[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 154 (Thursday, August 10, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40761-40763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-19719]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
49 CFR Part 390
[FHWA Docket No. MC-93-17]
RIN 2125-AD14
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations; General; Intermodal
Transportation
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; petitions for reconsideration of effective date;
final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Several petitioners requested an extension of the effective
date of, and certain exemptions from, the final rule implementing the
Intermodal Safe Container Transportation Act of 1992. On May 25, 1995
(60 FR 27700), the FHWA requested comments on the major issues raised
by these petitioners. The FHWA has determined that a further extension
is warranted and, therefore, is extending the effective date of the
final rule until September 1, 1996 to allow the intermodal
transportation industry sufficient time to comply by means of
electronic data interchange and to allow the FHWA, the intermodal
transportation industry, and other parties enough time to inform
affected domestic and foreign entities of their responsibilities.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 1, 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Peter C. Chandler, Office of Motor
Carrier Research and Standards, HCS-10, (202) 366-5763; or Mr. Charles
E. Medalen, Office of the Chief Counsel, HCC-20, (202) 366-1354,
Federal Highway Administration, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC
20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 29, 1994, the FHWA published a final rule which
implemented the requirements of the Intermodal Safe Container
Transportation Act of 1992 (the Act) (Pub. L. 102-548, 106 Stat. 3646,
partly codified at 49 U.S.C. 5901-5907 (formerly 49 U.S.C. 501 and
508)). The original effective date of the final rule was June 27, 1995.
The final rule requires any person who presents a container or trailer
with a gross cargo weight of more than 4,536 kilograms or 10,000 pounds
to an initial carrier for intermodal transportation to provide a
certification to such carrier. Motor carriers are prohibited from
accepting a loaded container or trailer prior to receiving a tangible
certification. Motor carriers, rail carriers, water carriers, ocean
common carriers, and intermediaries that receive a certification in the
course of intermodal transportation must forward the certification to a
subsequent carrier transporting the loaded container or trailer. The
objective of the final rule is to reduce the number of overweight motor
vehicles transporting intermodal containers or trailers by improving
communication between shippers and motor carriers.
[[Page 40762]]
Petitions
During April and May 1995, the FHWA received letters from several
companies and industry groups petitioning for an extension of the
effective date of the final rule. Among those requesting an extension
were APL Land Transport Services, Inc.; the European Shippers'
Councils; ``K'' Line America, Inc.; the Intermodal Safe Container
Coalition (Coalition); the National Industrial Transportation League;
the Steamship Association of Southern California; and, Warren &
Associates, a law firm representing two freight conferences.
On May 16, 1995 (60 FR 26001), the FHWA administratively extended
the June 27, 1995, effective date until September 27, 1995, to allow
the agency sufficient time to consider public comment on whether a
further extension was warranted. On May 25, 1995 (60 FR 27700), the
FHWA requested comments on whether an extension of the effective date
of the final rule beyond September 27, 1995, was necessary. As a part
of the second publication, the FHWA requested comments on a petition
filed by the American Trucking Associations, Inc. (ATA) to exempt three
types of motor carrier operations from the rule.
General Discussion of the Comments
Forty-six comments were received in response to the May 25, 1995,
publication. Of these, twenty-two were from companies connected with
intermodal transportation, nineteen from industry associations, two
from individuals, and one each from a safety organization, a public
association, and a port.
Comments Regarding Effective Date
Three parties supported a further extension, but recommended no
specific effective date. One party recommended an effective date one
year after publication of the final determination of the petitions.
Seven parties supported a January 1, 1996, effective date. Seventeen
parties supported a May 1, 1996, effective date. One party supported an
effective date in the spring of 1996. Five parties supported a June 1,
1996, effective date. One party supported a September 1, 1996,
effective date. Of the parties who supported a specific date, three
stated that an additional extension may be necessary. Two parties
opposed a further extension.
Electronic Data Interchange
The intermodal transportation industry relies heavily on electronic
data interchange (EDI). In order to forward certifications by EDI, the
intermodal transportation industry, in particular rail and water
carriers, need to complete the following steps: The development of
standards; preliminary analysis and design; computer programming; field
testing and coordination; training; and final computer programming. The
Union Pacific System and the Coalition commented that the American
National Standards Institute and the Intermodal Association of North
America have incorporated the necessary changes in their EDI Standard
3050 to accommodate a certification. The Coalition commented that EDI
standard 3050 will be available in July, 1995, but Union Pacific and
the Coalition stated that this standard will not become effective for
the railroad industry until September 1, 1995. Union Pacific and the
Association of American Railroads (AAR) explained further that
railroads must be able to receive information via this standard by this
date, but are not required to be able to send information via this
standard until September 1, 1996. The Coalition and the AAR stated that
one year from the effective date of a new standard is normally allowed
for full implementation because of the complexity of the process. The
Coalition explained that any company using a standard previous to EDI
standard 3050 must modify the previous standard to accommodate a
certification. Burlington Northern Railroad commented that programming
the new or modified EDI standard will take until May, 1996 and that
testing the standard and assisting their customers in the transition to
the standard will take until September, 1996.
Based on the information submitted by the commenters, the FHWA has
determined that a further extension of the effective date of the final
rule is warranted. The FHWA extends the effective date of the final
rule until September 1, 1996 to allow the intermodal transportation
industry sufficient time to complete the necessary steps to achieve
compliance with the final rule through the use of EDI.
Education
Several commenters to the May 25, 1995, publication asserted that a
further extension of the effective date is necessary to provide
sufficient time to educate affected parties in their responsibilities.
Some commenters stated that there is a widespread lack of knowledge of
the Act and the implementation of regulations outside the United States
and expressed concern about the difficult task of educating foreign
entities. Some commenters also made suggestions about the FHWA's
educational efforts. Several stressed that the agency should make
educational materials available prior to the effective date. The FHWA
agrees that additional time is needed to educate affected domestic and
foreign entities in order to avoid large disruptions in trade and
commerce which may result from inadvertent failures to comply with the
rule. The extension of the effective date until September 1, 1996, will
enable the FHWA and cooperating entities to distribute educational
materials and will also provide the intermodal transportation industry
additional time to familiarize appropriate parties with their
responsibilities.
Educational pamphlets, in English, which provide an overview of the
final rule are now available for distribution. Individuals and
companies interested in obtaining the pamphlet should contact the local
FHWA Office of Motor Carriers in their area. The pamphlet will also be
available in German, French, Spanish, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese in
the near future. Pamphlets will be provided to various associations for
domestic and international distribution. In addition, the Department of
State will assist the FHWA with the international distribution of the
pamphlets. The FHWA will also request the assistance of various
embassies with this task.
Petition for Exemptions by the American Trucking Associations, Inc.
On April 7, 1995, the ATA filed a petition to exempt three types of
motor carrier operations from the final rule. In response to the May
25, 1995, publication, the ATA and the National Industrial
Transportation League (NITL) modified the third exemption requested and
stated that they would also submit by August 1, 1995, a joint petition
requesting further changes to the rule. In view of these developments,
the FHWA will defer until a later time any discussion of the ATA and
ATA/NITL petitions, as well as the comments already submitted on the
ATA's petition for three exemptions.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The FHWA has previously determined that the final rule implementing
the Intermodal Safe Container Transportation Act of 1992 is a
significant regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order
12866 and significant under Department of Transportation regulatory
policies and
[[Page 40763]]
procedures because it affects intermodal transportation and attracts
substantial public interest. As such, the final rule was reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of the Secretary of
Transportation before being published. This present action only extends
the effective date of the final rule and provides clarification of the
rule. It is anticipated that the economic impact of this action will be
minimal; therefore, a full regulatory evaluation is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), the FHWA has evaluated the effects of this action on small
entities. Based upon this evaluation, as well as for the reasons set
forth in the previous paragraph, the FHWA hereby certifies that this
action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Executive Order 12612 (Federalism Assessment)
This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 12612, and it has been determined
that this action does not have sufficient Federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism assessment. Nothing in this
action directly preempts any State law or regulation.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.217, Motor
Carrier Safety. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and
activities apply to this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements contained in the December
29, 1994, final rule have been approved by the Office of Management and
Budget in accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and assigned the control number of
2125-0557 which expires on June 30, 1997. This action does not affect
the recordkeeping requirements previously established.
National Environmental Policy Act
The agency has analyzed this rulemaking for the purpose of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
has determined that this action would not have any effect on the
quality of the environment.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.
The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda
in April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document can be used to cross reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 390
Highway safety, Highways and roads, Intermodal transportation,
Motor carriers, Recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5901-5907, 31132, 31136, 31502 and 31504;
49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on August 3, 1995.
Rodney E. Slater,
Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-19719 Filed 8-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P