[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63726-63731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-30221]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 63727]]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Justice Statistics
[OJP No. 1069]
RIN 1121-ZA26
National Criminal History Improvement Program (``NCHIP'')
Advanced State Award Program (``ASAP'')
November 7, 1995.
AGENCY: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of
Justice Statistics.
ACTION: Notice of program plan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) is publishing this
notice to announce the initiation of the National Criminal History
Improvement Program (NCHIP) Advanced State Award Program (ASAP). The
grant program implements the grant provisions of the Brady Handgun
Violence Prevention Act and the National Child Protection Act of 1993,
and those provisions of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement
Act of 1994, which pertain to the establishment, maintenance, or use of
criminal history records and criminal record systems.
DATES: Eligible states must submit applications on or before December
31, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Applications should be sent to Application Coordinator, the
Bureau of Justice Statistics, 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W., 11th Floor,
Washington, D.C. 20531.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol G. Kaplan, Chief, Criminal
History Improvement Programs, (202) 307-0759. The BJS fax number is
(202) 307-5846.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The National Criminal History Improvement Program
The National Criminal History Improvement Program (NCHIP)
implements the grant provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence
Prevention Act (Brady Act), 103 Pub.L. 159, 107 Stat. 1563, the
National Child Protection Act of 1993, 103 Pub.L. 209, 107 Stat. 2490,
and those provisions of the Violent Crime Control Act of 1994, 103
Pub.L. 322, 108 Stat. 1796, which pertain to the improvement of
criminal history record systems.
The appropriation for the NCHIP program in Fiscal Year 1995 was
$100 Million. Of this amount, $6 Million was transferred to the FBI to
support implementation of the National Instant Criminal Background
Check System (NICS), $5 Million was awarded for program evaluation,
firearm related research, and state technical assistance, and $88
Million is for direct awards to the states.
The NCHIP ``core'' program, as described in the Program
Announcement issued by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) in
November 1994, assists states in improving the quality and
accessibility of criminal history records in support of the national
record system, NICS. $83 Million was designated for this component of
the NCHIP program. Consistent with legislative preference for states
with the least advanced computerized criminal history files, $5 Million
of this $83 Million represents supplemental awards to 5 states
designated as least-advanced priority states.
The Advanced State Award Program (ASAP), formerly referred to as
the ``extended core'' program, is supported with $5 Million from the
Fiscal Year 1995 appropriation.
The NCHIP program builds on earlier efforts supported by the Bureau
of Justice Statistics and the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). These
include the BJS-administered Criminal History Record Improvement
Program (CHRI) and the BJA-administered Byrne Formula 5% set-aside
program. As described in the November 1994 program announcement, NCHIP
is closely coordinated with the Byrne Formula program and with related
activities being undertaken by the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, and Firearms.
The Advanced State Award Program
The goal of the NCHIP Advanced State Award Program (ASAP) is to
assist states in the identification of persons other than felons who
are prohibited from purchasing firearms under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(g) and
(n), as amended. This effort supports the goal of the permanent system
established under Section 102(b) of the Brady Act by enhancing the
effectiveness of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System
(NICS).
The focus of the Advanced State Award Program is on the specific
provisions (other than those pertaining to disqualified convicted
felons) of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g) and (n), as amended by the Violent
Crime Control Act of 1994, for which relevant data are available in
state and local databases. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is
implementing the Federal segment of the NICS and will make available to
states, through the NICS, data which are available from or through the
Federal systems.
Applications for funding under the Advanced State Award Program
should focus on one or more of the following categories of persons
prohibited from purchase of firearms:
Anyone who--
--is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance;
--has been adjudicated as a mental defective or been committed to a
mental institution;
--is an alien who is illegally or unlawfully in the United States;
--is subject to any court order restraining them from threatening or
committing acts of domestic violence or abuse;
--is under indictment for an offense punishable by imprisonment for
more than 1 year.
The objective of the Advanced State Award Program is to build a
body of knowledge on the access and retrieval of data on these
categories of prohibited persons for use by all the states; applicants
should not focus exclusively on benefits to their own state.
Definitions: Final Regulations defining the categories stated above
have not yet been issued. Pending release of such final definitions,
applicants may refer to Appendix B for the current working definitions
of prohibited classes other than felons. States will be advised of any
changes in such definitions where applicable.
States should recognize that the definitions in Appendix B may be
narrower than applicable definitions for prohibited firearm purchasers
under state legislation. For purposes of the ASAP program, applicable
state definitions which place broader restrictions on purchase of
firearms may be used in defining eligible projects in those states. In
those states, applicants should cite relevant state legislation, where
pertinent.
Eligibility Criteria
To be eligible to apply for additional NCHIP funding under the
Advanced State Award Program, a state must be a participant in the
FBI's Interstate Identification Index (III) at the date of application.
The same agency that submitted the state's original NCHIP application
should submit the state's application for ASAP funding. If an exception
is necessary (for example, in the case of a successor agency), contact
your BJS grant monitor.
Allowable Costs
Costs associated with developing access to databases on persons
other than felons, who are ineligible to purchase a firearm, are
allowed.
[[Page 63728]]
ASAP funds can be used to:
--investigate the existence and completeness of noncriminal history
data bases;
--evaluate the feasibility of accessing relevant noncriminal justice
data systems for purposes of background checks;
--create or upgrade noncriminal justice data bases;
--develop and/or implement protocols for accessing such systems and,
where appropriate, incorporate such data into criminal history systems;
--develop and implement procedures for making data on prohibited
persons other than felons available to the national NICS;
--develop and implement necessary protocols to ensure privacy and
confidentiality of identifiable data;
--document activities, protocols, and systems to assist other
jurisdictions in developing similar capabilities.
Where the system or procedures to be established or upgraded are
not maintained by a criminal justice agency or the agency charged with
implementation of the Brady Act, a justification for such proposed
expenditures must be included with the application.
Consistent with NCHIP program policy applicable to systems which
serve purposes other than the identification of prohibited persons,
ASAP funds are allowable to cover only that portion of system
development and implementation costs which support the NCHIP and ASAP
goals and objectives as defined in the NCHIP Program Announcement and
discussed above. Therefore, the applicant must determine (and the
application must include) a reasonable cost estimate for that portion
of a proposed effort which meets these objectives.
The Application
The application must contain a clear and concise description of the
project proposed for funding and a statement of the benefits to be
derived from the project both within the state and for other
jurisdictions. A complete budget (including applicable proration
information, where appropriate) and budget narrative must also be
included. The budget should indicate costs associated with each task
proposed for funding.
As in the original NCHIP application, the application should
indicate any linkages between what is being proposed and activities of
a similar nature that have been funded with state funds, or with funds
made available under the Byrne Formula program. The application should
also describe the relationship, if any, between the proposed efforts
and the activities being funded under the state's NCHIP award.
See Appendix A, ``Application and Administrative Requirements,''
for other information which should be included in the application.
BJS recognizes that, in some cases, an extended core activity was
proposed in the state's original NCHIP application. In order to
minimize state effort, the same, or a revised version, of the
previously submitted project description may be resubmitted for the
state's ASAP application.
Selection Criteria
Applications will be judged on a competitive basis. This means that
some applications may not be selected for funding. Applications from
different states which address the same kind of prohibited database
will be judged against each other, although more than one may be
funded.
Applications will be evaluated on the basis of the following
factors:
Evidence of the state's commitment to participate in and
support the NICS, consistent with the Attorney General's Notice in the
Federal Register on June 1, 1994;
The extent to which the state has implemented an advanced
criminal history record system (in terms of automation, arrest and
disposition reporting, fingerprint supported records, and other
relevant factors) or has provided evidence that plans are currently
being implemented to achieve such a high level of operation;
The extent to which the proposed development, use, or
enhancement of innovative procedures, or the development and
implementation of databases and/or operating policies, will be of value
to other jurisdictions;
The technical feasibility of the proposal and the extent
to which the proposal appears reasonable in light of the state's
current level of system development and statutory framework;
The extent to which the state has demonstrated commitment
to the improvement of criminal record systems through efforts supported
with state funds or awards under the BJS administered CHRI program, the
NCHIP program or the Byrne Formula program;
Reasonableness of the budget and the nature of the
proposed expenditures.
When May A State Apply?
Applications for funding under the Advanced State Award Program
will be accepted until December 31, 1995.
What is the Maximum Dollar Amount for Which A State May Apply?
In general, the maximum award will not exceed $250,000 per state.
If states wish to submit combined applications, larger award amounts
will be considered.
When Will Awards Be Made?
The selection of applications to be funded with funds appropriated
in Fiscal Year 1995 will be made after the December 31 deadline. Awards
will be announced no later than March 15, 1996. Projects can be
scheduled for up to 24 months.
Appendix A
Application and Administrative Requirements
Application Content
All applicants must submit:
Standard Form 424, Application for Federal Assistance.
Standard Form 424A, Budget Information.
OJP Form 4000/3 (Rev. 1-93), Program Narrative and
Assurances.
OJP Form 4061/6 Certifications.
OJP Form 7120/1 (Rev. 1-93), Accounting System and
Financial Capability Questionnaire (to be submitted by applicants
who have not previously received Federal funds).
Applicants are requested to submit an original and two copies of
the application and certifications to the following address:
Application Coordinator, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 633 Indiana
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20531, Phone: (202) 616-3500.
Standard Form 424 (SF-424). The SF-424, a one page sheet with 18
items, serves as a cover sheet for the entire application. This form
is required for every application for Federal assistance. No
application can be accepted without a completed, signed original SF-
424. Directions to complete each item are included on the back of
the form.
Standard Form 424A (SF-424A). All applications must include SF-
424A, Budget Information for all years of project activity.
Applicants should ensure that all appropriate columns and rows
balance. Directions to complete this form are found on page 3 of SF-
424A.
Detailed Budget. Applicants must provide a detailed
justification for all costs including the basis for computation of
these costs. For example, the detailed budget would include the
salaries of staff involved in the project and the portion of those
salaries to be paid from the award; fringe benefits paid to each
staff person; travel costs related to the project; equipment to be
purchased with the award funds; and supplies required to complete
the project.
Budget Narrative. The budget narrative closely follows the
content of the detailed budget. The narrative should relate the
items budgeted to specific tasks and allowable cost categories and
should provide a justification and explanation for the budgeted
items
[[Page 63729]]
including the criteria and data used to arrive at the estimates for
each budget category. Please note applications that include
noncompetitive contracts for the provision of specific services must
contain a sole source justification for any procurement in excess of
$25,000.
The budget narrative should indicate amounts to be made
available to agencies other than the grant recipient (for example,
the agency with responsibility for CCH, the courts, local agencies.)
Program Narrative. All applications must include a program
narrative which fully describes the expected design and
implementation of the proposed program. OJP Form 4000/3 (Rev. 1-93)
provides additional detailed instructions for preparing the program
narrative.
The narrative should include a time line of activities
indicating, for each proposed activity, the projected duration of
the activity, expected completion date, and any products expected.
The application should include a description of the roles and
responsibilities of key organizational and/or functional components
involved in project activities; and a list of key personnel
responsible for managing and implementing the major elements of the
program.
Assurances. OJP Form 4000/3 (Rev. 1-93) must be included in the
application submission. If submitting this form separate from the
SF-424, the applicant must sign and date the form to certify
compliance with the Federal statutes, regulations, and requirements
as cited.
Certification Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension, and
Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace. Applicants
should refer to the regulations cited in OJP Form, 4061/6 to
determine the certification to which they are required to attest. A
copy of OJP Form 4061/6 can be obtained from the BJS Application
Coordinator. Applicants should also review the instructions for
certification included in the regulations before completing this
form. Signature of this form provides for compliance with
certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69, ``New Restrictions
on Lobbying,'' and 28 CFR Part 67, ``Government-wide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement) and Government-wide Requirements for
Drug-Free Workplace (Grants).'' The certifications shall be treated
as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be
placed when the U.S. Department of Justice determines to award the
covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement.
Financial and Administrative Requirements
Discretionary grants are governed by the provisions of OMB
Circulars applicable to financial assistance. The circulars, with
additional information and guidance, are contained in the
``Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants,'' Office of Justice
Programs, Guideline Manual, M7100, available from the Office of
Justice Programs. This guideline manual, provided upon request, is
intended to assist grantees in the administration of funds and
includes information on allowable costs, methods of payment, Federal
rights of access to records, audit requirements, accounting systems,
and financial records.
Complete and accurate information is required relative to the
application, expenditure of funds, and program performance. The
consequences of failure to comply with program guidelines and
requirements will be determined at the discretion of the Department.
Civil Rights Obligations
All applicants for Federal financial assistance must sign
Certified Assurances that they are in compliance with the Federal
laws and regulations which prohibit discrimination in any program or
activity that receives such Federal funds. Section 809(c), Omnibus
Crime Control & Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 3789d,
provides that:
No person in any State shall on the ground of race, color,
religion, national origin, or sex be excluded from participation in,
be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under,
or denied employment in connection with any program or activity
funded in whole or in part with funds made available under this
title.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Title II of
the Americans With Disabilities Act prohibit discrimination on the
basis of disability.
The applicant agency must discuss how it will ensure
nondiscriminatory practices as they relate to:
(1) Delivery of services or benefits--to ensure that individuals
will not be denied access to services or benefits under the program
or activity on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin,
gender, age, or disability;
(2) Employment practices--to ensure that its personnel in the
program or activity are selected for employment without regard to
race, color, religion, national origin, gender, age, or disability;
and
(3) Program participation--to ensure members of any planning,
steering or advisory board, which is an integral part of the program
or activity, are not excluded from participation on the basis of
race, color, religion, national origin, gender, age or disability;
and to encourage the selection of such members who are reflective of
the diversity in the community to be served.
Audit Requirement
In October 1984, Congress passed the Single Audit Act of 1984.
On April 12, 1985, the Office of Management and Budget issued
Circular A-128, ``Audits of State and Local Governments'' which
establishes regulations to implement the Act. OMB Circular A-128,
``Audits of State and Local Governments,'' outlines the requirements
for organizational audits which apply to BJS grantees.
Disclosure of Federal Participation
Section 8136 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act
(Stevens Amendment), enacted in October 1988, requires that, ``when
issuing statements, press releases for proposals, bid solicitations,
and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole
or in part with Federal money, all grantees receiving Federal funds,
including but not limited to State and local governments, shall
clearly state (1) the percentage of the total cost of the program or
project which will be financed with Federal money, and (2) the
dollar amount of Federal funds for the project or program.''
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs
Federal Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of
Federal Programs,'' allows States to establish a process for
reviewing Federal programs in the State, to choose which programs
they wish to review, to conduct such reviews, and to make their
views known to the funding Federal agency through a State ``single
point of contact.''
If the State has established a ``single point of contact,'' and
if the State has selected this program to be included in its review
process, the applicant must send a copy of its letter or application
to the State ``single point of contact'' at the same time that it is
submitted to BJS. The letter or application submitted to BJS must
indicate that this has been done. The State must complete its review
within 60 days. The review period will begin on the date that the
letter or application is officially received by BJS. If BJS does not
receive comments from the State's ``single point of contact'' by the
end of the review period, this will be interpreted as a ``no
comment'' response.
If the State has not established a ``single point of contact,''
or if it has not selected the BJS statistics development or criminal
history improvement programs in its review process, this must be
stated in the letter or application.
Appendix B
Categories of Persons Prohibited From Receiving Firearms \1\
Persons Who Are Under Indictment for, or Have Been Convicted in Any
Court of, a Crime Punishable by Imprisonment for a Term Exceeding
One Year
This category includes any person (1) who currently is under
indictment (or ``information'') for a crime punishable by
imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, or whose case has been
referred to court-martial if he/she is in the military; or (2) who
has been convicted in any court (including, for example, a military
court) of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding
one year. (``Information'' refers to a formal accusation of a crime
made by a prosecuting attorney, as distinguished from an
``indictment'' presented by a grand jury.) The maximum sentence that
may be imposed determines whether a person is under indictment or
information for a disabling crime. Similarly, the maximum sentence
that may be imposed, rather than the actual sentence, determines
whether a person has been convicted of a disabling crime. Such a
crime includes any Federal, State, or foreign offense for which the
maximum penalty is
[[Page 63730]]
capital punishment or imprisonment in excess of one year. Indictments,
information, and convictions for the following crimes are exceptions
and are not disabling: (1) Federal or State offenses pertaining to
antitrust offenses, unfair trade practices, and other similar
business-related offenses; and (2) State offenses classified by
State law as misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment for a term of 2
years or less.
\1\ These definitions of categories of persons prohibited from
receiving firearms are pending final action by the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, U.S. Treasury Department.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any conviction which has been expunged, set aside, or for which
a person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored remains
disabling if (1) the pardon, expunction, or restoration of civil
rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport,
possess, or receive firearms, or (2) the person is prohibited by the
law where the conviction occurred, from receiving or possessing any
firearm. Also, a State's restoration of a convicted felon's civil
rights does not remove any firearms disability caused by a Federal
conviction. The burden of proof is on the applicant to prove that
his/her firearms disabilities have been removed.
Persons Who Are Fugitives From Justice
This category includes persons (1) who know they have charges
pending against them, even if only for a misdemeanor, and who leave
the State of prosecution, or (2) who leave the State in order to
avoid giving testimony in any criminal proceeding.
Persons Who Are Unlawful Users of or Addicted to Any Controlled
Substance
This category includes persons who are unlawful users of or
addicted to any controlled substance, as defined in section 102 of
the Controlled Substances Act. Controlled substances include, but
are not limited to, marijuana, depressants, stimulants, and narcotic
drugs. They do not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages,
or tobacco.
It is unlawful to use any illegal controlled substance (such as
PCP), or to use any other controlled substance (such as morphine) in
a manner other than as prescribed by a licensed physician. A person
who is ``addicted'' to a controlled substance is any individual who
is found to (1) habitually use a controlled substance so as to
endanger the health, safety, welfare, or morals of the public, or
(2) to have lost the power of self-control with reference to the
addiction.
To incur firearms disabilities, there must be evidence that a
person is a current unlawful user of, or addict to, a controlled
substance. Such unlawful use or addiction may be demonstrated by
evidence of: (1) The recent use of a controlled substance, which is
part of a pattern of unlawful use or addiction; or (2) the current
unlawful use of, or addiction to, a controlled substance.
Evidence of unlawful use or addiction includes, but is not
limited to, any of the following: a criminal record, self-admission
of use, diagnoses or other records at a drug treatment or
rehabilitation center or other medical facility, testimony or a
statement by a psychiatrist or other licensed physician who
diagnosed the symptoms or treated the person, needle marks on the
person, a failed (that is, ``positive'') drug test, or testimony of
a social acquaintance who observed the unlawful use of a controlled
substance by the person.
Concerning drug tests, failing a single drug test would give
reasonable cause for disqualifying a person from purchasing a
firearm. Federal agencies may exercise discretion in determining
when to report the ``positive'' result of a drug test for controlled
substances. For example, agencies are not required to report such
results prior to giving the person an opportunity to contest the
results of the ``test'' through a proceeding that provides due
process.
Persons Who Have Been Adjudicated as Mental Defectives or Been
Committed to a Mental Institution
The category includes persons who have been adjudicated as
mental defectives or been committed to a mental institution by a
court, board, commission, or other lawful authority. An adjudication
as a mental defective occurs when a court, board, commission, or
other lawful authority determines that an individual is mentally
retarded or of marked subnormal intelligence, mentally ill, or
mentally incompetent. Examples of persons adjudicated as mental
defectives include defendants in criminal cases who are found not
guilty by reason of insanity, and persons found to be a danger to
others as a result of a mental disorder or illness.
For there to be a disabling ``commitment'' to a mental
institution, a formal commitment by a court, board, commission, or
other legal authority is necessary. Any person who has been
committed in such a way to a mental institution involuntarily--even
for reasons other than mental defectiveness or mental illness (such
as for drug use)--is prohibited from receiving firearms. However,
the mere presence of a person in a mental institution for
observation is not a disabling commitment. Also, a voluntary
commitment to a mental institution is not disabling. ``Mental
institutions'' include mental health facilities, mental hospitals,
sanitariums, psychiatric facilities, and other facilities that
provide diagnoses by licensed professionals of mental retardation or
mental illness.
Persons Who are Aliens and are Illegally or Unlawfully in the
United States
This category includes all aliens who are unlawfully in the
United States or are not in a valid nonimmigrant or immigrant
status--except for individuals in ``immigration parole'' status (see
the note below).
Examples of persons in this category include any alien:
(1) Who has entered the country illegally;
(2) Nonimmigrant whose authorized period of admission has
expired;
(3) Student who has failed to maintain status as a student; or
(4) Under an order of deportation, whether or not he/she has
left the United States.
(Note: Aliens are not disqualified from purchasing firearms for
being in ``immigration parole'' status in the United States pursuant
to the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.,
(INA). In accordance with the INA, immigration parole may be granted
temporarily to an alien at the discretion of the U.S. Attorney
General ``for emergent reasons or for reasons deemed strictly in the
public interest.'' An example would be a person who is ineligible to
enter the United States legally, but who has been granted parole
into the United States to assist the government in an
investigation.)
Persons Who Have Been Discharged from the Armed Forces Under
Dishonorable Conditions
This category only includes persons whose separation from the
Armed Forces resulted from a dishonorable discharge. It does not
include, for example, persons whose separation from the Armed Forces
resulted from a dismissal, bad conduct discharge, or other than
honorable discharge.
Persons Who Have Renounced their United States Citizenship
This category includes persons who have formally renounced their
United States citizenship either (1) before a diplomatic or consular
officer of the United States in a foreign state, or (2) before an
officer designated by the Attorney General when the United States is
in a state of war.
Persons Who are Subject to a Court Order Restraining Them from
Committing Domestic Violence
This category includes any person who, at the time he/she
applies to receive a firearm, is under a court order that meets the
following criteria:
The order must have been issued after a hearing of
which the person subject to the order received actual notice, and at
which the person had an opportunity to participate; and
The order must restrain the person subject to the order
from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of the
person, or a child of the intimate partner or person, or engaging in
other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable
fear of bodily injury to the partner or child; and
The order must include a finding that the person
subject to the order represents a credible threat to the physical
safety of the intimate partner or child, or the order must
explicitly prohibit the use, attempted use, or threatened use of
physical force against the intimate partner or child that would
reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury.
The term ``intimate partner'' is defined as a spouse, former
spouse, an individual who is a parent of a child of the person, or
an individual who cohabitates or has cohabited with the person.
Persons Who Are Juveniles
This category covers the prohibition against the transfer of
firearms by Federal Firearms Licensees to certain underage persons.
Federal Firearms Licensees are prohibited from transferring a
shotgun or rifle to any person less than 18 years of age, and are
prohibited from transferring any other
[[Page 63731]]
firearm, including a handgun, to any person less than 21 years of age.
Jan M. Chaiken,
Director, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
[FR Doc. 95-30221 Filed 12-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P