[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5744-5752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-3380]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Weather Service Modernization and Associated 
Restructuring

ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Weather Service (NWS) is publishing proposed 
certifications for the proposed consolidations of:
    (1) Residual Portland, ME Weather Service Office (RWSO) into the 
future Portland, ME WFO;
    (2) Concord Weather Service Office (WSO) into the future Portland, 
ME and Boston Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
    (3) Mansfield WSO into the future Cleveland WFO;
    (4) Youngstown WSO into the future Cleveland and Pittsburgh WFOs;
    (5) Dayton WSO into the future Cincinnati WFO;
    (6) Toledo WSO into the future Cleveland and Cincinnati WFOs;
    (7) Lynchburg WSO into the future Roanoke WFO;
    (8) Roanoke WSO into the future Roanoke WFO;
    (9) Cape Hatteras WSO into the future Morehead City and Wakefield 
WFOs;
    (10) Akron WSO into the future Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and 
Charleston, WV WFOs;
    (11) Columbus, OH WSO into the future Cincinnati, Cleveland, 
Pittsburgh, and Charleston, WV WFOs;

[[Page 5745]]

    (12) Harrisburg WSO into the future Central Pennsylvania WFO; and
    (13) Williamsport WSO into the future Central Pennsylvania and 
Binghamton WFOs.
    In accordance with Public Law 102-567, the public will have 60-days 
in which to comment on these proposed consolidation certifications.

DATES: Comments are requested by April 15, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the proposed consolidation packages 
should be sent to Janet Gilmer, Room 12316, 1325 East-West Highway, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephone 301-713-0276. All comments should be 
sent to Janet Gilmer at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Scanlon at 301-713-1413.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: NWS anticipates consolidating:
    (1) The Residual Portland, ME Weather Service Forecast Office 
(WSFO) with the future Portland, ME WFO;
    (2) The Concord Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future 
Portland, ME and Boston Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
    (3) The Mansfield WSO with the future Cleveland WFO;
    (4) The Youngstown WSO with the future Cleveland and Pittsburgh 
WFOs;
    (5) The Dayton WSO with the future Cincinnati WFO;
    (6) The Toledo WSO with the future Cleveland and Cincinnati WFOs;
    (7) The Lynchburg WSO with the future Roanoke WFO;
    (8) The Roanoke WSO with the future Roanoke WFO;
    (9) The Cape Hatteras WSO with the future Morehead City and 
Wakefield WFOs;
    (10) The Akron WSO with the future Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and 
Charleston, WV WFOs;
    (11) The Columbus, OH WSO with the future Cincinnati, Cleveland, 
Pittsburgh, and Charleston, WV WFOs;
    (12) The Harrisburg WSO with the future Central Pennsylvania WFO; 
and
    (13) The Williamsport WSO with the future Central Pennsylvania and 
Binghamton WFOs.
    In accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567, the Secretary 
of Commerce must certify that these consolidations will not result in 
any degradation of service to the affected areas of responsibility and 
must publish the proposed consolidation certifications in the FR. The 
documentation supporting each proposed certification includes the 
following:
    (1) A draft memorandum by the meteorologist-in-charge recommending 
the certification, the final of which will be endorsed by the Regional 
Director and the Assistant Administrator of the NWS if appropriate, 
after consideration of public comments and completion of consultation 
with the Modernization Transition Committee (the Committee);
    (2) A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns which affect the weather services provided within the 
service area;
    (3) A comparison of the services provided within the service area 
and the services to be provided after such action;
    (4) A description of any recent or expected modernization of NWS 
operation which will enhance services in the service area;
    (5) An identification of any area within the affected service area 
which would not receive coverage (at an elevation of 10,000 feet) by 
the next generation weather radar network;
    (6) Evidence, based upon operational demonstration of modernized 
NWS operations, which was considered reaching the conclusion that no 
degradation in service will result from such action including the WSR-
88D Radar Commissioning Report(s), User Confirmation of Services 
Report(s), and the Decommissioning Readiness Report (as applicable); 
and
    (7) A letter appointing the liaison officer.
    These proposed certifications do not include any report of the 
Committee which could be submitted in accordance with sections 
706(b)(6) and 707(c) of Public Law 102-567. At their December 14, 1995 
meeting the members ``* * * resolved that the MTC modify its procedure 
to eliminate proposed certification consultations of noncontroversial 
closings, consolidations, relocations, and automation certifications 
but will provide final consultation on certifications after public 
comment and before final submission to the Secretary of Commerce.''
    Documentation supporting the proposed certifications is too 
voluminous to publish in its entirety. Copies of the supporting 
documentation can be obtained through the contact listed above.
    Attached to this Notice are draft memoranda by the respective 
meteorologists-in-charge recommending the certifications.
    Once all public comments have been received and considered, the NWS 
will complete consultation with the Committee and determine whether to 
proceed with the final certifications. If decisions to certify are 
made, the Secretary of Commerce must publish the final certifications 
in the FR and transmit the certifications to the appropriate 
Congressional committees prior to consolidating the offices.

    Dated: February 7, 1996.
Elbert W. Friday, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services.

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Albert W. Wheeler, AM/MIC NWSFO Portland, ME
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    A change of operations occurred at the Portland Weather Service 
Forecast Office (WSFO), located at the Portland Jet Port, in 
September 1994 when most personnel were transferred to the facility 
of the future Portland Area Weather Forecast Office (WFO) in Gray, 
Maine to operate the WSR-88D and assume forecast and warning 
responsibility for the Portland service area. At the same time the 
Portland Jet Port (PWM) location was designated a Residual Weather 
Service Office (RWSO) to continue operating the existing WSR-74S 
radar and taking surface airways observations.
    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the RWSO PWM with the 
future Portland Area Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result 
in any degradation in weather services to the Portland service area. 
This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance 
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please 
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Portland service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Portland Area WFO will 
not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Portland service area from the RWSO PWM location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Portland area WFO location 
after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the RWSO PWM Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Portland Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that 
there will be no degradation in the 

[[Page 5746]]
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the RWSO PWM service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOC, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Maine and portions of surrounding areas is included 
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Portland 
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Portland 
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Portland, attachment 
F, document that four negative comments were received. Three of 
these comments related to the Portland service area. All negative 
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as 
reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Portland WSR-74S radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Portland 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ______ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ______, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
    Albert W. Wheeler, AM/MIC NWSFO Portland, ME
    Robert M. Thompson, AM/MIC NWSFO Boston, MA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Concord Weather 
Service Office (WSO CON) with the future Portland Weather Forecast 
Office (WFO) and the future Boston WFO, will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Concord service area. This 
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
     1.A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Concord service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Portland and Boston 
WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Concord service area from the WSO CON location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Portland and Boston WFO 
locations after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment 
B. Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO CON Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Portland Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO CON service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for New Hampshire and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Concord service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Portland and 
Boston areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet 
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Portland and Boston, 
attachment F, document that four negative comments were received 
from the Portland area and two negative responses were received for 
the Boston area. None of the negative comments pertained to the 
Concord area. All negative comments have been answered to the 
satisfaction of the users as reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
required as WSO CON did not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Concord 
service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certificate.
John T. Forsing

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: William Comeaux, AM/MIC NWSFO Cleveland, OH
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Mansfield Weather 
Service Office (WSO MFD) with the future Cleveland Weather Forecast 
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services 
to the Mansfield service area. This proposed certification is in 
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this 
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you 
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package 
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Mansfield service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that 

[[Page 5747]]
providing the services which address these characteristics and concerns 
from the future Cleveland WFO will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Mansfield service area from the WSO MFD location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Cleveland WFO location after 
the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison 
of these services shows that all services currently provided will 
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the 
enclosed map shows the WSO MFD Area of Responsibility (i.e. 
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Cleveland Area of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO MFD service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOC, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included 
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Mansfield 
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Cleveland 
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Cleveland, attachment 
F, document that seven responses required full-up. All negative 
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as 
reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
needed as WSO MFD does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Mansfield 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ______ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ______, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
    William Comeaux, AM/MIC NWSFO Cleveland, OH
    Theresa Rossi, AM/MIC NWSFO Pittsburgh, PA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Youngstown 
Weather Service Office (WSO YNG) with the future Cleveland and 
Pittsburgh Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Youngstown service area. This 
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary.
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Youngstown service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Cleveland and 
Pittsburgh WFOs, will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of services currently provided within the 
Youngstown service area from the WSO YNG location and list of 
services to be provided from the future Cleveland and Pittsburgh 
WFOs locations after the proposed consolidation is included as 
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services 
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO YNG Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Cleveland Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO YNG service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included 
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Youngstown 
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from the Cleveland and 
Pittsburgh areas, attachment E. validate that the WSR-88Ds meet 
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Cleveland 
and Pittsburgh WFO areas, attachment F, document that a total of 10 
comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been 
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the 
report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
necessary since WSO YNG does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Youngstown 
service area in included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________, public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation 
(attachment K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed 
to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend 
this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Kenneth J. Haydu, MIC NWSO Cincinnati, OH
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Dayton Weather 
Service Office (WSO DAY) with the future Cincinnati Weather Forecast 
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services 
to the Dayton service area. This proposed certification is in 
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this 
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you 
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package 
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.

[[Page 5748]]

    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Dayton service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below, 
I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Cincinnati WFO, will 
not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Dayton service area from the WSO DAY location and list of services 
to be provided from the future Cincinnati WFO locations after the 
proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of 
these services shows that all services currently provided will 
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the 
enclosed map shows the WSO DAY Area of Responsibility (i.e. 
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Cincinnati Area of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO DAY service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included 
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Dayton 
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from the Cincinnati 
areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Cincinnati 
WFO areas, attachment F, document that four comments required 
follow-up. All negative comments have been answered to the 
satisfaction of the users as reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
needed as WSO DAY does not have radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Dayton 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
    William Comeaux, AM/MIC NWSFO Cleveland, OH
    Kenneth J. Haydu, MIC NWSO Cincinnati, OH
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgement, consolidation of the Toledo Weather 
Service Office (WSO TOL) with the future Cincinnati and Cleveland 
Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any degradation 
in weather services to the Toledo service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, we are 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Toledo service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below, 
we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Cincinnati and 
Cleveland WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Toledo service area from the WSO TOL location and list of services 
to be provided from the future Cincinnati and Cleveland WFO 
locations after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment 
B. Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO TOL Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Cleveland Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO TOL service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included 
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Toledo 
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from Cincinnati and 
Cleveland areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet 
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Cincinnati 
and Cleveland WFO areas, attachment F, document that a total of 11 
comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been 
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the 
report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
necessary since WSO TOL does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Toledo 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: John V. Wright, MIC NWSO Roanoke, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Lynchburg Weather 
Service Office (WSO LYH) with the future Roanoke Weather Forecast 
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services 
to the Lynchburg service area. This proposed 

[[Page 5749]]
certification is in accordance with the advance notification provided 
in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending 
you approve this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 
102-567. If you concur, please endorse this recommendation and 
forward this package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather 
Services for final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will 
forward the certification to the Secretary for approval and 
transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Lynchburg service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Roanoke WFO will not 
degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Lynchburg service area from the WSO LYH location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Roanoke WFO location after 
the proposed consolidation is included in attachment B. Comparison 
of these services shows that all services currently provided will 
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the 
enclosed map shows the WSO Lynchburg Area of Responsibility (i.e. 
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Roanoke Area of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO LYH service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Lynchburg service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Roanoke 
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Roanoke WFO 
area, attachment F, document that seven comments required follow-up. 
All negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the 
users as reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
needed as WSO LYH does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Lynchburg 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ______ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ______, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: John V. Wright, MIC NWSO Roanoke, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Roanoke Weather 
Service Office (WSO ROA) with the future Roanoke Weather Forecast 
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services 
to the Roanoke service area. This proposed certification is in 
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this 
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you 
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package 
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Roanoke service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Roanoke WFO will not 
degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Roanoke service area from the WSO ROA location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Roanoke WFO location after 
the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison 
of these services shows that all services currently provided will 
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the 
enclosed map shows the WSO ROA Area of Responsibility (i.e. 
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Roanoke Area of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO ROA service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Roanoke service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Roanoke 
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Roanoke WFO 
area, attachment F, document that seven responses required follow-
up. All negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of 
the users as reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
needed as WSO ROA does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Roanoke 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
    Thomas E. Kriehn, MIC NWSO Morehead City, NC
    
[[Page 5750]]

    Anthony L. Siebers, MIC MWSO Wakefield, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgement, consolidation of the Weather Service 
Office Cape Hatteras, NC (WSO HAT) with the future Weather Forecast 
Offices (WFOs) Morehead City, NC and Wakefield, VA, will not result 
in any degradation in weather services to the Cape Hatteras service 
area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the Cape 
Hatteras service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Morehead City and 
Wakefield WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Cape Hatteras service area from the WSO HAT location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Morehead City and Wakefield 
WFO locations after the proposed consolidation is included as 
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services 
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO HAT Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future 
Morehead City WFO Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we 
find that there will be no degradation in the quality of these 
services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO HAT service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for North Carolina and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the WSO 
HAT service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from Morehead City 
and Wakefield, attachment E validate that the WSR-88Ds meet 
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Morehead City and 
Wakefield, attachment F, document that a total of five negative 
comments were received for both offices. All negative comments have 
been answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the 
reports.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing WSO HAT WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Cape 
Hatteras service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
    William Comeaux, AM/MIC NWSFO Cleveland, OH
    Theresa Rossi, AM/MIC NWSFO Pittsburgh, PA
    Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgement, consolidation of the Akron Weather 
Service Office (WSO CAK) with the future Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and 
Charleston Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Akron service area. This 
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Akron service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below, 
we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Cleveland, Pittsburgh 
and Charleston WFOs, will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Akron service area from the WSO CAK location and list of services to 
be provided from the future Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and Charleston 
WFO locations after the proposed consolidation is included as 
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services 
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO CAK Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Cleveland Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO CAK service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included 
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Akron 
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports for the Cleveland, 
Pittsburgh, and Charleston area radars, attachment E, validate that 
the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are 
fully operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and 
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Cleveland, 
Pittsburgh, and Charleston WFOs, attachment F, document that a total 
of 14 comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been 
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the 
reports.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Akron local warning radar, WSR-74C, is no longer 
needed to support services or products for local office operations.

[[Page 5751]]

    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Akron 
service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
    Kenneth J. Haydu, MIC NWSO Cincinnati, OH
    William Comeaux, AM/MIC NWSFO Cleveland, OH
    Theresa Rossi, AM/MIC NWSFO Pittsburgh, PA
    Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Columbus Weather 
Service Office (WSO CMH) with the future Cincinnati, Cleveland, 
Pittsburgh and Charleston Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not 
result in any degradation in weather services to the Columbus 
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the 
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Columbus service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Cincinnati, Cleveland, 
Pittsburgh and Charleston WFOs, will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Columbus service area from the WSO CMH location and list of services 
to be provided from the future Cincinnati Area, Cleveland Area, 
Pittsburgh Area and Charleston Area WFOs locations after the 
proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of 
these services shows that all services currently provided will 
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the 
enclosed map shows the WSO CMH Area of Responsibility (i.e. 
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Cincinnati Area of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO CMH service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planed NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included 
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Columbus 
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Cincinnati, 
Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Charleston areas attachment E, validate 
that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); 
are fully operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces 
and satisfactory support of associated NWS forcasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Cincinnati, 
Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Charleston WFOs area, attachment F, 
document that a total of 18 comments required follow-up. All 
negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the 
users as reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the exiting Columbus local warning radar, WSR-74C, is no longer 
needed to support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Columbus 
service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certifcation.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum for: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Bruce W. Budd, MIC NWSO Central Pennsylvania, PA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Harrisburg Weather 
Service Office (WSO HRCP1) with the future Central Pennsylvania 
Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in 
weather services to the Harrisburg service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Harrisburg service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Central Pennsylvania 
WFO will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Harrisburg service area from the WSO HRCP1 location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Central Pennsylvania WFO 
location after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment 
B. Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO HRCP1 Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Central Pennsylvania Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I 
find that there will be no degradation in the quality of these 
services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO HRCP1 service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Pennsylvania and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Harrisburg service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.

[[Page 5752]]

    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from the Central 
Pennsylvania area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet 
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Central 
Pennsylvania WFO area, attachment F, document that three comments 
required follow-up. All negative comments have been answered to the 
satisfaction of the users as reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Harrisburg local warning radar, WSR-76C, is no 
longer needed to support services or products for local office 
operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Harrisburg 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ______ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ______, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum for: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
    Bruce W. Budd, MIC NWSO Central Pennsylvania, PA
    Peter R. Ahnert, MIC NWSO Binghamton, NY
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Williamsport 
Weather Service Office (WSO IPT) with the future Central 
Pennsylvania and Binghampton Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not 
result in any degradation in weather services to the Williamsport 
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the 
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Williamsport service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Central Pennsylvania 
and Binghampton Area WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Williamsport service area from the WSO IPT location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Centrall Pennsylvania and 
Binghamton area WFOs locations after the proposed consolidation is 
included as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that 
all services currently provided will continue to be provided after 
the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO IPT 
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the 
future WFO Central Pennsylvania Area of Responsibility. As discussed 
below, I find that there will be no degradation in the quality of 
these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO IPT service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Pennsylvania and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Williamsport service area will be increased and no area will be 
missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from the Central 
Pennsylvania and Binghamton areas, attachment E, validate that the 
WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully 
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and 
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Central 
Pennsylvania and Binghampton WFOs areas, attachment F, document that 
five comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been 
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the 
report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
necessary since WSO IPT does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the 
Williamsport service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing

Attachments

[FR Doc. 96-3380 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M