[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12949-12951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-6539]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 94-CE-34-AD; Amendment 39-9967; AD 97-06-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Aircraft Company (Formerly
Beech Aircraft Corporation) Model 76 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes Airworthiness Directive (AD) 91-14-
14, which currently requires repetitively inspecting the main landing
gear (MLG) ``A'' frame assemblies for cracks on Raytheon Aircraft
Company (Raytheon) Model 76 airplanes (formerly referred to as Beech
Model 76 airplanes), and replacing any assembly found cracked. AD 91-
14-14 resulted from reports of fatigue cracks developing on the MLG
``A'' frame assemblies of the affected airplanes. Raytheon has
developed improved design MLG ``A'' frame assemblies, and the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) has determined that Model 76 airplanes
with an improved design ``A'' frame assembly installed on both the left
and right MLG should be exempt from AD 91-14-14. This action retains
the requirement of repetitively inspecting the MLG ``A'' frame
assemblies for cracks and replacing any cracked ``A'' frame assembly
only for those Model 76 airplanes that do not have the improved design
parts installed. The actions specified by this AD are intended to
prevent MLG failure because of a cracked ``A'' frame assembly, which
could result in loss of control of the airplane during landing
operations.
DATES: Effective May 16, 1997.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of May 16, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained
from the Raytheon Aircraft Company, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-
0085. This information may also be examined at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-
CE-34-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street,
NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
[[Page 12950]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Larry Engler, Aerospace Safety
Engineer, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport
Road, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316)
946-4122; facsimile (316) 946-4407.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Events Leading to the Issuance of the This AD
A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to Raytheon Model 76
airplanes (formerly referred to as Beech Model 76 airplanes) was
published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) on October 18, 1996 (61 FR 54368). The NPRM proposed to
supersede AD 91-14-14 with a new AD that would retain the requirement
of repetitively inspecting the MLG ``A'' frame assemblies for cracks
and replacing any part found cracked, but would exempt those airplanes
with both a P/N 105-810023-75 (left) and P/N 105-810023-76 (right) MLG
``A'' frame assembly installed. Accomplishment of the proposed
repetitive inspections as specified in the NPRM would be in accordance
with Raytheon Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 2361, Revision III, dated
June 1996.
The NPRM was the result of Raytheon developing improved design MLG
``A'' frame assemblies, and the FAA determining that Model 76 airplanes
with an improved design ``A'' frame assembly installed on both the left
and right MLG should be exempt from AD 91-14-14.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the
proposed rule or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
The FAA's Determination
After careful review of all available information related to the
subject presented above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the
public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for
minor editorial corrections. The FAA has determined that these minor
corrections will not change the meaning of the AD and will not add any
additional burden upon the public than was already proposed.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 437 airplanes in the U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 2 workhours per
airplane to accomplish the required action, and that the average labor
rate is approximately $60 an hour. Based on these figures, the total
cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $52,440.
These figures only take into account the cost of the required initial
inspection; repetitive inspection costs and costs for replacing any
cracked MLG ``A'' frame assemblies are not included in these figures.
The FAA has no way of determining how many airplanes will have
cracked MLG ``A'' frame assemblies or how many repetitive inspections
each affected owner/operator will incur over the life of the airplane.
The only difference between this AD and AD 91-14-14 is that this AD
exempts airplanes with the improved MLG ``A'' frame assemblies
installed. Therefore, the cost impact of this AD is less than that
already required by AD 91-14-14 because the FAA believes that some
airplanes will have the improved MLG ``A'' frame assemblies installed.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this
action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the
caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 91-14-14, Amendment 39-7055 (56 FR 29173, June 26, 1991), and by
adding a new AD to read as follows:
97-06-10 Raytheon Aircraft Company (formerly Beech Aircraft
Corporation): Amendment 39-9967; Docket No. 94-CE-34-AD. Supersedes
AD 91-14-14, Amendment 39-7055.
Applicability: Model 76 airplanes (serial numbers ME-1 through
ME-437), certificated in any category, that do not have both a part
number (P/N) 105-810023-75 (left) and P/N 105-810023-76 (right) main
landing gear (MLG) ``A'' frame assembly installed.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required initally within the next 50 hours time-in-
service (TIS) after the effective date of this AD, unless already
accomplished (compliance with AD 91-14-14), and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS .
To prevent MLG failure because of a cracked ``A'' frame
assembly, which could result in loss of control of the airplane
during landing operations, accomplish the following:
(a) Inspect, using both visual and dye penetrant methods, both
the left and right MLG ``A'' frame assemblies for cracks in
accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of Raytheon
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 2361, Revision III, dated June 1996.
Pay particular attention to the tips of the gussets and the small
corrosion treatment hole adjacent to the gusset.
(b) If any MLG ``A'' frame assembly is found cracked during any
inspection required by this AD, prior to further flight, replace the
assembly with one of the following in accordance with Chapter 32 of
the Raytheon Model 76 Maintenance Manual:
(1) A new MLG ``A'' frame assembly with the same P/N as that
found cracked. The 100-hour TIS repetitive inspection requirement
still applies when this design ``A'' frame is installed.
(2) A P/N 105-810023-75 (left) or P/N 105-810023-76 (right) main
MLG ``A'' frame
[[Page 12951]]
assembly, as applicable. Repetitive inspections are no longer
required on an MLG ``A'' frame assembly incorporating this design
configuration. Repetitive inspections are still required on an MLG
``A'' frame assembly if it does not incorporate this improved design
configuration.
(c) Installing both P/N 105-810023-75 (left) and P/N 105-810023-
76 (right) MLG ``A'' frame assemblies eliminates the repetitive
inspection requirement of this AD.
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be
approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita,
Kansas 67209. The request shall be forwarded through an appropriate
FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to
the Manager, Wichita ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Wichita ACO.
(f) The inspection required by this AD shall be done in
accordance with Raytheon Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 2361,
Revision III, dated June 1996. This incorporation by reference was
approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from the
Raytheon Aircraft Company, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085.
Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the
Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City,
Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(g) This amendment (39-9967) supersedes AD 91-14-14, Amendment
39-7055.
(h) This amendment (39-9967) becomes effective on May 16, 1997.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 6, 1997.
Michael Gallagher,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 97-6539 Filed 3-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U