[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3904-3909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-2189]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


National Weather Service Modernization and Associated 
Restructuring

ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Weather Service (NWS) is publishing proposed 
certifications for the proposed consolidations of:
    (1) Colorado Springs Weather Service Office (WSO) into the future 
Pueblo, Denver/Boulder and Goodland Weather Forecast Offices (WFO);
    (2) Rockford WSO into the future Chicago and Quad Cities WFOs;
    (3) Grand Island WSO into the future Hastings WFO;
    (4) Apalachicola WSO into the future Tallahassee WFO;
    (5) Pensacola WSO into the future Mobile and Tallahassee WFOs;
    (6) Tupelo WSO into the future Memphis and Jackson WFOs;
    (7) Del Rio WSO into the future Austin/San Antonio WFO; and
    (8) Bristol WSO into the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Roanoke, and 
Charleston, WV WFOs.
    In accordance with Pub. Law 102-567, the public will have 60 days 
in which to comment on these proposed consolidation certifications.

DATES: Comments are requested by April 2, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the proposed consolidation packages 
should be sent to Janet Gilmer, Room 12316, 1325 East-West Highway, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephone 301-713-0276. All comments should be 
sent to Janet Gilmer at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Julie Scanlon at 301-713-1413.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NWS anticipates consolidating:
    (1) The Colorado Springs Weather Service Office (WSO) with the 
future Pueblo, Denver/Boulder and Goodland Weather Forecast Offices 
(WFOs);
    (2) The Rockford WSO with the future Chicago and Quad Cities WFOs;
    (3) The Grand Island WSO with the future Hastings WFO;
    (4) The Apalachicola WSO with the future Tallahassee WFO;
    (5) The Pensacola WSO with the future Mobile and Tallahassee WFOs;
    (6) The Tupelo WSO with the future Memphis and Jackson WFOs;
    (7) The Del Rio WSO with the future Austin/San Antonio WFO; and
    (8) The Bristol WSO with the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Roanoke 
and Charleston, WV WFOs.
    In accordance with section 706 of Pub. Law 102-567, the Secretary 
of Commerce must certify that these consolidations will not result in 
any degradation of service to the affected areas of responsibility and 
must publish the proposed consolidation certifications in the FR. The 
documentation supporting each proposed certification includes the 
following:
    (1) A draft memorandum by the meteorologist-in-charge recommending 
the certification, the final of which will be endorsed by the Regional 
Director 

[[Page 3905]]
and the Assistant Administrator of the NWS if appropriate, after 
consideration of public comments and completion of consultation with 
the Modernization Transition Committee (the Committee);
    (2) A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns which affect the weather services provided within the 
service area;
    (3) A comparison of the services provided within the service area 
and the services to be provided after such action;
    (4) A description of any recent or expected modernization of NWS 
operation which will enhance services in the service area;
    (5) An identification of any area within the affected service area 
which would not receive coverage (at an elevation of 10,000 feet) by 
the next generation weather radar network;
    (6) Evidence, based upon operational demonstration of modernized 
NWS operations, which was considered in reaching the conclusion that no 
degradation in service will result from such action including the WSR-
88D Radar Commissioning Report(s), User Confirmation of Services 
Report(s), and the Decommissioning Readiness Report (as applicable); 
and
    (7) A letter appointing the liaison officer.
    These proposed certifications do not include any report of the 
Committee which could be submitted in accordance with sections 
706(b)(6) and 707(c) of Pub. Law 102-567. At their December 14, 1995 
meeting the members ``. . . resolved that the MTC modify its procedure 
to eliminate proposed certification consultations of noncontroversial 
closings, consolidations, relocations, and automation certifications 
but will provide final consultation on certifications after public 
comment and before final submission to the Secretary of Commerce.''
    Documentation supporting the proposed certifications is too 
voluminous to publish in its entirety. Copies of the supporting 
documentation can be obtained through the contact listed above.
    Attached to this Notice are draft memoranda by the respective 
meteorologists-in-charge recommending the certifications.
    Once all public comments have been received and considered, the NWS 
will complete consultation with the Committee and determine whether to 
proceed with the final certifications. If decisions to certify are 
made, the Secretary of Commerce must publish the final certifications 
in the FR and transmit the certifications to the appropriate 
Congressional committees prior to consolidating the offices.

    Dated: January 29, 1996.
Elbert W. Friday, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services.

Memorandum For: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region

From: Steven D. Schurr, MIC, NWSO Hastings, NE

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Grand Island 
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Hastings Weather 
Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather 
services to the Grand Island service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Grand Island service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Hastings WFO will not 
degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services provided within the Grand 
Island service area from the Grand Island WSO location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Hastings WFO location after 
the proposed consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison 
of these services shows that all services currently provided will 
continue to be provided after the proposal consolidation. Also, the 
enclosed map shows the WSO Grand Island Area of Responsibility (i.e. 
``Affected Service Area'') and the future Hastings WFO's Area of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (MWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Grand Island service area is included as 
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Nebraska and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the 
Grand Island service area will be increased and no area will be 
missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report from Hastings, 
attachment E, validates that the WSR-88D meets technical 
specifications (acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory 
operation of system interfaces and satisfactory support of 
associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service backup 
capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of operations and 
maintenance documentation is available; and spare parts and test 
equipment and trained operations and maintenance personnel are 
available on site. Training was completed but two national work-
arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Hastings, attachment 
F, documents that one negative comment was received. That negative 
comment has been answered to the satisfaction of the commentor as 
reflected in the report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Grand WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to support 
services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Grand 
Island service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ____________, 
the Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation 
(attachment K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed 
to the satisfaction of our customers and continue to recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Weather Service Forecast Office, 2090 Airport Road, New Braunfels, 
TX 78130
January 31, 1996.
Memorandum For: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region

From: Antonio A. Dreumont, South Texas Area Manager

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, that consolidation of the Del Rio 
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Austin/San Antonio 
Weather Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in 
weather services to the Del Rio area. This proposed certification is 
in accordance with the advance notification 

[[Page 3906]]
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the Del 
Rio service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed below, I 
find that providing the services which address these characteristics 
and concerns from the future Austin/San Antonio office will not 
degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Del Rio service area from the WSO Del Rio location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Austin/San Antonio WFO 
location after consolidation is included in Attachment B. Comparison 
of these services shows that all services currently provided will 
continue to be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the 
enclosed map shows the WSO Del Rio Area of Responsibility (i.e., 
``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO Austin/San Antonio 
Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will 
be no degradation in the quality of these services as a result of 
the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Del Rio service area is included as Attachment 
C. The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will 
be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Texas is included as Attachment D. NWS operational 
radar coverage for the specific service area will be increased and 
no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSO Austin/San 
Antonio, Attachment E-1, and Laughlin AFB, Attachment E-2, validate 
that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); 
are fully operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces 
and satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, Attachment F, documents 
that only one negative comment was received. The negative comment 
has been answered to the satisfaction of the commentor as stated in 
the service Confirmation Report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, is not 
applicable. There is no radar at WSO Del Rio to decommission.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Del Rio 
service area is included as Attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (Attachment I) and the ________ 
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J). 
On ____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (Attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

January 24, 1996.
Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, NWS

From:
    Jerry O. McDuffie, MIC, NWSO Knoxville/Tri-Cities, TN
    Kenneth A. Kostura, MIC, NWSO Roanoke, VA
    Alan A. Rezek, MIC, NWSFO Charleston, WV
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, We have determined, 
in our professional judgment, that consolidation of the Bristol 
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities, 
TN, Roanoke, VA, and Charleston, WV Weather Forecast Office (WFO) 
will not result in any degradation in weather services to the 
Bristol service area. This proposed certification is in accordance 
with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, We recommended that you approve 
this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If 
you concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this 
package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for 
final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Bristol service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed 
below, We find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from future WFOs Knoxville/Tri-Cities, 
TN, Roanoke, VA, and Charleston, WV will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Bristol service area from WSO Bristol and a list of services to be 
provided from the future WFO Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Roanoke, and 
Charleston, WV locations after consolidation is included as 
Attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services 
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Bristol Area of 
Responsibility (i.e., ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, We 
submit that there will be no degradation in the quality of these 
services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Bristol service area is included as Attachment 
C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned WSR-88D radar coverage at an elevation 
of 10,000 feet for east Tennessee and southwest Virginia is included 
as Attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the specific 
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSO Knoxville/
Tri-Cities, NWSO Roanoke, and NWSFO Charleston, WV, Attachment E, 
validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance 
test); are fully operational (satisfactory operation of system 
interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting 
and warning services); service backup capabilities are functioning 
properly; a full set of operations and maintenance documentation is 
available; and spare parts and test equipment, along with trained 
operations and maintenance personnel, are available on site. 
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, Attachment F, document 
that no negative comments were received.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Bristol WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the WSO 
Bristol service area is included as Attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (Attachment I) and the ________ 
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J). 
On ____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (Attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to satisfaction of our customers and I continue to 
recommend this certification.

[[Page 3907]]


Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region

From:
    Richard I. Coleman, MIC, NWSFO Memphis, TN
    Tice H. Wagner, MIC, NWSFO Jackson, MS

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Tupelo, MS Weather 
Service Office (WSO) with the future Memphis and Jackson Weather 
Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather 
services to the Tupelo service area. This proposed certification is 
in accordance with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this 
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you 
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package 
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Tupelo service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below, 
I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Memphis and Jackson 
WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Tupelo service area from the Tupelo WSO location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Memphis and Jackson WFO 
locations after consolidation is included as attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Tupelo Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Memphis Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Tupelo service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Mississippi and Tennessee is included as attachment 
D. NWS operational radar coverage for the specific service area will 
be increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for Memphis and 
Jackson, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88D meets technical 
specifications (acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory 
operation of system interfaces and satisfactory support of 
associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service backup 
capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of operations and 
maintenance documentation is available; and spare parts and test 
equipment and trained operations and maintenance personnel are 
available on site. Training was completed but two national work-
arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services for Memphis and Jackson, 
attachment F, document that the only negative comment received was 
from the manager of the AFSS. Upon further investigation, we found 
that the complaint was aimed at FAA practices rather than with WSR-
88D products and services.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing WSR-74C radar is no longer needed to support 
services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Tupelo 
service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ________ 
public comment received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe the one negative comment has 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorses this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

8400 Airport Blvd., Bldg. 11, Mobile, AL 36608
November 13, 1995.
Memorandum To: Harry S. Hassel, Director, NWS Southern Region

From:
    Randall S. McKee, MIC, NWSO Mobile, AL
    William P. Duval, MIC, NWSO Tallahassee

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, Consolidation of the Pensacola Weather 
Service Office (WSO) with the future Mobile and Tallahassee Weather 
Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any degradation of weather 
services to the Pensacola service area. This proposed certification 
is in accordance with the advance notification provided in the 
National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you 
approve this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 
102-567. If you concur, please endorse this recommendation and 
forward this package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather 
Services for final certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will 
forward the certification to the Secretary for approval and 
transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my view of the pertinent evidence 
and application of the modernization criteria for consolidation of a 
field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Pensacola service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the Mobile and Tallahassee WFOs 
will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Pensacola service area from the Pensacola WSO location and a list of 
services to be provided from the Mobile and Tallahassee WFO 
locations after consolidation is included as Attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Pensacola Area 
of Responsibility (i.e., ``Affected Service Area'') and the future 
WFO Mobile Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Pensacola service area is included as Attachment 
C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Florida is included as Attachment D. NWS operational 
radar coverage for the specific service area will be increased and 
no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of services.
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for Mobile and 
Tallahassee, Attachment E, validate that the WSR-88D meets technical 
specifications (acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory 
operation of system interfaces and satisfactory support of 
associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service backup 
capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of operations and 
maintenance 

[[Page 3908]]
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed, but two national work-arounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services for Mobile and Tallahassee, 
Attachment F, document that two negative comments were received and 
have been satisfactorily addressed as stated in the Service 
Confirmation Report. Neither degrades services to the Pensacola WSO 
area of responsibility.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Pensacola WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Pensacola 
service area is included as Attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (Attachment I) and the ________ 
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J). 
____________ We believe all concerns have been addressed to the 
satisfaction of our customers and we therefore recommend this 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Date

Attachments

Regional Airport, 3238 Capital Circle, SW, Tallahassee, FL 32310-
8723
November 3, 1995.
Memorandum For: Harry S. Hassel, Director, NWS Southern Region
From: Paul Duval, MIC NWSO Tallahassee, Florida
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined 
that in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Apalachicola 
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Tallahassee Weather 
Forecast Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather 
services to the Apalachicola service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with Section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based upon my review of the pertinent 
evidence, and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of the local weather characteristics and 
weather-related concerns affecting the weather services provided in 
the Apalachicola service area is included as Attachment A. As 
discussed below, I find that providing services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the Tallahassee WFO will not 
degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Apalachicola service area from the Apalachicola WSO location, and a 
list of services to be provided from the Tallahassee WFO location 
after consolidation is included as Attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map 
shows the WSO Apalachicola Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected 
Service Area'') and the future WFO Tallahassee Area of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Apalachicola service area is included as 
Attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for north Florida, southeast Alabama and southwest 
Georgia is included as Attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage 
for the specific service area will be increased, and no area will be 
missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding that 
there will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, Attachment E, 
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications 
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
the system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed, but two national work-arounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, Attachment F, documents 
that only two negative comments were received. Both of the negative 
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the commentors as 
stated in the Service Confirmation Report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Apalachicola WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the Liaison Officer for the 
Apalachicola service area is included as Attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ________ 
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J). 
On ____________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (Attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers, and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, National Weather Service Southern 
Region, endorse this consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Weather Service Forecast Office, 333 West University Drive, 
Romeoville, IL 60441

Memorandum For: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region

From:
    Paul W. Dailey, MIC, NWSFO Chicago
    Charles T. Fenley, MIC, NWSFO Quad Cities

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Rockford Weather 
Service Office (WSO) with the future Chicago Weather Forecast Office 
(WFO) in Romeoville, Illinois and the future Quad Cities WFO in 
Davenport, Iowa will not result in any degradation in weather 
services to the Rockford service area. This proposed certification 
is in accordance with the advance notification provided in the 
National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, we are recommending you 
approve this action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 
102-567. If you concur, please endorse this recommendation and 
forward this package to the Assistant Administrator for Weather 
Services for final certification. If Dr. Friday approved, he will 
forward the certification to the Secretary for approval and 
transmittal to congress.
    Our recommendation is based on review of the pertinent evidence 
and application of the modernization criteria for consolidation of a 
field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Rockford service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Chicago and Quad Cities 
WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services traditionally provided within 
the Rockford service area from the Rockford WSO location and a list 
of services to be provided from the future Chicago and Quad Cities 
WFO locations after consolidation is included as attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Rockford area of 
responsibility (i.e. ``affected service area'') and the future WFO 
Chicago area of 

[[Page 3909]]
responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Rockford service area is included as attachment 
C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and WIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Illinois is included as attachment D. NWS 
operational radar coverage for the Rockford service area will be 
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, attachment E, 
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications 
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
training operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed but two national workarounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents 
that six negative comments were received. All comments have been 
answered to the satisfaction of the commentors as stated in the 
service Confirmation Report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Marseilles WSR-74S radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Rockford 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (attachment J). On ____________, 
the Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation 
(attachment K). I believe all negative comments have been addressed 
to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue to recommend 
this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Memorandum for: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region

From:
    William F. Fortune, MIC, NWSO Pueblo, CO
    Larry E. Mooney, MIC, NWSFO Denver, CO
    Scott A. Mentzer, MIC, NWSO Goodland, KS

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined, 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Colorado Springs 
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Pueblo, Denver and 
Goodland Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Colorado Springs service 
area. This proposed certificate is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, we are recommending you approve this action in 
accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, 
please endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward certification 
to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided to the 
Colorado Springs service area is included as Attachment A. As 
discussed below, we find that providing the services which address 
these characteristics and concerns from the future Pueblo, Denver, 
and Goodland WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Colorado Springs service area from the Colorado Springs WSO location 
and a list of services to be provided from the future Pueblo, 
Denver, and Goodland WFO locations after the proposed consolidation 
is included as Attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that 
all services currently provided will continue to be provided after 
the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO 
Colorado Springs Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service 
Area'') and the future Pueblo, Denver, and Goodland WFOs' Areas of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of those services as a result of 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Colorado Springs service area is included as 
Attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed, and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Colorado is included as Attachment D. NWS 
operational radar coverage for the Colorado Springs service area 
will be increased. Some blocking will occur along the western slope 
of the Rampart Range of mountains but this will have only a minimal 
impact on the majority of the WSO Colorado Springs service area.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from Pueblo, Denver 
and Goodland, Attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet 
technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. A full compliment of spares is on-
station, but one national work-around remains in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Pueblo, Goodland, and 
Denver, Attachment F, document that only two negative comments were 
received at Pueblo. Four negative comments were received at Denver, 
but only one pertained to the Colorado Springs Service Area. Three 
negative comments were received at Goodland, but none referred to 
the Colorado Springs Service Area. All negative comments have been 
answered to the satisfaction of those who made negative comments as 
reflected in the reports.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, not 
applicable, there is no radar at Colorado Springs to decommission.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Colorado 
Springs service area is included as Attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Attachment I) and the ________ public comments 
received during the comment period (Attachment J). On ____________, 
the Committee voted to endorse the proposed consolidation 
(Attachment K). We believe all negative comments have been addressed 
to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue to recommend 
certification.

Endorsement

    I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

[FR Doc. 96-2189 Filed 2-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M