[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 12 (Friday, January 17, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2581-2585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-1073]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[Region 2 Docket No. NJ25-1a-159, FRL-5662-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Reasonably
Available Control Technology for Oxides of Nitrogen for Specific
Sources in the State of New Jersey
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is announcing approval of twenty-two (22) revisions to
the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone submitted by the State of
New Jersey. These revisions consist of source-specific reasonably
available control technology (RACT) determinations for controlling
oxides of nitrogen (NOX) from various sources in New Jersey. The
intended effect of this action is to approve the source-specific RACT
determinations made by New Jersey in accordance with provisions of its
regulation, New Jersey Administrative Code (NJAC) 7:27-19. This action
is being taken in accordance with Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (the
Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on March 18, 1997, unless adverse or
critical comments are received by February 18, 1997. If the effective
date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to: Ronald Borsellino,
Chief, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2
Office, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866.
Copies of the State submittals are available at the following
addresses for inspection during normal business hours:
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch,
290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Air
Quality Management, Bureau of Air Pollution Control, 401 East State
Street, CN027, Trenton, New Jersey 08625
Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, Air Docket (6102), 401 M Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20460.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted Gardella, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-4249.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The air quality planning requirements for the reduction of NOX
emissions through RACT are set out in section 182(f) of the Act.
Section 182(f) requirements are described by EPA in a notice, ``State
Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the General
Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of Title I;
Proposed Rule,'' published November 25, 1992 (57 FR 55620). The
November 25, 1992 notice should be referred to for detailed information
on the NOX requirements. Additional guidance memoranda which have
been released subsequent to the NOX Supplement should also be
referred to.
The EPA has defined RACT as the lowest emission limitation that a
particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control
technology that is reasonably available considering technological and
economic feasibility (44 FR 53762, September 17, 1979).
Section 182(f) of the Act requires states within ozone
nonattainment areas classified moderate or above or areas within the
ozone transport region to apply the same requirements to major
stationary sources of NOX (``major'' as defined in section 302 and
section 182 (c), (d), and (e)) as are applied to major stationary
sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). For more information on
what constitutes a major source, see section 2 of the NOX
Supplement to the General Preamble.
Section 182(b)(2) requires submittal of RACT rules for major
stationary sources of VOC emissions (not covered by a pre-enactment
control technique guidelines (CTG) document or a post-enactment CTG
document) by November 15, 1992. There were no NOX CTGs issued
before enactment and EPA has not issued a CTG document for any NOX
sources since enactment. States, in their RACT rules, are expected to
require final installation of the actual NOX controls by May 31,
1995 from those sources for which installation by that date is
practicable.
States within the Northeast ozone transport region established by
section 184(a) should have revised their SIPs to include the RACT
measures by November 15, 1992. Because major sources in states in a
transport region are generally subject to at least the same level of
control as sources in moderate ozone nonattainment areas, EPA believes
that the schedule for implementing these RACT rules in the
[[Page 2582]]
ozone transport region should be consistent with the requirements of
section 182(b)(2) and were expected to require final installation of
the actual NOX controls by May 31, 1995 on those sources for which
installation by that date is practicable. Based on sections 182(f) and
184(b), New Jersey is required to apply the NOX RACT requirements
Statewide.
New Jersey's NOX RACT Regulation
On November 15, 1993, New Jersey submitted to EPA as a revision to
the SIP, Subchapter 19, ``Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution From
Oxides of Nitrogen'' of Chapter 27, Title 7 of the New Jersey
Administrative Code. Subchapter 19 contains the NOX RACT
requirements for New Jersey and has an effective date of December 20,
1993. New Jersey held public hearings on Subchapter 19 in March 1993
and adopted it on November 15, 1993. New Jersey submitted Subchapter 19
to EPA as a revision to the SIP on November 15, 1993. EPA found it to
be administratively and technically complete on December 29, 1993 and
proposed approval of Subchapter 19 on October 2, 1995 (60 FR 51379).
Final EPA action on Subchapter 19 is expected to be published in the
Federal Register soon.
C. Section 19.13--Facility Specific NOX Emission Limits
Section 19.13 of New Jersey's regulation establishes a procedure
for a case-by-case determination of what represents RACT for a
particular facility, item of equipment or source operation. This
procedure is applicable in two situations: (1) If the major NOX
facility contains any source operation or item of equipment of a
category not listed in section 19.2 and which has the potential to emit
more than 10 tons of NOX per year, except for non-utility boilers,
or (2) if the owner or operator of a source operation or item of
equipment of a category that is listed in section 19.2 seeks approval
of an alternative maximum allowable emission rate.
New Jersey's procedure requires the owners and/or operators of the
affected facility to submit either a NOX control plan if they are
not covered by specific emission limitations or a request for an
alternative maximum allowable emission rate if they are covered by
specific emission limitations. The owners/operators must include a
technical and economic feasibility analysis of the possible alternative
control measures. RACT determinations for an alternative maximum
allowable emission rate must consider alternative control strategies
(e.g., emissions averaging, seasonal fuel switching to natural gas, and
repowering) in addition to considering control technologies (e.g., low
NOX burners). In either case, Subchapter 19 provides for New
Jersey to establish emission limits based upon a RACT determination
specific to the facility. The resulting control plan or alternate
maximum allowable emission rate must be submitted to EPA for approval
as a SIP revision.
D. Analysis of State Submittals
The twenty-two (22) source specific SIP revisions were all adopted
by New Jersey at different times during 1994 and 1995 and were found by
EPA to be administratively and technically complete. Prior to adoption,
New Jersey published their proposed RACT determinations in local
newspapers and provided 30 days for public comment and an opportunity
to request a public hearing. New Jersey reviewed and responded to all
comments made. New Jersey determined that the proposed NOX control
plans and alternative maximum allowable emission rates from the owners
conform with the provisions of section 19.13. New Jersey has issued to
each owner a ``conditions of approval'' document incorporating approved
permit conditions which are fully enforceable by the State and which
contain conditions consistent with Subchapter 19. These ``conditions of
approval'' documents are identified in the ``Incorporation by
reference'' section at the end of this document.
EPA has determined that the NOX emission limits identified in
New Jersey's letters of approval (with attached ``conditions of
approval'' document) to the owners represent RACT for each source
identified in this document. The permit conditions include emission
limits, work practice standards, testing, monitoring, and
recordkeeping/reporting requirements. These permit conditions are
consistent with the NOX RACT requirements specified in Subchapter
19 and conform to EPA NOX RACT guidance. Therefore, EPA is
approving the twenty-two (22) source-specific SIP revisions submitted
by New Jersey dated May 26, 1995, November 8, 1995, January 10, 1996
and October 10, 1996 as identified in this document.
EPA's evaluation of each RACT submittal is detailed in a document
dated October 29, 1996, entitled ``Technical Support Document--NOX
RACT Source Specific SIP Revisions--State of New Jersey.'' A copy of
that document is available, upon request, from the EPA Regional Office
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document.
A summary of EPA's findings of each RACT submittal is provided in
the following sections and is organized into two groups: I. ``Facility-
Specific NOX Emission Limits'' in which a major NOX facility
has a source operation or item of equipment for which an emission limit
has not been established pursuant to the presumptive limits identified
in Subchapter 19, and II. ``Alternative NOX Emission Limits'' in
which an owner or operator of a source operation or item of equipment
of a category that is listed in section 19.2 seeks approval of a RACT
emission limit different from that which is established in Subchapter
19. This Notice takes action only on the permitted emission rates and
conditions of approval related to emissions of NOX; action is not
being taken on any other pollutants which may be permitted by New
Jersey with regard to these sources.
I. Facility-Specific NOX Emission Limits
1. Edgeboro Disposal, Inc.
Edgeboro Disposal, Inc. operates a solid waste landfill in East
Brunswick, Middlesex County, which generates landfill gas that is
disposed of by five flares. The facility's RACT analysis concluded, and
New Jersey agreed, that RACT is the current operation of the existing
flares. The facility-specific NOX emission limit is 0.08 pounds
NOX per million BTUs (lbs/MM BTU).
2. E.I. duPont DeNemours and Company, Inc.
E.I. duPont DeNemours and Company, Inc., operates a carbon
regeneration furnace located in Deepwater, Salem County. The facility's
RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is the use of
the previously installed low NOX burners (LNB), based on DuPont's
1994 updated Best Available Control Technology (BACT) analysis. The
facility-specific NOX emission limit is 18.6 pounds per hour (lbs/
hr).
3. Hoeganaes Corporation
The Hoeganaes Corporation, located in Riverton, Burlington County,
manufactures iron and steel powders. Its operations include an electric
arc furnace (EAF) for melting steel and a tunnel kiln for manufacturing
sponge iron. The facility's RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey
agreed, that RACT is regular maintenance of the EAF refractory which is
already standard practice at the facility. The facility-specific
NOX emission limit is 33.6 tons per year (TPY).
NOX emissions from the tunnel kiln are produced from 252
natural gas fired burners and from the combustion of coal
[[Page 2583]]
and coke in the process. The facility's RACT analysis concluded, and
New Jersey agreed, that RACT is burner adjustments to the tunnel kiln,
which is already a normal procedure to maintain proper combustion
control. The facility-specific NOX emission limit is 26.4 TPY.
4. Parsippany-Troy Hills Township Sewer Authority
Parsippany-Troy Hills Township Sewer Authority owns and operates
two multiple hearth type incinerators to burn sewage sludge from its
wastewater treatment plant located in Parsippany, Morris County. The
facility's RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is
seasonal natural gas combustion. The facility-specific NOX
emission limit is 21 lbs/hr for each incinerator. The State may
establish a lower facility NOX emission limit based on compliance
stack test results after the fuel switch.
5. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation operates a small scale trash
fired boiler energy recovery system located in East Hanover, Morris
County. The facility's RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed,
that RACT is the previously installed controlled air combustion system.
The facility-specific NOX emission limit is 3.0 lbs/hr.
6. Griffin Pipe Products Company
Griffin Pipe Products Company produces pipe from scrap steel and
operates an iron melting cupola and an annealing furnace in Florence,
Burlington County. NOX emissions from the facility are a result of
the combustion of coke in the iron melting cupola and natural gas in
the annealing furnace. For the cupola, the facility's RACT analysis
concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is the continued use of low
excess air and oxygen enrichment technologies. The facility-specific
NOX emission limit is 0.20 lbs/MM BTU. In addition, the conditions
of approval include limiting the cupola operation to 2600 hours per
year. For the annealing furnace, the facility's RACT analysis
concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is annual adjustment to the
furnace combustion process. The facility-specific NOX emission
limit is 0.15 lbs/MM BTU. Also, the conditions of approval include
limiting the annual fuel consumption of the furnace to 200 million
standard cubic feet (MMSCF) of natural gas.
7. United States Pipe and Foundry Company
United States Pipe and Foundry Company operates two cupola iron
melting furnaces and two annealing ovens in Burlington, Burlington
County. NOX emissions are the result of coke combustion in the
cupola and natural gas in the annealing oven. For the cupolas, the
facility's RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is
the continued use of oxygen enrichment and preheated blast air. The
facility-specific NOX emission limit is 0.20 lbs/MM BTU. For the
annealing ovens, the facility's RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey
agreed, that RACT is annual adjustment to the combustion process. The
facility-specific NOX emission limit is 0.14 lbs/MM BTU.
8. Johnson Matthey Incorporated
Johnson Matthey Incorporated operates a three-chamber natural gas
fired ignition recovery furnace system in West Deptford, Gloucester
County. The facility's RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed,
that RACT is the installation of LNBs. The facility-specific NOX
emission limit is 7.1 lbs/hr.
9. E.I. duPont DeNemours and Company, Inc.
E.I. duPont DeNemours and Company, Inc. owns and operates a
hazardous waste incinerator in Deepwater, Salem County. The facility's
RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is the
implementation of Selective Non Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) including
ammonia injection, based on a 1994 BACT determination. The facility-
specific NOX emission limit is 10.6 lbs/hr (0.20 lbs/MM BTU).
10. Rollins Environmental Services (NJ), Inc.
Rollins Environmental Services (NJ), Inc. owns and operates a
commercial hazardous waste incinerator in Bridgeport, Gloucester County
to process organic wastes. The facility's RACT analysis concluded, and
New Jersey agreed, that RACT is the modification of the existing
burners. The facility-specific NOX emission limit is 75 lbs/hr.
11. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (3M) operates one rotary
kiln and two dryers in Belle Mead, Somerset County. The facility's RACT
analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is the
installation of LNBs. In addition, the conditions of approval include
requirements that only natural gas will be combusted as the primary
fuel and No. 2 fuel oil will be used only during natural gas
curtailment. The facility-specific NOX emission limits while
combusting natural gas are 5.7 lbs/hr and 1.6 lbs/hr for the kiln and
each dryer, respectively.
12. American Ref-Fuel Company
The American Ref-Fuel Company owns and operates the three mass
burning water wall incinerators at the Essex County Resource Recovery
Facility in Newark, Essex County. The facility's RACT analysis
concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is the installation of SNCR
technology utilizing ammonia injection, based on a 1993 BACT analysis.
The facility-specific NOX emission limit is 95 lbs/hr/unit, with a
concentration limit of 174 parts per million (ppm), based on a 3-hour
average.
13. Union County Utilities Authority
The Union County Utilities Authority owns and operates the three
mass burning water wall incinerators at the Union County Resource
Recovery Facility in Rahway, Union County. The facility's RACT analysis
concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is the installation of SNCR
technology with ammonia injection, based on a 1989 BACT analysis. The
facility-specific NOX emission limit is 80 lbs/hr/unit, with a
concentration limit of 225 ppm on a 3-hour basis.
14. General Motors Corporation
General Motors (GM), located in Linden, Union County, owns and
operates a Topcoat autobody coating system which has fifty natural gas
burners. The facility's RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed,
that RACT is the existing practice of limiting the Topcoat system's
fuel use to 591.1 MMSCF of natural gas per year and annual combustion
adjustments to the burners. The facility-specific NOX emission
limit is 41.4 TPY (0.14 lbs/MM BTU) and the Topcoat system production
is limited to operate 5094 hours per year.
II. Alternative NOX Emission Limit
A summary of EPA's analysis of each source facility granted an
alternative NOX emission limit by New Jersey is as follows.
15. Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G)
PSE&G operates Hudson Unit Number 2 which is a coal-fired, dry
bottom utility boiler in Jersey City, Hudson County. The facility's
RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is the use of
LNB in combination with Overfire Air (LNB/OFA). The
[[Page 2584]]
alternative NOX emission limits are 0.85 lbs/MM BTU for coal and
0.60 lbs/MM BTU for the combustion of natural gas or number 6 fuel oil.
These emission limits may be further reduced by New Jersey based upon
results of optimization tests with the LNB/OFA installation.
16. General Motors Corporation
GM operates a tangentially oil-fired boiler (Number 4) at its motor
vehicle parts plant in Trenton, Mercer County. The facility's RACT
analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is annual
adjustments to the combustion process. The alternative NOX
emission limit is 0.45 lbs/MM BTU. The conditions of approval include
limiting operation to no more than 1315 hours per year and ceasing
boiler operation after May 31, 2005.
17. International Flavors and Fragrances
International Flavors and Fragrances owns and operates a backup
gas-fired boiler (Number 5) in Union Beach, Monmouth County. The
facility's RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is
biannual combustion process adjustments and an operation limit to 1440
hours annually. The alternative NOx emission limit is 0.18 lbs/MM
BTU during natural gas combustion and 0.255 lbs/MM BTU during No. 2
fuel oil combustion. Number 6 fuel oil will no longer be used for the
boiler.
18. Algonquin Gas Transmission Company
Algonquin Gas Transmission Company operates two natural gas fired,
simple cycle combustion turbines in Hanover Township, Morris County.
The facility's RACT analysis concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that
RACT is annual adjustments to the combustion process. The alternative
NOx emission limit for each turbine shall be 0.345 lbs/MM BTU.
19. Hoffmann-La Roche Incorporated
Hoffmann-La Roche Incorporated, located in Nutley, Essex County,
owns and operates a cogeneration facility with three units consisting
of combined cycle combustion turbines and heat recovery steam
generators with supplemental firing. The facility's RACT analysis
concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is annual adjustment to the
combustion process on the duct burners installed on each of the three
turbines. The alternative NOx emission limit for each turbine is
0.34 lbs/MM BTU during natural gas combustion. Each turbine is also
permitted to use kerosene as a backup fuel for no more than 500 hours
in a calendar year.
20. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation
Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation operates three 2050
horsepower internal combustion engines at the Linden Compressor Station
in Union County and four 1100 horsepower engines at the Lambertville
Compressor Station in Hunterdon County. The facility's RACT analysis
concluded, and New Jersey agreed, that RACT is the use of electronic
ignition controls on each of the Lambertville engines and the use of
electronic ignition controls combined with installation of equipment to
automatically control the air to fuel ratio on the Linden engines. The
alternative NOx emission limit is 8.26 grams per horsepower-hour
(g/hp-hr) for each Linden engine and 7.22 g/hp-hr for each Lambertville
engine. After optimization of controls, the NOx emission limits
will be evaluated and lower alternative emission limits may be
established.
Final Action
EPA is approving the permitted conditions described above as RACT
for the control of NOx emissions from the sources identified in
the twenty-two source-specific SIP revisions.
The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates
no adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal
Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision
should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be
effective March 18, 1997, unless, by February 18, 1997 adverse or
critical comments are received.
If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a
proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should
do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is
advised that this action will be effective March 18, 1997.
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for
revision to any SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be
considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and
environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and
regulatory requirements.
Administrative Requirements
Executive Order 12866
This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature
by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the
Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a
July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted this regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Act
do not create any new requirements but simply approve requirements that
the state is already imposing. Moreover, this action does not involve
generally applicable requirements, but specific requirements for each
facility which both the source owner and the State have determined to
be economically and technologically reasonable. This action only
affects the sources which have requested the SIP revision and which are
not small entities. Therefore, EPA certifies that this approval action
does not have a significant impact on small entities.
Unfunded Mandates
Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a federal mandate that may result in estimated
annual costs to state, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate;
or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small governments that
[[Page 2585]]
may be significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not
include a federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of
$100 million or more to either state, local, or tribal governments in
the aggregate, or to the private sector. This federal action approves
pre-existing requirements under state or local law, and imposes no new
federal requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to state, local,
or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this
action.
Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the
General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's
Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 18, 1997. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 28, 1996.
William J. Muszynski,
Acting Regional Administrator.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart FF--New Jersey
2. Section 52.1570 is amended by adding new paragraph (c)(59) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.1570 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
* * * * *
(59) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection on May 26, 1995,
November 8, 1995, January 10, 1996 and October 10, 1996.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Conditions of Approval Documents (COAD):
The following facilities have been issued conditions of approval
documents by New Jersey:
(1) Edgeboro Disposal's landfill gas flares, Middlesex County, NJ
COAD approval dated April 13, 1995, revised October 19, 1995 (effective
November 6, 1995).
(2) E.I. duPont DeNemours and Co.'s carbon regeneration furnace,
Salem County, NJ COAD approval dated June 7, 1995.
(3) Hoeganaes Corp.'s electric arc furnace and tunnel kiln,
Burlington County, NJ COAD approval dated February 3, 1995.
(4) E.I. duPont DeNemours and Co.'s hazardous waste incinerator,
Salem County, NJ COAD approval dated July 7, 1995.
(5) Rollins Environmental Services' hazardous waste incinerator,
Gloucester County, NJ COAD approval dated May 25, 1995.
(6) American Ref-Fuel's Municipal Waste Incinerator, Essex County,
NJ NOX RACT approval dated February 6, 1995.
(7) Union County Utilities Authority's Municipal Waste Incinerator,
Union County; NJ NOX RACT approval dated May 10, 1994 with an
attached permit to construct, operate, and a PSD permit dated December
29, 1989.
(8) PSE&G's Hudson Station Unit No. 2 utility boiler, Hudson
County, NJ COAD approval dated May 9, 1995.
(9) Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.'s simple cycle combustion
turbines, Morris County, NJ COAD approval dated March 31, 1995.
(10) Hoffmann-La Roche's combined cycle combustion turbines, Essex
County, NJ COAD approval dated May 8, 1995.
(11) International Flavors and Fragrances' non-utility boiler
Number 5, Monmouth County, NJ COAD approval dated June 9, 1995.
(12) Parsippany-Troy Hills Township Sewer Authority's sewage sludge
incinerators, Morris County, NJ COAD approval dated October 13, 1995.
(13) Johnson Matthey's multi-chamber metals recovery furnace,
Gloucester County, NJ COAD approval dated June 13, 1995.
(14) 3M Company's rotary kiln and dryers, Somerset County, NJ COAD
approval dated May 4, 1995.
(15) Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation's trash fired boiler,
Morris County, NJ COAD approval dated March 23, 1995.
(16) General Motors Corporation's non-utility boiler (No.4), Mercer
County, NJ COAD approval dated June 22, 1995.
(17) General Motors Corporation's Topcoat system, Union County, NJ
COAD approval dated November 6, 1995.
(18) United States Pipe and Foundry Company's cupolas and annealing
ovens (No. 2 and No. 3), Burlington County, NJ COAD approval dated
October 16, 1995.
(19) Griffin Pipe Products Company's cupola and annealing furnace,
Burlington County, NJ COAD approval dated December 14, 1995.
(20) Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation's internal combustion
engines, Hunterdon County, NJ COAD approval dated May 9, 1995.
(21) Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation's internal combustion
engines, Union County, NJ COAD approval dated May 9, 1995.
(ii) Additional information--Documentation and information to
support NOx RACT facility-specific emission limits or alternative
emission limits in four letters addressed to Regional Administrator
Jeanne M. Fox from New Jersey Commissioner Robert C. Shinn, Jr. dated:
(A) May 26, 1995 for two SIP revisions;
(B) November 8, 1995 for eight SIP revisions;
(C) January 10, 1996 for ten SIP revisions; and
(D) October 10, 1996 for two SIP revisions.
[FR Doc. 97-1073 Filed 1-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P