[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 52 (Friday, March 15, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10703-10706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-6192]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 95-CE-83-AD]
Airworthiness Directives; JanAero Devices (formerly Janitrol,
C&D, FL Aerospace, and Midland-Ross Corporation) B series combustion
heaters, Models B1500, B2030, B3040, and B4050
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to supersede AD 82-07-03, which
currently requires repetitively testing (pressure decay) JanAero
Devices B-Series combustion heaters, Models B1500, B2030, B3040, and
B4050, that are installed on aircraft, and overhauling any heater that
does not pass one of these pressure decay tests. The proposed action
would retain these pressure decay tests and possible heater overhaul;
and would require repetitive
[[Page 10704]]
operational testing of the combustion air pressure switch, and
replacing any combustion pressure switch that does not pass one of
these tests. Two occurrences of failure of the affected heaters
prompted the proposed action. In one case, an explosion resulted and
the baggage compartment door was blown off the airplane. In the other
case, a fire occurred in the baggage compartment while the airplane was
in flight. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to
prevent an airplane fire or explosion caused by failure of the heater
combustion tube assembly or combustion air pressure switch.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 17, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief
Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-83-AD, Room 1558, 601 E.
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at
this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
holidays excepted.
Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained
from JanAero Devices, P.O. Box 273, Fort Deposit, Alabama; telephone
(334) 227-8306; facsimile (334) 227-8596. This information also may be
examined at the Rules Docket at the address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Linda Haynes, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, Campus Building, 1701
Columbia Avenue, suite 2-160, College Park, Georgia 30337-2748;
telephone (404) 305-7377; facsimile (404) 305-7348.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned
with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket No. 95-CE-83-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-83-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
Discussion
AD 82-07-03, Amendment 39-4354, currently requires repetitively
testing (pressure decay) JanAero Devices B- Series combustion heaters,
Models B1500, B2030, B3040, and B4050, that are installed on aircraft,
and overhauling any heater that does not pass one of these pressure
decay tests.
The FAA has received reports of two occurrences of failure of the
affected heaters. In one case, an explosion resulted and the baggage
compartment door was blown off the airplane. In the other case, a fire
occurred in the nose baggage compartment while the airplane was in
flight. Investigation of these occurrences revealed malfunction of the
combustion air pressure switch on the affected heaters.
The function of this switch is to sense a minimum combustion air
differential pressure or airflow and then activate a spark ignition to
the coil and fuel solenoid valve. The problem is that with the contacts
closed, fuel flow and ignition occur without proper airflow, resulting
in a possible explosive ignition.
JanAero Devices has developed a new combustion air pressure switch,
which, when incorporated on one of the affected combustion heaters,
eliminates the electrical contact in the closed position utilized in
the old design switch. Procedures for incorporating these parts of
improved design are included in JanAero Devices Service Bulletin (SB) #
A-102, dated September 1994. In addition, JanAero devices has
incorporated improved design ceramic combustion tubes into new heater
assemblies.
After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available
information related to the incidents described above, including the
referenced service information, the FAA has determined that (1) the
repetitive inspections required by AD 82-07-03 are still needed for
JanAero Devices B-Series combustion heaters, Models B1500, B2030,
B3040, and B4050, installed on aircraft; (2) the combustion air
pressure switches of the affected combustion heaters should be
repetitively inspected until a new switch of improved design is
installed; and (3) AD action should be taken to prevent an airplane
fire or explosion caused by failure of the heater combustion tube
assembly or combustion air pressure switch.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop in other JanAero Devices B-Series combustion heaters,
Models B1500, B2030, B3040, and B4050 of the same type design installed
in aircraft, the proposed AD would supersede AD 82-07-03 with a new AD
that would (1) retain the requirements of repetitively testing
(pressure decay), and overhauling any heater that does not pass one of
these pressure decay tests; (2) require repetitive operational testing
of the combustion air pressure switch, and replacing any combustion
pressure switch that does not pass one of these tests; and (3) provide
the option of installing a combustion air pressure switch of improved
design as terminating action for the repetitive operational tests.
Accomplishment of the proposed actions would be as follows:
--the pressure decay tests, combustion air pressure switch operational
tests, and possible heater overhaul in accordance with the Overhaul and
Maintenance Manual; and
--the improved design combustion air pressure switch installation in
accordance with JanAero Devices SB # A-102, dated September 1994.
The compliance times of the proposed AD are presented in both hours
time-in-service and calendar time (with the prevalent one being
whichever occurs first). The reason for the proposed dual compliance
time is that the affected combustion heaters are susceptible to
corrosion (occurs regardless of whether the airplane is in flight or on
the ground) as well as being affected by thermodynamic and pressure
cycles accumulated through regular airplane usage.
The FAA estimates that 25,700 aircraft in the U.S. registry have
the affected heaters installed and, thus would be affected by the
proposed AD,
[[Page 10705]]
that it would take approximately 1 workhour per aircraft to accomplish
the proposed initial inspection, and that the average labor rate is
approximately $60 an hour. Based on these figures, the total cost
impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$1,542,000 or $60 per aircraft. This figure does not take into account
the number of repetitive inspections each aircraft owner/operator would
incur over the life of the aircraft, or the number of aircraft that
have an improved design combustion air pressure switch installed. The
FAA has no way of determining the number of repetitive inspections each
owner/operator would incur over the life of the aircraft. The FAA is
not aware of any affected owner/operator that has incorporated the new
design parts as of publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking.
AD 82-03-07 currently requires the pressure decay tests on aircraft
with the affected heaters installed. This action maintains these
inspections; so the only cost impact of the proposed action is that of
the combustion air pressure switch operational tests.
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated,
will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation
prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of
it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location
provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14
CFR part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 82-07-03, Amendment 39-4354, and by adding a new AD to read as
follows:
Janaero Devices (formerly Janitrol, C&D, FL Aerospace, and Midland-
Ross Corporation): Docket No. 95-CE-83-AD; Supersedes AD 82-07-03,
Amendment 39-4354.
Applicability: B-Series combustion heaters, Models B1500, B2030,
B3040, and B4050, marked as meeting the standards of TSO-C20, that
do not incorporate a ceramic combustion tube and a part number (P/N)
94E42 combustion air pressure switch, and are installed on, but not
limited to, the following aircraft (all serial numbers),
certificated in any category:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Models and series model
Manufacturer airplanes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beech................................. Models 95-B55 Series, 58, 58TC,
58P, 60, A60, and 76.
Canadair.............................. Models CL-215, CL-215T, and CLT-
415.
Cessna................................ Models 208, 303, 310F, 310G,
310H, 310I, 310J, 310K, 310L,
310M, 310N, 310O, 310P, 320C,
320D, 320E, 320F, 337 series,
340 340A, 414, 414A, 421, 421A,
421B, and 421C.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 1: This AD applies to each aircraft identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it. Compliance: Required as follows, as applicable:
--For aircraft with 450 or more heater hours time- in-service (TIS)
(see Note 2 for information on how to determine heater hours TIS)
accumulated on an installed heater since the last overhaul or new
installation, within the next 50 heater hours TIS or 12 calendar
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first,
unless already accomplished, and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 100 heater hours TIS or 24 calendar months, whichever occurs
first;
--For aircraft with less than 450 heater hours TIS accumulated on an
installed heater since the last overhaul or new installation, upon
accumulating 500 heater hours TIS on the new or overhauled heater or
within the next 12 calendar months after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs first, unless already accomplished, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 heater hours TIS or 24
calendar months, whichever occurs first; and
--Upon installing one of the affected heaters, and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 100 heater hours TIS or 24 calendar months,
whichever occurs first.
Note 2: A heater hour meter may be used to determine heater
hours TIS. Also, aircraft hours TIS may be divided in half to come
up with heater hours TIS.
To prevent an airplane fire or explosion caused by failure of
the heater combustion tube assembly or combustion air pressure
switch, accomplish the following:
(a) Test (pressure decay test) the combustion tube of the heater
and conduct an operational test of the combustion air pressure
switch in accordance with Section III, paragraph 3.3.1 through
3.3.13 (pressure decay test) and Section IV, paragraph 4.9c
(operational switch test), of the Janitrol Maintenance and Overhaul
Manual, part number (P/N) 24E25-1, dated October 1981.
(1) If any heater does not pass any of the repetitive combustion
tube pressure decay tests required by this AD, prior to further
flight, overhaul the heater and replace the combustion tube with a
serviceable tube or replace the heater assembly. If the new or
rebuilt heater assembly incorporates a ceramic combustion tube, then
the repetitive pressure decay tests are no longer required.
(2) If any heater does not pass any of the repetitive combustion
air pressure switch operational tests required by this AD, prior to
further flight, replace the switch with one of the same design or
with a P/N 94E42 switch. Replacing the combustion air pressure
switch with a P/N 94E42 switch eliminates the repetitive operational
testing requirement of this AD.
(b) As an alternative method of compliance to the requirements
of this AD, the heater may be disabled by accomplishing the
following:
(1) Cap the fuel supply line;
[[Page 10706]]
(2) Disconnect the electrical power and ensure that the
connections are properly secured to reduce the possibility of
electrical spark or structural damage;
(3) Inspect and test to ensure that the cabin heater system is
disabled;
(4) Ensure that no other aircraft system is affected by this
action;
(5) Ensure there are no fuel leaks; and
(6) Fabricate a placard with the words: ``System Inoperative''.
Install this placard at the heater control valve within the pilot's
clear view.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be
approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), Campus Building, 1701 Columbia Avenue, suite 2-160, College
Park, Georgia 30337-2748. The request shall be forwarded through an
appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then
send it to the Manager, Atlanta ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Atlanta ACO.
(e) Alternative methods of compliance for the combustion tube
repetitive inspections required by this AD that are approved in
accordance with AD 82-07-03 (superseded by this action) are approved
as alternative methods of compliance with the applilcable portion of
paragraph (a) of this AD.
(f) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of
the document referred to herein upon request to The New Piper
Aircraft, Inc., 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960; or may
examine this document at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the
Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106.
(g) This amendment supersedes AD 82-07-03, Amendment 39-4354.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 11, 1996.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 96-6192 Filed 3-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U