[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 8, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52865-52870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-25469]
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 8, 1996 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 52865]]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 60
[ND7-1-6882a; FRL-5618-8]
Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation
Plan for North Dakota; Revisions to the Air Pollution Control Rules;
Delegation of Authority for Colorado Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule and delegation of authority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA approves the State implementation plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of North Dakota with a letter dated December 21,
1994. The submittal addressed revisions to SIP Chapter 2, regarding
delegatable authorities and asbestos law revisions, and revisions to
air pollution control rules, regarding general provisions; ambient air
quality standards; new source performance standards (NSPS); and
national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPs). The
submittal also addressed the following issues which were reviewed
separately: Revisions to the Title V permit to operate program;
revisions to the Acid Rain program; and emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants for source categories (MACT standards).
In addition, EPA is providing notice that it granted delegation of
authority to Colorado on February 15, 1996 to implement and enforce
several NSPS adopted by the State.
DATES: This final rule is effective on December 9, 1996 unless comments
are received in writing on or before November 7, 1996. If the effective
date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the Federal
Register. The Delegation of Authority for the State of Colorado became
effective on February 15, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the State's submittal and other information are
available for inspection during normal business hours at the following
locations: Air Program, Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII,
999 18th Street, suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2405; North Dakota
State Department of Health and Consolidated Laboratories, Environmental
Health Section, 1200 Missouri Avenue, Bismarck, North Dakota, 58502-
5520; and The Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, 401 M
Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Platt, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region VIII, (303) 312-6449.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Analysis of North Dakota's Submission
The State submitted various revisions to its air pollution control
rules with a letter to EPA dated December 21, 1994. These revisions
were necessary to make the rules consistent with Federal requirements.
A. Procedural Background
The Act requires States to observe certain procedural requirements
in developing implementation plans and plan revisions for submission to
EPA. Section 110(a)(2) of the Act provides that each implementation
plan submitted by a State must be adopted after reasonable notice and
public hearing. Section 110(l) of the Act similarly provides that each
revision to an implementation plan submitted by a State under the Act
must be adopted by such State after reasonable notice and public
hearing.
EPA also must determine whether a submittal is complete and
therefore warrants further EPA review and action [see section 110(k)(1)
and 57 FR 13565]. EPA's completeness criteria for SIP submittals are
set out at 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. EPA attempts to make
completeness determinations within 60 days of receiving a submission.
However, a submittal is deemed complete by operation of law if a
completeness determination is not made by EPA six months after receipt
of the submission.
To entertain public comment, the State of North Dakota, after
providing adequate notice, held public hearings on May 24, and May 25,
1994 to address the respective revisions to the SIP and Air Pollution
Control Rules. Following the public hearings, the North Dakota State
Health Council adopted the respective rule revisions.
The Governor of North Dakota submitted revisions to the SIP with a
letter dated December 21, 1994. The SIP revisions were reviewed by EPA
to determine completeness in accordance with the completeness criteria
set out at 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The submittal was found to be
complete and a letter dated February 13, 1995 was forwarded to the
Governor indicating the completeness of the submittal and the next
steps to be taken in the review process.
B. December 21, 1994 Revisions
The December 21, 1994 submittal addressed revisions to Chapter 2 of
the SIP, regarding delegatable authorities and asbestos law revisions,
and the following chapters of the North Dakota Air Pollution Control
Rules: 33-15-01 General Provisions; 33-15-02 Ambient Air Quality
Standards; 33-15-12 Standards of Performance for New Stationary
Sources; and 33-15-13 Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.
The December 21, 1994 submittal also addressed North Dakota Air
Pollution Control Rules involving the Title V permit to operate
program, the Acid Rain program, and emission standards for hazardous
air pollutants for source categories (MACT standards). However, in a
February 2, 1995 letter from Dana Mount, North Dakota Division of
Environmental Engineering, to Douglas Skie, EPA, the State indicated
that these programs were not intended to be reviewed through the SIP
process. Accordingly, EPA reviewed these revisions separately from the
rule revisions being considered in this document.
1. Asbestos Law Revisions
The 1993 North Dakota State Legislature made several revisions to
the North Dakota Century Code provisions pertaining to asbestos
regulation. These revisions were made to update the law to be
consistent with the Federal Clean Air Act. Clarifications were made to
the definition of ``asbestos worker'' and to the asbestos worker
licensing and certification requirements. In addition, a new subsection
was added to address requirements that the Department provide any
procedural rules necessary to develop, implement, and enforce air
pollution control programs, the authority and responsibility for which
have been delegated to the State by EPA. These revisions are consistent
with Federal requirements and, therefore, are approvable.
2. North Dakota Air Pollution Control Rules, Chapter 33-15-01 General
Provisions
Revisions were made to section 33-15-01-17, Enforcement, and a new
section 33-15-01-18, Compliance Certifications, was added. The change
to section 33-15-01-17 allows the North Dakota State Department of
Health and Consolidated Laboratories (``the Department'') to use
monitoring data as credible evidence that noncompliance of a source
exits. Section 33-15-01-18 allows the source to use monitoring data to
certify that the source is in compliance with the applicable emission
limits. These revisions are consistent with Federal requirements and,
therefore, are approvable.
[[Page 52866]]
These revisions also address EPA's nationwide SIP call regarding
the new enhanced monitoring and compliance certification requirements
of the amended Act. On October 22, 1993, EPA announced in the Federal
Register that SIP calls pursuant to section 110(k)(5) of the Act would
be issued in order to implement the enhanced monitoring requirements of
section 114(a)(3) of the Act and the periodic monitoring requirements
for operating permits under sections 502(b)(2) and 504 of the Act (see
58 FR 54677). This SIP call was required because existing SIPs could
have been interpreted to limit the types of testing or monitoring data
to be used for determining compliance and establishing violations.
EPA believes that the State has adequately satisfied the
requirements of the SIP call. The revision to section 33-15-01-17
provides that information from monitoring methods approved in a
federally enforceable operating permit or in the SIP, as well as from
any other federally enforceable monitoring and testing methods
(including those in 40 CFR Parts 50, 51, 60, 61, and 75), may be used
by the State as credible evidence to determine compliance. By allowing
compliance certifications to be made with approved enhanced monitoring
protocols or other approved monitoring methods, the new section 33-15-
01-18 has the practical effect of making the SIP more flexible and
inclusive since it does not preclude the use of enhanced monitoring.
Therefore, EPA is approving these revisions to Chapter 33-15-01
regarding enhanced monitoring and compliance certifications.
3. Chapter 33-15-02 Ambient Air Quality Standards
Revisions to this chapter consist of deleting the one-hour ambient
air quality standard for nitrogen dioxide. The State received a request
for this revision from the North Dakota Lignite Council. The State
indicated that the standard was originally written in terms that
allowed exceedances one percent of the time in any three-month period,
which proved to be a very cumbersome standard to track and required
extensive time by staff to perform dispersion modelling to ensure
compliance. The State opted to delete the one-hour standard and retain
the Federal annual standard of 100 g/m3, in response to
the need to develop a more manageable standard, the request by industry
that the one-hour standard be deleted, and EPA's 1993 findings that no
changes in the Federal standard were contemplated. This revision is
consistent with Federal requirements and, therefore, is approvable.
4. Chapter 33-15-12, Standards of Performance for New Stationary
Sources; Chapter 33-15-13, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants
The revisions to Chapters 33-15-12 and 33-15-13 incorporate by
reference the Federal NSPS in 40 CFR part 60 and the Federal NESHAPs in
40 CFR part 61, as in effect on May 1, 1994, with the exception of 40
CFR part 61, subparts B, H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W (i.e., radionuclides).
The revisions to Chapter 33-15-12 include the addition, by reference,
of Subpart RRR--Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions by Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI)
Reactor Processes. EPA reviewed the State's revised NSPS and NESHAPs
regulations and determined that they are consistent with the Federal
regulations and, therefore, are approvable.
II. Notice of Delegation of Authority to Colorado
On November 17, 1995, the State of Colorado submitted revisions to
its NSPS regulations in Part A of Colorado Regulation No. 6. The
submittal included the addition of the Federal NSPS in 40 CFR part 60,
subparts Dc, Ea, Kb, AAa, BBB, DDD, NNN, QQQ, RRR, SSS, TTT, UUU, and
VVV. Pursuant to such submittal, on February 15, 1996, delegation was
given with the following letter:
Honorable Roy Romer, Governor of Colorado, 136 State Capitol,
Denver, Colorado 80203-1792.
Dear Governor Romer: On November 17, 1995, you requested delegation
of authority for revisions to the New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) in Part A of Colorado's Regulation No. 6. These revisions
brought the State's NSPS up to date with the Federal NSPS in effect
as of October 11, 1994, with the exception of Subparts AAA (new
residential wood heaters) and III (volatile organic compound
emissions from the synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry
air oxidation unit processes) which the State has not adopted.
Subsequent to states adopting NSPS regulations, the EPA
delegates the authority for the implementation and enforcement of
those NSPS, so long as the State's regulations are equivalent to the
Federal regulations. EPA, therefore, is acting on the delegation of
authority to Colorado for implementation and enforcement of thirteen
NSPS.
EPA has reviewed the pertinent statutes and regulations of the
State of Colorado and has determined that they provide an adequate
and effective procedure for the implementation and enforcement of
the NSPS, including the source applicability dates, by the State of
Colorado. Therefore, pursuant to Section 111(c) of the Clean Air Act
(Act), as amended, and 40 CFR Part 60, EPA hereby delegates its
authority for the implementation and enforcement of the NSPS to the
State of Colorado as follows:
(A) Responsibility for all sources located, or to be located, in
the State of Colorado subject to the standards of performance for
new stationary sources promulgated in 40 CFR Part 60. The categories
of new stationary sources covered by this delegation are as follows:
small industrial-commercial-institutional steam generating units
(Subpart Dc), municipal waste combustors (Subpart Ea), volatile
organic liquid storage vessels (including petroleum liquid storage
vessels) for which construction, reconstruction, or modification
commenced after July 23, 1984 (Subpart Kb), steel plants: electric
arc furnaces and argon-oxygen decarburization vessels constructed
after August 7, 1983 (Subpart AAa), rubber tire manufacturing
industry (Subpart BBB), volatile organic compound emissions from the
polymer manufacturing industry (Subpart DDD), volatile organic
compound emissions from synthetic organic chemical manufacturing
industry distillation operations (Subpart NNN), volatile organic
compound emissions from petroleum refinery wastewater systems
(Subpart QQQ), volatile organic compound emissions from synthetic
organic chemical manufacturing industry reactor processes (Subpart
RRR), magnetic tape coating facilities (Subpart SSS), industrial
surface coating: surface coating of plastic parts for business
machines (Subpart TTT), calciners and dryers in mineral industries
(Subpart UUU), and polymeric coating of supporting substrates
facilities (Subpart VVV).
(B) Not all authorities of NSPS can be delegated to states under
Section 111(c) of the Act, as amended. The EPA Administrator retains
authority to implement those sections of the NSPS that require: (1)
approving equivalency determinations and alternative test methods,
(2) decision making to ensure national consistency, and (3) EPA
rulemaking to implement. Therefore, of the NSPS of 40 CFR Part 60
being delegated in this letter, the following sections are not
delegated to the State of Colorado:
(i) 40 CFR 60.48c(a)(4), pertaining to small industrial-
commercial-institutional steam generating units (Subpart Dc);
(ii) 40 CFR 60.111b(f)(4), 60.114b, 60.116b(e)(3)(iii),
60.116b(e)(3)(iv), and 60.116b(f)(2)(iii), pertaining to volatile
organic liquid storage vessels (including petroleum liquid storage
vessels) for which construction, reconstruction, or modification
commenced after July 23, 1984, (Subpart Kb);
(iii) 40 CFR 60.543(c)(2)(ii)(B), pertaining to the rubber tire
manufacturing industry (Subpart BBB);
(iv) 40 CFR 60.562-2(c), pertaining to volatile organic compound
emissions from the polymer manufacturing industry (Subpart DDD);
(v) 40 CFR 60.663(e), pertaining to volatile organic compound
emissions from synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry
distillation operations (Subpart NNN);
(vi) 40 CFR 60.694, pertaining to volatile organic compound
emissions from petroleum refinery wastewater systems (Subpart QQQ);
(vii) 40 CFR 60.703(e), pertaining to volatile organic compound
emissions from
[[Page 52867]]
synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry reactor processes
(Subpart RRR);
(viii) 40 CFR 60.711(a)(16), 60.713(b)(1)(i), 60.713(b)(1)(ii),
60.713(b)(5)(i), 60.713(d), 60.715(a), and 60.716, pertaining to
magnetic tape coating facilities (Subpart SSS);
(ix) 40 CFR 60.723(b)(1), 60.723(b)(2)(i)(C), 60.723(b)(2)(iv),
60.724(e), and 60.725(b), pertaining to industrial surface coating
of plastic parts for business machines (Subpart TTT); and
(x) 40 CFR 60.743(a)(3)(v) (A) and (B), 60.743(e), 60.745(a),
and 60.746, pertaining to polymeric coating of supporting substrates
facilities (Subpart VVV).
(C) As 40 CFR Part 60 is updated, Colorado should revise its
regulations accordingly and in a timely manner.
This delegation is based upon and is a continuation of the same
conditions as those stated in EPA's original delegation letter of
August 27, 1975, except that condition 3, relating to Federal
facilities, has been voided by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977.
It is also important to note that EPA retains concurrent enforcement
authority as stated in condition 2. In addition, if at any time
there is a conflict between a State and Federal NSPS regulation, the
Federal regulation must be applied if it is more stringent than that
of the State, as stated in condition 10. A copy of this letter was
published in the notices section of the Federal Register on October
31, 1975 (40 FR 50748), along with an associated rulemaking
notifying the public that certain reports and applications required
from operators of new or modified sources shall be submitted to the
State of Colorado (40 FR 50718). Copies of the Federal Register are
enclosed for your convenience.
Since this delegation is effective immediately, there is no need
for the State to notify the EPA of its acceptance. Unless we receive
written notice of objections from you within ten days of the date on
which you receive this letter, the State of Colorado will be deemed
to have accepted all the terms of this delegation. An information
notice will be published in the Federal Register in the near future
informing the public of this delegation, in which this letter will
appear in its entirety.
If you have any questions on this matter, please call me, or
have your staff contact Richard Long, Director of our Air Program,
at 312-6005.
Sincerely,
Patricia Hull,
Acting Regional Administrator.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving North Dakota's SIP revision, as submitted by the
Governor with a letter December 21, 1994. This submittal addressed
revisions to SIP Chapter 2, regarding Delegatable Authorities and
Asbestos Law Revisions, and revisions to the following North Dakota Air
Pollution Control Rules: 33-15-01 General Provisions; 33-15-02 Ambient
Air Quality Standards; 33-15-12 Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources; and 33-15-13 Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants. This approval provides the State with the authority for
implementation and enforcement of all Federal NSPS and NESHAPs (except
40 CFR part 61, subparts B, H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W, pertaining to
radionuclides) promulgated as of May 1, 1994. However, the State's NSPS
and NESHAP authorities do not include those authorities which cannot be
delegated to the states, as defined in 40 CFR parts 60 and 61. The
update of the 40 CFR part 60 table of NSPS delegations reflects these
December 1994 North Dakota revisions as well as North Dakota revisions
to the NSPS delegations that were approved in the Federal Register on
August 21, 1995 (60 FR 43396) and South Dakota revisions to the NSPS
delegations that were approved in the Federal Register on September 6,
1995 (60 FR 46225).
The December 21, 1994 submittal also included revisions to chapters
33-15-14, 33-15-21, 33-15-22, regarding the Title V permit to operate
program, Acid Rain program, and MACT standards. These issues were
reviewed separately from this document.
EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal
Register publication, EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision
should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be
effective December 9, 1996 unless, by November 7, 1996, adverse or
critical comments are received.
If EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn before
the effective date by publishing a subsequent notice that will withdraw
the final action. All public comments received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule.
EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this
time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this
action will be effective on December 9, 1996.
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for
revision to any SIP. Each request for revision to a SIP shall be
considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and
environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and
regulatory requirements.
IV. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature
by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the
Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a
July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted this regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600, et seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit
enterprises, and government entities with jurisdiction over populations
of less than 50,000.
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the
Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements, but simply approve
requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the
Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify
that it does not have a significant impact on any small entities
affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship
under the Act, preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would
constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state
action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning
SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246,
256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
C. Unfunded Mandates
Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to
the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for
[[Page 52868]]
informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly
or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100
million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action proposes to
approve pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes
not new Federal requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to
State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result
from this action.
D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
Under 5 U.S.C. section 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the
General Accounting Office prior to publication of this rule in today's
Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. section 804(2).
E. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 9, 1996. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 60
Air pollution control, Aluminum, Ammonium sulfate plants,
Beverages, Carbon monoxide, Cement industry, Coal, Copper, Dry
cleaners, Electric power plants, Fertilizers, Fluoride, Gasoline, Glass
and glass products, Grains, Graphic arts industry, Household
appliances, Insulation, Intergovernmental relations, Iron, Lead, Lime,
Metallic and nonmetallic mineral processing plants, Metals, Motor
vehicles, Natural gas, Nitric acid plants, Nitrogen dioxide, Paper and
paper products industry, Particulate matter, Paving and roofing
materials, Petroleum, Phosphate, Plastics materials and synthetics,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sewage disposal, Steel,
Sulfur oxides, Tires, Urethane, Vinyl, Waste treatment and disposal,
Wool, and Zinc.
Dated: September 13, 1996.
Patricia D. Hull,
Acting Regional Administrator.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart JJ--North Dakota
2. Section 52.1820 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(28) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1820 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(28) The Governor of North Dakota submitted revisions to the North
Dakota State Implementation Plan and Air Pollution Control Rules with a
letter dated December 21, 1994. The submittal addressed revisions to
SIP Chapter 2, regarding delegatable authorities and asbestos law
revisions, and to air pollution control rules regarding general
provisions; ambient air quality standards; new source performance
standards (NSPS); and national emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants (NESHAPs).
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Revisions to the following sections of the North Dakota Century
Code: 23-25-01; 23-25-03; and 23-25-03.1, effective August 1, 1993.
(B) Revisions to the Air Pollution Control Rules as follows:
General Provisions 33-15-01-17 and 33-15-01-18; Ambient Air Quality
Standards 33-15-02-05 and 33-15-02 Table 1; Standards of Performance
for New Stationary Sources 33-15-12; and Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants 33-15-13, effective December 1, 1994.
PART 60--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, 7411, 7414, 7416, and 7601 as amended
by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. 101-549, 104 Stat.
2399 (November 15, 1990; 402, 409, 415 of the Clean Air Act as
amended, 104 Stat. 2399, unless otherwise noted).
Subpart A--General Provisions
2. Section 60.4(c) is amended by revising the table to read as
follows:
Sec. 60.4 Address.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Delegation Status of New Source Performance Standards
[(NSPS) for Region VIII]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart CO MT\1\ ND\1\ SD\1\ UT\1\ WY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A--General Provisions......................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
D--Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generators......... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
Da--Electric Utility Steam Generators......... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
Db--Industrial-Commercial--Institutional Steam
Generators................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
Dc--Industrial-Commercial--Institutional Steam
Generators................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
E--Incinerators............................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
Ea--Municipal Waste Combustors................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
F--Portland Cement Plants..................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
G--Nitric Acid Plants......................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
H--Sulfuric Acid Plants....................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
I--Asphalt Concrete Plants.................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
J--Petroleum Refineries....................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
[[Page 52869]]
K--Petroleum Storage Vessels (after 6/11/73 &
prior to 5/19/78)........................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
Ka--Petroleum Storage Vessels (after 5/18/78 &
prior to 7/23/84)........................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
Kb--Petroleum Storage Vessels (after 7/23/84). (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
L--Secondary Lead Smelters.................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
M--Secondary Brass & Bronze Production Plants. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
N--Primary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process
Furnaces (after 6/11/73)..................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
Na--Secondary Emissions from Basic Oxygen
Process Furnaces (after 1/20/83)............. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
O--Sewage Treatment Plants.................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
P--Primary Copper Smelters.................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
Q--Primary Zinc Smelters...................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
R--Primary Lead Smelters...................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
S--Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants.......... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
T--Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Wet Process
Phosphoric Plants............................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
U--Phosphate Fertilizer Industry:
Superphosphoric Acid Plants.................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
V--Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Diammonium
Phosphate Plants............................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
W--Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Triple
Superphosphate Plants........................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
X--Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Granular
Triple Superphosphate Storage Facilities..... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
Y--Coal Preparation Plants.................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
Z--Ferroalloy Production Facilities........... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
AA--Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces (10/21/
74-8/17/83).................................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
AAa--Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces and
Argon-Oxygen Decarburization Vessels (after 8/
7/83)........................................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
BB--Kraft Pulp Mills.......................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
CC--Glass Manufacturing Plants................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
DD--Grain Elevator............................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
EE--Surface Coating of Metal Furniture........ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
GG--Stationary Gas Turbines................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
HH--Lime Manufacturing Plants................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
KK--Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants.... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
LL--Metallic Mineral Processing Plants........ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
MM--Automobile & Light Duty Truck Surface
Coating Operations........................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
NN--Phosphate Rock Plants..................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
PP--Ammonium Sulfate Manufacturing............ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
QQ--Graphic Arts Industry: Publication
Rotogravure Printing......................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
RR--Pressure Sensitive Tape & Label Surface
Coating...................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
SS--Industrial Surface Coating: Large
Applications................................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
TT--Metal Coil Surface Coating................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
UU--Asphalt Processing & Asphalt Roofing
Manufacture.................................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
VV--Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing:
Equipment Leaks of VOC....................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
WW--Beverage Can Surface Coating Industry..... (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)
XX--Bulk Gasoline Terminals................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
AAA--Residential Wood Heaters (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
BBB--Rubber Tires............................. (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)
DDD--VOC Emissions from Polymer Manufacturing
Industry..................................... (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)
FFF--Flexible Vinyl & Urethane Coating &
Printing..................................... (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)
GGG--Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum
Refineries................................... (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)
HHH--Synthetic Fiber Production............... (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)
III--VOC Emissions from the Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry Air Oxidation
Unit Processes............................... (*) (*) (*) (*)
JJJ--Petroleum Dry Cleaners................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
KKK--Equipment Leaks of VOC from Onshore
Natural Gas Processing Plants................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
LLL--Onshore Natural Gas Processing: SO2
Emissions.................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
NNN--VOC Emissions from the Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry Distillation
Operations................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
OOO--Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants.... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
PPP--Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing
Plants....................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
QQQ--VOC Emissions from Petroleum Refinery
Wastewater Systems........................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
RRR--VOC Emissions from Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI)
Reactor Processes............................ (*) (*) (*)
SSS--Magnetic Tape Industry................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
TTT--Plastic Parts for Business Machine
Coatings..................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
UUU--Calciners and Dryers in Mineral
Industries................................... (*) (*) (*)
[[Page 52870]]
VVV--Polymeric Coating of Supporting
Substrates................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(*) Indicates approval of state regulation.
\1\ Indicates approval of New Source Performance Standards as part of the State Implementation Plan (SIP).
[FR Doc. 96-25469 Filed 10-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P