[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25858-25859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-12922]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. EL96-52-000, et al.]


Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia v. Georgia Power Company, 
et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

May 15, 1996.
    Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
Commission:

1. Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia v. Georgia Power Company

[Docket No. EL96-52-000]

    Take notice that on May 10, 1996, the Municipal Electric Authority 
of Georgia (MEAG) filed a Complaint and Motion for Expedited Relief 
against Georgia Power Company (GPC) under Section 205 and 206 of the 
Federal Power Act. MEAG is seeking early termination of the obligations 
between MEAG and GPC arising from GPC's partial requirements tariff and 
related agreements on the grounds that said agreements are unjust and 
unreasonable. MEAG is also seeking refunds from GPC for violations of 
the filed rate doctrine and for the improper accounting practices 
utilized by GPC in applying the formulary rate set forth in the tariff.
    Comment date: June 14, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

2. Union Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95-487-000]

    Take notice that on May 6, 1996, Union Electric Company tendered 
for filing an Interchange Agreement dated June 10, 1994, between the 
United States of America, as represented by the Administrator, 
Southwestern Power Administration (SPA) and Union Electric Company 
(UE). UE asserts that the agreement provides for the exchange of power 
and energy between the parties.
    Comment date: May 29, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

3. NORSTAR Energy Limited Partnership

[Docket No. ER96-10-001]

    Take notice that on May 9, 1996, NORSTAR Energy Limited Partnership 
tendered for filing its compliance filing in the above-referenced 
docket.
    Comment date: May 29, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

4. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., Rockland Electric Company and 
Pike County Light & Power Company

[Docket No. ER96-1059-000]

    Take notice that on May 9, 1996, Orange and Rockland Utilities, 
Inc., on

[[Page 25859]]

behalf of itself and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Rockland Electric 
Company and Pike County Light & Power Company (collectively ``Orange 
and Rockland'') tendered for filing a compliance filing in the above 
referenced docket.
    Comment date: May 29, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

5. Montana Power Company

[Docket No. ER96-1437-000]

    Take notice that on May 7, 1996, the Montana Power Company 
(Montana) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission an amendment to its original filing in the above referenced 
docket.
    Comment date: May 29, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

6. Boroughs of Lansdale Blakely Catawissa, Duncannon, Ephrata, 
Hatfield, Kutztown, Lehighton, Mifflinburg, Olyphant, Perkasie, 
Quakertown, St. Clair, Schuylkill Haven, Watsontown and Weatherly, 
Pennsylvania

[Docket No. TX96-9-000]

    On May 9, 1996, the Boroughs of Lansdale, Blakely, Catawissa, 
Duncannon, Ephrata, Hatfield, Kutztown, Lehighton, Mifflinburg, 
(Olyphant, Perkasie, Quakertown, St. Clair, Schuylkill Haven, 
Watsontown and Weatherly, Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania Boroughs'' or 
``Boroughs'') filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an 
application requesting that the Commission order Pennsylvania Power & 
Light Company (PP&L) to provide transmission services to the Boroughs 
without seeking to assess any stranded investment costs, pursuant to 
Sections 211 and 212 of the Federal Power Act.
    In their application, the Boroughs seek to obtain a ruling as to 
whether PP&L can impose a future stranded investment charge on the 
Boroughs as a condition for using PP&L's transmission system to obtain 
alternate sources of power upon the termination of the existing supply 
contracts between PP&L and the Boroughs.
    Comment date: June 17, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph:

    E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-12922 Filed 5-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P