[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 62 (Friday, March 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14079-14087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-7657]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Weather Service Modernization and Associated 
Restructuring

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.


[[Page 14080]]

ACTION: Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Weather Service (NWS) is publishing proposed 
certifications for the proposed consolidations of:
    (1) Residual Indianapolis Weather Service Office (RWSO) into the 
future Indianapolis WFO;
    (2) Dubuque Weather Service Office (WSO) into the future Quad 
Cities and Milwaukee Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
    (3) Allentown WSO into the future Philadelphia, Central 
Pennsylvania and Binghamton WFOs;
    (4) Beckley WSO into the future Charleston and Roanoke WFOs;
    (5) Bridgeport WSO into the future New York City WFO;
    (6) Residual Charleston, WV WSO into the future Charleston, WV WFO;
    (7) Elkins WSO into the future Charleston, WV, Pittsburgh and 
Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC WFOs;
    (8) Huntington WSO into the future Charleston, WV and Cincinnati 
WFOs;
    (9) Wilkes-Barre WSO into the future Binghamton and Central 
Pennsylvania WFOs;
    (10) Residual Atlanta WSO into the future Atlanta WFO;
    (11) Bakersfield WSO into the future San Joaquin Valley WFO; and
    (12) Residual Las Vegas WSO into the future Las Vegas WFO.
    In accordance with Public Law 102-567, the public will have 60-days 
in which to comment on these proposed consolidation certifications.

DATES: Comments are requested by May 28, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the proposed consolidation packages 
should be sent to Janet Gilmer, Room 12316, 1325 East-West Highway, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephone 301-713-0276. All comments should be 
sent to Janet Gilmer at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Julie Scanlon at 301-713-1413.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NWS anticipates consolidating:
    (1) the Residual Indianapolis Weather Service Office (RWSO) with 
the future Indianapolis WFO;
    (2) the Dubuque Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Quad 
Cities and Milwaukee Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
    (3) the Allentown WSO with the future Philadelphia, Central 
Pennsylvania and Binghamton WFOs;
    (4) the Beckley WSO with the future Charleston and Roanoke WFOs;
    (5) the Bridgeport WSO with the future New York City WFO;
    (6) the Residual Charleston, WV WSO with the future Charleston, WV 
WFO;
    (7) the Elkins WSO with the future Charleston, WV, Pittsburgh and 
Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC WFOs;
    (8) the Huntington WSO with the future Charleston, WV and 
Cincinnati WFOs;
    (9) the Wilkes-Barre WSO with the future Binghamton and Central 
Pennsylvania WFOs;
    (10) the Residual Atlanta WSO with the future Atlanta WFO;
    (11) the Bakersfield WSO with the future San Joaquin Valley WFO; 
and
    (12) the Residual Las Vegas WSO with the future Las Vegas WFO.
    In accordance with section 706 of Pub. Law 102-567, the Secretary 
of Commerce must certify that these consolidations will not result in 
any degradation of service to the affected areas of responsibility and 
must publish the proposed consolidation certifications in the FR. The 
documentation supporting each proposed certification includes the 
following:
    (1) a draft memorandum by the meteorologist-in-charge recommending 
the certification, the final of which will be endorsed by the Regional 
Director and the Assistant Administrator of the NWS if appropriate, 
after consideration of public comments and completion of consultation 
with the Modernization Transition Committee (the Committee);
    (2) a description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns which affect the weather services provided within the 
service area;
    (3) a comparison of the services provided within the service area 
and the services to be provided after such action;
    (4) a description of any recent or expected modernization of NWS 
operation which will enhance services in the service area;
    (5) an identification of any area within the affected service area 
which would not receive coverage (at an elevation of 10,000 feet) by 
the next generation weather radar network;
    (6) evidence, based upon operational demonstration of modernized 
NWS operations, which was considered in reaching the conclusion that no 
degradation in service will result from such action including the WSR-
88D Radar Commissioning Report(s), User Confirmation of Services 
Report(s), and the Decommissioning Readiness Report (as applicable); 
and
    (7) a letter appointing the liaison officer.
    These proposed certifications do not include any report of the 
Committee which could be submitted in accordance with sections 
706(b)(6) and 707(c) of Pub. Law 102-567. At their December 14, 1995 
meeting the members ``* * * resolved that the MTC modify its procedure 
to eliminate proposed certification consultations of noncontroversial 
closings, consolidations, relocations, and automation certifications 
but will provide final consultation on certifications after public 
comment and before final submission to the Secretary of Commerce.''
    Documentation supporting the proposed certifications is too 
voluminous to publish in its entirety. Copies of the supporting 
documentation can be obtained through the contact listed above.
    Attached to this Notice are draft memoranda by the respective 
meteorologists-in-charge recommending the certifications.
    Once all public comments have been received and considered, the NWS 
will complete consultation with the Committee and determine whether to 
proceed with the final certifications. If decisions to certify are 
made, the Secretary of Commerce must publish the final certifications 
in the FR and transmit the certifications to the appropriate 
Congressional committees prior to consolidating the offices.

    Dated: March 22, 1996.
Elbert W. Friday, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services.

6900 West Hanna Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46241-9526
February 12, 1996.
Memorandum For: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: John T. Curran, MIC NWSFO Indianapolis
    Subject:
    Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    In August 1993 a change of operations occurred when most 
personnel and most services provided by the WSFO at Indianapolis 
International Airport were transferred 1.5 miles southwest to the 
future WFO site in Indianapolis, Indiana. At that time a Residual 
Weather Service Office (RWSO) was left at the airport to continue 
the surface and radar observational programs. Since that time the 
Indianapolis International Airport ASOS has been commissioned and 
the WSR-74C radar has been decommissioned.
    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, that consolidation of the Indianapolis 
Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the future Indianapolis 
Weather Forecast Office (WFO) in Indianapolis will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Indianapolis service area. 
This proposed

[[Page 14081]]
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
of Commerce for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the pre-
modernized Indianapolis service area is included as attachment A. As 
discussed below, I find that providing the service which addresses 
these characteristics and concerns from the future Indianapolis WFO 
will not degrade these services.
    2. A list of services currently provided from the Indianapolis 
RWSO and a list of comparable services to be provided from the 
future Indianapolis WFO location after consolidation is included as 
attachment B. Comparison of these lists shows that all services 
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the pre-modernized WSFO 
Indianapolis area of responsibility (i.e. ``affected service area'') 
and the future WFO Indianapolis area of responsibility. As discussed 
below, I find that there will be no degradation in the quality of 
these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSFO Indianapolis service area is included as 
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing the planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Indiana is included as attachment D. NWS operational 
radar coverage for the Indianapolis service area will be increased, 
and no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of services:
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, attachment E, 
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications 
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents 
that all comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the 
commentors as stated in the Service Confirmation Report. One of the 
commentors was concerned about inaccurate radar observations (ROBs) 
and substantial false echo returns. We have discussed these concerns 
with those people and they are satisfied the NWS is working toward a 
solution. An emergency management agency responded negatively 
regarding the availability of an 800 phone line. An 800 phone line 
is available to all emergency management in the Indianapolis service 
area. Another emergency management official responded negatively 
regarding the wording of our products and specifically mentioning 
his county seat. We informed him we would specifically mention his 
county seat whenever we can, if appropriate. Two other responses 
were for informational purposes. We provided these individuals the 
information they desired.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing WSR-74C radar is no longer needed to support 
services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the 
Indianapolis service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Memorandum For: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: Charles T. Fenley, MIC, NWSO Quad Cities, IA; Kenneth R. 
Rizzo, MIC, NWSFO Milwaukee, WI
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Dubuque, Iowa 
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Quad Cities (Davenport, 
Iowa) and Milwaukee (Dousman, Wisconsin) Weather Forecast Offices 
(WFOs) will not result in any degradation in weather services to the 
Dubuque, Iowa, service area. This proposed certification is in 
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, we are recommending you approve 
this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If 
you concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this 
package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for 
final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided to the pre-
modernized Dubuque, Iowa, service area is included as Attachment A. 
As discussed below, we find that providing the services which 
address these characteristics and concerns from the future Quad 
Cities (Davenport, Iowa) and Milwaukee (Dousman, Wisconsin) WFOs 
will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Dubuque, Iowa, service area from the Dubuque, Iowa WSO location and 
a list of services to be provided from the future Quad Cities 
(Davenport, Iowa) and Milwaukee (Dousman, Wisconsin) WFOs locations 
after the proposed consolidation is included as Attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Dubuque, Iowa 
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the 
future Quad Cities (Davenport, Iowa) WFO Area of Responsibility. As 
discussed below, we find that there will be no degradation in the 
quality of those services as a result of consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Dubuque, Iowa, service area is included as 
Attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed, and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXARD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for northeast Iowa, southwest Wisconsin and northwest 
Illinois is included as Attachment D. NWS operation radar coverage 
for the WSO Dubuque, Iowa, service area will be increased and no 
area will be missed in coverate.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports from the Quad Cities 
(Davenport, Iowa) and Milwaukee (Dousman, Wisconsin) future WFOs, 
Attachment E, validates that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the Quad Cities 
(Davenport, Iowa) and

[[Page 14082]]
Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Dousman, Wisconsin, Attachment F, document 
that no negative comments were received from the Quad Cities service 
area. Only one negative comment was received from the Milwaukee 
service area and it was answered to the satisfaction of the 
commentor.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies 
that the old WSR-74C radar at Moline, Illinois is no longer needed 
to support services or products for local operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Dubuque, 
Iowa service area is included as Attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (Attachment J). On 
____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (Attachment K). We believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue 
to recommend certification.

Endorsement

    I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: G.C. Henricksen, AM/MIC NWSFO Philadelphia, PA; Bruce Budd, 
MIC NWSO Central Pennsylvania, PA; Peter R. Ahnert, MIC NWSO 
Binghamton, NY
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Allentown Weather 
Service Office (WSO ABE) with the future Philadelphia, Central 
Pennsylvania and Binghamton Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not 
result in any degradation in weather services to the Allentown 
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the 
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Allentown service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Philadelphia, Central 
Pennsylvania, and Binghamton WFOs, will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Allentown service area from the WSO ABE location and list of 
services to be provided from the future Philadelphia, Central 
Pennsylvania, and Binghamton WFO locations after the proposed 
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map 
shows the WSO ABE Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service 
Area'') and the future WFO Philadelphia Area of Responsibility. As 
discussed below, we find that there will be no degradation in the 
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO ABE service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Pennsylvania and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Allentown service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. the WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the 
Philadelphia, Central Pennsylvania, and Binghamton areas, attachment 
E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications 
(acceptance test); are fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future 
Philadelphia, Central Pennsylvania, and Binghamton WFO areas, 
attachment F, document that a total of five comments required 
follow-up. All negative comments have been answered to the 
satisfaction of the users as reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissionary Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
necessary as WSO ABE does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Allentown 
service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV; John Wright, MIC MWSO 
Roanoke, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Beckley Weather 
Service Office (WSO BKW) with the future Charleston and Roanoke 
Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any degradation 
in weather services to the Beckley service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, we are 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Beckley service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Charleston and Roanoke 
WFOs, will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Beckley service area from the WSO BKW location and list of services 
to be provided from the future Charleston and Roanoke WFO locations 
after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO BKW Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Charleston Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO BKW service area is included as attachment C. 
The new

[[Page 14083]]
technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be installed 
and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for West Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Beckley service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Charleston 
and Roanoke areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet 
technical specifications (acceptance test); area fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Charleston 
and Roanoke WFO areas, attachment F, document that a total of eleven 
comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been 
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the 
report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Beckley local warning radar, WSR-74C, is no longer 
needed to support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigned the liaison officer for the Beckley 
service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
__________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Michael E. Wyllie, AM/MIC NWSFO New York City
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Bridgeport Weather 
Service Office (WSO BDR) with the future New York City Weather 
Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather 
services to the Bridgeport service area. This proposed certification 
is in accordance with the advance notification provided in the 
National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you 
approve this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 
102-567. If you concur, please endorse this recommendation and 
forward this package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather 
Services for final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will 
forward the certification to the Secretary for approval and 
transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Bridgeport service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future New York City WFO will 
not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Bridgeport service area from the WSO BDR location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future New York City WFO locations 
after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO BDR Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
New York city Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find 
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services 
as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO BDR service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Connecticut and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Bridgeport service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from New York City, 
attachment E validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from New York City, 
attachment F, document that three negative comments were received. 
All negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the 
users as reflected in the reports.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
necessary as WSO BDR does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Bridgeport 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum for: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV; Kenneth Haydu, MIC 
NWSO Cincinnati, OH
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgement, consolidation of the Huntington 
Weather Service Office (WSO HTS) with the future Charleston and 
Cincinnati Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Huntington service area. This 
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Huntington service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Charleston and 
Cincinnati WFOs, will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Huntington service area

[[Page 14084]]
from the WSO HTS location and list of services to be provided from 
the future Charleston and Cincinnati WFO locations after the 
proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of 
these services shows that all services currently provided will 
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the 
enclosed map shows the WSO HTS Area of Responsibility (i.e. 
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Charleston Area of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO HTS service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for West Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Huntington service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Charleston 
and Cincinnati areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet 
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Charleston 
and Cincinnati WFO areas, attachment F, document that a total of 
eight comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been 
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the 
report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
necessary as WSO HTS does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Huntington 
service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV; Theresa Rossi, AM/MIC 
NWSFO Pittsburgh, PA; James Travers, AM/MIC NWSFO Baltimore, MD/
Washington DC
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Elkins Weather 
Service Office (WSO EKN) with the future Charleston, Baltimore, MD/
Washington DC and Pittsburgh Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will 
not result in any degradation in weather services to the Elkins 
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the 
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Elkins service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below, 
we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Charleston, Baltimore, 
MD/Washington DC and Pittsburgh WFOs, will not degrade these 
services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Elkins service area from the WSO BKW location and list of services 
to be provided from the future Charleston, Baltimore, MD/Washington 
DC and Pittsburgh WFO locations after the proposed consolidation is 
included as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that 
all services currently provided will continue to be provided after 
the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO EKN 
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the 
future WFO Charleston Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we 
find that there will be no degradation in the quality of these 
services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO EKN service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for West Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Elkins service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Charleston, 
Baltimore, MD/Washington DC and Pittsburgh areas, attachment E, 
validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance 
test); area fully operational (satisfactory operation of system 
interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting 
and warning services); service backup capabilities are functioning 
properly; a full set of operations and maintenance documentation is 
available; and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations 
and maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was 
completed but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Charleston, 
Baltimore, MD/Washington DC and Pittsburgh WFO areas, attachment F, 
document that a total of ten comments required follow-up. All 
negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the 
users as reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
necessary since WSO EKN does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigned the liaison officer for the Elkins 
service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
__________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    A change of operations occurred at the Charleston Weather 
Service Forecast Office (WSFO), located at Yeager Airport, in May 
1995 when most personnel were transferred to the facility of the 
future Charleston Area Weather Forecast Office (WFO) in Ruthdale,

[[Page 14085]]
WV to operate the WSR-88D and assume forecast and warning 
responsibility for the Charleston service area. At the same time the 
Yeager Airport (CRW) location was designated a Residual Weather 
Service Office (RWSO) to continue operating the existing WSR-74S 
radar and taking surface airways observations.
    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the RWSO CRW with the 
future Charleston Area Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not 
result in any degradation in weather services to the Charleston 
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the 
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance 
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please 
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Charleston service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Charleston Area WFO 
will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Charleston service area from the RWSO CRW location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Charleston WFO location 
after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the RWSO CRW Area of 
Responsibility (i.e., ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Charleston Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the RSWO CRW service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for West Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Charleston service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Charleston 
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Charleston, attachment 
F, document that four negative comments were received. All negative 
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as 
reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Charleston WSR-74S radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigned the liaison officer for the Charleston 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
__________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Peter Ahnert, MIC NWSO Binghamton, NY; Bruce Budd, MIC NWSO 
Central Pennsylvania, PA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Wilkes-Barre 
Weather Service Office (WSO BKW) with the future Binghamton and 
Central Pennsylvania Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result 
in any degradation in weather services to the Wilkes-Barre service 
area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Wilkes-Barre service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Binghamton and Central 
Pennsylvania WFOs, will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Wilkes-Barre service area from the WSO BKW location and list of 
services to be provided from the future Binghamton and Central 
Pennsylvania WFO locations after the proposed consolidation is 
included as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that 
all services currently provided will continue to be provided after 
the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO AVP 
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the 
future WFO Binghamton Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we 
find that there will be no degradation in the quality of these 
services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO AVP service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Pennsylvania and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Wilkes-Barre service area will be increased and no area will be 
missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Binghamton 
and Central Pennsylvania areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-
88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully 
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and 
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Binghamton 
and Central Pennsylvania WFO areas, attachment F, document that a 
total of eleven comments required follow-up. All negative comments 
have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in 
the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
necessary as WSO AVP does not have a radar.

[[Page 14086]]

    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Wilkes-
Barre service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
__________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Four Falcon Drive
Peachtree City, GA 30269
(date)

Memorandum For: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region
From: Carlos Garza, Jr., AM/MIC NWSFO Atlanta, GA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    A change of operations occurred at the Atlanta Weather Service 
Forecast Office (WSFO) in April 1994, when most personnel were 
transferred to the facility of the future Atlanta Weather Forecast 
Office (WFO) in Peachtree City, Georgia, to operate the WSR-88D and 
assume forecast and warning responsibility for the Atlanta service 
area. The office at the original WSFO location was designated a 
Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) and continued to be the site 
for recording surface observations and operating the WSR-74C.
    Based on the attached documentation and my professional 
judgment, I have determined that consolidation of the RWSO Altanta 
with the future WFO Atlanta will not result in any degradation in 
weather services to the Atlanta service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending that you approve this action in accordance with Section 
706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
of Commerce for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Atlanta service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services from WFO Atlanta which 
address these characteristics and concerns will not degrade these 
services.
    2. A detailed list of services currently provided within the 
Atlanta service area from the RWSO Atlanta location and a list of 
services to be provided from the WFO Atlanta location after 
consolidation is included in Attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. The enclosed map shows 
the old Atlanta area of responsibility (i.e., ``affected service 
area'') and the new future WFO Atlanta area of responsibility. As 
discussed below, I find that there will be no degradation in the 
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the Atlanta service area is included as Attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned WSR-88D radar coverage at an elevation 
of 10,000 feet over Georgia is included as Attachment D. NWS 
operational radar coverage for the specific service area will be 
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    a. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, Attachment E, 
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications 
(acceptance test) and is fully operational (satisfactory operation 
of system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services), service back-up capabilities are 
functioning properly, and a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available, and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    b. The User Confirmation of Services, Attachment F, documents 
that no negative comments were received. Additional calls were made 
to weathercasters in the Atlanta metropolitan area to make sure that 
services continue to conform to national guidelines. All comments 
expressed satisfaction with our services as stated in the Service 
Confirmation Report.
    c. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Atlanta WSR-74C radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Atlanta 
service area is included as Attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (Attachment J). On 
____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (Attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

900 Foggy Bottom Road, Hanford, CA 93230-5236
February 7, 1996.
Memorandum for: W/WR--Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region
From: Steven W. Mendenhall, MIC, NWSO San Joaquin Valley, CA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Bakersfield 
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future San Joaquin Valley 
Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in 
weather services to the Bakersfield service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Bakersfield service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future San Joaquin Valley WFO 
will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Bakersfield service area from the Bakersfield WSO location and a 
list of services to be provided from the future San Joaquin Valley 
WFO after consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of 
these services shows that all services currently provided will 
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the 
enclosed map shows the WSO Bakersfield Area of Responsibility (i.e. 
``Affected Service Area''), and the future WFO San Joaquin Valley 
Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will 
be no degradation in the quality of these services as a result of 
the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Bakersfield service area is included as 
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and

[[Page 14087]]
AWIPS) has or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for California is included as attachment D. NWS 
operational radar coverage for the Bakersfield service area will be 
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report, attachment E, 
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications 
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed, but one national workaround remains in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents 
that one negative comment was received, but did not impact the WSO 
Bakersfield service area. This negative comment was answered to the 
satisfaction of the commentor, as stated in the User Confirmation of 
Services Report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
needed as there is no radar to decommission at Bakersfield.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the 
Bakersfield service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________ 
public comments received during the comment period (attachment J). 
On ____________________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Potter

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum For: Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region
From: Larry Jensen, MIC, NWSO Las Vegas, NV
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    A change of operations occurred at the Las Vegas Weather Service 
Office (WSO) in March 1995. During this month, most personnel were 
transferred to the new facility of the future Las Vegas Weather 
Forecast Office (WFO) in Las Vegas, Nevada to operate the WSR-88D, 
and assume forecast and warning responsibility for the Las Vegas 
service area. At that same time, the original WSO office was 
designated a Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) to continue 
operating the WSR-74C.
    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Las Vegas Residual 
Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the future Las Vegas Weather 
Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather 
services to the Las Vegas service area. This proposed certification 
is in accordance with the advance notification provided in the 
National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you 
approve this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 
102-567. If you concur, please endorse this recommendation and 
forward this package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather 
Services for final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will 
forward the certification to the Secretary for approval and 
transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the Las 
Vegas service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below, 
I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Las Vegas WFO will not 
degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Las Vegas service area from the Las Vegas WSO location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Las Vegas WFO after 
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclose map 
shows the WSO Las Vegas Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected 
Service Area'') and the future WFO Las Vegas Area of Responsibility.

Endorsement

    I, Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Potter

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

[FR Doc. 96-7657 Filed 3-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M