[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 230 (Thursday, November 30, 1995)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 61497-61498] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 95-29198] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 50 CFR Part 676 [Docket No.950123023-5271-02; I.D. 110795E] RIN 0648-AH38; 0648-AI09 Limited Access Management of Federal Fisheries In and Off of Alaska; Determinations and Appeals; Individual Fishing Quota Program AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule adopting as final without change two interim rules that amended regulations implementing the Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program for Pacific halibut and sablefish fixed gear fisheries in and off of Alaska. EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective November 30, 1995. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Hale, 907-586-7228. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The IFQ Program is a regulatory regime developed by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) to promote the conservation and management of Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) and sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria) stocks in Federal waters in and off of Alaska. The IFQ Program limits access to Pacific halibut and sablefish fixed gear fisheries through the annual issuance of IFQ. Holders of IFQ may harvest their IFQ, specific to species, vessel category, and regulatory area, any time during the IFQ fishing season. Further information about the IFQ Program is contained in the preamble to the final implementing regulations published at 58 FR 59375, November 9, 1993, and subsequent amendments. This action makes final several changes to the IFQ implementing regulations that were originally effected by interim rules. One interim rule reduced the two-stage appeals procedures to a single-step process, shortened the length of time required for certain appeals-related actions, and established a quota shares (QS) reserve to permit the deferred allocation of IFQ for qualified persons whose QS are in dispute at the time of annual IFQ allocation. The other interim rule allowed vessels subject to existing IFQ Program recordkeeping and observer coverage requirements to fish for IFQ species in regulatory areas for which persons aboard a vessel hold IFQ less than the total amount of IFQ species on board. These changes are described below. Changes to the Determinations and Appeals Procedures Final rules implementing the appeals procedure for limited access management of Federal fisheries in and off of Alaska became effective July 1, 1994 (59 FR 28281, June 1, 1994). A detailed explanation of the procedure for appealing initial administrative determinations appeared in the preamble of the notice of proposed rulemaking published at 59 FR 5979 on February 9, 1994. NMFS identified three changes to the final rules as necessary to improve the efficiency of the appeals process. An interim rule published at 60 FR 6448, February 2, 1995, effected these changes, as follows. 1. The first change eliminated applicants' right to appeal an appellate officer's decision to the Director, Alaska Region, NMFS (Regional Director), but retained the Regional Director's discretionary authority to renew, modify, reverse, or remand any such decision. This effectively changed the original two-stage appeals procedure to a single-step process. The original procedure provided an applicant a first-stage opportunity to appeal an initial administrative determination to an appellate officer and a second-stage opportunity to appeal the appellate officer's decision to the Regional Director. This interim rule eliminated the second-stage appeal; however, the Regional Director routinely reviews appellate officers' decisions and may reverse, modify, or remand those decisions for further consideration. The appellate officer's decision, unless acted on by the Regional Director, becomes the final agency action for purposes of judicial review 30 days after issuance. 2. The second change substantially reduced the time period within which an appellant may file an appeal from 90 Federal business days to 60 calendar days after the date of the initial administrative determination. The original appeals filing period consisted of 90 days, not including weekends and holidays. The revised appeals filing period consists of 60 calendar days unless the last day falls on a weekend or holiday. The original appeals filing period was intended to provide an appellant with a liberal period within which to prepare an appeal. NMFS determined that this period was unnecessarily long and would exacerbate expected delays in the resolution of appeals. Disputes in which two or more applicants make claims to the same vessel or catch data should be resolved at the same time. Without this change, one claimant could file a prompt appeal while another could delay filing for up to 4 months, thereby preventing the prompt issuance of disputed IFQ to the rightful party. The revised period provides appellants with adequate time to prepare and file appeals, and benefits all affected parties by accelerating the appeals process. 3. The third change shortened the period of delayed effectiveness of an appellate officer's decision from 45 Federal business days to 30 calendar days after the date the decision is issued, unless, prior to that time, the Regional Director modifies the decision, issues an order staying the effectiveness of the decision pending review, or accelerates the effectiveness date. This change also accelerated the agency's final actions on appeals. NMFS determined that 30 calendar days are adequate for the Regional Director to review an appellate officer's decision and take any necessary action, such as a stay. These changes implemented by the interim rule help to expedite the appeals process, which benefits the fishermen involved. Changes to the Establishment of QS Pools Regulations pertaining to the calculation of QS and the QS pool for an area are found at Sec. 676.20. The interim rule at 60 FR 6448, February 2, 1995, also amended Sec. 676.20(d)(3) to establish a reserve within the QS pool of each IFQ regulatory area. Without such a reserve, contested catch history would not be included in the pool, and persons without QS included in the QS pool on January 31 of any year, when annual allocations of IFQ are determined, would be unable to participate in the IFQ fisheries in that year. A problem of particular concern in the initial year of the IFQ Program was that numerous appeals involved disputes over who owned or leased a vessel that made qualified landings but not over the amount of those landings. Many of these appeals were not resolved by January 31, 1995. Failure to establish a reserve within the QS pool could have prevented the prevailing party from receiving and using IFQ during the IFQ [[Page 61498]] fishing season in 1995. It is possible that such situations may occur in the future. To correct the problem, the interim rule established a QS pool reserve for catch history that would otherwise have been withheld from the QS pool due to the pendency, at the time of annual IFQ determinations, of an appeal involving contested catch history, vessel ownership, or vessel lease data by two or more QS applicants. The interim rule allowed NMFS to set aside QS in the reserve pool for deferred award to specific appellants, and to include this QS in the total QS pool for purposes of determining the amount of IFQ to be assigned to each holder of QS. The interim rule addressed the problem that appeals involving multiparty contests could unjustly result in failure to allocate IFQ for the annual fishing season to applicants who make timely and sufficient application for participation in the IFQ Program. The QS pool reserve is used only in situations in which eligibility for qualifying pounds has been established but the appropriate party to be issued QS and resulting IFQ remains contested pending a decision. Changes to General Prohibitions Close monitoring of the harvest of IFQ halibut and IFQ sablefish is required to prevent exceeding the total allowable catch for halibut and sablefish fixed gear fisheries in each regulatory area. A regulation at Sec. 676.16(d) was designed to ensure that an IFQ holder harvested his or her IFQ only in the regulatory area specified on his or her IFQ permit. This regulation, enforced by at-sea monitoring of catches, made it unlawful for any person to retain IFQ halibut or IFQ sablefish on a vessel in excess of the total amount of unharvested IFQ, applicable to the vessel category and IFQ regulatory area in which the vessel is operating, and that is currently held by all IFQ card holders on board the vessel. The practical effect of this provision was to require persons to offload all IFQ species caught in one regulatory area before fishing IFQ in another regulatory area. IFQ holders with small amounts of IFQ in multiple regulatory areas were especially affected, because the IFQ held in one area was frequently too small to cover the IFQ species harvested in that area and another. Members of the fishing industry requested the Council to relieve the requirement specified in Sec. 676.16(d). At its meeting in June 21- 25, 1995, the Council recommended that NMFS implement an emergency rule to allow vessels required to keep daily logs and carry 100 percent observer coverage to retain IFQ halibut or IFQ sablefish in excess of the total amount of unharvested IFQ applicable to that vessel in the IFQ regulatory area in which the vessel is operating. The Council also recommended that the regulations be so amended for future years. NMFS determined that an interim rule was appropriate to effect the changes requested by the Council and, in the interim rule published at 60 FR 45378, August 31, 1995, amended Sec. 676.16(d) to allow vessel operators subject to recordkeeping and observer coverage regulations to fish for IFQ species in regulatory areas for which persons aboard the vessel hold IFQ, even when the amount of IFQ held for a specific area is less than the total amount of IFQ species on board the vessel. A vessel operator must comply with the requirements at Sec. 676.16(d), unless the vessel has an observer aboard pursuant to 50 CFR part 677 while fishing for the IFQ species in the regulatory area concerned and complies with the applicable daily fishing logbook requirements at 50 CFR 301.15, 672.5(b)(2), and 675.5(b)(2). The observer and recordkeeping requirements enable authorized officers to verify that the IFQ halibut or IFQ sablefish on board was lawfully harvested in the appropriate IFQ regulatory area by an IFQ card holder with sufficient unused IFQ applicable to the vessel category. The interim rule thus provided added flexibility to the IFQ holder's fishing schedule while still allowing NMFS to monitor closely IFQ harvests. Although the Council requested that this relief be provided in all IFQ regulatory areas, current provisions in 50 CFR 301 remain in force and partly diminish the benefits of the present action. Specifically, provisions in Sec. 301.14 require a vessel operator who intends to harvest halibut in areas 4A, 4B, 4C, or 4D to obtain a vessel clearance in designated ports before commencing harvest or landing of halibut. This vessel clearance requirement, while not in direct conflict with the interim rule, may diminish the intended effect. Any changes to the requirements of Sec. 301.14 must be approved and adopted by the International Pacific Halibut Commission. Classification This final rule finalizes actions made effective by interim rules published at 60 FR 6448 on February 2, 1995, and 60 FR 45378 on August 31, 1995. Though the requirement for prior notice and an opportunity for public comment was waived for good cause on both of the interim rules, an opportunity for comment was provided. NMFS received no comments and adopts the interim rules as final without change. In that this rule finalizes actions already in effect, a delayed effectiveness period is unnecessary and is therefore waived for good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). This final rule does not require the collection of new information, but adopts a shorter period of time within which affected persons would have to submit information. The collection of information necessary for this rule has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OMB control number 0648-0272 (regarding IFQs for Pacific halibut and sablefish), OMB control number 0648-0280 (North Pacific Fisheries Research Plan), and OMB control number 0648-0213 (logbook family of forms). This final rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of E.O. 12866. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: November 22, 1995. Gary Matlock, Program Management Officer, National Marine Fisheries Service. For the reasons set out in the preamble, the interim rules amending 50 CFR part 676 that were published at 60 FR 6448, February 2, 1995, and 60 FR 45378, August 31, 1995, are adopted as a final rule without change. [FR Doc. 95-29198 Filed 11-29-95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-F