[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 15, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42290-42350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-19836]
[[Page 42289]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part IV
Department of Housing and Urban Development
_______________________________________________________________________
Office of the Secretary
_______________________________________________________________________
24 CFR Part 888
Fair Market Rents for the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments
Program, Fiscal Year 1996; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 15, 1995 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 42290]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Office of the Secretary
24 CFR Part 888
[Docket No. FR-3933-N-01]
Fair Market Rents for the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments
Program--Fiscal Year 1996
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.
ACTION: Proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 1996 Fair Market Rents (FMRs).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Section 8(c)(1) of the United States Housing Act of 1937
requires the Secretary to publish FMRs annually to be effective on
October 1 of each year. FMRs are used for the Section 8 Rental
Certificate program (including space rentals by owners of manufactured
homes under that program); the Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room
Occupancy program; housing assisted under the Loan Management and
Property Disposition programs; payment standards for the Rental Voucher
program; and any other programs whose regulations specify their use.
This document provides the proposed FY 1996 FMRs at the 40th
percentile level. On March 2, 1995, HUD published the proposed rule to
revise 24 CFR part 888 to change the FMR rent standard from the 45th to
40th percentile rent level. That change was published in final on
August 15, 1995 and made effective on September 14, 1995. The final FY
1995 FMRs at the 40th percentile level also were made effective on the
same date in a separate document. That document included revised FMRs
for 131 areas that had submitted public comments HUD determined
provided a sufficient basis for such revision. In addition five areas
were added to Schedule D on the basis of surveys submitted on
manufactured home space rentals.
Because of the delay in publishing the proposed FY 1996 FMRs, the
comment period will extend beyond the October 1 statutory date for
publishing final FMRs. Therefore, there will be two final FY 1996 FMR
publications. The first publication will make the FMRs contained in
this document effective, except for the small number of areas with
proposed FMR decreases, which will continue to use the FY 1995 FMRs
until the Department has had the opportunity to assess any comments on
these reductions. The second publication, to be issued early next year,
will announce revised final FMRs for the areas for which HUD has made a
determination that the rental housing surveys submitted provided a
sufficient basis for such revision.
DATES: Comments due date: October 16, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
HUD's estimates of the FMRs as published in this Notice to the Office
of the General Counsel, Rules Docket Clerk, Room 10276, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC
20410. Communications should refer to the above docket number and title
and should contain the information specified in Section VI. To ensure
that the information is fully considered by all of the reviewers, each
commenter is requested to submit two copies of its comments, one to the
Rules Docket Clerk and the other to the Economic and Market Analysis
Staff in the appropriate HUD Field Office. A copy of each communication
submitted will be available for public inspection and copying during
regular business hours (7:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m. Eastern Time) at the above
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerald J. Benoit, Rental Assistance
Division, Office of Public and Indian Housing, telephone (202) 708-
0477. (TDD: (202) 708-0850). For technical information on the
development of schedules for specific areas or the method used for the
rent calculations, contact Michael R. Allard, Economic and Market
Analysis Division, Office of Economic Affairs, telephone (202) 708-0577
(TDD: (202) 708-0770). (These are not toll-free numbers.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (the Act) (42
U.S.C. 1437f) authorizes housing assistance to aid lower income
families in renting decent, safe, and sanitary housing. Assistance
payments are limited by FMRs established by HUD for different areas. In
general, the FMR for an area is the amount that would be needed to pay
the gross rent (shelter rent plus utilities) of privately owned,
decent, safe, and sanitary rental housing of a modest (non-luxury)
nature with suitable amenities.
II. Publication of FMRs
Section 8(c) of the Act requires the Secretary of HUD to publish
FMRs periodically, but not less frequently than annually. The
Department's regulations provide that HUD will develop FMRs by
publishing proposed FMRs for public comment and after evaluating the
public comments, publish the final FMRs (see 24 CFR 888.115). The
proposed FY 1996 FMR schedules at the end of this document list the FMR
levels for the Rental Certificate program (Schedule B), and for the
areas where the manufactured home space FMRs have had modifications
approved (Schedule D).
III. Method used to Develop FMRs
FMR Standard
The FMRs are gross rent estimates; they include shelter rent and
the cost of utilities, except telephone. HUD sets FMRs to assure that a
sufficient supply of rental housing is available to program
participants. To accomplish this objective, FMRs must be both high
enough to permit a selection of units and neighborhoods and low enough
to serve as many families as possible. The level at which FMRs are set
is expressed as a percentile point within the rent distribution of
standard quality rental housing units. The current definition used is
the 40th percentile rent, the dollar amount below which 40 percent of
the standard quality rental housing units rent. The 40th percentile
rent is drawn from the distribution of rents of units which are
occupied by recent movers (renter households who moved into their unit
within the past 15 months). Newly built units less than two years old
are excluded, and adjustments have been made to correct for the below
market rents of public housing units included in the data base.
Data Sources
HUD uses the most accurate and current data available to develop
the FMR estimates. The sources of survey data used for the base-year
estimates are:
(1) the 1990 Census, which provides statistically reliable rent
data for all FMR areas;
(2) the Bureau of the Census' American Housing Surveys (AHSs),
which are used to develop between-Census revisions for the largest
metropolitan areas and which have accuracy comparable to the decennial
Census; and
(3) the Random Digit Dialing (RDD) telephone surveys of individual
FMR areas, which are based on a sampling procedure that uses computers
to select statistically random samples of rental housing.
The base-year FMRs are updated using trending factors based on
Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for rents and utilities or HUD regional
rent change factors developed from RDD surveys. Annual average CPI data
are available individually for 102
[[Page 42291]]
metropolitan FMR areas. RDD Regional rent change factors are developed
annually for the metropolitan and nonmetropolitan parts of each of the
10 HUD geographical regions. The RDD factors are used to update the
base year estimates for all FMR areas that do not have their own local
CPI survey.
FY 1996 FMRs
This document proposes revised FMRs that reflect estimated 40th
percentile rent levels trended to April 1, 1996. The FMRs have been
calculated separately for each bedroom size category based on 1990
Census data. For most FMR areas, the ratios developed from the Census
for that area were applied to the two-bedroom FMR estimate to derive
the FMRs for the other bedroom size categories. Exceptions have been
made for areas with local bedroom size rent intervals below an
acceptable range. For those areas the bedroom size intervals selected
were the minimums determined after outliers had been excluded from the
distribution of bedroom ratios for all metropolitan areas. Higher
ratios continue to be used for three-bedroom and larger size units than
would result from using the actual market relationships. This is done
to assist the largest, most difficult to house families in finding
program-eligible units.
RDD Surveys
RDD surveys are used to obtain statistically-reliable FMR estimates
for selected FMR areas. This survey technique involves drawing random
samples of renter units occupied by recent movers. RDD surveys exclude
public housing units, units built in the past two years, seasonal
units, non-cash rental units, and those owned by relatives. A HUD
analysis has shown that the slight downward RDD survey bias caused by
including some rental units that are in substandard condition is almost
exactly offset by the slight upward bias that results from surveying
only units with telephones.
On average, about 8,000 telephone numbers need to be contacted to
achieve the target survey sample level of at least 400 eligible
responses. RDD surveys have a high degree of statistical accuracy;
there is a 95 percent likelihood that the recent mover rent estimates
developed using this approach are within 3 to 4 percent of the actual
rent value. Virtually all of the estimates will be within 5 percent of
the actual value.
Since last year's proposed FMRs were published (the FY 1995
proposed FMRs were published on June 23, 1994), HUD has conducted 39
additional RDD surveys. Based on the results of these surveys,
increased FMRs were made effective for 14 FMR areas in the separate
Notice announcing the final FY 1995 FMRs. Today's Notice proposes
reduced FMRs for the other 25 areas listed as follows:
Atlantic-Cape May, NJ
Bergen-Passaic, NJ
Bridgeport, CT
Dayton-Springfield, OH
Evansville-Henderson, IN-KY
Fitchburg-Leominster, MA
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Hartford, CT
Honolulu, HI
Jackson, MS
Jersey City, NJ
Las Vegas, NV
Miami, FL
Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ
Modesto, CA
Monmouth-Ocean, NJ
Newark, NJ
Omaha, NE-IA
Salinas, CA
Santa Rosa, CA
Stamford, CT
Trenton, NJ
Vallejo-Fairfield-Napa, CA
Ventura, CA
West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL
AHS Areas
AHSs cover the largest metropolitan areas on a four-year cycle,
encompassing nearly half of the nation's rental housing stock. The 40th
percentile rents for these areas are calculated from the distributions
of two-bedroom units occupied by recent movers. Public housing units,
newly constructed units and units that fail a housing quality test are
excluded from the rental housing distributions before the FMRs are
calculated. The proposed FY 1996 FMRs incorporate the results of the
1993 AHSs. Based on the survey results, the FMRs for 6 of these areas
are being proposed with decreases in today's Notice:
Boston, MA-NH
Oakland, CA
San Jose, CA
San Francisco, CA
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV
The AHS results for Detroit, MI and Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI,
indicated that no change was warranted in the baseline FMRs. These two
areas, therefore, had their FMRs updated in the normal manner.
New MSAs
This notice includes proposed FMRs for two new metropolitan FMR
areas based on new metropolitan area definitions made effective by OMB
on June 30, 1995:
--Grand Junction, CO MSA, which consists of Mesa County; and
--Flagstaff, AZ which consists of Coconino County AZ. The MSA consists
of Coconino and Kane County, Utah. HUD has determined, however, that
the Flagstaff FMR area shall consist only of Coconino County AZ. The
Utah County of Kane is so far removed from the Flagstaff area that it
is not considered to be part of the housing market area. Kane County
therefore is identified as a separate metropolitan FMR area under the
State of Utah listing.
IV. State Minimum FMRs
In response to numerous public inquiries expressing concern that
the FMRs in rural areas are too low to operate the program
successfully, HUD is proposing to implement a new minimum FMR policy.
The new policy would establish the FMRs at the higher of the local FMR
or the State-wide average FMR of nonmetropolitan counties, subject to a
ceiling rent cap of $450 on the nonmetropolitan State averages. In
proposing this change, HUD is recognizing the difficulty that small
PHAs in lightly populated rural areas have in developing valid FMR
appeals and the concern that their FMRs may be affected by small sample
sizes and a higher incidence of substandard housing and assisted
housing with below market rents.
The procedure for setting minimum FMRs now in effect has increased
the FMRs for areas with fewer than 100 Census interview cases to the
level of the county in the State with the lowest rent of all counties
with 100 or more cases. The proposed new procedure to establish FMR
minimums using the State nonmetropolitan averages would raise the
minimums considerably above those currently in effect for many
nonmetropolitan counties. A small number of metropolitan FMR areas also
would have their FMRs increased. There is precedent for this procedure
in that HUD already is required by law to use nonmetropolitan State
median family income averages to set the income limits for the
Department's assisted housing programs, including the Section 8
Existing program.
V. FMRs for Puerto Rico
HUD is in the process of re-benchmarking the FMRs for Puerto Rico.
While the current FMRs are higher than indicated by the 1990 Census,
there is concern that strict reliance on the Census data to establish
the FMRs may
[[Page 42292]]
not be appropriate because the housing quality measures for Puerto Rico
are inadequate. To obtain additional information on this matter, HUD
conducted specially designed RDD surveys of the San Juan, Mayaguez and
Caugas FMR areas. These surveys were modified by adding housing quality
questions to account for the greater incidence of substandard rental
housing in Puerto Rico. The surveys of San Juan and Caugas found FMR
estimates higher than 1990 Census-based estimates, but lower than the
current FMRs. The results of the Mayaguez survey suggested that the
current FMRs were correct.
Based on the RDD survey results, HUD is proposing reduced FMRs for
the San Juan and Caugas areas and a small increase reflecting the
normal inflation adjustment for the Mayaguez area. Pending completion
of the scheduled RDDs, the FMRs for the Arecibo, Aguadilla, and Ponce
areas are being proposed with changes similar to those indicated by RDD
results of the areas in Puerto Rico with comparable rents. The FMRs of
the nonmetropolitan FMR areas are being held at the current levels,
except for Isabella and Quebradillas Municipios, which, because they
are no longer part of a metropolitan area, have their FMRs proposed at
levels consistent with the other nonmetropolitan areas.
Because the surveys confirmed the concern about the accuracy of the
FMRs for Puerto Rico, HUD has decided to conduct additional RDD surveys
of the three other metropolitan FMR areas--Arecibo, Aguadilla, and
Ponce--and of the nonmetropolitan areas. Results of these surveys will
be available in time to be incorporated into the second final
publication of the FY 1996 FMRs.
VI. Manufactured Home Space FMRs
Manufactured home space FMRs are 30 percent of the applicable
Section 8 Rental Certificate program FMR for a two-bedroom unit. HUD
accepts public comments requesting modifications of these FMRs where
they are thought to be inadequate to run the program. In order to be
accepted as a basis for revising the FMRs, such comments must contain
statistically valid survey data that show the 40th percentile space
rent (excluding the cost of utilities) for the entire FMR area. This
program uses the same FMR area definitions as the Section 8 Rental
Certificate program. Manufactured home space FMR revisions are
published as final FMRs in Schedule D. Once approved, the revised
manufactured home space FMRs establish new base year estimates that are
updated annually using the same data used to update the Rental
Certificate program FMRs.
VII. FMRs for Federal Disaster Areas
Under the authority granted in 24 CFR part 899, the Secretary finds
good cause to waive the regulatory requirements that govern requests
for geographic area FMR exceptions for areas that are declared disaster
areas by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) during FY 1996.
HUD is prepared to grant disaster-related exceptions up to 10 percent
above the applicable FMRs. HUD field offices are authorized to approve
such exceptions for: (1) single-county FMR areas and for individual
county parts of multi-county FMR areas that qualify as disaster areas
under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance
Act; if (2) the PHA certifies that damage to the rental housing stock
as a result of the disaster is so substantial that it has increased the
prevailing rent levels in the affected area. Such exceptions must be
requested in writing by the responsible PHAs. Once approved by HUD,
they will remain in effect until superseded by the publication of the
final FY 1998 FMRs.
VIII. Request for Comments
HUD seeks public comments on FMR levels for specific areas.
Comments on FMR levels must include sufficient information (including
local data and a full description of the rental housing survey
methodology used) to justify any proposed changes. Changes may be
proposed in all or any one of the bedroom-size categories on the
schedule. Recommendations and supporting data must reflect the rent
levels that exist within the entire FMR area.
The Department also seeks comments on the proposal to establish
State minimum FMRs at the State-wide average of FMRs for
nonmetropolitan counties, subject to a maximum ceiling rent of $450.
This proposal may be subject to change, based on further analysis and
public comments.
HUD recommends use of professionally-conducted Random Digit Dialing
(RDD) telephone surveys to test the accuracy of FMRs for areas where
there is a sufficient number of Section 8 units to justify the survey
cost of $10,000-$12,000. Areas with 500 or more program units usually
meet this criterion, and areas with fewer units may meet it if the
actual two-bedroom FMR rent standard is significantly different than
that proposed by HUD. In addition, HUD has developed a version of the
RDD survey methodology for smaller, nonmetropolitan PHAs. This
methodology is designed to be simple enough to be done by the PHA
itself, rather than by professional survey organizations, at a cost of
$5,000 or less.
PHAs in nonmetropolitan areas may, in certain circumstances, do
surveys of groups of counties. All grouped county surveys must be
approved in advance by HUD. PHAs are cautioned that the resultant FMRs
will not be identical for the counties surveyed; each individual FMR
area will have a separate FMR based on its relationship to the combined
rent of the cluster of FMR areas.
PHAs that plan to use the RDD survey technique may obtain a copy of
the appropriate survey guide by calling HUD USER on 1-800-245-2691.
Larger PHAs should request ``Random Digit Dialing Surveys; A Guide to
Assist Larger Public Housing Agencies in Preparing Fair Market Rent
Comments.'' Smaller PHAs should obtain ``Rental Housing Surveys; A
Guide to Assist Smaller Public Housing Agencies in Preparing Fair
Market Rent Comments.''
HUD prefers, but does not mandate, the use of RDD telephone
surveys, or the more traditional method described in the small PHA
survey guide. Other survey methodologies are acceptable as long as the
surveys submitted provide statistically reliable, unbiased estimates of
the 40th percentile gross rent. Survey samples should preferably be
randomly drawn from a complete list of rental units for the FMR area.
If this is not feasible, the selected sample must be drawn so as to be
statistically representative of the entire rental housing stock of the
FMR area. In particular, surveys must include units of all rent levels
and be representative by structure type (including single-family,
duplex and other small rental properties), age of housing unit, and
geographic location. The decennial Census should be used as a starting
point and means of verification for determining whether the sample is
representative of the FMR area's rental housing stock.
Local rental housing surveys conducted with alternative methods
must include the same type of documentation required of the RDD
surveys. Specifically, PHA submissions must include:
--Identification of the 40th percentile gross rents (gross rent is rent
including the cost of utilities) and the actual distribution (or
distributions if more than one bedroom size is surveyed) of the
surveyed units rank ordered by gross rent.
--An explanation of how the rental housing sample was drawn and a
[[Page 42293]]
copy of the survey questionnaire, transmittal letter, and any publicity
materials.
--An explanation of how the contract rents of the individual units
surveyed were converted to gross rents. (For RDD surveys HUD requires
use of the Section 8 utility allowance schedule.)
--An explanation of how the survey excluded units built within two
years prior to the survey date.
--The date the rent data were collected so that HUD can apply a
trending factor to update the estimate to April 1, 1996. If the survey
has already been trended to this date, the date the survey was
conducted and a description of the trending factor used.
--Copies of all survey sheets.
Since FMRs are based on standard quality units and units occupied
by recent movers, both of which are difficult to identify and survey,
HUD will accept surveys of all rental units and apply appropriate
adjustments.
Most surveys cover only two-bedroom units, in which case HUD will
make the adjustments for other size units consistent with the
differentials established on the basis of the 1990 Census data for the
FMR area. When three- and four-bedroom units are surveyed separately to
determine FMRs for these unit size categories, the commenter should
multiply the 40th percentile survey rents by 1.087 and by 1.077,
respectively, to determine the FMRs. The use of these factors will
produce the same upward adjustments in the rent differentials as those
used in the HUD methodology.
IX. Other Matters
A Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to the environment
as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4374) is unnecessary, since the Section 8 Rental Certificate program is
categorically excluded from the Department's National Environmental
Policy Act procedures under 24 CFR 50.20(d).
The undersigned, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 605(b)), hereby certifies that this Notice does not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
because FMRs do not change the rent from that which would be charged if
the unit were not in the Section 8 program.
The General Counsel, as the Designated Official under Executive
Order No. 12606, The Family, has determined that this Notice will not
have a significant impact on family formation, maintenance, or well-
being. The Notice amends Fair Market Rent schedules for various Section
8 assisted housing programs, and does not affect the amount of rent a
family receiving rental assistance pays, which is based on a percentage
of the family's income.
The General Counsel, as the Designated Official under section 6(a)
of Executive Order No. 12611, Federalism, has determined that this
Notice will not involve the preemption of State law by Federal statute
or regulation and does not have Federalism implications. The Fair
Market Rent schedules do not have any substantial direct impact on
States, on the relationship between the Federal government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibility among the
various levels of government.
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program number is
14.156, Lower-Income Housing Assistance Program (section 8).
Accordingly, the Fair Market Rent Schedules, which will be codified
in 24 CFR Part 888, are amended as follows:
Dated: August 4, 1995.
Henry G. Cisneros,
Secretary.
Fair Market Rents for the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program
Schedules B and D--General Explanatory Notes
1. Geographic Coverage
a. The FMRs shown in Schedule B incorporate the Office of
Management and Budget's (OMB) most current definitions of metropolitan
areas (with the exceptions discussed in paragraph b). HUD uses the OMB
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and Primary Metropolitan
Statistical Area (PMSA) definitions for FMR areas because they closely
correspond to housing market area definitions. FMRs are housing market-
wide rent estimates that are intended to provide housing opportunities
throughout the geographic area in which rental housing units are in
direct competition.
b. The exceptions are counties deleted from seven large
metropolitan areas whose revised OMB definitions were determined by HUD
to be larger than the housing market areas. The FMRs for the following
counties (shown by the metropolitan area) are calculated separately and
are shown in Schedule B within their respective States under the
``Metropolitan FMR Areas'' listing:
Metropolitan Area and Counties Deleted
Atlanta, GA--Carroll, Pickens, and Walton Counties.
Chicago, IL--DeKalb, Grundy and Kendall Counties.
Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN--Brown County, Ohio; Gallatin, Grant and
Pendleton Counties in Kentucky; and Ohio County, Indiana.
Dallas, TX--Henderson County.
Lafayette, LA--St. Landry and Acadia Parishes.
New Orleans, LA--St. James Parish.
Washington, DC--Berkeley and Jefferson Counties in West Virginia; and
Clarke, Culpepper, King George and Warren counties in Virginia.
c. FMRs also are established for nonmetropolitan counties and for
county equivalents in the United States, for nonmetropolitan parts of
counties in the New England states and for FMR areas in Puerto Rico,
the Virgin Islands, and the Pacific Islands.
d. FMRs for the areas in Virginia shown in the table below were
established by combining the Census data for the nonmetropolitan
counties with the data for the independent cities that are located
within the county borders. Because of space limitations, the FMR
listing in Schedule B includes only the name of the nonmetropolitan
county. The complete definitions of these areas including the
independent cities are as follows:
Virginia Nonmetropolitan County FMR Area and Independent Cities Included
------------------------------------------------------------------------
County Cities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allegheny........................ Clifton Forge and Covington
Augusta.......................... Staunton and Waynesboro
Carroll.......................... Galax
Frederick........................ Winchester
Greensville...................... Emporia
Halifax.......................... South Boston
Henry............................ Martinsville
Montgomery....................... Radford
Rockbridge....................... Buena Vista and Lexington
Rockingham....................... Harrisonburg
Southhampton..................... Franklin
Wise............................. Norton
------------------------------------------------------------------------
e. FMRs for Section 8 manufactured home spaces are 30 percent of
the two-bedroom Section 8 Rental Certificate program FMRs, with the
exception of the areas listed in Schedule D whose manufactured home
space FMRs have been revised on the basis of public comments. Once
approved, the revised manufactured home space FMRs establish new base-
year estimates that are updated annually using the same data used to
estimate the Rental Certificate program FMRs. The FMR area definitions
used for manufactured home spaces are the same as for the Section 8
Certificate program.
2. Arrangement of FMR Areas and Identification of Constituent Parts
a. The FMR areas in Schedule B are listed alphabetically by
metropolitan
[[Page 42294]]
FMR area and by nonmetropolitan county within each State. The exception
FMRs for manufactured home spaces in Schedule D are listed
alphabetically by State.
b. The constituent counties (and New England towns and cities)
included in each metropolitan FMR area are listed immediately following
the listings of the FMR dollar amounts. All constituent parts of a
metropolitan FMR area that are in more than one State can be identified
by consulting the listings for each applicable State.
c. Two nonmetropolitan counties are listed alphabetically on each
line of the nonmetropolitan county listings.
d. The New England towns and cities included in a nonmetropolitan
part of a county are listed immediately following the county name.
e. The FMRs are listed by dollar amount on the first line beginning
with the FMR area name.
BILLING CODE 4210-32-P
[[Page 42295]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.056
[[Page 42296]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.057
[[Page 42297]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.058
[[Page 42298]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.059
[[Page 42299]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.060
[[Page 42300]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.061
[[Page 42301]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.062
[[Page 42302]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.063
[[Page 42303]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.064
[[Page 42304]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.065
[[Page 42305]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.066
[[Page 42306]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.067
[[Page 42307]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.068
[[Page 42308]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.069
[[Page 42309]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.070
[[Page 42310]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.071
[[Page 42311]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.072
[[Page 42312]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.073
[[Page 42313]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.074
[[Page 42314]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.075
[[Page 42315]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.076
[[Page 42316]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.077
[[Page 42317]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.078
[[Page 42318]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.079
[[Page 42319]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.080
[[Page 42320]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.081
[[Page 42321]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.082
[[Page 42322]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.083
[[Page 42323]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.084
[[Page 42324]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.085
[[Page 42325]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.086
[[Page 42326]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.087
[[Page 42327]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.088
[[Page 42328]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.089
[[Page 42329]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.090
[[Page 42330]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.091
[[Page 42331]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.092
[[Page 42332]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.093
[[Page 42333]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.094
[[Page 42334]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.095
[[Page 42335]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.096
[[Page 42336]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.097
[[Page 42337]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.098
[[Page 42338]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.099
[[Page 42339]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.100
[[Page 42340]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.101
[[Page 42341]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.102
[[Page 42342]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.103
[[Page 42343]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.104
[[Page 42344]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.105
[[Page 42345]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.106
[[Page 42346]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.107
[[Page 42347]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.108
[[Page 42348]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.109
[[Page 42349]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.110
[[Page 42350]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP15AU95.111
[FR Doc. 95-19836 Filed 8-14-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-32-P