[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 62 (Friday, March 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14079-14087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-7657]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Weather Service Modernization and Associated
Restructuring
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
[[Page 14080]]
ACTION: Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Weather Service (NWS) is publishing proposed
certifications for the proposed consolidations of:
(1) Residual Indianapolis Weather Service Office (RWSO) into the
future Indianapolis WFO;
(2) Dubuque Weather Service Office (WSO) into the future Quad
Cities and Milwaukee Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
(3) Allentown WSO into the future Philadelphia, Central
Pennsylvania and Binghamton WFOs;
(4) Beckley WSO into the future Charleston and Roanoke WFOs;
(5) Bridgeport WSO into the future New York City WFO;
(6) Residual Charleston, WV WSO into the future Charleston, WV WFO;
(7) Elkins WSO into the future Charleston, WV, Pittsburgh and
Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC WFOs;
(8) Huntington WSO into the future Charleston, WV and Cincinnati
WFOs;
(9) Wilkes-Barre WSO into the future Binghamton and Central
Pennsylvania WFOs;
(10) Residual Atlanta WSO into the future Atlanta WFO;
(11) Bakersfield WSO into the future San Joaquin Valley WFO; and
(12) Residual Las Vegas WSO into the future Las Vegas WFO.
In accordance with Public Law 102-567, the public will have 60-days
in which to comment on these proposed consolidation certifications.
DATES: Comments are requested by May 28, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the proposed consolidation packages
should be sent to Janet Gilmer, Room 12316, 1325 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephone 301-713-0276. All comments should be
sent to Janet Gilmer at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Julie Scanlon at 301-713-1413.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NWS anticipates consolidating:
(1) the Residual Indianapolis Weather Service Office (RWSO) with
the future Indianapolis WFO;
(2) the Dubuque Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Quad
Cities and Milwaukee Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
(3) the Allentown WSO with the future Philadelphia, Central
Pennsylvania and Binghamton WFOs;
(4) the Beckley WSO with the future Charleston and Roanoke WFOs;
(5) the Bridgeport WSO with the future New York City WFO;
(6) the Residual Charleston, WV WSO with the future Charleston, WV
WFO;
(7) the Elkins WSO with the future Charleston, WV, Pittsburgh and
Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC WFOs;
(8) the Huntington WSO with the future Charleston, WV and
Cincinnati WFOs;
(9) the Wilkes-Barre WSO with the future Binghamton and Central
Pennsylvania WFOs;
(10) the Residual Atlanta WSO with the future Atlanta WFO;
(11) the Bakersfield WSO with the future San Joaquin Valley WFO;
and
(12) the Residual Las Vegas WSO with the future Las Vegas WFO.
In accordance with section 706 of Pub. Law 102-567, the Secretary
of Commerce must certify that these consolidations will not result in
any degradation of service to the affected areas of responsibility and
must publish the proposed consolidation certifications in the FR. The
documentation supporting each proposed certification includes the
following:
(1) a draft memorandum by the meteorologist-in-charge recommending
the certification, the final of which will be endorsed by the Regional
Director and the Assistant Administrator of the NWS if appropriate,
after consideration of public comments and completion of consultation
with the Modernization Transition Committee (the Committee);
(2) a description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns which affect the weather services provided within the
service area;
(3) a comparison of the services provided within the service area
and the services to be provided after such action;
(4) a description of any recent or expected modernization of NWS
operation which will enhance services in the service area;
(5) an identification of any area within the affected service area
which would not receive coverage (at an elevation of 10,000 feet) by
the next generation weather radar network;
(6) evidence, based upon operational demonstration of modernized
NWS operations, which was considered in reaching the conclusion that no
degradation in service will result from such action including the WSR-
88D Radar Commissioning Report(s), User Confirmation of Services
Report(s), and the Decommissioning Readiness Report (as applicable);
and
(7) a letter appointing the liaison officer.
These proposed certifications do not include any report of the
Committee which could be submitted in accordance with sections
706(b)(6) and 707(c) of Pub. Law 102-567. At their December 14, 1995
meeting the members ``* * * resolved that the MTC modify its procedure
to eliminate proposed certification consultations of noncontroversial
closings, consolidations, relocations, and automation certifications
but will provide final consultation on certifications after public
comment and before final submission to the Secretary of Commerce.''
Documentation supporting the proposed certifications is too
voluminous to publish in its entirety. Copies of the supporting
documentation can be obtained through the contact listed above.
Attached to this Notice are draft memoranda by the respective
meteorologists-in-charge recommending the certifications.
Once all public comments have been received and considered, the NWS
will complete consultation with the Committee and determine whether to
proceed with the final certifications. If decisions to certify are
made, the Secretary of Commerce must publish the final certifications
in the FR and transmit the certifications to the appropriate
Congressional committees prior to consolidating the offices.
Dated: March 22, 1996.
Elbert W. Friday, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services.
6900 West Hanna Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46241-9526
February 12, 1996.
Memorandum For: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: John T. Curran, MIC NWSFO Indianapolis
Subject:
Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
In August 1993 a change of operations occurred when most
personnel and most services provided by the WSFO at Indianapolis
International Airport were transferred 1.5 miles southwest to the
future WFO site in Indianapolis, Indiana. At that time a Residual
Weather Service Office (RWSO) was left at the airport to continue
the surface and radar observational programs. Since that time the
Indianapolis International Airport ASOS has been commissioned and
the WSR-74C radar has been decommissioned.
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, that consolidation of the Indianapolis
Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the future Indianapolis
Weather Forecast Office (WFO) in Indianapolis will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Indianapolis service area.
This proposed
[[Page 14081]]
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
of Commerce for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the pre-
modernized Indianapolis service area is included as attachment A. As
discussed below, I find that providing the service which addresses
these characteristics and concerns from the future Indianapolis WFO
will not degrade these services.
2. A list of services currently provided from the Indianapolis
RWSO and a list of comparable services to be provided from the
future Indianapolis WFO location after consolidation is included as
attachment B. Comparison of these lists shows that all services
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the pre-modernized WSFO
Indianapolis area of responsibility (i.e. ``affected service area'')
and the future WFO Indianapolis area of responsibility. As discussed
below, I find that there will be no degradation in the quality of
these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSFO Indianapolis service area is included as
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing the planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Indiana is included as attachment D. NWS operational
radar coverage for the Indianapolis service area will be increased,
and no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of services:
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, attachment E,
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents
that all comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the
commentors as stated in the Service Confirmation Report. One of the
commentors was concerned about inaccurate radar observations (ROBs)
and substantial false echo returns. We have discussed these concerns
with those people and they are satisfied the NWS is working toward a
solution. An emergency management agency responded negatively
regarding the availability of an 800 phone line. An 800 phone line
is available to all emergency management in the Indianapolis service
area. Another emergency management official responded negatively
regarding the wording of our products and specifically mentioning
his county seat. We informed him we would specifically mention his
county seat whenever we can, if appropriate. Two other responses
were for informational purposes. We provided these individuals the
information they desired.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing WSR-74C radar is no longer needed to support
services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the
Indianapolis service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Memorandum For: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: Charles T. Fenley, MIC, NWSO Quad Cities, IA; Kenneth R.
Rizzo, MIC, NWSFO Milwaukee, WI
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Dubuque, Iowa
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Quad Cities (Davenport,
Iowa) and Milwaukee (Dousman, Wisconsin) Weather Forecast Offices
(WFOs) will not result in any degradation in weather services to the
Dubuque, Iowa, service area. This proposed certification is in
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, we are recommending you approve
this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If
you concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this
package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for
final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided to the pre-
modernized Dubuque, Iowa, service area is included as Attachment A.
As discussed below, we find that providing the services which
address these characteristics and concerns from the future Quad
Cities (Davenport, Iowa) and Milwaukee (Dousman, Wisconsin) WFOs
will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Dubuque, Iowa, service area from the Dubuque, Iowa WSO location and
a list of services to be provided from the future Quad Cities
(Davenport, Iowa) and Milwaukee (Dousman, Wisconsin) WFOs locations
after the proposed consolidation is included as Attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Dubuque, Iowa
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the
future Quad Cities (Davenport, Iowa) WFO Area of Responsibility. As
discussed below, we find that there will be no degradation in the
quality of those services as a result of consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Dubuque, Iowa, service area is included as
Attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed, and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXARD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for northeast Iowa, southwest Wisconsin and northwest
Illinois is included as Attachment D. NWS operation radar coverage
for the WSO Dubuque, Iowa, service area will be increased and no
area will be missed in coverate.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports from the Quad Cities
(Davenport, Iowa) and Milwaukee (Dousman, Wisconsin) future WFOs,
Attachment E, validates that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the Quad Cities
(Davenport, Iowa) and
[[Page 14082]]
Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dousman, Wisconsin, Attachment F, document
that no negative comments were received from the Quad Cities service
area. Only one negative comment was received from the Milwaukee
service area and it was answered to the satisfaction of the
commentor.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies
that the old WSR-74C radar at Moline, Illinois is no longer needed
to support services or products for local operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Dubuque,
Iowa service area is included as Attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (Attachment J). On
____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (Attachment K). We believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue
to recommend certification.
Endorsement
I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: G.C. Henricksen, AM/MIC NWSFO Philadelphia, PA; Bruce Budd,
MIC NWSO Central Pennsylvania, PA; Peter R. Ahnert, MIC NWSO
Binghamton, NY
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Allentown Weather
Service Office (WSO ABE) with the future Philadelphia, Central
Pennsylvania and Binghamton Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not
result in any degradation in weather services to the Allentown
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Allentown service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Philadelphia, Central
Pennsylvania, and Binghamton WFOs, will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Allentown service area from the WSO ABE location and list of
services to be provided from the future Philadelphia, Central
Pennsylvania, and Binghamton WFO locations after the proposed
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map
shows the WSO ABE Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service
Area'') and the future WFO Philadelphia Area of Responsibility. As
discussed below, we find that there will be no degradation in the
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO ABE service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Pennsylvania and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Allentown service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. the WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the
Philadelphia, Central Pennsylvania, and Binghamton areas, attachment
E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications
(acceptance test); are fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future
Philadelphia, Central Pennsylvania, and Binghamton WFO areas,
attachment F, document that a total of five comments required
follow-up. All negative comments have been answered to the
satisfaction of the users as reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissionary Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
necessary as WSO ABE does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Allentown
service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV; John Wright, MIC MWSO
Roanoke, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Beckley Weather
Service Office (WSO BKW) with the future Charleston and Roanoke
Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any degradation
in weather services to the Beckley service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, we are
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Beckley service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Charleston and Roanoke
WFOs, will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Beckley service area from the WSO BKW location and list of services
to be provided from the future Charleston and Roanoke WFO locations
after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO BKW Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Charleston Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO BKW service area is included as attachment C.
The new
[[Page 14083]]
technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be installed
and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for West Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Beckley service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Charleston
and Roanoke areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet
technical specifications (acceptance test); area fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Charleston
and Roanoke WFO areas, attachment F, document that a total of eleven
comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the
report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Beckley local warning radar, WSR-74C, is no longer
needed to support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigned the liaison officer for the Beckley
service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
__________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Michael E. Wyllie, AM/MIC NWSFO New York City
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Bridgeport Weather
Service Office (WSO BDR) with the future New York City Weather
Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather
services to the Bridgeport service area. This proposed certification
is in accordance with the advance notification provided in the
National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you
approve this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law
102-567. If you concur, please endorse this recommendation and
forward this package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather
Services for final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will
forward the certification to the Secretary for approval and
transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Bridgeport service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future New York City WFO will
not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Bridgeport service area from the WSO BDR location and a list of
services to be provided from the future New York City WFO locations
after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO BDR Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
New York city Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services
as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO BDR service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Connecticut and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Bridgeport service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from New York City,
attachment E validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from New York City,
attachment F, document that three negative comments were received.
All negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the
users as reflected in the reports.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
necessary as WSO BDR does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Bridgeport
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum for: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV; Kenneth Haydu, MIC
NWSO Cincinnati, OH
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgement, consolidation of the Huntington
Weather Service Office (WSO HTS) with the future Charleston and
Cincinnati Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Huntington service area. This
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Huntington service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Charleston and
Cincinnati WFOs, will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Huntington service area
[[Page 14084]]
from the WSO HTS location and list of services to be provided from
the future Charleston and Cincinnati WFO locations after the
proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of
these services shows that all services currently provided will
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the
enclosed map shows the WSO HTS Area of Responsibility (i.e.
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Charleston Area of
Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO HTS service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for West Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Huntington service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Charleston
and Cincinnati areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Charleston
and Cincinnati WFO areas, attachment F, document that a total of
eight comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the
report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
necessary as WSO HTS does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Huntington
service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV; Theresa Rossi, AM/MIC
NWSFO Pittsburgh, PA; James Travers, AM/MIC NWSFO Baltimore, MD/
Washington DC
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Elkins Weather
Service Office (WSO EKN) with the future Charleston, Baltimore, MD/
Washington DC and Pittsburgh Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will
not result in any degradation in weather services to the Elkins
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Elkins service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below,
we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Charleston, Baltimore,
MD/Washington DC and Pittsburgh WFOs, will not degrade these
services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Elkins service area from the WSO BKW location and list of services
to be provided from the future Charleston, Baltimore, MD/Washington
DC and Pittsburgh WFO locations after the proposed consolidation is
included as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that
all services currently provided will continue to be provided after
the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO EKN
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the
future WFO Charleston Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we
find that there will be no degradation in the quality of these
services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO EKN service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for West Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Elkins service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Charleston,
Baltimore, MD/Washington DC and Pittsburgh areas, attachment E,
validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance
test); area fully operational (satisfactory operation of system
interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting
and warning services); service backup capabilities are functioning
properly; a full set of operations and maintenance documentation is
available; and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations
and maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was
completed but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Charleston,
Baltimore, MD/Washington DC and Pittsburgh WFO areas, attachment F,
document that a total of ten comments required follow-up. All
negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the
users as reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
necessary since WSO EKN does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigned the liaison officer for the Elkins
service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
__________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
A change of operations occurred at the Charleston Weather
Service Forecast Office (WSFO), located at Yeager Airport, in May
1995 when most personnel were transferred to the facility of the
future Charleston Area Weather Forecast Office (WFO) in Ruthdale,
[[Page 14085]]
WV to operate the WSR-88D and assume forecast and warning
responsibility for the Charleston service area. At the same time the
Yeager Airport (CRW) location was designated a Residual Weather
Service Office (RWSO) to continue operating the existing WSR-74S
radar and taking surface airways observations.
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the RWSO CRW with the
future Charleston Area Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not
result in any degradation in weather services to the Charleston
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Charleston service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Charleston Area WFO
will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Charleston service area from the RWSO CRW location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Charleston WFO location
after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the RWSO CRW Area of
Responsibility (i.e., ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Charleston Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the RSWO CRW service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for West Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Charleston service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Charleston
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Charleston, attachment
F, document that four negative comments were received. All negative
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as
reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Charleston WSR-74S radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigned the liaison officer for the Charleston
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
__________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Peter Ahnert, MIC NWSO Binghamton, NY; Bruce Budd, MIC NWSO
Central Pennsylvania, PA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Wilkes-Barre
Weather Service Office (WSO BKW) with the future Binghamton and
Central Pennsylvania Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result
in any degradation in weather services to the Wilkes-Barre service
area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Wilkes-Barre service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Binghamton and Central
Pennsylvania WFOs, will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Wilkes-Barre service area from the WSO BKW location and list of
services to be provided from the future Binghamton and Central
Pennsylvania WFO locations after the proposed consolidation is
included as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that
all services currently provided will continue to be provided after
the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO AVP
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the
future WFO Binghamton Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we
find that there will be no degradation in the quality of these
services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO AVP service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Pennsylvania and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Wilkes-Barre service area will be increased and no area will be
missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Binghamton
and Central Pennsylvania areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-
88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Binghamton
and Central Pennsylvania WFO areas, attachment F, document that a
total of eleven comments required follow-up. All negative comments
have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in
the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
necessary as WSO AVP does not have a radar.
[[Page 14086]]
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Wilkes-
Barre service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
__________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Four Falcon Drive
Peachtree City, GA 30269
(date)
Memorandum For: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region
From: Carlos Garza, Jr., AM/MIC NWSFO Atlanta, GA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
A change of operations occurred at the Atlanta Weather Service
Forecast Office (WSFO) in April 1994, when most personnel were
transferred to the facility of the future Atlanta Weather Forecast
Office (WFO) in Peachtree City, Georgia, to operate the WSR-88D and
assume forecast and warning responsibility for the Atlanta service
area. The office at the original WSFO location was designated a
Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) and continued to be the site
for recording surface observations and operating the WSR-74C.
Based on the attached documentation and my professional
judgment, I have determined that consolidation of the RWSO Altanta
with the future WFO Atlanta will not result in any degradation in
weather services to the Atlanta service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending that you approve this action in accordance with Section
706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
of Commerce for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Atlanta service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services from WFO Atlanta which
address these characteristics and concerns will not degrade these
services.
2. A detailed list of services currently provided within the
Atlanta service area from the RWSO Atlanta location and a list of
services to be provided from the WFO Atlanta location after
consolidation is included in Attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. The enclosed map shows
the old Atlanta area of responsibility (i.e., ``affected service
area'') and the new future WFO Atlanta area of responsibility. As
discussed below, I find that there will be no degradation in the
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the Atlanta service area is included as Attachment C.
The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned WSR-88D radar coverage at an elevation
of 10,000 feet over Georgia is included as Attachment D. NWS
operational radar coverage for the specific service area will be
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
a. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, Attachment E,
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications
(acceptance test) and is fully operational (satisfactory operation
of system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services), service back-up capabilities are
functioning properly, and a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available, and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Two national work-arounds remain in effect.
b. The User Confirmation of Services, Attachment F, documents
that no negative comments were received. Additional calls were made
to weathercasters in the Atlanta metropolitan area to make sure that
services continue to conform to national guidelines. All comments
expressed satisfaction with our services as stated in the Service
Confirmation Report.
c. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies
that the existing Atlanta WSR-74C radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Atlanta
service area is included as Attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Attachment I) and the ____________ public
comments received during the comment period (Attachment J). On
____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (Attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
900 Foggy Bottom Road, Hanford, CA 93230-5236
February 7, 1996.
Memorandum for: W/WR--Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region
From: Steven W. Mendenhall, MIC, NWSO San Joaquin Valley, CA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Bakersfield
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future San Joaquin Valley
Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in
weather services to the Bakersfield service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Bakersfield service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future San Joaquin Valley WFO
will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Bakersfield service area from the Bakersfield WSO location and a
list of services to be provided from the future San Joaquin Valley
WFO after consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of
these services shows that all services currently provided will
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the
enclosed map shows the WSO Bakersfield Area of Responsibility (i.e.
``Affected Service Area''), and the future WFO San Joaquin Valley
Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will
be no degradation in the quality of these services as a result of
the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Bakersfield service area is included as
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and
[[Page 14087]]
AWIPS) has or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for California is included as attachment D. NWS
operational radar coverage for the Bakersfield service area will be
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report, attachment E,
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed, but one national workaround remains in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents
that one negative comment was received, but did not impact the WSO
Bakersfield service area. This negative comment was answered to the
satisfaction of the commentor, as stated in the User Confirmation of
Services Report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
needed as there is no radar to decommission at Bakersfield.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the
Bakersfield service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________
public comments received during the comment period (attachment J).
On ____________________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Potter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum For: Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region
From: Larry Jensen, MIC, NWSO Las Vegas, NV
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
A change of operations occurred at the Las Vegas Weather Service
Office (WSO) in March 1995. During this month, most personnel were
transferred to the new facility of the future Las Vegas Weather
Forecast Office (WFO) in Las Vegas, Nevada to operate the WSR-88D,
and assume forecast and warning responsibility for the Las Vegas
service area. At that same time, the original WSO office was
designated a Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) to continue
operating the WSR-74C.
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Las Vegas Residual
Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the future Las Vegas Weather
Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather
services to the Las Vegas service area. This proposed certification
is in accordance with the advance notification provided in the
National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you
approve this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law
102-567. If you concur, please endorse this recommendation and
forward this package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather
Services for final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will
forward the certification to the Secretary for approval and
transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the Las
Vegas service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below,
I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Las Vegas WFO will not
degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Las Vegas service area from the Las Vegas WSO location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Las Vegas WFO after
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclose map
shows the WSO Las Vegas Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected
Service Area'') and the future WFO Las Vegas Area of Responsibility.
Endorsement
I, Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Potter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
[FR Doc. 96-7657 Filed 3-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M