[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5739-5744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-3379]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


National Weather Service Modernization and Associated 
Restructuring

ACTION: Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Weather Service (NWS) is publishing proposed 
certifications for the proposed consolidations of:
    (1) Residual Moline Weather Service Office (RWSO) into the future 
Quad Cities WFO;
    (2) Residual Raleigh WSO into the future Raleigh/Durham WFO;
    (3) Hartford Weather Service Office (WSO) into the future Boston, 
New York City and Albany Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
    (4) Baltimore WSO into the future Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC; 
Philadelphia; and Wakefield WFOs;
    (5) Norfolk WSO into the future Wakefield WFO;
    (6) Richmond WSO into the future Wakefield, Roanoke, and Baltimore, 
MD/Washington, DC WFOs;
    (7) Atlantic City WSO into the future Philadelphia WFO; and
    (8) Wilmington (WSO) into the future Philadelphia WFO. In 
accordance with Public Law 102-567, the public will have 60-days in 
which to comment on these proposed consolidation certifications.

DATE: April 15, 1996.

ADDRESS: Requests for copies of the proposed consolidation packages 
should be sent to Janet Gilmer, Room 12316, 1325 East-West Highway, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephone 301-713-0276. All comments should be 
sent to Janet Gilmer at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Julie Scanlon at 301-713-1413.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NWS anticipates consolidating:
    (1) The Residual Moline Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the 
future Quad Cities WFO;
    (2) The Residual Raleigh WSO with the future Raleigh/Durham WFO;
    (3) The Hartford Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future 
Boston, New York City and Albany Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs);
    (4) The Baltimore WSO with the future Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC; 
Philadelphia; and Wakefield WFOs;
    (5) The Norfolk WSO with the future Wakefield WFO;
    (6) The Richmond WSO with the future Wakefield, Roanoke, and 
Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC WFOs;
    (7) The Atlantic City WSO with the future Philadelphia WFO; and
    (8) The Wilmington WSO with the future Philadelphia WFO.
    In accordance with section 706 of Pub. L. 102-567, the Secretary of 
Commerce must certify that these consolidations will not result in any 
degradation of service to the affected areas of responsibility and must 
publish the proposed consolidation certifications in the FR. The 
documentation support each proposed certification includes the 
following:
    (1) A draft memorandum by the meteorologist-in-charge recommending 
the certification, the final of which will be endorsed by the Regional 
Director and the Assistant Administrator of the NWS if appropriate, 
after consolidation of public comments and completion of 

[[Page 5740]]
consultation with the Modernization Transition Committee (the 
Committee);
    (2) A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns which affect the weather services provided within the 
service area;
    (3) A comparison of the services provided within the service area 
and the services to be provided after such action;
    (4) A description of any recent or expected modernization of NWS 
operation which will enhance services in the service area;
    (5) An identification of any area within the affected service area 
which would not receive coverage (at an elevation of 10,000 feet) by 
the next generation weather radar network;
    (6) Evidence, based upon operational demonstration of modernized 
NWS operations, which was considered in reaching the conclusion that no 
degration in service will result from such action including the WSR-88D 
Radar Commissioning Report(s), User Confirmation of Services Report(s), 
and the Decommissioning Readiness Report (as applicable); and
    (7) A letter appointing the liaison officer.
    These proposed certifications do not include any report of the 
Committee which could be submitted in accordance with sections 
706(b)(6) and 707(c) of Public Law 102-567. At their December 14, 1995 
meeting the members ``* * * resolved that the MTC modify its procedure 
to eliminate proposed certification consultations of noncontroversial 
closings, consolidations, relocations, and automation certifications 
but will provide final consultation on certifications after public 
comment and before final submission to the Secretary of Commerce.''
    Documentation supporting the proposed certifications is too 
voluminous to publish in its entirety. Copies of the supporting 
documentation can be obtained through the contact listed above.
    Attached to this Notice are draft memoranda by the respective 
meteorologists-in-charge recommending the certifications.
    Once all public comments have been received and considered, the NWS 
will complete consultation with the Committee and determine whether to 
proceed with the final certifications. If decisions to certify are 
made, the Secretary of Commerce must publish the final certifications 
in the FR and transmit the certifications to the appropriate 
Congressional committees prior to consolidating the offices.

    Dated: February 9, 1996.
Louis J. Boezi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Modernization.

Memorandum For: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: Charles T. Fenley, MIC, NWSO Quad Cities, Davenport, IA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    In February 1995, a change of operations occurred when most 
personnel and most services provided by WSO Moline (located at the 
Quad City Airport), were transferred to the future WFO site in 
Davenport, Iowa. At that time, a Residual Weather Service Office 
(RWSO) was left in Moline to continue the surface and radar 
observational programs. Since that time, the Quad City Airport 
(Moline) ASOS has been commissioned (July 1, 1995), the WSR-88D 
radar has been commissioned (September 7, 1995), and the WSR-74C 
radar has been decommissioned (January 19, 1996). Radar 
observational services, and the responsibility thereof, that had 
been provided from the Moline Office have been transferred to the 
future Quad Cities WFO in Davenport, Iowa.
    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Moline, Illinois 
Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the future Quad Cities 
(Davenport, Iowa) Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in 
any degradation in weather services to the Moline, Illinois service 
area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward certification 
to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided to the pre-
modernized Moline, Illinois service area is included as Attachment 
A. As discussed below, I find that providing the services which 
address these characteristics and concerns from the future Quad 
Cities (Davenport, Iowa) WFO will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided, within 
the Moline, Illinois service area from the Moline, Illinois RWSO 
location and a list of services to be provided from the future Quad 
Cities (Davenport, Iowa) WFO location after the proposed 
consolidation is included as Attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map 
shows the RWSO Moline, Illinois Area of Responsibility (i.e. 
``Affected Service Area'') and the future Quad Cities (Davenport, 
Iowa) WFO Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of those services as a 
result of consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the RWSO Moline, Illinois service area is included as 
Attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed, and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for southeast, east central Iowa, and northwest Illinois 
is included as Attachment D. NWS operation radar coverage for the 
RWSO Moline, Illinois service area will be increased.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Quad Cities 
(Davenport, Iowa), Attachment E, validate that the WSR-88D meets 
technical specifications (acceptance test); is fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. A full compliment of spares is on-
station, but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the Quad Cities 
(Davenport, Iowa), Attachment F, document that no negative comments 
were received.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, validates 
that the old WSR-74C radar at Moline, Illinois is no longer needed 
to support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Moline, 
Illinois service area is included as Attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (Attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (Attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
Richard P. Augulis,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Stephen Harned, AM/MIC NWSFO Raleigh/Durham, NC
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification


[[Page 5741]]

    A change of operations occurred at the Raleigh Weather Service 
Forecast Office (WSFO), located at the Raleigh Airport, in January 
1994 when most personnel were transferred to the facility of the 
future Raleigh/Durham Weather Forecast Office (WFO) on the campus of 
North Carolina State University in Raleigh to operate the WSR-88D 
and assume forecast and warning responsibility for the Raleigh 
service area. At the same time the Raleigh Airport (RDU) location 
was designated a Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) to continue 
operating the existing WSR-74C radar and taking surface airways 
observations.
    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the RWSO RDU with the 
future Raleigh/Durham Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result 
in any degradation in weather services to the Raleigh service area. 
This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance 
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please 
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Raleigh service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Raleigh/Durham WFO will 
not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Raleigh service area from the RSWO RDU location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Raleigh area WFO location 
after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the RWSO RDU Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Raleigh Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the RWSO RDU service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOC, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
1,000 feet for North Carolina and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Raleigh service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Raleigh 
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interface and satisfactory support 
of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service backup 
capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of operations and 
maintenance documentation is available; and spare parts and test 
equipment and trained operations and maintenance personnel are 
available on site. Training was completed but two national work-
arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Raleigh attachment F, 
document that three negative comments were received. All negative 
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as 
reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Raleigh WSR-74C radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Raleigh 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
    Robert M. Thompson, AM/MIC NWSFO Boston, MA
    Michael E. Wyllies, AM/MIC NWSFO New York City, NY
    Warren Snyder, Acting MIC NWSFO Albany, NY
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgement, consolidation of the Hartford Weather 
Service Office (WSO BDL) with the future Boston, New York City and 
Albany Weather Forecast Office (WFOs) will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Hartford service area. This 
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Hartford service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Boston, New York City 
and Albany WFOs, will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Hartford service area from the WSO BDL location and list of services 
to be provided from the future Boston Area, New York City Area and 
Albany Area WFOs locations after the proposed consolidation is 
included as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that 
all services currently provided will continue to be provided after 
the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO BDL 
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the 
future WFO Boston Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find 
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services 
as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO BBL service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Connecticut and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Hartford service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from the Boston, New 
York City and Albany areas, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds 
meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully 
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and 
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Boston, New 
York City and Albany WFOs areas, attachment F, document that a total 
of seven comments required follow-up. 

[[Page 5742]]
All negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the 
users as reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Hartford local warning radar, WSR-74C, is no 
longer needed to support services or products for local office 
operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Hartford 
service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
    James Travers, AM/MIC NWSFO Baltimore/Washington
    G.C. Henricksen, AM/MIC NWSFO Philadelphia, PA
    Anthony Siebers, MIC NWSO Wakefield, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Baltimore Weather 
Service Office (WSO BWI) with the future Wakefield, Baltimore/
Washington and Philadelphia Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not 
result in any degradation in weather services to the Baltimore 
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the 
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Baltimore service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Wakefield, Baltimore/
Washington and Philadelphia WFOs, will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Baltimore service area from the WSO BWI location and list of 
services to be provided from the future Wakefield, Baltimore/
Washington and Philadelphia WFO locations after the proposed 
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map 
shows the WSO BWI Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service 
Area'') and the future WFO Baltimore/Washington Area of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO BWI service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Maryland and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Baltimore service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Wakefield, 
Baltimore/Washington and Philadelphia areas, attachment E, validate 
that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); 
are fully operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces 
and satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Wakefield, 
Baltimore/Washington and Philadelphia WFO areas, attachment F, 
document that a total of six comments required follow-up. All 
negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the 
users as reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
necessary since WSO BWI does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Baltimore 
service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Anthony L. Siebers, MIC NWSO Wakefield, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Norfolk Weather 
Service Office (WSO ORF) with the future Wakefield Weather Forecast 
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services 
to the Norfolk service area. This proposed certification is in 
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this 
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you 
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package 
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Norfolk service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Wakefield WFO will not 
degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Norfolk service area from the WSO ORF location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Wakefield WFO location after 
the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison 
of these services shows that all services currently provided will 
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the 
enclosed map shows the WSO ORF Area of Responsibility (i.e. 
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Wakefield Area of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO ORF service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Norfolk service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.

[[Page 5743]]

    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Wakefield 
area, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Wakefield, attachment 
F, document that three responses required follow-up. All negative 
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as 
reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
needed as WSO ORF does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Norfolk 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From:
    Anthony Siebers, MIC NWSO Wakefield, VA
    James Travers, AM/MIC NWSFO Baltimore/Washington
    John V. Wright, MIC NWSO Roanoke, VA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Richmond Weather 
Service Office (WSO RIC) with the future Wakefield, Baltimore/
Washington and Roanoke Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not 
result in any degradation in weather services to the Richmond 
service area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the 
advance notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Richmond service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Wakefield, Baltimore/
Washington and Roanoke WFOs, will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Richmond service area from the WSO RIC location and list of services 
to be provided from the future Wakefield, Baltimore/Washington and 
Roanoke WFOs locations after the proposed consolidation is included 
as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all 
services currently provided will continue to be provided after the 
proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO RIC 
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the 
future WFO Wakefield Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, we 
find that there will be no degradation in the quality of these 
services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO RIC service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Virginia and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Richmond service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from the Wakefield, 
Baltimore/Washington and Roanoke areas, attachment E, validate that 
the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are 
fully operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and 
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from the future Wakefield, 
Baltimore/Washington and Roanoke WFO areas, attachment F, document 
that a total of 13 comments required follow-up. All negative 
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the users as 
reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
necessary since WSO RIC does not have a radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Richmond 
service area is included at attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Chet Henricksen, AM/MIC NWSFO Philadelphia, PA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Weather Service 
Office (WSO) Atlantic City, NJ with the Philadelphia Weather 
Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather 
services to the Atlantic City service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Atlantic City service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Philadelphia WFO will 
not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Atlantic City service area from WSO Atlantic City location and a 
list of services to be provided from the future Philadelphia WFO 
location after the proposed consolidation is included as attachment 
B. Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Atlantic City 
Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the 
future WFO Philadelphia Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, 
I find that there will be no degradation in the 

[[Page 5744]]
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Atlantic City service area is included as 
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for New Jersey and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Atlantic City service area will be increased and no area will be 
missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from Philadelphia, 
attachment E validate that the WSR-88D meet technical specifications 
(acceptance test); are fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Philadelphia, 
attachment F, document that no negative comments were received for 
the Philadelphia NWSFO area related.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Atlantic City WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Atlantic 
City service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Chet Henricksen, AM/MIC NWSFO Philadelphia, PA
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached document, I have determined, in my 
professional judgement, consolidation of the Weather Service Office 
(WSO) Wilmington, DE with the future Philadelphia Weather Forecast 
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services 
to the Wilmington service area. This proposed certification is in 
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this 
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you 
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package 
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Wilmington service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Philadelphia WFO will 
not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Wilmington service area from WSO Wilmington location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Philadelphia WFO location 
after the proposed consolidation is included in attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Wilmington Area 
of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future 
WFO Philadelphia Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find 
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services 
as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Wilmington service area is included as 
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Delaware and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Delaware service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from Philadelphia, 
attachment E validate that the WSR-88D meet technical specifications 
(acceptance test); are fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Philadelphia, 
attachment F, document that no negative comments were received for 
the Philadelphia NWSFO area related.
    C. WSO Wilmington does not have a radar, therefore, the 
Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not necessary for 
this report.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Wilmington 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ________, the 
Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment 
K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
John T. Forsing,

Attachments

[FR Doc. 96-3379 Filed 2-13-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M