[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5744-5752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-3380]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Weather Service Modernization and Associated
Restructuring
ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Weather Service (NWS) is publishing proposed
certifications for the proposed consolidations of:
(1) Residual Portland, ME Weather Service Office (RWSO) into the
future Portland, ME WFO;
(2) Concord Weather Service Office (WSO) into the future Portland,
ME and Boston Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
(3) Mansfield WSO into the future Cleveland WFO;
(4) Youngstown WSO into the future Cleveland and Pittsburgh WFOs;
(5) Dayton WSO into the future Cincinnati WFO;
(6) Toledo WSO into the future Cleveland and Cincinnati WFOs;
(7) Lynchburg WSO into the future Roanoke WFO;
(8) Roanoke WSO into the future Roanoke WFO;
(9) Cape Hatteras WSO into the future Morehead City and Wakefield
WFOs;
(10) Akron WSO into the future Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and
Charleston, WV WFOs;
(11) Columbus, OH WSO into the future Cincinnati, Cleveland,
Pittsburgh, and Charleston, WV WFOs;
[[Page 5745]]
(12) Harrisburg WSO into the future Central Pennsylvania WFO; and
(13) Williamsport WSO into the future Central Pennsylvania and
Binghamton WFOs.
In accordance with Public Law 102-567, the public will have 60-days
in which to comment on these proposed consolidation certifications.
DATES: Comments are requested by April 15, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the proposed consolidation packages
should be sent to Janet Gilmer, Room 12316, 1325 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephone 301-713-0276. All comments should be
sent to Janet Gilmer at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Scanlon at 301-713-1413.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: NWS anticipates consolidating:
(1) The Residual Portland, ME Weather Service Forecast Office
(WSFO) with the future Portland, ME WFO;
(2) The Concord Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future
Portland, ME and Boston Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
(3) The Mansfield WSO with the future Cleveland WFO;
(4) The Youngstown WSO with the future Cleveland and Pittsburgh
WFOs;
(5) The Dayton WSO with the future Cincinnati WFO;
(6) The Toledo WSO with the future Cleveland and Cincinnati WFOs;
(7) The Lynchburg WSO with the future Roanoke WFO;
(8) The Roanoke WSO with the future Roanoke WFO;
(9) The Cape Hatteras WSO with the future Morehead City and
Wakefield WFOs;
(10) The Akron WSO with the future Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and
Charleston, WV WFOs;
(11) The Columbus, OH WSO with the future Cincinnati, Cleveland,
Pittsburgh, and Charleston, WV WFOs;
(12) The Harrisburg WSO with the future Central Pennsylvania WFO;
and
(13) The Williamsport WSO with the future Central Pennsylvania and
Binghamton WFOs.
In accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567, the Secretary
of Commerce must certify that these consolidations will not result in
any degradation of service to the affected areas of responsibility and
must publish the proposed consolidation certifications in the FR. The
documentation supporting each proposed certification includes the
following:
(1) A draft memorandum by the meteorologist-in-charge recommending
the certification, the final of which will be endorsed by the Regional
Director and the Assistant Administrator of the NWS if appropriate,
after consideration of public comments and completion of consultation
with the Modernization Transition Committee (the Committee);
(2) A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns which affect the weather services provided within the
service area;
(3) A comparison of the services provided within the service area
and the services to be provided after such action;
(4) A description of any recent or expected modernization of NWS
operation which will enhance services in the service area;
(5) An identification of any area within the affected service area
which would not receive coverage (at an elevation of 10,000 feet) by
the next generation weather radar network;
(6) Evidence, based upon operational demonstration of modernized
NWS operations, which was considered reaching the conclusion that no
degradation in service will result from such action including the WSR-
88D Radar Commissioning Report(s), User Confirmation of Services
Report(s), and the Decommissioning Readiness Report (as applicable);
and
(7) A letter appointing the liaison officer.
These proposed certifications do not include any report of the
Committee which could be submitted in accordance with sections
706(b)(6) and 707(c) of Public Law 102-567. At their December 14, 1995
meeting the members ``* * * resolved that the MTC modify its procedure
to eliminate proposed certification consultations of noncontroversial
closings, consolidations, relocations, and automation certifications
but will provide final consultation on certifications after public
comment and before final submission to the Secretary of Commerce.''
Documentation supporting the proposed certifications is too
voluminous to publish in its entirety. Copies of the supporting
documentation can be obtained through the contact listed above.
Attached to this Notice are draft memoranda by the respective
meteorologists-in-charge recommending the certifications.
Once all public comments have been received and considered, the NWS
will complete consultation with the Committee and determine whether to
proceed with the final certifications. If decisions to certify are
made, the Secretary of Commerce must publish the final certifications
in the FR and transmit the certifications to the appropriate
Congressional committees prior to consolidating the offices.
Dated: February 7, 1996.
Elbert W. Friday, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services.
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Albert W. Wheeler, AM/MIC NWSFO Portland, ME
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
A change of operations occurred at the Portland Weather Service
Forecast Office (WSFO), located at the Portland Jet Port, in
September 1994 when most personnel were transferred to the facility
of the future Portland Area Weather Forecast Office (WFO) in Gray,
Maine to operate the WSR-88D and assume forecast and warning
responsibility for the Portland service area. At the same time the
Portland Jet Port (PWM) location was designated a Residual Weather
Service Office (RWSO) to continue operating the existing WSR-74S
radar and taking surface airways observations.
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the RWSO PWM with the
future Portland Area Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result
in any degradation in weather services to the Portland service area.
This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Portland service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Portland Area WFO will
not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Portland service area from the RWSO PWM location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Portland area WFO location
after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the RWSO PWM Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Portland Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that
there will be no degradation in the
[[Page 5746]]
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the RWSO PWM service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOC, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Maine and portions of surrounding areas is included
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Portland
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Portland
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Portland, attachment
F, document that four negative comments were received. Three of
these comments related to the Portland service area. All negative
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as
reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Portland WSR-74S radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Portland
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ______ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ______, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
Albert W. Wheeler, AM/MIC NWSFO Portland, ME
Robert M. Thompson, AM/MIC NWSFO Boston, MA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Concord Weather
Service Office (WSO CON) with the future Portland Weather Forecast
Office (WFO) and the future Boston WFO, will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Concord service area. This
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1.A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Concord service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Portland and Boston
WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Concord service area from the WSO CON location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Portland and Boston WFO
locations after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment
B. Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO CON Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Portland Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO CON service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for New Hampshire and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Concord service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Portland and
Boston areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Portland and Boston,
attachment F, document that four negative comments were received
from the Portland area and two negative responses were received for
the Boston area. None of the negative comments pertained to the
Concord area. All negative comments have been answered to the
satisfaction of the users as reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
required as WSO CON did not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Concord
service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certificate.
John T. Forsing
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: William Comeaux, AM/MIC NWSFO Cleveland, OH
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Mansfield Weather
Service Office (WSO MFD) with the future Cleveland Weather Forecast
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services
to the Mansfield service area. This proposed certification is in
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Mansfield service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that
[[Page 5747]]
providing the services which address these characteristics and concerns
from the future Cleveland WFO will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Mansfield service area from the WSO MFD location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Cleveland WFO location after
the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison
of these services shows that all services currently provided will
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the
enclosed map shows the WSO MFD Area of Responsibility (i.e.
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Cleveland Area of
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO MFD service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOC, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Mansfield
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Cleveland
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Cleveland, attachment
F, document that seven responses required full-up. All negative
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as
reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
needed as WSO MFD does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Mansfield
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ______ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ______, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
William Comeaux, AM/MIC NWSFO Cleveland, OH
Theresa Rossi, AM/MIC NWSFO Pittsburgh, PA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Youngstown
Weather Service Office (WSO YNG) with the future Cleveland and
Pittsburgh Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Youngstown service area. This
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary.
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Youngstown service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Cleveland and
Pittsburgh WFOs, will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of services currently provided within the
Youngstown service area from the WSO YNG location and list of
services to be provided from the future Cleveland and Pittsburgh
WFOs locations after the proposed consolidation is included as
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO YNG Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Cleveland Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO YNG service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Youngstown
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from the Cleveland and
Pittsburgh areas, attachment E. validate that the WSR-88Ds meet
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Cleveland
and Pittsburgh WFO areas, attachment F, document that a total of 10
comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the
report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
necessary since WSO YNG does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Youngstown
service area in included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________, public
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On
________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation
(attachment K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed
to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend
this certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Kenneth J. Haydu, MIC NWSO Cincinnati, OH
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Dayton Weather
Service Office (WSO DAY) with the future Cincinnati Weather Forecast
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services
to the Dayton service area. This proposed certification is in
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
[[Page 5748]]
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Dayton service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below,
I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Cincinnati WFO, will
not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Dayton service area from the WSO DAY location and list of services
to be provided from the future Cincinnati WFO locations after the
proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of
these services shows that all services currently provided will
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the
enclosed map shows the WSO DAY Area of Responsibility (i.e.
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Cincinnati Area of
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO DAY service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Dayton
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from the Cincinnati
areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Cincinnati
WFO areas, attachment F, document that four comments required
follow-up. All negative comments have been answered to the
satisfaction of the users as reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
needed as WSO DAY does not have radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Dayton
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
William Comeaux, AM/MIC NWSFO Cleveland, OH
Kenneth J. Haydu, MIC NWSO Cincinnati, OH
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgement, consolidation of the Toledo Weather
Service Office (WSO TOL) with the future Cincinnati and Cleveland
Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any degradation
in weather services to the Toledo service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, we are
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Toledo service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below,
we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Cincinnati and
Cleveland WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Toledo service area from the WSO TOL location and list of services
to be provided from the future Cincinnati and Cleveland WFO
locations after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment
B. Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO TOL Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Cleveland Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO TOL service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Toledo
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from Cincinnati and
Cleveland areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Cincinnati
and Cleveland WFO areas, attachment F, document that a total of 11
comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the
report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
necessary since WSO TOL does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Toledo
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: John V. Wright, MIC NWSO Roanoke, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Lynchburg Weather
Service Office (WSO LYH) with the future Roanoke Weather Forecast
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services
to the Lynchburg service area. This proposed
[[Page 5749]]
certification is in accordance with the advance notification provided
in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending
you approve this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law
102-567. If you concur, please endorse this recommendation and
forward this package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather
Services for final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will
forward the certification to the Secretary for approval and
transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Lynchburg service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Roanoke WFO will not
degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Lynchburg service area from the WSO LYH location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Roanoke WFO location after
the proposed consolidation is included in attachment B. Comparison
of these services shows that all services currently provided will
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the
enclosed map shows the WSO Lynchburg Area of Responsibility (i.e.
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Roanoke Area of
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO LYH service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Lynchburg service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Roanoke
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Roanoke WFO
area, attachment F, document that seven comments required follow-up.
All negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the
users as reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
needed as WSO LYH does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Lynchburg
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ______ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ______, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: John V. Wright, MIC NWSO Roanoke, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Roanoke Weather
Service Office (WSO ROA) with the future Roanoke Weather Forecast
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services
to the Roanoke service area. This proposed certification is in
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Roanoke service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Roanoke WFO will not
degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Roanoke service area from the WSO ROA location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Roanoke WFO location after
the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison
of these services shows that all services currently provided will
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the
enclosed map shows the WSO ROA Area of Responsibility (i.e.
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Roanoke Area of
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO ROA service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Roanoke service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Roanoke
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Roanoke WFO
area, attachment F, document that seven responses required follow-
up. All negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of
the users as reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
needed as WSO ROA does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Roanoke
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
Thomas E. Kriehn, MIC NWSO Morehead City, NC
[[Page 5750]]
Anthony L. Siebers, MIC MWSO Wakefield, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgement, consolidation of the Weather Service
Office Cape Hatteras, NC (WSO HAT) with the future Weather Forecast
Offices (WFOs) Morehead City, NC and Wakefield, VA, will not result
in any degradation in weather services to the Cape Hatteras service
area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the Cape
Hatteras service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Morehead City and
Wakefield WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Cape Hatteras service area from the WSO HAT location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Morehead City and Wakefield
WFO locations after the proposed consolidation is included as
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO HAT Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future
Morehead City WFO Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we
find that there will be no degradation in the quality of these
services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO HAT service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for North Carolina and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the WSO
HAT service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from Morehead City
and Wakefield, attachment E validate that the WSR-88Ds meet
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Morehead City and
Wakefield, attachment F, document that a total of five negative
comments were received for both offices. All negative comments have
been answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the
reports.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing WSO HAT WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Cape
Hatteras service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
William Comeaux, AM/MIC NWSFO Cleveland, OH
Theresa Rossi, AM/MIC NWSFO Pittsburgh, PA
Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgement, consolidation of the Akron Weather
Service Office (WSO CAK) with the future Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and
Charleston Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Akron service area. This
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Akron service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below,
we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Cleveland, Pittsburgh
and Charleston WFOs, will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Akron service area from the WSO CAK location and list of services to
be provided from the future Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and Charleston
WFO locations after the proposed consolidation is included as
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO CAK Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Cleveland Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO CAK service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Akron
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports for the Cleveland,
Pittsburgh, and Charleston area radars, attachment E, validate that
the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are
fully operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Cleveland,
Pittsburgh, and Charleston WFOs, attachment F, document that a total
of 14 comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the
reports.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Akron local warning radar, WSR-74C, is no longer
needed to support services or products for local office operations.
[[Page 5751]]
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Akron
service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
Kenneth J. Haydu, MIC NWSO Cincinnati, OH
William Comeaux, AM/MIC NWSFO Cleveland, OH
Theresa Rossi, AM/MIC NWSFO Pittsburgh, PA
Alan Rezek, AM/MIC NWSFO Charleston, WV
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Columbus Weather
Service Office (WSO CMH) with the future Cincinnati, Cleveland,
Pittsburgh and Charleston Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not
result in any degradation in weather services to the Columbus
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Columbus service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Cincinnati, Cleveland,
Pittsburgh and Charleston WFOs, will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Columbus service area from the WSO CMH location and list of services
to be provided from the future Cincinnati Area, Cleveland Area,
Pittsburgh Area and Charleston Area WFOs locations after the
proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of
these services shows that all services currently provided will
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the
enclosed map shows the WSO CMH Area of Responsibility (i.e.
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Cincinnati Area of
Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO CMH service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planed NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Ohio and portions of surrounding areas is included
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Columbus
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Cincinnati,
Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Charleston areas attachment E, validate
that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test);
are fully operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces
and satisfactory support of associated NWS forcasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Cincinnati,
Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Charleston WFOs area, attachment F,
document that a total of 18 comments required follow-up. All
negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the
users as reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the exiting Columbus local warning radar, WSR-74C, is no longer
needed to support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Columbus
service area is included at attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certifcation.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum for: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Bruce W. Budd, MIC NWSO Central Pennsylvania, PA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Harrisburg Weather
Service Office (WSO HRCP1) with the future Central Pennsylvania
Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in
weather services to the Harrisburg service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Harrisburg service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Central Pennsylvania
WFO will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Harrisburg service area from the WSO HRCP1 location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Central Pennsylvania WFO
location after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment
B. Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO HRCP1 Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Central Pennsylvania Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I
find that there will be no degradation in the quality of these
services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO HRCP1 service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Pennsylvania and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Harrisburg service area will be increased and no area will be missed
in coverage.
[[Page 5752]]
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from the Central
Pennsylvania area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two
national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Central
Pennsylvania WFO area, attachment F, document that three comments
required follow-up. All negative comments have been answered to the
satisfaction of the users as reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Harrisburg local warning radar, WSR-76C, is no
longer needed to support services or products for local office
operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Harrisburg
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ______ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ______, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,
Attachments
Memorandum for: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
Bruce W. Budd, MIC NWSO Central Pennsylvania, PA
Peter R. Ahnert, MIC NWSO Binghamton, NY
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Williamsport
Weather Service Office (WSO IPT) with the future Central
Pennsylvania and Binghampton Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not
result in any degradation in weather services to the Williamsport
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Williamsport service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Central Pennsylvania
and Binghampton Area WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Williamsport service area from the WSO IPT location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Centrall Pennsylvania and
Binghamton area WFOs locations after the proposed consolidation is
included as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that
all services currently provided will continue to be provided after
the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO IPT
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the
future WFO Central Pennsylvania Area of Responsibility. As discussed
below, I find that there will be no degradation in the quality of
these services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO IPT service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Pennsylvania and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Williamsport service area will be increased and no area will be
missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from the Central
Pennsylvania and Binghamton areas, attachment E, validate that the
WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Central
Pennsylvania and Binghampton WFOs areas, attachment F, document that
five comments required follow-up. All negative comments have been
answered to the satisfaction of the users as reflected in the
report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
necessary since WSO IPT does not have a radar.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the
Williamsport service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing
Attachments
[FR Doc. 96-3380 Filed 2-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M