[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 148 (Wednesday, July 31, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39862-39867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-19412]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

15 CFR Part 946

[Docket No. 960418114-6201-03]
RIN: 0648-AF72


Weather Service Modernization Criteria

AGENCY: National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Weather Service Modernization Act, 15 
U.S.C. 313n. (the Act), the National Weather Service (NWS) is 
publishing an amendment to its criteria for modernization actions 
requiring certification. This amendment adds criteria unique to 
automating a field office to ensure that automation actions will not 
result in any degradation of service. Automating a field office occurs 
after automated surface observing system (ASOS) equipment is installed 
and commissioned at a field office and the News employees that were 
performing surface observations at that office are removed or 
reassigned.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 31, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of documents stated in the preamble as 
being available upon request should be sent to Julie Scanlon, NOAA/NWS, 
SSMC2, Room 9332, 1325 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland 
20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Scheller, 301-713-0454.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 2, 1996, the NWS published, for 
comment, proposed modernization criteria unique to automating a field 
office (see 61 FR 19594). In significant part, the proposed criteria 
embodied the four levels of service contained in the Federal Aviation 
Administration's (FAA) Weather Observation Service Standards for level 
A, B, C and D airports (see 61 FR 32887). After consideration of the 
public comments that were received and, after consultation with the 
National Research Council's (NRC) NWS Modernization Committee and the 
Modernization Transition Committee (MTC), the NWS is now establishing 
the final modernization criteria for automating a field office only at 
service level A, B and C airports. Establishment of final modernization 
criteria for automating a field office at service level D airports is 
being deferred pending further consultation with the MTC.
    Consultation with the NRC's NWS Modernization Committee was 
completed on June 10, 1996. During consultation with the MTC on June 
27, 1996, the MTC offered the following:

    The Modernization Transition Committee (MTC) has reviewed the 
comments received in response to the notice in the Federal Register, 
considered information provided through presentations and reports, 
and thoroughly discussed the issue of level of service provided by 
the modernized weather service as compared to on-site observers, 
with the following conclusion:
    The MTC approves the proposed automation criteria for airport 
service level A, B and C airports believing that there will be no 
degradation of service associated with these certifications. 
However, the Committee has drawn no conclusion about degradation of 
service at D service level airports that previously had an NWS 
observer. The Committee will address the remaining portion of D 
service level airports at their next scheduled meeting.
Peter R. Leavitt
Chair, Modernization Transition Committee.

    A total of 44 public comments were received with postmarks by the 
closing date for comments. Six additional comments were received with 
postmarks after the closing date. The issues raised in these late 
comments however, were similar to others raised in the timely comments. 
All comments received were considered and are included in the numerical 
totals below. The issues and concerns raised in the comments and the 
Government's response follows. Most comments have to do with leaving 
ASOS unattended, either generally or at specific airports. The number 
of issues/concerns exceeds the total number of comments, since multiple 
issues/concerns were raised in some comments. A list of persons 
submitting comments is also included.
    A. Comments related to leaving ASOS unattended:
    1. Comment: 33 comments stated that service level D was inadequate 
for their particular airport.
    Response: Establishment of final criteria for service level D 
airports has been deferred. The NWS will not take any action to 
automate field offices at service level D airports, pending further 
consultation with the MTC. Accordingly, the 27 airports proposed for 
service level D have been deleted from Appendix B.
    2. Comment: 10 comments expressed the following concerns about 
ASOS: (a) ASOS can not be left in the unattended mode; (b) a human 
presence is required at all ASOS sites; and (c) ASOS observation is 
sometimes unrepresentative of actual conditions.
    Response: Development and testing of automated weather observing

[[Page 39863]]

equipment has been in progress for nearly 20 years. Numerous studies 
and evaluations were conducted on automated observation systems 
beginning in the 1970s which included systems and technology similar to 
that of ASOS. Assessments of representativeness were made by comparing 
automated reports, specifically, ceiling and visibility to the human 
observer. As a result of the more than two decades of development and 
testing, ASOS has evolved into a highly accurate, consistent, and 
reliable complement to meteorological observations.
    The most recent testing effort was the ASOS Aviation Demonstration 
that was carried out jointly by the NWS, the FAA, and the aviation 
industry, from February 15, 1995 through August 15, 1995. During this 
Demonstration, NWS observers were asked to record those cases when ASOS 
observations did not represent the true meteorological situation. Based 
on reports supplied by NWS observers, ASOS was found to report the 
correct individual weather parameters at least 98% of the time under 
all conditions combined.
    From the beginning, ASOS was never intended to be the sole source 
of surface weather data. ASOS data will be supplemented by products 
derived from other remote automated systems including satellite, radar, 
and lightning networks. Efforts to develop and refine these new sensors 
and additional data products are underway. However, ASOS observations 
will continue to be ``augmented'' by human observers, at those sites 
required by the aviation community, until these additional sensors and 
data products are available, and their use is fully understood.
    The strength of ASOS is not that it is ``better'' than the 
observer, but that the sensor suite can be put in the area most 
sensitive to the weather that the pilot needs, that multiple sensors 
can be used at those sites where required, and that ASOS observations 
are consistent from station to station, day to night, and continuous 24 
hours a day.
    3. Comment: One comment stated that the FAA, NWS, aviation 
community agreement on service level D included a requirement for both 
freezing rain and lightning detection sensors.
    Response: The deployment of freezing rain sensors as part of the 
ASOS is underway. Funding has been allocated for acquisition of over 
400 sensors. The freezing rain software and hardware upgrade deployment 
will be deployed at NWS sites by winter 1996/1997.
    Automated thunderstorm detection capability is presently being 
acquired as part of the Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) Data 
Acquisition System and will provide an automated thunderstorm report in 
the METAR format from the ASOS at all level A, B, C and D sites. 
Deployment of this automated thunderstorm reporting capability will 
begin in June 1997. Until that time, thunderstorms will be detected and 
reported manually at all sites with implemented level A, B and C 
Weather Observation Service Standards.
    Pending automation of freezing rain and thunderstorm detection and 
reporting, neither of these parameters will be manually augmented at 
level D sites. This policy was clearly established during the extensive 
discussions on Weather Observation Service Standards with the aviation 
industry during the last 18 months.
    4. Comment: Three comments regarding Astoria, Oregon, proposed as a 
D level airport, requested that local public hearings be held before 
ASOS implementation.
    Response: The ASOS has already been ``implemented'' at Astoria, 
Oregon to the extent that it was commissioned on March 1, 1993. The 
second stage of implementation will be to ``automate'' this office and 
the Weather Service Modernization Act already provides for extensive 
public input at this stage in several ways. Criteria by which these 
actions will be certified are made available for public comment through 
publication in the Federal Register. Two independent committees are 
consulted during the establishment of final criteria: The National 
Research Council's NWS Modernization Committee which is composed of 
scientific and technical experts, and the Modernization Transition 
Committee (MTC) which represents users of weather services. During 
these consultations, both Committees are apprised of all public 
comments received. There are two other opportunities for public input 
during the certification process. Each proposed certification is 
published in the Federal Register for a 60-day public comment period. 
The MTC is apprised of all public comments received and has the 
opportunity to recommend a course of action to the Secretary of 
Commerce with regard to the final certification of ``no degradation of 
service''. Finally, the MTC is a Federal advisory committee and as 
such, all MTC meetings are open to the public. As part of the 
consultation with the MTC on certifications and preceding deliberations 
by the MTC, there is a public comment period during which the public 
may address the MTC.
    B. Other comments:
    1. Comment: Six comments were concerned that there might be a delay 
in implementing service levels A and B due to lack of funds and that 
the delay would result in a degradation of service. One comment 
requested that a ban on further ASOS commissionings be instituted until 
funds are available to implement service levels A and B.
    Response: The FAA will fund full implementation of the Weather 
Observation Service Standards, including all level A and B airports. 
Accordingly, NWS has eliminated any funding contingency from criterion 
4a.
    2. Comment: Two comments indicated that the list of airports 
published in the May 2 Federal Register notice was incomplete and/or 
confusing.
    Response: The airports in the May 2, 1996 Federal Register notice 
list were the 143 ``field offices'' which require a certification prior 
to automation under the Weather Service Modernization Act. The Act 
defines a field office as a Weather Service Office (WSO) or a Weather 
Service Forecast Office (WSFO). Beyond these 143 locations, there are 
additional airports where NWS has surface observing responsibility that 
either: (1) Are not field offices--Weather Service Meteorological 
Observatories (WSMOs) and Weather Service Contract Meteorological 
Observatories (WSCMOs); or (2) are field offices, but NWS will continue 
to perform surface observing functions. There are also a number of 
airports where the FAA has surface observing responsibility. On June 
25, 1996, the FAA published in the Federal Register its Weather 
Observation Service Standards and a more comprehensive list of all 
airports where either NWS or FAA has had surface observing 
responsibility (see 61 FR 32887). Not included in this June 25 notice 
are the so called ``expansion sites'', which are sites that have not 
had a Federally sponsored surface observation.
    3. Comment: One comment stated that automation, as proposed, will 
have an adverse impact on snowfall records.
    Response: Snowfall data will continue to be recorded at 46 Weather 
Forecast Offices (WFO) co-located with ASOS as well as new snowfall 
climatologies will commence at 73 WFOs during the 1996-1997 winter 
season. In addition, snow-depth observations will continue at 22 Tower 
Level 5 airports next winter season. In addition, along the Washington 
and Oregon coastline, there are over 30 NWS cooperative observer (COOP) 
climate stations that will continue to report daily snowfall, snow 
depth, and accurate precipitation amounts for climatologists. The 
primary

[[Page 39864]]

purpose of this volunteer network is the taking of long-term climate 
records. The NWS is now in the process of implementing a system that 
will allow these observations to be disseminated to external users 
once-a-day in near real-time.
    Washington and Oregon contain about one dozen first-order airport 
stations that historically reported snowfall information that will no 
longer be available. However, data from COOP climate stations in both 
states are actually considered to be the data of choice by most 
climate-change researchers. The COOPs are located off airports at 
locations where people live. COOPs with decades of records are found in 
the temperate rain forests, Olympic mountains, and other ecologically 
sensitive areas.
    The volunteer COOP network will continue to provide high-quality 
climate data for NWS and external users. The NWS is even considering 
opening new COOP stations in areas where observations are scarce with 
snowfall information unavailable and whereby no current COOP is located 
in the surrounding vicinity.
    In addition, the Supplementary Data Program (see 60 FR 64020), 
became operational on October 1, 1995 at 119 WFOs, where staffing and 
equipment permits. This includes the providing of event driven 
supplementary data observations (i.e., ice pellets, snow increase 
rapidly, size of hailstones) and routinely scheduled supplementary 
climatological data (i.e., depth of new snow, duration of sunshine, 
water equivalent of snow on ground).
    4. Comment: One comment expressed concerns with ASOS's inability to 
detect clouds above 12,000 feet, use of ``fair'' for sky conditions 
when ASOS reports ``CLR below 12,000 ft.'', and ASOS not reporting 
freezing rain.
    Response: A few years ago, NOAA started generating a Satellite 
Cloud Product (SCP) to complement ASOS above 12,000 ft. SCPs, generated 
for a 50x50-km grid centered around ASOS sites, are available in 
regional collectives through the Family of Services with the following 
bulletin headings:

GOES-8

TCUS40 KWBC--Eastern US
TCUS41 KWBC--Central US
TCUS42 KWBC--Southern US

GOES-9

TCUS51 KWBC--Central US
TCUS52 KWBC--Southern US
TCUS53 KWBC--Western US

    Among other things, the SCPs indicate the cloud category (CLR, SCT, 
BKN, OVC) and the height of the cloud in 100's of feet.
    NWS is sensitized to the ``FAIR'' issue and is working toward a 
more representative depiction of sky conditions on the Hourly (State) 
Weather Roundup (SWR). NWS sites which ``run'' the SWR can merge the 
SCP data with the ASOS data, thereby producing a better combined sky 
condition. Many NWS sites are already doing this and more will be doing 
so in the future once SCPs are generated for all ASOS sites.
    The issue of the ``FAIR'' on The Weather Channel (TWC) is a little 
different. TWC gets its observational data from Weather Services 
International (WSI) Corporation. WSI does not presently process NWS 
SWRs. ``FAIR'' is a WSI term.
    NWS has had discussions with both TWC and WSI about this issue. 
Both are working on schemes to assimilate the SCP data, thereby making 
a more representative sky condition. In lieu of utilizing the WSI 
observational data stream, TWC is independently investigating the 
feasibility of ``ingesting'' and displaying the NWS SWRs on their 
``Weather on the 8's'' segment.
    The concern about reporting of freezing rain is addressed in the 
response to comment A3.
    5. Comment: One comment stated that ASOS should be replaced by 
METAR.
    Response: The writer of this comment has misunderstood the 
difference between METAR and ASOS.
    The Aviation Routine Weather Report (METAR) does not replace ASOS. 
ASOS is an automated and integrated group of sensors to collect surface 
weather parameters.
    METAR on the other hand is the reporting format in which the 
weather elements are provided from the ASOS. Historically, there have 
been two weather reporting formats. North American countries (United 
States, Canada and Mexico) used a format referred to as a Surface 
Aviation Observation (SAOP, and the rest of the world, with minor 
differences, used a format called Aviation Routine Weather Report 
(METAR) to report weather. For years discussions took place on 
standardizing the reporting format. Agreement was reached in 1989 and 
the resultant code, still referred to as METAR, represents a blend of 
the existing SAO and METAR reports. Because countries were permitted to 
file exceptions to the code format, not all METAR reports are 
identical, and thus there will be slight differences among the codes. 
Canada and Mexico have already implemented the METAR code format, and 
the United States, in accordance with international agreements, 
implemented the METAR code format on July 1, 1996.
    6. Comment: One comment stated that the ASOS at Wheeling-Ohio 
County Airport remains uncommissioned.
    Response: The ASOS at Wheeling--Ohio County airport is an FAA-
sponsored ASOS and requires FAA long-line communications for 
commissioning. Currently, plans are to install the communications lines 
in the fall 1996 followed by commissioning in January/February 1997.
    7. Comment: One comment stated that there is no radio transmission 
from the ASOS at Marathon Airport (MTH), Florida.
    Reponse: A ground-to-air radio was installed at Marathon in March 
1994. Shortly after installation, radio frequency interference was 
reported. That interference problem was corrected on May 14, 1996 and 
the radio is now broadcasting.
    8. Comment: Three comments raised concerns about specific public 
forecast product, the quality of the forecasts, timeliness of NOAA 
Weather Radio updates, elimination of the agricultural forecast program 
and closure of the Astoria, Oregon Weather Service Office (WSO).
    Response: These issues are not related to ASOS and/or automation 
and are more appropriately addressed during the certification process 
for actions involving the particular WSOs.

List of Persons Submitting Comments

Dean Jacobs, Executive Director, Valentine Chamber of Commerce, 
Valentine, Nebraska
Dean Jacobs, Executive Director, Visitor Promotion Committee, Cherry 
County, Valentine, Nebraska
concerned citizen, Freeland, Michigan
Jay Trobec, KELO-TV, Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Mike Boggs, Airport Manager, Eugene Airport, Eugene, Oregon
Kelly Kilmer, Quality Control Focal Point, Valentine ASOS Station, 
Valentine, Nebraska
Troy Kimmel, Chief Meteorologist, KTBC-TV, Austin, Texas
Robert Kilmer, Airport Manager, Valentine, Nebraska (2 comments)
Evelyn Kilmer, Valentine, Nebraska (2 comments)
Gerald Ellison, Valentine Nebraska
Allan L. Jameson, Commercial Pilot, Valentine, Nebraska
Robert A. Peterson, Administrator, Valentine, Nebraska
Tim Bader, Valentine, Nebraska
Paul Joseph, Chief Meteorologist, WTMJ-TV, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Thomas S. Tominack, Airport Manager, Wheeling-Ohio County Airport, 
Wheeling West Virginia

[[Page 39865]]

A. Earl Cheal, Vice President and General Manager, The Flight 
Department, Marathon Airport, Marathon, Florida
Timothy M. Kellett, Paso Robles, California (2 comments)
Leo D. Hollis, Director--Flight Control, America West Airlines, 
Phoenix, Arizona
Joe Bakkensen, Chair, Board of Commissioners, Clatsop County, 
Astoria, Oregon
Thomas G. Macklin, Paso Robles, California
Sean Boyd, KSEE-TV, Fresno, California
Ron Larsen, Director of Operations, Port of Astoria, Astoria, Oregon 
(2 comments)
Melvin Christenson, Cherry County Sheriff, Valentine, Nebraska
John P. Raichl, Sheriff and Director of Emergency Services, Clatsop 
County, Astoria, Oregon
Richard Carlson, Sequim, Washington
Steve Fick, President, Salmon for All, Astoria, Oregon
William N. Sears, Director, Air Traffic Capacity & Meteorology, Air 
Transport Association, Washington, DC
Robert J. Massey, Chairman, Aviation Weather Committee, Air Line 
Pilots Association, Herndon, Virginia
Warren L. Qualley, Manager--Weather Services, American Airlines, DFW 
Airport, Texas
Tom Fahey, Manager, Northwest Airlines Meteorology, St. Paul, 
Minnesota
Paul Gross, WDIV-TV, Detroit, Michigan
Barbara Balensifier, Mayor of Warrenton, Warrenton, Oregon
Brad Barclay, Contract Weather Observer, Paso Robles Airport, 
Atascadero, California
Drs. Richard & Janet Laughlin, Astoria, Oregon
Robert D. DeLong, City Manager, Astoria, Oregon
Paul O'Connell, RN, Flight Supervisor, Good Samaritan Hospital, 
Kearney, Nebraska
Robert Stratton, Templeton, California
Paul Levesque, Executive Assistant, Tillamook County Commissioners, 
Tillamook, Oregon
Monte M. Eliason, Airport Manager, Glacier Park International 
Airport, Kalispell, Montana
Pam Birmingham, Pete Anderson Realty, Inc., Seaside, Oregon
Tim Josi, State Representative, District 2, Salem, Oregon
Dennis Ernest, Program Director, KNEB AM/FM, Scottsbluff, Nebraska
William R. McDonald, Chairman, Columbia County Board of 
Commissioners, St. Helens, Oregon
Oliver Vernor, Mayor, City of Seaside, Seaside, Oregon
Pat Hamilton, Chairperson, Pacific County Commissioners, South Bend, 
Washington
William F. Shea, Commissioner, Port of Astoria, Astoria, Oregon

A. Classification Under Executive Order 12866

    These regulations establish procedures and criteria for certifying 
that certain actions to modernize NWS will not result in any 
degradation of weather services to the affected service area. They will 
not result in any direct or indirect economic impacts, and have been 
determined not to be significant for purposes of E.O. 12866.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

    These regulations set forth the criteria for certifying that 
certain modernization actions will not result in a degradation of 
service to the affected area. These criteria will be appended to the 
Weather Service Modernization regulations. The Assistant General 
Counsel for Legislation and Regulation of the Department of Commerce 
has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
Administration when these criteria were proposed, that if adopted as 
proposed, they will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. These criteria are intended for 
internal agency use, and the impact on small business entities will be 
negligible. The proposed criteria do not directly affect ``small 
government jurisdictions'' as defined by Pub. L. 96-354, the Regulatory 
flexibility Act. Accordingly, no initial regulatory flexibility 
analysis was prepared.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980

    These regulations will impose no information collection 
requirements of the type covered by Pub. L. 96-511, the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1980.

D. Executive Order 12612

    This rule does not contain policies with sufficient Federalism 
implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism assessment under 
Executive Order 12612.

E. National Environmental Policy Act

    NOAA has concluded that issuance of this rule does not constitute a 
major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not 
required. A programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) regarding 
NEXRAD was prepared in November 1984, and an Environmental Assessment 
to update the portion of the EIS dealing with the bioeffects of NEXRAD 
non-ionizing radiation was issued in 1993.

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 946

    Administrative practice and procedure, Certification, 
Commissioning. Decommissioning, national Weather Service, Weather 
service modernization.

    Dated: July 26, 1996.
Elbert W. Friday, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 15 CFR part 946 is amended 
as follows:

    1. The authority citation for part 946 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: Title VII of Pub. L. 102-567, 106 Stat 4303 (15 
U.S.C. 313n.)

    2. Appendix A to part 946 is amended by adding a new Subsection (D) 
under Section II. CRITERIA FOR MODERNIZATION ACTIONS REQUIRING 
CERTIFICATION, to read as follows:

(D) Modernization Criteria Unique to Automation Certifications

    1. Compliance with flight aviation rules (applies on airports 
only): Consultation with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 
has verified that the weather services provided after the 
commissioning of the relevant ASOS unit(s) will be in full 
compliance with applicable Federal Aviation Regulations promulgated 
by the FAA.
    2. ASOS Commissioning: The relevant ASOS unit(s) have been 
successfully commissioned in accordance with the criteria set forth 
in section I.A.1 of Appendix A to the Weather Service Modernization 
Regulations, 15 CFR part 946.
    3. User Confirmation of Services: Any valid user complaints 
related to actual system performance received since commissioning of 
the ASOS have been satisfactorily resolved and the issues addressed 
in the MIC's recommendation for certification.
    4. Aviation Observation Requirement: At sites subject to 
automation certification, all surface observations and reports 
required for aviation services can be generated by an ASOS augmented 
as necessary by non-NWS personnel.
    a. The ASOS observation will be augmented/backed-up to the level 
specified in Appendix B as described in the Summary Chart of the 
FAA's Weather Observation Service Standards.
    b. The transition checklist has been signed by the appropriate 
Region Systems Operations Division Chief.
    5. General Surface Observation Requirement: The total 
observations available are adequate to support the required 
inventory of services to users in the affected area. All necessary 
hydrometeorological data and information are available through ASOS 
as augmented in accordance with this section, through those elements 
reported as supplementary data by the relevant Weather Forecast 
Office(s), or through other complementary sources. The adequacy of 
the total surface observation is addressed in the MIC's 
recommendation for certification.
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M

[[Page 39866]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR31JY96.000



BILLING CODE 3510-12-C

[[Page 39867]]

    Appendix B is added to Part 946 to read as follows:

Appendix B to Part 946--Airport Tables

``A'' Level Service Airports

*Akron, OH..........................................................CAK
*Albany, NY.........................................................ALB
*Atlanta, GA........................................................ATL
*Baltimore, MD......................................................BWI
*Boston, MA.........................................................BOS
Charlotte, NC.......................................................CLT
*Chicago-O'Hare (AV), IL............................................ORD
Cincinnati, OH......................................................CVG
Columbus, OH........................................................CMH
*Dayton, OH.........................................................DAY
*Des Moines, IA.....................................................DSM
*Detroit, MI........................................................DTW
*Fairbanks, AK......................................................FAI
*Fresno, CA.........................................................FAT
*Greensboro, NC.....................................................GSO
*Hartford, CT.......................................................BDL
*Indianapolis, IN...................................................IND
*Kansas City, MO....................................................MCI
*Lansing, MI........................................................LAN
Las Vegas, NV.......................................................LAS
Los Angeles (AV), CA................................................LAX
*Louisville, KY.....................................................SDF
*Milwaukee, WI......................................................MKE
*Minneapolis, MN....................................................MSP
*Newark, NJ.........................................................EWR
*Oklahoma City, OK..................................................OKC
Phoenix, AZ.........................................................PHX
*Portland, OR.......................................................PDX
*Providence, RI.....................................................PVD
*Raleigh, NC........................................................RDU
*Richmond, NC.......................................................RIC
*Rochester, NY......................................................ROC
*Rockford, IL.......................................................RFD
*San Antonio, TX....................................................SAT
San Diego, CA.......................................................SAN
*San Francisco, CA..................................................SFO
*Spokane, WA........................................................GEG
*Syracuse, NY.......................................................SYR
Tallahassee, FL.....................................................TLH
Tulsa, OK...........................................................TUL

``B'' Level Service Airports

*Baton Rouge, LA....................................................BTR
*Billings, MT.......................................................BIL
*Charleston, WV.....................................................CRW
*Chattanooga, TN....................................................CHA
Colorado Springs, CO................................................COS
Daytona Beach, FL...................................................DAB
El Paso, TX.........................................................ELP
Flint, MI...........................................................FNT
Fort Wayne, IN......................................................FWA
Honolulu, HI........................................................HNL
*Huntsville, AL.....................................................HSV
*Knoxville, TN......................................................TYS
*Lincoln, NE........................................................LNK
Lubbock, TX.........................................................LBB
*Madison, WI........................................................MSN
*Moline, IL.........................................................MLI
*Montgomery, AL.....................................................MGM
*Muskegon, MI.......................................................MKG
*Norfolk, VA........................................................ORF
Peoria, IL..........................................................PIA
*Savannah, GA.......................................................SAV
*South Bend, IN.....................................................SBN
Tucson, AZ..........................................................TUS
*West Palm Beach, FL................................................PBI
*Youngstown, OH.....................................................YNG

``C'' Level Service Airports

Abilene, TX.........................................................ABI
Allentown, PA.......................................................ABE
Asheville, NC.......................................................AVL
Athens, GA..........................................................AHN
Atlantic City, NJ...................................................ACY
Augusta, GA.........................................................AGS
Austin, TX..........................................................AUS
Bakersfield, CA.....................................................BFL
Bridgeport, CT......................................................BDR
Bristol, TN.........................................................TRI
Casper, WY..........................................................CPR
Columbia, MO........................................................COU
Columbus, GA........................................................CSG
Dubuque, IA.........................................................DBQ
Erie, PA............................................................ERI
Eugene, OR..........................................................EUG
Evansville, IN......................................................EVV
Fargo, ND...........................................................FAR
Fort Smith, AR......................................................FSM
Grand Island, NE....................................................GRI
Helena, MT..........................................................HLN
Huntington, WV......................................................HTS
Kahului, HI.........................................................OGG
Key West, FL........................................................EYW
Lewiston, ID........................................................LWS
Lexington, KY.......................................................LEX
Lynchburg, VA.......................................................LYH
Macon, GA...........................................................MCN
Mansfield, OH.......................................................MFD
Meridian, MS........................................................MEI
Olympia, WA.........................................................OLM
Port Arthur, TX.....................................................BPT
Portland, ME........................................................PWM
Rapid City, SD......................................................RAP
Redding, CA.........................................................RDD
Reno, NV............................................................RNO
Roanoke, VA.........................................................ROA
Rochester, MN.......................................................RST
Salem, OR...........................................................SLE
Santa Maria, CA.....................................................SMX
Sioux City, IA......................................................SUX
Springfield, IL.....................................................SPI
Stockton, CA........................................................SCK
Toledo, OH..........................................................TOL
Waco, TX............................................................ACT
Waterloo, IA........................................................ALO
Wilkes-Barre, PA....................................................AVP
Williamsport, PA....................................................IPT
Wilmington, DE......................................................ILG
Worcester, MA.......................................................ORH
Yakima, WA..........................................................YKM

    *Long-line RVR designated site.

[FR Doc. 96-19412 Filed 7-30-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M