[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64-65]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-31548]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. EG96-24-000, et al.]
Hainan Meinan Power Company, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate
Regulation Filings
December 26, 1995.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission:
1. Hainan Meinan Power Company
[Docket No. EG96-24-000]
On December 14, 1995, Hainan Meinan Power Company (``HMPC''), with
its principal office at Room 807, Haikou International Commercial
Center, 38 Da Tong Road, Haikou, Hainon, People's Republic of China
(``PRC''), filed with the Commission an application for determination
of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to Part 365 of the
Commission's Regulations.
HMPC states that it is a joint venture organized under the laws of
the PRC. HMPC will be engaged directly and exclusively in owning an
approximately 150 MW liquified petroleum gas and distillate fuel oil-
fired electric generating facility located in Wenchang County, Hainan
Province, PRC. Electric energy produced by the facility will be sold at
wholesale to Hainan Electric Power Corporation. In no event will any
electricity be sold to consumers in the United States.
Comment date: January 12, 1996, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice. The Commission will limit its
consideration of comments to those that concern the adequacy or
accuracy of the application.
2. Kingston Cogen Limited Partnership
[Docket No. EG96-25-000]
Take notice that on December 18, 1995, Kingston Cogen Limited
Partnership (Kingston) (c/o Michael J. Zimmer, Esq., Reid & Priest LLP,
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004) filed with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application on December 18,
1995, for determination of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant
to Part 365 of the Commission's Regulations.
Kingston is an Ontario, Canada limited partnership formed to own an
electric generating facility located in Ernestown Township, Ontario,
Canada.
Comment date: January 12, 1996, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice. The Commission will limit its
consideration of comments to those that concern the adequacy or
accuracy of the application.
[[Page 65]]
3. Williams Energy Services Company
[Docket No. ER95-305-004]
Take notice that on December 4, 1995, Williams Energy Service
Company tendered for filing a Notice of Succession in the above-
referenced docket.
Comment date: January 9, 1996, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
4. Rig Gas Inc., Texas-Ohio Power Martketing, Inc.
[Docket No. ER95-480-003, Docket No. ER94-1676-005 (Not Consolidated)]
Take notice that the following information filings have been made
with the Commission and are on file and available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room:
On December 11, 1995, Rig Gas Inc. filed certain information as
required by the Commission's March 16, 1995, order in Docket No. ER95-
480-000.
On December 12, 1995, Texas-Ohio filed certain information as
required by the Commission's October 31, 1994, order in Docket No.
ER94-1676-000.
5. PacifiCorp Power Marketing, Inc.
[Docket No. ER95-1096-000]
Take notice that on December 14, 1995, PacifiCorp Power Marketing,
Inc., tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
Comment date: January 9, 1996, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
6. Northwest Regional Transmission Association
[Docket No. ER96-384-000]
Take notice that on November 14, 1995, Northwest Regional
Transmission Association tendered for filing a Notice of Withdrawal in
the above-referenced docket.
Comment date: January 9, 1996, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
7. Utility Management and Consulting Inc.
[Docket No. ER96-525-000]
Take notice that on December 18, 1995, Utility Management and
Consulting Inc. supplemented its earlier filing in this docket.
Comment date: January 8, 1996, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
8. City of College Station, Texas
[Docket No. TX96-2-000]
Take notice that on December 15, 1995, the City of College Station,
filed with the Commission an application requesting that the Commission
order the City of Bryan, Texas (Bryan) and the Texas Municipal Power
Agency (TMPA) to provide transmission services pursuant to Sections 211
and 212 of the Federal Power Act, as amended.
The name of the affected parties are as follows:
Affected State Regulatory Authority: Public Utility Commission of
Texas.
Affected Federal power marketing agency: None.
Affected Electric Utilities:
City of Bryan, Texas
Texas Municipal Power Agency
Texas Utilities Electric Company
Texas Municipal Power Pool
Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
Public Utilities Board of the City of Brownsville, Texas
Lower Colorado River Authority
Medina Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
Texas-New Mexico Power Company
South Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc.
West Texas Utilities Company
Central Power & Light Company
City of Austin, Texas
City Public Service Board of San Antonio, Texas
Houston Lighting & Power Company
College Station currently receives wholesale electric service at
points of delivery (PODs) on the transmission systems of Bryan and
TMPA, all located within the load control area of the Texas Municipal
Power Pool (TMPP). College Station seeks transmission services from
Bryan and TMPA for the delivery of power and energy from the bulk power
facilities of Texas Utilities Electric Company (TU Electric) to the
PODs located at the transmission substations of College Station. In
order to implement such service, College Station's load must be
transferred from the TMPP control area and added to TU electric's
control area by means of remote control telemetry equipment.
The proposed date for initiating the requested transmission service
is January 1, 1996. Termination of service will be coincident with the
term of College Station's Power Supply Agreement with TU electric (up
to 10 years).
The transmission service being requested by College Station is firm
transmission service over the Bryan and TMPA transmission systems at a
level and quantity sufficient for College Station to meet its loads at
the PODs, estimated to be approximately 128 MW during 1996.
Comment date: January 22, 1996, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraph
E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or
protests should be filed on or before the comment date. Protests will
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-31548 Filed 12-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P