[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 204 (Monday, October 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54640-54641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-26865]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-776-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare an 
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Southwest Missouri Expansion 
Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues

October 15, 1996.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or 
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will 
discuss the environmental impacts of the construction and operation of 
the facilities proposed in the Southwest Missouri Expansion Project.\1\ 
This EA will be used by the Commission in its decision-making process 
to determine whether an environmental impact statement is necessary and 
whether to approve the project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Williams Natural Gas Company's application was filed with 
the Commission under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 
of the Commission's regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of the Proposed Project

    Williams Natural Gas Company (WNG) wants to expand the capacity of 
its facilities in Kansas and Missouri to transport an additional 20,316 
dekatherms per day (Dth/d) of natural gas to five customers. WNG seeks 
authority to construct and operate:
     A 3.2-mile-long extension of the Springfield Loop Line HS 
in Christian County, Missouri (looping its 16-inch-diameter Line HQ); 
and
     A 9.5-mile-long extension of the Southern Trunk Loop Line 
FR in Montgomery and Labette Counties, Kansas (looping its 20-inch-
diameter Line F).
    The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix 
1.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being 
printed in the Federal Register. Copies are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, or call (202) 208-1371. 
Copies of the appendices were sent to all those receiving this 
notice in the mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction of the proposed facilities would require about 154 
acres of land. Following construction, land would be restored and about 
38 acres would be maintained as new permanent right-of-way along with 
about 63 acres of existing permanent right-of-way that was used during 
construction. The remaining 53 acres of land would revert to its former 
use.

The EA Process

    The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the 
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could 
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a 
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us 
to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals. 
We call this ``scoping''. The main goal of the scoping process is to 
focus the analysis in the EA on the important environmental issues. By 
this Notice of Intent, the Commission requests public comments on the 
scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All comments received 
are considered during the preparation of the EA. State and local 
government representatives are encouraged to notify their constituents 
of this proposed action and encourage them to comment on their areas of 
concern.
    The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the 
construction and operation of the proposed project under these general 
headings:
     Geology and soils.
     Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands.
     Vegetation and wildlife.
     Endangered and threatened species.
     Public safety.
     Land use.
     Cultural resources.
     Air quality and noise.
     Hazardous waste.
    We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project 
or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen 
or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
    Our independent analysis of the issues will be in the EA. Depending 
on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA may be 
published and mailed to Federal, state, and local agencies, public 
interest groups, interested individuals, affected landowners, 
newspapers, libraries, and the Commission's official service list for 
this proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA 
is published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we 
recommend that the Commission approve or not approve the project.

Currently Identified Environmental Issues

    We have already identified several issues that we think deserve 
attention

[[Page 54641]]

based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and the 
environmental information provided by WNG. This preliminary list of 
issues may be changed based on your comments and our analysis.
     Two perennial and 13 intermittent streams would be 
crossed.
     At least one perennial stream, the Verdigris River, would 
be crossed by directional drilling.
     Two wetlands would be crossed by the project.
     Three domestic water wells would be located within 200 
feet of the construction right-of-way.
     One residence would be located within 50 feet of the 
construction right-of-way.
     Additional temporary workspace may be needed at stream, 
road, and utility crossings and for equipment/materials storage.

Public Participation

    You can make a difference by sending a letter addressing your 
specific comments or concerns about the project. You should focus on 
the potential environmental effects of the proposal, alternatives to 
the proposal (including alternative routes), and measures to avoid or 
lessen environmental impact. The more specific your comments, the more 
useful they will be. Please follow the instructions below to ensure 
that your comments are received and properly recorded:
     Address your letter to: Lois Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., N.E., Washington, DC 
20426.
     Reference Docket No. CP96-776-000;
     Send a copy of your letter to: Ms. Jennifer Goggin, EA 
Project Manager, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., 
N.E., PR-11.2, Washington, DC 20426; and
     Mail your comments so that they will be received in 
Washington, DC on or before November 14, 1996.
    If you wish to receive a copy of the EA, you should request one 
from Ms. Goggin at the above address.

Becoming an Intervenor

    In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want 
to become an official party to the proceeding or become an 
``intervenor''. Among other things, intervenors have the right to 
receive copies of case-related Commission documents and filings by 
other intervenors. Likewise, each intervenor must provide copies of its 
filings to all other parties. If you want to become an intervenor you 
must file a motion to intervene according to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) (see 
appendix 2).
    The date for filing timely motions to intervene in this proceeding 
has passed. Therefore, parties now seeking to file late interventions 
must show good cause, as required by section 385.214(b)(3), why this 
time limitation should be waived. Environmental issues have been viewed 
as good cause for late intervention.
    You do not need intervenor status to have your scoping comments 
considered.
    Additional information about the proposed project is available from 
Ms. Jennifer Goggin, EA Project Manager, at (202) 208-2226.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-26865 Filed 10-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M