[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 12, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47320-47324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-22336]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52

[30-1-6372, VA32-1-5999; FRL-5294-1]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Virginia; Proposed Approval of Revised Confidentiality Provisions; 
Proposed Approval and Disapproval of Minor New Source Permit Provisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve in part and disapprove in part 
State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the Commonwealth 
of Virginia. This action proposes approval of changes submitted by 
Virginia in March 1993 to the provisions governing confidentiality of 
information. This action proposes disapproval of the public 
participation requirements associated with the permitting of minor new 
sources, and proposes approval of all other revisions to Virginia's 
revised new source permit provisions. The intended effect of this 
action is to propose approval of those State provisions which meet the 
requirements of the Clean Air Act, and disapprove those State 
provisions which do not.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 12, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Marcia L. Spink, Associate 
Director, Air Programs, Mailcode 3AT00, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
19107. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available 
for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air, 
Radiation, and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107; 
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, 629 East Main Street, 
Richmond, Virginia 23219.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harold A. Frankford, (215) 597-1325.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 18, 1993 and March 29, 1993, the 
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality submitted a series of 
amendments to its Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air 
Pollution as formal revisions to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). 
These SIP revision submittals are described below.

I. March 18, 1993 Submittal

    Virginia submitted revised provisions in Part II (General 
Provisions), Section 120-02-30 (Availability of Information) in order 
to establish criteria for determining confidential information. A 
definition of ``confidential information,'' including the criteria used 
to determine confidentiality, is added to Part I (General Definitions), 
Section 120-01-02 (Terms Defined).
    Section 120-02-30 is revised to (1) emphasize that emissions data 
shall be available to the public without exception; (2) provide for 
criteria to determine whether information submitted by a regulated 
entity may be kept confidential; (3) substitute non-confidential 
information for confidential information, or challenge the request to 
keep information confidential; determine an owner who files 
confidential information which does not meet the established criteria 
to be in violation of Commonwealth law. Confidential information must 
meet the following criteria:
    (1) The owner has taken measures in the past to keep such 
information confidential.
    (2) The information has not been reasonably obtainable without the 
owner's consent by private citizens or other firms. (Exception: 
Information obtained through judicial discovery based on a showing of 
``special need'' may still be kept confidential from the public.)
    (3) Information may not be readily available from sources other 
than the owner.
    (4) Disclosure of the information would cause ``substantial harm'' 
to the owner.
    Virginia also submitted additional revisions to Parts I and II 
(General Provisions). EPA will act upon these revisions in a separate 
rulemaking action.
    Virginia certified that public hearings were held on September 2, 
1992 in Abingdon, Roanoke, Lynchburg, Fredericksburg, Richmond, 
Chesapeake, and Springfield.

EPA Evaluation

    The determination of confidentiality provisions set forth in the 
definition of ``confidential information'' and the provisions of 
Section 120-02-30 have been revised to conform with the Virginia 
Administrative Code. EPA has determined that these revised provisions 
meet the requirements of 40 CFR Section 52.116(a), which requires 
states to make emissions data available for public inspection. However, 
should Virginia submit a SIP revision request on behalf of a source and 
submit information which has been judged confidential under the 
provisions of Section 120-02-30, Virginia must request EPA to consider 
confidentiality according to the provisions of 40 CFR 

[[Page 47321]]
Part 2. EPA is obligated to keep such information confidential only if 
the criteria of 40 CFR Part 2 are met.

II. March 29, 1993 Submittal

    Virginia submitted revised provisions of Part VIII, Section 120-08-
01 (Permits--new and modified stationary sources). Virginia has also 
revised Appendix R (Stationary Source Permit Exemption Levels) as part 
of this SIP revision request.

Section 120-01-08A--Applicability

    Section 120-08-01A.3 states that sources exempt from this section 
must still comply with all other applicable regulations, laws, 
ordinances and orders of governmental entities having jurisdiction 
(including the Federal government). In addition, any facility which is 
exempt from this section, but which exceeds the applicable emissions 
standard threshold of Part IV (as if it were an existing source) or the 
standard of performance threshold of Part V, shall still be subject to 
the more restrictive of these two provisions.
    Section 120-08-01A.4 is added to state that increments of 
construction or modification, unless specifically part of an approved 
planned incremental construction/modification program, shall be added 
together to determine whether such activity is subject to the 
provisions of Section 120-08-01. This provision is currently found in 
Section V.B of SIP-approved Appendix R.

Section 120-08-01B--Definitions

    Allowable emissions and potential to emit--The revised wording 
makes clear that emission limitations must be both State and Federally 
enforceable.
    Commence--from cancelled to canceled.
    Federally enforceable--extends to federally enforceable operating 
permit programs.
    ``Modification''--(1) ``Amount'' is replaced with ``uncontrolled 
emission rate''; (2) the revised definition clarifies that emissions 
associated with maintenance, repair and replacement activities which do 
not fall within the definition of ``reconstruction'' will not be 
considered ``modifications'' (3) the following exclusions are removed: 
use of an alternative fuel ordered under the 1974 Energy Supply and 
Environmental Coordination Act (ESECA), use of an alternative fuel 
ordered under section 125 of the Clean Air Act, and the change in 
ownership of an emissions unit.

Section 120-08-01C--General

    The provisions of current SIP Section 120-08-01.C.4 are deleted and 
replaced with the provisions of new Section 120-08-01G. New Section 
120-08-01C.4 is added to state that both the permit application and the 
permit itself may combine all applicable provisions of Sections 120-08-
01, 120-08-02 and 120-08-03.
Section 120-08-01D--Applications

    The provisions of current SIP Section 120-08-01D.1, describing who 
is authorized to sign the permit application, is expanded and relocated 
in Section 120-08-01D.3. Section 120-08-01D.2 states that a single 
application should identify each emissions point in the emissions unit. 
Section 120-08-01D.4 provides the text of a statement which an 
applicant must sign certifying that the information is, to the best of 
the applicant's knowledge, true, accurate and complete. Section 120-08-
01D.5 requires an applicant to provide a notice from the locality in 
which the source is located that the site and operation of the source 
are consistent with all local ordinances.

SIP Section 120-08-01F--Standards for Granting Permits

    This section is moved to Section 120-08-01H.

Section 120-08-01F--Action on Permit Application (SIP Section 120-08-
01G)

    Section 120-08-01F.1 is rewritten to state that within 30 days of 
the receipt of a permit application, the board will notify the 
applicant as to the status of the application, including (1) a 
determination as to which provisions of part VIII are applicable; (2) 
identification of deficiencies; and (3) a determination as to whether 
the permit application contains sufficient information to begin review. 
This provision further distinguishes as to what is meant by 
``sufficient'' (i.e., Virginia has enough information to begin review 
of the application), and what is meant by ``complete'' (i.e., Virginia 
has enough information to forward the application to the State Air 
Pollution Control Board for final review and analysis, as well as final 
decision).
    The provisions in subsections 120-08-01F.2 through F.5 are 
rewritten or revised to reflect that all applicable public 
participation requirements are now spelled out in Section 120-08-01G.

Section 120-08-01G--Public Participation

    Section 120-08-01G consolidates the applicable public participation 
requirements that are currently located in SIP sections 120-08-01C.4. 
and 120-08-01G.2 through G.6. This section, as revised, applies to all 
major stationary sources or major modifications with a net emissions 
increase of 100 tons per year of any single pollutant. In addition, 
Section 120-08-01G.4 specifies that applications from the following 
categories of sources shall be subject to a 30-day public comment 
period and if necessary, a public hearing:
    (1) major stationary sources and modifications with a net emissions 
increase of 100 tons per year of any single pollutant, and which are 
not subject to the requirements of either Section 120-08-02 or 120-08-
03; (2) stationary sources which have the potential for public interest 
concerning air quality issues; (3) stationary sources of which any 
provision of the permit would exceed the height allowed by the State's 
definition of good engineering practice (GEP).

Section 120-08-01I.--Application Review and Analysis

    The provisions of SIP section 120-08-01L have been moved to this 
section.

Section 120-08-01J (Former Section 120-08-01H)--Compliance 
Determination and Verification by Performance Testing

    1. Section 120-08-01J.3 adds language specifying that the owner of 
a source is responsible for conducting initial source testing, as well 
as providing the State with written report stating the results of such 
testing.
    2. Sections 120-08-01J.3, J.4, J.5, and J.6 contain revised 
provisions to conform with the revised organization of this subsection.

Section 120-08-01K--Permit Invalidation, Revocation and Enforcement 
(SIP Title: Revocation of Permit)

    1. Sections 120-08-01K.1 and K.3 contain revised provisions to 
conform with the revised organization of this subsection.
    2. Sections 120-08-01K.4 through K.9 are added to specify 
conditions under which construction and operating permits would be 
subject to enforcement action (K.4), limiting terms and conditions 
(K.5.), revocation (K.6), suspension (K.7), and civil charges, 
penalties and other relief contained under the State's regulatory and 
statutory authority (K.8). Section 120-08-01K.9 provides that the State 
shall notify applications in writing of its decision and reasons to 
change, suspend, revoke, or invalidate a permit. Reasons for revoking a 
permit include: (1) Knowingly making misstatements on the permit 
application, (2) failing to comply with the terms and conditions of the 
permit, (3) failing to comply with any emission standards applicable to 
an 

[[Page 47322]]
emissions unit included in the permit, (4) causing emissions which 
result in violations of any ambient air quality standard or applicable 
control strategy, including the SIP-enforceable emission limit in 
effect at the time that the application is submitted, and (5) failing 
to comply with the applicable provisions of Section 120-08-01. Although 
not specified in the language of Section 120-08-09K, EPA interprets the 
violation of an ``applicable control strategy'' to also include the 
violation of any applicable Prevention of Significant Deterioration 
(PSD) increment.
Section 120-08-01L--Existence of Permit No Defense (SIP Section 120-08-
01J); Section 120-08-01M--Compliance With Local Zoning Requirements 
(SIP Section 120-08-01K)

    There are no changes other than the new subsection designation 
within either of these sections.

Section 120-08-01N--Reactivation and Permanent Shutdown (New)

    This section establishes provisions for determining what 
constitutes a permanent shutdown. Section 120-08-01.N.2 provides that 
if a source is shut down permanently, the State shall revoke the permit 
by written notification to the owner, and remove the source from its 
emissions inventory. If such source chooses to resume operation, then 
the owner must apply for another permit. Section 120-08-01N.3 provides 
that where the State determines that a source has not operated for a 
year or more, it shall notify the owner in writing of its intent to 
consider the shutdown as permanent. This section further provides that 
a source owner is entitled to a formal hearing on the State's 
determination. Section 120-08-01N.4 provides that nothing would prevent 
State and the source from making a mutual determination of a mutual 
shutdown prior to any decision rendered at the formal hearing.

Section 120-08-01O--Transfer of Permits (New)

    This section establishes provisions for notifying the State when a 
permitted source undergoes transfer of ownership or change to the 
source's name. This section further establishes that a permit may not 
be transferred from one location to another or from one piece of 
equipment to another, unless the source is considered a portable 
facility under Section VII of Appendix R.

Section 120-08-01P--Circumvention

    There are no changes other than the new subsection designations 
within this section.

    Note: The following provisions of Section 120-08-01 pertain to 
sources which are not covered by the SIP, and will not be either 
reviewed or evaluated as part of this SIP revision action:

    Sections 120-08-01C.1.b, 120-08-01G.4.a, 120-08-04H.1, 120-08-
04.I.2.

Appendix R

    This Appendix, which replaces current SIP Section 2.33(g), defines 
and describes those source categories and thresholds which are either 
subject to or exempted from the provisions of Section 120-08-01. The 
provisions of Sections VI and IX of Appendix R pertain to sources which 
are not covered by the SIP, and will not be either reviewed or 
evaluated as part of this SIP revision action. New exemptions from the 
provisions of Section 120-08-01 include the following sources: (1) 
Solid fuel burning units with a maximum heat input of between 350,000 
btu/hr and 1,000,000 btu/hr; (2) new sources of volatile organic 
compounds (VOC) with uncontrolled emission rates of less than 25 tons 
per year; modified VOC sources with uncontrolled emissions increases of 
less than 10 tons per year; (3) new sources of particulate matter 
(PM10) with uncontrolled emission rates of less than 15 tons per 
year; modified PM10 sources with uncontrolled emissions increases 
of less than 10 tons per year; (4) new sources of sulfur dioxide 
(SO2) with uncontrolled emission rates of less than 40 tons per 
year; (5) new sources of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) with uncontrolled 
emission rates of less than 40 tons per year; (6) addition of, 
relocation of, or change to a woodworking machine within a wood product 
manufacturing plant; (7) all wood sawmills.
    Virginia has certified that public hearings were held on July 8, 
1992 for all of the above revisions in accordance with 40 CFR Section 
51.102. The public hearing locations were Abingdon, Roanoke, Lynchburg, 
Fredericksburg, Richmond, Chesapeake, and Springfield.
EPA Evaluation

    The Agency requirements for new source permitting are found in 40 
CFR part 51, subpart I (Review of New Sources and Modifications), 
sections 51.160 through 51.166 inclusive. Section 120-08-01 is designed 
to apply to permitting procedures for ``minor'' new sources and 
modifications, i.e., sources who would need a permit to construct or 
modify, but not be subject to the federally enforceable permitting 
requirements established for sources subject to PSD or new source 
review in nonattainment areas. EPA is satisfied that the threshold 
exemption levels established in Section 120-08-01 and Appendix R would 
not exempt sources which should be subject to the permitting procedures 
in the latter two categories. Furthermore, EPA is satisfied that the 
revised requirements in Section 120-08-01 are consistent with the 
criteria listed in Sec. 51.160. Similarly, EPA is satisfied that 
exemptions specified in specific types of emissions (such as the 
exemption of vessel emissions when calculating secondary emissions) are 
consistent with the current requirements of 40 CFR part 51, 
specifically the definition of ``secondary emissions'' found in 
Secs. 51.165(a)(1)(viii) and 51.166(b)(18).
    The provisions of Section 120-08-01N, concerning shutdowns, pertain 
only to the procedural mechanisms for permit determinations. In order 
to determine whether it is appropriate for shutdown credits to be used 
in an attainment demonstration, Virginia has developed a system which 
keeps track of shutdowns, pursuant to Section 120-08-03. Therefore, 
EPA's evaluation only focuses on the shutdown mechanism and not the 
application of shutdown credits. The shutdown mechanisms found in 
Section 120-08-01N. are consistent with the criteria listed in 
Sec. 51.160.
    While the revised provisions of Section 120-08-01 represent an 
improvement over the current SIP provisions, one revision significantly 
relaxes a current SIP requirement. According to the requirements of 40 
CFR sections 51.160 and 51.161, an approved SIP must contain legally 
enforceable procedures which provide for the opportunity for public 
comment on information submitted by owners and operators of all sources 
covered by Section 120-08-01. This requirement is addressed by the SIP-
approved provisions of Section 120-08-01C.4.a. However, the revised 
provisions of Sections 120-08-01G.1 and -01G.4.b specifically exempt 
major modifications of less than 100 tons per year from the prescribed 
public participation requirements. Therefore, the revised provisions of 
Sections 120-08-01G.1 and -01G.4.b would no longer meet the public 
participation requirements of 40 CFR Section 51.161 since certain major 
modifications currently subject to the public participation 
requirements of SIP-approved Section 120-08-01 would now be exempt from 
such requirements. Therefore, EPA proposes disapproval of 

[[Page 47323]]
Virginia's revised Sections 120-08-01G.1 and 120-08-01G.4.b. as 
revisions to the Virginia SIP.
    The revisions to the provisions of Section 120-08-01 serve to 
strengthen its overall enforceability. The definitions of ``allowable 
emissions'' and ``potential to emit'' found in Section 120-08-01B. 
clearly state that the applicable emissions rates and emissions limits 
must be federally enforceable. In addition, the permit exemption 
thresholds listed in Appendix R are consistent with those listed in 40 
CFR Sections 51.165 and 51.166. Those new and modified sources which 
would be covered by the provisions of Section 120-08-01 and which have 
the potential to emit of 100 tons or more per year consist of sources 
which are not covered by the provisions for PSD (e.g., categories of 
sources where the PSD applicability threshold is 250 tons per year or 
more) or new source review in nonattainment areas. Section 120-08-01D. 
clearly defines the ``responsible official'' required to sign any 
application form, report or compliance certification. The revised 
definition of ``modification'' has been strengthened now that the ESECA 
exemption that had been previously part of the SIP has now been 
removed. In addition, the enforceability has been strengthened since 
``uncontrolled emissions rate'' is more definitive than ``amount.'' The 
definition of ``federally enforceable'' has been expanded to include 
operating permits issued under a federally approved program.
    Section 120-08-01K expands the conditions under which the State may 
revoke a construction permit issued under this section. Although 
Section 120-08-01K.6.d. does not specifically state that Virginia will 
revoke a permit because of violation of any applicable PSD increment, 
EPA can enforce such revocation under the premise that any violation of 
the PSD increment constitutes a violation of the SIP control strategy 
in effect at the time that the application is submitted.
    The revisions to Section 120-08-01 are administrative and 
procedural in nature, and contain no emission limits. Therefore, the 
revised provisions in and of themselves will have no adverse impact on 
air quality.
    Section 51.160(a) of 40 CFR part 51 requires states to set forth 
enforceable procedures making a state agency responsible to determine 
whether the construction or modification of a facility, building, 
structure or facility will result in either (1) violations of an 
applicable control strategy, or (2) interference with the attainment or 
maintenance of a standard in the state where the source is to be 
located, or in a neighboring state. States may exempt certain sources 
and or source modifications from their permitting requirements if such 
exemptions would not violate the provisions of 40 CFR Sec. 51.160(a). 
Virginia lists its size threshold and source category exemptions in 
Appendix R. The revised Appendix R expands the threshold and categories 
of new or modified sources which would be exempt from the permitting 
requirements of Section 120-08-01.
    In its analysis supporting the revised exemption levels of Appendix 
R, Virginia states that wood sawmills and wood manufacturing operations 
now exempted from the permitting requirements of Section 120-08-01 are 
considered ``small businesses'' whose emissions are likely to be below 
the revised PM10 threshold exemption levels and thus, will not 
significantly contribute to ambient levels of PM10 standards. 
Virginia further states that such operations which meet the 
applicability requirements of Sections 120-08-02 (Major Stationary 
Sources and Major Modifications Locating in PSD Areas) or 120-08-03 
(Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications Locating in 
Nonattainment Areas) must still obtain a permit from Virginia. In 
addition, owners of sources exempted from the permitting provisions of 
Section 120-08-01 by Appendix R will not be relieved from the 
applicability requirements of Section 120-08-01A.3. as described above.
    Except as noted below, EPA has determined that the revised 
threshold exemption levels established by Virginia and listed in Part 
II of Appendix R are stringent enough that the applicable national 
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) and PSD increments will be 
protected, and that no applicable control strategy will be violated. 
EPA has concluded that the new and modified sources covered by the 
requirements of 40 CFR 52.21 and 52.24 contribute more significantly 
towards current ambient air quality levels. Although there currently 
are no PM10 nonattainment areas in Virginia, EPA requests Virginia 
to expand on its analysis that the exemptions of wood sawmills and wood 
manufacturing operations from the permitting requirements of Section 
120-08-01 (as stated in Appendix R) would meet the requirements of 40 
CFR 51.160(a).

Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve the revised provisions of Sections 120-
02-30 and 120-08-01 (except for Sections 120-08-01G.1 and -01G.4.a), as 
well as the definition of ``confidential information.'' EPA is also 
proposing approval of the revised exemption levels of Appendix R, 
provided that Virginia supply additional documentation that the 
exemptions provided for wood manufacturing operations and wood sawmills 
are consistent with all applicable Agency criteria for minor new source 
permit programs. At the same time, EPA proposes to disapprove the 
public participation requirements set forth in Sections 120-01-08G.1 
and -01G.4.a, and retain in its place the current Virginia SIP-approved 
public participation provisions of Section 120-08-01C.4.a.
    EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this 
notice or on other relevant matters. These comments will be considered 
before taking final action. Interested parties may participate in the 
Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to the EPA 
Regional office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
    Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
revision to any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to 
the state implementation plan shall be considered separately in light 
of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in 
relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
50,000.
    SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the 
Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve 
requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the 
Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the 
Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on 
any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the 
Federal-State relationship under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility 
analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic 
reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base 
its actions concerning SIPs on such 

[[Page 47324]]
grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
    Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to 
the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA the 
most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative that achieves the 
objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory requirements. 
Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan for informing and advising 
any small governments that may be significantly or uniquely impacted by 
the rule.
    EPA has determined that this proposed approval action does not 
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 
million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the 
aggregate, or to the private sector. This proposed Federal action 
proposes approval of pre-existing requirements under State or local 
law, or retains currently-existing Federal requirements. This proposed 
action imposes no new Federal requirements. Accordingly, no additional 
costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, 
result from this action.
    This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature 
by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the 
Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a 
July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary R. Nichols, Assistant Administrator 
for Air and Radiation. The OMB has exempted this regulatory action from 
E.O. 12866 review.
    The Administrator's decision to approve or disapprove the SIP 
revision pertaining to Virginia's confidentiality of information and 
minor new source permit provisions will be based on whether it meets 
the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A)-(K) of the Clean Air Act, as 
amended, and EPA regulations in 40 CFR Part 51.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, 
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: August 28, 1995.
W. Michael McCabe,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 95-22336 Filed 9-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P