[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 5, 1995)] [Notices] [Pages 17341-17343] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 95-8241] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Intent to Supplement the December 1991 Joint EIS/EIR (Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report) for the ARWI (American River Watershed Investigation) Originally Filed With EPA in January 1992 With a Joint DSEIS/SDEIR (Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Report) on the ARWI AGENCIES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD, in cooperation with the State of California, The Reclamation Board, and with the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a joint DSEIS/SDEIR. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The reevaluation of the ARWI includes a DSEIS/SDEIR identifying and assessing new flood control alternatives and reanalyzing measures presented in the December 1991 EIS/EIR. When complete, this document will become part of the SIR (Supplemental Information Report). The DSEIS/SDEIR will describe the significance of the impacts of potential alternatives on the area's natural and cultural resources and mitigation requirements for the alternatives evaluated. The study area includes lands within the American River watershed and the Deer Creek area of the Cosumnes River basin. These alternatives examined in detail include construction of a peak flow detention dam, with various outlet configurations, near Auburn on the North Fork, American River; modifications to Folsom Dam; levee improvements on the lower American River; and increasing the flood storage allocation space in Folsom Reservoir. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Please address comments and/or questions regarding this DSEIS/SDEIR to Colonel John N. Reese, District Engineer, ATTN: Mr. Michael Welsh, Planning Division, Environmental Planning Section, CESPK-PD-R, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1325 J Street, Sacramento, California 95814- 2922, telephone area code (916) 557-6718. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. Proposed Action A DSEIS/SDEIR prepared by the Corps of Engineers, the State of California, The Reclamation Board and Department of Water Resources, and SAFCA (the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency) will expand upon the ARWI feasibility report approved by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors in June 1992. This supplemental investigation will identify and assess new flood control measures [[Page 17342]] and reevaluate previously studied measures using new baseline conditions. The Defense Appropriations Act of 1993 authorized the Natomas portion of the project, subject to certain conditions being complied with. Since that time, SAFCA has applied for, and received, a Department of the Army Permit pursuant to Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act to construct the levees described in the 1991 EIS/EIR. As part of the permit review process, SAFCA prepared and circulated a separate NEPA/CEQA (National Environmental Policy Act, and the California Environmental Quality Act) document describing the Natomas levee work. Work was initiated on the local project in 1994, and is expected to be completed in 1997. The Bureau of Reclamation and SAFCA have entered into an interim agreement to reoperate Folsom Reservoir to remove the Sacramento area from flooding from storm events having a one percent chance of occurring in any given year. This agreement is for a five year period, and may be extended an additional five year period, if mutually agreed upon. The Defense Appropriations Act of 1993 also authorized this reevaluation of the ARWI. This reevaluation analyzes the American River watershed for its contribution to Sacramento area flooding. The DSEIS/ SDEIR will fulfill requirements of NEPA and CEQA. The document will discuss alternatives and plan features and impacts on the American River watershed areas natural resources. The results of the investigations will be presented in a final SIR/EIS/EIR combined report submitted to Corps headquarters for approval and eventual submission for congressional consideration in mid 1996. 2. Alternatives The SIR and accompanying DSEIS/SDEIR will reassess flood control plans that consider improvements within the American River watershed and the Deer Creek area to increase protection to the Sacramento area from flooding on the American River. In addition to the alternatives discussed in the 1991 Feasibility Report and a no action alternative, this DSEIS/SDEIR will analyze the following major alternatives: Increase Folsom Reservoir Storage--This alternative includes modifying the outlets and spillway at Folsom Dam, and requiring that between 495,000 and 670,000 acre-feet of space be reserved in the reservoir each year, depending on the amount of water contained in the private reservoirs on the north and middle forks of the American River. Folsom Storage/Step Release Alternative--This alternative includes modifying the spillway and outlets at Folsom Dam, requiring that between 400,000 and 670,000 acre-feet of space be reserved in the reservoir each year, modify the levees along the lower American River to accommodate an objective release of 145,000 cfs with a maximum step release of 180,000 cfs, and lengthen and modify the Sacramento Weir and bypass and modify the levees along Yolo Bypass to accommodate the increased flows. Maximum Objective Release Alternative--This alternative includes modifying the spillway and outlets at Folsom Dam, requiring that between 425,000 and 670,000 acre-feet of space be reserved in the reservoir each year, modify the levees along the lower American River to accommodate an objective release of 180,000 cfs, and lengthen and modify the Sacramento Weir and bypass and modify the levees along Yolo Bypass to accommodate the increased flows. Flood Detention Dam Alternative--This alternative consists of a 498-foot high concrete gravity dam constructed using roller compacted concrete. This dam would be constructed on the North Fork American River near Auburn, and would be able to temporarily detain approximately 894,000 acre-feet of water during a major storm event. The dam would have 20 operable gates and 2 ungated sluices to control the drawdown rate and minimize the affects of inundation during inundation events. The operation of Folsom Reservoir would be returned to a fixed space requirement of 400,000 acre-feet of storage. The objective releases from Folsom Dam would remain at 115,000 cfs. The DSEIS/SDEIR will analyze impacts and mitigation requirements, which them becomes part of the project's mitigation commitment in compliance with Federal and State statutes. 3. Public Involvement a. A notice outlining the ARWI and tentatively proposed alternatives was sent to public agencies, organizations, and individuals in the study area prior to the first public forum conducted in November 1993. Additional public forums, meetings, and workshops were conducted during the remainder of 1993, and throughout 1994. The initial notice and subsequent public meetings provided the public an opportunity to identify their concerns on area flooding and on significant natural resources in the area. Responses to the notice and public hearings helped develop an environmental inventory for use in preparing the DSEIS/SDEIR. b. The feasibility report was completed in December 1991. Prior to its completion, comments were received from the public concerning the flood control alternatives and environmental impacts of those alternatives. Numerous public workshops and coordinating meetings were held to assist the State and SAFCA to determine a preferred flood control plan. For the restudy of the ARWI this process will continue with a final SEIS/EIR and SIR scheduled for December 1995. Coordination has been maintained with Federal, State and local agencies, concerned individuals and organizations. Through this Notice of Intent, all segments of the affected public and agencies are invited to participate in this reevaluation. c. Significant issues discussed in the public meetings include the degree of protection offered by the alternatives, hydrology of the area, planning objectives, alternatives analysis, impacts on fish and wildlife resources, recreation, endangered species, vegetation, esthetics, cumulative impacts, cultural resources and, hazardous and toxic waste; and the mitigation requirements to compensate for impacts to significant resources. d. Other agency review and consultation for this DSEIS/SDEIR will occur with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service who will provide a Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report under authority of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. The National Marine Fisheries Service will provide information on the anadromous fishery of both the American and Sacramento rivers under the Anadromous Fish Conservation Act. In addition, both agencies will provide information and opinions on how best to avoid impacts to species protected under the Endangered Species Act under their jurisdictions. Coordination on cultural resources will be accomplished through the State Historic Preservation Office in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act. Water quality issues will be addressed by an updated evaluation conducted pursuant to Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act, and will include coordination with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. All resource agency input, including recommendations on avoiding or minimizing impacts to natural resources, becomes part of the final ARWI SEIS/EIR. [[Page 17343]] 4. Availability The DSEIS/SDEIR is scheduled to be distributed for public review and comment in August 1995. All interested persons are encouraged to respond to this notice and provide a current address if you wish to be contacted about the DSEIS/SDEIR public involvement process. Dated: March 24, 1995. Michael P. Stuhr, LTC, EN, Colonel, Corps of Engineers Deputy District Engineer. [FR Doc. 95-8241 Filed 4-4-95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5000-BF-M