[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 11, 1996)] [Notices] [Pages 47866-47867] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 96-23207] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rocky Mountain Region; Environmental Impact Statement for Sheep Flats Diversity Unit Timber Sales, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests, Mesa County, Colorado AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Revison of a Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: The responsible official for this environmental impact statement is Mr. Robert Storch, Forest Supervisor of the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests, 2250 Highway 50, Delta, Colorado 81416. SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact statement about four (4) proposed timber sales: Valley View, Sheep Flats, Grove Creek, and Leon. These sales are located in the Sheep Flats Diversity Unit on the Grand Mesa National Forest, Collbran Ranger District. DATES: Publication of Draft EIS: November 1996; Final EIS: August 1997. ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Pam Bode, Team Leader, USDA Forest Service, 216 North Colorado Street, Gunnison, CO, 81230. Contact Pam Bode also for further information. Phone: 970-641-0471. FAX: 970-641- 1928. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest Supervisor will use this Environmental Impact Statement to decide how to manage the timber resource within the Sheep Flats Diversity Unit. The Forest Service is proposing to harvest four timber sales on this National Forest system land. Even-aged and uneven-aged silvicultural systems are being planned in Engelmann spruce, sub-alpine fir, and aspen stands. These sales are scheduled to be offered within a five to ten year period after this analysis. Initial scoping of interested parties identified three preliminary issues. These are: (1) Constructing roads and harvesting timber within an area that was identified as the Salt Creek Roadless Area during the 1979 RARE II process, (2) harvesting old growth timber, and (3) cumulative impacts on ecosystems from logging operations in and around the sale areas. Five alternatives will be studied in this analysis. Alternative 1 is no action. Alternatives 2 and 4 harvest suitable timber but do not enter the Salt Creek Roadless Area. Alternative 2 creates a balance of structural stages and accommodates wildlife travel corridors. Alternative 4 maximizes the amount of wood fiber removed. Alternatives 3 and 5 harvest suitable timber throughout the Diversity Unit, including within the Salt Creek Roadless Area. Alternative 3 creates a balance of structural stages and accommodates wildlife travel corridors. Alternative 5 maximizes the amount of wood fiber removed. The proposed action is Alternative 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acres planned for harvest Alternative -------------------------------- Volume in Number of Total acres RARE II acres board feet sales ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.................................................... 0 0 0 0 2.................................................... 707 0 2,456,000 1 3.................................................... 2,666 1959 11,505,000 4 4.................................................... 914 0 3,387,000 1 5.................................................... 3,647 2733 15,630,000 4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This notice is a renotification of the Forest Service's intent to study these timber sales within the Sheep Flats Diversity Unit. A previous notice of intent was published in the Federal Register Volume 57, #31, on 2/14/92. A previous notice of availability of the draft EIS was published in Volume 59, #5, on 1/7/94. This notice provides new dates for completions of the revised draft and the final Environmental Impact Statements. The alternatives that are being studied have changed substantially from the previous document. Since this is a renotification, news releases have already been issued and a public meeting has already taken place in March, 1992. Field tours to the proposed area have already been conducted with concerned parties. Additional news releases have been issued explaining the new timeline for this analysis. Parties that expressed interest previously have been informed individually by mail that this analysis is continuing. No additional public meetings are planned, however, the Forest Service is willing to consider any party's request for additional field tours or public meetings. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the [[Page 47867]] environmental review process. First, reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the draft environmental impact stage but that are not raised until after completion of the final environmental statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1980) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final environmental impact statement. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statements. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. Dated: August 8, 1996. Robert L. Storch, Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 96-23207 Filed 9-10-96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-11-M