[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66256-66264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30987]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


National Weather Service Modernization and Associated 
Restructuring

ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Weather Service (NWS) is publishing proposed 
certifications for the proposed consolidations of:
    (1) Residual New York City Weather Service Office (WSO) into the 
future New York City and Philadelphia Weather Forecast Offices (WFO);
    (2) Providence WSO into the future Boston WFO;
    (3) Worcester WSO into the future Boston WFO;
    (4) residual Kansas City WSO into the future Kansas City/Pleasant 
Hill WFO;
    (5) Detroit WSO into the future Detroit WFO;
    (6) Concordia WSO into the future Topeka, Wichita, and Hastings 
WFOs;
    (7) West Palm Beach WSO into the future Miami and Melbourne WFOs;
    (8) Daytona Beach WSO into the future Melbournes and Jacksonville 
WFOs;
    (9) Waco WSO into the future Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/
Galveston WFOs;
    (10) Beaumont/Port Arthur WSO into the future Lake Charles and 
Shreveport WFOs;
    (11) Knoxville WSO into the future Knoxville and Nashville WFOs;
    (12) Havre WSO into the future Great Falls and Missoula WFOs; and
    (13) Helena WSO into the future Great Falls WFO.
    In accordance with Public Law 102-567, the public will have 60 days 
in which to comment on these proposed consolidation certifications.

DATES: Comments are requested by February 20, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the proposed consolidation packages 
should be sent to Janet Gilmer, Room 12316, 1325 East-West Highway, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephone 301-713-0276. All comments should be 
sent to Janet Gilmer at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Scanlon at 301-713-1413.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NWS anticipates consolidating:
    (1) the residual New York City Weather Service Office (WSO) with 
the future New York City and Philadelphia Weather Forecast Offices 
(WFOs);
    (2) the Providence WSO with the future Boston WFO;
    (3) the Worcester WSO with the future Boston WFO;
    (4) the residual Kansas City WSO with the future Kansas City/
Pleasant Hill WFO;
    (5) the Detroit WSO with the future Detroit WFO;
    (6) the Concordia WSO with the future Topeka, Wichita, and Hastings 
WFOs;
    (7) the West Palm Beach WSO with the future Miami and Melbourne 
WFOs;
    (8) the Daytona Beach WSO with the future Melbourne and 
Jacksonville WFOs;
    (9) the Waco WSO with the future Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/
Galveston WFOs;
    (10) the Beaumont/Port Arthur WSO with the future Lake Charles and 
Shreveport WFOs;
    (11) the Knoxville WSO with the future Knoxville and Nashville 
WFOs;
    (12) the Havre WSO with the future Great Falls and Missoula WFOs; 
and
    (13) the Helena WSO with the future Great Falls WFO. In accordance 
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567, the Secretary of Commerce must 
certify that these consolidations will not result in any degradation of 
service to the affected areas of responsibility and must publish the 
proposed consolidation certifications in the FR. The documentation 
supporting each proposed certification includes the following:
    (1) a draft memorandum by the meteorologist-in-charge recommending 
the certification, the final of which will be endorsed by the Regional 
Director and the Assistant Administrator of the NWS if appropriate, 
after consideration of public comments and completion of consultation 
with the Modernization Transition Committee (the Committee);
    (2) a description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns which affect the weather services provided within the 
service area;
    (3) a comparison of the services provided within the service area 
and the services to be provided after such action;
    (4) a description of any recent or expected modernization of NWS 
operation which will enhance services in the service area;
    (5) an identification of any area within the affected service area 
which 

[[Page 66257]]
would not receive coverage (at an elevation of 10,000 feet) by the next 
generation weather radar network;
    (6) evidence, based upon operational demonstration of modernization 
NWS operations, which was considered in reaching the conclusion that no 
degradation in service will result from such action including the WSR-
88D Radar Commissioning Report(s) User Confirmation of Services 
Report(s), and the Decommissioning Readiness Report (as applicable); 
and
    (7) a letter appointing the liaison officer.
    These proposed certifications do not include any report of the 
Committee which could be submitted in accordance with sections 
706(b)(6) and 707(c) of Pub. Law 102-567. At its December 14, 1995 
meeting the Committee concluded that the information presented did not 
reveal any potential degradation of service and decided not to issue a 
report.
    Documentation supporting the proposed certifications is too 
voluminous to publish in its entirety. Copies of the supporting 
documentation can be obtained through the contact listed above.
    Attached to this Notice are draft memoranda by the respective 
meteorologists-in-charge recommending the certifications.
    Once all public comments have been received and considered, the NWS 
will complete consultation with the Committee and determine whether to 
proceed with the final certifications. If decisions to certify are 
made, the Secretary of Commerce must publish the final certifications 
in the FR and transmit the certifications to the appropriate 
Congressional committees prior to consolidating the offices.


    Dated: December 15, 1995.
Louis J. Boezi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Modernization.

U.S. Department of Commerce

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

National Weather Service

175 Brookhaven Avenue, Building NWS-1, Upton, NY 11973

Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing

From:
    Michael E. Wyllie, AM/MIC NWSFO New York City
    Chet Henricksen, AM/MIC NWSFO Philadelphia, PA
    Peter Ahnert, MIC NWSO Binghamton, NY

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Residual New York 
City Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the future New York City and 
Philadelphia Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the New York City service area. 
This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance 
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please 
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the New 
York City service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future New York City and 
Philadelphia WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
New York City service area from the Residual New York City WSO 
location and a list of services to be provided from the future New 
York City and Philadelphia WFO locations after the proposed 
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map 
shows the RWSO New York City Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected 
Service Area'') and the future WFO New York City Area of 
Responsibility. AD discussed below, I find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the RWSO New York City service area is included as 
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for New York and portions of surrounding areas is 
included as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the New 
York City service area will be increased and no area will be missed 
in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from New York City, 
Philadelphia and Binghamton, attachment E validate that the WSR-88Ds 
meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully 
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and 
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect. Note: Binghamton, NY 
is used as a backup but no Residual New York City services were 
transferred to Binghamton.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from New York City, 
Philadelphia and Binghamton, attachment F, document that three 
negative comments were received from New York City, Philadelphia and 
Binghamton related to the RWSO New York City service area. All 
negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the 
users as reflected in the reports.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing New York City WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the New York 
City service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

October 3, 1995.
Memorandum For: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Robert M. Thompson, NWSFO Boston AM/MIC
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Providence Weather 
Service Office (WSO) with the future Boston Weather Forecast Office 
(WFO) located in Taunton, MA, will not result in any degradation in 
weather services to the Providence service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and 

[[Page 66258]]
application of the modernization criteria for consolidation of a field 
office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Providence service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the Boston WFO will not degrade 
these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Providence service area from the Providence WSO location and a list 
of services to be provided from the Boston WFO location after 
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map 
shows the WSO Providence Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected 
Service Area'') and the future WFO Boston Area of Responsibility. As 
discussed below, I find that there will be no degradation in the 
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Providence service area is included as 
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Rhode Island is included as attachment D. NWS 
operational radar coverage for the Providence service area will be 
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report, attachment E, 
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications 
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed. There were two national work-arounds. One of 
these has been satisfied while the other one remains in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents 
that several responses required explanation. This included two 
negative comments. Two other responses expressed concern over the 
new radar. Telephone calls were placed to the four responders and 
their comments and concerns were addressed. All four responsers are 
now satisfied with our service, as stated in the Confirmation of 
Services Report.
    C. The Providence Weather Service Office does not have a network 
or local warning radar.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Providence 
service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________ 
public comments received during the comment period (attachment J). 
On ____________________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

October 3, 1995.
Memorandum for: W/ER--John T. Forsing
From: Robert M. Thompson, NWSTFO Boston AM/MIC
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Worcester Weather 
Service Office (WSO) with the future Boston Weather Forecast Office 
(WFO) located in Taunton, MA, will not result in any degradation in 
weather services to the Worcester service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Worcester service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the NWSFO Boston will not degrade 
these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Worcester service area from the Worcester WSO location and a list of 
services to be provided from the NWSFO Boston location after 
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map 
shows the WSO Worcester Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected 
Service Area'') and the future WFO Boston Area of Responsibility. As 
discussed below, I find that there will be no degradation in the 
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Worcester service area is included as attachment 
C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhanced services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for southern New England including central and west 
central Massachusetts is included as attachment D. NWS operational 
radar coverage for the Worcester service area will be increased and 
no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report, attachment E, 
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications 
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed. There were two national work-arounds. One of 
these has been satisfied while the other one remains in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents 
that several responses required explanation. This included two 
negative comments. Two other responses expressed concern over the 
new radar. Telephone calls were placed to the four responders and 
their comments and concerns were addressed. All four responsers are 
now satisfied without service, as stated in the Confirmation of 
Services Report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verified 
that the existing Worcester local warning WSR-74C radar is no longer 
needed to support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Worcester 
service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________ 
public comments received during the comment period (attachment J). 
On ____________________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, John T. Forsing, Director, Eastern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Forsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

[[Page 66259]]


Attachments

1803 North 7 Highway, Pleasant Hill, MO 64080

October 27, 1995.
Memorandum for: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: Lynn P. Maximuk, MIC NWSO Kansas City/Pleasant Hill
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    In December 1993 a change of operations occurred when most 
personnel and most services provided by the WSO at Kansas City 
International Airport were transferred to the future WFO site in 
Pleasant Hill, Missouri. At that time a Residual Weather Service 
Office (RWSO) was left at the airport site to continue the surface 
and radar observational programs. Since that time the Kansas City 
International Airport ASOS has been commissioned, and the WSR-57 
radar has been decommissioned.
    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, that consolidation of the Kansas City 
Residual Weather Service Office (RWSO) with the future Kansas City/
Pleasant Hill Weather Forecast Office (FWO) in Pleasant Hill, 
Missouri will not result in any degradation in weather services to 
the Kansas City service area. This proposed certification is in 
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this 
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you 
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package 
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the pre-
modernized Kansas City service area is included as attachment A. As 
discussed below, I find that providing the services which address 
these characteristics and concerns from the future Kansas City/
Pleasant Hill WFO will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided from the 
Kansas City RWSO location and a list of comparable services to be 
provided from the future Kansas City/Pleasant Hill WFO location 
after consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map 
shows the pre-modernized WSO Kansas City area of responsibility 
(i.e., ``affected service area'') and the future WFO Kansas City/
Pleasant Hill area of responsibility. As discussed below, I find 
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services 
as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Kansas City service area is included as 
attachment C. The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) 
has or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Kansas and Missouri is included as attachment D. NWS 
operational radar coverage for the Kansas City service area will be 
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, attachment E, 
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications 
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed but two national workarounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents 
that all comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the 
commentors as stated in the service Conformation Report. Three of 
the commentors had concerns about the automated coded radar 
observation product (ROB). They were specifically concerned about 
the lack of movement speed and direction, and the inclusion of AP in 
the reports. We have discussed these problems with those people and 
they are satisfied that the NWS is working toward a solution. These 
three users have stated that those limitations do not diminish the 
capabilities of the WSR-88D from providing superior radar 
information through their video feeds. An emergency management 
agency responded negatively due to the cost of obtaining a NIDS 
drop. They have since completed negotiations with a NIDS vendor to 
receive the WSR-88D data. Four other respondents had negative 
responses but followed with comments not directly related to the 
WSR-88D. Those comments dealt with inadequate NWR coverage and other 
NWS products or services.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Kansas City WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Kansas 
City service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________________ 
public comments received during the comment period (attachment J). 
On ____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE

9200 White Lake Rd White Lake, MI 48386

October 25, 1995.
Memorandum for: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region
From: Dean P. Gulezian, MIC, WSFO DTX
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certifiction
    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Detroit Weather 
Service Offices (WSO) with the future Detroit Weather Forecast 
Office (WFO) in White Lake, Michigan will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Detroit service area. This 
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance 
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please 
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Detroit service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from future Detroit WFO will not 
degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services traditionally provided within 
the Detroit service area from the Detroit WSO location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Detroit WFO location after 
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map 
shows the WSO Detroit area of responsibility (i.e. ``affected 
service area'') and the future WFO Detroit area of responsibility. 
As discussed below, I find that there will be no degradation in the 
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Detroit service area is 

[[Page 66260]]
included as attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and 
AWIPS) has or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Michigan is included as attachment D. NWS 
operational radar coverage for the Detroit service area will be 
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Report, attachment E, 
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications 
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed but two national work-arounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents 
that three negative comments were received. All comments have been 
answered to the satisfaction of the commentors as stated in the 
service Confirmation Report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Detroit WSR-74S radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Detroit 
service area is included at attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
____________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
Date
Memorandum for: Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central Region.
From:
    Curtis S. Holderbach, MIC (AM) NWSFRO Topeka, KS
    Richard H. Elder, MIC, NWSO Wichita, KS
    Steven D. Schurr, MIC, NWSO Hastings, NE

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, we have determined 
in our professional judgment, consolidation of the Concordia Weather 
Service Office (WSO) with the future Topeka, Wichita, and Hastings 
Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any degradation in 
weather services to the Concordia service area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advance notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, we are 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    Our recommendation is based on our review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Concordia service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, we find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Topeka, Wichita, and 
Hastings WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Concordia service area from the Concordia WSO location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Topeka, Wichita, and 
Hastings WFO locations after the proposed consolidation is included 
as attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all 
services currently provided will continue to be provided after the 
proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO 
Concordia Area of Responsibility (i.e., ``Affected Service Area'') 
and the future Topeka, Wichita and Hastings WFOs' Areas of 
Responsibility. As discussed below, we find that there will be no 
degradation in the quality of these services as a result of the 
consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWF) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Concordia service area is included as attachment 
C. The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will 
be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Kansas and portions of surrounding areas is included 
as attachment D. NWS operational radar coverage for the Concordia 
service area will be increased and no area will be missed in 
coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service:
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports from Topeka, Wichita, 
and Hastings, attachment E validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services from Topeka, Wichita, and 
Hastings, attachment F, document that no negative comments were 
received from Topeka, seven negative comments were received from 
Wichita, and one negative comment from Hastings. All negative 
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the commentors as 
reflected in the reports.
    c. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Concordia WSR-74C radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Concordia 
service area is included as attachment H.
    We have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (attachment I) and the ____________, public 
comments received during the comment period (attachment J). On 
__________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). We believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and we continue 
to recommend this certification.

4Endorsement

    I, Richard P. Augulis, Director, Central; Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Augulis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Weather Service Forecast Office

11691 S.W. 17 Street, Miami, FL 33165-2149

Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region
From:
    Paul J. Hebert, AM/MIC, Miami, FL
    Bart Hagemeyer, MIC, Melbourne, FL

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the West Palm Beach 
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Miami and Melbourne 
Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) will not result in any degradation 
in weather services to the West Palm Beach service area. This 
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance 
with section 706 of Public law 102-567. If you concur, please 
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and 

[[Page 66261]]
application of the modernization criteria for consolidation of a field 
office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the West 
Palm Beach service area is included as Attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns by the Miami and Melbourne WFOs will 
not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
West Palm Beach service area from the West Palm Beach location and a 
list of services to be provided from the Miami and Melbourne WFO 
locations after consolidation is included in Attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO West Palm Area 
of Responsibility (i.e., ``Affected Service Area'') and the future 
WFO Miami Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO West Palm Beach service area is included as 
Attachment C. The new technology (i.e., ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) 
has or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Florida is included as Attachment D. NWS operational 
radar coverage for the specific service area will be increased and 
no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSO Melbourne, 
Attachment E-1, and NWSFO Miami, Attachment E-2, validate that the 
WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully 
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and 
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, Attachments F-1 and F-2, 
document that only one negative comment was received for the Miami 
WSR-88D. The negative comment has been answered to the satisfaction 
of the commenter as stated in the service Confirmation Report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, Attachment G, verifies 
that the existing West Palm Beach WSR-74S radar is no longer needed 
to support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the West Palm 
Beach service area is included as Attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (Attachment I) and the ____________ 
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J). 
On ____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (Attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director Southern Region
From: Bart Hagemeyer, MIC, NWSO Melbourne, FL; Steve Letro, MIC, 
NWSO Jacksonville, FL

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Daytona Beach 
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Melbourne and 
Jacksonville Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Daytona Beach service area. 
This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance 
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please 
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Daytona Beach service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from Melbourne and Jacksonville WFOs 
will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Daytona Beach service area from the Daytona Beach WSO location and a 
list of services to be provided from the Melbourne and Jacksonville 
WFO locations after consolidation is included as attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Daytona Beach 
Area of Responsibility (i.e. Affected Service Area) and the future 
WFO Melbourne Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find 
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services 
as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations that will enhance services 
in the WSO Daytona Beach service area are included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Florida is included as attachment D. NWS operational 
radar coverage for the specific service area will be increased and 
no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports, attachment E, 
validate that the Melbourne and Jacksonville WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed, but two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services reports, attachment F, 
document that no negative comments were received from the WSO 
Daytona Beach service area.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Daytona Beach WSR-57 radar is no longer needed to 
support services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Daytona 
Beach service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________ 
public comment(s) received during the comment period (attachment J). 
On ____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director Southern Region
From:
    Gifford Ely, MIC, NWSFO Dallas/Fort Worth, TX
    
[[Page 66262]]

    Bill Read, MIC, NWSO Houston/Galveston, TX

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Waco Weather 
Service Office (WSO) with the future Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/
Galveston Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Waco service area. This 
proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance 
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please 
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the Waco 
service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below, I find 
that providing the services which address these characteristics and 
concerns from the future Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/Galveston 
WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Waco service area from the Waco WSO location and a list of services 
to be provided from the future Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/
Galveston WFO locations after consolidation is included as 
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services 
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Waco Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Dallas/Fort Worth Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find 
that there will be no degradation in the quality of these services 
as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Waco service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Texas is included as attachment D. The combination 
NWS and DOD operational radar coverage for the specific service area 
will be increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSFO Dallas/Fort 
Worth and NWSFO Houston/Galveston, attachment E, validate that the 
WSR-88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully 
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and 
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment and trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services for Dallas/Fort Worth and 
Houston/Galveston, attachment F, document that one negative comment 
was received from both the Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston/Galveston 
Radar Service Confirmations related to the WSO Waco Service Area. 
These negative comments have been answered to the satisfaction of 
the commentors as stated in the two attached Radar Service 
Confirmation Reports.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, verifies 
that the existing Waco WSR-74 radar is no longer needed to support 
services or products for local office operations.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Waco 
service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the 
(____________) public comments received during the comment period 
(attachment J). On (____________________), the Committee voted to 
endorse the proposed consolidation (attachment K). I believe all 
negative comments have been addressed to the satisfaction of our 
customers and I continue to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum for: Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region
From:
    David C. McIntosh, MIC, NWSO Lake Charles, LA
    Lee Harrison, MIC, NWSO Shreveport, LA

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, that consolidation of the Beaumont/
Port Arthur Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Lake 
Charles and Shreveport Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not 
result in any degradation in weather services to the Beaumont/Port 
Arthur service area. This proposed certification is in accordance 
with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this 
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you 
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package 
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Beaumont/Port Arthur service area is included as attachment A. As 
discussed below, I find that providing the services which address 
these characteristics and concerns from future WFOs Lake Charles and 
Shreveport will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Beaumont/Port Arthur service area from WSO Beaumont/Port Arthur and 
a list of services to be provided from the future WFO Lake Charles 
and Shreveport locations after consolidation is included as 
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services 
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Beaumont/Port 
Arthur Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and 
the future WFO Lake Charles Area of Responsibility. As discussed 
below, I find that there will be no degradation in the quality of 
these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Beaumont/Port Arthur service area is included as 
attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has 
or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Texas is included as attachment D. NWS operational 
radar coverage for the specific service area will be increased and 
no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernization NWS operations, played a key role in concluding 
there will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSO Lake Charles 
and Shreveport, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88D meets 
technical specifications (acceptance test); is fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment, along with trained operations and 
maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was completed 
but two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services for NWSO Lake Charles and 
Shreveport, attachment F, documents that two negative comments were 
received from NWSO Lake 

[[Page 66263]]
Charles. However, neither of the negative comments came from the 
Beaumont/Port Arthur service area. The negative comments were 
addressed and answered to the satisfaction of the users as stated in 
the Service Confirmation Report.
    C. The Decommissioning Readiness Report, attachment G, has 
already been approved and the WSR-57 radar has been decommissioned.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Beaumont/
Port Arthur service area is included as attachment H.
    I have maintained a close association with the emergency 
management community in southeast Texas and they have all expressed 
appreciation for the improved warning services they have received.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (Attachment I) and the ____________ 
public comments received during the comment period (Attachment J). 
On ____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (Attachment K). I have tried to answer all negative 
comments and responses to the satisfaction of our customers and, 
based upon their later actions and comments, I continue to recommend 
this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum for:
    Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, NWS
From:
    Jerry O. McDuffie, MIC, NWSO Knoxville/Tri-Cities, TN
    Derrel R. Martin, MIC, NWSO Nashville, TN

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, that consolidation of the Knoxville 
Weather Service Office (WSO) with the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities 
and Nashville Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) will not result in any 
degradation in weather services to the Knoxville area. This proposed 
certification is in accordance with the advanced notification 
provided in the National Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am 
recommending you approve this action in accordance with section 706 
of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please endorse this 
recommendation and forward this package to the Assistant 
Administrator for Weather Services for final certification. If Dr. 
Friday approves, he will forward the certification to the Secretary 
for approval and transmittal to Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Knoxville service area is included as attachment A. As discussed 
below, I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities 
and Nashville WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the service currently provided within the 
Knoxville service area from the WSO Knoxville location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Knoxville/Tri-Cities and 
Nashville WFO locations after consolidation is included as 
attachment B. Comparison of these services shows that all services 
currently provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. The enclosed map shows the WSO Knoxville service area 
and the future WFO Knoxville/Tri-Cities service area. As discussed 
below, I submit that there will be no degradation in the quality of 
these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the modernization of National Weather 
Service (NWS) operations which will enhance services in the WSO 
Knoxville service area is included as attachment C. The new 
technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be installed 
and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned WSR-88D radar coverage at an elevation 
of 10,000 feet for east Tennessee is included as attachment D. NWS 
operational radar coverage for the specific service area will be 
increased and no area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D Radar Commissioning Reports for NWSO Knoxville/
Tri-Cities and NWSO Nashville, attachment E, validate that the WSR-
88Ds meet technical specifications (acceptance test); are fully 
operational (satisfactory operation of system interfaces and 
satisfactory support of associated NWS forecasting and warning 
services); service backup capabilities are functioning properly; a 
full set of operations and maintenance documentation is available; 
and spare parts and test equipment, along with trained operations 
and maintenance personnel are available on site. Training was 
completed; but, two national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services for Knoxville/Tri-Cities 
and Nashville, attachment F, document that only one (1) negative 
comment was received. Followup with Monroe County indicates the main 
concern was NOAA Weather Radio coverage from the Chattanooga 
transmitter in regard to warnings, not really the WSR-88D. The 
County Director of EMA stated on October 17, 1995, after several 
months of evaluation, that the radar coverage and service to Monroe 
County is very good. Several positive comments were given.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Knoxville 
service area is included as attachment G.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment H) and the ____________ 
public comments received during the comment period (attachment I). 
On ____________________, the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment j). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certifications.

Endorsement

    I, Harry S. Hassel, Director, Southern Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Hassel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memoradum for: Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region
 From: Kenneth Mielke, AM/MIC, NWSFO Great Falls, MT
Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgement, consolidation of the Havre Weather 
Service Office (WSO) with the future Great Falls Weather Forescast 
Office (WFO) will not result in any degradation in weather services 
to the Havre service area. This proposed certification is in 
accordance with the advance notification provided in the National 
Implementation Plan. Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this 
action in accordance with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you 
concur, please endorse this recommendation and forward this package 
to the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congresss.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application of the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Harve service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below, 
I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Great Falls WFO will 
not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Havre service area from the Havre WSO location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Great Falls WFO after 
consolidation is included as attachment B. Comparison of these 
services shows that all services currently provided will continue to 
be provided after the proposed consolidation. Also, the enclosed map 
shows the WSO Havre Area of Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service 
Area''), and the future WFO Great Falls Area of Responsibility. As 
discussed below, I find that there will be no degradation in the 
quality of these services as a result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Havre service area is 

[[Page 66264]]
included as attachment C. The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and 
AWIPS) has or will be installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Montana is included as attachment D. NWS operational 
radar coverage for the Havre service area will be increased and no 
area will be missed in coverage.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Report, attachment E, 
validates that the WSR-88D meets technical specifications 
(acceptance test); is fully operational (satisfactory operation of 
system interfaces and satisfactory support of associated NWS 
forecasting and warning services); service backup capabilities are 
functioning properly; a full set of operations and maintenance 
documentation is available; and spare parts and test equipment and 
trained operations and maintenance personnel are available on site. 
Training was completed but, two national work-arounds remain in 
effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services, attachment F, documents 
that three negative comments were received, but none impacted the 
WSO Havre service area. These negative comments were answered to the 
satisfaction of the commentors, as stated in the service 
Confirmation Report.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Havre 
service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernization 
Transition Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________ 
public comments recieved during the comment period (attachment J). 
On ____________________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Potter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

Attachments

Memorandum for: Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region
From:
    Kenneth Mielke, AM/MIC, NWSFO Great Falls, MT
    Brenda Brock, MIC, NWSO Missoula, MT

Subject: Recommendation for Consolidation Certification

    After reviewing the attached documentation, I have determined, 
in my professional judgment, consolidation of the Helena Weather 
Service Office (WSO) with the future Great Falls Weather Forecast 
Office (WFO) and the Missoula Weather Forecast Office will not 
result in any degradation in weather services to the Helena service 
area. This proposed certification is in accordance with the advance 
notification provided in the National Implementation Plan. 
Accordingly, I am recommending you approve this action in accordance 
with section 706 of Public Law 102-567. If you concur, please 
endorse this recommendation and forward this package to the 
Assistant Administrator for Weather Services for final 
certification. If Dr. Friday approves, he will forward the 
certification to the Secretary for approval and transmittal to 
Congress.
    My recommendation is based on my review of the pertinent 
evidence and application for the modernization criteria for 
consolidation of a field office. In summary:
    1. A description of local weather characteristics and weather-
related concerns affecting the weather services provided in the 
Helena service area is included as attachment A. As discussed below, 
I find that providing the services which address these 
characteristics and concerns from the future Great Falls and 
Missoula WFOs will not degrade these services.
    2. A detailed list of the services currently provided within the 
Helena service area from the Helena WSO location and a list of 
services to be provided from the future Great Falls and Missoula WFO 
locations after consolidation is included as attachment B. 
Comparison of these services shows that all services currently 
provided will continue to be provided after the proposed 
consolidation. Also, the enclosed map shows the WSO Helena Area of 
Responsibility (i.e. ``Affected Service Area'') and the future WFO 
Great Falls Area of Responsibility. As discussed below, I find that 
there will be no degradation in the quality of these services as a 
result of the consolidation.
    3. A description of the recent or expected modernization of 
National Weather Service (NWS) operations which will enhance 
services in the WSO Helena service area is included as attachment C. 
The new technology (i.e. ASOS, WSR-88D, and AWIPS) has or will be 
installed and will enhance services.
    4. A map showing planned NEXRAD coverage at an elevation of 
10,000 feet for Montana is included as attachment D. NWS operational 
radar coverage for the Helena service area will be increased.
    5. The following evidence, based upon operational demonstration 
of modernized NWS operations, played a key role in concluding there 
will be no degradation of service.
    A. The WSR-88D RADAR Commissioning Reports for Great Falls and 
Missoula, attachment E, validate that the WSR-88Ds meet technical 
specifications (acceptance test); are fully operational 
(satisfactory operation of system interfaces and satisfactory 
support of associated NWS forecasting and warning services); service 
backup capabilities are functioning properly; a full set of 
operations and maintenance documentation is available; and spare 
parts and test equipment and trained operations and maintenance 
personnel are available on site. Training was completed but, two 
national work-arounds remain in effect.
    B. The User Confirmation of Services for NWSFO Great Falls and 
NWSO Missoula, attachment F, document that only three negative 
comments were received from Great Falls. All three of the negative 
comments have been answered to the satisfaction of the commentors, 
as stated in the service Confirmation Report. Two negative comments 
were received from Missoula and both were answered to the 
satisfaction of the commentors.
    6. A memorandum assigning the liaison officer for the Helena 
service area is included as attachment H.
    I have considered recommendations of the Modernation Transition 
Committee (Committee) (attachment I) and the ____________ public 
comments received during the comments period (attachment J). On 
____________________ the Committee voted to endorse the proposed 
consolidation (attachment K). I believe all negative comments have 
been addressed to the satisfaction of our customers and I continue 
to recommend this certification.

Endorsement

    I, Thomas D. Potter, Director, Western Region, endorse this 
consolidation certification.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Potter

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachments

[FR Doc. 95-30987 Filed 12-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M