[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33191-33193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-15628]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL95-55-000, et al.]


Plains Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc., et 
al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

June 20, 1995
    Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
Commission:

1. Plains Electric Generation and ) Transmission Cooperative, Inc. ) v. 
Public Service Company of New Mexico

[Docket No. EL95-55-000]

    Take notice that on June 13, 1995, Plains Electric Generation and 
Transmission Cooperative, Inc. (Plains) filed a complaint under Section 
206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e, alleging that the 
rates currently being charged by Public Service Company of New Mexico 
(PNM) for firm, point-to-point transmission service under Service 
Schedule G to the PNM-Plains Master Interconnection Agreement and the 
Agreement for Electric Service between PNM and Plains are unjust, 
unreasonable or otherwise unlawful. Plains further requests that the 
Commission institute an investigation and hearing into the justness and 
reasonableness of rates charged under Service Schedule G and the 
Agreement for Electric Service, determine just and reasonable rates and 
establish a refund effective date not later than sixty days after the 
filing of Plains' complaint.
    PNM's currently effective rates at issue in Plains' complaint were 
accepted for filing as to Service Schedule G in Docket No. ER87-360-000 
on July 6, 1987 (as extended in Docket No. ER95-329-000, accepted for 
filing on February 27, 1995), and as to the Agreement for Electric 
Service in Docket No. ER91-644-000 on October 18, 1991. Plains 
estimates that PNM's maximum just and reasonable rate for firm, point-
to-point transmission service under the referenced agreements should be 
approximately 45 percent less than PNM's currently effective rates. 
Based largely on data taken from PNM's Form 1 report for 1994, Plains 
has performed an initial transmission rate analysis using the levelized 
fixed charge rate methodology, and claims that the maximum just and 
reasonable rates for firm, point-to-point transmission service under 
the referenced agreements should not exceed $1.34 per Kw-month.
    Comment date: July 20, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

2. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER95-1070-000]

    Take notice that Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (Niagara Mohawk) 
on June 16, 1995, tendered for filing an amendment to an agreement 
between Niagara Mohawk and Rainbow Energy Marketing Corp. (Rainbow) 
dated May 18, 1995 providing for certain transmission services to 
Rainbow. [[Page 33192]] 
    Copies of this filing were served upon Rainbow and the New York 
State Public Service Commission.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

3. Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation

[Docket No. ER95-1185-000]

    Take notice that on June 8, 1995, Central Hudson Gas and Electric 
Corporation (CHG&E), tendered for filing a Service Agreement between 
CHG&E and New England Power Company. The terms and conditions of 
service under this Agreement are made pursuant to CHG&E's FERC Electric 
Rate Schedule, Original Volume 1 (Power Sales Tariff) accepted by the 
Commission in Docket No. ER94-1662. CHG&E also has requested waiver of 
the 60-day notice provision pursuant to 18 CFR 35.11.
    A copy of this filing has been served on the Public Service 
Commission of the State of New York.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

4. San Diego Gas & Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95-1193-000]

    Take notice that on June 9, 1995, San Diego Gas & Electric Company 
(SDG&E), tendered for filing and acceptance, pursuant to 18 CFR 35.12, 
an Interchange Agreement (Agreement) between SDG&E and InterCoast Power 
Marketing Company (IPM).
    SDG&E requests that the Commission allow the Agreement to become 
effective on August 14, 1995, or at the earliest possible date.
    Copies of this filing were served upon the Public Utilities 
Commission of the State of California and IPM.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

5. Jamaica Energy Partners

Docket No. EG95-57-000

    On June 14, 1995, Jamaica Energy Partners, c/o Wartsila Diesel 
Development Corp., Inc., 201 Defense Highway, Suite 100, Annapolis, 
Maryland 21401 (Applicant), filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission an application for determination of exempt wholesale 
generator status pursuant to Part 365 of the Commission's Regulations 
(the Application).
    Applicant will own an approximately 76 MW floating diesel-engine-
powered electric generating facility located in Old Harbour Bay, 
Jamaica. The Facility's electricity will be sold exclusively at 
wholesale, with the possible exception of some retail sales in Jamaica. 
None of the electric energy generated by the Facility will be sold to 
consumers in the United States.
    Comment date: July 14, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice. The Commission will limit its 
consideration of comments to those that concern the adequacy or 
accuracy of the application.

6. Concord Electric Company

[Docket No. ER94-692-003]

    Take notice that on June 9, 1995, Concord Electric Company tendered 
for filing its refund report in the above-referenced docket.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

7. Montaup Electric Company

[Docket No. ER94-1062-002]

    Take notice that on May 30, 1995, Montaup Electric Company tendered 
for filing its refund report in the above-referenced docket.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

8. UtiliCorp United Inc., Aquila Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER95-203-003] and ER95-216-003 (Not Consolidated)

    Take notice that on June 16, 1995, UtiliCorp United Inc. 
(``UtiliCorp'') tendered for filing a Network Integration Service 
tariff for its West Virginia Power division in compliance with the 
Commission's May 18, 1995 order in these proceedings.
    A copy of the filing was served on each party to these proceedings 
and the Public Service Commission of the State of West Virginia.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

9. Delmarva Power & Light Company

[Docket No. ER95-222-001]

    Take notice that on June 15, 1995, Delmarva Power & Light Company 
(Delmarva) made its compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's 
order issued May 17, 1995. Delmarva's filing includes the following:
    A. Sample formula calculations;
    B. Revised tariff sheets which include the rates for ancillary 
services; a rate of return on equity with cost support; and revised 
provisions substituting ``or'' pricing for ``and'' pricing; and
    C. Cost support for the ancillary rates.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

10. American Electric Power Service Corporation

[Docket No. ER95-497-000]

    Take notice that on June 16, 1995, the American Electric Power 
Service Corporation (AEPSC) amended its filing in the above referenced 
Docket to modify the method by which AEPSC will determine the cost of 
emission allowances and including provisions where AEPSC may require a 
purchasing company to declare, at the beginning of a transaction, 
whether they will pay in cash or return allowances in-kind.
    A copy of the filing was served upon the parties affected by the 
amendment and the affected state regulatory commissions.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

11. Kentucky Utilities Service

[Docket No. ER95-595-000]

    Take notice that Northeast Utilities Service Company, (NUSCO) filed 
on behalf of Kentucky Utilities on June 16, 1995, a Service Agreement 
to provide non-firm transmission service to Rainbow Energy Marketing 
Corporation (Rainbow) under the NU System Companies' Transmission 
Service Tariff No. 2.
    NUSCO states that a copy of this filing has been mailed to Rainbow.
    NUSCO requests that the Service Agreement become effective sixty 
(60) days after receipt of this filing by the Commission.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

12. Connecticut Valley Electric Company, Central Vermont Public 
Service Corporation

Docket Nos. ER95-679-000 and No. ER95-680-000

    Take notice that on June 14, 1995, Connecticut Valley Electric 
Company and Central Vermont Public Service Corporation tendered for 
filing an amendment to its filing in response to the Commission's April 
28, 1995, deficiency letter.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.
13. Louisville Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95-928-000]

    Take notice that on June 15, 1995, Louisville Gas and Electric 
Company [[Page 33193]] tendered for filing an amendment to its April 
19, 1995 filing in the above-referenced docket.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

14. Louisville Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95-997-000]

    Take notice that on June 15, 1995, Louisville Gas and Electric 
Company tendered for filing an amendment to its May 1, 1995 filing in 
the above-referenced docket.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

15. American Electric Power Service Corporation

[Docket No. ER95-1121-000]

    Take notice that on June 14, 1995, the American Electric Power 
Service Corporation (AEPSC) amended its filing in the above referenced 
docket to (1) comply with the Commission's order directing revisions to 
recovery of costs for emission allowances and (2) submit to the 
Commission, Service Schedule A--AEP Transmission Service, which was 
inadvertently omitted from the initial filing.
    A copy of the filing was served upon the parties affected by the 
amendment and the affected state regulatory commissions.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

16. Central Illinois Public Service Company

[Docket No. ER95-1187-000]

    Take notice that on June 8, 1995, Central Illinois Public Service 
Company (CIPS), submitted a Service Agreement, dated May 30, 1995, 
establishing Madison Gas and Electric Company as a customer under the 
terms of CIPS' Coordination Sales Tariff CST-1 (CST-1 Tariff).
    CIPS requests an effective date of May 30, 1995 for the service 
agreement, and, accordingly, seeks waiver of the Commission's notice 
requirements. Copies of this filing were served upon Madison Gas and 
Electric Company and the Illinois Commerce Commission.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

17. Louisville Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95-1191-000]

    Take notice that on May 22, 1995, Louisville Gas and Electric 
Company tendered for filing a copy of a service agreement between 
Louisville Gas and Electric Company and ENRON Power Marketing, Inc., 
under Rate GSS.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

18. Louisville Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95-1192-000]

    Take notice that on June 9, 1995, Louisville Gas and Electric 
Company, tendered for filing a copy of a service agreement between 
Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Enron Power Marketing, Inc. 
under Rate GSS.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

19. Crockett Cogeneration, a California Limited Partnership

[Docket No. QF84-429-003]

    On June 14, 1995, Crockett Cogeneration, A California Limited 
Partnership, tendered for filing an amendment to its filing in this 
docket. No determination has been made that the submittal constitutes a 
complete filing.
    The amendment provides additional information pertaining to the 
ownership and technical characteristics of the facility.
    Comment date: July 11, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

20. Air Products Hycal Company, L.P.

[Docket No. QF95-260-000]

    On June 16, 1995, Air Products Hycal Company, L.P., (Air Products) 
tendered for filing an amendment to its filing in this docket.
    The amendment pertains to information relating to the technical 
aspects of Air Products' cogeneration facility. No determination has 
been made that the submittal constitutes a complete filing.
    Comment date: July 10, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

21. Indiana Michigan Power Company

[Docket No. ER95-1164-000]

    Take notice that on June 6, 1995, American Electric Power Service 
Corporation (AEPSC), tendered for filing a service agreement for 
transmission service to be made available to Indiana Municipal Power 
Agency pursuant to AEPSC FERC Electric Tariff Original Volume No. 1. 
Waiver of Notice requirements was requested to accommodate an effective 
date of June 1, 1995.
    A copy of the filing was served upon IMPA and the affected state 
regulatory commission.
    Comment date: July 5, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph

    E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-15628 Filed 6-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P