOC.
    On October 21, 1993, and March 4, 1994, the State of Illinois 
submitted and supplemented, as a revision to the Illinois SIP, 
``generic'' RACT rules covering non-CTG major sources in the Chicago 
severe ozone nonattainment area, including subpart DD of part 218 of 35 
Illinois Administrative Code (IAC).
    Public hearings on the adjusted standard proposal were held on June 
26, 1995, and on August 2, 1995, in Chicago, Illinois and on August 8, 
1995, Chase Products and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 
(IEPA) filed a joint petition for an adjusted standard for Chase 
Products' Broadview, Illinois facility with the Illinois Pollution 
Control Board (Board). The adjusted standard petition sought relief for 
the Broadview facility's aerosol can filling lines from VOM control 
requirements found in part 218, subpart DD. Subpart DD requires that 90 
percent (%) of the cans filled on a monthly basis on the Broadview 
facility's aerosol can filling lines to be filled using a method called 
through the valve (TTV). TTV filling greatly reduces emissions when 
compared with the standard under the cup method (UTC). Subpart DD 
additionally requires the remaining cans to be filled using enhanced 
under the cup (EUTC) techniques or another approved system which 
reduces emissions by at least 75% of UTC emissions.
    On January 26, 1997, (61 FR 2423) the USEPA issued a direct final 
approval of the non-CTG rules, as a revision to the SIP. Adverse 
comments were received on the direct final rule and it was withdrawn by 
the USEPA on March 25, 1996 (61 FR 12030). A final rule addressing 
those comments and taking final action to approve the non-CTG rules was 
subsequently published October 21, 1996 (61 FR 54556), and became 
effective on November 20, 1996. Subpart DD of part 218 of 35 IAC was 
approved at that time. On March 12, 1997, technical amendments to 
subpart DD were approved (62 FR 11327), and became effective on May 12, 
1997.
    On May 16, 1996, the Board adopted a Final Opinion and Order, AS 
94-4, granting the adjusted standard, requiring Chase Products to fill 
95% of their cans using TTV and exempting Chase Products from the 
requirement to fill the remaining cans using EUTC; thereby allowing 
them to fill up to 2 million cans per year (not to exceed 5% of total 
cans filled per month) with UTC. The adjusted standard also became 
effective on May 16, 1996.
    The IEPA formally submitted the adjusted standard for the Chase 
Products Company on July 23, 1996, as a site-specific revision to the 
Illinois SIP for ozone. In doing so, IEPA intends to cover the Act's 
section 182(b)(2) major non-CTG RACT requirement for Chase Products' 
Broadview, Illinois facility. USEPA made a finding of completeness on 
this SIP submittal in a letter dated August 28, 1996.

II. State Submittal of Adjusted Standard

    The following is a summary of adjusted standard AS 94-4 
requirements for the Chase Products facility's aerosol filling lines:

A. Through the Valve Filling

    The Chase Products Company shall fill at least 95% of their cans on 
a monthly basis with TTV.

B. Under the Cup Filling

    The Chase Products Company is permitted to fill up to two million 
cans per year using UTC, not to exceed 5% of the cans filled on a 
monthly basis. All other cans must be filled using TTV, except for 
trial runs to verify product quality.

C. Recordkeeping and Reporting

    Chase Products Company shall maintain daily records, establishing 
the total number of cans filled by TTV and the total filled by UTC. 
These records shall be kept on file, and be available for inspection by 
the Agency (IEPA or USEPA), for three years.

D. Modifications

    If Chase Products Company modifies any of the filling lines at its 
Broadview facility after March 15, 1995, the Company shall meet all 
requirements of subpart DD.

III. Analysis of Adjusted Standard

    The site-specific SIP revision would alter the control requirements 
contained within part 218, subpart DD, section 218.686 of the 35 IAC as 
they apply to the Chase Product facility's aerosol can filling lines. 
Section 218.686 of subpart DD (61 FR 2425) is summarized as follows:
    Aerosol filling lines to which Subpart DD applies must comply 
with one of the following:

    (1) Use of add-on controls which achieve an overall reduction of 
81%, or,
    (2)(A) Use of TTV or EUTC or another system approved in a 
federally enforceable permit which achieves at least 75% reduction 
of UTC fill; and, (B) fill on a monthly basis at least 90% of cans 
filled on such aerosol can filling lines that are capable of being 
filled with TTV fill.

    The adjusted standard, approved by the Board May 16, 1996, most 
closely resembles the scenario outlined in option (2). The adjusted 
standard adheres to the central provision contained is option (2) part 
(B) by specifying that at least 95% of cans filled on the aerosol 
filling lines must be filled using TTV. In fact, the adjusted standard 
requires Chase Products to use TTV filling for 5% more cans than the 
current SIP minimum.
    The reason Chase Products requested an adjusted standard is that 
Chase Products has determined it to be technically infeasible to fill 
certain aerosol cans using anything but UTC. Therefore, the Chase 
Products facility can not comply with (2)(A) as specified above for the 
remaining 5% of cans.
    However, the same emission reduction is expected to be achieved 
under the adjusted standard (95% TTV, 5% UTC) as would be achieved 
under the Subpart DD requirements (90% TTV, 10% EUTC). That is to say 
that, the requirement to fill 5% more cans with TTV offsets the 
relaxation of filling 5% of the total cans with UTC.

IV. Final Rulemaking Action

    The USEPA has determined that the VOM control requirements 
specified in AS 94-4 for Chase Products Company's Broadview facility's 
aerosol can filling lines constitute RACT and are fully enforceable. On 
this basis, the site-specific SIP revision request for Chase Products 
Company's Broadview facility is approved.
    This adjusted standard, AS 94-4, was adopted on May 16, 1996, and 
became effective on May 16, 1996, and supersedes the control 
requirements codified at 35 IAC, part 218, subpart DD, section 218.686 
as they apply to the Chase Products Company's Broadview, Illinois 
facility's aerosol can filling lines.
    The USEPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because 
USEPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no 
adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal 
Register publication, the USEPA is proposing to approve the SIP 
revision should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will 
be effective on August 8, 1997 unless, by July 9, 1997, adverse or 
critical comments are received.

[[Page 31343]]

    If the USEPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn 
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent rulemaking that 
will withdraw the final action. All public comments received will be 
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a 
proposed rule. The USEPA will not institute a second comment period on 
this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should 
do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is 
advised that this action will be effective on August 8, 1997.
    Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting, allowing 
or establishing a precedent for any future request for revision to any 
SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be considered 
separately in light of specific technical, economic, and environmental 
factors and in relation to relevant statutory and regulatory 
requirements.

V. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

    This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature 
by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the 
Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a 
July 10, 1995, memorandum from Mary D. Nichols, Assistant Administrator 
for Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.

B. Regulatory Flexibility

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 600 et seq., 
USEPA must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the 
impact of any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 
Secs. 603 and 604. Alternatively, USEPA may certify that the rule will 
not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit 
enterprises, and government entities with jurisdiction over populations 
of less than 50,000.
    SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Act 
do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements 
that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP 
approval does not impose any new requirements, the Administrator 
certifies that it does not have a significant impact on any small 
entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State 
relationship under the Act, preparation of a flexibility analysis would 
constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of the 
State action. The Clean Air Act forbids USEPA to base its actions 
concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. EPA., 427 U.S. 
246, 256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

C. Unfunded Mandates

    Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 
signed into law on March 22, 1995, USEPA must undertake various actions 
in association with any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal 
mandate that may result in estimated costs to state, local, or tribal 
governments in the aggregate; or to the private sector, of $100 million 
or more. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under 
state or local law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no 
additional costs to state, local, or tribal governments, or the private 
sector, result from this action.

D. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by August 8, 1997. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: May 22, 1997.
Elissa Speizman,
Acting Regional Administrator.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, title 
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

Subpart O--Illinois

    2. Section 52.720 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(133) to read 
as follows:


Sec. 52.720  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (133) On July 23, 1996, the Illinois Environmental Protection 
Agency submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan revision 
request for the Chase Products Company's Broadview (Cook County), 
Illinois facility located at 19th Street and Gardner Road, as part of 
the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago area. The resulting revision 
revises the control requirements codified at 35 Illinois Administrative 
Code Part 218 Subpart DD Section 218.686 as they apply to the Chase 
Products Company's Broadview facility.
    (i) Incorporation by reference. May 16, 1996, Opinion and Order of 
the Illinois Pollution Control Board AS 94-4, effective May 16, 1996.

[FR Doc. 97-14583 Filed 6-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P