[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 218 (Friday, November 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57904-57905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-28788]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) issued during the period of October,
1996.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222
of the Act must be met.
(1) that a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision thereof, have become
totally or partially separated,
(2) that sales or production, or both, of the firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely, and
(3) that increases of imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles produced by the firm or appropriate
subdivision have contributed importantly to the separations, or threat
thereof, and to the absolute decline in sales or production.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In each of the following cases the investigation revealed that
criterion (3) has not been met. A survey of customers indicated that
increased imports did not contribute importantly to worker separations
at the firm.
TA-W-32,633; Holiday Hosiery, Inc., Hudson, NC
TA-W-32,744; UNIFI, Inc., Spun Yarns Div., Mount Pleasant, NC
TA-W-32,693; Decatech Innovations (Formerly Marion Manufacturing),
Marion, NC
TA-W-32,641; Robinson Manufacturing Co., Oxford, ME
TA-W-32,641A; Kezar Falls Woolen Co., Kezar Falls, ME
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
TA-W-32,666; Speco Corp., Springfield, OH
TA-W-32,694; Amtrol/Clayton Mark, Inc., Rogers, AR
TA-W-32,725; Wea Manufacturing, Inc., Olyphant, PA
TA-W-32,709; Penn Mould Industries, Inc., Washington, PA
TA-W-32,821; W.R. Grace & Co--Conn, Grace Construction Products, Fire
Protection, New Castle, PA
Increased imports did not contribute importantly to worker
separations at the firm.
TA-W-32,732; Hotsy Equipment Co., Boyertown, PA
TA-W-32,647 &; Erling Riis Research Laboratory, Mobile, AL and Bel Air
Complex, Mobile, AL
TA-W-32,606; Bonaventure Textiles USA, New York, NY
The workers firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-32,685; W.W. Henry Co., South River, NJ
TA-W-32,671; Dico Tire, Inc., Clinton, TN
The investigation revealed that criteria (2) and criteria (3) have
not been met. Sales or production did not decline during the relevant
period as required for certification. Increases of imports of articles
like or directly competitive with articles produced by the firm or
appropriate subdivision have not contributed importantly to the
separations or threat thereof, and the absolute decline in sales or
production.
TA-W-32,716; Tetra/Second Nature, A Div. of Warner-Lambert Co.,
Oakland, NJ
The investigation revealed that criteria (1) and criteria (2) have
not been met. A significant number or proportion of the workers did not
become totally or partially separated as required for certification.
Sales or production did not decline during the relevant period as
required for certification.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name and location for each determination references the
impact date for all workers for such determination.
TA-W-32,673; Precision Machining and Polishing, Milwaukee, WI: August
12, 1995
TA-W-32,697; Creative Apparel, Inc., Pollstown, PA and Primrose, PA:
August 9, 1995
TA-W-32,728; ASARCO Inc., TMD New Market Mill and Mine, Strawberry
Plains, TN: August 23, 1995
TA-W-32,731; Douglas Randall, Inc. A/K/a Crydom Corp., A Subsidiary of
Silicon Power Corp., Pawcatuck, CT: August 23, 1995
TA-W-32,812; Petersburg Garment Co., Petersburg, WV: September 27, 1995
TA-W-32,783; Hudson RCI, Temecula, CA: September 11, 1995
[[Page 57905]]
TA-W-32,687; William Rifkin & Sons, Philadelphia, PA: August 14, 1995
TA-W-32,680; Florence Eiseman, Inc., Fon Du Lac, WI: August 7, 1995
TA-W-32,678; Modular Devices, Inc., Torrance, CA: August 12, 1995
TA-W-32,668; Vanco Industries, Inc., Eutaw, AL: July 29, 1995
TA-W-32,688; North American Refractories Co., Womelsdorf, PA: August
13, 1995
TA-W-32,663; Cameron Converting, Inc., Elizabethtown, NC: July 16, 1995
TA-W-32,723; Foseco, Inc., Mt. Braddock, PA: August 26, 1995
TA-W-32,700; Summit Technology, Inc., Waltham, MA: August 15, 1995
TA-W-32,657 & A; Forstmann & Co., Inc., New York, NY and Carpini USA
Division of Forstmann & Co., Inc., New York, NY; August 5, 1995
TA-W-32,696; Hodge Apparel, Inc., Harrisville, WV: August 6, 1995
TA-W-32,674; Artistic Creations, Roselle, NJ: July 20, 1995
TA-W-32,645; Elkem Metals Co., Niagara Falls, NY: August 6, 1995
TA-W-32,642; Springs/Dundee Bath Fashions Group, Dadeville, AL: July
30, 1995
TA-W-32,653; Premier Edible Oils Corp., Portland, OR: August 5, 1995
TA-W-32,652; The Chas. H. Lilly Co., Portland, OR: July 29, 1995
TA-W-32,650; Wilson Automation Div. of Newcor, Inc., Warren, MI: August
2, 1995
TA-W-32,724; Camco Products & Services, Anchorage, AK: August 22, 1995
TA-W-32,626; Devro-Teepak, Inc., Columbia, SC and Danville, IL: July
26, 1995
TA-W-32,677; Jete' LLC, Jump Apparel Co., New York, NY: August 6, 1995
TA-W-32,734 & A; Tell City Chair Co., Tell City, IN & Leitchfield, KY:
August 20, 1995
TA-W-32,714 & A; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Topeka, KS and Goodyear
Tire & Rubber Co., Logistic Center, Topeka, KS: August 28, 1995
Also, pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade
Agreement Implementation Act (P.L. 103-182) concerning transitional
adjustment assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA) and in accordance
with Section 250(a) Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act
as amended, the Department of Labor presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for NAFTA-TAA issued
during the month of October, 1996.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a
certification of eligibility to apply for NAFTA-TAA the following group
eligibility requirements of Section 250 of the Trade Act must be met:
(1) that a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision thereof, (including
workers in any agricultural firm or appropriate subdivision thereof)
have become totally or partially separated from employment and either--
(2) that sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely,
(3) that imports from Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly
competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have
increased, and that the increases in imports contributed importantly to
such workers' separations or threat of separation and to the decline in
sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
(4) that there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm
or subdivision to Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by the firm of
subdivision.
Negative Determinations NAFTA-TAA
In each of the following cases the investigation revealed that
criteria (3) and (4) were not met. Imports from Canada or Mexico did
not contribute importantly to workers' separations. There was no shift
in production from the subject firm to Canada or Mexico during the
relevant period.
NAFTA-TAA-01232; Hoskins Manufacturing Co., New Paris, IN
NAFTA-TAA-01221; UNIFI, Inc., Spun Yarns Div., Mount Pleasant, NC
NAFTA-TAA-01227; Ozark Quilt Supply, Winona, MO
NAFTA-TAA-01220; Trinity Industries, New Ondon, MN Washington
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
NAFTA-TAA-01234; Philip Environmental, Inc., Georgetown Facility,
Seattle, WA
The investigation revealed that the workers of the subject firm did
not produce an article within the meaning of Section 250(a) of the
Trade Act, as amended.
Affirmative Determinations NAFTA-TAA
The following certifications have been issued; the date following
the company name & location for each determination references the
impact date for all workers for such determination.
NAFTA-TAA-01246; Hudson RCI, Temecula, CA: September 17, 1995
NAFTA-TAA-01269; Syborn International, d/b/a Kerr Manufacturing,
Massena, NY: October 8, 1995
NAFTA-TAA-01198; Modular Devices, Inc., Torrance, CA: August 12, 1995
NAFTA-TAA-01203; Rohm and Haas Co., Philadelphia, PA: August 7, 1995
NAFTA-TAA-01230; Pendleton Wollen Mills, Inc., Portland, OR: August 26,
1995
NAFTA-TAA-01249; R & G Sloane Manufacturing Co., Inc., Little Rock, AR:
September 30, 1995
NAFTA-TAA-01181; Premier Edible Oils Corp., Portland, OR: August 9,
1995
NAFTA-TAA-01257; Aalfs Manufacturing, Inc., Texarkana, AR: September
18, 1995
NAFTA-TAA-01256; Johnson and Johnson, Personal Products Co., North
Little Rock, AR: March 3, 1997
NAFTA-TAA-01229; Amana Refrigeration, Inc., Delaware, OH: August 27,
1995
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the month of October, 1996. Copies of these determinations are
available for inspection in Room C-4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal
business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above
address.
Dated: October 28, 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy & Reemployment Services, Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-28788 Filed 11-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M