[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 180 (Monday, September 16, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48609-48612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-23671]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 29
[Docket No. 96-ASW-5; Special Condition 29-ASW-19]
Special Condition: Aerospatiale Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, and AS-
365N2 ``Dauphlin'' Helicopters, Electronic Flight Instrument System and
Digital Standby Instrument System
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final special condition; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This special condition is issued for these Aerospatiale Model
SA-365N, SA-365N1, and AS-365N2 ``Dauphin'' helicopters. These
helicopters will have a novel or unusual design feature associated with
the Electronic Flight Instrument System and with the digital standby
system. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for the protection of these
critical function systems from the effects of external high intensity
radiated fields (HIRF). This special condition contains additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to that provided by the
applicable airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective September 16, 1996. Comments must be received on or
before October 16, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Attn:
Rules Docket No. 96-ASW-5, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0007, or delivered
in duplicate to the Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. Comments must be marked
Docket No. 96-ASW-5. Comments may be inspected in the Rules Docket
weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Robert McCallister, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft
Standards Staff, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0110; telephone (817) 222-
5121.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because
these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the approval
design and thus delay delivery of the affected helicopter. These notice
and comment procedures are also considered unnecessary since the public
has been previously provided with a substantial number of opportunities
to comment on substantially identical special conditions, and their
comments have been fully considered. Therefore, good cause exists for
making this special condition effective upon issuance.
Comments Invited
Although this final special condition was not subject to notice and
opportunity for prior public comment, comments are invited on this
final special condition Interested persons are invited to comment on
this final special condition by submitting such written data, views, or
arguments as they may desire. Communications should identify the
regulatory docket number and be submitted in duplicate to the address
specified under the caption ``addresses.'' All communications received
on or before the closing date for comments will be considered. This
special condition may be changed in light of comments received. All
comments received will be available in the Rules Docket for examination
by interested persons, both before and after the closing date for
comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this rulemaking will be filed in the docket.
Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this special condition must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following
statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. 96-ASW-5.'' The postcard
[[Page 48610]]
will be a date and time stamped and returned to the commenter.
Background
On March 5, 1996, American Eurocopter Corporation, Grand Prairie,
Texas, applied for a Supplemental Type Certificate for installation of
an Electronic Flight Instrument System and a digital stand-by
instrument in Aerospatiale Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, and AS-365N2
``Dauphin'' helicopters. Each of these models is a 13 passenger, two
engine, 9,370 pound transport category helicopter.
Type Certification Basis
The certification basis established for the Aerospatiale Model SA-
365N, SA-365N1, and AS-365N2 ``Dauphin'' helicopters includes: 14 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) 21.29 and part 29 effective February 1,
1965, Amendments 29-1 through 29-11; Airworthiness Criteria for
Helicopter Instrument Flight dated December 15, 1978, for Instrument
Flight Rule (IFR) certification. Aerospatiale has elected to comply
with part 29 Amendments 29-12 through 29-16 except for Sec. 29.397
relating to rotor brakes and except for Sec. 29.173 for longitudinal
static stability for SA-365N1 and AS-365N2. In addition to the
applicable airworthiness regulations and special conditions, the Model
AS-365N2 must comply with the noise certification requirements of part
36, Amendments 36-1 through 36-16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type
certificate to modify any other model included on the same type
certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature,
the special conditions would also apply to the other model under the
provisions of Sec. 21.101(a)(1). If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for these helicopters because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of Sec. 21.16 to establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established in the regulations.
Special conditions, as appropriate, are issued in accordance with
Sec. 11.49 after public notice, as required by Secs. 11.28 and
11.29(b), and become part of the type certification basis in accordance
with Sec. 21.101(b)(2) for changes to the type certificates.
Discussion
The Aerospatiale Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, and AS-365N2 ``Dauphin''
helicopters, at the time of application, were identified as having
modifications that incorporate one and possibly more electrical,
electronic, or combination of electrical and electronic (electrical/
electronic) systems that will perform functions critical to the
continued safe flight and landing of the helicopters. The electronic
flight instrument system and the standby instrument system performs the
attitude display function. The display of attitude, altitude, and
airspeed is critical to the continued safe flight and landing of the
helicopters for IFR operations in instrument meteorological conditions.
American Eurcopter will provide the FAA with a hazard analysis that
will identify any other critical functions performed by the electrical/
electronic systems that are critical to the continued safe flight and
landing of the helicopters.
Recent advances in technology have prompted the design of aircraft
that include advanced electrical and electronic systems that perform
functions required for continued safe flight and landing. However,
these advanced systems respond to the transient effects of induced
electrical current and voltage caused by the high intensity radiated
fields (HIRF) incident on the external surface of the helicopters.
These induced transient currents and voltages can degrade the
performance of the electrical/electronic systems by damaging the
components or by upsetting the systems' functions.
Furthermore, the electromagnetic environment has undergone a
transformation not envisioned by the current application of
Sec. 29.1309(a). Higher energy levels radiate from operational
transmitters currently used for radar, radio, and television; and the
number of transmitters has increased significantly.
Existing aircraft certification requirements are inappropriate in
view of these technological advances. In addition, the FAA has received
reports of some significant safety incidents and accidents involving
military aircraft equipped with advanced electrical/electronic systems
when they were exposed to electromagnetic radiation.
The combined effects of technological advances in helicopter design
and the changing environment have resulted in an increased level of
vulnerability of the electrical and electronic systems required for the
continued safe flight and landing of the helicopters. Effective
measures to protect these helicopters against the adverse effects of
exposure to HIRF will be provided by the design and installation of
these systems. The following primary factors contributed to the current
conditions: (1) Increased use of sensitive electronics that perform
critical functions, (2) reduced electromagnetic shielding afforded
helicopter systems by advanced technology airframe materials, (3)
adverse service experience of military aircraft using these
technologies, and (4) an increase in the number and power of radio
frequency emitters and the expected increase in the future.
The FAA recognizes the need for aircraft certification standards to
keep pace with technological developments and a changing environment
and in 1986 initiated a high priority program to (1) Determine and
define electromagnetic energy levels; (2) develop guidance material for
design, test, and analysis; and (3) prescribe and promulgate regulatory
standards.
The FAA participated with industry and airworthiness authorities of
other countries to develop internationally recognized standards for
certification.
The FAA and airworthiness authorities of other countries have
identified a level of HIRF environment that a helicopter could be
exposed to during IFR operations. While the HIRF requirements are being
finalized, the FAA is adopting a special condition for the
certification of aircraft that employ electrical/electronic systems
that perform critical functions. The accepted maximum energy levels
that civilian helicopter system installations must withstand for safe
operation are based on surveys and analysis of existing radio frequency
emitters. This special condition will require the helicopters'
electrical/electronic systems and associated wiring to be protected
from these energy levels. These external threat levels are believed to
represent the worst-case exposure for a helicopter operating under IFR.
The HIRF environment specified in this special condition is based
on many critical assumptions. With the exception of takeoff and landing
at an airport, one of these assumptions is that the aircraft would be
not less than 500 feet above ground level (AGL). Helicopters operating
under visual flight rules (VFR) routinely operate at less than 500 feet
AGL and perform takeoffs and landings at locations other than
controlled airports. Therefore, it would be expected that the HIRF
environment experienced by a helicopter operating VFR may exceed the
defined environment by 100 percent or more.
This special condition will require the systems that perform
critical functions, as installed in the aircraft, to meet certain
standards based on either a defined HIRF environment or a fixed value
using laboratory tests.
The applicant may demonstrate that the operation and operational
[[Page 48611]]
capabilities of the installed electrical/electronic systems that
perform critical functions are not adversely affected when the aircraft
is exposed to the defined HIRF environment. The FAA has determined that
the environment defined in Table 1 is acceptable for critical functions
in helicopters operating at or above 500 feet AGL. For critical
functions of helicopters operating at less than 500 feet AGL,
additional factors must be considered.
The applicant may also demonstrate by a laboratory test that the
electrical/electronic systems that perform critical functions can
withstand a peak electromagnetic field strength in a frequency range of
10 KHz to 18 GHz. If a laboratory test is used to show
compliance with the defined HIRF environment, no credit will be given
for signal attenuation due to installation. A level of 100 volts per
meter (v/m) and other considerations, such as an alternate technology
backup that is immune to HIRF, are appropriate for critical functions
during IFR operations. A level of 200 v/m and further considerations,
such as an alternate technology backup that is immune to HIRF, are more
appropriate for critical functions during VFR operations. Applicants
must perform a hazard analysis to identify electrical/electronic
systems that perform critical functions. The term ``critical'' means
those functions whose failure would contribute to or cause a failure
condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of
the helicopters. The systems identified by the hazard analysis as
performing critical functions are required to have HIRF protection.
A system may perform both critical and noncritical functions.
Primary electronic flight display systems and their associated
components perform critical functions such as attitude, altitude, and
airspeed indications. HIRF requirements would apply only to the systems
that perform critical functions.
Compliance with HIRF requirements will be demonstrated by tests,
analysis, models, similarity with existing systems, or a combination of
these methods. The two basic options of either testing the rotorcraft
to the defined environment or laboratory testing may not be combined.
The laboratory test allows some frequency areas to be under tested and
requires other areas to have some safety margin when compared to the
defined environment. The areas required to have some safety margin are
those shown, by past testing, to exhibit greater susceptibility to
adverse effects from HIRF; and laboratory tests, in general, do not
accurately represent the aircraft installation. Service experience
alone will not be acceptable since such experience in normal flight
operations may not include an exposure to HIRF. Reliance on a system
with similar design features for redundancy, as a means of protection
against the effects of external HIRF, is generally insufficient because
all elements of a redundant system are likely to be concurrently
exposed to the radiated fields.
The modulation that represents the signal most likely to disrupt
the operation of the system under test, based on its design
characteristics, should be selected. For example, flight control
systems may be susceptible to 3 Hz square wave modulation while
the video signals for electronic display systems may be susceptible to
400 Hz sinusoidal modulation. If the worst-case modulation is
unknown or cannot be determined, default modulations may be used.
Suggested default values are a 1 KHz sine wave with 80 percent
depth of modulation in the frequency range from 10 KHz to 400
MHz and 1 KHz square wave with greater than 90 percent depth
of modulation from 400 MHz to 18 GHz. For frequencies where
the unmodulated signal would cause deviations from normal operation,
several different modulating signals with various waveforms and
frequencies should be applied.
Acceptable system performance would be attained by demonstrating
that the critical function components of the system under consideration
continue to perform their intended function during and after exposure
to required electromagnetic fields. Deviations from system
specifications may be acceptable but must be independently assessed by
the FAA on a case-by-case basis.
Table 1.--Field Strength Volts/Meter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frequency Peak Average
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-100 KHz............................................. 50 50
100-500................................................ 60 60
500-2000............................................... 70 70
2-30 MHz............................................... 200 200
30-100................................................. 30 30
100-200................................................ 150 33
200-400................................................ 70 70
400-700................................................ 4020 935
700-1000............................................... 1700 170
1-2 GHz................................................ 5000 990
2-4.................................................... 6680 840
4-6.................................................... 6850 310
6-8.................................................... 3600 670
8-12................................................... 3500 1270
12-18.................................................. 3500 360
18-40.................................................. 2100 750
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Aerospatiale Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, AS-365N2 ``Dauphin'' helicopters
modified by American Eurocopter Corporation. Should American Eurocopter
Corporation apply at a later date for a supplemental type certificate
to modify any other model included on Type Certificate No. H10EU to
incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as well, under provisions of
Sec. 21.101(a)(1).
Conclusion
This action affects only certain unusual or novel design features
on three models of helicopters. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the affected helicopters.
The substance of this special condition for similar installations
in a variety of helicopters has been subjected to the notice and
comment procedure and has been finalized without substantive change. It
is unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant
change from the substance contained herein. For this reason, and
because a delay would significantly affect the certification of the
helicopter, which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public
notice and comment are unnecessary and impractical, and good cause
exists for adopting this special condition immediately. Therefore, this
special condition is being made effective upon issuance. The FAA is
requesting comments to allow interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in response to prior opportunities for
comment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 29
Aircraft, Air transportation, Aviation safety, Rotorcraft, Safety.
The authority citations for this special condition are as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 1344, 1348(c), 1352, 1354(a), 1355, 1421
through 1431, 1502, 1651(b)(2); 42 U.S.C. 1857f-10, 4321 et seq.;
E.O. 11514; 49 U.S.C. 106(g).
The Special Condition
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special condition is issued as part of the
type certification basis for the Aerospatiale Model SA-365N, SA-365N1,
and AS-365N2 ``Dauphin'' helicopters Protection for Electrical and
Electronic Systems From High Intensity Radiated Fields.
[[Page 48612]]
Each system that performs critical functions must be designed and
installed to ensure that the operation and operational capabilities of
these critical functions are not adversely affected when the helicopter
is exposed to high intensity radiated fields external to the
helicopter.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 28, 1996.
Eric Bries,
Aircraft Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 96-23671 Filed 9-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M