[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 29, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61251-61252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-29158]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-59-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company, and Southern Natural Gas Company; 
Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization

November 22, 1995.
    Take notice that on November 9, 1995, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch), P.O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, and Southern Natural 
Gas Company (Southern), P.O. Box 2563, Birmingham, Alabama 35202-2563, 
filed in Docket No. CP96-59-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 
and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) for authorization to designate as an 
additional delivery point an existing interconnection between the two 
pipelines in Rankin County, Mississippi under Koch's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-430-000 and Southern's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-406-000, pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Koch and Southern state that the delivery point is required for an 
existing exchange of natural gas between the two companies, authorized 
in Docket No. CP71-166 and carried out under the terms of an agreement 
on file as Koch's Rate Schedule X-40 and Southern's Rate Schedule X-19. 
It is stated that the addition of the delivery point would not require 
any construction of facilities. It is asserted that the total volumes 
to be delivered after the addition of the 

[[Page 61252]]
requested delivery point would not exceed those presently authorized. 
It is further asserted that both companies have sufficient capacity to 
accomplish the deliveries with detriment or disadvantage to either 
company's other customers. It is explained that the proposed delivery 
point would not have any impact on either party's peak day or annual 
deliveries. It is further explained that neither pipeline's tariff 
prohibits the addition of delivery points.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-29158 Filed 11-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M