[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 141 (Monday, July 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37914-37916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-18132]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 37915]]


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. 95-56; Notice 1]


Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1996 
Mercedes-Benz Gelaendewagen Type 463 Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles 
Are Eligible for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Request for comments on petition for decision that 
nonconforming 1996 Mercedes-Benz Gelaendewagen Type 463 multi-purpose 
passenger vehicles (MPVs) are eligible for importation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice requests comments on a petition submitted to the 
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for a decision 
that a 1996 Mercedes-Benz Gelaendewagen Type 463 MPV that was not 
originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor 
vehicle safety standards is eligible for importation into the United 
States because it has safety features that comply with, or are capable 
of being altered to comply with, all such standards.

DATE: The closing date for comments on the petition is August 23, 1995.

ADDRESS: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice number, 
and be submitted to: Docket Section, Room 5109, National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 
20590. [Docket hours are from 9:30 am to 4 pm.]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-
5306).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) (formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(I) 
of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (the Act)), a 
motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all 
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall be refused 
admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the 
motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally 
manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, 
certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115 (formerly section 114 of the Act), and 
of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be 
compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all 
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards. Where there is no 
substantially similar U.S.-certified motor vehicle, 49 U.S.C. 
30141(a)(1)(B) (formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(II) of the Act, 15 
U.S.C. 1397(c)(3)(A)(i)(II) permits a nonconforming motor vehicle to be 
admitted into the United States if its safety features comply with, or 
are capable of being altered to comply with, all applicable Federal 
motor vehicle safety standards based on destructive test data or such 
other evidence as NHTSA decides to be adequate.
    Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either 
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice 
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords 
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the 
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the 
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is 
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in 
the Federal Register.
    Europa International, Inc. of Santa Fe, New Mexico (Registered 
Importer No. R-91-002) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 1996 
Mercedes-Benz Gelaendewagen Type 463 MPVs are eligible for importation 
into the United States. Europa contends that this vehicle is eligible 
for importation under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) because it has safety 
features that comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply 
with, all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
    Specifically, the petitioner claims that the 1996 Mercedes-Benz 
Gelaendewagen Type 463 MPV has safety features that comply with 
Standard Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence * * *. (based on 
visual inspection and operation), 103 Defrosting and Defogging Systems 
(based on inspection), 104 Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems (based 
on operation), 106 Brake Hoses (based on visual inspection of 
certification markings), 107 Reflecting Surfaces (based on visual 
inspection), 113 Hood Latch Systems (based on information in owner's 
manual describing operation of secondary latch mechanism), 116 Brake 
Fluids (based on visual inspection of certification markings and 
information in owner's manual describing fluids installed at factory), 
119 New Pneumatic Tires for Vehicles other than Passenger Cars (based 
on visual inspection of certification markings), 124 Accelerator 
Control Systems (based on operation and comparison to U.S. certified 
vehicles), 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact (based on test 
data and certification of vehicle to European standard), 202 Head 
Restraints (based on Standard No. 208 test data for prior model year 
vehicle with same head restraint and certification of vehicle to 
European standard), 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement (based 
on test film), 205 Glazing Materials (based on visual inspection of 
certification markings), 207 Seating Systems, (based on test results 
and certification of vehicle to European standard), 209 Seat Belt 
Assemblies (based on wiring diagram of seat belt warning system and 
visual inspection of certification markings), 211 Wheel Nuts, Wheel 
Discs and Hubcaps (based on visual inspection), 214 Side Impact 
Protection (based on test results for prior model year vehicle), 219 
Windshield Zone Intrusion (based on test results and certification 
information for prior model year vehicle), and 302 Flammability of 
Interior Materials (based on composition of upholstery).
    The petitioner also contends that the 1996 Mercedes-Benz 
Gelaendewagen Type 463 MPV is capable of being altered to comply with 
the following standards, in the manner indicated:
    Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: (a) Substitution of a lens 
marked ``Brake'' for a lens with an ECE symbol on the brake failure 
indicator lamp; (b) installation of a speedometer/odometer calibrated 
in miles per hour.
    Standard No. 105 Hydraulic Brake Systems: Placement of warning 
label on brake fluid reservoir cap.
    Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated 
Equipment: (a) Installation of U.S.-model sealed beam headlamps; (b) 
installation of U.S.-model side marker lamps and reflectors; (c) 
installation of a high mounted stop lamp. The petitioner asserts that 
testing performed on the taillamp reveals that it complies with the 
standard, even though it lacks a DOT certification marking, and that 
all other lights are DOT certified.
    Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Inscription of the required 
warning statement on the convex surface of the passenger side rearview 
mirror.
    Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: Installation of a warning buzzer 
in the steering lock electrical circuit.
    Standard No. 115 Vehicle Identification Number: Installation of a 
VIN plate that can be read from outside the left windshield pillar.
    Standard No. 118 Power-Operated Window Systems: Rewiring of the 
power window system so that the window transport is inoperative when 
the front doors are open.

[[Page 37916]]

    Standard No. 120 Tire Selection and Rims for Vehicles other than 
Passenger Cars: Installation of a tire information placard. The 
petitioner asserts that even though the tire rims lack a DOT 
certification marking, they comply with the standard, based on their 
manufacturer's certification that they comply with the German TUV 
regulations, as well as their certification by the British Standards 
Association and the Rim Association of Australia.
    Standard No. 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components: 
Installation of interior locking buttons on all door locks and 
modification of rear door locks to disable latch release controls when 
locking mechanism is engaged.
    Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: Installation of a 
complying driver's side air bag and a seat belt warning system. The 
petitioner asserts that the vehicle conforms to the standard's injury 
criteria at the front passenger position based on a test report from 
the vehicle's manufacturer.
    Standard No. 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages: Insertion of 
instructions on the installation and use of child restraints in the 
owner's manual for the vehicle. The petitioner asserts that the vehicle 
is certified as complying with a European standard that contains more 
severe force application requirements than those of this standard.
    Standard No. 212 Windshield Retention. Application of cement to the 
windshield's edges.
    Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: Installation of a rollover 
valve.
    Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition 
described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be 
submitted to: Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration, Room 5109, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 
20590. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
    All comments received before the close of business on the closing 
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for 
examination in the docket at the above address both before and after 
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing 
date will also be considered. Notice of final action will be published 
in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; 
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

    Issued on July 19, 1995.
Marilynne Jacobs,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-18132 Filed 7-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P