[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 10221-10222] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 97-5498] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 53 [CC Docket No. 96-149; FCC 96-489] Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended; Final rule; Correction AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule; Correction. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This documents contains corrections to the final regulations which were published Tuesday, January 21, 1997 (62 FR 2927). The regulations related to special provisions relating to Bell Operating Companies. EFFECTIVE DATE: March 6, 1997. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Di Scipio (202) 418-1580. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The final regulations that are the subject of these corrections affect Bell Operating Companies. Need for correction As published, the final regulations contain errors which may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification. Accordingly, the publication on January 21, 1997 of the final regulations (FCC 97-52) is corrected as follows: 1. On page 2939, in the second column, the first indented paragraph is replaced by the following: We note that, under Computer II and Computer III, we have treated three categories of protocol processing services as basic services, rather than enhanced services. These categories include protocol processing: (1) involving communications between an end user and the network itself (e.g., for initiation, routing, and termination of calls) rather than between or among users; (2) in connection with the introduction of a new basic network technology (which requires protocol conversion to maintain compatibility with existing CPE); and (3) involving internetworking (conversions taking place solely within the carrier's network to facilitate provision of a basic network service, that result in no net conversion to the end user). We agree with PacTel that analogous treatment should be extended to these categories of protocol processing services under the statutory regime. Because the listed protocol processing services are information service capabilities used ``for the management, control, or operation of a telecommunications system or the management of a telecommunications service,'' they are excepted from the statutory definition of information service. These excepted protocol conversion services constitute telecommunications services, rather than information services, under the 1996 Act. 2. On page 2940, column 3, the first indented paragraph is replaced by the following: Remote Databases/Network Efficiency. BOCs may not provide interLATA services in their own regions, either over their own facilities or through resale, before receiving authorization from the Commission under section 271(d). Therefore, we conclude that BOCs may not provide interLATA information services, except for those designated as incidental interLATA services under section 271(g), in any of their in- region states prior to obtaining section 271 authorization. Section 271(g)(4) designates as an incidental interLATA service the interLATA provision by a BOC or its affiliate of ``a service that permits a customer that is located in one [[Page 10222]] LATA to retrieve stored information from, or file information for storage in, information storage facilities of such company that are located in another LATA.'' Because BOCs were able to provide incidental interLATA services immediately upon enactment of the 1996 Act, they may provide interLATA information services that fall within the scope of section 271(g)(4) without receiving section 271(d) authorization from the Commission. Since section 271(g)(4) services are not among the incidental interLATA services exempted from section 272 separate affiliate requirements, however, they must be provided in compliance with those requirements. To the extent that parties have argued in the record that centralized data storage and retrieval services that fall within section 271(g)(4) either are not interLATA information services, or are not subject to the section 272 separate affiliate requirements, we specifically reject these arguments. Federal Communications Commission. William F. Caton, Acting Secretary. [FR Doc. 97-5498 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P