[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 126 (Friday, June 30, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34259-34284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-16174]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Program Announcement No. ACYF-HS 93600-954]


Fiscal Year 1995 Discretionary Announcement for Head Start 
Research Projects and Program Projects; Availability of Funds and 
Request for Applications

AGENCY: Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF), 
Administration for Children and Families (ACF).

ACTION: Announcement of the availability of funds and request for 

[[Page 34260]]
applications for six priority areas related to Head Start.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Administration for Children and Families, Administration 
on Children, Youth and Families, announces the availability of funds 
for research activities in three priority areas; for demonstrations in 
two priority areas; and for the establishment of the Head Start Fellows 
Program.

DATES: The closing date for the receipt of applications under this 
announcement is 5:30 p.m. (Eastern Time Zone) on August 16, 1995. 
Applications will be considered as meeting the deadline if they are 
received on or before the receipt date at the address below.

ADDRESSES: Applications are to be mailed to: Head Start Discretionary 
Funds Program Announcement, Priority Area ________, (ACYF/HS 93600-
954), Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for 
Children and Families, Division of Discretionary Grants, 370 L'Enfant 
Promenade SW, Washington, DC 20447.
    HAND CARRIED PACKAGES, COURIER, OR OVERNIGHT DELIVERY APPLICATION 
PACKAGES are accepted during the normal working hours of 8 a.m. to 5:30 
p.m., (Eastern Time Zone), Monday through Friday, on or prior to the 
established closing date at: Head Start Discretionary Funds Program 
Announcement Priority Area ________, (ACYF/HS 93600-954, U.S. 
Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children 
and Families, Division of Discretionary Grants, 6th Floor, 901 D 
Street, SW (ACF Guard Station to call DDG at 401-9234), Washington DC 
20447.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Administration on Children, Youth and 
Families, Head Start Bureau, P.O. Box 1182, Washington, DC 20013 
Contacts for priority areas are:

1.01  Esther Kresh 202/205-8115
1.02  Esther Kresh 202/205-8115
1.03  James Griffin 202/205-8138
1.04  Dennis Gray 202/205-8404
1.05  Trellis Waxler 202/205-8422
1.06  Frankie Gibson 202/205-8399

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Part I. Introduction

A. Contents of This Announcement

    This program announcement is divided into four sections:
     Part I provides background and recent history of the Head 
Start program and the research activities related to Head Start. 
Included is the rationale for the combined announcement and the 
statutory authority.
     Part II includes the review process and the evaluation 
criteria.
     Part III includes the description of each of the priority 
areas.
     Part IV provides instructions for the development and 
submission of an application and contains the necessary forms.

B. Background and Recent History

    Head Start provides comprehensive educational, health, nutritional, 
social and other services primarily to low-income preschool children 
age three to the age of compulsory school attendance, and their 
families. An essential feature of every Head Start program is the 
involvement of parents, both in the development of their children and 
in the direction of the program at the local level.
    In fiscal year 1994, the Advisory Committee on Head Start Quality 
and Expansion issued its recommendations for improvement and expansion. 
The recommendations were designed to build upon Head Start's impressive 
track record of success in working with low-income children and 
families.
    That success was based on three principles: Head Start's 
comprehensive approach, its commitment to parents and its community 
focus. As Head Start looks toward the 21st century it will continue to 
build on the concept of Head Start serving as a central community 
institution for low-income children and their families. Head Start 
will: (1) Ensure quality and strive to attain excellence in every local 
Head Start program, (2) respond flexibly to the needs of today's 
children and their families and (3) forge new partnerships at the 
community, State and Federal levels, renewing and recrafting these 
partnerships to fit the changes in families, communities, and state and 
national policy.
    Included in this announcement is a range of activities that will 
keep Head Start preeminent in the field of early childhood and family 
support programs. The size of the program, its comprehensive services, 
the diversity of the population served and the fact that it is 
federally funded makes it ideal as a national laboratory for best 
practices in early childhood and family support services. As Head Start 
is expanding and renewing itself there is a concomitant need for more 
research. Head Start is continuing to highlight emerging research and 
to encourage dialogue between the research community and practitioners.
    As Head Start continues to work to better meet the needs and build 
on the strengths of children and families, it is useful to study 
successful approaches from other settings and to explore promising 
practices from other areas of child and family development that are 
transferable to a Head Start setting. We are looking for ways to 
stimulate and support research that will have immediate as well as 
longer term impact on the program. We are looking at approaches for 
increasing Head Start efforts to involve parents in all aspects of the 
program. The program is also expanding the resources used by grantees 
and families to promote literacy and parenting education.

C. Program Purpose

    This announcement compiles in one document a description of the 
Head Start discretionary funds available in fiscal year 1995. This 
announcement indicates the range of activities necessary in keeping 
Head Start as the standard for excellence in early childhood and family 
support programs. The announcement includes research, demonstrations 
and the Fellows program for improving the quality of personnel in and 
around Head Start.

D. Statutory Authority
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number 93.600, 
Project Head Start. 42 U.S.C. 9801, et seq., The Head Start Act, as 
amended.

Part II. The Review Process and Evaluation Criteria

A. Eligible Applicants

    Various public or private non-profit organizations are eligible to 
apply. Specific requirements for each Priority Area are included in 
Part III.
    Before applications are reviewed, each application will be screened 
to determine that the applicant organization is an eligible applicant 
as specified under the selected priority area. Ineligible applicants 
will be notified at that time.
    Only agencies and organizations, not individuals, are eligible to 
apply. On all applications developed jointly by more than one agency or 
organization, the application must identify only one organization as 
the lead organization and the official applicant. The other 
organizations can be included as co-participants, subgrantees or 
subcontractors.

B. Review Process

    Applications received by the due date will be reviewed and scored 
competitively. Experts in the field, generally persons from outside the 
Federal government, will use the evaluation criteria listed in Section 
D of this part to review and score the applications. The results of 
this review 

[[Page 34261]]
are a primary factor in making funding decisions. ACYF may also solicit 
comments from ACF Regional Office staff and other Federal agencies. 
These comments, along with those of the expert reviewers, will be 
considered in making funding decisions.
    In selecting successful applicants, consideration may be given to 
achieving an equitable distribution of assistance among geographic 
regions of the country and to avoiding unnecessary duplication of 
effort.

C. Schedule for Awards

    ACYF intends to award new grants and cooperative agreements 
resulting from this announcement during the fourth quarter of fiscal 
year 1995.

D. Evaluation Criteria

1. Evaluation Criteria for Research Priority Areas

    The research priorities 1.01, 1.02, and 1.03 will be evaluated 
against the following criteria. Where some part of the criteria apply 
only to the Research Centers on Head Start Quality (RCHSQs) it has been 
noted.
a. Objectives and Understanding (15 points)
    The extent to which the application concisely states the specific 
objectives of the research and, (RCHSQs only) how each project will 
relate to the overall Consortium of RCHSQs.
    The extent to which the stated objectives reflect a knowledge of 
the literature, current theories, state-of-the-art methodologies and 
techniques, current Head Start research, policies and practices, and 
the extent to which the stated goals are achievable and realistic.
b. Background and Significance (15 points)
    The extent to which the application effectively discusses how the 
proposed research builds upon the current Head Start knowledge base and 
contributes to policy, practice, and future research efforts.
    The potential contribution of the research for improving Head Start 
practices or the quality of services for children and families with 
different characteristics and circumstances.
c. Approach (30 points)
    The extent to which the approach reflects a partnership between the 
applicant and the Head Start program.
    The extent to which the proposed methodology is appropriate to the 
questions under consideration.
    The extent to which the application addresses potential 
difficulties and presents adequate solutions.
    The quality of the project's conceptual framework, design and 
methodology. The appropriateness of the instruments for measuring key 
variables and the adequacy of their psychometric properties. The 
adequacy of the methods to minimize bias and threats to validity.
    The adequacy of plans to protect research participants.
    Adequacy of the plans for dissemination of research results.
d. Staff Background and Organizational Experience (30 points)
    The extent to which the qualifications of key staff are sufficient 
for the conduct of the research.
    The extent to which the application demonstrates the ability of the 
staff and organization to effectively and efficiently administer a 
project of the size, complexity and scope proposed.
    The extent to which the principal investigator (for 1.01), the 
supervising faculty advisor (for 1.02) or the research center director 
(for 1.03), demonstrate commitment by allocating reasonable time to 
this project.
    The extent to which key staff have experience in other 
collaborative efforts as (1) part of a consortium and/or (2) in 
partnership with Head Start or other community organizations.
    Evidence of support for this project from Head Start directors, 
staff and parents and other key civic leaders.
    (RCHSQs only) The extent to which the research team is inter-
disciplinary, reflecting the disciplines of importance to Head Start.
e. Budget Appropriateness and Reasonableness (10 Points)
    The appropriateness of the proposed approach in relation to the 
budget constraints, and reasonableness of the costs in relation to the 
conduct of the research and the products produced.

2. Evaluation Criteria for Demonstration Program Priorities and the 
Fellows Program

    Applications under Priority Areas 1.04, 1.05 and 1.06 will be 
evaluated against the following criteria.
a. Objectives and Need for Assistance (15 points)
    The extent to which the applicant identifies and documents any 
relevant economic, social, financial institutional or other problems 
requiring a solution; demonstrates the need for the assistance; and 
states the principal and subordinate objectives of the project. 
Supporting documentation or other testimonies from concerned interests 
other than the applicant on the need for assistance may be used.
b. Results or Benefits Expected (15 points)
    The extent to which the applicant identifies the specific and 
measurable results and benefits to be derived which are consistent with 
the objectives of the proposal and indicates the anticipated 
contributions to policy, practice, theory and/or research.
c. Approach (40 points)
    The extent to which the applicant outlines an acceptable plan of 
action pertaining to the scope of the project and details how the 
proposed work will be accomplished and lists each organization, 
consultant, and other key individuals who will work on the project. 
Describe in sufficient detail the evaluation methodology that will be 
used to determine and document if the needs identified and discussed 
are being met and if the results and benefits identified are being 
achieved.
d. Staff Background and Organization's Experience (20 Points)
    Identifies the background of the project director/principal 
investigator and key project staff (including name, address, training, 
most relevant educational background and other qualifying experiences 
along with resumes and a short description of their responsibilities or 
contribution to the applicant's work plan), the experience of the 
applicant in administering a project like the one proposed, and the 
applicant's ability to effectively and efficiently administer this 
project.
e. Budget Appropriateness and Reasonableness (10 Points)
    The extent to which the project's costs are reasonable in view of 
the activities to be carried out and the anticipated outcomes. In 
Priority Areas 1.05 and 1.06 where applicants are encouraged to provide 
in-kind contributions, the degree to which these in-kind contributions 
contribute to the budget appropriateness and reasonableness will be 
evaluated in this criteria. The extent to which assurances are provided 
that the applicant can and will provide in-kind contributions to the 
total project.

Part III. Priority Areas

    There are six priority areas in this program announcement, three in 
research areas, two demonstration priority areas, and one priority area 
for the establishment of the Head Start Fellows Program as follows:


[[Page 34262]]

1.01  Head Start/University Partnerships--Translating Research into 
Practice
1.02  Support for Graduate Students: The Head Start Research Scholars 
Program
1.03  Research Centers on Head Start Quality
1.04  Head Start Fellows Program
1.05  Head Start Emergent Literacy Project
1.06  Supporting Parent Roles in Children's Learning Environments

    For priority areas 1.01 and 1.02, we will be using the grant 
funding mechanism. For priority areas 1.03, 1.04, 1.05 and 1.06 we are 
seeking partners with whom we will enter into a cooperative agreement 
funding mechanism.
    A cooperative agreement is a funding mechanism which allows 
substantial Federal involvement in the activities undertaken with 
Federal financial support. Details of the responsibilities, 
relationships, and governance of the cooperative agreement will be 
spelled out in the terms and conditions of the award. The specific 
responsibilities of the Federal staff and project staff will be 
identified and agreed upon prior to the award of each cooperative.
A. Structure of Priority Area Descriptions

    Each priority area description is composed of the following 
sections:
     Eligible Applicants--This section specifies the type of 
organization which is eligible to apply under the particular priority 
area.
     Purpose--This section presents the basic focus and/or 
broad goal(s) of the priority area.
     Background Information--This section briefly discusses the 
legislative background and or the social context that supports the need 
for this particular priority area.
     Project Implementation--(Priority 1.03 only)
     Minimum Requirements for Project Design--This section 
presents the basic set of issues that must be addressed in the 
application. Typically, they relate to project design, evaluation and 
community involvement. This section also asks for specific information 
on the proposed project.
     Project Duration--This section specifies the maximum 
allowable length of time for the project period; it refers to the 
amount of time for which Federal funding is available
     Federal Share of Project Costs--This section specifies the 
maximum amount of Federal support for the project.
     Matching Requirement--This section specifies the minimum 
in-kind contributions. In-kind contributions are defined as the value 
of non-cash contributions provided by non-Federal third parties. Third 
party in-kind contributions may be made in the form of real property, 
equipment, supplies and other expendable property, and the value of 
goods and services directly benefiting and specifically identifiable to 
the project.
     Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded--This section 
specifies the number of projects that ACYF anticipates it will fund in 
the priority area.
     CFDA--This section identifies the Catalog of Federal 
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number and title of the program under which 
applications in this priority area will be funded.

B. Priority Areas

1.01  Head Start/University Partnerships--Translating Research Into 
Practice

    Eligible Applicants: Universities and four-year colleges.
    Purpose: To conduct research on practices that enhance children's 
cognitive or social-emotional development or support families to 
maximize their children's development. The products of this research 
should be of immediate usefulness to Head Start programs and other 
child and family development programs.
    Background Information: Because of its role as a national 
laboratory, Head Start has an interest in assisting in the development 
of best practices in child and family development which are based on 
scientifically sound research.
    Also, because of its recognition as a national, federally-sponsored 
program, and the access it provides to a multi-cultural, low-income 
population, Head Start has been a major source of research. This 
research, which has been conducted both with federal support and other 
resources, constitutes a significant portion of the child development 
research literature that includes low-income and multi-cultural 
populations.
    In the main, this ever-increasing body of literature contains 
studies that fall into the domains of basic research and evaluation. 
Although these studies have made a significant contribution to our 
scientific, policy and general program knowledge, very little has 
reached service providers in terms of implementable applications within 
the context of their programs. Therefore, with the increase in our 
knowledge base, there is a concomitant increase in the gap between 
research and its translation into practice.
    Within this priority area, ACYF is interested in funding projects 
that translate research into practice in partnership with the staff and 
families of Head Start programs. In addition to the translation of 
research into practice, these partnerships are intended to demonstrate 
new ways of conducting research where the researchers, the program 
staff and program families work as a cooperative research team.
    Projects under this priority area will: (1) Test approaches 
intended to enhance children's cognitive or social-emotional 
development or to support families toward maximizing their children's 
development, and (2) train program staff both in the direct use of the 
approach and in the training of other staff. These approaches may 
include those where the child, the family as the mediating influence of 
child outcomes, or both the primary caregivers and the child are 
targeted. The chosen approach should reflect theory and previous 
research. In particular, if a family support approach is selected, the 
theoretical links between the particular support mechanisms and maximum 
child development should be clearly delineated.
    In addition, the approach may be developed for appropriate use with 
either infants and toddlers or preschool children.
    Minimum Requirements for Project Design: In order to compete 
successfully under this priority area, the applicant must:
     Identify the area of cognitive development, social-
emotional development or family support to be enhanced by the 
particular approach that will be developed or modified.
     Place the proposed project in the context of previous 
research, theory or existing knowledge. A strong and convincing 
rationale for the need for the proposed project should be provided that 
is supported by research evidence and results from any relevant 
planning studies, pilot studies, or other preparatory work conducted by 
the applicant.
     Describe the research design which includes a research 
paradigm appropriate for the particular study; the way in which the 
program staff and parents will be incorporated as part of the research 
team for the design and conduct of the study; the measures that will be 
used to determine child and family outcomes on the particular 
attributes of cognitive development, social-emotional development or 
family support under study.
     Describe the approach that will be undertaken to implement 
the project's 

[[Page 34263]]
approach, if successful, as a permanent program feature including staff 
and parent training.
     Provide evidence of the key research staff's ability to 
conduct the project, including vitae and other appropriate 
documentation.
     Identify the Head Start program(s) with which the 
applicant institution would collaborate in the conduct of the research, 
and include letters indicating that the local Head Start program's 
Policy Council, staff and parents are willing to participate as part of 
the research team and how they would continue to use the approach in 
their program, if successful, after the grant expires.
     Describe the population served by the Head Start 
program(s) including relevant information such as size, ethnicity, 
income levels, percent of single parent families, and other relevant 
information.
     Provide assurances that the principal investigator or 
another appropriate staff member will attend one 2-3 day grantee 
meeting in Washington, DC each year in addition to Head Start's Third 
National Research Conference to be held on June 20-23, 1996.
     Provide all required assurances and certifications, 
including a Protection of Human Subjects Assurance as specified in the 
policy described on the HHS Form 596 (attached as appendix).
     Describe the report and/or other products that would be 
developed under the project, including the types of information that 
would be presented and the steps that would be undertaken to 
disseminate and promote the utilization of project products and 
findings.
     Since the project will be conducted at Head Start sites, 
the applicant should apply the university's indirect cost rate for off-
campus research.
    Project Duration: The length of the project must not exceed 36 
months.
    Federal Share of Project Costs: The maximum Federal share is not to 
exceed $150,000 for the first 12-month budget period or a maximum of 
$450,000 for a 3-year project period. The Federal share is inclusive of 
indirect costs.
    Matching Requirement: There is no matching requirement.
    Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is anticipated that 
4 projects will be funded.
    CFDA: 93.600 Head Start: Head Start Act, as amended

1.02  Support for Graduate Students: The Head Start Research Scholars 
Program

    Eligible Applicants: Institutions of higher education on behalf of 
qualified doctoral candidates enrolled in the sponsoring institution. 
To be eligible to administer the grant on behalf of the student, the 
institution must be fully accredited by one of the regional accrediting 
commissions recognized by the Department of Education and the Council 
on Post-Secondary Accreditation. In addition, the specific graduate 
student on whose behalf the application is made must be identified and 
any resultant grant award is not transferable to another student.
    Purpose: To provide support for graduate students to encourage the 
conduct of research with Head Start populations which will contribute 
to the knowledge base for improving services both for children and 
families in Head Start and for all low-income children and families.
    Background Information: A large body of literature exists on the 
early years of the Head Start program. A significant number of these 
studies are dissertations and other research conducted by graduate 
students. Many of these graduate students have continued to make 
significant contributions to Head Start as they have pursued their 
careers. As Head Start has continued to grow, its population has become 
more diverse and societal problems have become more complex, reflecting 
the changes in the larger low-income population. In order to meet 
today's challenges, Head Start and the child and family development 
field are increasingly in need of the information that only 
sophisticated research conducted by well trained researchers can 
provide. Therefore, as part of a research capacity building effort, 
Head Start is interested in supporting graduate students with diverse 
backgrounds and from diverse fields to conduct research in Head Start 
programs and, thus, contributing to the larger child and family 
development field.
    A new generation of Head Start research is needed that recognizes 
the great diversity among Head Start programs and the populations which 
it serves. Although Head Start delivers a core set of services which 
are defined by the Head Start Program Performance Standards, there is 
wide variability across programs in terms of the methods by which these 
services are delivered. Within programs, moreover, children and 
families vary in their levels of functioning, ethnicity and other 
variables which interact with program interventions. The Head Start 
population offers a unique opportunity for research which will 
contribute to understanding the differences in this diverse population 
and how to effectively tailor services and interventions for children 
and families with different characteristics.
    Research is needed on the particular learning styles, the cognitive 
and social development, and the developmental trajectories of children 
as well as on indicators of family functioning as they are manifested 
in specific cultural and/or linguistic groups, children with specific 
disabilities, and families at different levels of functioning. In 
addition, suitable measures of child, adult and family functioning must 
be identified and adapted for specific subgroups of this diverse 
population.
    ACYF is interested in supporting doctoral-level students, through 
their sponsoring institutions, who are now conducting or wish to 
conduct research using the Head Start population on issues affecting 
low-income children and families, and which will contribute to our 
knowledge about the best approaches for delivering services to diverse 
low-income populations. Doctoral-level graduate students who are 
representative of Head Start's diverse populations are particularly 
encouraged to apply.
    Research projects may include independent studies conducted by the 
graduate students or projects that graduate students carry out that are 
well-defined portions of a larger study currently being conducted by a 
principal investigator holding a faculty position.
    Minimum Requirements for Project Design: In order to compete 
successfully under this priority area, the applicant must:
     Propose one or more research questions which would 
contribute to the body of knowledge about Head Start children, families 
and programs which generalizes to the entire low-income population.
     Place the proposed project in the context of previous 
research or existing knowledge, and provide a strong and convincing 
rationale for the need for the proposed project or, if the proposed 
project is part of a larger study, identify the area which would be 
investigated under this priority area.
     Present specific results from any relevant planning 
studies, pilot studies, or other preparatory work conducted by the 
candidate.
     Describe the research design that would be employed 
including the research methods; sample selection; 

[[Page 34264]]
proposed measurement instruments, surveys, interviews, observation 
procedures or other data collection procedures; and proposed 
statistical analyses.
     Identify the Head Start program(s) in which the research 
would be conducted and describe the characteristics of the Head Start 
sample including relevant information such as size, ethnicity, income 
levels, family composition, and welfare status.
     Provide letters of commitment from the local Head Start 
program(s) assuring its participation in the plan for the study and its 
agreement to participate in the study including assurances that the 
project has been reviewed by staff and parents in the program and the 
Policy Council.
     Provide evidence of the candidate's ability to conduct the 
research including education, employment experiences, publications, and 
information on current academic status.
     Provide a letter from a faculty member providing 
assurances that he or she has read and approved the proposal and would 
serve as a mentor/advisor to the student throughout the life of the 
project.
     Provide assurances that the grant would be used to pay a 
stipend to the candidate; any appropriate university fees; and major 
project costs for conducting the proposed research, including any 
necessary travel.
     Provide all required assurances and certifications, 
including a Protection of Human Subjects Assurance as specified in the 
policy described on the HHS Form 596.
     Consider, because of the small amount of these awards, 
waiving any overhead or indirect costs.
     Provide assurances that the candidate would attend one 2-3 
day meeting of the Head Start Research Scholars in Washington, DC each 
project year in addition to Head Start's Third National Research 
Conference to be held in Washington, DC June 20-23, 1996.
     Describe the report and/or other products that would be 
developed under the project, including the types of information that 
would be presented and the steps that would be undertaken to 
disseminate and promote the utilization of project products and 
findings.
    Project Duration: The length of the project must not exceed 24 
months.
    Federal Share of Project Costs: The maximum Federal share is not to 
exceed $15,000 for the first 12-month budget period or a maximum of 
$30,000 for a 2-year project period.
    Matching Requirement: There is no matching requirement.
    Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is anticipated that 
10 projects will be funded. No individual university will be funded for 
more than one candidate.
    CFDA: 93.600 Head Start: Head Start Act, as amended

1.03  Research Centers on Head Start Quality (RCHSQs)

    Eligible Applicants: Institutions of higher education (a four-year 
college or university) or nonprofit research institutions that have 
formed a partnership with one or more Head Start grantee or delegate 
agency.
    Purpose: The Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF) 
is currently engaged in a process of reviewing and implementing 
policies which will create a 21st Century Head Start. A cornerstone of 
this effort is a focus on quality program practices: What they are, how 
they can be reliably assessed and monitored, and their relationship 
with program outcomes and performance measures. The Head Start Bureau 
plans to create ongoing partnerships with the academic community and 
Head Start grantees by supporting Research Centers on Head Start 
Quality (RCHSQs) using the cooperative agreement mechanism. The goals 
of the RCHSQ Consortium will be to:
    (1) Support the exploration of important research questions 
relating to quality program practices;
    (2) Identify existing measures and develop, test, and refine new 
measures of program quality and methods of assessing program quality, 
by:
     Reviewing and synthesizing the literature on program 
quality and performance measures from the broader early childhood and 
family support fields to develop a comprehensive set of quality 
indicators;
     Developing, refining, and piloting data collection for 
Head Start Program Performance Measures; and
     Developing, refining, and piloting approaches to the 
observation and measurement of quality practices in Head Start 
programs, including current Head Start monitoring practices and data 
collection procedures.
    (3) Develop ongoing databases and data analytic strategies useful 
for examining quality practices in Head Start programs, by:
     Working with Head Start grantees and ACYF Regional and 
Central Office staff to analyze existing program data, including 
monitoring and Management Information System data as well as data that 
individual programs or Regions may collect and data sets from other 
research and evaluation projects;
     Conducting observations of program practices, including 
participating in monitoring visits performed by ACYF staff;
     Gathering additional data, based both on ideas generated 
at the RCHSQs and proposals from ACYF; and
     Synthesizing and applying to the study of Head Start 
findings from relevant studies in the literature on quality early 
childhood program practices;
    (4) Explore linkages among program practices, program quality 
measures, program performance measures, and observable outcomes for 
children and families, by:
     Reviewing and synthesizing the literature on the 
association between program quality measures, performance measures, and 
child and family outcomes from the broader early childhood and family 
support fields to develop a comprehensive set of child and family 
outcome measures; and
     Developing, refining, and piloting approaches to the 
observation and measurement of child and family outcomes and their 
relationship to quality Head Start program practices.
    (5) Provide an ongoing mechanism for information dissemination 
about quality program practices and measures to the Head Start, early 
childhood, and family support communities.
    The RCHSQs will operate within the context of a multi-center 
Consortium, and each RCHSQ will form an intensive partnership with at 
least one Head Start program. Each Center will conduct research 
projects which include both site-specific studies which are unique to 
that RCHSQ and cross-cutting research projects that involve all of the 
RCHSQs in the Consortium. The development and piloting of quality 
indicators and measurement techniques by the RCHSQs will contribute to 
the assessment of Head Start program quality and performance across the 
nation and to generating a set of indicators that can be used locally 
and nationally for future studies of program quality.
    Background Information: Head Start has had a longstanding 
commitment to quality programming, both at the individual grantee 
level, where Performance Standards have been in place for 20 years, and 
at the national level, as evidenced by the National Head Start 
Association's quality initiative, which has established a benchmark for 
the provision of quality services to children and families from low 
socioeconomic status backgrounds. In the opening paragraph of the 
research 

[[Page 34265]]
section of their report, Creating a 21st Century Head Start (1994), the 
Advisory Committee on Head Start Quality and Expansion stated:

    Head Start is entering an historic period of reexamination, 
improvement in quality, and expansion of services. The size of the 
program, its comprehensive services, the diversity of the population 
it serves, and the fact that it is federally funded suggest a role 
for Head Start as a national laboratory for best practices in early 
childhood and family support services in low-income communities. 
Because Head Start needs to expand and renew itself in order to 
assume its role as a state-of-the-art `technology,' there is a 
concomitant and compelling need for a new, expanded, and formal role 
for Head Start research.

    The Head Start Act, as amended May 18, 1994, in section 649(d)(1), 
mandates Head Start to: (1) Permit ongoing assessment of the quality 
and effectiveness of programs; and, (2) contribute to developing 
knowledge concerning factors associated with the quality and 
effectiveness of Head Start programs and in identifying ways in which 
services provided may be improved. In response to the reauthorization 
legislation, the Head Start Bureau is engaged in the process of 
revising the Head Start Performance Standards and developing a set of 
Head Start Performance Measures. We anticipate that the RCHSQs will 
play an active role in examining the implementation of the revised 
Performance Standards and the new Performance Measures and their 
implications for Head Start program quality.
    In order for the Head Start program to fulfill its legislative 
mandate and to continue to ``strive for excellence'' in serving both 
children and families, research efforts must also lead the field in 
exploring new methodologies and strategies for the conduct of research 
on quality practices. Program monitoring data collected through the On-
Site Program Review Instrument (OSPRI) are available which quantify the 
areas in which programs are in compliance with the current set of Head 
Start Performance Standards. However, many more analyses of these data 
and additional information is needed to plan program improvements and 
to inform policymakers about the key program quality elements that are 
associated with positive outcomes for children and families. 
Information is needed at the local and national levels which examines 
the best ways to provide quality services in all domains--education, 
health, parent partnerships and involvement, social services and 
disabilities. The Head Start Program Performance Standards, both as 
currently implemented and when revised, can serve as a useful tool to 
the research community to help understand and assess the indicators of 
quality at the local level. Additionally, the ways programs interpret 
these Standards to meet the needs of a diverse population under various 
conditions can also provide a rich source of data regarding how to 
define and implement comprehensive child development and family support 
programs.
    There are additional sources of program quality indicators, 
including measures of best practices for child care, classroom and 
family support services. In some cases there are established empirical 
links between these best practices and child or family outcomes which 
cut across the early childhood and/or family support fields; this body 
of research can inform and be informed by research on Head Start 
quality through a dialogue between Head Start and the broader early 
childhood and family support fields. In addition, the National Head 
Start Association and the National Association for the Education of 
Young Children have developed criteria for certifying high quality 
programs. Head Start now has the opportunity and mandate to draw 
together the early childhood and family support literature with 
multiple Head Start indices to provide a new and comprehensive picture 
of the dynamics of quality services and to provide leadership through 
its role as a national laboratory.
    Quality program practices will be identified by the RCHSQs using a 
variety of nomination procedures, including program monitoring, peer 
nominations, direct observation and other approaches. The RCHSQ staff 
will visit a wide range of Head Start programs both during independent 
site visits and as part of monitoring site visits conducted by the ACF 
Regional Offices. In partnership with Head Start programs, the RCHSQs 
will pilot test different innovative, but convergent, methods for 
collecting information on the Head Start Performance Measures (e.g., 
classroom observations, child assessments, parent interviews, etc.) and 
select corresponding child, parent and community outcome measures in 
order to examine the association between quality program practices, 
performance measures and positive outcomes.
    Throughout the work of the RCHSQs, a special emphasis will be 
placed on the dissemination of findings and assessment measures to the 
Head Start community. Publications written for program personnel and/or 
videos will be produced throughout the five year Consortium period 
which focus on quality program practices and their assessment. These 
publications/videos will be produced in partnership with the Training 
and Technical Assistance Branch of the Head Start Bureau and will be 
disseminated by ACYF.
    Project Implementation: Each applicant for a RCHSQ will be required 
to propose a research workplan which will be negotiated between the 
applicant and ACYF and updated on a yearly basis. The workplan proposed 
by the applicant will include both projects unique to that applicant's 
RCHSQ and research projects that involve all of the RCHSQs in the 
Consortium. Applicants must clearly identify in their proposals both 
site-specific research projects and preliminary cross-cutting, 
collaborative projects which would be negotiated by the RCHSQ 
Consortium and ACYF and implemented by the entire RCHSQ Consortium. The 
site-specific portion of the proposed research workplan will be subject 
to approval by ACYF, but will not be reviewed by the other Centers. The 
cross-cutting portion of each Center's proposed workplan and the 
research needs of the Head Start Bureau will be reviewed by the 
Consortium and ACYF before the final cross-cutting research plan is 
approved by ACYF and is implemented by the Consortium. Each Center's 
proposed budget must allocate approximately 50 percent of its funds to 
site-specific and cross-cutting projects, respectively. The final 
allocation of Center funds to each type of project for a given year 
will be determined after the research workplans for each RCHSQ's site-
specific projects have been approved by ACYF and the workplan for 
cross-cutting projects has been negotiated by the Consortium and ACYF 
and approved by ACYF.
    A Steering Committee will be formed which consists of all RCHSQ 
Center Directors as well as representatives from the Head Start Bureau 
and the Research, Demonstration, and Evaluation Branch of ACYF. The 
ACYF Federal Project Officer will serve as the chairperson for the 
Steering Committee. The Steering Committee will advise ACYF on the 
design, implementation and management of the cross-cutting research 
projects which are implemented by all RCHSQs in the Consortium; it will 
also provide a forum for the discussion of issues raised by the 
Consortium members and ACYF. A contracting firm funded separately by 
ACYF will provide logistical support for the RCHSQ Consortium and 
Steering Committee meetings, provide logistical support for outside 
consultants, and perform the other tasks required to 

[[Page 34266]]
support the infrastructure of the RCHSQ Consortium.
    Minimum Requirements for Project Design: This is a five-year 
cooperative agreement project in which substantial Federal involvement 
is anticipated. The specific respective responsibilities of Federal 
staff and the awardee will be negotiated prior to the cooperative 
agreement award. In order to successfully compete for an award under 
this announcement, each RCHSQ applicant must describe an overall 
research and organizational plan for the requested period of support as 
outlined below:

1. Research Plan

    Each RCHSQ applicant must propose a research workplan which 
outlines a cohesive and parsimonious set of innovative theory-driven 
site-specific and cross-cutting research questions which address the 
five goals of the RCHSQs. For example, the fourth goal of the RCHSQs is 
to ``explore linkages among program practices, program quality 
measures, program performance measures, and observable outcomes for 
children and families''. Examples of several research questions 
addressing this goal might be: What are the relationships among 
established quality indicators, program performance measures, and child 
and family outcomes, in each Head Start component area? Which measures 
of quality are associated with which performance measures and outcomes? 
Are there synergistic effects of program quality? Are there aspects of 
program quality that cut across component areas?
    These illustrative research questions could be addressed within the 
site-specific workplan, with quality indicators and outcome measures 
unique to that Center, and/or within the cross-cutting workplan, with 
standardized measures of quality and outcomes proposed for use across 
RCHSQs to examine if the outcomes are the same for different Head Start 
programs serving children and families from a variety of backgrounds 
and circumstances. Within its proposal, each applicant is expected to 
propose a list of research questions for both its site-specific 
research projects and those that may be addressed by the Consortium as 
a whole. Given the preliminary nature of the proposed cross-cutting 
research projects, it is expected that the final cross-cutting workplan 
for the Consortium will be developed based upon the input received from 
the members of the Steering Committee and participating Head Start 
programs before it is submitted for final approval by ACYF.
    Applicants should justify the selected site-specific and cross-
cutting research questions proposed in their application on the basis 
of the significance of the Head Start quality issues to be addressed, 
the current state of scientific knowledge, the feasibility of doing 
research in the designated area(s) (e.g. the availability of 
measurement instruments, populations to study, etc.), the applicant's 
experience conducting research in the proposed areas of investigation, 
and the potential impact of the research on the improvement of Head 
Start services for children and their families from diverse backgrounds 
and circumstances.
    For each proposed site-specific and cross-cutting study, the 
applicant should include a brief review and synthesis of the relevant 
literature and existing scientific knowledge (including their current 
work in that area); the objectives and significance of the proposed 
research; research design parameters; proposed study samples; and the 
timetable for project implementation.
    Research workplans for all Research Centers on Head Start Quality 
must adhere to the following:
    a. All applicants must describe the experience of their proposed 
research staff in conducting collaborative research efforts with Head 
Start or other community service organizations which serve children and 
families from low socioeconomic status backgrounds. These descriptions 
of previous collaborative research efforts should highlight the 
studies' methodologies, including the research designs, description and 
sizes of samples, main data collection instruments and strategies, 
statistical analyses employed, and major findings and publications.
    b. All applicants must provide Curriculum Vitae, a statement of 
relevant current and pending research, training, and service grant and 
contract support, as well as a letter of commitment, for all relevant 
Center and Head Start personnel as an appendix.
    c. All applicants must provide a listing of the percentage of time 
that all relevant RCHSQ and Head Start personnel would devote to 
specific Center-related research duties as an appendix.
    d. All applicants must describe the characteristics of the 
community in which participating Head Start programs are located as 
well as the characteristics of the currently enrolled Head Start 
population.

2. Organizational Plan

    Each Head Start RCHSQ applicant must outline an overall 
organizational plan which describes its proposed administrative 
organization, including its relationship to the participating Head 
Start grantees. Relationships with other entities (e.g., the local 
School Board, State Public Health and Mental Health systems) should 
also be described. The applicant must submit (as an appendix to the 
application) a letter of agreement signed by the responsible officer of 
each associated organization (including all participating Head Start 
grantees and other members of the research planning team), stating that 
cooperation, services, or other relevant assistance would be available 
on a continuing basis and at what level such support would be 
available. Appropriate clearances from each host institution must be 
submitted which state that the proposed research meets that 
institution's research review requirements (e.g., Institutional Review 
Board responsible for activities involving human subjects as provided 
for under Department of Health and Human Services policy (45 CFR part 
46, 42 U.S.C. 289)).
    Organizational plans for all Head Start RCHSQ applications must 
adhere to the following:
    a. The Principal Investigator must serve as Director of the Head 
Start RCHSQ and provide scientific leadership by devoting a significant 
portion of his/her time to the Center, including time spent on RCHSQ 
research projects. The Center Director must be responsible for the 
planning, coordination, and efficient operation of the Center program, 
the preparation of its budget, and the control of expenditures, staff 
appointments, and space allocation. Another individual may be assigned 
responsibility for the day-to-day administration of the Center.
    b. Head Start RCHSQs should be multidisciplinary in nature, and 
include investigators from such disciplines as education, psychology, 
psychiatry, pediatrics, social work, nursing, epidemiology, statistics, 
economics, sociology, and public health.
    c. Applicants must describe how the research planning team would be 
assembled, including the specific roles which Head Start staff and 
parents as well as community leaders would play in the planning and 
formal approval of all research projects.
    d. The applicant must identify any federally funded demonstration 
projects in which the affiliated Head Start grantees are participating 
(e.g., the Comprehensive Child Development Program (CCDP), the Head 
Start/Public School Transition Demonstration).
    e. The applicant must provide assurances that the Head Start RCHSQ 
Director would serve as a member of the 

[[Page 34267]]
RCHSQ Steering Committee, and would attend quarterly Steering Committee 
meetings in Washington, DC.
    f. The applicant must provide assurances that, at a minimum, the 
Head Start RCHSQ Center Director and one Head Start Program 
representative would attend annual RCHSQ Consortium meetings in 
Washington, DC, including Head Start's Third National Research 
Conference to be held on June 20-23, 1996.
    g. All applicants must describe an overall budget which includes 
costs for both site-specific and cross-cutting research projects. The 
proposed budget of each Center must allocate approximately 50 percent 
of its funds to site-specific and cross-cutting projects, respectively. 
The final allocation of Center funds to each type of project for a 
given year will be determined after the research workplans for each 
RCHSQ's site-specific projects and the workplan for cross-cutting 
projects have been approved by ACYF.
    Project Duration: The length of the project must not exceed 60 
months.
    Federal Share of Project Costs: The maximum Federal share is not to 
exceed $400,000 for the first 12-month budget period or a maximum of 
$500,000 per year for the remaining four years of the project period. 
The Federal share is inclusive of indirect costs.
    Research Centers on Head Start Quality costs may include the 
salaries of core personnel (e.g., the Center Director), research 
expenses, and research resources shared across Center projects such as 
statistical consultation, data storage and analysis, and equipment; 
local and national travel associated with Head Start research projects; 
or any other items directly associated with the cost of conducting the 
Head Start research efforts under this announcement which are allowable 
under the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-21 (which 
applies to cooperative agreements with institutions of higher 
education) and A-122 (which applies to cooperative agreements with 
nonprofit organizations). In recent revisions to OMB circular A-110 
equipment has been defined as tangible, non-expendable personal 
property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition 
cost of $5,000 or more per unit.
    Head Start RCHSQ funds may not be used to support training 
activities other than those directly related to the conduct of specific 
research projects. Funds to support training for student research 
assistants or Head Start staff should be sought from alternative Head 
Start or other training or fellowship programs.
    Head Start grantees which receive contracts from individual RCHSQs 
as partnership participants must use these funds solely for the support 
and conduct of research activities. Funds received for participation in 
the partnership may be used to pay Head Start staff for any additional 
work or responsibility that is assumed as a result of this research; 
local and national travel associated with Head Start RCHSQ research 
projects; or any other items associated with the cost of the conduct of 
Head Start RCHSQ research efforts.
    Matching Requirement: There is no matching requirement.
    Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is anticipated that 
up to four Research Centers on Head Start Quality will be funded in 
fiscal year 1995.
    CFDA: 93.600 Head Start: Head Start Act, as amended.

1.04  Head Start Fellows Program

    Eligible Applicants: Universities and Colleges, Foundations, 
Professional and Non-Profit Agencies and Organizations.
    Purpose: The purpose of this priority area is to provide support, 
through a cooperative agreement, to a partner who will work 
cooperatively with the Head Start Bureau to design and implement the 
National Head Start Fellows Program as envisioned in the Head Start 
Reauthorization of 1994. The primary purpose of the Fellows Program is 
to support the growth and development of individuals who can make 
special contributions to the Head Start and early childhood development 
communities. Therefore, we are seeking applications from organizations 
with experience and stature in these fields.
    Background Information: The Human Services Amendments of 1994 added 
section 648A(d) to the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9843A) authorizing the 
Secretary to create a Head Start Fellows program and to publish 
regulations. (A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the program will be 
published in the near future. This Section closely follows one of the 
recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Head Start Quality and 
Expansion. As part of an overall initiative to improve the quality and 
excellence of local programs, the Advisory Committee proposed several 
strategies for training and career development for program staff 
working within Head Start and other early childhood programs. The 
Advisory Committee suggested that the Department of Health and Human 
Services should develop a ``fellows program to build outstanding 
leadership in Head Start and other early childhood programs and to 
provide opportunities for promising staff from the field to work in 
national professional organizations, and HHS regional and central 
offices.'' The Advisory Committee also said that this initiative 
``should include the foundation and corporate community as well as 
leading colleges and universities.'' Both the Advisory Committee and 
the Head Start Reauthorizing legislation envisioned that this Fellows 
Program would be part of a long-term quality improvement initiative 
aimed at upgrading the skills and experience of promising individuals 
within local programs as well as a strategy for creating a new cadre of 
leaders who can influence and bring about improvements in policy and 
practice at a variety of levels in order to positively affect the lives 
and circumstances of low-income children and their families across the 
country.
    Our intention is to support the design and implementation of this 
program whose dual goals are: (1) Providing a unique career-building 
and learning opportunity to mid-career individuals with outstanding 
leadership potential in Head Start, early childhood development and 
family support; and (2) enhancing the quality of Head Start and other 
early childhood development and family support programs as a result of 
individuals who have had this experience. Overall, this is an exciting 
and unique opportunity to expose staff from the field to a variety of 
leadership building developmental activities, issues, and experiences 
through placements in offices of the Administration for Children and 
Families, including the Head Start Bureau in Washington DC. and the ten 
ACF regional offices throughout the country. Placements may also occur 
in academia and other organizations concerned with children and family 
service issues. Also important is the opportunity for Federal staff to 
work with and learn from the valuable experience of practitioners in 
the field, thereby enriching national policy-making for years to come. 
The partner in the cooperative agreement should be an organization 
well-recognized for its work in staff development and training in the 
field of early childhood development.
    One of the goals of the Fellows program is to attract and serve the 
needs of a diverse pool of experienced candidates who have different 
levels of educational and different program backgrounds. We anticipate 
that the Fellows program will attract Head Start directors, component 
coordinators and key staff, and researchers in the field of 

[[Page 34268]]
child development and family support. Selection, placement, and support 
of the Fellows must be managed carefully to tailor experiences to the 
interests and developmental needs of the Fellow. In addition, the 
opportunity for creating a climate of support among the Fellows 
themselves is something that should be carefully crafted and built 
upon.
    The development of the Fellows program would require an initial 
planning period in order to create the kind of high quality, 
prestigious program that will achieve its goals and attract the caliber 
of individuals desired. We envision that the first group of Fellows 
would be selected and placed by the summer of 1996. We anticipate that 
approximately 10-15 Fellows would be involved in the program each year 
with the first year's placements being primarily to the Head Start 
Bureau in Washington D.C. and to the regional offices of the 
Administration for Children and Families.
    Collaborative activities would include, among other things:
     Conceptualization of the Fellows program and development 
of the an overall project plan for implementation;
     Training and curriculum design;
     Development of policies and procedures to govern the Head 
Start Fellows program;
     Establishment of recruitment strategies, screening/
selection criteria;
     Management of the application and rating processes and 
recommendations for selection of individual Fellows;
     Development and implementation of the plan for placement 
of Fellows;
     Design and conduct of an orientation program and other 
group learning and supportive activities for the Head Start Fellows;
     Development of policies and procedures regarding the 
Program; and
     Periodic review of the Head Start Fellows program to 
ensure that it is achieving the results intended in the Head Start Act.
    Minimum Requirements for Program Design: The project under this 
priority area will be funded as a cooperative agreement in which 
substantial Federal participation is anticipated. The partner will be 
expected to work closely with Federal staff. The specific 
responsibilities of the Federal Staff and the awardee will be 
negotiated prior to award of the cooperative agreement. In order to 
successfully compete under this priority area, the applicant must:
     Describe its understanding of the goals and purposes for 
the Fellows program and its relationship to developing leadership 
potential for the individuals in the field and for improving the 
quality of local Head Start and other early childhood programs;
     Describe the mission of their organization as it relates 
to leadership development within the early childhood and family support 
fields and how this project fits within that mission;
     Describe the approach and strategies that would be taken 
to design the program, to recruit potential participants, to support 
the implementation and maintenance of the Fellows program, and to 
evaluate the program's effectiveness;
     Describe its experience in training and curriculum design 
and delivery which relates to programs of the kind envisioned in this 
announcement;
     Provide letters from individuals and organizations 
indicating their clear commitment to participate in the project. If the 
proposed training design requires the technical assistance of other 
colleges, universities, or nonprofit agencies, the proposal should 
include letters of commitment assuring their willingness to participate 
and indicating the roles they would play in the project.
     Provide a staffing plan and vitae for key staff and 
assurances that the Project Director or another appropriate staff 
member will attend six meetings annually in Washington, DC. to meet 
with staff to discuss issues related to Fellows program implementation.
     Provide a budget which delineates the project 
administration costs versus those expenses which will directly support 
the Fellows individually and as a group. The budget should include 
stipends to Fellows. The stipend should be tiered to accommodate a 
range of education and experience and would parallel the Federal GS 12-
14 range. Stipends should include funds to support fringe benefits. The 
average stipend and total amount of the $1 million of the budget which 
will be used for stipends for the Fellows should be delineated. It is 
anticipated that the major portion of the budget would be used for 
stipends and direct costs of the Fellows. The other expenses to support 
participation of the Fellows should also be described and budgeted 
within the $1 million.
    Project Duration: The length of the project must not exceed 60 
months.
    Federal Share of Project Costs: The maximum Federal share is not to 
exceed $1,000,000 for the first 12-month budget period and $1,000,000 
for each succeeding 12-month period.
    Matching Requirements: No non-Federal match is required.
    Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is anticipated that 
one project will be funded.
    CFDA: 93.600 Head Start: Head Start Act as amended.

1.05  Head Start Emergent Literacy Project

    Eligible Applicants: Applicants must be private or public nonprofit 
organizations.
    Purpose:  The purpose of this priority area is to provide support, 
through a cooperative agreement(s), to one or two partners who will 
work cooperatively with the Head Start Bureau in designing and 
implementing strategies and approaches designed to support and 
strengthen the emergent literacy activities carried out by Head Start 
grantees. For the purpose of this announcement, emergent literacy 
refers to activities that are conducted with young children during the 
period when they are beginning to become aware of print, to observe and 
experiment with reading and writing, and to understand the relationship 
between the written and spoken word.
    The cooperative agreement(s) that are awarded should be designed to 
demonstrate methods for assisting Head Start grantees in reaching 
higher levels of excellence in preparing children to read through the 
provision of training to staff and parents in how to more effectively 
provide emergent learning activities to children in both the classroom 
and at home.
    Background Information:  As a national program providing 
comprehensive developmental services primarily to low-income children 
and their families, Head Start has undertaken a number of efforts 
designed to promote literacy among the children and families it serves. 
Head Start links families with community institutions which operate 
literacy programs including libraries, local education agencies which 
offer adult basic education, G.E.D. and adult vocational training 
programs, and local literacy volunteer programs.
    Additionally, grantees have played a key role in the family 
literacy movement in three basic ways: (1) Increasing Head Start 
families' access to materials, activities and services which are 
essential to family literacy development (e.g., acquiring children's 
books for the home, helping families obtain and use library cards, and 
promoting family participation in story hours for young children at 
neighborhood centers); (2) supporting parents in the role of being 
their child's first teacher by providing encouragement and direction to 
Head Start families in the provision of activities which will stimulate 
and sustain their children's interest and potential for future 
independent success 

[[Page 34269]]
in literacy activities; and (3) assisting parents as adult learners to 
recognize and address their own literacy needs by creating environments 
which are positive, supportive and offer the promise of benefiting both 
them and their children.
    Head Start has also supported several specific literacy initiatives 
designed to assist local Head Start programs in developing multi-
faceted literacy programs.
    In 1989, special demonstration grants were competitively awarded to 
six Head Start grantees to address the issue of family literacy. 
Building on these grants, beginning in 1992, sixty-five Family Service 
Centers (FSCs) have been funded. One of three major components of these 
FSCs has been a family literacy component. Early findings show that 
Head Start grantees with FSCs have twice the rate of adult 
participation in GED classes as do grantees with no FSC programs.
    Since 1991, $9 million a year has been provided to local Head Start 
programs to support local literacy activities. All grantees have 
received a portion of these funds, which support parents' participation 
in community literacy programs.
    In 1992 the Head Start/Library of Congress Interagency Agreement 
was developed to demonstrate in communities nationwide how libraries 
which serve young children can plan and work with Head Start grantees 
to enhance both learning and parent involvement in children's literacy 
and language development.
    Head Start also has collaborated with Even Start since its 
inception, specifically with its adult literacy program. Additionally, 
the Head Start Bureau has developed a number of publications and 
materials for its grantees on recommended practices and resources 
designed to help programs develop and/or improve their family literacy 
programs.
    Head Start programs have also implemented a wide variety of 
activities to encourage the emergent literacy of the children served. 
These activities have included:
     Integrating books into daily curriculum activities and 
various learning centers;
     Creating an appropriate environment for quiet reading;
     Displaying books in an attractive manner;
     Providing books that are culturally and developmentally 
appropriate;
     Making and using reading enhancements such as puppets and 
flannel boards;
     Encouraging parents to read to their children and provide 
family literacy activities as needed;
     Training parents and staff to select books for Head Start 
children;
     Increasing the storytelling skills of staff and parents; 
and
     Encouraging staff and parents to become reading models for 
children.
    While some Head Start programs operate well-developed and multi-
faceted emergent literacy programs, other grantees offer programs that 
focus on only one or a few aspects of emergent literacy. Therefore, in 
order to improve the quality of the services being provided by Head 
Start nationwide, strategies are needed which range from the provision 
of information to all grantees (e.g., general mailings on the 
implementation of emergent literacy programs and/or on effective 
emergent literacy activities) to the provision of intensive support and 
training to programs in need of such assistance.
    Minimum Requirements for Project Design: The project(s) under this 
priority area will be funded as a cooperative agreement(s) in which 
substantial Federal participation is anticipated. The grantee(s) will 
be expected to work closely with Federal staff in both the national 
Head Start Bureau and in the various Regional Offices, including the 
American Indian Programs and the Migrant Programs Branches in 
implementing the project(s). The specific responsibilities of Federal 
staff and the awardee(s) will be negotiated prior to the award of the 
cooperative agreement(s). In order to successfully compete under this 
priority area, the applicant must:
     Describe how the project would benefit both the national 
Head Start program and the local Head Start program and its community, 
and discuss any relevant research.
     Describe the strategies and approaches that would be 
designed and tested in terms of their effectiveness in supporting 
grantees to move toward higher levels of quality and excellence in the 
area of emergent literacy, including the different levels of service 
that would be required and how grantees would be selected for each 
level of service. Specify what approach would be used for supporting 
grantees who are at various levels of quality.
     Describe how emergent literacy programs would be designed 
for or could be adapted for use in Head Start programs based in a 
variety of settings including center-based, home-based, and combination 
programs as well as programs that are part-day and full-day.
     Describe how multicultural issues would be addressed.
     Describe how all Head Start grantees would be supported in 
reaching higher levels of quality and excellence including the 
training, technical assistance and dissemination strategies that would 
be developed and tested.
     Describe the qualifications of key staff and how their 
experience is relevant to this project. Vitae for all key staff should 
be provided.
    Program Duration: The length of the project must not exceed 17 
months.
    Federal Share of the Project: The maximum Federal funding for the 
project is not to exceed $1,000,000. Applicants are encouraged to 
provide in-kind contributions to the total project.
    Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is anticipated that 
up to two projects will be funded.
    CFDA: 93.600 Head Start: Head Start Act, as amended.
1.06  Supporting Parent Roles in Children's Learning Environments

    Eligible Applicants: Applicants must be public or private nonprofit 
organizations.
    Purpose: The purpose of this priority area is to provide support, 
through a cooperative agreement(s), to one or more partners who will 
work cooperatively with the Head Start Bureau in designing and 
implementing approaches for helping Head Start parents to become more 
actively involved in their children's learning through the educational 
use of television, the visual arts and the media.
    Background: In today's world, children are exposed to an enormous 
amount of stimuli, whether the children are in their communities or 
neighborhoods, or in their own homes, or in the larger world brought to 
them by television. Television is readily available in nearly every 
household, and is often turned on for many hours in the day. Children 
may watch intently or passively, seeing the visual images on the 
television as they pass by. Parents can help children interpret and use 
the environment created by television in ways that are appropriate for 
the child's age and developmental level. Parents are challenged to 
understand more about child growth and development; the powerful 
effects television has on a child; how to discern what they can and 
should control in this environment of television; and how to make 
appropriate use of this environment in their role as the primary 
educators of their child and the persons who have a major role in 
shaping their child's values, goals and aspirations. It is important 
for parents to know how to use the environment of 

[[Page 34270]]
television as a set of learning opportunities that contribute to the 
child's positive growth and development. In order to effectively assist 
parents in using television, the visual arts and the media as positive 
learning opportunities for their pre-school age children, resources and 
materials need to be developed and/or adapted that will help parents:
     Increase their understanding and knowledge of child growth 
and development in order to gain a better understanding of 
developmentally appropriate uses of television and media for the 
preschool age child;
     Use television and the media to strengthen and reinforce 
their child's learning;
     Engage in constructive learning opportunities with their 
children when choosing age-appropriate television programming;
     Utilize television and other visual arts and the media in 
age and content appropriate, interactive ways;
     Become more discerning consumers when their children are 
exposed to everyday events/activities.
    Minimum Requirements for Project Design: The project(s) under this 
priority area will be funded as a cooperative agreement(s) in which 
substantial Federal participation is anticipated. The grantee(s) will 
be expected to work closely with Federal staff in both the national 
Head Start Bureau and in the various Regional Offices, including the 
American Indian Programs and the Migrant Programs Branches, in 
implementing the project(s). The specific responsibilities of Federal 
staff and the awardee(s) will be negotiated prior to the award of the 
cooperative agreement(s). In order to successfully compete under this 
priority area, the applicant must:
     Describe what approaches, strategies and materials would 
be developed and/or adapted from existing resources to specifically 
address the needs of Head Start parents and their young children. A 
description of how both the multicultural and diverse language issues 
that are present in most Head Start communities would be addressed 
should also be discussed.
     Describe how pilot tests of these resources and materials 
would be conducted in selected Head Start sites, including how the 
participating grantees and families would be selected and the role 
which staff of the local Head Start programs would play in the 
implementation of these local pilot tests.
     Describe how, based upon these pilot tests, modifications 
in the approaches, strategies and materials used would be identified 
and the necessary modifications made.
     Vitae for all key staff should be provided.
    Program Duration: The length of the project should not exceed 17 
months.
    Federal Share of the Project: The maximum Federal funding for the 
project is not to exceed $1,000,000. Applicants are encouraged to 
provide in-kind contributions to the project.
    Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is anticipated that 
one or two projects will be funded.
    CFDA: 93.600 Head Start: Head Start Act, as amended.

Part IV. Instructions for Submitting Applications

A. Availability of Forms
    Eligible applicants interested in applying for funds must submit a 
complete application including the required forms included at the end 
of this program announcement Appendix A.
    In order to be considered for a grant under this announcement, an 
application must be submitted on the Standard Form 424 (approved by the 
Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0348-0043). A copy 
has been provided. Each application must be signed by an individual 
authorized to act for the applicant and to assume responsibility for 
the obligations imposed by the terms and conditions of the grant award.
    Applicants requesting financial assistance for non-construction 
projects must file the Standard Form 424B, ``Assurances: Non-
Construction Programs.'' Applicants must sign and return the Standard 
Form 424B with their application. Applicants must provide a 
certification concerning lobbying. Prior to receiving an award in 
excess of $100,000, applicants shall furnish an executed copy of the 
lobbying certification. Applicants must sign and return the 
certification with their application.
    Applicants must make the appropriate certification of their 
compliance with the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988. By signing and 
submitting the application, applicants are providing the certification 
and need not mail back the certification with the application.
    Applicants must make the appropriate certification that they are 
not presently debarred, suspended or otherwise ineligible for award. By 
signing and submitting the application, applicants are providing the 
certification and need not mail back the certification with the 
application.
    Applicants must also understand that they will be held accountable 
for the smoking prohibition included within P.L. 103-227, The Pro-
Children's Act of 1994. A copy of the Federal Register notice which 
implements the smoking prohibition is included with the forms. By 
signing and submitting the application, applicants are providing the 
certification and need not mail back the certification with the 
application.

B. Application Submission

    Applicants submitting proposals should use the following format 
guidelines: Proposals should be organized according to the evaluation 
criteria located in Part II of Federal Register announcement. For each 
of the five specified criteria, applicants should provide information 
in response to the requirements required by the priority area 
descriptions contained in Part III of this announcement.
    One signed original and two copies of the grant applications, 
including all attachments, are required.

C. Checklist for a Complete Application

    The checklist below is for your use to ensure that the application 
package has been properly prepared.
--One original, signed and dated application plus two copies.
--Attachments/Appendices, when included, should be used only to provide 
supporting documentation such as administration charts, positions 
descriptions, resumes, and letters of agreement/support. Please do not 
include books or video tapes and they are not easily reproduced and are 
therefore inaccessible to reviewers.
--A complete application consists of the following items in this order:

    (1) Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424, REV. 4-88);
    (2) Table of Contents;
    (3) Budget information-Non-Construction Programs (SF424A&B REV.4-
88);
    (4) Budget Justification, including subcontract agency budgets;
    (5) Project Summary (not to exceed one page);
     (6) Application Narrative and Appendices;
    (7) Proof of non-profit status. Any non-profit organization 
submitting an application must submit proof of its non-profit status in 
its application at the time of submission. The non-profit organization 
can accomplish this by providing a copy of the applicant's listing in 
the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) most recent list of tax-exempt 
organizations described in Section 501(c)(3) of the IRS code or by 
providing a copy of the currently valid IRS tax exemption certificate, 
or by providing a 

[[Page 34271]]
copy of the articles of incorporation bearing the seal of incorporation 
of the State in which the corporation or association is domiciled.
    (8) Assurances Non-Construction Programs;
    (9) Certification Regarding Lobbying;
    (10) Where appropriate, a completed SPOC certification with the 
date of SPOC contact entered in line 16, page 1 of the SF 424, REV.4-
88.

D. Due Date for the Receipt of Applications
    1. Deadlines: Applications shall be considered as meeting an 
announced deadline if they are either:
    a. Received on or before the deadline date at the receipt point 
specified in this program announcement, or
    b. Sent on or before the deadline date and received by ACF in time 
for the independent review. Applicants are cautioned to request a 
legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark or to obtain a legibly dated 
receipt from a commercial carrier or U.S. Postal Service. Private 
metered postmarks shall not be acceptable as proof of timely mailing.
    2. Late applications: Applications which do not meet the criteria 
above are considered late applications. ACF shall notify each late 
applicant that its application will not be considered in the current 
competition.
    3. Extension of deadlines: ACF may extend the deadline for all 
applicants because of acts of God such as floods, hurricanes, etc., or 
when there is a widespread disruption of the mails. However, if ACF 
does not extend the deadline for all applicants, it may not waive or 
extend the deadline for any applicants.

E. Required Notification of the State Single Point of Contact

    This program is covered under Executive Order 12372, 
``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,'' and 45 CFR part 100, 
``Intergovernmental Review of Department of Health and Human Services 
Program and Activities.'' Under the Order, States may design their own 
processes for reviewing and commenting on proposed Federal assistance 
under covered programs.
    * All States and Territories except Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, 
Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, 
Nebraska, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, 
Virginia, Washington, American Samoa and Palau have elected to 
participate in the Executive Order process and have established Single 
Points of Contact (SPOCs). Applicants from these nineteen jurisdictions 
need take no action regarding E.O. 12372. Applicants for projects to be 
administered by Federally-recognized Indian Tribes are also exempt from 
the requirements of E.O. 12372. Otherwise, applicants should contact 
their SPOCs as soon as possible to alert them of the prospective 
applications and receive any necessary instructions. Applicants must 
submit any required material to the SPOCs as soon as possible so that 
the program office can obtain and review SPOC comments as part of the 
award process. It is imperative that the applicant submit all required 
materials, if any, to the SPOC and indicate the date of this submittal 
(or the date of contact if no submittal is required) on the Standard 
Form 424, item 16a.
    Under 45 CFR 100.8(a)(2), a SPOC has 60 days from the application 
deadline to comment on proposed new or competing continuation awards. A 
waiver has been sought to allow comments from the SPOC by September 20, 
1995.
    SPOCs are encouraged to eliminate the submission of routine 
endorsements as official recommendations.
    Additionally, SPOCs are requested to clearly differentiate between 
mere advisory comments and those official State process recommendations 
which may trigger the ``accommodate or explain'' rule.
    When comments are submitted directly to ACF, they should be 
addressed to: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration 
for Children and Families, Division of Discretionary Grants, 370 
L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447.
    A list of the Single Points of Contact for each State and Territory 
is included as an Appendix to this announcement.

E. Closing Date

    The closing date for submission of applications is August 16, 1995 
as specified in the Dates section at the beginning of this 
announcement.

    Dated: June 23, 1995.
Olivia A. Golden,
Commissioner, Administration on Children Youth and Families.

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P

[[Page 34272]]

      

    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN30JN95.063
    
BILLING CODE 4184-01-C

[[Page 34273]]


Instructions for the SF 424

    This is a standard form used by applicants as a required 
facesheet for preapplications and applications submitted for Federal 
assistance. It will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant 
certification that States which have established a review and 
comment procedure in response to Executive Order 12372 and have 
selected the program to be included in their process, have been 
given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission.

Item and Entry

    1. Self-explanatory.
    2. Date application submitted to Federal agency (or State if 
applicable) & applicant's control number (if applicable).
    3. State use only (if applicable).
    4. If this application is to continue or revise an existing 
award, enter present Federal identifier number. If for a new 
project, leave blank.
    5. Legal name of applicant, name of primary organizational unit 
which will undertake the assistance activity, complete address of 
the applicant, and name and telephone number of the person to 
contact on matters related to this application.
    6. Enter Employer Identification Number (EIN) as assigned by the 
Internal Revenue Service.
    7. Enter the appropriate letter in the space provided.
    8. Check appropriate box and enter appropriate letter(s) in the 
space(s) provided:

--``New'' means a new assistance award.
--``Continuation'' means an extension for an additional funding/
budget period for a project with a projected completion date.
--``Revision'' means any change in the Federal Government's 
financial obligation or contingent liability from an existing 
obligation.

    9. Name of Federal agency from which assistance is being 
requested with this application.
    10. Use the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and 
title of the program under which assistance is requested.
    11. Enter a brief descriptive title of the project, if more than 
one program is involved, you should append an explanation on a 
separate sheet. If appropriate (e.g., construction or real property 
projects), attach a map showing project location. For 
preapplications, use a separate sheet to provide a summary 
description of this project.
    12. List only the largest political entities affected (e.g., 
State, counties, cities).
    13. Self-explanatory.
    14. List the applicant's Congressional District and any 
District(s) affected by the program or project.
    15. Amount requested or to be contributed during the first 
funding/budget period by each contributor. Value of in-kind 
contributions should be included on appropriate lines as applicable. 
If the action will result in a dollar change to an existing award, 
indicate only the amount of the change. For decreases, enclose the 
amounts in parentheses. If both basic and supplemental amounts are 
included, show breakdown on an attached sheet. For multiple program 
funding, use totals and show breakdown using same categories as item 
15.
    16. Applicants should contact the State Single Point of Contact 
(SPOC) for Federal Executive Order 12372 to determine whether the 
application is subject to the State intergovernmental review 
process.
    17. This question applies to the applicant organization, not the 
person who signs as the authorized representative. Categories of 
debt include delinquent audit disallowances, loans and taxes.
    18. To be signed by the authorized representative of the 
applicant. A copy of the governing body's authorization for you to 
sign this application as official representative must be on file in 
the applicant's office. (Certain Federal agencies may require that 
this authorization be submitted as part of the application.)

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P

[[Page 34274]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN30JN95.064



[[Page 34275]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN30JN95.065


BILLING CODE 4184-01-C

[[Page 34276]]


Instructions for the SF-424A

General Instructions

    This form is designed so that application can be made for funds 
from one or more grant programs. In preparing the budget, adhere to 
any existing Federal grantor agency guidelines which prescribe how 
and whether budgeted amounts should be separately shown for 
different functions or activities within the program. For some 
programs, grantor agencies may require budgets to be separately 
shown by function or activity. For other programs, grantor agencies 
may require a breakdown by function or activity. Sections A, B, C, 
and D should include budget estimates for the whole project except 
when applying for assistance which requires Federal authorization in 
annual or other funding period increments. In the latter case, 
Sections A, B, C, and D should provide the budget for the first 
budget period (usually a year) and Section E should present the need 
for Federal assistance in the subsequent budget periods. All 
applications should contain a breakdown by the object class 
categories shown in Lines a-k of Section B.

Section A. Budget Summary

    Lines 1-4, Columns (a) and (b)--For applications pertaining to a 
single Federal grant program (Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog 
number) and not requiring a functional or activity breakdown, enter 
on Line 1 under Column (a) the catalog program title and the catalog 
number in Column (b).
    For applications pertaining to a single program requiring budget 
amounts by multiple functions or activities, enter the name of each 
activity or function on each line in Column (a), and enter the 
catalog number in Column (b). For applications pertaining to 
multiple programs where none of the programs require a breakdown by 
function or activity, enter the catalog program title on each line 
in Column (a) and the respective catalog number on each line in 
Column (b).
    For applications pertaining to multiple programs where one or 
more programs require a breakdown by function or activity, prepare a 
separate sheet for each program requiring the breakdown. Additional 
sheets should be used when one form does not provide adequate space 
for all breakdown of data required. However, when more than one 
sheet is used, the first page should provide the summary totals by 
programs.
    Columns (c) through (g.)--For new applications, leave Columns 
(c) and (d) blank. For each line entry in Columns (a) and (b), enter 
in Columns (e), (f), and (g) the appropriate amounts of funds needed 
to support the project for the first funding period (usually a 
year).
    For continuing grant program applications, submit these forms 
before the end of each funding period as required by the grantor 
agency. Enter in Columns (c) and (d) the estimated amounts of funds 
which will remain unobligated at the end of the grant funding period 
only if the Federal grantor agency instructions provide for this. 
Otherwise, leave these columns blank. Enter in columns (e) and (f) 
the amounts of funds needed for the upcoming period. The amount(s) 
in Column (g) should be the sum of amounts in Columns (e) and (f).
    For supplemental grants and changes to existing grants, do not 
use Columns (c) and (d). Enter in Column (e) the amount of the 
increase or decrease of Federal funds and enter in Column (f) the 
amount of increase or decrease of non-Federal funds. In Column (g) 
enter the new total budgeted amount (Federal and non-Federal) which 
includes the total previous authorized budgeted amounts plus or 
minus, as appropriate, the amounts shown in Columns (e) and (f). The 
amount(s) in Column (g) should not equal the sum of amounts in 
Columns (e) and (f).
    Lines 5--Show the totals for all columns used.

Section B. Budget Categories

    In the column headings (1) through (4), enter the titles of the 
same programs, functions, and activities shown on Lines 1-4, Column 
(a), Section A. When additional sheets are prepared for Section A, 
provide similar column headings on each sheet. For each program, 
function or activity, fill in the total requirements for funds (both 
Federal and non-Federal) by object class categories.
    Lines 6a-i--Show the totals of Lines 6a to 6h in each column.
    Line 6j--Show the amount of indirect cost.

[[Page 34277]]

    Line 6k--Enter the total of amounts on Lines 6i and 6j. For all 
applications for new grants and continuation grants the total amount 
in column (5), Line 6k, should be the same as the total amount shown 
in Section A, Column (g), Line 5. For supplemental grants and 
changes to grants, the total amount of the increase or decrease as 
shown in Columns (1)-(4), Line 6k should be the same as the sum of 
the amounts in Section A, Columns (e) and (f) on Line 5.
    Line 7--Enter the estimated amount of income, if any, expected 
to be generated from this project. Do not add or subtract this 
amount from the total project amount. Show under the program 
narrative statement the nature and source of income. The estimated 
amount of program income may be considered by the federal grantor 
agency in determining the total amount of the grant.

Section C. Non-Federal-Resources

    Lines 8-11--Enter amounts of non-Federal resources that will be 
used on the grant. If in-kind contributions are included, provide a 
brief explanation on a separate sheet.
    Column (a)--Enter the program titles identical to Column (a), 
Section A. A breakdown by function or activity is not necessary.
    Column (b)--Enter the contribution to be made by the applicant.
    Column (c)--Enter the amount of the State's cash and in-kind 
contribution if the applicant is not a State or State agency. 
Applicants which are a State or State agencies should leave this 
column blank.
    Column (d)--Enter the amount of cash and in-kind contributions 
to be made from all other sources.
    Column (e)--Enter totals of Columns (b), (c), and (d).
    Line 12--Enter the total for each of Columns(b)-(e). The amount 
in Column (e) should be equal to the amount on Line 5, Column (f), 
Section A.

Section D. Forecasted Cash Needs

    Line 13--Enter the amount of cash needed by quarter from the 
grantor agency during the first year.
    Line 14--Enter the amount of cash from all other sources needed 
by quarter during the first year.
    Line 15--Enter the totals of amounts on Lines 13 and 14.

Section E. Budget Estimates of Federal Funds Needed for Balance of the 
Project

    Lines 16-19--Enter in Column (a) the same grant program titles 
shown in Column (a), Section A. A breakdown by function or activity 
is not necessary. For new applications and continuation grant 
applications, enter in the proper columns amounts of Federal funds 
which will be needed to complete the program or project over the 
succeeding funding periods (usually in years). This section need not 
be completed for revisions (amendments, changes, or supplements) to 
funds for the current year of existing grants.
    If more than four lines are needed to list the program titles, 
submit additional schedules as necessary.
    Line 20--Enter the total for each of the Columns (b)-(e). When 
additional schedules are prepared for this Section, annotate 
accordingly and show the overall totals on this line.

Section F. Other Budget Information

    Line 21--Use this space to explain amounts for individual direct 
object-class cost categories that may appear to be out of the 
ordinary or to explain the details as required by the Federal 
grantor agency.
    Line 22--Ener the type of indirect rate (provisional, 
predetermined, final or fixed) that will be in effect during the 
funding period, the estimated amount of the base to which the rate 
is applied, and the total indirect expense.
    Line 23--Provide any other explanations or comments deemed 
necessary.
Assurances--Non-Construction programs

    Note: Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your 
project or program. If you have questions, please contact the 
awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may 
require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is 
the case, you will be notified.

    As the duly authorized representative of the applicant I certify 
that the applicant:
    1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance, and 
the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including 
funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project costs) to 
ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project 
described in this application.
    2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the 
United States, and if appropriate, the State, through any authorized 
representative, access to and the right to examine all records, 
books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish 
a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted 
accounting standards or agency directives.
    3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using 
their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the 
appearance of personal or organization conflict of interest, or 
personal gain.
    4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable 
time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency.
    5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. Secs. 4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for 
merit systems for programs funded under one of the nineteen statutes 
or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a 
Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F).

[[Page 34278]]

    6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to 
nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title 
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits 
discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) 
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 
Secs. 1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on 
the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 
as amended (29 U.S.C. Sec. 794), which prohibits discrimination on 
the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. Secs. 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination 
on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 
1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the 
basis of drug abuse; (f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 
(P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the 
basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) Secs. 523 and 527 of the 
Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. 290 dd-3 and 290 ee-3), 
as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse 
patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 
U.S.C. Sec. 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination 
in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other 
nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which 
application for Federal assistance is being made; and (j) the 
requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may 
apply to the application.
    7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements 
of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 
property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which 
provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or 
whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally 
assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real 
property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal 
participation in purchases.
    8. Will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 
Secs. 1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities 
of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in 
whole or in part with Federal funds.
    9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis-
Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. Secs. 276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 
U.S.C. Sec. 276c and 18 U.S.C. Secs. 874), and the Contract Work 
Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. Secs. 327-333), regarding 
labor standards for federally assisted construction subagreements.
    10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase 
requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act 
of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood 
hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood 
insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and 
acquisition is $10,000 or more.
    11. Will comply with environmental standards which may be 
prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of 
environmental quality control measures under the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order 
(EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 
11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) 
evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 
11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State 
management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act 
of 1972 (16 U.S.C. Secs. 1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of Federal 
actions to State (Clear Air) Implementation Plans under Section 
176(c) of the Clear Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sec. 7401 
et seq.); (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water 
under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, (P.L. 93-
523); and (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, as amended, (P.L. 93-205).
    12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 
U.S.C. Secs. 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or 
potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system.
    13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with 
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 470), EO 11593 (identification and protection of 
historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic 
Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 469a-1 et seq.).
    14. Will comply with P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of 
human subjects involved in research, development, and related 
activities supported by this award of assistance.
    15. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 
(P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) pertaining to the 
care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held for 
research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of 
assistance.
    16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention 
Act (42 U.S.C. Secs. 4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead 
based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence 
structures.
    17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and 
compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984.
    18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other 
Federal laws, executive orders, regulations and policies governing 
this program.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL

----------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE

----------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION

----------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE SUBMITTED

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P

[[Page 34279]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN30JN95.066



[[Page 34280]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN30JN95.067



BILLING CODE 4184-01-C

[[Page 34281]]


Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other 
Responsibility Matters--Primary Covered Transactions

    By signing and submitting this proposal, the applicant, defined 
as the primary participant in accordance with 45 CFR part 76, 
certifies to the best of its knowledge and believe that it and its 
principals:
    (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for 
debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered 
transactions by any Federal Department or agency;
    (b) Have not within a 3-year period preceding this proposal been 
convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for 
commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with 
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, 
State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; 
violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of 
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction 
of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
    (c) Are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or 
civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) 
with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph 
(1)(b) of this certification; and
    (d) Have not within a 3-year period preceding this application/
proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or 
local) terminated for cause or default.
    The inability of a person to provide the certification required 
above will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this 
covered transaction. If necessary, the prospective participant shall 
submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification. 
The certification or explanation will be considered in connection 
with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determination 
whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the 
prospective primary participant to furnish a certification or an 
explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this 
transaction.
    The prospective primary participant agrees that by submitting 
this proposal, it will include the clause entitled ``Certification 
Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary 
Exclusion--Lower Tier Covered Transaction,'' provided below without 
modification in all lower tier covered transactions and in all 
solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.

Certification Regarding Lobbying

Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative 
Agreements

    The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge 
and belief, that:
    (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be 
paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for 
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any 
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or 
an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding 
of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making 
of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, 
and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification 
of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
    (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been 
paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to 
influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of 
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a 
Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, 
loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and 
submit Standard Form-LLL, ``Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,'' in 
accordance with its instructions.
    (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this 
certification be included in the award documents for all subawards 
at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under 
grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all 
subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
    This certification is a material representation of fact upon 
which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered 
into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making 
or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, 
U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification 
shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not 
more than $100,000 for each such failure.
State for Loan Guarantee and Loan Insurance

    The undersigned states, to the best of his or her knowledge and 
belief, that:
    If any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for 
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any 
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or 
an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this 
commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a 
loan, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL 
``Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,'' in accordance with its 
instructions.
    Submission of this statement is a prerequisite for making or 
entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, 
U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required statement shall 
be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more 
than $100,000 for each such failure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Organization

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P

[[Page 34282]]
[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN30JN95.068



BILLING CODE 4184-01-C

[[Page 34283]]


EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372--STATE SINGLE POINTS OF CONTACT

Arizona--Mrs. Janice Dunn, ATTN: Arizona State Clearinghouse, 3800 
N. Central Avenue, 14th Floor, Phoenix, Arizona 85012, Telephone 
(602) 280-1315
Arkansas--Tracie L. Copeland, Manager, State Clearinghouse, Office 
of Intergovernmental Services, Department of Finance and 
Administration, PO Box 3278, Little Rock, Arkansas 72203, Telephone 
(501) 682-1074
California--Glenn Stober, Grants Coordinator, Office of Planning and 
Research, 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, California 95814, Telephone 
(916) 323-7480
Delaware--Ms. Francine Booth, State Single Point of Contact, 
Executive Department, Thomas Collins Building, Dover, Delaware 
19903, Telephone (302) 736-3326
District of Columbia--Rodney T. Hallman, State Single Point of 
Contact, Office of Grants Management and Development, 717 14th 
Street, NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005, Telephone (202) 727-
6551
Florida--Florida State Clearinghouse, Intergovernmental Affairs 
Policy Unit, Executive Office of the Governor, Office of Planning 
and Budgeting, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001, 
Telephone (904) 488-8441
Georgia--Mr. Charles H. Badger, Administrator, Georgia State 
Clearinghouse, 254 Washington Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30334, 
Telephone (404) 656-3855
Illinois--Steve Klokkenga, State Single Point of Contact, Office of 
the Governor, 107 Stratton Building, Springfield, Illinois 62706, 
Telephone (217) 782-1671
Indiana--Jean S. Blackwell, Budget Director, State Budget Agency, 
212 State House, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, Telephone (317) 232-
5610
Iowa--Mr. Steven R. McCann, Division of Community Progress, Iowa 
Department of Economic Development, 200 East Grand Avenue, Des 
Moines, Iowa 50309, Telephone (515) 281-3725
Kentucky--Ronald W. Cook, Office of the Governor, Department of 
Local Government, 1024 Capitol Center Drive, Frankfort, Kentucky 
40601, Telephone (502) 564-2382
Maine--Ms. Joyce Benson, State Planning Office, State House Station 
#38, Augusta, Maine 04333, Telephone (207) 289-3261
Maryland--Ms. Mary Abrams, Chief, Maryland State Clearinghouse, 
Department of State Planning, 301 West Preston Street, Baltimore, 
Maryland 21201-2365, Telephone (301) 225-4490
Massachusetts--Karen Arone, State Clearinghouse, Executive Office of 
Communities and Development, 100 Cambridge Street, Room 1803, 
Boston, Massachusetts 02202, Telephone (617) 727-7001
Michigan--Richard S. Pastula, Director, Michigan Department of 
Commerce, Lansing, Michigan 48909, Telephone (517) 373-7356
Mississippi--Ms. Cathy Mallette, Clearinghouse Officer, Office of 
Federal Grant Management and Reporting, 301 West Pearl Street, 
Jackson, Mississippi 39203, Telephone (601) 960-2174
Missouri--Ms. Lois Pohl, Federal Assistance Clearinghouse, Office of 
Administration, P.O. Box 809, Room 430, Truman Building, Jefferson, 
City, Missouri 65102, Telephone (314) 751-4834
Nevada--Department of Administration, State Clearinghouse, Capitol 
Complex, Carson City, Nevada, 89710, Telephone (702) 687-4065, 
Attention: Ron Sparks, Clearinghouse Coordinator
New Hampshire--Mr. Jeffrey H. Taylor, Director, New Hampshire Office 
of State Planning, Attn: Intergovernmental Review Process/James E. 
Bieber, 2\1/2\ Beacon Street, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, 
Telephone (603) 271-2155
New Jersey--Gregory W. Adkins, Acting Director, Division of 
Community Resources, N.J. Department of Community Affairs, Trenton, 
New Jersey 08625-0803, Telephone (609) 292-6613

    Please direct correspondence and questions to: Andrew J. 
Jaskolka, State Review Process, Division of Community Resources, CN 
814, Room 609, Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0803, Telephone (609) 292-
9025.

New Mexico--George Elliott, Deputy Director, State Budget Division, 
Room 190, Bataan Memorial Building, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503, 
Telephone (505) 827-3640 FAX (505) 827-3006
New York--New York State Clearinghouse, Division of the Budget, 
State Capitol, Albany, New York 12224, Telephone (518) 474-1605
North Carolina--Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director, Office of the 
Secretary of Administration N.C. State Clearinghouse, 116 W. Jones 
Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003, Telephone (919) 733-7232
North Dakota--N.D. Single Point of Contact, Office of 
Intergovernmental Assistance, Office of Management and Budget, 600 
East Boulevard Avenue, Bismarck, North Dakota 58505-0170, Telephone 
(701) 224-2094
Ohio--Larry Weaver, State Single Point of Contact, State/Federal 
Funds Coordinator, State Clearinghouse, Office of Budget and 
Management, 30 East Broad Street, 34th Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43266-
0411, Telephone (614) 466-0698
Rhode Island--Mr. Daniel W. Varin, Associate Director, Statewide 
Planning Program, Department of Administration, Division of 
Planning, 265 Melrose Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02907, 
Telephone (401) 277-2656

    Please direct correspondence and questions to: Review 
Coordinator, Office of Strategic Planning.
South Carolina--Omeagia Burgess, State Single Point of Contact, 
Grant Services, Office of the Governor, 1205 Pendleton Street, Room 
477, Columbia, South Carolina 29201, Telephone (803) 734-0494
Tennessee--Mr. Charles Brown, State Single Point of Contact, State 
Planning Office, 500 Charlotte Avenue, 309 John Sevier Building, 
Nashville, Tennessee 37219, Telephone (615) 741-1676
Texas--Mr. Thomas Adams, Governor's Office of Budget and Planning, 
P.O. Box 12428, Austin, Texas 78711, Telephone (512) 463-1778
Utah--Utah State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Budget, ATTN: 
Carolyn Wright, Room 116 State Capitol, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114, 
Telephone (801) 538-1535
Vermont--Mr. Bernard D. Johnson, Assistant Director, Office of 
Policy Research & Coordination, Pavilion Office Building, 109 State 
Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05602, Telephone (802) 828-3326
West Virginia--Mr. Fred Cutlip, Director, Community Development 
Division, West Virginia Development Office, Building #6, Room 553, 
Charleston, West Virginia 25305, Telephone (304) 348-4010
Wisconsin--Mr. William C. Carey, Federal/State Relations, Wisconsin 
Department of Administration, 101 South Webster Street, P.O. Box 
7864, Madison, Wisconsin 53707, Telephone (608) 266-0267
Wyoming--Sheryl Jeffries, State Single Point of Contact, Herschler 
Building, 4th floor, East Wing, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002, Telephone 
(307) 777-7574
Guam--Mr. Michael J. Reidy, Director, Bureau of Budget and 
Management Research, Office of the Governor, PO Box 2950, Agana, 
Guam 96910, Telephone (617) 472-2285
Northern Mariana Islands--State Single Point of Contact, Planning 
and Budget Office, Office of the Governor, Saipan, CM, Northern 
Mariana Islands 96950
Puerto Rico--Norma Burgos/Jose H. Caro, Chairman/Director, Puerto 
Rico Planning Board, Minillas Government Center, PO Box 41119, San 
Juan, Puerto Rico 00940-9985, Telephone (809) 727-4444
Virgin Islands--Jose L. George, Director, Office of Management and 
Budget, #41 Norregade Emancipation Garden Station, Second Floor, 
Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802

    Please direct correspondence to: Linda Clarke, Telephone (809) 
774-0750.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE

    Public Law 103-227, Part C--Environmental Tobacco Smoke, also 
known as the Pro-Children Act of 1994 (Act), requires that smoking 
not be permitted in any portion of any indoor facility owned or 
leased or contracted for by an entity and used routinely or 
regularly for the provision of health, day care, education, or 
library services to children under the age of 18, if the services 
are funded by Federal programs either directly or through State or 
local governments, by Federal grant, contract, loan, or loan 
guarantee. The law does not apply to children's services provided in 
private residences, facilities funded solely by Medicare or Medicaid 
funds, and portions of facilities used for inpatient drug or alcohol 
treatment. Failure to comply with the 

[[Page 34284]]
provisions of the law may result in the imposition of a civil monetary 
penalty of up to $1000 per day and/or the imposition of an 
administrative compliance order on the responsible entity.
    By signing and submitting this application the applicant/grantee 
certifies that it will comply with the requirements of the Act. The 
applicant/grantee further agrees that it will require the language 
of this certification be included in any subawards which contain 
provisions for children's services and that all subgrantees shall 
certify accordingly.

[FR Doc. 95-16174 Filed 6-29-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P