[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13110-13111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-5840]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Pilot Creek Environmental Impact Statement, Six Rivers National
Forest, Humboldt County, CA; Revised Notice of Intent
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service published a Notice of Intent (NOI) to
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in the Federal Register
(56 FR 3068) on January 15, 1991 for the proposed timber management
project in the Pilot and Torrey Compartments of the Mad River Ranger
District. The draft EIS was delayed due to a change in project
objectives. A revised NOI was published in the Federal Register (57 FR
30715) on June 19, 1992. The objectives of the project were modified to
implement a strategy that would accelerate the development of late
seral habitat characteristics and result in timber production. The
draft EIS was expected to be available for public review in June 1993.
The draft EIS was delayed due to anticipated changes resulting from
President Clinton's Forest Conference held in April of 1993.
As a result of the Forest Conference, The Record of Decision for
Amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning
Documents Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl (ROD) was signed
on April 13, 1994. Subsequently, as required by the ROD, a Watershed
Analysis for the Pilot Creek watershed was developed. Survey protocol
requirements were also completed for marbled murrelet within the Pilot
Creek project area.
The objectives of the Pilot Creek project have been modified to
bring the project in line with ecosystem management concepts and to be
consistent with direction contained within the ROD and the Six Rivers
National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), scheduled for
implementation April 1995.
The revised project objectives are to:
1. Maintain existing late seral conifer stands.
2. Accelerate the development of late seral characteristics within
conifer stands.
3. Restore currently degraded conditions which pose risks to
riparian and aquatic ecosystems.
4. Maintain or enhance oak woodland habitat.
5. Reduce the risk of catastrophic loss due to wildfire.
6. Contribute to the short-term demand for timber and the socio-
economic well-being of local communities.
Substantial scoping has been conducted on this project and includes
public meetings, written correspondence, field trips and one-on-one
discussions. The driving issues that were used to develop project
alternatives focused on water quality and the released roadless area.
Five alternatives were developed that will be redesigned to incorporate
the expanded objectives and brought into consistency with the ROD and
LRMP.
The project area has been expanded to encompass the entire Pilot
Creek watershed and now covers 25,442 acres. The project area is within
the Hayfork Adaptive Management Area which, as described in the ROD, is
designed for the development, testing, and application of forest
management practices.
The draft EIS is now expected to be filed with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and available for public review in June 1995.
At that time the EPA will publish a notice of availability of the draft
EIS in the Federal Register. The final EIS is now scheduled to be
completed in November 1995.
The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will
be 45 days from the date the EPA's Notice of Availability appears in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
a Draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to
the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft stage but that are not raised until
after completion of the final EIS may be waived or dismissed by the
courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F. 2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986)
and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very
[[Page 13111]] important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also
address the adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcia Andre, District Ranger, Mad
River Ranger District, Star Route Box 300, Bridgeville, California
95526 or telephone Janice Stevenson, Project Planner (707) 574-6233.
Dated: February 22, 1995.
Harold J. Slate,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 95-5840 Filed 3-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M