[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3904-3909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-2189]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service Modernization and Associated
Restructuring
ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Weather Service (NWS) is publishing proposed
certifications for the proposed consolidations of:
(1) Colorado Springs Weather Service Office (WSO) into the future
Pueblo, Denver/Boulder and Goodland Weather Forecast Offices (WFO);
(2) Rockford WSO into the future Chicago and Quad Cities WFOs;
(3) Grand Island WSO into the future Hastings WFO;
(4) Apalachicola WSO into the future Tallahassee WFO;
(5) Pensacola WSO into the future Mobile and Tallahassee WFOs;
(6) Tupelo WSO into the future Memphis and Jackson WFOs;
(7) Del Rio WSO into the future Austin/San Antonio WFO; and
(8) Bristol WSO into the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Roanoke, and
Charleston, WV WFOs.
In accordance with Pub. Law 102-567, the public will have 60 days
in which to comment on these proposed consolidation certifications.
DATES: Comments are requested by April 2, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the proposed consolidation packages
should be sent to Janet Gilmer, Room 12316, 1325 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephone 301-713-0276. All comments should be
sent to Janet Gilmer at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Julie Scanlon at 301-713-1413.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NWS anticipates consolidating:
(1) The Colorado Springs Weather Service Office (WSO) with the
future Pueblo, Denver/Boulder and Goodland Weather Forecast Offices
(WFOs);
(2) The Rockford WSO with the future Chicago and Quad Cities WFOs;
(3) The Grand Island WSO with the future Hastings WFO;
(4) The Apalachicola WSO with the future Tallahassee WFO;
(5) The Pensacola WSO with the future Mobile and Tallahassee WFOs;
(6) The Tupelo WSO with the future Memphis and Jackson WFOs;
(7) The Del Rio WSO with the future Austin/San Antonio WFO; and
(8) The Bristol WSO with the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Roanoke
and Charleston, WV WFOs.
In accordance with section 706 of Pub. Law 102-567, the Secretary
of Commerce must certify that these consolidations will not result in
any degradation of service to the affected areas of responsibility and
must publish the proposed consolidation certifications in the FR. The
documentation supporting each proposed certification includes the
following:
(1) A draft memorandum by the meteorologist-in-charge recommending
the certification, the final of which will be endorsed by the Regional
Director
[[Page 3905]]
and the Assistant Administrator of the NWS if appropriate, after
consideration of public comments and completion of consultation with
the Modernization Transition Committee (the Committee);
(2) A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns which affect the weather services provided within the
service area;
(3) A comparison of the services provided within the service area
and the services to be provided after such action;
(4) A description of any recent or expected modernization of NWS
operation which will enhance services in the service area;
(5) An identification of any area within the affected service area
which would not receive coverage (at an elevation of 10,000 feet) by
the next generation weather radar network;
(6) Evidence, based upon operational demonstration of modernized
NWS operations, which was considered in reaching the conclusion that no
degradation in service will result from such action including the WSR-
88D Radar Commissioning Report(s), User Confirmation of Services
Report(s), and the Decommissioning Readiness Report (as applicable);
and
(7) A letter appointing the liaison officer.
These proposed certifications do not include any report of the
Committee which could be submitted in accordance with sections
706(b)(6) and 707(c) of Pub. Law 102-567. At their December 14, 1995
meeting the members ``. . . resolved that the MTC modify its procedure
to eliminate proposed certification consultations of noncontroversial
closings, consolidations, relocations, and automation certifications
but will provide final consultation on certifications after public
comment and before final submission to the Secretary of Commerce.''
Documentation supporting the proposed certifications is too
voluminous to publish in its entirety. Copies of the supporting
documentation can be obtained through the contact listed above.
Attached to this Notice are draft memoranda by the respective
meteorologists-in-charge recommending the certifications.
Once all public comments have been received and considered, the NWS
will complete consultation with the Committee and determine whether to
proceed with the final certifications. If decisions to certify are
made, the Secretary of Commerce must publish the final certifications
in the FR and transmit the certifications to the appropriate
Congressional committees prior to consolidating the offices.
Dated: January 29, 1996.
Elbert W. Friday, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services.
Memorandum For: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: Steven D. Schurr, MIC, NWSO Hastings, NE
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Grand Island
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Hastings Weather
Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather
services to the Grand Island service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Grand Island service area is included as attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Hastings WFO will not
degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services provided within the Grand
Island service area from the Grand Island WSO location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Hastings WFO location after
the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison
of these services shows that all services currently provided will
continue to be provided after the proposal consolidation. Also, the
enclosed map shows the WSO Grand Island Area of Responsibility (i.e.
``Affected Service Area'') and the future Hastings WFO's Area of
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (MWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Grand Island service area is included as
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Nebraska and portions of surrounding areas is
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the
Grand Island service area will be increased and no area will be
missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from Hastings,
attachment E, validates that the WSR-88D meets technical
specifications (acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory
operation of system interfaces and satisfactory support of
associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service backup
capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of operations and
maintenance documentation is available; and spare parts and test
equipment and trained operations and maintenance personnel are
available on site. Training was completed but two national work-
arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Hastings, attachment
F, documents that one negative comment was received. That negative
comment has been answered to the satisfaction of the commentor as
reflected in the report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Grand WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to support
services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Grand
Island service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ____________,
the Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation
(attachment K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed
to the satisfaction of our customers and continue to recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Weather Service Forecast Office, 2090 Airport Road, New Braunfels,
TX 78130
January 31, 1996.
Memorandum For: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region
From: Antonio A. Dreumont, South Texas Area Manager
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgement, that consolidation of the Del Rio
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Austin/San Antonio
Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in
weather services to the Del Rio area. This proposed certification is
in accordance with the advance notification
[[Page 3906]]
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706
of Public law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the Del
Rio service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed below, I
find that providing the services which address these characteristics
and concerns from the future Austin/San Antonio office will not
degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Del Rio service area from the WSO Del Rio location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Austin/San Antonio WFO
location after consolidation is included in Attachment B. Comparison
of these services shows that all services currently provided will
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the
enclosed map shows the WSO Del Rio Area of Responsibility (i.e.,
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Austin/San Antonio
Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will
be no degradation in the quality of these services as a result of
the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Del Rio service area is included as Attachment
C. The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will
be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Texas is included as Attachment D. NWS operational
radar coverage for the specific service area will be increased and
no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSO Austin/San
Antonio, Attachment E-1, and Laughlin AFB, Attachment E-2, validate
that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test);
are fully operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces
and satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available;
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, Attachment F, documents
that only one negative comment was received. The negative comment
has been answered to the satisfaction of the commentor as stated in
the service Confirmation Report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not
applicable. There is no radar at WSO Del Rio to decommission.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Del Rio
service area is included as Attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (Attachment I) and the ________
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J).
On ____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (Attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
January 24, 1996.
Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, NWS
From:
Jerry O. McDuffie, MIC, NWSO Knoxville/Tri-Cities, TN
Kenneth A. Kostura, MIC, NWSO Roanoke, VA
Alan A. Rezek, MIC, NWSFO Charleston, WV
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, We have determined,
in our professional judgment, that consolidation of the Bristol
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities,
TN, Roanoke, VA, and Charleston, WV Weather Forecast Office (WFO)
will not result in any degradation in weather services to the
Bristol service area. This proposed certification is in accordance
with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, We recommended that you approve
this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If
you concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this
package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for
final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Bristol service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed
below, We find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from future WFOs Knoxville/Tri-Cities,
TN, Roanoke, VA, and Charleston, WV will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Bristol service area from WSO Bristol and a list of services to be
provided from the future WFO Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Roanoke, and
Charleston, WV locations after consolidation is included as
Attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Bristol Area of
Responsibility (i.e., ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, We
submit that there will be no degradation in the quality of these
services as a result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Bristol service area is included as Attachment
C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned WSR-88D radar coverage at an elevation
of 10,000 feet for east Tennessee and southwest Virginia is included
as Attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the specific
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in
coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSO Knoxville/
Tri-Cities, NWSO Roanoke, and NWSFO Charleston, WV, Attachment E,
validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance
test); are fully operational (satisfactory operation of system
interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting
and warning services); service backup capabilities are functioning
properly; a full set of operations and maintenance documentation is
available; and spare parts and test equipment, along with trained
operations and maintenance personnel, are available on site.
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, Attachment F, document
that no negative comments were received.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies
that the existing Bristol WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the WSO
Bristol service area is included as Attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (Attachment I) and the ________
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J).
On ____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (Attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to satisfaction of our customers and I continue to
recommend this certification.
[[Page 3907]]
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region
From:
Richard I. Coleman, MIC, NWSFO Memphis, TN
Tice H. Wagner, MIC, NWSFO Jackson, MS
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Tupelo, MS Weather
Service Office (WSO) with the future Memphis and Jackson Weather
Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather
services to the Tupelo service area. This proposed certification is
in accordance with the advance notification provided in the National
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to
Congress.
My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Tupelo service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below,
I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Memphis and Jackson
WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Tupelo service area from the Tupelo WSO location and a list of
services to be provided from the future Memphis and Jackson WFO
locations after consolidation is included as attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Tupelo Area of
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO
Memphis Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Tupelo service area is included as attachment C.
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Mississippi and Tennessee is included as attachment
D. NWS operational radar coverage for the specific service area will
be increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for Memphis and
Jackson, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88D meets technical
specifications (acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory
operation of system interfaces and satisfactory support of
associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service backup
capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of operations and
maintenance documentation is available; and spare parts and test
equipment and trained operations and maintenance personnel are
available on site. Training was completed but two national work-
arounds remain in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services for Memphis and Jackson,
attachment F, document that the only negative comment received was
from the manager of the AFSS. Upon further investigation, we found
that the complaint was aimed at FAA practices rather than with WSR-
88D products and services.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing WSR-74C radar is no longer needed to support
services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Tupelo
service area is included as attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ________
public comment received during the comment period (attachment J). On
____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (attachment K). I believe the one negative comment has
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorses this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
8400 Airport Blvd., Bldg. 11, Mobile, AL 36608
November 13, 1995.
Memorandum To: Harry S. Hassel, Director, NWS Southern Region
From:
Randall S. McKee, MIC, NWSO Mobile, AL
William P. Duval, MIC, NWSO Tallahassee
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined,
in my professional judgment, Consolidation of the Pensacola Weather
Service Office (WSO) with the future Mobile and Tallahassee Weather
Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any degradation of weather
services to the Pensacola service area. This proposed certification
is in accordance with the advance notification provided in the
National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you
approve this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law
102-567. If you concur, please endorse this recommendation and
forward this package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather
Services for final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will
forward the certification to the Secretary for approval and
transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based on my view of the pertinent evidence
and application of the modernization criteria for consolidation of a
field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Pensacola service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed
below, I find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the Mobile and Tallahassee WFOs
will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Pensacola service area from the Pensacola WSO location and a list of
services to be provided from the Mobile and Tallahassee WFO
locations after consolidation is included as Attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Pensacola Area
of Responsibility (i.e., ``Affected Service Area'') and the future
WFO Mobile Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a
result of the consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Pensacola service area is included as Attachment
C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Florida is included as Attachment D. NWS operational
radar coverage for the specific service area will be increased and
no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of services.
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for Mobile and
Tallahassee, Attachment E, validate that the WSR-88D meets technical
specifications (acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory
operation of system interfaces and satisfactory support of
associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service backup
capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of operations and
maintenance
[[Page 3908]]
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed, but two national work-arounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services for Mobile and Tallahassee,
Attachment F, document that two negative comments were received and
have been satisfactorily addressed as stated in the Service
Confirmation Report. Neither degrades services to the Pensacola WSO
area of responsibility.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies
that the existing Pensacola WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Pensacola
service area is included as Attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (Attachment I) and the ________
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J).
____________ We believe all concerns have been addressed to the
satisfaction of our customers and we therefore recommend this
certification.
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Regional Airport, 3238 Capital Circle, SW, Tallahassee, FL 32310-
8723
November 3, 1995.
Memorandum For: Harry S. Hassel, Director, NWS Southern Region
From: Paul Duval, MIC NWSO Tallahassee, Florida
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined
that in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Apalachicola
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Tallahassee Weather
Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather
services to the Apalachicola service area. This proposed
certification is in accordance with the advance notification
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am
recommending you approve this action in accordance with Section 706
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr.
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
My recommendation is based upon my review of the pertinent
evidence, and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of the local weather characteristics and
weather-related concerns affecting the weather services provided in
the Apalachicola service area is included as Attachment A. As
discussed below, I find that providing services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the Tallahassee WFO will not
degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Apalachicola service area from the Apalachicola WSO location, and a
list of services to be provided from the Tallahassee WFO location
after consolidation is included as Attachment B. Comparison of these
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map
shows the WSO Apalachicola Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected
Service Area'') and the future WFO Tallahassee Area of
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Apalachicola service area is included as
Attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for north Florida, southeast Alabama and southwest
Georgia is included as Attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage
for the specific service area will be increased, and no area will be
missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding that
there will be no degradation of service.
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, Attachment E,
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of
the system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed, but two national work-arounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, Attachment F, documents
that only two negative comments were received. Both of the negative
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the commentors as
stated in the Service Confirmation Report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies
that the existing Apalachicola WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the Liaison Officer for the
Apalachicola service area is included as Attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ________
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J).
On ____________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed
consolidation (Attachment K). I believe all negative comments have
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers, and I continue
to recommend this certification.
Endorsement
I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, National Weather Service Southern
Region, endorse this consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
Weather Service Forecast Office, 333 West University Drive,
Romeoville, IL 60441
Memorandum For: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From:
Paul W. Dailey, MIC, NWSFO Chicago
Charles T. Fenley, MIC, NWSFO Quad Cities
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Rockford Weather
Service Office (WSO) with the future Chicago Weather Forecast Office
(WFO) in Romeoville, Illinois and the future Quad Cities WFO in
Davenport, Iowa will not result in any degradation in weather
services to the Rockford service area. This proposed certification
is in accordance with the advance notification provided in the
National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, we are recommending you
approve this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law
102-567. If you concur, please endorse this recommendation and
forward this package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather
Services for final certification. If Dr. Friday approved, he will
forward the certification to the Secretary for approval and
transmittal to congress.
Our recommendation is based on review of the pertinent evidence
and application of the modernization criteria for consolidation of a
field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the
Rockford service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed
below, we find that providing the services which address these
characteristics and concerns from the future Chicago and Quad Cities
WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services traditionally provided within
the Rockford service area from the Rockford WSO location and a list
of services to be provided from the future Chicago and Quad Cities
WFO locations after consolidation is included as attachment B.
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Rockford area of
responsibility (i.e. ``affected service area'') and the future WFO
Chicago area of
[[Page 3909]]
responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Rockford service area is included as attachment
C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and WIPS) has or will be
installed and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Illinois is included as attachment D. NWS
operational radar coverage for the Rockford service area will be
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, attachment E,
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and
training operations and maintenance personnel are available on site.
Training was completed but two national workarounds remain in
effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents
that six negative comments were received. All comments have been
answered to the satisfaction of the commentors as stated in the
service Confirmation Report.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies
that the existing Marseilles WSR-74S radar is no longer needed to
support services or products for local office operations.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Rockford
service area is included at attachment H.
I have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ____________,
the Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation
(attachment K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed
to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend
this certification.
Endorsement
I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Memorandum for: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From:
William F. Fortune, MIC, NWSO Pueblo, CO
Larry E. Mooney, MIC, NWSFO Denver, CO
Scott A. Mentzer, MIC, NWSO Goodland, KS
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification
After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined,
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Colorado Springs
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Pueblo, Denver and
Goodland Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any
degradation in weather services to the Colorado Springs service
area. This proposed certificate is in accordance with the advance
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan.
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur,
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward certification
to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to Congress.
Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided to the
Colorado Springs service area is included as Attachment A. As
discussed below, we find that providing the services which address
these characteristics and concerns from the future Pueblo, Denver,
and Goodland WFOs will not degrade these services.
2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the
Colorado Springs service area from the Colorado Springs WSO location
and a list of services to be provided from the future Pueblo,
Denver, and Goodland WFO locations after the proposed consolidation
is included as Attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that
all services currently provided will continue to be provided after
the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO
Colorado Springs Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service
Area'') and the future Pueblo, Denver, and Goodland WFOs' Areas of
Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no
degradation in the quality of those services as a result of
consolidation.
3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance
services in the WSO Colorado Springs service area is included as
Attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has
or will be installed, and will enhance services.
4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of
10,000 feet for Colorado is included as Attachment D. NWS
operational radar coverage for the Colorado Springs service area
will be increased. Some blocking will occur along the western slope
of the Rampart Range of mountains but this will have only a minimal
impact on the majority of the WSO Colorado Springs service area.
5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there
will be no degradation of service:
A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from Pueblo, Denver
and Goodland, Attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance
personnel are available on site. A full compliment of spares is on-
station, but one national work-around remains in effect.
B. The User Confirmation of Services from Pueblo, Goodland, and
Denver, Attachment F, document that only two negative comments were
received at Pueblo. Four negative comments were received at Denver,
but only one pertained to the Colorado Springs Service Area. Three
negative comments were received at Goodland, but none referred to
the Colorado Springs Service Area. All negative comments have been
answered to the satisfaction of those who made negative comments as
reflected in the reports.
C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, not
applicable, there is no radar at Colorado Springs to decommission.
6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Colorado
Springs service area is included as Attachment H.
We have considered recommendations of the Modernization
Transition Committee (Attachment I) and the ________ public comments
received during the comment period (Attachment J). On ____________,
the Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation
(Attachment K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed
to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend
certification.
Endorsement
I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Attachments
[FR Doc. 96-2189 Filed 2-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M