[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 112 (Monday, June 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30849-30851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-14259]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-1020-000, et al.]


Louisville Gas & Electric Company, et al.; Electric Rate and 
Corporate Regulation Filings

June 5, 1995.
    Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
Commission:

1. Louisville Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95-1020-000]

    Take notice that on May 22, 1995, Louisville Gas and Electric 
Company, tendered for filing a copy of a service agreement between 
Louisville Gas and Electric Company and ENRON Power Marketing, Inc. 
under Rate GSS.
    Comment date: June 19, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

2. Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison Company, 
Pennsylvania Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95-1063-000]

    Take notice that on May 18, 1995, GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on 
behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison 
Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company (jointly referred to as the 
GPU Operating Companies), filed an executed Service Agreement between 
GPU and Stand Energy Corporation, dated May 15, 1995. This Service 
Agreement specifies that Stand Energy Corporation has agreed to the 
rates, terms and conditions of the GPU Operating Companies' Operating 
Capacity and/or Energy Sales Tariff (Sales Tariff) designated as FERC 
Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1. The Sales Tariff was accepted 
by the Commission by letter order issued on February 10, 1995 in Jersey 
Central Power & Light Co., Metropolitan Edison [[Page 30850]] Co. and 
Pennsylvania Electric Co., Docket No. ER95-276-000 and allows GPU and 
Stand Energy Corporation to enter into separately scheduled 
transactions under which the GPU Operating Companies will make 
available for sale, surplus operating capacity and/or energy at 
negotiated rates that are no higher than the GPU Operating Companies' 
cost of service.
    GPU requests a waiver of the Commission's notice requirements for 
good cause shown and an effective date of May 15, 1995 for the Service 
Agreement.
    GPU has served copies of the filing on regulatory agencies in New 
Jersey and Pennsylvania.
    Comment date: June 19, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

3. Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison Company, 
and Pennsylvania Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95-1064-000]

    Take notice that on May 18, 1995, GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on 
behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison 
Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company (jointly referred to as the 
GPU Operating Companies), filed an executed Service Agreement between 
GPU and Rainbow Energy Marketing Corporation, dated May 15, 1995. This 
Service Agreement specifies that Rainbow Energy Marketing Corporation 
has agreed to the rates, terms and conditions of the GPU Operating 
Companies' Operating Capacity and/or Energy Sales Tariff (Sales Tariff) 
designated as FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1. The Sales 
Tariff was accepted by the Commission by letter order issued on 
February 10, 1995 in Jersey Central Power & Light Co., Metropolitan 
Edison Co., and Pennsylvania Electric Co., Docket No. ER95-276-000 and 
allows GPU and Rainbow Energy Marketing Corporation to enter into 
separately scheduled transactions under which the GPU Operating 
Companies will make available for sale, surplus operating capacity and/
or energy at negotiated rates that are no higher than the GPU Operating 
Companies' cost of service.
    GPU requests a waiver of the Commission's notice requirements for 
good cause shown and an effective date of May 9, 1995 for the Service 
Agreement.
    GPU has served copies of the filing on regulatory agencies in New 
Jersey and Pennsylvania.
    Comment date: June 19, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.
4. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation

[Docket No. ER95-1066-000]

    Take notice that on May 18, 1995, Wisconsin Public Service 
Corporation tendered for filing a contribution in aid of construction 
agreement with Wisconsin Power and Light Company to recover the costs 
of work required to connect a Wisconsin Public Service Corporation 
transmission line to a new Wisconsin Power and Light line to a new 
substation. WPSC respectfully requests that this agreement be accepted 
for filing and made effective 60 days after the filing date to allow 
the billing of the work.
    Comment date: June 19, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

5. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER95-1070-000]

    Take notice that on May 19, 1995, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 
(Niagara Mohawk), tendered for filing an agreement between Niagara 
Mohawk and Rainbow Energy Marketing Corporation (REM) dated May 18, 
1995, providing for certain transmission services to REM.
    Copies of this filing were served upon REM and the New York State 
Public Service Commission.
    Comment date: June 19, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

6. Northern States Power Company (Minnesota Company)

[Docket No. ER95-1071-000]

    Take notice that on May 19, 1995, Northern States Power Company 
(Minnesota) (NSP) tendered for filing a Distribution Facilities 
Agreement between NSP and the City of Arlington (City). NSP presently 
provides firm power service to the City pursuant to a Firm Power 
Service Resale Agreement dated August 2, 1983. The Commission has 
assigned Rate Schedule No. 421 to previously filed agreements between 
NSP and City. The Distribution Facilities Agreement will replace the 
distribution substation service portion of the Firm Power Service 
Resale Agreement and sets forth the terms and conditions and rates for 
service to City for the period July 1, 1995 to December 31, 1999.
    Since distribution facilities are the subject matter of this 
Agreement, NSP requests the Commission waive jurisdiction. However, in 
the event the Commission determines the Agreement is subject to its 
jurisdiction, NSP requests the Distribution Facilities Agreement be 
accepted for filing effective July 1, 1995, and requests waiver of the 
Commission's notice requirements in order for the Distribution 
Facilities Agreement to be accepted for filing on the date requested.
    Comment date: June 19, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

7. Northern States Power Company (Minnesota Company)

[Docket No. ER95-1072-000]

    Take notice that on May 19, 1995, Northern States Power Company 
(Minnesota)(NSP), tendered for filing a Distribution Facilities 
Agreement between NSP and the City of Arlington (City). NSP presently 
provides firm power service to the City pursuant to a Firm Power 
Service Resale Agreement dated August 19, 1983. The Commission has 
assigned Rate Schedule No. 433 to previously filed agreements between 
NSP and City. The Distribution Facilities Agreement will replace the 
distribution substation service portion of the Firm Power Service 
Resale Agreement, and sets forth the terms and conditions and rates for 
service to City for the period July 1, 1995 to December 31, 1999.
    Since distribution facilities are the subject matter of this 
Agreement NSP requests the Commission waive jurisdiction. However, in 
the event the Commission determines the Agreement is subject to its 
jurisdiction, NSP requests the Distribution Facilities Agreement be 
accepted for filing effective July 1, 1995, and requests waiver of the 
Commission's notice requirements in order for the Distribution 
Facilities Agreement to be accepted for filing on the date requested.
    Comment date: June 19, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.
8. Northern States Power Company (Minnesota Company)

[Docket No. ER95-1073-000]

    Take notice that on May 19, 1995, Northern States Power Company 
(Minnesota) (NSP), tendered for filing a Distribution Facilities 
Agreement between NSP and the City of Brownton (City). NSP presently 
provides firm power service to the City pursuant to a Firm Power 
Service Resale Agreement dated August 19, 1983. The Commission has 
assigned Rate Schedule No. 422 to previously filed agreements between 
[[Page 30851]] NSP and City. The Distribution Facilities Agreement will 
replace the distribution substation service portion of the Firm Power 
Service Resale Agreement, and sets forth the terms and conditions and 
rates for service to City for the period July 1, 1995 to December 31, 
1999.
    Since distribution facilities are the subject matter of this 
Agreement, NSP requests the Commission waive jurisdiction. However, in 
the event the Commission determines the Agreement is subject to its 
jurisdiction, NSP requests the Distribution Facilities Agreement be 
accepted for filing effective July 1, 1995, and requests waiver of the 
Commission's notice requirements in order for the Distribution 
Facilities Agreement to be accepted for filing on the date requested.
    Comment date: June 19, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

9. Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison Company, 
and Pennsylvania Electric Company

[Docket No. ER95-1079-000]

    Take notice that on May 22, 1995, GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on 
behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison 
Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company (jointly referred to as the 
``GPU Operating Companies''), filed an executed Service Agreement 
between GPU and Heartland Energy Services Inc., dated May 17, 1995. 
This Service Agreement specifies that Stand Energy Corporation has 
agreed to the rates, terms and conditions of the GPU Operating 
Companies' Operating Capacity and/or Energy Sales Tariff (``Sales 
Tariff'') designated as FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1. 
The Sales Tariff was accepted by the Commission by letter order issued 
on February 10, 1995 in Jersey Central Power & Light Co., Metropolitan 
Edison Co. and Pennsylvania Electric Co., Docket No. ER95-276-000 and 
allows GPU and Heartland Energy Services Inc. to enter into separately 
scheduled transactions under which the GPU Operating Companies will 
make available for sale, surplus operating capacity and/or energy at 
negotiated rates that are no higher than the GPU Operating Companies' 
cost of service.
    GPU requests a waiver of the Commission's notice requirements for 
good cause shown and an effective date of May 17, 1995, for the Service 
Agreement.
    GPU has served copies of the filing on regulatory agencies in New 
Jersey and Pennsylvania.
    Comment date: June 19, 1995, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
E at the end of this notice.

10. Acme POSDEF Partners, L.P.

[Docket No. QF85-311-003]

    On May 25, 1995, Acme POSDEF Partners, L.P. (Applicant), c/o James 
B. Vasile, Esquire, 1330 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 
20036, submitted for filing an application for recertification of a 
facility as a qualifying cogeneration facility pursuant to Section 
292.205(b) of the Commission's Regulations. No determination has been 
made that the submittal constitutes a complete filing.
    According to Applicant, the topping-cycle cogeneration facility is 
located in Stockton, California. The Commission previously certified 
the facility as a qualifying cogeneration facility in Cogeneration 
National Corporation, 38 FERC para.62,259 (1987) and recertified the 
facility in Acme POSDEF Partners, L.P., 63 FERC para.63,127 (1993). The 
instant request for recertification is due to a change in ownership of 
the facility.
    Comment date: Thirty days after the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E 
at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

    E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protests with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-14259 Filed 6-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P