[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 24, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18070-18075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-9960]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Part 221
[Docket No. 50355; Notice No. 12]
RIN 2105-AC23
Electronic Filing of International Airline Passenger Rules
Tariffs
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule authorizes airlines to electronically file tariff
rules governing availability of passenger fares and their conditions of
service, subject to certain minimal format requirements. The
Department's regulations have permitted the electronic filing of
passenger fares since 1989. The Department is undertaking this action
in support of the administration's campaign to reinvent government and
at the request of tariff publishing agents in order to extend the
efficiencies of electronic data transmission and processing to the
filing of passenger rules tariffs.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation is effective on April 24, 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Keith A. Shangraw or Mr. John H.
Kiser, Office of the Secretary, Office of International Aviation,
Pricing and Multilateral Affairs Division, Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: (202) 366-2435.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 19, 1995, the Department published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) to authorize electronic filing of airline tariff
rules governing international passenger fares and the general
conditions of service associated with their use (60 FR 26848). The
proposed action would largely eliminate the filing of paper tariff
rules, an archaic system that no longer meets the data transmission and
processing requirements of the industry or the Department. In addition,
it will save the airline industry over a million dollars in tariff
submission, printing and distribution costs and will substantially
reduce the Department's review, filing and storage expenses.
The Department's regulations have permitted the electronic filing
of
[[Page 18071]]
international passenger fare levels and associated data in tariffs
since 1989, as an alternative to the filing of paper fares tariffs (54
FR 2087, January 19, 1989).1 The regulation, contained in Subpart
W of Part 221, established a number of criteria that must be met for
carriers or their agents to make such filings, including a signed
agreement or agreements providing for the maintenance and security of
the on-line tariff database. Approval by the Department of an
application containing various hardware and software service
commitments, as well as the filer's proposed format, is also required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Associated data include arbitraries, footnotes, routing
numbers and fare class explanations. See 14 CFR sections 221.4 and
221.283.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ATPCO, a publishing agent owned by and representing a number of
U.S. and foreign airlines, was initially the only entity that applied
for authority to make electronic fare filings under the rule. In
December 1989, it received final approval from the Department to
commence official electronic filings. On November 28, 1990, ATPCO filed
a petition for rulemaking in Docket 47288, requesting the amendment of
Part 221 to permit the alternative electronic filing of all
international tariffs. The petition included suggested regulatory
changes to accommodate the filing of passenger and cargo rules, and
cargo rates.
In February 1992, the Department permitted ATPCO to begin filing
electronic passenger rules that apply to specific fare types on an
unofficial test basis. The official fare rules, however, continue to be
filed on paper. In addition, ATPCO has not completed development of
electronic formats for general passenger rules relating to conditions
of carriage; these too, continue to be filed on paper.
By a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published October 15, 1992, in
Docket 48385, 57 FR 47303, the Department proposed extensive revisions
to Part 221 to permit the electronic filing of all international
tariffs. Following a comment period and a public meeting, the proposal
was withdrawn for further study of various technical issues, and the
proceeding was terminated. 58 FR 12350, March 4, 1993.
Requests for Further Action
Since the termination of the 1992 rulemaking, ATPCO has informally
urged the Department to take whatever actions may be necessary to
develop the capability for the acceptance and processing of all tariffs
electronically.
In addition, another entity demonstrated interest in filing
international tariffs electronically with the Department. The Societe
Internationale de Telecommunications Aeronautiques (SITA), a tariff
publishing service which developed an electronic tariff filing system
for use in Europe and elsewhere, demonstrated its ProFile system to the
Department's staff and made modifications to accommodate U.S.
requirements and procedures. On June 21, 1994, SITA submitted an
application under section 221.260 for the necessary Department
approvals to permit it to begin filing international passenger tariffs,
encompassing fares and rules to the extent authorized by the
Department, and SITA has filed passenger fares on an unofficial test
basis. However, on November 10, 1995, SITA withdrew its application,
stating that its proposed filing service has not encountered the
anticipated international endorsement by government authorities and
airlines.
The Proposal
In the May 1995 NPRM the Department proposed to amend section
221.251 of Subpart W of its tariff filing regulations, 14 CFR Part 221,
to authorize the electronic filing by all airlines and tariff
publishing agents of any or all rules relating to the provision of
passenger services.2 Like the filing of passenger fare levels
already authorized, this alternative to the traditional paper format
and procedures set forth in Part 221 would be permissive in nature, and
would be governed by the provisions of Subpart W. This Subpart would
authorize the electronic filing of all tariff material relating to
passenger services that airlines are required to file with the
Department, although the existing requirements for final approval of a
particular electronic tariff filing system and its associated formats,
set forth in Subpart W, must be complied with before the Department
will accept authorized electronic filings as official tariffs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The proposed amendment to section 221.251, as drafted, did
not encompass the filing of cargo rates and rules tariffs. By a
final rule issued November 30, 1995, the Department exempted all
carriers from the statutory and regulatory duty to file
international property (cargo) tariffs with the Department, and the
carriers ceased filing all cargo rates and rules tariffs on that
date (60 FR 61472).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department also proposed to amend section 221.283 of subpart W
to add certain minimum tariff format requirements to provide a basic
working framework for the processing of tariff rules, which differ from
fare filings in many technical respects. The existing format
requirements set forth in section 221.283(b)(8), developed largely for
the processing of fares and associated data, would not be changed but
would be described as specifically applicable to the filing of fares.
The new format requirements for the filing of rules would be set forth
in a new section 221.283(b)(9).3 The provisions would not
necessarily have to be presented in the same order as listed in
proposed section 221.283(b)(9), but each rule would have to include at
least all of the listed provisions.4 Consequential amendments
would be made to provisions regarding maintenance of historical data
(paragraph (c) of section 221.283, and section 221.260(b)(7)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The NPRM also noted that most individual format issues have
been and will continue to be resolved through consultations between
the Department and individual filing agents, as provided in section
221.260(b)(1) of the current regulations. However, the Department
recognizes that there may be a need to propose further amendments to
Part 221 to deal comprehensively with general format and procedural
issues, as well as with the question of the appropriate filing fees
to be charged in the future, as soon as more data and experience are
available.
\4\ We would consider each provision of an electronic tariff
rule to be a ``record'' for purposes of assessing filing fees under
14 CFR sections 389.20(b) and 389.25(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three format issues were raised for comment in the NPRM. First, our
proposed format criteria did not address the filing format of so-called
``general'' fare rules and ``unpublished fare'' rules. General fare
rules typically include provisions, applicable to all passengers,
relating to general conditions of carriage such as liability, baggage,
fare construction, and refunds. Unpublished fare rules typically
establish discounts for certain classes of traffic not limited to
specific markets, e.g., children and infants, agents, tour conductors,
emigrants and cargo attendants. Electronic formats for filing general
and unpublished fare rules are still under development by the industry.
Second, we proposed not to accept ``Intentionally Left Blank'' as a
category entry in an electronic fare rule, nor would we accept the
complete omission of a rule category to serve as a default to a general
rule.5 These practices, which have been a source of confusion in
the paper filing environment, would become increasingly confusing in an
environment where the fare rules are filed electronically but the
general rules are still filed on paper. Where carriers wish to default
to a general rule for a particular condition, we proposed to require
that electronic rules contain a specific entry for each category in the
rule. The entry could be either a specific reference to the relevant
general rule or
[[Page 18072]]
specific conditions extracted from the general rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Under the Department's interpretation, where a particular
provision is intentionally left blank in a rule, no such provision
applies to the fare covered by the rule. For example, where the
``group requirements'' section is left blank, it means there are no
group requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third, in the test electronic rules we have received thus far,
carriers have been including some extraneous material that is not
properly part of a tariff and of which we take no regulatory notice,
e.g., provisions concerning ticket and booking codes and annotations,
wait listing procedures, and reservation record requirements. We
recognize that carriers submit such material to their filing agents
along with associated fare and rule changes for non-regulatory
purposes, such as notifying computer reservations systems of the
carrier's technical procedures. However, this extraneous material is
not approved by the Department, and its inclusion in official
electronic rules would cause confusion. Therefore, our proposal
precluded inclusion of such material in official electronic tariff
filings.
Comments
We received comments on our proposal from Aer Lingus; Air France;
ATPCO; American Airlines, Inc.; British Airways, PLC; SITA; United Air
Lines, Inc.; and USAir, Inc.6 In general, all commenters support
the proposal in principle. Most, however, expressed reservations
concerning the formatting issues discussed in the NPRM. The formatting
drawing the most extensive comments from carriers and agents involves
the filing of ``extraneous material''. ATPCO also commented extensively
on issues relating to general rule defaults and formats.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The submissions of Aer Lingus and Air France were both
accompanied by motions to file comments out of time, which we will
grant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Decision
We have decided to adopt the rule substantially as proposed.
However, we will make certain changes regarding the formatting issues
in response to the comments.
Discussion of Comments and Issues
Scope of the Proposed Rule
ATPCO requests that the Department take a broader, more flexible
approach that authorizes electronic filing of all tariff material,
subject only to DOT's approval of the filer's format, rather than the
narrow approach, limited to passenger fare rules, it believes has been
taken here. ATPCO contends that Departmental references to future Part
221 amendments, relating to general format and procedural issues and to
filing fees, suggest that the Department is contemplating future
massive changes to Part 221 which would substantially change
requirements governing electronic filing. APTCO has no objection if
these are references to future rulemaking proceedings to ``tie up loose
ends''. However, it does object if the Department is contemplating
sweeping changes to electronic filing rules in place. At a minimum,
ATPCO believes that the Department should explain its future plans for
adopting a comprehensive electronic tariff-filing rule.
It appears that ATPCO has misunderstood the scope and intent of our
NPRM and believes that the proposed rule only authorizes the electronic
filing of passenger fare rules. In fact, proposed Part 221.251 (a)
states that ``[a]ny carrier * * * may file its international passenger
fare tariffs and international passenger rules tariffs electronically *
* *''. This includes passenger fare rules and general rules. While the
Department has indicated that additional changes in Part 221 may be
necessary to deal with general format and procedural issues, we have
resolved most individual format issues, in the past, through
consultations with individual filing agents, as provided in section
221.260(b)(1) of the current regulations, and fully expect to make use
of this process in the future. Thus ATPCO's general rule format, when
it is developed, could be reviewed and approved by the Department
independently of any future amendments to Part 221. The same process
could also apply to formats for the electronic filing of unpublished
fare rules and for routing tariffs.
Intentionally Left Blank
ATPCO also requested elimination of the proposed format criteria
under which the Department would not accept ``Intentionally Left
Blank'' as a category entry in an electronic fare rule, or the complete
omission of a rule category to serve as a default to a general rule.
While not objecting to the exclusion of ``Intentionally Left Blank'',
ATPCO is concerned about a required specific reference to the general
rule or conditions extracted from the general rule. It argues that this
would impose a greater regulatory burden than is now required for paper
filings where, in the absence of a provision in a fare rule, the
general rules tariff applies without the need to specify the general
rule. In addition, while ATPCO is presently developing a general rules
format which will provide a ``logical path'' from the fare rule to the
general rule, it maintains that this will not be operational until the
second half of 1996. This delay, it contends, should not prevent users
from reaping the benefits of the electronic filing of fare rules.
Otherwise, it would have to continue to file its rules on paper until
its general rules system is operational, or longer if the Department
requires another rulemaking proceeding.
As noted in the NPRM, the use of ``Intentionally Left Blank'' can
be quite misleading, especially in an electronic filing environment.
This language can be interpreted in two quite different ways: it can be
perceived to mean that there are no provisions applicable for that rule
category, or it can be viewed as a default to provisions set forth in
the general rule. This kind of ambiguity is not acceptable in an
electronic filing environment. Clarity of tariff material has always
been a prime objective of the Department's tariff regulations, and we
affirm our proposal not to accept ``Intentionally Left Blank'' in
electronic rules. We are, however, mindful of ATPCO's statement that it
is developing a logical path from the fare rule to the general rule,
and, therefore, we will not adopt our proposal in the NPRM to require
that the fare rule contain either a specific reference to the
applicable portion of the general rule or an actual extract taken from
the general rule. We believe that any remaining issues related to the
exclusion of ``Intentionally Left Blank'' can be resolved in the
context of an application by ATPCO for approval of its specific
electronic rule filing formats.
``Extraneous Material''
As noted, the formatting issue prompting the most extensive
comments from carriers and agents involves the filing of ``extraneous
material'', such as ticket and booking codes, wait list procedures and
reservations requirements. In general, ATPCO and the U.S. carriers
argue that this information is vital not only to carrier CRS's, but
also to travel agents and the public, since it is essential for the
proper handling of passenger reservations. ATPCO maintains that its
existing, unified filing system is designed to present this information
to all users in the most cost effective, efficient and flexible way.
However, were the requirement regarding non-filing of extraneous
material adopted, the respondents contend that ATPCO would have to
either undertake an expensive and time consuming creation of a separate
data base for the Department, or would have to continue to file carrier
fare rules on paper. ATPCO estimates that ``extraneous information''
constitutes no more than ten percent of the fare rule information, and
believes that filing it on a ``for information purposes only'' basis
would not unduly burden DOT.
[[Page 18073]]
In addition, SITA, supported by British Airways and Air France,
asserts that the Department should accept ticket codes and annotations,
wait listing procedures and reservations record requirements as proper
material for filing in official electronic tariffs. They contend that
this material is part of the conditions imposed by the carriers on a
passenger's use of a fare and, therefore, should be part of the
official filed tariff. This viewpoint, they argue, is supported by two
of the new format requirements proposed in the NPRM which would require
carriers to include specific material relating to reservations/
ticketing and capacity control in their official tariff filings.
Upon consideration of the comments, we have decided not to preclude
inclusion of such material in official electronic tariff filings at
this time, provided that it is sufficiently identified as unofficial
and non-binding. As a threshold matter, we are not persuaded by SITA
and the two foreign carriers that this material should be filed for
approval in official tariffs. While these codes, procedures and other
provisions may have certain informational value for agents and other
carriers, they are not needed by the Department to evaluate proper
tariff material or otherwise perform its regulatory duties, and they
are not, nor have they ever been, reviewed for legal sufficiency or
approved in amy manner under our statute. Moreover, we believe that the
presence of such unofficial material in official filings could
potentially mislead passengers, courts or other carriers into the
assumption that it has the binding legal effect normally accorded to
official tariff material. At the same time, however, we are persuaded
that requiring the immediate exclusion of such material would create an
implementation burden and impose additional programming costs on
carriers and filing agents. While, in the long run, we expect that all
filers will review their software formats and procedures to minimize
the amount of extraneous material appearing in official electronic
filings with the Department, material of the nature may accompany
tariffs provided that it is clearly identified as ``for information
only; not part of official tariff'' in a manner acceptable to the
Department.7 Should confusion persist that such material may be
binding on carriers and passengers as a matter of statute, we may have
to take further action to alleviate the problem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The determination of whether certain fare rule elements are
extraneous and not proper tariff material can be complex. Therefore,
we reserve the right to determine whether material filed ``for
information only; not part of official tariff'' is proper tariff
material or not, and to take appropriate regulatory action should we
decide that it is.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We wish to reiterate that the amendments proposed leave in place
the procedural and technical requirements of Subpart W, which each
electronic filer must satisfy before official electronic rule filings
can be accepted. In addition to those listed in section 221.260, for
example, are provisions such as those in section 221.500 regarding the
submission of machine-readable copies of records existing when
electronic filing is implemented, and the cancellation of records from
the paper tariff. As noted above, section 221.260 includes the
requirement that the Department approve the precise format used by each
electronic filer before official filings can be made. This is normally
done by letter once a period of successful test filings has been
accomplished and the Department is satisfied that the filing system
meets regulatory needs. However, Subpart W also imposes continuing
performance requirements, violations of which could lead to enforcement
action or even withdrawal of electronic filing privileges.
Finally, we would note that the success of electronic rules filing
will depend on scrupulous adherence to the Department's regulatory
requirements by both carriers and their filing agents. The Department's
staff will be closely monitoring performance in this regard, and will
work with parties to ensure the utility and integrity of the electronic
tariff system.
We find good cause to make this rule effective upon publication
because it allows an alternative means of compliance and relieves
current restrictions.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this rule
is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, not subject to OMB review. The Department has determined
that the rule is not significant under the Department's Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 CFR 11034; Feb. 26, 1979). The rule reduces
the paperwork burden for all U.S. and foreign air carriers now filing
their passenger rules tariffs on paper. The Department expects the
economic impact of the rule, however, to be modest. The rule will not
result in any required additional costs to the carriers or the public.
It will simply provide an alternative method of meeting the statutory
tariff-filing requirements. The estimated savings are discussed below.
Executive Order 12612
This rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 (``Federalism''), and the
Department has determined the rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The tariff filing
requirements apply to scheduled service air carriers. The vast majority
of the air carriers filing international (``foreign'') passenger rules
tariffs are large operators with revenues in excess of several million
dollars each year. Small air carriers operating aircraft with 60 seats
or less and 18,000 pounds payload or less that offer on-demand air-taxi
service are not required to file such tariffs.
Paperwork Reduction Act
With respect to the Paperwork Reduction Act, this rule would
replace two paper filings for most rules with a single electronic
filing. Thus, while this rule will significantly reduce the paperwork
burden on government and industry, it does not eliminate information
collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget pursuant to the Act.
The Department estimates that filing of passenger tariff rule pages
in paper format will be reduced by about ninety percent, with the
remaining ten percent continuing to be filed in paper form. A total of
about 42,000 passenger tariff rule pages and about 6,400 Passenger
Special Tariff Permission Applications (STPA's) were filed in 1994. At
a filing fee of $2 a rule page and $12 a passenger STPA, we estimate
the carriers could save as much as $145,000 annually in filing fees
paid to the Department. In addition, ATPCO charges the carriers $35.00
for each filed tariff page and up to $30.00 for each STPA. On this
basis, we estimate that the rule could save the carriers an additional
$1,500,000 in associated fees paid to ATPCO, producing potential total
savings to the carriers in excess of $1,600,000.
While not estimated, we expect that costs of governmental review,
filing and archiving of paper tariff rule filings will be similarly
reduced.
The reduction in reporting and recordkeeping requirements
associated with this rule are being submitted to
[[Page 18074]]
OMB for approval in accordance with 44 U.S.C. chapter 35 under OMB NO.
2137-AC23; Administration: Department of Transportation; TITLE:
Electronic Filing of Passenger Service Rules Tariffs; NEED FOR
INFORMATION: Authorizes the electronic filing of rules governing the
provision of passenger services; PROPOSED USE OF INFORMATION:
Authorization is based on the request of tariff publishing agents to
extend the efficiencies of electronic data transmission and processing
to the filing of rules tariffs; FREQUENCY: An initial passenger tariff
rule filing is required of each respondent; changes are voluntary,
whenever an air carrier elects; ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN UNDER NEW
RULE: 1,312,480 hours; RESPONDENTS: 230; FORM(S) 26,681 electronic
filings, pages or applications per annum; AVERAGE BURDEN HOURS PER
RESPONDENT: 5706 hours.
For further information on paperwork reduction contact: The
Information Requirements Division, M-34, Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590, (202)
366-4735 or DOT Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 3228, Washington, D.C. 20503.
Regulation Identifier Number
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the heading
of this document can be used to cross reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 221
Air rates and fares, Agents, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth herein, and under authority delegated in
49 CFR 1.56(j)(2)(ii), the Department of Transportation amends 14 CFR
Part 221 as follows:
PART 221--TARIFFS
Subpart W--Electronically Filed Tariffs
1. The authority citation for Part 221 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 USC 40101, 40109, 40113, 46101, 46102, Chapter
411, Chapter 413, Chapter 415, and Subchapter I of Chapter 417.
2. Section 221.251 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 221.251 Applicability of the subpart.
(a) Any carrier, consistent with the provisions of this subpart,
and part 221 generally, may file its international passenger fares
tariffs and international passenger rules tariffs electronically in
machine-readable form as an alternative to the filing of printed paper
tariffs as provided for elsewhere in Part 221. This subpart applies to
all carriers and tariff publishing agents and may be used by either if
the carrier or agent complies with the provisions of subpart W. Any
carrier or agent that files electronically under this subpart must
transmit to the Department the remainder of the tariff, as applicable,
in a form consistent with this Part 221, subparts A through V, on the
same day that the electronic tariff would be deemed received under
Sec. 221.270(b).
* * * * *
3. Paragraph (b)(7) of section 221.260, is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 221.260 Requirements for filing.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(7) The filer shall maintain all fares and rules with the
Department and all Departmental approvals, disapprovals and other
actions, as well as all Departmental notations concerning such
approvals, disapprovals or other actions, in the on-line tariff
database for a period of two (2) years after the fare or rule becomes
inactive. After this period of time, the carrier or agent shall provide
the Department, free of charge, with a copy of the inactive date on a
machine-readable tape or other mutually acceptable electronic medium.
* * * * *
4. Section 221.283 is amended by revising the introductory text of
paragraph (b)(8) and by adding new paragraphs (b)(9) and (b)(10) to
read as follows:
Sec. 221.283 The filing of tariffs and amendments to tariffs.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(8) Fares tariff, or proposed changes to the fares tariffs,
including: * * *
(9) Rules tariff, or proposed changes to the rules tariffs.
(i) Rules tariffs shall include:
(A) Title: General description of fare rule type and geographic
area under the rule;
(B) Application: Specific description of fare class, geographic
area, type of transportation (one way, round-trip, etc.);
(C) Period of Validity: Specific description of permissible travel
dates and any restrictions on when travel is not permitted;
(D) Reservations/ticketing: Specific description of reservation and
ticketing provisions, including any advance reservation/ticketing
requirements, provisions for payment (including prepaid tickets), and
charges for any changes;
(E) Capacity Control: Specific description of any limitation on the
number of passengers, available seats, or tickets;
(F) Combinations: Specific description of permitted/restricted fare
combinations;
(G) Length of Stay: Specific description of minimum/maximum number
of days before the passenger may/must begin return travel;
(H) Stopovers: Specific description of permissible conditions,
restrictions, or charges on stopovers;
(I) Routing: specific description of routing provisions, including
transfer provisions, whether on-line or inter-line;
(J) Discounts: Specific description of any limitations, special
conditions, and discounts on status fares, e.g. children or infants,
senior citizens, tour conductors, or travel agents, and any other
discounts;
(K) Cancellation and Refunds: Specific description of any special
conditions, charges, or credits due for cancellation or changes to
reservations, or for request for refund of purchased tickets;
(L) Group Requirements: Specific description of group size, travel
conditions, group eligibility, and documentation;
(M) Tour Requirements: Specific description of tour requirements,
including minimum price, and any stay or accommodation provisions;
(N) Sales Restrictions: Specific description of any restrictions on
the sale of tickets;
(O) Rerouting: Specific description of rerouting provisions,
whether on-line or inter-line, including any applicable charges; and
(P) Miscellaneous provisions: Any other applicable conditions.
(ii) Rules tariffs shall not contain the phrase ``intentionally
left blank''.
(10) Any material accepted by the Department for informational
purposes only shall be clearly identified as ``for information only,
not part of official tariff'', in a manner acceptable to the
Department.
5. Paragraph (c) of Sec. 221.283 is amended by redesignating
existing paragraphs (c) (8) through (15) as paragraphs (c) (9) through
(16), respectively, and by adding a new paragraph (c)(8) to read as
follows:
[[Page 18075]]
Sec. 221.283 The filing of tariffs and amendments to tariffs.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(8) Rule text.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington DC, on this 15th day of April, 1996.
Charles A. Hunnicutt,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-9960 Filed 4-23-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P