[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 1995)] [Notices] [Pages 62875-62876] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 95-29805] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR-3911-N-03] Mortgagee Review Board Administrative Actions AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner, HUD. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In compliance with Section 202(c) of the National Housing Act, notice is hereby given of the cause and description of administrative actions taken by HUD's Mortgagee Review Board against HUD-approved mortgagees. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Heyman, Director, Office of Lender Activities and Land Sales Registration, 451 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20410, telephone (202) 708-1515. The Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD) number is (202) 708-4594. (These are not toll-free numbers). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 202(c)(5) of the National Housing Act (added by Section 142 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (Pub. L. 101-235), approved December 15, 1989) requires that HUD ``publish in the Federal Register a description of and the cause for administrative action against a HUD-approved mortgagee'' by the Department's Mortgagee Review Board. In compliance with the requirements of Section 202(c)(5), notice is hereby given of administrative actions that have been taken by the Mortgagee Review Board from July 1, 1995 through September 30, 1995. 1. The Professional Investment & Financial Group; San Gabriel, California ACTION: Settlement Agreement that includes payment to the Department of a civil money penalty in the amount of $1,000; and revision of the advertising used by the company in its HUD-FHA Title I program activities to comply with HUD-FHA requirements. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CAUSE: Use of misleading advertising by the company in connection with the HUD-FHA Title I property improvement loan program. 2. Washington Credit Union; Lynwood, Washington ACTION: Settlement Agreement that includes payment to the Department of a civil money penalty in the amount of $5,000, and corrective action to assure compliance with HUD-FHA requirements. CAUSE: A HUD monitoring review that disclosed violations of HUD-FHA Title I property improvement loan program requirements that included: failure to comply with HUD-FHA reporting requirements under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA); failure to comply with dealer approval requirements; failure to report borrowers' uncompleted property improvements; inaccurate completion certificates; and failure to resolve a borrower complaint against a dealer. 3. World Wide Credit Corporation; San Diego, California ACTION: Settlement Agreement that includes indemnification to HUD-FHA for any claim losses in connection with 10 improperly originated Title I loans; implementation of a Quality Control Plan; and payment to the Department of a civil money penalty in the amount of $1,500. CAUSE: A HUD monitoring review that disclosed violations of HUD-FHA Title I property improvement loan program [[Page 62876]] requirements that included: failure to document borrowers source of funds required for loan fees and closing costs; advising borrowers that loan fees may be deducted from loan proceeds; improperly advising borrowers to obtain gift letters; and omitting the loan disbursement date on the Note. 4. PNC Mortgage Corp. of America; Vernon Hills, Illinois ACTION: Settlement Agreement that includes a payment to the Department of $182,180; and an independent CPA review of the company's HUD-FHA insurance claims submissions covering a six-month period to determine if claims are timely submitted to HUD-FHA. CAUSE: Review by HUD's contractor of the company's HUD-FHA insurance claim submissions citing violations of HUD-FHA requirements including: untimely submissions of insurance claims; and incorrect dates on claim forms. 5. Carl I. Brown & Company; Kansas City, Missouri ACTION: Settlement Agreement that includes payment to the Department of $75,000; payment of a civil money penalty in the amount of $30,000; and corrective action by the company to assure compliance with HUD-FHA requirements. CAUSE: Review by HUD's contractor of the company's single family mortgage insurance claims submissions and loan servicing procedures that disclosed violations of HUD-FHA requirements. The violations included: overpayment by HUD of expenses paid; payment for preservation and protection work not performed; overpayment for tax refunds; improperly prepared claims submissions; inadequate quality control; improper disposition of mortgagor escrow surpluses; and inadequate servicing of defaulted loans. Dated: November 29, 1995. Nicolas P. Retsinas, Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner. [FR Doc. 95-29805 Filed 12-6-95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210-27-P