[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 208 (Friday, October 25, 1996)] [Notices] [Pages 55289-55291] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 96-27419] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Hearings and Appeals Notice of Issuance of Decisions and Orders During the Week of September 9 Through September 13, 1996 During the week of September 9 through September 13, 1996, the decisions and orders summarized below were issued with respect to appeals, applications, petitions, or other requests filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. The following summary also contains a list of submissions that were dismissed by the Office of Hearings and Appeals. Copies of the full text of these decisions and orders are available in the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Room 1E-234, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585-0107, Monday through Friday, between the hours of 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., except federal holidays. They are also available in Energy Management: Federal Energy Guidelines, a commercially published loose leaf reporter system. Some decisions and orders are available on the Office of Hearings and Appeals World Wide Web site at http://www.oha.doe.gov. [[Page 55290]] Dated: October 17, 1996. George B. Breznay, Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals. Decision List No. 989 Appeals Cindy David, 9/12/96, VFA-0204 Cindy David filed an Appeal from a partial denial by the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) of a Request for Information which Ms. David had submitted under the Freedom of Information Act. In considering the Appeal, the DOE found that material which WAPA withheld by claiming the protection of Exemption 4, overhead expense and general and administrative expense data, was indeed exempt from disclosure as proprietary commercial information. The DOE concluded that release of the withheld material would cause competitive harm to the submitter, Salazar Associates International. Accordingly, the Appeal was denied. Dennis J. McQuade, 9/9/96, VFA-0200 Dennis J. McQuade filed an Appeal from a determination by the DOE's Oak Ridge Operations Office (OR), which denied a request for information he had filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). OR stated that it conducted a search of its files which included the Office of Assistant Manager for Defense Programs, the Quality and Reliability Division, the Safeguards and Security Division, and the Office of Chief Counsel. OR stated that the only record which could be located was a record which responded to item 2 of Mr. McQuade's request. OR provided that record to Mr. McQuade, but stated that no documents could be located in response to item 1 and item 3 of his request. The Appeal challenged the adequacy of the search conducted by OR. In considering the Appeal, the DOE found that OR conducted an adequate search which was reasonably calculated to discover documents responsive to Mr. McQuade's Request. Accordingly, the Appeal was denied. Diane C. Larson, 9/9/96, VFA-0199 Diane C. Larson filed an Appeal of a determination issued to her in response to a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the Privacy Act. In the determination, the DOE's Richland Operations Office (DOE/RL) stated that most of the requested documents were the property of Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) and were not agency records, not subject to the FOIA under 10 C.F.R. Sec. 1004.3(e), and not subject to the Privacy Act. DOE/RL also released some documents which were under the control of the DOE, but redacted the names and lengths of service of WHC employees, under Exemption 6 of the FOIA. In considering the Appeal, the DOE first determined that WHC was not an agency and therefore not subject to the Privacy Act. The DOE also found that the requested documents were not agency records, and that those documents belonged under contract to WHC. The DOE then concluded that Exemption 6 did not protect the material withheld by DOE/RL. Neither length of service nor general age are the type of personal information usually protected by Exemption 6. Accordingly, the DOE granted the Appeal in part and remanded the matter to DOE/RL for further action. Mary Towles Taylor, 9/9/96, VFA-0201 Mary Towles Taylor filed an Appeal from a determination by the DOE's Freedom of Information Office that no records exist which would indicate whether her father had been exposed to radiation during his employment at the Oak Ridge Operations Office. After considering the Appeal, the DOE remanded the matter so that an additional search for responsive documents could be conducted. Accordingly, the Appeal was granted in part. National Security Archive, 9/13/96, VFA-0033 The National Security Archive filed an Appeal from a denial by the DOE's Oakland Operations Office of a request for information that it filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). In considering the information that was withheld, pursuant to a review by the Director of Security Affairs, as National Security Information and Restricted Data under Exemptions 1 and 3 of the FOIA, the DOE determined that all of the material previously identified as withholdable must continue to be withheld. However, more precise deletions now permit additional portions of the requested information to be released. Accordingly, the Appeal was granted in part. US Solar Roof, 9/12/96, VFA-0203 US Solar Roof (USSR) filed an Appeal from a determination by the DOE's Golden Field Office GFO (Manager). In that determination, the GFO denied a request for information filed by USSR under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). In considering the Appeal, the DOE confirmed that the GFO followed procedures reasonably calculated to uncover the requested information. Accordingly, the Appeal was denied. William Donnelly, 9/11/96, VFA-0202 The DOE issued a Decision and Order denying a Freedom of Information Act Appeal that was filed by William Donnelly. In his Appeal, Mr. Donnelly contested the adequacy of the search for responsive documents performed by the DOE's Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center. In the Decision, the DOE found that the search for responsive documents was adequate. Personnel Security Hearing Oak Ridge Operations Office, 9/11/96, VSO-0096 An Office of Hearings and Appeals Hearing Officer issued an opinion under 10 C.F.R. Part 710 concerning the eligibility of an individual for access authorization. After considering the testimony at the hearing convened at the request of the individual and all other information in the record, the Hearing Officer found that the individual (i) deliberately omitted significant information from his Questionnaire for Sensitive Positions, which is derogatory information under 10 C.F.R. Sec. 710.8(f), (ii) been diagnosed by a board-certified psychiatrist as suffering from alcohol abuse, which is derogatory information under 10 C.F.R. Sec. 710.8(j), and (iii) been arrested on a variety of charges, including three recent arrests for driving while under the influence of alcohol, and had a number of longstanding delinquent financial obligations, all of which tend to show that the individual is not reliable, and thus constitute derogatory information under 10 C.F.R. Sec. 710.8(l). The Hearing Officer further found that the individual failed to present sufficient evidence to mitigate the derogatory information. Accordingly, the Hearing Officer recommended that the individual not receive access authorization. Refund Applications The Office of Hearings and Appeals issued the following Decisions and Orders concerning refund applications, which are not summarized. Copies of the full texts of the Decisions and Orders are available in the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals. BUCKEYE COOP ELEVATOR CO., ET AL......................... RG272-4 09/12/96 CITY OF ST. PAUL......................................... RJ272-00021 09/09/96 CLIFFORD COHEN, ET AL.................................... RF272-85021 09/11/96 [[Page 55291]] CRUDE OIL SUPPLE REF DIST................................ RB272-00086 09/12/96 GENERAL MOTOR LINES, INC................................. RF272-97362 09/12/96 GULF OIL CORPORATION/LEO & GLEN COMBS, INC............... RF300-21834 09/09/96 S.T. WOOTEN CONSTRUCTION CO.............................. RR272-238 09/11/96 SPIVEY, INC.............................................. RC272-350 09/09/96 SPIVEY, INC.............................................. RC272-351 Dismissals The following submissions were dismissed: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name Case No. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BLUE RIDGE TRUSS & SUPPLY, INC............... RG272-736 E.D. FEE TRANSFER, INC....................... RF272-95260 KEWAUNEE COOPERATIVE......................... RG272-695 MIKE HILL FARMS, INC......................... RK272-820 NATIONAL ENTERPRISES......................... RK272-854 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [FR Doc. 96-27419 Filed 10-24-96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P